Download What is evolution?

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
What is evolution?
Evolution is change in the gene pool of a population over time
Gene: hereditary unit passed on unaltered for many generations
Gene pool: set of all genes in a species or population
Population: a group of individuals of one species living in a particular
geographic area
I will illustrate what is evolution using data of Peter Grant and Rosemary
Grant, two scientists from Princeton University who have been studying
finches in the Galapagos Islands for about 30 years.
Rosemary
Grant
Peter
Grant
Several of the main traits that the Grants have studied are beak size and
shape. Beaks are important tools for the birds and the size and shape
of the beak affects what seeds they eat and how well they handle them.
This picture is from Darwin’s book, The Voyage of the Beagle
The main species that the Grants have studied on Daphne Major
is the medium ground finch (Geospiza fortis)
This graph is a histogram of beak depth in 751 individual medium
ground finches on Daphne Major in 1976. The arrow points to
the average value.
# of individuals
80
60
40
20
0
6
7
8
9
10
Beak depth (mm)
11
12
13
14
The average beak depth increased after a drastic drought hit the population
80
1976. Before
the drought.
60
# of birds
40
20
0
12
6
8
10
12
10
1978. The
survivors.
8
# of birds
14
6
4
2
0
6
8
10
Beak depth (mm)
12
14
Does this imply evolution has occurred?
Which information is further needed in the case study just presented in
order to suggest evolution has happened?
Before drought
But if so, no evolution would
have occurred—and the next
generation might have had the
same mean beak depth as the
original population.
# of birds
Finches with large beaks
could have been favored even
if all the variation in the original
population had been
environmental (none of
it due to genes).
# of birds
80
60
40
20
0
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
6
8
10
12
14
After drought
6
8
10
12
14
Beak depth (mm)
80
Next generation
60
40
20
0
6
8
10
12
14
How do we know change in beak depth is due to change in the
gene pool?
In other words how do we know the variation in beak depth is mainly
due to genetic variation rather than environmental variation?
Before drought
# of birds
Evolution occurs only if the
heritability of the trait is
greater than zero—that is,
some of the variation in the
original population is due to
variation in the genes.
# of birds
80
60
40
20
0
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
6
8
10
12
14
After drought
6
8
10
12
14
If so, then the average
beak depth of the next
generation will shift in the
direction of the remaining
population after the drought
# of birds
Beak depth (mm)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Next generation
6
8
10
12
14
What actually happened?
1976. Before the drought
Mean beak depth (mm)
9.4
1978. After the drought
10.1
1978. Next generation
9.7
Æ Beak depth has evolved
Probable cause of evolution on beak depth: changes during
the drought in seed size and hardness. As a result more birds with
larger beak depths survived until reproductive age and left offspring
Large,
hard seeds
6.5
5.5
Seed index
4.5
Small,
soft seeds
3.5
Jul-75
1975
Feb-76
Aug-76
1976
Mar-77
Oct-77
1977
Apr-78
1978
Nov-78
Hence evolution by natural selection occurred in the G. fortis population
Natural selection: differential reproductive success of pre-existing classes
of genetic variants in the gene pool; only mechanism of adaptive evolution
Which unit evolves: the individual or the population?
Which unit evolves: the individual or the population?
The population
View populations as a collection of individuals, each individual harboring a
different set of traits. Individuals do not evolve, they die out of the population
taking with them their specific genes
In our Geospiza fortis example:
80
1976. Before
the drought.
60
# of birds
40
20
0
12
6
8
10
12
10
1978. The
survivors.
8
# of birds
14
6
4
2
0
6
8
10
Beak depth (mm)
12
14
Microevolution: evolution occurring at the level of populations. Think of it
as vertical change in the same species
Macroevolution: evolution involving larger changes, such as when
a new species is formed. This involves vertical change plus branching:
new species
Common misconceptions about evolution
- Evolution can occur without morphological change –e.g. behavioral
change– and morphological change can occur without evolution –
phenotypic changes due to changes in environment
Phenotype: morphological, physiological, biochemical, behavioral and
other properties exhibited by a living organism
-Evolution is not progress. Populations simply adapt to their current
surroundings. They do not necessarily become better in any absolute
sense over time.
-Organisms are not passive targets of their environment. Each species
modifies its own environment
Genetic variation
Evolution requires genetic variation. Mutations –random changes in a
gene – and sexual recombination – shuffling of alleles during meiosis-create variation in the gene pool of a population.
Mutations are the ultimate generators of genetic diversity as they originate
new alleles
Genetic variation has two components: allelic diversity and non-random
associations of alleles
-Alleles are different versions of the same gene
-Locus is the location of a gene in a chromosome
-Diploid individuals with two alleles at every locus
-Homozygous: individuals whose two alleles are the same type
-Heterozygous: individuals whose two alleles are different
At any locus there can be many different alleles in a population. Example:
Blood group in humans: A, B, O
Non random associations of alleles can be the result of:
Linkage disequilibrium – association between alleles at different loci –
For example in the moth Papilio memnon there is an association
between the gene that determines wing morphology and the one that
determines wing color
Assortative mating –non random mating that causes a shift in the
distribution of alleles at a single locus
For example humans mate assortatively according to race; in populations
that mate this way, fewer heterozygous are found that would be predicted
under random mating
Related documents