Download Total Assets

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Chapter Three
Financial Statement Analysis
Principles of Managerial Finance
First Canadian Edition
Lawrence J. Gitman and Sean Hennessey
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-1
Learning Goals
LG1 –
Introduce financial ratio analysis, three types of
ratio comparisons, and four categories of ratios.
LG2 – Analyze liquidity and effectiveness at managing
inventory, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, fixed and total assets.
LG3 – Discuss financial leverage, ratios used to assess
how assets were financed, and ability to cover
financing charges.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-2
Learning Goals (continued)
LG4 –
Evaluate profitability using common-size
analysis, and relative to sales, total assets,
common equity, and common share price.
LG5 – Explore link between various categories of
ratios, liquidity and activity ratios, leverage,
and profitability ratios.
LG6 – Use DuPont system and summary of financial
ratios to perform complete ratio analysis, with
caution.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-3
Using Financial Ratios
• Financial Ratios are measures of relative
values of key financial information.
• Ratio Analysis involves methods of calculating
and interpreting financial ratios to assess the
firm’s performance.
• Ratios are measured as (1) percentages; (2)
times or multiples; and (3) number of days.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-4
Parties interested in Ratios
• Ratios are of interest as key indicators of
financial health to:
–
–
–
–
shareholders,
creditors,
management, and
prospective investors.
• Ratio analysis directs attention to potential
areas of concern, but are not conclusive
evidence of problems.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-5
Types of Ratio Comparisons
• Cross-Sectional Analysis involves the
comparison of different firms at the same time.
– Benchmarking firm performance against industry
averages is very popular.
• Time-Series Analysis evaluates performance
over time, allowing for comparisons of current
and past ratio values.
• Combined Analysis mixes both features of
Cross-Sectional and Time Series Analysis.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-6
Categories of Financial Ratios
• Ratios are grouped into four basic
categories:
–
–
–
–
liquidity ratios,
activity ratios,
leverage ratios, and
profitability ratios.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-7
Analyzing Liquidity
• Liquidity refers to the firm’s ability to
satisfy its short-term obligations as they
come due.
• Three areas are of particular concern:
– Net Working Capital,
– The Current Ratio, and
– The Quick (Acid-Test) Ratio.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-8
Net Working Capital
• This measure of liquidity is simply a measure of
current assets minus liabilities.
Net Working Capital = Current Assets – Current Liabilities
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-9
Current Ratio
• Commonly used, the Current Ratio measures the
ability to meet short-term obligations.
Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-10
Quick (Acid Test) Ratio
• The Quick Ration focuses on only the most
liquid of the firm’s current assets: cash,
marketable securities, and accounts receivable.
Quick Ratio =
Cash+Marketable Securities+Accounts Receivable
Current Liabilities
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-11
Analyzing Activity
• Activity Ratios measure the effectiveness of
managing accounts receivable, inventory,
accounts payable, fixed assets, and total
assets.
• There are Activity Ratios for each of these
management issues.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-12
Average Age of Inventory
• This ratio measures the effective management of
inventory in terms of number of days inventory is
held.
Average Age of Inventory = Inventory
Daily COGS
Where Daily COGS equals the daily value of the Cost of
Goods Sold.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-13
Average Collection Period
• Useful for evaluating credit and collections
policies of the firm, this ratio is also
measured in days.
Average Collection Period = Accounts Receivable
Average Sales Per Day
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-14
Average Payment Period
• This ratio evaluates the speed of satisfying the
Accounts Payable for the firm.
Average Payment Period = Accounts Payable
Average Purchase Per Day
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-15
Fixed and Total Asset Turnover
• These ratios evaluate the use of Fixed and
Total Assets to generate Sales.
Fixed Asset Turnover =
Sales
Net Fixed Assets
Total Asset Turnover =
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Sales
Total Assets
3-16
Analyzing Leverage
• Leverage measures the amounts of
borrowed money being used by the firm.
• Leverage Ratios are classified as either
– Capitalization Ratios, focusing on how
investments are financed; or
– Coverage Ratios, focusing on the ability to
service the firm’s sources of financing.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-17
Debt Ratio
• The Debt Ratio measures the proportion of total
assets financed by creditors.
Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities/Total Assets
• The Preferred Equity Ratio shows only that
portion of total assets financed by preferred
shareholders.
• The Common Equity Ratio shows only that
portion of total assets financed by common
shareholders.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-18
Debt/Equity Ratio
• The popularly mentioned Debt/Equity Ratio
measures the proportion of long-term debt
to common equity of the firm.
Debt/Equity Ratio = Long-Term Debt
Common Equity
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-19
Times Interest Earned Ratio
• Also called the Interest Coverage Ratio, measures
the ability to make contractual interest payments.
Times Interest Earned = EBIT
Interest
Recall that EBIT stands for Earnings Before Interest and Taxes.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-20
Fixed-Charge Coverage Ratio
• This ratio measures the ability to meet all fixed
financial payments.
EBIT + Lease Payments
Interest + Lease Payments + ((1-T)*(Principal + Dividends))
Where T is the corporate tax rate.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-21
Analyzing Profitability
• There are many measures of the bottomline, the profitability of the firm.
• Four main measures examined here are:
–
–
–
–
Common-Size Income Statements,
Return on Total Assets,
Return on Equity, and
Price/Earnings Ratio.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-22
Common Size Income Statements
• Gross Margin measures the percentage of each sales
dollar after direct cost of goods have been paid.
• Operating Margin measures the percentage of each
sales dollar after all expenses associated with
producing, selling, and operating the company have
bee deducted (EBIT).
• Profit Margin measures the percentage of each sales
dollar after all expenses, including interest and taxes,
have been paid.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-23
Return on Total Assets (ROA)
• Also called Return On Investment,
measures the overall effectiveness in
generating profits with available assets.
ROA = Net Income After Taxes
Total Assets
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-24
Return on Equity (ROE)
• Measures the return earned on the owners’
investment in the firm.
ROE = Earnings Available for Common Shareholders
Common Equity
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-25
Earnings per Share (EPS)
• Represents the number of dollars earned on
behalf of each outstanding common share.
EPS = Earnings Available for Common Shareholders
Number of Common Shares Outstanding
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-26
Price/Earnings (P/E) Ratio
• This commonly used ratio is more an
appraisal of share value than directly of
profitability.
P/E Ratio = Market Price Per Common Share
Earnings Per Share
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-27
Leverage and Profitability
• Leverage is the advantage gained by using a
lever. In finance, debt financing is the
financial lever.
• Financial leverage allows the firm to
acquire assets beyond those available
through pure equity financing arrangements.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-28
Complete Ratio Analysis
• Investors and Analysts want to get a global
view of the various ratios in order to make
their overall assessment of a firm’s health.
• Two popular approaches are:
– The DuPont System of Analysis, and
– A summary analysis of all key ratios.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-29
DuPont System of Analysis
• Developed by the DuPont Corporation.
• The DuPont System merges Income
Statement and Balance Sheet into two
summary measures of profitability: ROA
and ROE.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-30
DuPont Formula
• The DuPont Formula links the Profit Margin
with Total Asset Turnover, as their underlying
formulas will summarize Return on Assets.
ROA = Profit Margin  Total Asset Turnover
• Since,
ROA = Net Income After Taxes 
Sales
Sales
Total Assets
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-31
Modified DuPont Formula
• The Financial Leverage Multiplier (FLM) is the
ratio of Total Assets to Shareholders’ Equity.
• The FLM transforms ROA into ROE.
ROE = ROA  FLM
• Since,
ROE = Net Income After Taxes 
Total Assets
Total Assets
Shareholders’ Equity
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-32
Summarizing All Ratios
• Simply preparing a table of the ratios from the
four key categories (liquidity, activity,
leverage, and profitability) over a multi-year
period allows for a quick and comprehensive
review of the firm’s performance.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-33
Table 3.7 Summary of Barlett
Company Liquidity Ratios
Ratio
Net Working
Capital
Industry Ave.
2002
$583,000 $521,000 $603,000
$427,000
2000
2001
2002
Current Ratio
2.04
2.08
1.97
2.05
Quick Ratio
1.32
1.46
1.51
1.43
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-34
Table 3.7 Summary of Barlett
Company Activity Ratios
Ratio
Ave. Age
Inventory
Ave.
Collection
Period
Ave. Payment
Period
Total Asset
Turnover
2000
2001
2002
Industry Ave.
2002
71.6
days
44.5
days
64
days
51.9
days
50.7
days
59.7
days
55.3 days
76.9
days
0.94
82.3
days
0.79
95.4
days
0.85
67.4 days
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
44.9 days
0.75
3-35
Table 3.7 Summary of Barlett
Company Leverage Ratios
Debt Ratio
36.8%
44.3%
Industry Ave.
2002
45.7%
40.0%
Debt/Equity
Ratio
43.5%
59.7%
58.3%
47.4%
5.6
3.3
4.5
4.3
2.4
1.4
1.9
1.5
Ratio
2000
Times Interest
Earned
Fixed Charge
Coverage
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2001
2002
3-36
Table 3.7 Summary of Barlett
Company Profitability Ratios
Ratio
2000 2001 2002 Industry Ave.
2002
Gross Margin
31.4% 33.3% 32.1%
30.0%
Operating Margin
14.6% 11.8% 13.6%
11.0%
Profit Margin
ROA
8.8%
8.3%
5.8%
4.5%
7.5%
6.4%
6.4%
4.8%
8.5% 12.6%
8.0%
ROE
14.1%
EPS
$3.26
$1.81
$2.90
$2.26
10.5
10.0
11.1
12.5
P/E Ratio
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-37
Cautions about Ratio Analysis
• A single ratio does not provide sufficient
information to judge overall performance.
• Financial statement comparisons should be dated
at the same point during the year.
• Audited Financial statements should be used for
calculating ratios.
• Data being compared should use the same
accounting rules applied.
• Time series comparisons of ratios may be distorted
by inflation.
• It is difficult to define categorically what a good or
bad ratio value should be.
© 2004 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
3-38