Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Probing Halos with PNe: Mass and Angular Momentum in Early-Type Galaxies Aaron J. Romanowsky Collaborators: N. Douglas, N. Napolitano (Kapteyn), K. Kuijken (Leiden) M. Merrifield, H. Merrett (Nottingham) PNe M. Arnaboldi (Torino), O. Gerhard (Basel) M. Capaccioli (Capodimonte), K. Freeman (RSAA) E. O’Sullivan (CfA), D. Forbes (Swinburne) X-ray T. Ponman, S. Raychaudhury (Birmingham) T. Richtler, D. Geisler, M. Gómez (Concepción) S. Zepf, G. Bergond (Michigan St), R. Sharples (Durham) M. Hilker, Y. Schuberth (Bonn), L. Infante (PUC) GCs M. Kissler-Patig (ESO), K. Rhode (Wesleyan) Probes of early-type galaxy haloes Apparent inconsistency with galaxy formation theory: PN dynamics show low DM content in L* Es But some other observations don‘t support this: weak lensing, satellite dynamics, most strong lenses show much higher DM content better statistics with larger PN galaxy sample check independent mass probes (GCs, Xrays) if consistent and reliable, can combine for much stronger constraints on mass, orbit distributions PN.S: primary mission targets N4552 NGC 4636 N4564 N4339 N4551 Cluster Population 1 (disky/faint) N4494 N3377 N4374 Population 2 (boxy/bright) N4742 N3379 Group N4278 N5576 NGC 3379: Dispersion profile long-slit data (Statler & SmeckerHane 1999) 197 PNe Isotropic Jeans models: singular isothermal halo constant-M/L Hernquist model NGC 3379: orbit models Orbit stacking/fitting method fully includes uncertainty in orbital anisotropy variations: • cumulative M/L at 5 Reff : • cf. models of stellar pop M/L: = 7.1 0.6 =4-9 face-on S0 rather than round elliptical? • disklike kinematics not seen in inner parts (Statler 2001) • see also independent tracers (GCs, HI, Xrays) Probing E haloes with X-rays Chandra, XMM-Newton: large area, high ang resolution find T(r), remove point sources, check equilibrium important to not select on LX (bias in mass results!) NGC 4365 NGC 4382 Chandra ACIS-S (Sivakoff, Sarazin & Irwin 2003) Probing E haloes w/ globular clusters GCs as dynamical tracers: • bright: V = 21-25 in Virgo Cluster • GC systems more spatially extended than stellar light • new spectrographs (wide-field, multi-object): UT2+FLAMES, UT3+VIMOS, Baade+IMACS, Gemini+GMOS, Keck+DEIMOS • probe formational histories of halos: GC formation scenarios generically predict metal-rich GCs have same metallicities, NGC 3379 : circular velocity profile X-rays from Chandra+ACIS (O’Sullivan et al.) PNe 34 GCs from UT2+FLAMES/ GIRAFFE (Bergond et al.) consistent w/ 22 GCs from Gemini+GMOS (Beasley et al.) const M/L NGC 3379: circular velocity profile HI measurement of mass of N3379 + N3384: (M/L) B,vir = 27 5 (Schneider 1991) PNe Probes of early-type galaxy haloes • NGC 1399 (Ikebe et al. 1996; Jones et al. 1997; Paolillo et al. 2002; Napolitano et al. 2002; Richtler et al 2004) • NGC 3379 • NGC 4472 (Schindler et al. 1999; Kronawitter et al. 2002) • NGC 4486 (Romanowsky & Kochanek 2001; Matsushita et al. 2002) • NGC 4636 (Matsushita et al. 1998; Kronawitter et al. 2000; Loewenstein & Mushotzky 2002; Schuberth et al. 2004) • NGC 5128 (Peng, Ford & Freeman 2004) PN, GC, X-ray mass measurements so far Combined dispersion profiles NGC 821, NGC 3379, NGC 4494, NGC 4697 (Méndez et al. 2001): p(R) declining with R Isotropic singular isothermal halo Isotropic constant-M/L Hernquist model X-ray studies of low-luminosity Es All four low-DM galaxies have low LX Low LX consistent with low DM content (O’Sullivan & Ponman 2004) NGC 4697 total LX NGC 3379 Need larger sample size to ensure we weren’t unlucky with L selection NGC 821 soft LX Explanations Population of ordinary ellipticals with low DM content cf. NGC 5128: (M/L)B ~ 18 at Rvir (Peng, Ford & Freeman 2004) • face-on S0s ? unlikely • stripped DM halos ? unpredicted • MOdified Newtonian Dynamics ? inconsistent • low (M/L)* or steep (M/L)* gradient ? implausible • low concentration halos ? arguable Stellar population gradients If stars younger and/or metal-poor in halo: (M/L)* lower, allows more DM contribution to (M/L)dyn NGC 3379 Mg2 , Fe line strength gradients (Davies, Sadler & Peletier 1993): [Fe/H] / log10 r ~ -0.3 (typical for ellipticals) Within 5 Reff : 10% lower M*, 40% higher MDM For MDM=M* at 5 Reff, need [Fe/H] / log10 r ~ -1.4 NGC 3379 RGB CMD from HST+NICMOS (Gregg et al. 2004): • mean halo abundance ~ Solar, no change w/ radius • mean age ~ 8-15 Gyr, no evidence for < 5 Gyr pop Low concentrations / central DM content PN results for N3379 vs CDM predictions (Bullock et al. 2001) CDM + early gas outflow, WDM, SIDM, TCDM, RDM, DDM, SADM, FDM...? c200 too low unless star formation efficiency > 100% Low halo densities: • LSBs • fundamental plane of ellipticals (Borriello, Salucci & Danese 2003) • strong gravitational lenses (Rusin, Kochanek & Keeton 2003) Angular momentum Dissipationless mergers transfer angular momentum to outer parts (Weil & Hernquist 1996; Bendo & Barnes 2000) v / ~ 1 for R > 2 Reff NGC 5128 Elliptical PN results (NGCs 821, 3379, 4472, 4486, 4494) no evidence of merger-induced spin-up Observed discrepancy between spirals and E centres Angular momentum Simulated E/S0s (Sommer-Larsen et al. 2003; Meza et al. 2003; Wright et al. 2004) E observations at large R M M87: Angular momentum GCs show v / ~ 0.7, ~ 0.2 ( /support ) in outer parts (Kissler-Patig & Gebhardt 1998) PNe: v / ~ 0.2, ~ 0.05 cf. CDM sims: ~ 0.05 (Bullock et al. 2001) NGC 5128: Angular momentum PNe have stronger rotation than GCs (Peng, Ford & Freeman 2004) NGC 4472: Angular momentum 87 velocities to ~10 Reff with UT2+FLAMES/ GIRAFFE; Bergond et al. GCs rotation axis twists by 180° PNe have similar (low) rotation to GCs Several cases where GCs rotation weaker / stronger / similar to PNe Expected correlation between stars, metal-rich GCs not generally seen! Summary • Multiple lines of evidence for low DM in NGC 3379 • Independent mass tracers generally consistent • Pop of L* ellipticals with low DM content • E halo stars rotate much slower than spirals • GC rotation not correlated with stars