Download Controversies in Glaucoma

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup

Patient safety wikipedia , lookup

Dysprosody wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Controversies in Glaucoma
Anthony B. Litwak, OD, FAAO
VA Medical Center
Baltimore,Maryland
Glaucoma is an Enigmatic Disease
 Risk
factors may or may not be present
 Who do we treat, who do we observe?
 Early glaucoma diagnosis can be difficult
 Determining progression can be arduous
 Some patients gets worse, some don’t
 No two glaucoma patients are exactly the same
Is One Ever Enough?
The IOP in Glaucoma Fluctuates More Than You
Think
 Diurnal
Changes More Common in Glaucoma (Greater than 6 mm Hg)
 IOP Fluctuation is Not Simply Based on Diurnal Variation
 IOP Can Vary From Day to Day
 You Can Never Rule Out an IOP Spike
Get Three Baseline IOP Readings Before Starting
Glaucoma Treatment
Helps Uncover Diurnal Fluctuation
 Mix Two Morning Readings With One Afternoon
 Imperative for Setting Target Pressures
 Emphasize the Highest Reading when Setting the Target Pressure
 Allows for Determining the Effectiveness of Medications
 Consider Diurnal Curve for NTG Patients

Baltimore Eye Survey
Over 5000 individuals received complete eye exams in a community in east
Baltimore
 Glaucoma was diagnosed based on the appearance of the optic nerve and visual
fields
 The initial IOP was < 22 mmHG in 55% of newly diagnosed, untreated glaucoma
patients
 If you took two IOP readings, 24% had both readings < 22 mm HG
 If you took multiple IOP readings, 16% had all IOP readings < 22 mm HG

Diurnal IOP Range and Disease Progression
CCT – IOP fix or Something More?
CCT and Ocular Hypertension
What trumps a risk factor for glaucoma?
Show Me The Nerve!!!
 Glaucoma
is a disease of the optic nerve, specifically the ganglion cell
axon
 Elevated IOP, AA race, + family history, older age, thinner CCT
increase the RISK of developing glaucoma
 Visual field loss is the end result
 Glaucoma is damage to the optic nerve
Compare Neuro-Retinal Rim Tissue Between Superior and Inferior
Does Size Really Matter?
 Is
there a C/D ratio that defines glaucoma?
Do You Think This Nerve Has Glaucoma?
A Big Cup Does Not Necessarily Mean Glaucoma





There is No Demarcation Line Separating a Physiological Cup From a Glaucomatous Cup
Physiological Cup Size Is Directly Related to Overall Disc Size
Large Discs Will Have Large Physiologic Cups
Small Discs Will Have Small Physiologic Cups
Physiologic Disc and Cup Size Is Genetically Determined


Physiologic Cup of .7 Or Greater Occurs in 2% of Normals
A Small Disc With a Medium Size Cup Should Be As Suspicious As a Large Cup in a Medium
Size Disc
How to Evaluate Disc Size
 Use
a 60 D Lens at the Slit Lamp
 Make a Thin Vertical Beam
 Adjust Beam Height
 Read Disc Diameter off Scale on Slit Lamp
 Vertical Disc Diameter > 2.2 mm Is a Large Disc
 Vertical Disc Diameter < 1.8 mm Is a Small Disc
Expected Physiologic Cup Size
Based on Measured Vertical Disc Diameter
Using a 60 Diopter Lens At The Slit Lamp
Can you have a normal VF and still have glaucoma?
Patterns of Diffuse NFL Loss
Focal NFL Defects
Interpreting VF’s – Back to Basics
 Does
elevated IOP and an abnormal VF always equal glaucoma?
Don’t Always Believe the Visual Field
A Significant Number of Patients are Poor Visual Field Testers
 Poor Reliability - Look at Reliability Indicators, But Don’t Always Believe Them
 Learning Curves - Repeat the Visual Field When the Field Does Not Match the
Optic Nerve
 Always Correlate the Visual Field with the Optic Nerve

How much attention should we pay to reliability indexes?
Is Blue Yellow Ready for Prime Time?
SITATM SWAP for the HFA
SITA SWAP Technology
The SITA SWAP Printout
Glaucoma Drugs – Who’s on First?
Prostaglandin Agonists
 Xalatan
 Travatan
 Lumigan
XLT Study
Hyperemia Grading Scale
Mean Hyperemia Score
When Should We Use Prostaglandins?
1st Line POAG
 Pseudophakia with Glaucoma
 Uveitic Glaucoma
 Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma
 Chronic Narrow Angle Closure Glaucoma
 Pigmentary Glaucoma
 Pseudo-exfoliative Glaucoma
 Neovascular Glaucoma
 Traumatic/Angle Recession Glaucoma
 Normal Tension Glaucoma

Beta Blockers
Bad Drugs or Bad Rap?
Beta-Blockers
 Most
Cost Effective Glaucoma Medication
 Tolerated Very Well By The Majority of Patients
 Well Studied and Long Track Record (1979)
 Screen
Patients for Potential Contraindications
Uniocular Trials
Standard of Care or Substandard?
 Cross
over effect of adrenergic agents
 Assumes that diurnal variation is constant between the two eyes
 Compare a series of IOP readings pre-medication and a series
post-medication
 Make sure you have established the baseline diurnal variation
Judging Progression
Which Way is Best?
Tailor the Treatment to the Individual Patient
The Most Difficult Aspect of Glaucoma Management is Determining
Progression






Compare Serial Optic Nerve/NFL Photographs
Compare Serial GDx, OCT, HRT
Compare Serial Visual Fields
55% Progressed by Disc Photos and 35% Progressed by VF’s in OHTS Study
89% Progressed on VFs and 11% Progressed by Optic Nerve Phototgraphs in NTG Study
It is Difficult to Differentiate Long Term Fluctuation (can vary by 10db or greater) in the Visual
Field From Glaucoma Progression
Which Patients Should We Worry About?









Patient who presents with severe damage, based on optic nerve, NFL and VF
Patient who is young
Patient who is African American
Patient who is an IOP spiker
Patient with a thinner cornea
Patient with family member (sibling) blind from glaucoma
Patient blind in one eye from glaucoma
Patient who is non-compliant
Patient who shows progression of glaucoma despite glaucoma treatment
AGIS 7
Sustained IOP below 18 mm Hg:
Positive Correlation with Stability of Visual Field
HRT: Progression Analysis Overview
Variability Issues with
Standard Perimetry
GPA Overview
GPA Single Field Analysis Printout
Lasers Wars – ALT vs SLT?
ALT
 ALT
(argon laser trabeculoplasty) was initially utilized in patients who
failed medical therapy
 The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) established efficacy of ALT in
lowering IOP as 1st line treatment in newly diagnosed primary
open-angle glaucoma patients
 ALT should not be repeated to the same area of trabecular meshwork
(thermal damage)
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
Uses Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser
 532 Nm Wavelength
 Short Pulse Duration (3 Nanoseconds)
 400 um Spot Size
 50 Spots Over 180 Degrees Of Tm 0.6-1.2 MJ

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty

Selectively Targets Pigmented Trabecular Cells Without Thermal Damage To
Adjacent Cells (Biological Effect)
 Less
“traumatic” than ALT
 May be able to repeat treatment with SLT
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
Clinical Results






Mean IOP Reduction 6 mm Hg (25% Reduction) from pre-treatment baseline of 24 mm Hg
24% Showed Post-op IOP Spike Of 5 mm Hg Or Greater
International studies show IOP reductions of 22%-28% with 36-49 weeks follow-up
In a prospective, randomized clinical trial, SLT and ALT were shown to have a similar effect on
IOP reduction
70% of patients [uncontrolled OAG on Max. Rx and prior failed laser trabeculoplasty (PFLT)]
respond with > 3 mm Hg drop in IOP
How often can you repeat SLT?
Who Are Good SLT Candidates?






Patients with poor compliance; good for flattening diurnal curve
Can be considered first line treatment in POAG
SLT targets pigmented cells- probably works better in patients with more pigment in TM
Works well in pigmentary and pseudoexfoliation
Patients with very heavy pigmentation have difficulty - absorption is so good that you have to
turn power down due to discomfort
Can use after successful ALT and may avoid the need for filtering surgery
Who are Poor SLT Candidates?
Inflammatory or uveitic glaucoma
 Congenital glaucoma/ICE syndromes/NVG and angle recession
 Narrow angle glaucoma or patients in whom it is difficult to visualize TM



400 um spot size – this is large spot size; so need good/deep angle to fit this spot size
Might try pilo prior to tx to see if can visualize more of angle
When Do We Filter?
 Filtering
surgery has significantly greater potential complications than
medications and laser
 I rarely recommend filtering surgery to achieve an initial target pressure
 Risk/Benefit Ratio
 Patient shows documented progression despite maximal tolerated
medical and laser therapy
What are the benefits of filtering surgery
 Achieve
low target pressures
 Control IOP spikes
 Less
reliance on patient’s taking their medications
What are the drawbacks of filtering surgery
 In
skilled surgeon hands, it is still only 80% successful
 IOP is often higher in a failed filter than before the surgery
 Accelerate cataract formation
 More local foreign body sensation
 Risk of catastrophic complications
Normal Tension Glaucoma
Does It Really Exist?
NTG Clinical Pearls









Common form of glaucoma (10-20%)
Diagnosed by careful inspection of the optic nerve and NFL and screening VFs (FDT)
Be sure to establish baseline IOP (Diurnal helpful)
Check Pachymetry
Similar in characteristics to POAG with some slight modifications
IOP lowering is beneficial in patients with NTG
Avoid non-selective beta blockers
Use Prostaglandins, alpha agonists, topical CAI’s, ALT and filtering surgery to achieve a 30% reduction
NTG is Not A Diagnosis of Exclusion
When do you do additional testing to R/O other etiologies?





Evidence of disc pallor
Visual field loss respects the vertical midline
Greater temporal than nasal visual field loss
Visual field loss out of proportion to optic nerve damage
 Be sure to rule out unreliable visual field tester
Over 95% of NTG do not require a neurological massage
Should We Abolish the Term
“Normal Tension Glaucoma”?





We Do Not Fully Understand the Pathophysiology of NTG or High Tension Glaucoma
Overlap in Risk Factors, Optic Nerve, NFL and Visual Field Appearance
50% of Glaucoma Patients Will Exhibit an IOP Reading <21 mm Hg
Patients may have thinner CCT and have false low IOP readings
Basically Treat Patients Similarly Whether They Have NTG or High Tension Glaucoma
COMPLIANCE
Never Assume That Your Patient is Compliant
 Reasons
For Poor Compliance
 Poor
Patient Education
 Inconvenience of Instilling Eyedrops
 Hectic Lifestyle
 Side Effects of Medications
 Cost of Medications
Develop a Doctor-Patient Bond
Starts From Day One
 Educate Patients About Their Disease
 Explain Benefits and Side Effects of Medications and Therapy
 Explain Other Glaucoma Treatment Options
 Use Dosing Schedule Sheets with Pictures of the Meds
 Emphasize the Positive
 Don’t Ignore the Negative
 Develop the Patient’s Trust
