Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
REGULATING SINGAPORE’S ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY 11 April 2011 Outline •The Electricity Industry Milestones 1) Background 2) Restructuring of Singapore’s Electricity Industry 3) Regulatory Philosophy 4) Regulatory Framework 5) Regulatory Practices 6) Key Lessons 7) Results achieved so far About the Energy Market Authority of Singapore •The Electricity(EMA) Industry Milestones • The lead agency for energy matters in Singapore – a statutory board under the Ministry of Trade and Industry. • EMA is also the regulator of Singapore’s electricity and gas industries. • EMA’s main goals are to: (1) ensure a reliable and secure energy supply; (2) promote effective competition in the energy market; and (3) develop a dynamic energy sector in Singapore. Overview of Singapore’s Energy Landscape Gas from Indonesia • No significant energy resources – dependent on imports for energy needs. • About 80% of Singapore’s electricity is generated using imported natural gas – vulnerable to price fluctuations and supply disruptions • Singapore faces additional challenge of being alternative energy disadvantaged – limited scope to deploy solar and wind energy on a large scale. •The Electricity Industry Milestones Restructuring of Singapore’s Electricity Industry Electricity Industry of Reforms - 2000 Industry Restructuring the Electricity • Singapore’s electricity industry had traditionally been vertically integrated and Government-owned. • Liberalisation of electricity industry began in 1995, and continued through 2000, where the government decided to press on with further liberalisation of the electricity industry and obtain the full benefits of competition. Key Initiatives for Restructuring: • Clear separation of contestable/competitive businesses from natural monopolies to ensure level playing field • Open access to monopoly infrastructure ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY 1995 Electricity Industry STRUCTURE Structure in IN 1995 Singapore Power Senoko Power ENV Tuas Power SembCorp Cogen IPPs PowerSeraya PowerGrid Ltd T&D System Operations Power Supply Ltd Franchised Sector Nonfranchised Sector Franchised Consumers Utilities Support Services Pool Operations since Apr 98 Private Electricity Suppliers Utilities Support Services Progressive extension of competition Nonfranchised Sector Non-franchised Consumers Contestable Business Non-contestable Business ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY STRUCTURE IN Today APRIL 2001 Electricity Industry Structure Senoko Power Power Seraya Tuas Power NEA IPPs EMA Industry Regulator PowerGrid Singapore Power T&D SP Services (formerly Power Supply) Franchised (Small) Consumers System Operator Market to be fully opened ultimately Electricity Retailers Non-franchised (Large Industrial & Commercial) Consumers Energy Market Company Market Operator Electricity Flow Note: SP Services is not allowed to compete with the retailers for contestable consumers, it just passes through the pool price. Regulatory Philosophy Contestable Sector (Gencos, Retailers) Monopoly Sector (SP PowerAssets, SP Services, EMC) regulate with light touch regulate revenue/prices rely on market signals incentivise efficient behaviour ensure level playing field Set performance standards to prevent “cutting of corners” Low barriers to entry Transparent rules and consistent application of rules share cost savings with consumers Open access •The Electricity Industry Milestones Contestable Sector: Generation Wholesale WholesaleElectricity Electricity Market • Gencos bid half-hourly to sell electricity Market Mechanism • Energy • Reserve: Primary, Secondary and Contingency • Regulation • Retailers/contestable consumers buy electricity Market Operator • EMC • Perform market clearing and settlement functions Market Power Wholesale Market VestinginContracts • Wholesale Market is dominated by three large gencos, with combined market share of close to 80%. • Gencos can push prices up by witholding supply. Demand Price P2 Genco C P1 Genco B Genco A At demand = Q, Market Price is P1. However, suppose Genco A withholds supply, Genco C would now be dispatched. The market price would increase to P2. Genco B Genco A Quantity Q Vesting VestingContracts Contracts(1) Solution: • Introduced Vesting Contracts in 2004 - Gencos to sell a specified amount of electricity at specified price. Vesting Cover Vesting price 2004 Mid-2007 2011 2012 Ultimate Goal 65% 55% 60% 55% 0% LRMC of most economic power plant in Singapore • Vesting Price set by EMA based on Long Run Marginal Cost of the most economic generation technology in operation in Singapore and that contributes to more than 25% of total demand. Review of Vesting Price Review of Vesting Price • EMA reviews the LRMC parameters every 2 years and resets them to reflect the costs of newer and more efficient plants. • In each round of review, EMA consults the industry before deciding on the value of parameters that would take effect for the next 2-year period. • EMA is also required to consult all Vesting Contract holders (i.e. gencos) at least 3 months in advance of any amendments to the parameters of the vesting price, or the methodology for setting the vesting price. • Review process is transparent and gives regulatory certainty to gencos. •The Electricity Industry Milestones Regulatory Practices Key Points on Regulatory Practices •The Electricity Industry Milestones 1) Transparency • • • Publication of licencing requirements and procedures Advance publication of new or amended regulations and procedures Public consultation process 2) Application Procedures • • • • Non-discriminatory and consistent application of rules in the processing of applications for a licence Incomplete applications: inform applicant and process applications as much as possible in the meantime Target timeframe of processing: 12 weeks Rejection of applications: inform applicant, reasons provided •The Electricity Industry Milestones Key Lessons Key Lessons (1) •The Electricity Industry Milestones 1) Need for Consultative Approach • Increased transparency and increased trust. • Valuable source of ideas: better outputs and outcomes at a lower cost. • To get buy-in: greater acceptance and compliance with policies Best Practices: (a) Need to establish consistent guidelines and procedures on consultation. (b) Need to allow adequate time for consultation. (c) Need to provide adequate feedback. (d) “E-Consultation” to rapidly reach large numbers of people at low cost . Key Lessons (2) •The Electricity Industry Milestones 2) Need to Provide Regulatory Certainty • Given that energy projects typically are planned years in advance and require huge sums of money, investors need to be confident that rules would not be changed in the middle of the game. • Regulatory uncertainty results in increased regulatory risks, which would increase costs for companies, and deter investment (both local and foreign), thereby affecting security of supply. Best Practices: (a) Clear and transparent regulatory regime -> reduces regulatory discretion, and promotes accountability. (b) Consistency in regulatory decisions -> promotes predictability. Results achieved so far •The Electricity Industry Milestones • Competition has motivated gencos to switch from oil-fired steam plants to more cost efficient gas-fired plants. If not, electricity prices today would be about 15 per cent higher. • Liberalisation of the electricity market has also seen consumers benefit from greater choice of retailers, and pricing plans. Today, around 75% of demand have retail choice, and we are working on how to let the remaining 25% also enjoy the benefits of competition. • In the monopoly sector, regulation has also brought about lower rates, while maintaining the high performance of the grid . • The results thus far can be attributed to the effective regulatory framework and the close partnership between EMA and the industry. Nonethless, there is scope for further improvement and we are still learning! Moving forward, we recognise that as regulatory frameworks evolve, it is important that we continue to learn from international best practices. THANK YOU