Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Energy Economics and Policy Spring 2012 Instructors: Chu Xiaodong , Zhang Wen Email:[email protected], [email protected] Office Tel.: 81696127 09 Pure Competition in the Short Run McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Four Market Models • Pure competition • Pure monopoly • Monopolistic competition • Oligopoly Pure Competition Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Pure Monopoly Market Structure Continuum LO1 8-3 Four Market Models Characteristics of the Four Basic Market Models Pure Characteristic Competition Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly Monopoly Number of firms A very large number Many Few One Type of product Standardized Differentiated Standardized or differentiated Unique; no close subs. Control over price None Some, but within rather narrow limits Limited by mutual inter-dependence; considerable with collusion Considerable Conditions of entry Very easy, no obstacles Relatively easy Significant obstacles Blocked Nonprice Competition None Considerable emphasis on advertising, brand names, trademarks Typically a great deal, particularly with product differentiation Mostly public relation advertising Examples Agriculture Retail trade, dresses, shoes Steel, auto, farm implements Local utilities LO1 8-4 Pure Competition: Characteristics • Very large numbers of sellers • Standardized product • “Price takers” • Easy entry and exit • Perfectly elastic demand • Firm produces as much or little as they want at the price • Demand graphs as horizontal line LO2 8-5 Average, Total, and Marginal Revenue • Average Revenue • Revenue per unit • AR = TR/Q = P • Total Revenue • TR = P X Q • Marginal Revenue • Extra revenue from 1 more unit • MR = ΔTR/ΔQ LO3 8-6 Average, Total, and Marginal Revenue Firm’s Demand Schedule (Average Revenue) QD P Firm’s Revenue Data TR MR 0 $131 $0 ] $131 1 131 131 ] 131 2 131 262 ] 131 3 131 393 ] 131 4 131 524 ] 131 5 131 655 ] 131 6 131 786 ] 131 7 131 917 ] 131 8 131 1048 ] 131 9 131 1179 131 10 131 1310 ] LO3 TR P = MR = AR 8-7 Profit Maximization: TR–TC Approach • Three questions: • Should the firm produce? • If so, what amount? • What economic profit (loss) will be realized? LO3 8-8 Profit Maximization: TR–TC Approach The Profit-Maximizing Output for a Purely Competitive Firm: Total Revenue – Total Cost Approach (Price = $131) (1) Total Product (Output) (Q) (2) Total Fixed Cost (TFC) (3) Total Variable Costs (TVC) (4) Total Cost (TC) (5) Total Revenue (TR) (6) Profit (+) or Loss (-) 0 $100 $0 $100 $0 $-100 1 100 90 190 131 -59 2 100 170 270 262 -8 3 100 240 340 393 +53 4 100 300 400 524 +124 5 100 370 470 655 +185 6 100 450 550 786 +236 7 100 540 640 917 +277 8 100 650 750 1048 +298 9 100 780 880 1179 +299 10 100 930 1030 1310 +280 LO3 8-9 Profit Maximization: TR–TC Approach Total Economic Profit Total Revenue and Total Cost $1800 1700 1600 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 LO3 Break-Even Point (Normal Profit) Total Revenue, (TR) Maximum Economic Profit $299 Total Cost, (TC) P=$131 Break-Even Point (Normal Profit) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantity Demanded (Sold) $500 400 300 200 100 Total Economic Profit $299 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Quantity Demanded (Sold) 8-10 Profit Maximization: MR-MC Approach The Profit-Maximizing Output for a Purely Competitive Firm: Marginal Revenue – Marginal Cost Approach (Price = $131) (1) Total Product (Output) (2) Average Fixed Cost (AFC) (3) Average Variable Costs (AVC) (4) Average Total Cost (ATC) (5) Marginal Cost (MC) (5) Price = Marginal Revenue (MR) 0 LO3 (6) Total Economic Profit (+) or Loss (-) $-100 1 $100.00 $90.00 $190 $90 $131 -59 2 50.00 85.00 135 80 131 -8 3 33.33 80.00 113.33 70 131 +53 4 25.00 75.00 100.00 60 131 +124 5 20.00 74.00 94.00 70 131 +185 6 16.67 75.00 91.67 80 131 +236 7 14.29 77.14 91.43 90 131 +277 8 12.50 81.25 93.75 110 131 +298 9 11.11 86.67 97.78 130 131 +299 10 10.00 93.00 103.00 150 131 +280 8-11 Profit Maximization: MR-MC Approach Cost and Revenue $200 MR = MC 150 MC P=$131 MR = P ATC Economic Profit 100 AVC A=$97.78 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Output LO3 8-12 Loss-Minimizing Case • Loss minimization • Still produce because P > minAVC • Losses at a minimum where MR=MC LO3 8-13 Loss-Minimizing Case Cost and Revenue $200 MC 150 Loss A=$91.67 ATC AVC 100 P=$81 50 0 MR = P V = $75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Output LO3 8-14 Shutdown Case Cost and Revenue $200 MC 150 ATC V = $74 100 AVC MR = P P=$71 Short-Run Shut Down Point P < Minimum AVC $71 < $74 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Output LO3 8-15 Three Production Questions Output Determination in Pure Competition in the Short Run LO3 Question Answer Should this firm produce? Yes, if price is equal to, or greater than, minimum average variable cost. This means that the firm is profitable or that its losses are less than its fixed cost. What quantity should this firm produce? Produce where MR (=P) = MC; there, profit is maximized (TR exceeds TC by a maximum amount) or loss is minimized. Will production result in economic profit? Yes, if price exceeds average total cost (TR will exceed TC). No, if average total cost exceeds price (TC will exceed TR). 8-16 Firm and Industry: Equilibrium Firm and Market Supply and the Market Demand LO4 (1) Quantity Supplied, Single Firm (2) Total Quantity Supplied, 1000 Firms (3) Product Price (4) Total Quantity Demanded 10 10,000 $151 4,000 9 9,000 131 6,000 8 8,000 111 8,000 7 7,000 91 9,000 6 6,000 81 11,000 0 0 71 13,000 0 0 61 16,000 8-17 Firm and Industry: Equilibrium S = ∑ MC’s s = MC Economic Profit ATC d $111 $111 AVC D 8 LO4 8000 8-18 09 Pure Competition in the Long Run McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Long Run in Pure Competition • In the long run • Firms can expand or contract capacity • Firms enter and exit the industry LO1 9-20 Profit Maximization in the Long Run • Easy entry and exit • The only long-run adjustment we consider • Identical costs • All firms in the industry have identical • LO2 costs Constant-cost industry • Entry and exit do not affect resource prices 9-21 Long-Run Equilibrium • Entry eliminates profits • Firms enter • Supply increases • Price falls • Exit eliminates losses • Firms exit • Supply decreases • Price rises LO3 9-22 Entry Eliminates Economic Profits P P S1 MC ATC $60 50 MR 40 S2 $60 50 D2 40 D1 0 100 (a) Single Firm LO3 q 0 80,000 90,000 100,000 Q (b) Industry 9-23 Exit Eliminates Losses P P S3 MC ATC $60 S1 $60 50 50 MR D1 40 40 D3 0 100 (a) Single Firm LO3 q 0 80,000 90,000 100,000 Q (b) Industry 9-24 • • • LO4 Long Run Supply Constant cost industry • Entry/exit does not affect LR ATC • Constant resource price • Special case Increasing cost industry • Most industries • LR ATC increases with expansion • Specialized resources Decreasing cost industry 9-25 LR Supply: Constant-Cost Industry P P1 P2 $50 Z3 Z1 Z2 S P3 D1 D3 0 LO4 Q3 90,000 Q1 100,000 D2 Q2 110,000 Q 9-26 LR Supply: Increasing-Cost Industry P S P2 $55 Y2 P1 $50 Y1 P3 $40 Y3 D2 D1 D3 0 LO4 Q3 90,000 Q1 100,000 Q2 110,000 Q 9-27 LR Supply: Decreasing-Cost Industry P P3 $55 X3 X1 P1 $50 X2 P2 $40 D3 S D2 D1 0 LO4 Q3 90,000 Q1 100,000 Q2 110,000 Q 9-28 Pure Competition and Efficiency • In the long run, efficiency is achieved • Productive efficiency • Producing where P = min. ATC • Allocative efficiency • Producing where P = MC LO5 9-29 Pure Competition and Efficiency Single Firm Market P=MC=Minimum ATC (Normal Profit) MC Consumer Surplus S Price Price ATC P MR P Producer Surplus D 0 LO5 Qf Quantity 0 Qe Quantity 9-30 Dynamic Adjustments • Purely competitive markets will • LO6 automatically adjust to • Changes in consumer tastes • Resource supplies • Technology Recall the “Invisible Hand” 9-31 Technological Advance: Competition • Entrepreneurs would like to increase profits beyond just a normal profit • Decrease costs by innovation • New product development LO6 9-32 Creative Destruction • Competition and innovation may lead to “creative destruction” • Creation of new products and methods destroys the old products and methods LO6 9-33 Efficiency Gains from Entry • Patent protected prescription drugs earn • substantial economic profits for the pharmaceutical company Generic drugs become available as the patent expires on the existing drug • Results in a 30-40% reduction price • Greater consumer surplus and efficiency 9-34 Efficiency Gains from Entry a S P1 b c d f P2 D Q1 Q2 9-35 Next Lecture • We will move to the other two market models: pure monopoly and oligopoly • Please read in advance chapters 10 and 11 of [McConnell, Brue, and Flynn, 2012]