Download Walking the dog: exploration of the contact networks between dogs

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Walking the dog: exploration of the contact networks between dogs in a
community
Westgarth C (1), Gaskell RM (1), Pinchbeck GL (1), Bradshaw JWS (2), Dawson S (1),
Christley RM (1).
(1) Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, UK.
(2) Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK.
Little is known about the frequency, extent and nature of contact within a population
of owned pet dogs. A door-step interview of 1278 households in a community in
Cheshire, UK (Westgarth et al., 2007), identified 260 dog-owning households that were
subsequently recruited into a questionnaire study of owner and dog behaviour and
general management (Westgarth et al., 2008). In the present study, we used social
network analysis to investigate (a) the use of public space in the area for dog walking,
(b) the potential for contact among households through dog walking and (c) factors
affecting these, among 214 households.
Networks were constructed from maps of the local area on which regular walking
routes had been marked. We identified a high level of potential contact between dog
owning households; most households walked their dogs in only a few areas but a small
number visited many. Highly connected households were more likely to have multiple
dogs, walk their dogs off lead, and own Working, Pastoral or some terrier types.
Similarly, most areas were only visited by a few households but a few were visited by
many.
Despite identification of sub-groups of households and locations, we demonstrated
high connectivity between dog-owning households, with minimum path lengths of two
‘steps’ (household-area-household, 74%) or four ‘steps’ (via two areas, 26%). The
general structure of the networks appeared stable across time periods of the day. Our
networks demonstrated short path lengths, clustering of nodes, and some skewed
degree distributions; characteristics observed in many networks. In theory, highly
connected dogs could be identified and ‘removed’ in the event of an infectious disease
outbreak, for example through targeted vaccination or not being walked during a critical
disease period. However, the high overall connectivity of our network meant that
experimental targeted removal of nodes in this manner did not have a major effect.
In conclusion, pet dogs and their owners are more highly connected than they may
first appear, which is beneficial socially, but emphasises the need for high standards of
welfare and preventive veterinary care for dogs.
Westgarth, C., Pinchbeck, G.L., Bradshaw, J.W.S., Dawson, S., Gaskell, R.M., Christley,
R.M., 2007. Factors associated with dog ownership and contact with dogs in a UK
community. BMC Veterinary Research 3.
Westgarth, C., Pinchbeck, G.L., Bradshaw, J.W.S., Dawson, S., Gaskell, R.M., Christley,
R.M., 2008. Dog-human and dog-dog interactions of 260 dog-owning households
in a community in Cheshire The Veterinary Record 162, 436-442.
This study has been published in Epidemiology and Infection (2009), 137, 8, 1169-1168.