Download 3D Bioprinting For Cartilage

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
3D Bioprinting For Cartilage
Lillian Margolis
Biomedical Engineering
October 21, 2015
Introduction
• Tissue Engineering
– Study of growth of
connective tissue
– Repair or replace tissue
• Cartilage
– Connective tissue
– Avascular
– Three Types: Hyaline,
Elastic, and Fibrous
• 3D Bioprinting: scaffolds and
bio-ink
[1]
[2]
Methods
• Scaffolds: three
dimensional polymer
mold that guides the
tissue as it cultures and
grows
– Mesenchymal stem cells
– Chemical cues to mimic
the original tissue
[3]
[3]
Methods
• 3D Bioprinting: directly repair or recreate
cartilage and integrates with original cartilage
– Sizes of tissues printed: under 400 micrometers
– 5 options
• Extrusion
• Laser
• Inkjet
• Thermal Inkjet
• Piezoelectric Inkjet
[4]
[5]
Studies
• Thermal Inkjet Study (Human)
– Layer by layer, articular cartilage, and polyethylene glycol
dimethacrylate
– 4mm diameter, thickness of 2mm, nominal 0.23 microliters bioink
– ~1140 chondrocytes
– Each layer printed and photopolymerized, 18micrometers thick
– 2 mins total printing time
– Printed cartilage with 3d biopaper had higher levels of
glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content than cartilage printed without
– Result: Importance of direct cartilage repair; success in
placement of individual cells, preserving cell viability, maintaining
chondrogenic phenotype, and integrating with original tissue
tissue
[5]
Studies
• 4 Bioinks: Ink9010, Ink8020, Ink7030, and Ink6040
• Printed small grids with the four different bioinks and
crossed-linked them with CaCl2 for 10 mins
• Compression testing and shape fidelity testing
• The different ink compositions can be used for different
printing depending on mechanical properties
[6]
[6]
[6]
Conclusion
• Thermal Inkjet Bioprinting
– Print both soft and hard tissue
– Best option for repairing cartilage
• Ink8020 is most suitable bioink for printing
• Future
– Optimizing scaffolds
– Targeted Drug Therapy
– Gene Transfection
[YW]
Questions?
[1]
Resources Besides the Ones in the Abstract
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
(n.d.). Retrieved October 17, 2015, from
http://www.millerplace.k12.ny.us/webpages/lmiller/photos/636532/large23_Cartilage Types.jpg
W HAT IS TISSUE ENGINEERING. (N.D.). RETRIEVED OCTOBER 17, 2015, FROM HTTP://WWW.RPI.EDU/DEPT/CHEMENG/BIOTECH-ENVIRON/PROJECTS00/TISSUE/W HAT IS TISSUE ENGINEERING.HTM
Camarero-Espinosa, S., Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Weder, C., & Foster, E. (2015). Directed cell growth in multi-zonal
scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 42-52. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.033
Murphy, S., & Atala, A. (2014). 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol Nature Biotechnology, 773-785.
doi:10.1038/nbt.2958
Gao, G., & Cui, X. (2015). Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Biotechnology Letters, 1-9. doi:10.1007/s10529-015-1975-1
Markstedt, K., Mantas, A., Tournier, I., Ávila, H., Hägg, D., & Gatenholm, P. (2015). 3D Bioprinting Human
Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose–Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. BioMacroMolecules,
1489-1496. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188
Digital image. University of Rhode Island. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.uri.edu/news/releases/html/images/rhody.jpg>.
Related documents