Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer Clinical audit tool Implementing NICE guidance 2012 Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 1 ofappraisals 13 NICE clinical guideline 131 and technology 242, 212, 176 and 118 This clinical audit tool accompanies the NICE guidance: ‘Colorectal cancer: the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer’ ‘Bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer’ ‘Cetuximab for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer‘ ‘Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and either fluorouracil plus folinic acid or capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer‘ ‘Cetuximab (monotherapy or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (in combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy’ Issue date: 2012 This clinical audit tool replaces the colorectal cancer: chemotherapy clinical audit tool published in November 2011 to differentiate between chemotherapy and biological agents in accordance with the colorectal cancer pathway. This document is a support tool for clinical audit based on the NICE guidance. It is not NICE guidance. Acknowledgements NICE would like to thank the following people who have contributed to the development of this clinical audit tool and have agreed to be acknowledged: Dave Asplin, Pathology Quality Manager, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust Christine Holman, National Collaborating Centre for cancer Stephanie Loveridge, Clinical Governance Manager, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Dr Sundar Santhanam, Consultant Oncologist, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 2 of 13 NICE has adapted the action plan template produced by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) in their template clinical audit report. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Level 1A, City Tower, Piccadilly Plaza, Manchester M1 4BT; www.nice.org.uk © National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2012. All rights reserved. This material may be freely reproduced for educational and not-for-profit purposes. No reproduction by or for commercial organisations, or for commercial purposes, is allowed without the express written permission of NICE. Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 3 of 13 Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer clinical audit tool This document can be used as a starting point for a local clinical audit project that aims to improve biological agent prescribing practices for patients with advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer. It contains: clinical audit standards a data collection form an action plan template. There is also an electronic audit tool available, which can be used with this document or on its own to collect and analyse the data. The audit standards and data collection form can be adapted to focus on a smaller part of the tool or expanded to include other local priorities. The audit could be carried out in the following services: secondary or tertiary care, including specialist cancer services. The audit should involve clinical and non-clinical stakeholders, which may include medical staff, nursing staff, clinical audit staff and patients. The audit sample should include adults (aged 18 years and older) with metastatic colorectal cancer (suggested ICD-10 code C18 Malignant neoplasm of colon). Advice on how to decide on sample size is available on HQIP’s website. The audit standards are based on the NICE guidance: ‘Colorectal cancer: the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer’ ‘Bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer’ ‘Cetuximab for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer’ ‘Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and either fluorouracil plus folinic acid or capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer’ ‘Cetuximab (monotherapy or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (in combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy’. Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 4 of 13 A baseline assessment tool is available. This can help to compare practice with the guideline’s recommendations and prioritise implementation activity, including clinical audit. The audit based on this guideline should be considered in conjunction with other clinical audit priorities such as those listed in appendix A. The audit standards in this document include a reference to the guidance recommendation numbers, and any associated NICE quality standard statements and exceptions. Exceptions not explicitly referred to in the guideline can be added locally, for example, patients declining treatment. NICE recommends compliance of 100%. If this is not achievable an interim local target could be set, although 100% should remain the ultimate aim. A data collection form should be completed for each patient. There is a section for demographic information that can be completed if this information is essential to the project. Patient identifiable information should never be recorded. Following the audit the action plan template can be used to develop and implement an action plan to take forward any recommendations made. Re-audit is a key part of the clinical audit cycle, required to demonstrate that improvement has been achieved and sustained. Once a re-audit has been completed, the shared learning database can be used to share the experience of putting NICE guidance into practice. For further information about clinical audit refer to a local clinical audit professional in your own organisation or the HQIP website. To ask a question about this clinical audit tool, or to provide feedback to help inform the development of future tools, please email [email protected] Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 5 of 13 Standards for biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer clinical audit Audit standards Guidance reference Exceptions Definitions BEVACIZUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH OXALIPLATIN AND EITHER 5-FLUOROURACIL OR CAPECITABINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 1. People with metastatic colorectal cancer should not be prescribed bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and either fluorouracil plus folinic acid or capecitabine TA212 1.1 and 1.2 Data collection form, question 1 A – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 212 (December 2010) None None None CETUXIMAB FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 2. People with metastatic colorectal cancer should be offered cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, only when all of the following criteria are met: TA 176 1.1 • the primary colorectal tumour had been resected or was potentially operable • the metastatic disease was confined to the liver and was unresectable • the patient was fit enough to undergo surgery to resect the primary colorectal tumour and to undergo liver surgery if the metastases became resectable after treatment with cetuximab Data collection form, questions 2 to 6 Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 6 of 13 Audit standards Guidance reference 3. People with metastatic colorectal cancer should be offered cetuximab in combination with 5-FU, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer only when all of the following criteria are met: TA176 1.2 TA176 1.3 Exceptions Definitions None None None None • the primary colorectal tumour had been resected or was potentially operable • the metastatic disease was confined to the liver and was unresectable • the patient was fit enough to undergo surgery to resect the primary colorectal tumour and to undergo liver surgery if the metastases became resectable after treatment with cetuximab • the patient was unable to tolerate or had contraindications to oxaliplatin Data collection form, questions 7 to 12 4. People who meet criteria above (from guidance references TA176 1.1 and 1.2) should receive treatment with cetuximab for no more than 16 weeks. 5. At 16 weeks, treatment with cetuximab should stop and the patient should be assessed for resection of liver metastases Data collection form, questions 13 to 15 Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 7 of 13 BEVACIZUMAB AND CETUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 6. People with colorectal cancer should not be prescribed bevacizumab in combination with 5-FU plus folinic acid, with or without irinotecan for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer TA118 1.1 and 1.3 B – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal 118 (January 2007) None Data collection form, questions 16 and 17 CETUXIMAB (MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINATION THERAPY), BEVACIZUMAB (IN COMBINATION WITH NON-OXALIPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY) AND PANITUMUMAB (MONOTHERAPY) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER AFTER FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY 7. Cetuximab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy should not be prescribed for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy TA242 1.1 C – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 242 (January 2012) None TA242 1.2 C – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 242 (January 2012) None TA242 1.3 C – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 242 (January 2012) None Data collection form, questions 18 and 19 8. Bevacizumab in combination with non-oxaliplatin (fluoropyrimidine-based) chemotherapy should not be prescribed for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy Data collection form, questions 18 and 20 9. Panitumumab should not be prescribed for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed after first-line chemotherapy Data collection form, questions 18 and 21 Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 8 of 13 Data collection form for biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer clinical audit Audit ID: Sex: Age: The audit ID should be an anonymous code. Patient identifiable information should never be recorded. White British Irish Any other white background No Mixed White and black Caribbean White and black African White and Asian Asian or Asian British Indian Black or black British Caribbean Other Chinese Pakistani African Bangladeshi Any other black background Any other ethnic group Not stated Any other mixed background Any other Asian background Question Yes No Exception* /NA/Notes BEVACIZUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH OXALIPLATIN AND EITHER 5-FLUOROURACIL OR CAPECITABINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 1 Was the person prescribed bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and either fluorouracil plus folinic acid or capecitabine? A CETUXIMAB FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 2 Was the person with metastatic colorectal cancer offered cetuximab in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)? If no, go to question 7 3 Was this as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer? Were the following criteria met: 4 • the primary colorectal tumour had been resected or was potentially operable 5 • the metastatic disease was confined to the liver and was unresectable 6 • the patient was fit enough to undergo surgery to resect the primary colorectal tumour and to undergo liver surgery if the metastases became resectable after treatment with cetuximab Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 9 of 13 7 Was the person with metastatic colorectal cancer offered cetuximab in combination with 5-FU, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI)? If no, go to question 16 8 Was this as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer? Were the following criteria met: 9 • the primary colorectal tumour had been resected or was potentially operable 10 • the metastatic disease was confined to the liver and was unresectable 11 • the patient was fit enough to undergo surgery to resect the primary colorectal tumour and to undergo liver surgery if the metastases became resectable after treatment with cetuximab 12 • the patient was unable to tolerate or had contraindications to oxaliplatin 13- Did the person receive cetuximab for more than 16 weeks? 14- At 16 weeks did treatment with cetuximab stop? 15- Was the patient assessed for resection of liver metastases? BEVACIZUMAB AND CETUXIMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER 16 Was the person with colorectal cancer prescribed bevacizumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid, with or without irinotecan? 17 Was this for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer? Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 10 of 13 B CETUXIMAB (MONOTHERAPY OR COMBINATION THERAPY), BEVACIZUMAB (IN COMBINATION WITH NON-OXALIPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY) AND PANITUMUMAB (MONOTHERAPY) FOR THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER AFTER FIRST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY 18 Did the person have metastatic colorectal cancer which has progressed after first-line chemotherapy? 19 Was the person prescribed: • cetuximab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy? 20 • bevacizumab in combination with non-oxaliplatin (fluoropyrimidine-based) chemotherapy? 21 • panitumumab C *Circle exception codes as appropriate. Exception codes A – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 212 (December 2010). B – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal 118 (January 2007) C – people receiving the drug(s) before publication of NICE technology appraisal guidance 242 (January 2012) Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 11 of 13 Action plan for biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer clinical audit KEY (Change status) 1 Recommendation agreed but not yet actioned 2 Action in progress 3 Recommendation fully implemented 4 Recommendation never actioned (please state reasons) 5 Other (please provide supporting information) Action plan lead Name: Title: Contact: The ‘Actions required’ should specifically state what needs to be done to achieve the recommendation. All updates to the action plan should be included in the ‘Comments’ section. Recommendation Actions required (specify ‘None’, if none required) Action by date Person responsible Comments/action status (Provide examples of action in progress, changes in practices, problems encountered in facilitating change, reasons why recommendation has not been actioned etc) Change stage (see Key) When making improvements to practice, organisations may like to use the tools developed by NICE to help implement the guidance on: Colorectal cancer: the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer, Bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, Cetuximab for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and either fluorouracil plus folinic acid or capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, Cetuximab (monotherapy or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (in combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 12 of 13 Appendix A Other clinical audits that should be considered when planning an audit based on this tool. The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project NICE has also produced a number of other clinical audit tools based on clinical guidelines and technology appraisals for colorectal cancer, including: Colorectal cancer: diagnosis Colorectal cancer: staging of colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer management of local disease – colonic stents in acute bowel obstruction Colorectal cancer: management of local disease – preoperative management of the primary tumour Colorectal cancer: management of local disease – stage I colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer: management of metastatic disease Colorectal cancer: chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer: ongoing care and support Clinical audit tool: Biological agents for metastatic colorectal cancer (2012) Page 13 of 13