Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Design Randomisation * 2:1 Double blind > 18 years HCV infection Genotype 1, 4, 6 HCV RNA ≥ 10 000 IU/mL Treatment-naïve ≥ 3 months opioid replacement Compensated cirrhosis allowed HIV co-infection allowed W12 W16 W24 W28 N = 201 GZR/EBR 100/50 mg qd GZR/EBR (N = 95) Placebo N = 100 * Randomisation was stratified on genotype and cirrhosis (yes or no) Objective – SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL) with 2 – sided 95% CI • • • • C-EDGE CO-STAR By intention to treat analysis: includes all patients, reinfection = failure By modified ITT (primary efficacy endpoint): reinfection = success Discontinuation without relapse considered as failure Superiority of immediate GZR/EBR (hypothesis of SVR12 ≥ 85%) vs reference rate of 67%, 99% power Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Baseline characteristics and patient disposition GZR/EBR N = 201 Placebo N = 100 Age, years, median 48 47 Female, % 24 23 15 / 78 / 5 7 / 84 / 7 Genotype, % 1a 1b 4 6 76 15 6 2.5 75 15 6 4 IL28B CC, % 28.4 29.0 HCV RNA > 2 000 000 IU/mL, % 56.7 51.0 Fibrosis stage F4, % 19.9 22.0 HIV co-infection, % 8.0 5.0 Urine drug screen positive at D1, % 62.2 53.1 5 3 1 1 7 7 0 0 Black / White / Asian, % Discontinuation before W12 of follow-up (active phase), N Lost to follow-up For adverse event Administrative reason C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Primary endpoint: SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL), % (95% CI), ITT mFAS* Immediate GZR/EBR % 94.0 (89.8-96.0) 100 95.5 (90.9-98.2) 93.3 (77.9-99.2) 91.7 (61.5-99.8) 60 (14.7-94.7) 75 50 25 0 N= 201 All patients SVR12 , ITT, Full analysis set Non-virologic failure Relapse Reinfection 91.5% 5 7 5 154 30 Genotype 1a Genotype 1b 93.5% 3 4 3 93.3% 1 1 0 12 5 Genotype 4 Genotype 6 91.7% 20% 1 0 0 0 2 2 * ITT, mFAS: reinfection = success, unrelated discontinuation = excluded C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Primary endpoint: SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL), % (95% CI), ITT mFAS* Deferred GZR/EBR % 89.5 (81.5-94.8) 100 90.1 (80.7-95.9) 92.9 (66.1-99.8) 100 (54.1-100) 75 50 (6.8-93.2) 50 25 0 N= 95 All patients SVR12 , ITT, Full analysis set Non-virologic failure Relapse Breakthrough Reinfection 89.5% 7 1 2 0 71 14 Genotype 1a Genotype 1b 90.1% 6 0 1 0 92.9% 1 0 0 0 6 4 Genotype 4 Genotype 6 100% 50% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 * ITT, mFAS: reinfection = success, unrelated discontinuation = excluded C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy SVR12 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL) in the immediate treatment group, by subgroup, % (95% CI), ITT, Full analysis set * % 100 92.8 (87.5-96.4) 93.8 (85-98.3) 92.5 91.3 (85.8-95.2) (79.6-98.4) 92.0 (84.3-96.7) 87.5 (74.8-95.3) 90.4 (84.2-94.8) 153 48 136 65 161 40 88 113 Male Female Positive Negative No Yes No Yes 91.2 (84.3-95.7) 75 50 25 0 Sex Drug screen Cirrhosis HCV RNA > 2 000 000 IU/mL * Reinfection = failure C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy SVR12 and SVR24 (HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL), %, per protocol Immediate treatment % 100 Deferred treatment 95.5 94.1 96.6 198 186 88 SVR24 SVR12 96.5 75 50 25 N= 0 C-EDGE CO-STAR SVR12 85 SVR24 Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Urine drug screen results, from D1 to treatment W12 – At each visit, in both groups • > 50% of patients with positive urine drug screen of any drug among the 8 following classes: amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, propoxyphene – Positive UDS results at baseline or during treatment (2 or more positive UDS results) did not affect adherence or efficacy, regardless of which drug class was positive on UDS Adherence to study drugs Immediate Adherence > 95% during the 12 weeks C-EDGE CO-STAR Deferred GZR/EBR GZR/EBR Placebo phase Active phase 96.5% 100% 95.8% Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy SVR12 and urine drug screen results in the immediate treatment group (all randomised patients) SVR12 Subgroup n/N % (95% CI) Opiod agonist therapy at D1 Buprenorphine Methadone 37/39 147/162 94.9 (82.7-99.4) 90.7 (85.2-94.7) Drug screen during the treatment period Positive (at least 2 time points) Negative 123/136 61/65 90.4 (84.2-94.8) 93.8 (85.0-98.3) C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Reinfection % Reinfections 3.0 Virologic failures 2.0 1.0 0.0 Reinfection, N (%) Virologic failure, N (%) TW10 or 12 FW4 FW8 FW12 FW24 0 (0.0) 2 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 3 (1.0) 5 (1.7) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (0.7) 1 (0.3) 2 (0.7) Incidence of reinfection – 4.6 reinfections (CI, 1.7 to 10.0) per 100 person-years 6 reinfections: different genotype, subtype or viral strain C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore G. EASL 2016, Abs. SAT-163, J Hepatol 2016;64:S771 ; Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Summary of 18 patients with virological failure or probable reinfection Age, sex, cirrhotic status HCV RNA Genotype Drug screen Type/Time of failure 61-y, white male, cirrhosis 5.6 million IU/mL 1a Positive Relapse follow-up W12 50-y, black male, cirrhosis 13.6 million IU/mL 1a Negative Relapse follow-up W4 56-y, male, no cirrhosis 1.2 million IU/mL 1a Positive Relapse follow-up W8 63-y, white female, no cirrhosis 3.5 million IU/mL 1a Positive Relapse follow-up W4 63-y, black female, no cirrhosis 1.7 million IU/mL 1b Negative Relapse follow-up W12 29-y, asian male, no cirhhosis 33.2 million IU/mL 6a Positive Relapse follow-up W4 34-y, asian male, no cirrhosis 25.5 million IU/mL 6a Positive Relapse follow-up W8 335 157 IU/mL 1a Not done Relapse follow-up W24 50-y, black female, cirrhosis 9.5 million IU/mL 1b Positive Relapse follow-up W24 58-y, black male, cirrhosis 2.8 million IU/mL 1a Positive Breakthrough W12 59-y, asian male, no cirrhosis 1.9 million IU/mL 6b Negative Relapse follow-up W8 43-y, asian male, no cirrhosis 6.8 million IU/mL 6a Positive Breakthrough W12 48-y, asian male, no cirrhosis 17 274 IU/mL 1a Positive Reinfection (GT 6a) FU W8 33-y, white female, no cirrhosis 535 293 IU/mL 1a Positive Reinfection (GT 1a) FU W8 55-y, white female, cirrhosis 3.2 million IU/mL 1a Positive Reinfection (GT 3a) FU W8 45-y, asian male, no cirrhosis 4.8 million IU/mL 6a Positive Reinfection (GT 1b) FU W8 37-y, asian female, no cirrhosis 18.6 million IU/mL 6a Positive Reinfection (GT 6a) FU W8 33-y, white male, no cirrhosis 1.5 million IU/mL 1b Not done Reinfection (GT 3a) FU W24 29-y, white female, no cirrhosis C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Viral resistance (population sequencing) – Baseline NS3 RAVs: genotype 1a = 64/149 (43.0%) ; genotype 1b = 3/29 (10.3%) – Baseline NS5A RAVs: genotype 1a = 3/150 (2.0%) ; genotype 1b = 3/29 (10.3%) – SVR12 in genotype 1 • 98.2% vs 95.5% if NS3 RAVs absent or present, respectively • 97.7% vs 83.3% if NS5A RAVs absent or present, respectively – SVR12 in genotype 4 with baseline NS5A RAVs = 3/3 – Genotype 6 • SVR12 in patients with baseline NS3 RAVs = 3/5 • SVR12 in patients with baseline NS5A RAVs = 3/4 C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Adverse events, % GZR/EBR N = 201 Deferred GZR/EBR Placebo phase N = 100 Active phase N = 95 Serious adverse event 3.5 4.0 3.0 Serious drug-related adverse event 0.5 1.0 0 Adverse event leading to discontinuation 0.5 1.0 0 Fatigue 15.9 20.0 13.7 Headache 12.4 13.0 12.6 Nausea 10.9 9.0 7.4 AST/ALT > 3 x ULN 0 2 0 Total bilirubin > 2.6 x ULN 0 0 0 0.5 1 1.1 0 0 0 Most frequent adverse events Hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL Creatinine > 2.5 times baseline level C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy Summary – EBR/GZR demonstrated high efficacy in genotype 1 and 4-infected patients receiving opiate agonist therapy • Limitation: small number of genotype 6-infected patients – Acceptable safety profile with comparable adverse event rates between the immediate and deferred treatment arms – High study medication adherence – Stable ongoing drug use throughout the initial treatment phase in both groups – Reinfection rate is higher in the immediate follow-up period – These results support the removal of drug use as a barrier to interferonfree HCV treatment for patients receiving opiate agonist therapy C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:625-636 C-EDGE CO-STAR: grazoprevir/elbasvir for HCV infected drug users on opiod replacement therapy 3-year Follow-up on Risk Factors and Rate of Reinfection Observational cohort (6-month follow-up visits) – Follow-up of 199/296 (67%) patients enrolled in Co-STAR – Positive urine drug screen (UDS) at enrollment: 56% and 58% of patients in the 3YFU study and the Phase 3 trial, respectively – Median time from EOT to the first visit during the 3YFU was 330 days (range: 206-485) – 84 (56%) patients reported any drug use (non-injecting or injecting) in the past 6 months. Injecting drug use in the past 6 months was reported by 25% of patients – Reinfection rate : higher in the immediate follow-up period through week (FW)12 (N = 5) than in the period through FW24 (+1) and through the ongoing observational follow-up • Overall reinfection rate through the 6-month follow-up period is 4.0/100 personyears (N = 8) [ 95% CI : 1.7-8.0] • Including only those patients with persistence of viremia (N = 5), the effective reinfection rate is 2.5/100 person-years [95% CI : 0.8-5.9] – These data support addressing barriers in the treatment of patients on opiate agonist therapy and patients with ongoing drug use C-EDGE CO-STAR Dore GJ. AASLD 2016, Abs. 871