Download Complete Mathematical Induction and Prime Numbers

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Complete Mathematical Induction and Prime Numbers
Original Notes adopted from September 18, 2001 (Week 2)
© P. Rosenthal , MAT246Y1, University of Toronto, Department of Mathematics typed by A. Ku Ong
Complete Mathematical Induction
If S ⊂ N such that:
a) 1 ∈ S
b) (k +1 ) ∈ S whenever { 1,2,3, ..., k } ⊂ S, then S = N.
Example: What is Wrong with this Proof?
Thm: For each n ∈ N, every set of people consists of people the same age.
Proof: True for n = 1.
Use Complete Mathematical Induction
Assume true for n = 1,2,3,...k. Some k.
Consider case n = k +1.
Let S be any set of k +1 people, say S = { x1, x2,... x k, x k+1}
Let S0 = { x1, x2,... xk} k people, so all some age by induction hypothesis.
Let S1 = { x2,x3,x4, ... x k, x k+1}
k people, all same age.
In particular, all same age as x2 etc. for elements of S0.
∴Everyone in S same age as x2
∴By Mathematical Induction (Complete/Ordinary), every set of people consists of people the
same age.
Series with Positive Terms:
a1 + a2 + a3 + .... aj > 0.
Such a series Diverges if for every M, there is a j such that
a1 + a2 + ... aj > M.
Such a series Converges if there is a j such that
aj + a j + 1 + ... + a j + k < 1/2 for every k.
Eg. 1+3+5+ 7... diverges
Eg. 1+ 1/2 +1/4 +1/8 ...converges.
Harmonic Series
1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4.... diverges
1 + (1/2 + 1/3) + 1/4 + (1/5 +1/6 +1/7 +1/8)
(> 1/4 +1/4)
(1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8 + 1/8)
> 1/2
> 1/2
1+ 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... converges.
Suppose {bn} is a sequence of natural numbers with bn+1> bn.
Consider the series
1/b1 + 1/b2 +1/b3 + ...
Case bn = n ⇒ diverges
Case bn = 2n ⇒ converges
Suppose bn is the nth prime number.
1/2 + 1/3 + 1/5 +1/7 + 1/11 + 1/13... Does it converge?
Thm: If Pn is the nth prime number, then 1/p1 + 1/p2 + ... + 1/pj + ... diverges.
Proof: Suppose it converges;
Then there would be some j such that 1/pj+1 + 1/pj+2 + 1/pj+ k <1/2 for all k.
Show that this is impossible: Each natural number n,
(recall: every n ≠ 1 is a product of primes)
Let F(n) be the number of natural numbers ≤ n that are products of primes all of which are in
{ P1, P2, ... Pn}
We will estimate F(n) in Two different ways that will show, for large enough n there is a contradiction.
Fix some n. For each m<= n, write m = s2t where s2 is the largest perfect square in m.
At most √n such s's arise as you go through all m <=n
If m sets combined in F(n) then m = Pi, Pii, Piii
= s 2t
where all i's ≤ j
Each t is a product of primes in {Pi,... Pj}
In t, no two primes are the same, since t is "square free".
Thus there are at most 2 j t's that arise from m's that set counted in F(n).
* F(n) ≤ √n 2j
n – F(n) is the number of natural numbers that are ≤ and have a prime factor among {Pj +1 , Pj + 2... }
1/Pj+1 + 1/Pj+2 + ... 1/ Pj+k <1/2.
At most n/Pj + 1 numbers ≤ have Pj + 1 as a factor
n- F(n) ≤ n/Pj + 1 + n/Pj + 2 + ... ≤ n/2
* F(n) ≤ √n2j
n – F(n) ≤ n/2
n/2 ≤ F(n) ≤ √n2j
√n ≤2 j+1 j, fixed.
True for all n. But false for large n. Contradiction.
Defn: A natural number is composite if it is not 1 & isn't prime.
Can you find 20 consecutive composite numbers?
(21)! + 2, (21) ! + 3, (21)! +4..... (21)! +21 ⇒ 20 consecutive composites.
Thm: For any k, there exist k consecutive composite numbers.
Proof: (k+1)! +2, (k+1)! + 3,..., (k+1)! + k +1 are all composite.
Let p(x) = x2 – x + 41
p(1) = 41 – prime
p(2) = 43 – prime
p(3) = 47 – prime
p(4) = 53 prime
Prime for x = 1,2,3.... 40.
Thm: There is no polynomial (with integer coefficients) whose values are prime for all natural number
values of the variable.
p(x) = anxn + an - 1xn-1 + ... +a1x + a0
Z: set of integers...-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3 For n ∈N, n+ (-n) =0.
Want distributive law: a(b+c) = ab + ac.
Then (-a)(-b) + (a)(-b)
= (-a +a)(-b)
= 0(-b) =0
ab + a(-b) = a(b + (-b) ) = a*0 = 0
(-a)(-b) + a(-b) = 0 ab + a(-b)
(-a)(-b) =ab
For a,b ∈ Z, a|b if there exists c ∈ Z such that b = ac.
Eg. Is 229 + 3 divisible by 7?
Let m be a fixed natural number.
Def: a ≡b (mod m) "a is congruent to be modulo m"
if a – b is divisible by a (For a,b ∈ Z)
Suppose k,m ∈ N , k = mq +r (divide m into k, get quotient q and remainder r)
k = r(mod m)
ie) a natural number is congruent mod m to its remainder upon division by m.
_
Related documents