Download Foreign Currency Options II

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Foreign Currency
Options II
©1998-2003
1
1. Using Options for Hedging
©1998-2003
The set up (Using calls)
• A U.S. importer must pay CHF250,000
• The payment will occur in late September
• The importer is concerned that CHF may
appreciate against the dollar so that its dollardenominated payment may increase.
©1998-2003
What to do today?
• On July 16 the importer can buy 4 PHLX calls
on the Swiss francs (CHF62,500 per contract),
CHF250,000  4  CHF62,500
• Pay $2,625 for 4 contracts (1.05 cents per CHF)
$2,625/CHF 250,000  $0.0105/CHF
• The strike price X of a call is $/CHF0.58 and its
expiration date is in September
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 1
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5790
• Since S < X, Max{(S - X), 0} = 0, the intrinsic
(and total) value is 0
• The option will not be exercised, i.e. it expires
worthless
• The importer incurs a total loss (or more
precisely a hedging cost) of $2,625 which was
paid initially for 4 call options
• The profit for the underwriter (the counterparty
of the option contract) is $2,625
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 2
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5820
• Since S > X, Max{(S - X), 0} = $0.0020, the
intrinsic value is 0.20 cents per Swiss franc
• The U.S. importer exercises the option and gets
$500  $0.0020CHF  CHF250,000
• The importer incurs a total net loss (hedging
cost) of $2,125:
$2,125  $2,620  $500
• The underwriter’s profit is $2,125
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 3
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5920
• Since S > X, Max{(S - X), 0} = $0.0120, the
intrinsic value is 1.20 cents per Swiss franc
• The U.S. importer exercises the option and gets
$3,000  0.0120$/CHF  CHF250,000
• The importer has a total net gain of $375:
$375  $3,000  $2,625
• The underwriter’s loss is $375
©1998-2003
Call option on a diagram
Option
profit
cents/CHF
Strike price
Long call
Profit
0
Limited Profit
$/CHF spot rate
Limited loss
Loss
0.58
“At the money”
©1998-2003
Short call
The Set up (Using puts)
• An American exporter will receive CHF250,000
• The receipt will occur in late September
• The exporter is concerned that CHF may
depreciate against the dollar so that its dollardenominated cash inflow may be reduced.
©1998-2003
What to do today?
• On July 16 the exporter can buy 4 PHLX puts on
the Swiss Frank (CHF62,500 per contract),
CHF250,000  4  62,500
• Pay $2,225 for 4 contracts (0.89 cents per CHF)
$2,225/CHF 250,000  $0.0089
• The strike price of a put is $0.58 and its
expiration date is in September
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 1
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5810
• Since S > X, Max{(X - S), 0} = 0, the intrinsic
(and total) value is 0
• The option will not be exercised
• The exporter incurs a total loss of $2,225 which
was paid initially for 4 put options
• The underwriter’s profit is $2,225
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 2
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5780
• Since S < X, Max{(X - S), 0} = $0.0020, the
intrinsic value is 0.20 cents per Swiss franc.
• The U.S. exporter exercises the option and gets
$500  0.0020$/CHF  CHF250,000
• The exporter incurs a total net loss of $1,725:
$1,725  $2,225  $500
• The underwriter’s profit is $1,725
©1998-2003
Expiration: scenario 3
• The spot price of CHF at expiration is $0.5680
• Since S < X, Max{(S - X), 0} = $0.0120, the
intrinsic value is 1.20 cents per Swiss franc
• The U.S. exporter exercises the option and gets
$3,000  0.0120$/CHF  CHF250,000
• The exporter has a total net gain of $775:
$775  $3,000  $2,225
• The underwriter’s loss is $775
©1998-2003
Put option on a diagram
Option
profit
cents/CHF
Strike price
Short put
Profit
Limited Profit
Limited loss
Loss
Long put
0.58
“At the money”
©1998-2003
$/CHF spot rate
Alternative strategies: Forwards
and futures
• Forwards and futures offer a protection against
exchange rate risk exposure at the lowest cost.
• Options offer a protection at a premium.
• Forwards and futures eliminate any upside
(positive) impact of the exchange rate risk.
• Options do not eliminate the upside (positive)
impact of the exchange rate risk.
©1998-2003
The set up
(Using options or futures)
• On July 1, an American company makes a sale
for which is will receive CHF125,000 on
September 1.
• The spot price of CHF is $0.6922.
• The firm wants to protect itself against a
declining Swiss franc by selling its expected
CHF receipts forward (using a futures contract)
or by buying (long) a CHF put option.
©1998-2003
The menu of strategies
• Do nothing and take the risk of declining
value of the Swiss Franc mark against
U.S. dollar
• Sell a September futures contract
• Buy a put option
©1998-2003
Scenario 1: depreciating CHF
July 1
Spot
September futures
September 68 long put
September 70 long put
$0.6922
$0.6956
$0.0059
$0.0144
©1998-2003
September 1
$0.6542
$0.6558
$0.0250
$0.0447
Scenario 1: Strategies 1 & 2
• With do nothing strategy, the company will incur
a loss of $4,750
$4,750  (0.6922  0.6542)$/C HF  CHF125,000
• With selling short a futures contract, the
company will
– loose $4,750 in the spot market
– gain $4,975 in the futures market
$4,975  (0.6956  0.6558)$/C HF  CHF125,000
– net profit $225
©1998-2003
Scenario 1: Strategy 3.1
• With buying September 68 put options, the
company will
– loose $4,750 in the spot market
– gain $2,387.50 in the option market
(exercising the put)
$2,387.50  $(0.0250  0.0059)CHF  CHF125,000
– incur a net loss of $2,362.50
©1998-2003
Scenario 1: Strategy 3.2
• With buying September 70 put options, the
company will gain
– loose $4,750 in the spot market
– gain $3,787.50 in the option market (selling
put)
$3,787.50  $(0.0447  0.0144)CHF  CHF125,000
– Incur a net loss of $962.50
©1998-2003
Scenario 2: appreciating CHF
July 1
Spot
September futures
September 68 put
September 70 put
$0.6922
$0.6956
$0.0059
$0.0144
©1998-2003
September 1
$0.7338
$0.7374
$0.0001
$0.0001
Scenario 2: Strategies 1 & 2
• With do nothing strategy, the company will have
a gain of $5,200
$5200  (0.7338  0.6922)$/C HF  CHF125,000
• With selling short a futures contract, the
company will
– gain $5,200 in the spot market
– loose $5,225 in the futures market
$5,225  (0.7374  0.6956)$/C HF  CHF125,000
– net loss $25
©1998-2003
Scenario 2: Strategy 3.1
• With buying September 68 put options, the
company will
– gain $5,200 in the spot market
– loose $725 in the option market (selling put)
$725  $(0.0059  0.0001)CHF  CHF125,000
– net gain $4,475
©1998-2003
Scenario 2: Strategy 3.2
• With buying September 70 put options, the
company will
– gain $5,200 in the spot market
– loose $1,787.50 in the option market (selling
put)
$1,787.50  $(0.0144  0.0001)CHF  CHF125,000
– net gain of $3412.50
©1998-2003
The summary table
Position
Unhedged
Short futures
Long 68 put
Long 70 put
CHF depreciates
CHF appreciates
$4,750 loss
$225 gain
$2,050 loss
$800 loss
$5,200 gain
$25 loss
$4,475 gain
$3,412.50 gain
©1998-2003
Concluding remarks
• There is no absolute best hedging strategy
• The choice of a specific hedge strategy is
dictated by many factors, including:
amount of foreign currency needed to be hedged
– availability of funds for paying the option’s premium
– characteristics and availability of derivatives contracts
– a company’s expectations about future exchange rate
changes
– hedging habit & corporate culture
©1998-2003
Related documents