Download PPT - TTU Physics

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Dynamic and Spatial Properties of Satellites
in Isolated Galactic Systems
Abel B. Diaz
Presentation Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rotation Curves: Probing the mass distribution
The Problem
Rotation Curves of Isolated Galaxy Systems
Stellar properties of Satellites
The Holmberg effect
2D Rotation Curve
Rotation Curves:
Probing the mass distribution
• Within Galaxy
– Well known
• External to Galaxy
– Not well known
Fritz Zwicky (1933)
Babcock (1939)&Vera Rubin (1970)
The Problem
• How does the mass distribution of galaxies
change with distance beyond the disk of
the galaxy?
What would this tell us?
• Learning more about the mass distribution
of isolated galaxies may provide insight
into galaxy
– formation
– evolution
– LSS
So how can this be done?
• Rotation Curves of Isolated Galaxy Systems
– Dominate source of gravitation
• The center-of-mass of the system is located at center
of “primary” galaxy
– Satellites relatively small compared to primary
• Maintains center-of-mass located at the center of
primary
Limits on Isolated Galaxies
1. Small number of detectable satellites
2. Line-of-sight velocity
3. Projected distance
Isolated Galaxy Ensembles
Interlopers
• Observed redshift = cosmological redshift + Doppler redshift
• The peculiar velocities of the satellites can be on the order of
400km/s
• Uncertainty of distance along the line-of-sight
Velocity Dispersions
McKay (2002), Prada et al (2003),
and Brainerd (2004)
The Data Sample
• New York University Value-Added Galaxy
Catalog (NYU-VAGC)
– Lowz (Sub Sample of ~50,000 galaxies)
Ensembles
Robust Analysis
Velocity Dispersion Curve
Prada et al (2003), and Brainerd (2004)
Galaxies Types
Early vs. Late
• Early type galaxies have
larger halos than late type
galaxies
• Conroy et al. (2007)
What These Results Tell Us
• Rotation curve (consistent with NFW)
– Supports hierarchical scenario
• Halo sizes
– Larger primordial dark matter halos for early
type galaxies than for late type galaxies
Stellar Properties
• How does the satellite stellar properties change
as a function of distance from the primary?
– Star formation from self gravity or tidal effects from
primary
Stellar properties of Satellites
What Does This Mean
• Primaries cause "tidal" effects on their
satellites
– Kosh and Grebal (2006)
• More pronounced in satellites with
primaries that have a larger mass (halo)
• Different distribution in Systems at larger z
(longer ago)
The Holmberg Effect
Holmberg (1969)
Modeling
• Check for Isotropy
– polar fraction ~0.70
– Mean f = 45 degrees
• Interloper check
– P/T >> 0.5
Results for Primary tilt < 30o
No Holmberg found in my data
f  45.5
o
Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test
Results for Varying tilts angle
No Holmberg found in my data
Binned Results for Primary tilt < 30o
Brainerd (2005)
Sales & Lambas (2004), Koch & Grebel (2006)
Zaritsky et al. (1997)
Binned Results for Primary tilt > 60o
What does this tell us?
• Dark Matter halo
– Spherical
• Puts constraints on models
– Infall through fillaments
2D Velocity Dispersions
• Velocity Distribution
– Isotropic about primary
tilt ~ 45
• DM halo
– Spherical
2
R    f2 sin 2 i   z2 cos 2 i
 maj
2
R cos i    R2 sin 2 i   z2 cos 2 i
 min
tilt ~ 45
Conclusion
• The Dynamic Properties
– Dark Matter Halos
• Different sizes for different type of galaxies
• Consistent with NFW (hierarchical scenario)
• The Spatial Properties
– Satellites are isotropically distributed, and
have isotropic velocity distribution
• Spherical Dark Matter Halo
– Star formation depends on distance from their
primary
• Primaries effect their satellites
Related documents