Download Programming Break-Out

YOUR FACILITATORS:
Kellie Dunn-Poggemann, WISHRM Secretary
& State Director Elect
Helen Englebert, WISHRM State Leadership
Director
Linda Johanek, President-Elect , Green Bay
SHRM Chapter
2
AGENDA:
 State Speaker Database
– Kellie
 Program Assessment
Model – Helen
 Programming Survey
Review – Linda
 Next Steps - All
3
NEW PROGRAMMING RESOURCE
 Resource for ideas, speaker names, and companies
that do presentations
 Created from prior year State Conference RFP’s
 Not secured by an access code
 Located on the Chapter page of
www.wishrm.org under Other Resources
 http://www.wishrm.org/Chapters/Presentors.aspx
4
DATABASE RESOURCE
Information: as submitted for previous
year state conference (i.e. Kalahari
2009)
Each January 1 – next conference
proposals will upload
Previous year data will be erased when
the new data uploads
5
DATABASE RESOURCE
Chapters responsible to make the contact and
ask questions
 Will they speak at your chapter ?
 Speaker costs?
 Travel Costs or other charges, etc.?
Chapters will need to do their own references
Council is not endorsing any one speaker
6
DATABASE RESOURCE
•
Chapters are
unable to add
speakers
•
Council may add
council members
willing to speak
•
Unable to edit any
information
•
If you encounter
concerns with
using this as a
resource please
let the council
know
7
PROGRAMMING NEEDS
ASSESSMENT
An ongoing process of
discovering what your
program’s participants want
in terms of activities and
services.
8
EIGHT STEP ASSESSMENT MODEL:
1. Brainstorm Ideas
2. Research
3. Conduct Focus Group
4. Model
5. Survey
6. Try it!
7. Decide
8. Evaluate
9
USE OF FOCUS GROUPS
 Main Functions:
Brainstorm ideas
Choose options
 Participants
should be
members or
potential
members
 Invite people who
have ideas,
support and
enthusiasm
 Limit role of focus
group
 Keep time
involved to 1-2
hours
10
GBSHRM SENIOR LEVEL
HR FOCUS GROUP
Selection of Participants
Invitation/RSVP Process
Sample Agenda & Questions
Key Findings
Next Steps
11
PROGRAMMING SURVEY:
 15 Chapters
participated
(Response Rate =
83%)
 See Handouts for
specific results
 Result of recent
Programming CLA
 Difficulty in
finding
programming
contact for each
chapter
 Future Item –
develop contact
list for
programming
contacts and post
on website
12
PROGRAMMING SURVEY : TOP CONCERNS







60%: Securing Quality
Speakers
60%: Attracting Senior
Level Professionals
60%: Obtaining Strategic
Credits
46.7%: Securing
Affordable Speakers
40%: Member
Engagement
33.3%: Poor Attendance
33.3%: Lack of Time to
Network & Socialize







26.7%: Other
20%: Sharing of Workload
Amongst Programming
Committee
20%: Meeting Pricing
20%: Cost Control
13.3%: Venue Issues
13.3%: Meeting
Locations
6.7%: Meeting Times
13
PROGRAMMING SURVEY:
SIZE, TIMES & CHARGES
 Chapter Size
•
•
•
26.7% Small
53.3% Medium
20.0% Large
 Meeting Times:
•
•
•
•
33.3% Breakfast
26.7% Rotation of
breakfast, lunch & dinner
20% Lunch
20% Rotation of breakfast
and lunch
 Reg Meeting Charges:
•
•
•
•
•
•
33.3%: $11 - $15
26.7%: $16 - $20
20%: Other (varies)
13.3%: Free
6.7%: $26 - $30
6.7%: $31 – 35
 Financially:
•
•
•
•
•
40%: Break Even
33.3%: Combo
26.7%: Other
20%: Make Money
6.7%: Loose Money
14
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: PROGRAMMING
RESPONSIBILITY, TERMS & USE OF COMMITTEE
 Programming
 Term Limits
•
40% One Year
Responsibility
•
•
•
•
•
•
46.7% Prog Chair
26.7% VP
26.7% Entire Board
26.7% Other
13.3% President
13.3% Pres Elect
•
•
•
40% Two Years
13.3% Other
6.7% Three Years
80% use committee
for programming;
20% do not
15
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: WORKSHOPS
 Number Held
•
•
•
•
40%: One
26.7%: Two
26.7%: None
6.7%: More than Three
 Duration:
•
•
•
•
•
40%: Half-Day
26.7%: N/A
20%: Full-Day
20%: Other
13.3%: Combo of Half &
Full-Day
 Member Charge:
•
•
•
•
•
•
26.7%: N/A
20%: Depends
20%: $41 - $60
13.3%: $61 - $80
13.3%: $21 - $40
6.7%: $1 - $20
 Financially:
•
•
•
•
•
26.7%:
26.7%:
20.0%:
13.3%:
13.3%:
Break Even
Make Money
Other
Loose Money
Combo
16
PROGRAMMING SURVEY:
SETTING FEES
How do you determine fees
for each meeting?
 53.3%: Keep same fee, regardless of costs
 26.7%: Calculate fee based on costs
 26.7%: Other
17
PROGRAMMING SURVEY:
MEETING ATTENDANCE
For 2010 to date compared to previous years, how would
you characterize regular meeting attendance?
 46.7% About the same
 20% Increased
 20% Decreased
 13.3% Other
18
PROGRAMMING SURVEY : HRCI
 % of Meetings
Receiving HRCI
Credits (Gen or
Strategic)
•
•
•
•
•
66.7%: 91% - 100%
13.3%: 31% - 40%
6.7%: 51% - 60%
6.7%: 71% - 80%
6.7%: 81% - 90%
 % of Meetings
Receiving Strategic
HRCI Credits
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
33.3%: 11% - 20%
26.7%: 0 – 10%
13.3%: 31% - 40%
6.7%: 21% - 30%
6.7%: 41% - 50%
6.7%: 91% - 100%
6.7%: N/A
19
PROGRAMMING SURVEY: ITEMS TO REVIEW
 Senior level HR
programs
 Social events
 Best practices
 How programming
workload divided
 RFP’s & Contracts
 Online registrations
 Program marketing
 Top programs from
each chapter
 Transitional
member discounts
 Sponsorships
 Finding speakers
 Speaker fees
 Credit card
payments
20
NEXT STEPS:





Statewide CLA Calls
How often and when?
Who will facilitate?
Format?
Topics?
Guest Speakers?
Use each other as resources?
Share chapter meeting marketing materials.
National SHRM?
Email survey results to Chapter Presidents, President-Elects &
Programming Contacts.
21
22