Download National Income determination

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Fei–Ranis model of economic growth wikipedia , lookup

Consumerism wikipedia , lookup

Gross fixed capital formation wikipedia , lookup

Đổi Mới wikipedia , lookup

Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup

Rostow's stages of growth wikipedia , lookup

Keynesian economics wikipedia , lookup

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Keynesian
Income Determination
Overview
 Keynesian Income Determination Models
 Private sector



Consumption demand
Investment Demand
Supply & demand for money
 Public



Sector
Government expenditure
Government taxes
Monetary policy manipulation of money supply
 International

imports, exports, net exports
Private Sector
 Simple model
 Consumption
& Aggregate Demand
 Savings & Investment
 Consumption is consumption of "household"
 Savings
 in
C&F, savings = savings of consumers out of unspent
income
 but most savings = retained business profits
 Investment: by business thru profits & borrowed $
Consumption function = C = f(Y)
[=c(y)in C&F]
 where Y =
income
 and dC/dY > 0, i.e., C rises as Y rises
C = f(Y)
Consumption
Household income
Consumption function = C = f(Y)
[=c(y)in C&F]
 where Y =
income
 and dC/dY > 0, i.e., C rises as Y rises
C = f(Y)
Consumption
?
Household income
Linear Version
 We will only deal with linear versions of the
consumption function because it makes things
simpler
C = a + bY
Consumption
dC/dY = b
C
Y
Aggregate Income = Y
Manipulate
 Suppose the marginal propensity to consume rises. What
happens to the function? Under what circumstances would
"a" rise? Or fall?
C = a + bY
Consumption
dC/dY = b
C
Y
Aggregate Income = Y
Change in MPC
 Rise in MPC, b' > b would steepen curve
Consumption
C = a + b' Y
dC/dY = b
C = a + bY
Aggregate Income = Y
Change in "a"
 Under what circumstances would "a" rise? Or fall? Rise:
a' > a, fall: a' < a
C = a' + bY
Consumption
C = a + bY
Aggregate Income = Y
Savings Function - derivation
 Savings function = flip side of consumption
function, what you don't spend you save
 C = a +bY
Y=C+S
 Y = a + bY + S
 Y - a - bY = S
 -a + (1 - b)Y = S
 S = -a + (1-b)Y
45o Line
 To facilitate derivation, and future work
Savings Function - derivation
graphical
C = a + bY
Consumption
a
Savings
S = -a + (1-b)Y
-a
Investment - I
 Investment = "real" investment, i.e., the
expenditure of money to buy and employ labor
and raw materials and machines to produce
commodities, i.e., M - C(MP,L) ... P... C'
 Buying, employing and accumulating "capital
stock"
 machines
(MP)
 inventories of raw materials (MP)
 inventories of produced goods (C')
Investment - II
  "Planned" investment
 Planned
purchases of inputs & inventory accumulation
  "Actual" investment
 Actual
purchase & accumulation
 Actual can be different than Planned I
 difference
is usually unexpected changes in inventories
 if actual > planned, firms have excess inventory
 if actual < planned, firms have less inventory
Investment - III
 We can make various assumptions about
determinants of Investment
I
= f(), investment a function of profits,dI/dp >0
 I = f(Y), investment a function of level of economic
activity,dI/dY >0
 I = f(Yt - Yt-1), investment a function of growth
 I = I, investment assumed fixed for short run

This last is C&F assumption, easiest to start with
Fixed Investment
 To assume I is fixed, or given, at all levels of Y
means we have an investment function like this:
I
I=I
Y
"Equilibrium Level of Y"
 "Equilibrium" means same as with supply &
demand
 any
move away will set forces in motion that will return
you to equilibrium
 Given expenditures C and I, the equilibrium level
of Y will = C + , or total aggregate demand.
 Given investment I and savings S, the equilibrium
level of Y will be given by S = I
YC+I
 Equilibrium when planned expenditures = actual
expenditures, no unexpected accumulation or disaccumulation of inventories.
C, I
C+I = a + bY + I
C = a + bY
I=I
Y
Y
YC+I
 Suppose output greater than expected (A) or less than
expected (B).
C, I
C+I = a + bY + I
Unplanned
fall in
inventories
excess
inventories
B
Y
A
Y
SI
 Equilibrium also requires that
planned I = planned S
S = -a + bY
I=I
Ye
SI?
 If planned I  planned S, then the same
mechanism of firms responding to unexpected
changes in inventory will return Y to Ye
S, I
S = -a + (1-b)Y
Unplanned
fall in
inventories
excess
inventory
I=I
Ye
Y
I = f + gY
 Let I = f(Y) and let f(Y) be linear,
 e.g.,
I = f + gY
 where f > 0, g > 0
S, I
S = -a +(1-b)Y
I = f + gY
Y
Algebraic Solutions
Y=C+I
 where
C = a + bY
 where I = I, or I = f + gY
 Solve for equilibrium Y
S=I
 where
S = -a + (1-b)Y
 where I = I, or I = f + gY
 Solve for equilibrium Y
Problems
 Most of problems in C&F ask you to solve for
equilibrium Y given values of variables
 You can also experiment to see what will happen
when various kinds of events occur in the private
sector
 e.g.,
business goes on strike, cuts back on I
 e.g., a burst of optimism (or demoralization) raises (or
lowers) b or a such that the consumption function shifts
 Take real numbers and calculate parameters
Multiplier - I
 Contemplation of the previous phenomena, using
these tools, especially with numerical examples
will lead you to notice that changes in a or I will
produce larger changes in Y, the effects will be
"multiplied"
Is this magic?
No! Multiplier - II
 Assume I increases, clearly
>
but, by how much?
S
I'
I
Multiplier - III
Y=C+I
 C = a + bY
I=I
 Y = a + bY + I, so now substract bY from ea. side
 Y - bY = a + I, regrouping
 (1 - b)Y = a + I, divide both sides by (1-b)
 Y = a/(1-b) + I/(1-b), take derivative
 dY/dI = 1/(1-b), so if b = .75, then dY/dI = 4
Multiplier - IV
S=I
 S = -a + (1-b)Y
I=I
 You solve for dY/dI
 You solve for dY/da
Why?
 Keynes developed this conceptual approach to
looking at the whole economy because he didn't
like the kinds of results generated by the private
sector and wanted tools that could help figure out
how to intervene
 For example, in Great Depression, faced with
stock market crash and industrial unions, business
cut way back on investment, results could be
analyzed with these tools.
Great Depression
 Business strike = I
C+I
C + I'
I' < I
1932
1929
So What to Do?
 Partly answer will come from widening analysis to
include government
 Partly answer will come from widening analysis to
include financial sector
 Both will provide tools to help government decide
how to intervene to restore the earlier (and higher)
levels of national output
--END--