Download Federal Deficits and the National Debt

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Pensions crisis wikipedia , lookup

Recession wikipedia , lookup

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
1
Federal Deficits and the National
Debt
∗
OpenStax College
This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0†
Abstract
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
• Explain the U.S. federal budget in terms of annual debt and accumulated debt
• Understand how economic growth or decline can inuence a budget surplus or budget decit
Having discussed the
revenue
(taxes) and expense (spending) side of the budget, we now turn to the
annual budget decit or surplus, which is the dierence between the tax revenue collected and spending over
a scal year, which starts October 1 and ends September 30 of the next year.
Figure 1 (Pattern of Federal Budget Decits and Surpluses, 19302012 ) shows the pattern of annual
federal budget decits and surpluses, back to 1930, as a share of GDP. When the line is above the horizontal
axis, the budget is in surplus; when the line is below the horizontal axis, a budget decit occurred. Clearly,
the biggest decits as a share of GDP during this time were incurred to nance World War II. Decits were
also large during the 1930s, the 1980s, the early 1990s, and most recently during the recession of 20082009.
∗ Version
1.4: Mar 12, 2014 9:07 am -0500
† http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
2
Pattern of Federal Budget Decits and Surpluses, 19302012
Figure 1: The federal government has run budget decits for decades. The budget was briey in
surplus in the late 1990s, before heading into decit again in the rst decade of the 2000sand especially
deep decits in the recession of 20082009. (Source: Economic Report of the President, Table B-79,
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ERP-2013/content-detail.html)
1 Debt/GDP Ratio
Another useful way to view the budget decit is through the prism of accumulated debt rather than annual
decits.
The
national debt
refers to the total amount that the government has borrowed over time; in
contrast, the budget decit refers to how much has been borrowed in one particular year. Figure 2 (Federal
Debt as a Percentage of GDP, 19402010 ) shows the ratio of debt/GDP since 1940. Until the 1970s, the
debt/GDP ratio revealed a fairly clear pattern of federal borrowing. The government ran up large decits
and raised the debt/GDP ratio in World War II, but from the 1950s to the 1970s the government ran either
surpluses or relatively small decits, and so the debt/GDP ratio drifted down. Large decits in the 1980s
and early 1990s caused the ratio to rise sharply.
debt/GDP ratio declined substantially.
When budget surpluses arrived from 1998 to 2001, the
The budget decits starting in 2002 then tugged the debt/GDP
ratio higherwith a big jump when the recession took hold in 20082009.
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
3
Federal Debt as a Percentage of GDP, 19402010
Figure 2: Federal debt is the sum of annual budget decits and surpluses. Annual decits do not always
mean that the debt/GDP ratio is rising. During the 1960s and 1970s, the government often ran small
decits, but since the debt was growing more slowly than the economy, the debt/GDP ratio was declining
over this time. In the 20082009 recession, the debt/GDP ratio rose sharply. (Source: Economic Report
of the President, Table B-79, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ERP-2013/content-detail.html)
The next Clear it Up feature discusses how the government handles the national debt.
note:
One year's federal budget decit causes the federal government to sell Treasury bonds to
make up the dierence between spending programs and tax revenues. The dollar value of all the
outstanding Treasury bonds on which the federal government owes money is equal to the national
debt.
2 The Path from Decits to Surpluses to Decits
Why did the budget decits suddenly turn to surpluses from 1998 to 2001?
And why did the surpluses
return to decits in 2002? Why did the decit become so large after 2007? Figure 3 (Total Government
Spending and Taxes as a Share of GDP, 19902010 ) suggests some answers. The graph combines the earlier
information on total federal spending and taxes in a single graph, but focuses on the federal budget since
1990.
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
4
Total Government Spending and Taxes as a Share of GDP, 19902010
Figure 3: When government spending exceeds taxes, the gap is the budget decit. When taxes exceed
spending, the gap is a budget surplus. The recessionary period starting in late 2007 saw higher spending
and lower taxes, combining to create a large decit in 2009. (Source: Economic Report of the President,
Tables B-80, B-81, and B-1, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ERP-2013/content-detail.html)
Government spending as a share of GDP declined steadily through the 1990s. The biggest single reason
was that defense spending declined from 5.2% of GDP in 1990 to 3.0% in 2000, but interest payments by the
federal government also fell by about 1.0% of GDP. However, federal tax collections increased substantially
in the later 1990s, jumping from 18.1% of GDP in 1994 to 20.8% in 2000. Powerful economic growth in the
late 1990s fueled the boom in taxes. Personal income taxes rise as income goes up; payroll taxes rise as jobs
and payrolls go up; corporate income taxes rise as prots go up. At the same time, government spending
on transfer payments such as unemployment benets, foods stamps, and welfare declined with more people
working.
This sharp increase in tax revenues and decrease in expenditures on transfer payments was largely unexpected even by experienced budget analysts, and so budget surpluses came as a surprise. But in the early
2000s, many of these factors started running in reverse. Tax revenues sagged, due largely to the recession
that started in March 2001, which reduced revenues. A series of tax cuts was enacted by Congress and signed
into law by President George W. Bush, starting in 2001. In addition, government spending swelled due to
increases in defense, healthcare, education, Social Security, and support programs for those who were hurt
by the recession and the slow growth that followed. Decits returned. When the severe recession hit in late
2007, spending climbed and tax collections fell to historically unusual levels, resulting in enormous decits.
Longer-term forecasts of the U.S. budget, a decade or more into the future, predict enormous decits.
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
5
The higher decits run during the recession of 20082009 have repercussions, and the demographics will be
challenging. The primary reason is the baby boomthe exceptionally high birthrates that began in 1946,
right after World War II, and lasted for about two decades. Starting in 2010, the front edge of the baby
boom generation began to reach age 65, and in the next two decades, the proportion of Americans over the
age of 65 will increase substantially. The current level of the payroll taxes that support Social Security and
Medicare will fall well short of the projected expenses of these programs, as the following Clear It Up feature
shows; thus, the forecast is for large budget decits. A decision to collect more revenue to support these
programs or to decrease benet levels would alter this long-term forecast.
note:
In 1946, just one American in 13 was over age 65.
By 2000, it was one in eight.
By
2030, one American in ve will be over age 65. Two enormous U.S. federal programs focus on the
elderlySocial Security and Medicare.
The growing numbers of elderly Americans will increase
spending on these programs, as well as on Medicaid. The current payroll tax levied on workers,
which supports all of Social Security and the hospitalization insurance part of Medicare, will not
be enough to cover the expected costs. So, what are the options?
Long-term projections from the Congressional Budget Oce in 2009 are that Medicare and Social
Security spending combined will rise from 8.3% of GDP in 2009 to about 13% by 2035 and about
20% in 2080.
If this rise in spending occurs, without any corresponding rise in tax collections,
then some mix of changes must occur: (1) taxes will need to be increased dramatically; (2) other
spending will need to be cut dramatically; (3) the retirement age and/or age receiving Medicare
benets will need to increase, or (4) the federal government will need to run extremely large budget
decits.
Some proposals suggest removing the cap on wages subject to the payroll tax, so that those with
very high incomes would have to pay the tax on the entire amount of their wages. Other proposals
suggest moving Social Security and Medicare from systems in which workers pay for retirees toward
programs that set up accounts where workers save funds over their lifetimes and then draw out
after retirement to pay for healthcare.
The United States is not alone in this problem. Indeed, providing the promised level of retirement
and health benets to a growing proportion of elderly with a falling proportion of workers is an
even more severe problem in many European nations and in Japan. How to pay promised levels of
benets to the elderly will be a dicult public policy decision.
In the next module we shift to the use of scal policy to counteract business cycle uctuations. In addition,
we will explore proposals requiring a balanced budgetthat is, for government spending and taxes to be
equal each year. The Impacts of Government Borrowing will also cover how scal policy and government
borrowing will aect national savingand thus aect economic growth and trade imbalances.
3 Key Concepts and Summary
For most of the twentieth century, the U.S. government took on debt during wartime and then paid down
that debt slowly in peacetime. However, it took on quite substantial debts in peacetime in the 1980s and
early 1990s, before a brief period of budget surpluses from 1998 to 2001, followed by a return to annual
budget decits since 2002, with very large decits in the recession of 2008 and 2009. A budget decit or
budget surplus is measured annually. Total government debt or national debt is the sum of budget decits
and budget surpluses over time.
4 Self-Check Questions
Exercise 1
(Solution on p. 8.)
Debt has a certain self-reinforcing quality to it. There is one category of government spending that
automatically increases along with the federal debt. What is it?
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
Exercise 2
6
(Solution on p. 8.)
True or False:
a. Federal spending has grown substantially in recent decades.
b. By world standards, the U.S. government controls a relatively large share of the U.S. economy.
c. A majority of the federal government's revenue is collected through personal income taxes.
d. Education spending is slightly larger at the federal level than at the state and local level.
e. State and local government spending has not risen much in recent decades.
f. Defense spending is higher now than ever.
g. The share of the economy going to federal taxes has increased substantially over time.
h. Foreign aid is a large portion, although less than half, of federal spending.
i. Federal decits have been very large for the last two decades.
j. The accumulated federal debt as a share of GDP is near an all-time high.
5 Review Questions
Exercise 3
What has been the general pattern of U.S. budget decits in recent decades?
Exercise 4
What is the dierence between a budget decit and the national debt?
6 Critical Thinking Questions
Exercise 5
In a booming economy, is the federal government more likely to run surpluses or decits? What
are the various factors at play?
Exercise 6
Economist Arthur Laer famously pointed out that, in some cases, income tax revenue can actually
go up when tax rates go down. Why might this be the case?
Exercise 7
Is it possible for a nation to run budget decits and still have its debt/GDP ratio fall? Explain
your answer. Is it possible for a nation to run budget surpluses and still have its debt/GDP ratio
rise? Explain your answer.
7 Problems
Exercise 8
If a government runs a budget decit of $10 billion dollars each year for ten years, then a surplus of
$1 billion for ve years, and then a balanced budget for another ten years, what is the government
debt?
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
7
8 References
Eisner, Robert.
The Great Decit Scares: The Federal Budget, Trade, and Social Security.
New York:
Priority Press Publications, 1997.
Weisman, Jonathan, and Ashley Parker. Republicans Back Down, Ending Crisis Over Shutdown and
Debt Limit.
The New York Times,
October 16, 2013. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/us/congress-
budget-debate.html.
Wessel, David.
Red Ink: Inside the High-Stakes Politics of Federal Budget.
Group, 2013.
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/
New York: Crown Publishing
OpenStax-CNX module: m48794
8
Solutions to Exercises in this Module
Solution to Exercise (p. 5)
As debt increases, interest payments also rise, so that the decit grows even if we keep other government
spending constant.
Solution to Exercise (p. 6)
a. As a share of GDP, this is false. In nominal dollars, it is true.
b. False.
c. False.
d. False. Education spending is much higher at the state level.
e. False. As a share of GDP, it is up about 50.
f. As a share of GDP, this is false, and in real dollars, it is also false.
g. False.
h. False; it's about 1%.
i. False. Although budget decits were large in 2003 and 2004, and continued into the later 2000s, the
federal government ran budget surpluses from 19982001.
j. False.
Glossary
Denition 1: national debt
the total accumulated amount the government has borrowed, over time, and not yet paid back
http://cnx.org/content/m48794/1.4/