Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Science & The New Atheists Dr. Heinz Lycklama [email protected] www.osta.com/messages “Religion has run out of justifications. Thanks to the telescope and the microscope, it no longer offers an explanation of anything important.” “… is the apparent grand design of our universe evidence of a benevolent creator who set things in motion – or does science offer another explanation?” Christopher Hitchens The Grand Design Science and The New Atheists 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The New Atheism Science and Knowledge Creation, Evolution, and Intelligent Design (ID) Darwin, Dawkins & Design: Dawkins’ Claims Telling If Something Is Designed Stephen Hawking’s Grand Design In Conclusion @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 2 1. The New Atheism Atheist writers of the 21st century Religion Religion should: Is based on blind faith Poisons everything Not be tolerated Be countered and criticized Be exposed by rational arguments Recent scientific advancements Less accommodating attitude toward religion, superstition, religious fanaticism @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 3 The Books By The New Atheists The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins The Greatest Show on Earth, Dawkins The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking By Christian Apologists God’s Undertaker, John Lennox Gunning For God, John Lennox The Greatest Hoax on Earth, Jonathan Sarfati God and Stephen Hawking, John Lennox @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 4 2. Science and Knowledge Evolution explains everything There is no need for God Origin of the universe Origin of first life Complex life forms No scientific evidence for God Richard Dawkins “God almost certainly does not exist” Darwinian natural selection explains the “illusion of design” in living things Multi-verse theory explains our universe @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 5 Limitations of Science Science the only way to find truth? Science presupposes truth is real Use of the five senses Presupposes reliability of 5 senses Assumes that a real world exists Honesty is a moral virtue Science limited in scope Moral laws Concept of truth Meaning in life @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 6 More on Dawkins’ Arguments All explanations must be physical/natural No non-physical or supernatural explanations Ruled out a priori Scientism biased against supernatural Validity of human reason required for our knowledge, otherwise can’t trust the conclusions drawn by our reason If naturalism is true No way to know it is true Reason is by chance No basis for faith in human reason @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 7 3. Creation, Evolution and ID Creation Evolution God created the universe and all life according to its kinds Macro-Evolution Molecules -> man Common descent “A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.” Charles Darwin Intelligent Design (ID) Information implies an intelligent designer Irreducible complexity Specified complexity @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 8 The Meaning of Evolution 1. Artificial Selection 2. Change 3. Small variation within prescribed limits of complexity e.g., finch beaks by mutation and natural selection Macro-Evolution 5. Evolution of a coastline (random) Evolution of a car (designed) Micro-Evolution 4. Plant and animal breeding Only 1, 2 and 3 have been observed 4 never observed! Particles -> people Molecular Evolution 5 is impossible! Origin of life – assumes a mutating replicator @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 9 Evolution Mechanisms Natural Selection Selection of genes/mutations for survival of the fittest An observable process that supposedly underlies the mechanism of unobservable molecules-to-man evolution Requires a directional change Mutations Result of random copying errors/changes in genes (DNA) Supposedly source of new traits for Evolution Genetic information is lost/sorted Requires predominantly beneficial mutations @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 10 Natural Selection Selecting information that already exists Natural Selection Can Decrease genetic information Allow organisms to survive better in a given environment Act as a “selector” Support Creation’s “orchard” of life Natural Selection Cannot @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama Increase or generate new genetic information Allow organisms to evolve from molecules to man Act as an “originator” Support evolutionary “tree of life” 11 Chance, Necessity (Law) or Design? @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 12 Chance, Necessity or Design? Scratches on cave wall Human genome 3B Base Pairs 20T Cells @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 13 The Evolutionists’ Response? “Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such a hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic.” “Biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” S.C. Todd, Kansas State University Professor Richard Dawkins, Oxford Univ. Atheist Biologist “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.” Francis Crick, Co-discoverer of DNA @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 14 Present + Repeatable + Observable = SCIENCE Past + Non-Repeatable + Eyewitness Account = HISTORY Past + Non-Repeatable + No Eyewitnesses = BELIEF @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 15 Science – Operation & Origin “Operation” Science “Origins” Science Postulate theory -> make observations -> prove/falsify theory Using the Scientific Method “Forensic” science Were you there at the beginning? Model of Creation Model of Evolution Use principles of analogy and causality to determine if a model is plausible Good science follows the evidence @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 16 Scientific Tests What we can test scientifically Observable/repeatable processes Trends/tendencies in nature Processes/events that left evidence What we cannot test scientifically Identity/motivation of who/whatever brought the universe and life into existence Historical events Morality Meaning @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 17 Origins Can’t Be Tested or Proved Creation cannot be “proved” Not taking place now (completed) Not accessible to use of scientific method Can’t devise experiment to describe Creation process Evolution cannot be “proved” If it is taking place, operates too slowly to measure Transmutation would take millions of years The scientific method cannot be used to measure it Small variations in organisms (observed today) are not relevant Can’t be used to distinguish between Creation & Evolution @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 18 More on Origin Science Origin Science uses: Principle of Analogy posits same kind of cause for a similar effect in the past Principle of Causality posits that every event much have an adequate cause Origin science issues: Origin of the universe & First Cause Origin of first life & law of biogenesis Origin of new life forms & fossil record Chance and natural laws are inadequate causes @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 19 4. Darwin, Dawkins & Design: Dawkins’ Claims 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Science can answer all life’s questions Natural Selection accounts for design Evolution must be true Origin of life due to “stroke of luck” Origin of the cell due to “stroke of luck” Consciousness due to “stroke of luck” God’s existence is disproved by science @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 20 1. Science Can Answer All Life’s Questions The assumption of Scientism 1. 2. All knowledge comes through science No place for supernatural explanation The truth is: Scientism is self-defeating 1. e.g. “there are no absolutes” (an absolute statement!) “Science is the only way to arrive at truth” 2. Does Dawkins know this by scientific method? No, it is a philosophical statement @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 21 Science, Philosophy, Religion Overlap What you believe in one area relates to foundational ideas in other areas Overlapping realms of knowledge Science answers certain questions Philosophy answer other questions What does this orange weigh? What chemical components make up this? Why is there something rather than nothing? Does God exist? Religion answers some other questions What is God like? How can we relate to God? @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 22 2. Natural Selection Accounts for Design Dawkins’ claim: Natural selection accounts for the “apparent design” in life “Consider it climbed” The reality is: Dawkins substitutes stories for facts Climbing Mount Improbable, one small step at a time Natural selection is a cumulative process Consider the human eye … @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 23 Real Story is Much More Complicated Research in genetics, cell biology, biochemistry has shown Darwin’s Black Box by Michael Behe Sophistication and astounding level of detail now known Sight requires irreducible complexity All parts must work together Dawkins’ explanation too simplistic Focuses on gross anatomy of the eye Does not explain nuts and bolts of sight @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 24 3. Evolution Must Be True “Evolution is a fact” It must be true because we are here Circular reasoning “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here” “We know we are here because we are here” The truth is: Life only comes from pre-existing life The Law of Biogenesis never disproven Louis Pasteur in 1860 Miller’s experiment in 1953 @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 25 4. “Origin of Life” Claim Dawkins claims a stroke of luck! “We can deal with the unique origin of life by postulating a very large number of planetary opportunities. Once that initial stroke of luck has been granted – and the anthropic principle most decisively grants it to us – natural selection takes over.” Appeal to ignorance or pure speculation “Stroke of luck” isn’t scientific Dawkins postulates a large number of earth-like planets An assertion not scientifically verified “Given enough changes, anything can happen.” Not a valid claim – some things will never happen! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 26 Earth Unique As a Home For Life Anthropic principle Just Six Numbers, Martin Rees 100+ unique physical constants The Privileged Planet, Gonzales & Richards Earth uniquely situated to sustain complex life Earth uniquely situated to observe the universe The multiverse as an explanation? There Is a God, Antony Flew “So multiverse or not, we still have to come to terms with the origin of the laws of nature. And the only viable explanation here is the divine Mind.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 27 5. “Origin of the Cell” Claim Another stroke of luck! “Nevertheless, it may be that the origin of life is not the only major gap in the evolutionary story that is bridged by sheer luck, anthropically justified … The origin of the eukaryotic cell … was an even more momentous, difficult and statistically improbable step than the origin of life.” Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion Another appeal to ignorance The truth – DNA is a biotic message “I love Pat” written in the sand takes an intelligent source, not wind and waves “The problem of how meaningful or semantic information can emerge spontaneously from a collection of mindless molecules subject to blind and purposeless forces presents a deep conceptual challenge.” Paul Davies @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 28 6. “Origin of Consciousness” Claim Another stroke of luck! Another appeal to ignorance “The origin of consciousness might be another major gap whose bridging was of the same order of improbability. … And of these a yet smaller fraction managed to cross the later Rubicon to consciousness.” No idea how consciousness could come from unconscious molecules – sure lucky it did! The truth You can’t get mind from mindless molecules Mindless molecules do not produce a rational mind You can’t get something (mind) from nothing (no mind) @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 29 7. “Science Disproves God” Claim Dawkins argues from naturalism “ … the existence of God is a scientific hypothesis like any other … God’s existence or nonexistence is a scientific fact about the universe, discoverable in principle if not in practice.” An appeal to reductionism Everything in the universe can be reduced to laws of physics and chemistry No reason to assume that our minds accurately reflect the external world You are simply an arrangement of molecules in motion Our thoughts are just chemical reactions @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 30 Reductionism Destroys Rationality Charles Darwin, Origin of Species “With me, the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man’s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy.” John Polkinghorne, British particle physicist and theologian “Reductionism destroys rationality. Thought is replaced by electro-chemical neural events. Two such events cannot confront each other in rational discourse. They are neither right or wrong. They simply happen … The world of rational discourse dissolves into the absurd chatter of firing synapses. Quite frankly, that cannot be right and none of us believes it to be so.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 31 Christianity & Modern Science Modern science originated in Christianity Universe is governed by laws -> Lawgiver Belief system that supported the scientific method Isaac Newton: “This most beautiful system of sun, planets and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being.” The universe is knowable to our minds -> Rational Mind Johannes Kepler: “The chief aim of all investigations of the external world should be to discover the rational order that has been imposed on it by God.” “Thinking God’s thoughts after Him.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 32 Knowledge and Science Definition of science depends on philosophical assumptions Science depends on philosophy/worldview Should we interpret scientific observations only through the dogma of naturalism? Use scientific method to detect design? Yes, for sciences that infer intelligent causes – Archaeology, Forensic science, SETI project Scientific inferences, e.g. atoms (not seen) inferred from observations that we do see @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 33 Complexity In Nature Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” “The physicist’s problem is the problem of ultimate origins and ultimate natural laws. The biologist’s problem is the problem of complexity.” “We animals are the most complicated things in the known universe.” Can natural laws/processes/reactions account for the intricate complexity displayed in all living organisms? @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 34 5. Telling If Something Is Designed Irreducible complexity shows design Mouse trap, with its 5 parts Molecular machines, “all or nothing” functionality, e.g. bacterium flagellum Specified complexity shows design Information demands intelligence DNA Inner workings of the cell @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 35 Design Inference Inference of design -> intelligent source Our experience tells us all manmade information systems and complex machines have an intelligent origin Therefore we infer that biological systems also require an intelligent source Following where the evidence leads requires a designer to account for: 1. 2. 3. Biological information Irreducible complexity Specified complexity @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 36 6. Stephen Hawking’s Grand Design New answers to the ultimate questions of life offered by Hawking & Mlodinow How can we understand our world? How does the universe behave? What is the nature of reality? Where did all this come from? Does the universe need a creator? Hawking’s “why” questions Why is there something rather than nothing? Why do we exist? Why this particular set of laws and not some other? @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 37 The Grand Design 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. The Mystery of Being The Rule of Law What is Reality? Alternative Histories The Theory of Everything Choosing Our Universe The Apparent Miracle The Grand Design @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 38 Hawking’s Conjectures Philosophy is dead New answers suggested by recent discoveries Modern science has bypassed it Recent advances in theoretical physics New picture of the universe and our place in it Very different from the traditional picture Hawking invokes M-theory (Theory of Everything) Multiple universes arise naturally from physical law They are a prediction of science Only a few universes can support life @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 39 God and Stephen Hawking Book by John Lennox 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Stephen Hawking The big questions God or the laws of nature? God or the multiverse? Whose design is it anyway? Science and rationality The laws of physics themselves brought the universe into being John Lennox Hawking’s arguments make a Creator God’s existence all the more probable @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 40 Answering Hawking Hawking has an inadequate view of philosophy, of God, and of science “Philosophy is dead” – logically incoherent Confuses God with “the gods” and thus rejects both Regards atheism as a prerequisite for science God is not a “God of the gaps” but the author of the whole show Hawking substitutes multiverse for powerful evidence of design Laws of physics brought universe into existence Rejects Anthropic Principle @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 41 Hawking’s Confusion Between physical law and personal agent Between 4 different causes/explanations: (Aristotle’s 4 “levels of explanations”) A choice between false alternatives God is the personal agent (Creator) Physical laws are descriptive and predictive, but they do not create Material – the raw material Formal – concept, plan, blueprint Efficient – designer, engineer Ultimate purpose – travel faster God is excluded from the explanation by Hawking’s worldview, not by science @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 42 Science and Rationality Christianity’s theme Hawking’s & Crick’s thinking The universe was built according to a rational, intelligent design “ …we human beings are nothing but mere collections of fundamental particles of nature.” There is a deep conflict between science & religion Darwin’s Doubt “ … whether the convictions of man’s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy.” @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 43 Rational Intelligent Faith Based on cumulative evidence of science: Laws of nature (normal), fine-tuned constants of nature, rational intelligibility of universe Miracles (not normal) performed by God, the Lawgiver, are recognized as abnormal Established by “inductive inference” Based on cumulative evidence of : History, e.g. Christ’s resurrection Scripture, e.g. confirmed by archaeology, prophecy, history, geography Personal experience, e.g. morality, conscience Established by “abductive inference”, i.e. inference to the best explanation @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 44 7. In Conclusion Science is possible because of the laws of nature Origin of the universe requires a Designer Origin of first life form requires a Designer Origin of new life forms requires a Designer Intelligent Design (ID) is science Universe was built according to a rational design Our faith is based on the cumulative evidence of scripture, science, history, and personal experience God is the Grand Designer The New Atheists Don’t Have a Case! @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 45 The New Atheists Don’t Have a Case! Thank you for your attention! “One of the fundamental themes of Christianity is that the universe was built according to a rational, intelligent design.” John Lennox Dr. Heinz Lycklama [email protected] www.osta.com www.osta.com/messages @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 46 Some Reference Books God Is Not Great. How Religion Poisons Everything, Christopher Hitchens God Is. How Christianity Explains Everything, Douglas Wilson Letter to a Christian Nation, Sam Harris Letter from a Christian Citizen, Douglas Wilson The God Delusion, Dr. Richard Dawkins The Deluded Atheist, Douglas Wilson The Atheist Delusion, Phil Fernandes The Return of the Village Atheist, Joel McDurmon Gunning For God. Why The New Atheists Are Missing The Target, Dr. John Lennox More Than a Carpenter, Josh & Sean McDowell The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow God and Stephen Hawking, Dr. John Lennox @ Dr. Heinz Lycklama 47