Download Case Report 7.88

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Atypical IRVAN presentation
Piergiorgio Neri, MB ChB, MD, PhD
Head of Ocular Inflammation Unit
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona
Ocular History
• 43 year old man
• 5-2006: LE severe visual decrease
• No systemic problems
• Tests performed not contributory
May 2006: First presentation
• BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/400
• No cells in the anterior chamber, no cell in the
vitreous
• Fundus RE: normal
• Funsus LE:
– Retinal vasculitis
– Multiple macroaneurysms
– Neuroretinitis
Treatment
• Panretinal photocoagulation
– IMPROVEMENT
March 2007
• BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/200
• Mild visual disturbances
• Fundus RE: central retinal vasculits with retinal
ischemia
• Fundus LE: stable after PRP
Treatment
• Oral prednisone (1mg/Kg/day) associated with
mycophenolate mofetil (1g twice/day)
– IMPROVEMENT
June 2007
• BCVA: RE 20/20, LE 20/200
• No complaints
• Fundus RE: microvascular abnormalities with no
signs of retinal vasculitis
•FA in the RE: retinal ischemia in the temporal side
• Fundus LE: stable after PRP
Treatment
• Pattern Scan Laser (PASCALTM) Photocoagulation of
ischemic areas
– IMPROVEMENT
Problems
• Asynchronous occurrence
• No guidelines for the therapy
• Pathophysiology (is IRVAN secondary to a vasoocclusive vasculitis?)
Conclusion
• IRVAN is generally bilateral, even though the
involvement of the eyes is not always synchronous
• Systemic investigations are generally not
contributory
• It is possible that IRVAN can have a prodromic phase
with ischemic retinal vasculitis
• Systemic steroids and immunesuppression are
generally not helpful, but this can be not true, if
applied in the prodromic phase
• Argon laser photocoagulation is mandatory for cases
with retinal ischemia