Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sequential Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma J C Nunes Marques Serviço de Oncologia Médica Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental Molecular Pathways and Targeted Therapies in Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Brugarolas J. N Engl J Med 2007;356:185-187. Angiogenesis: a target for anticancer therapy Rini. Clin Cancer Res 2007, 13 Faivre et al. Nat Ver Drug Disc 2007, 6 Homsi and Dand. Cancer control 2007, 14 Andrae et al. Genes Dev 2008, 22 Kerbel. N Engl J Med 2008, 358 Sonpavde et al. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2008, 17 Ma and Adjei. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59 Chronology and uses of available molecular-targeted agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the U.S. and Europe. Hutson T E The Oncologist 2011;16:14-22 Ongoing Phase III Trial: Pazopanib vs Sunitinib in the first-line treatment of patients with mRCC (COMPARZ) US National Institutes of Health Web Site http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00720941 acessed26oct2011 Potencial Biomarkers in mRCC Speculation of the best sequential therapy for mRCC PFS of patients receiving sequential therapy (months) Sunitinib2 11 Sorafenib14 4,5 Everolimus15 4 Bevacizumab+INF4 10,2 Sorafenib1 6 Sunitinib14 6,5 Everolimus15 4 27,1 Bevacizumab+INF4 10,2 Sunitinib12 7 Sorafenib14 4,5 Everolimus15 4 25,7 INF2 5 Axitinib10 15,7 Everolimus15 4 Bevacizumab+INF4 10,2 Sorafenib1 6 Axitinib13 7,4 1 Escudier et al. NEngJMed 2007; 356 2 Motzer et al. NEngJMed 2007; 356 4 Escudier et al. Lancet 2007; 370 10 Rixe et al. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8 12 Scharzberg et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 13 Rini BI et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26 14 Rini BI et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 15Sablin MP et al. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 Total PFS 19,5 24,7 Everolimus15 4 27,6 Escudier B, et al. Cancer 2009; 115 (10 Suppl): 2321-2326 Rational of sequential therapy • each targeted agent possesses a unique biologic profile • patients have benefited from subsequent therapy with a different antiangiogenic agent • full dose of each drug can be delivered without overlapping toxicities •additional PFS benefit can been achieved • the aim of therapy is to maximize the overall benefit to patient in terms of both quality and duration of life Sablin MP, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25 (18S): Abstract 5038 Dham A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(18S):Abstract 5106 Drabkin HÁ, et al. J Clin Oncol.2007;25(18S):Abstract 5041 Targeted agents in sequence Study* NCT00903175 (RECORD-3) Sequence NCT00732914 (SWITCH) Study type Randomized phase III Randomized phase III NCT00678392 (AXIS) Randomized phase III NCT00474786 (TORISEL 404) Randomized phase III NCT00678288 Randomized phase II After 1st line failure Treatment 1 Treatment 2 n Sunitinib Everolimus 390 vs everolimus sunitinib Sunitinib Sorafenib 540 vs sorafenib sunitinib 650 TT or CK Sorafenib vs axitinib 480 sunitinib Sorafenib vs temsirolimus Sorafenib vs 24 sunitinib Sorafenib+INF NCT00782275 Phase II TKI(one), CK or chemo Bevacizumab +temsirolimus 46 NCT00651482 Phase II TKI (one) CK Bevacizumab + everolimus 30 *available at http://clinicaltrials.gov Summary • The sequential approach with targeted agents have revealed clinical efficacy •Data suggests that there is only negligibile crossresistance between TKIs • In clinical studies of sequential therapy, everolimus was effective after treatment with one or two TKIs • In clinical studies of sequential therapy, sequential treatment was tolerable and toxicity was predictable