Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Atypical IRVAN presentation Piergiorgio Neri, MB ChB, MD, PhD Head of Ocular Inflammation Unit Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Ocular History • 43 year old man • 5-2006: LE severe visual decrease • No systemic problems • Tests performed not contributory May 2006: First presentation • BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/400 • No cells in the anterior chamber, no cell in the vitreous • Fundus RE: normal • Funsus LE: – Retinal vasculitis – Multiple macroaneurysms – Neuroretinitis Treatment • Panretinal photocoagulation – IMPROVEMENT March 2007 • BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/200 • Mild visual disturbances • Fundus RE: central retinal vasculits with retinal ischemia • Fundus LE: stable after PRP Treatment • Oral prednisone (1mg/Kg/day) associated with mycophenolate mofetil (1g twice/day) – IMPROVEMENT June 2007 • BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/200 • No complaints • Fundus RE: microvascular abnormalities with no signs of retinal vasculitis •FA in the RE: retinal ischemia in the temporal side • Fundus LE: stable after PRP Treatment • Pattern Scan Laser (PASCALTM) Photocoagulation of ischemic areas – IMPROVEMENT Problems • Asynchronous occurrence • No guidelines for the therapy • Pathophysiology (is IRVAN secondary to a vasoocclusive vasculitis?) Conclusion • IRVAN is generally bilateral, even though the involvement of the eyes is not always synchronous • Systemic investigations are generally not contributory • It is possible that IRVAN can have a prodromic phase with ischemic retinal vasculitis • Systemic steroids and immunesuppression are generally not helpful, but this can be not true, if applied in the prodromic phase • Argon laser photocoagulation is mandatory for cases with retinal ischemia