Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Public – Civic Strategic Partnership for Social Economy in Poland. Transferability, tools & clarifications, keywords, criteria Krzysztof Herbst 1. Process – es and risks • Society: Heritage, recent heritage (momentum), new movements – Cooperative movements (traditional, biased, new) – Civil society (Social Capital, Community) – New: Grassroots movements, Urban movements, Informal • Economy – a base of social reintegration – – – – • Logic, integrity, efficiency and common sense (SE - domain of the gifted people) Community embedded SE as ressource/asset generator (independent, embedded) SE vs. current trends in economy (restructuring, networking) Public administration model/algorithm and partnershi-bility: rowing, steering, leading – Micromanagement, overdrive (procedures and criteriae) – Silo segmentation – Shared (?) competences and values • living with EU-litics…. Change enforcement, but… – Service delivery or integration oriented – Silo effect generator, Goldplatting (financing, public procurement, separating soft and hard areas) – Community dimension gap (Territorialism) Encouraging initiatives (conferences, reports) 2. Partnership in action • Initiators: – „Public” - community of values, Stakeholders, Clients? – Leaders - mission, personal relations? (below the Cabinet level) • Triggering moments (Equal + heritage for Poland) – Tidal nature of the process, risks of discontinuin • Partnership: – Towards defined objective? – „Before the politics” drafting policies. Leadership interleaves with administrative verticals. – How far from public – social partnership? • How legitimate / representative ? Federation? 3. Understanding the clockwork 3.1. SE and CS in policy papers - a coil spring Job creation Regional development Social Integration Local Development Social Capital Services of Public benefit 3.2. Social Capital / Community Community Process Administrative Process Policy defined Strong Community High Social Capital Administrative adjustment (blueprints, by-laws ,routines, procedures) Improvement in participation, governance, contractin – out and partnerships Succesful Social Economy – a partner to the politician 4. Strategy / lesson for transferability Mainstreaming, VIP-streaming • End of Copy / paste? • Politics, policies, standard syllabus, mission? Territoriality • Co-planning • Partnerships Result focus • Support centres • Silo threshold: Territorial self-governments, Restructuring, Labour administration, Entrepreneurship (economy). Instruments (summary) • Co-planning Strategy (KPRES – NPSED), – local / regional strategies • • • • • • Council, Secretariat Pact: Contract or Compact (Local Govt’s, Reg. Contracts, see employment pacts. Reliablity) Social Enterprise Act Support centres (mass turns quality) Education (incl civic education) Financing – grants, loan scheme, guarantees, – sector assets, private assests, grassroot financing, corporate social responsiblity and giving SKES and other platforms (White Book, watchdog, initiating/leading)