Download From: Date: November 20, 2005 2:21

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
From: [email protected]
Date: November 20, 2005 2:21:58 PM PST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Web of Science
Notes: Web of
Science
F
ISI Export Format
N
V
1.0
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Martinez, D
Detailed and abstract phase-locked attractor network models of early olfac
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
Across species, primary olfactory centers show similarities both in their ce
types of olfactory information coding. In this article, we consider an excitat
network as a model of early olfactory systems (antennal lobe for insects, olf
In line with experimental results, we show that, in our network, odor-like
of excitatory cells, phase-locked to the oscillations of the local field p
mathematical analysis, the phase-locking probability of excitatory cells is g
and the firing probability of inhibitory cells is well described by a sigmoid f
functions are used to reduce the spiking model to a more abstract model wi
(oscillatory cycles) and binary-state neurons (phase-locked or not). An itera
the dynamics of the binary model, reveals that it converges to fixed point
obtained with the spiking model. This result is consistent with odor-specif
experimental studies. It also provides insights for designing bio-inspired o
applicable for data analysis in electronic noses.
C BAZHENOV M, 2001, NEURON, V30, P553
R BORGERS C, 2003, NEURAL COMPUT, V15, P509
BUONVISO N, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V17, P1811
CHOW CC, 1998, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V5, P407
CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P1
DAVISON AP, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P1921
EECKMAN FH, 1991, BRAIN RES, V557, P13
ERMENTROUT B, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P979
FRIEDRICH RW, 2001, SCIENCE, V291, P889
FRIEDRICH RW, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P862
GALAN RF, 2004, NEURAL COMPUT, V16, P999
GERSTNER W, 2002, SPIKING NEURON MODEL
GRAHAM B, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P337
HENDIN O, 1997, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V4, P173
HIRASE H, 1996, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V7, P741
HOLUB A, 2002, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V15
HOPPENSTEAD F, 2002, CANONICAL NEURAL MOD
HORN D, 1989, PHYS REV A, V40, P1036
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P31
HOSLER JS, 2000, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V114, P514
KASHIWADANI H, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V82, P1786
LAGIER S, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P4382
LAURENT G, 1994, SCIENCE, V265, P1872
LAURENT G, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P3837
LAURENT G, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P489
LAURENT G, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P723
LAURENT G, 2001, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V24, P263
LI Z, 1989, BIOL CYBERN, V61, P379
LI ZP, 2000, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V11, P83
LINSTER C, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P94
MARGRIE TW, 2003, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V546, P363
MARTINEZ D, 2005, IN PRESS NEURAL COMP
NG M, 2002, NEURON, V36, P463
NUSSER Z, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V86, P2823
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PEREZORIVE J, 2002, SCIENCE, V297, P359
QUENET B, 2003, NEURAL COMPUT, V15, P309
RAMAN B, 2004, CHEMOSENSORY PROCESS, P13
RAVEL N, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V17, P350
RUBIN J, 2004, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V15, P133
SACHSE S, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V18, P2119
SCHEIN A, 2003, P 9 INT WORKSH ART I, P14
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STOPFER M, 1997, NATURE, V390, P70
STOPFER M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P664
STOPFER M, 2003, NEURON, V39, P991
STRAUSFELD NJ, 1999, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V9, P634
WEHR M, 1996, NATURE, V384, P162
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
49
NOV
2005
93
5
S
B
355
P
E
365
P
U
ISI:000233042100004
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
S
Kryzhanovsky, B
Magomedov, B
Application of domain neural network to optimization tasks
ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: FORMAL MODELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS - ICANN 2
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
A new model of neural network (the domain model) is proposed. In this model t
into more large groups (domains), and accordingly the updating rule is modi
capacity grows linearly as function of the domain size. In optimization task
allows one to find more deep local minima of the energy than the standard
C ABUMOSTAFA YS, 1985, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V31, P461
R AMIT DJ, 1987, ANN PHYS-NEW YORK, V173, P30
COHEN MA, 1983, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V13, P815
GROSSBERG S, 1987, ADAPPTIVE BRAIN, V1
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KINZEL W, 1985, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V60, P205
KRYZHANOVSKII BV, 2003, DOKL MATH, V67, P455
KRYZHANOVSKII BV, 2005, DOKL MATH, V71, P310
PALM G, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P177
N
10
R
P
2005
Y
V
3697
L
B
397
P
E
403
P
U
ISI:000232196000063
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Bair, W
Visual receptive field organization
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Increasingly systematic approaches to quantifying receptive fields in primar
inspired ideas about functional circuitry, non-linearities, and visual stimu
to classical problems. This includes the distinction and hierarchy between
mechanisms underlying the receptive field surround, and debates about optimal
fields. An important new problem arises from recent observations of stimulussummation in primary visual cortex. It appears that the receptive field can n
and we might have to relinquish this cherished notion as the embodiment of
visual cortex.
C ALBRECHT DG, 2003, VISUAL NEUROSCIENCES, P747
R ALBRIGHT TD, ANN REV NEUROSCI, V25, P339
ANGELUCCI A, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P8633
ANGELUCCI A, 2003, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V97, P141
BAIR W, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P7690
BAIR W, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P7305
BROWN HA, 2003, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V20, P85
CARANDINI M, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P470
CARDIN JA, 2005, J NEUROSCI, V25, P5339
CAVANAUGH JR, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V88, P2530
DAVID SV, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P6991
GILBERT CD, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P615
GUO K, 2005, EUR J NEUROSCI, V21, P536
HIRSCH JA, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1800
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
IBBOTSON MR, 2005, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V93, P3699
KAPADIA MK, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P12073
KAYSER C, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P1910
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
MARTINEZ LM, 2005, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P372
MATA ML, 2005, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V93, P919
MECHLER F, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1017
NOLT MJ, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P1708
NOWAK LG, 2005, J NEUROSCI, V25, P1866
OZEKI H, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P1428
PRIEBE NJ, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P1113
RINGACH DL, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P468
RINGACH DL, 2004, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V558, P717
ROBERTS MJ, 2005, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V93, P2062
SCENIAK MP, 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P733
SCENIAK MP, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V88, P1363
SKOTTUN BC, 1991, VISION RES, V31, P1079
SMYTH D, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P4746
SOLOMON SG, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P338
STETTLER DD, 2002, NEURON, V36, P739
TAO L, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P366
TOURYAN J, 2005, NEURON, V45, P781
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
USREY WM, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V89, P1003
VANDERSMAGT MJ, 2005, IN PRESS J NEUROPHYS
WELIKY M, 2003, NEURON, V37, P703
WIELAARD J, 2005, EXTRACLASSICAL RECEP
ZHANG B, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P5862
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
44
AUG
2005
15
4
459
464
ISI:000231660000012
P
J
T
A Marrelec, G
U Daunizeau, J
Pelegrini-Issac, M
Doyon, J
Benali, H
T
Conditional correlation as a measure of mediated interactivity in fMRI and
I
S IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
O
A Many measures have been proposed so far to extract brain functional interacti
B resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography
Unfortunately, none has been able to provide a relevant, self-contained, a
interaction. In this paper, we propose a first step in this direction. We first
together with a cross-modal definition of interaction. In this setting, we
shared by some measures of interaction proposed in the literature. We show
nonlinear correlation, mutual information, generalized synchronization, phas
and phase locking value (PLV) actually measure the same quantity (namely c
investigating linear interactions between independently and identically di
We also demonstrate that these data-driven measures can only partly account
that can be expressed by the effective connectivity of structural equation m
gap, we suggest the use of conditional correlation, which is shown to be rel
C ALLEFELD C, 2004, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V14, P417
R ANDERSON TW, 1958, INTRO MULTIVARIATE S
ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
ARNHOLD J, 1999, PHYSICA D, V134, P419
ATTWELL D, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P621
AUBERT A, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1162
BABILONI F, 2004, INT CONGR SER, V1270, P126
BARTOLOMEI F, 2001, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V112, P1746
BELLEC P, 2004, P IEEE ISBI, P848
BISWAL B, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P537
BISWAL BB, 1997, NMR BIOMED, V10, P165
BOCCALETTI S, 2002, PHYS REP, V366, P1
BULLMORE E, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P289
BUZUG T, 1994, PHYSICA D, V72, P343
CHAVEZ M, 2003, J NEUROSCI METH, V124, P113
CHEN W, 1999, FUNCTIONAL MRI, P103
CORDES D, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1636
DASILVA FHL, 1980, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V50, P449
DAVID O, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1277
DAVID O, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V20, P1743
DAVID O, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V21, P659
FRACKOWIAK RSJ, 2003, HUMAN BRAIN FUNCTION
FRISTON KJ, 1993, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V1, P69
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P153
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
FRISTON KJ, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P48
FRISTON KJ, 2001, BRAIN RES BULL, V54, P275
FRISTON KJ, 2001, SCAND J PSYCHOL, V42, P167
FRISTON KJ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V19, P1273
GAVRILESCU M, 2004, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V21, P49
GONZALEZLIMA F, 1995, MATH COMPUT SIMULAT, V40, P115
GRAY RM, 1990, ENTROPY INFORM THEOR
GROSS J, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P694
HAMALAINEN M, 1993, REV MOD PHYS, V65, P413
HORWITZ B, 2003, NEUROIMAGE 1, V19, P466
HUETTEL SA, 2004, FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC
HUMBERTDROZ H, 2001, MEMOIRE DIPLOME DETU, V70
JAYNES ET, 2003, PROBABILITY THEORY L, V1
JEFFREYS H, 1939, THEORY PROBABILITY
JEONG J, 2001, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V112, P827
JONES M, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V22, P956
KAMINSKI M, 2001, BIOL CYBERN, V85, P145
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
LACHAUX JP, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P194
LAHAYE PJ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V20, P962
LEE L, 2003, NEUROIMAGE 1, V19, P457
LEVANQUYEN M, 1999, PHYSICA D, V127, P250
LI TQ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P442
LOGOTHETIS NK, 2001, NATURE, V412, P150
LUMER ED, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P207
MACKAY DJC, 2003, INFORM THEORY INFERE
MAKIRANTA MJ, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V22, P222
MALMIVUO J, 1981, BIOELECTROMAGNETISM
MARTINEZMONTES E, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V22, P1023
MCINTOSH AR, 1996, NEUROIMAGE 1, V3, P143
MORMANN F, 2000, PHYSICA D, V144, P358
NA SH, 2002, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V113, P1954
NIKI K, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, S484
NUNEZ PL, 1981, ELECT FIELDS BRAIN
NUNEZ PL, 1997, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V103, P499
NUNEZ PL, 2000, BRAIN TOPOGR, V13, P79
PENNY WD, 2004, NEUROIMAGE S1, V23, S264
PENNY WD, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V22, P1157
PERLBARG V, 2004, P IEEE ISBI, P852
RAMNANI N, 2004, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V56, P613
RIEHLE A, 1997, SCIENCE
RULKOV NF, 1995, PHYS REV E, V51, P980
SARVAS J, 1987, PHYS MED BIOL, V32, P11
SHULMAN RG, 2004, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V27, P8
SPORNS O, 2004, TRENDS COGN SCI, V8, P418
SRINIVASAN R, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P5435
STAM CJ, 1996, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V99, P24
STONE JV, 2002, TRENDS COGN SCI, V6, P327
SUN FT, 2004, NEUROIMAGE, V21, P647
TALLONBAUDRY C, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P4244
TEDESCHI W, 2004, PHYSICA A, V344, P705
TREISMAN A, 1996, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V6, P171
TRUJILLOBARRETO NJ, 2001, INT J BIOELECTROMAG, V3
VARELA F, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P229
WENDLING F, 2003, BRAIN 6, V126, P1449
XIONG JH, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P151
XU JH, 1997, PHYSICA D, V106, P363
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
83
SEP
2005
53
9
3503
3516
ISI:000231318900014
S
Knoblauch, A
Pulvermuller, F
Sequence detector networks and associative learning of grammatical categor
BIOMIMETIC NEURAL LEARNING FOR INTELLIGENT ROBOTS: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CO
NEUROSCIENCE
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
A fundamental prerequisite for language is the ability to distinguish word seq
well-formed from ungrammatical word strings and to generalise rules of syntact
of constituents. In this work, we extend a neural model of syntactic brain
syntactic sequence detectors (SDs). Elementary SDs are neural units that spec
of constituent words AB, but not (or much less) to the reverse sequence BA.
original version of the SD model (Pulvermuller, Theory in Biosciences, 200
variants taking advantage of optimised neuronal response functions, non-line
and leaky integration of neuronal input accumulating over time. A biologicall
including a network of several SDs is used to demonstrate that associative
leads to learning of word sequences, formation of neural representations o
linking of sequence detectors into neuronal assemblies that may provide a
rule knowledge. We propose that these syntactic neuronal assemblies (SNAs)
syntactic regularities from already encountered strings to new grammatical
C BRAITENBERG V, 1997, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V20, P229
R CHOMSKY N, 1957, SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES
DESTEXHE A, KINETIC MODELS SYNAP, CH1
EGELHAAF M, 1989, J OPT SOC AM A, V6, P1070
ELMAN J, 1996, RETHINKING INNATENES
ELMAN JL, 1990, COGNITIVE SCI, V14, P179
FUSTER J, 1999, MEMORY CEREBRAL CORT
HAUSER MD, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P1569
KLEENE SC, 1956, AUTOMATA STUDIES, P3
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V44, P19
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
KNOBLAUCH A, 2005, UNPUB ASSOCIATIVE LE
KOCH C, 1998, METHODS NEURONAL MOD
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PULVERMULLER F, 2002, PROG NEUROBIOL, V67, P85
PULVERMULLER F, 2003, NEUROSCIENCE LANGUAG
PULVERMULLER F, 2003, THEOR BIOSCI, V122, P87
PULVERMULLER F, 2005, UNPUB EMERGENCE DISC
REICHARDT W, 1959, Z NATURFORSCH B, V14, P674
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
21
2005
3575
31
53
ISI:000230754900003
P
S
T
A Markert, H
U Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
T
Detecting sequences and understanding language with neural associative mem
I
S BIOMIMETIC NEURAL LEARNING FOR INTELLIGENT ROBOTS: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CO
O NEUROSCIENCE
S
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
E
A Using associative memories and sparse distributed representations we have dev
B to associate words with objects, properties like colors, and actions. This
context to enable a robot to respond to spoken commands like "bot show plum
cup". This involves parsing and understanding of simple sentences and "sym
relating the nouns to concrete objects sensed by the camera and recognized
visual input.
C BRAITENBERG V, 1978, LECTURE NOTES BIOMAT, V21, P171
R CHOMSKY N, 1957, SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES
FAY R, COMBINING VISUAL ATT
FAY R, 2004, 3 WORKSH SOAVE2004 S
FAY R, 2004, IN PRESS ULM NEURORO
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HOPCROFT J, 1969, FORMAL LANGUAGES THE
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KNOBLAUCH A, SEQUENCE DETECTOR NE
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
KNOBLAUCH A, 2004, 403 AAAI, P10
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, CYBERNETICS SYSTEMS
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1987, REAL BRAINS ARTIFICA
PALM G, 1990, BRAIN THEORY
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
PALM G, 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V2, P97
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P253
PULVERMULLER F, 2003, NEUROSCIENCE LANGUAG
RIZZOLATTI G, 1999, ARCH ITAL BIOL, V137, P85
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
WERMTER S, 2005, BIOMIMETIC NEURAL LE
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
26
R
P
2005
Y
V
3575
L
B
107
P
E
117
P
U
ISI:000230754900007
T
E
R
P
S
T
A Fay, R
U Kaufmann, U
Knoblauch, A
Markert, H
Palm, G
T Combining visual attention, object recognition and associative information
I system
S BIOMIMETIC NEURAL LEARNING FOR INTELLIGENT ROBOTS: INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, CO
O NEUROSCIENCE
S
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
E
A We have implemented a neurobiologically plausible system on a robot that integ
B recognition, language and action processing using a coherent cortex-like a
associative memories. This system enables the robot to respond to spoken c
or "bot put apple to yellow cup". The scenario for this is a robot close t
certain kinds of fruit and other simple objects. Tasks such as finding and
a complex visual scene according to spoken or typed commands can be demons
and understanding of simple sentences, relating the nouns to concrete obje
coordinating motor output with planning and sensory processing.
C BISHOP CM, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
R BROOMHEAD DS, 1988, COMPLEX SYST, V2, P321
BROWNE A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P1331
DUDA RO, 2001, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI
FAY R, 2001, 3 IWK WORKSH SOAVE20
FAY R, 2001, VIDEO MIRRORBOT DEMO
FOLEY J, 2003, COMPUTER GRAPHICS
FREEMAN WT, 1995, INT WOKRSH AUT FACE
GONZALES RC, 1992, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEH NEUROPSYCHOL
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
JSHNE B, 1997, DIGITALE BIDVERARBEI
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, 5 U ULM, V5
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
KNOBLAUCH A, 2004, AAAI WORKSH ANCH SYM
KNOBLAUCH A, 2004, AAAI WORKSH MENL PAR, P10
MCGARRY K, 1999, NEURAL COMPUTING SUR, V2, P62
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
PALM G, 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V2, P97
PALM G, 1997, INF 97 INF INN 27 JA
PULVERMULLER F, 2003, NEUROSCIENCE LANGUAG
SCHNRMANN J, 1996, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SCHWENKER F, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P439
SMITH AR, 1978, COMPUTER GRAPHICS, V12, P12
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
TOU JT, 1979, PATTERN RECOGNITION
UTZ H, 2002, IEEE T ROBOTIC AUTOM, V18, P493
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
32
2005
3575
118
143
ISI:000230754900008
P
J
T
A Voultsidou, M
U Dodel, S
Herrmann, JM
T
Neural networks approach to clustering of activity in fMRI data
I
S
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
O
A Clusters of correlated activity in functional magnetic resonance imaging d
B interest and indicate interacting brain areas. Because the extraction of c
complex, we apply an approximative method which is based on artificial neur
find clusters of various degrees of connectivity ranging between the two e
connectivity components. We propose a criterion which allows to evaluate the
based on the robustness with respect to parameter variations. Exploiting t
we can show that regions of substantial correlation with an external stimulus
from other activity.
C AMIT D, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUCNC
R BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUMGARTNER R, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P734
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BISWAL B, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P537
BOMZE IM, 1999, HDB COMBINATORIAL OP, V4
CORDES D, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1636
CORDES D, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P305
DIESTEL R, 2000, GRAPH THEORY
DODEL S, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V44, P1065
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GROSS J, 1998, GRAPH THEORY ITS APP
HERTZ JA, 1991, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, P79
JAGOTA A, 1995, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V6, P724
LOHMANN G, 2002, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V21, P485
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P2
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
THIRION B, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V20, P34
TONONI G, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P133
TSODYKS MV, 1988, EUROPHYS LETT, V6, P101
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
22
AUG
2005
24
8
987
996
ISI:000230851800006
J
Paus, T
Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
When engaged by a stimulus, different nodes of a neural circuit respond in a
ask whether there is a cause and effect in such interregional interactions
can infer causality in functional connectivity by employing a 'perturb and m
brain, this has been achieved by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation
tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalog
this approach by reviewing some of our TMS/PET work, and will conclude by di
and theoretical challenges facing those studying neural connectivity using
C ANGELUCCI A, 2003, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V97, P141
R AVOLI M, 1997, CAN J PHYSIOL PHARM, V75, P526
BARRETT J, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V29, P1172
BOHNING DE, 1998, INVEST RADIOL, V33, P336
BROCA P, 1861, B SOC ANAT PARIS, V6, P398
CHEN R, 2000, MUSCLE NERVE S, V9, S26
CHEN R, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V89, P1256
CHOUINARD PA, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P1071
COHEN MR, 2004, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V14, P169
EICHLER M, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V360, P953
FOX P, 1997, NEUROREPORT, V8, P2787
FRITSCH G, 1870, ARCH ANAT PHYSL WISS, V37, P300
GERSCHLAGER W, 2001, NEUROLOGY, V57, P449
GRANGER CWJ, 1969, ECONOMETRICA, V37, P424
GROSBRAS MH, 2002, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V14, P1109
GROSBRAS MH, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V18, P3121
HARRISON LM, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V360, P1075
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P7
HILGETAG CC, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P953
ILMONIEMI RJ, 1997, NEUROREPORT, V8, P3537
JOHNSON RR, 1996, J COMP NEUROL, V368, P383
KOHLER S, 2004, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V16, P178
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KUJIRAI T, 1993, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V471, P501
LEYTON ASF, 1917, Q J EXP PHYSIOL, V11, P135
MACDONALD PA, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P962
MACNEIL MA, 1997, EXP BRAIN RES, V114, P24
MAEDA F, 2000, EXP BRAIN RES, V133, P425
MARTIN JH, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V86, P145
MATELLI M, 1997, HANDB NEUR, V11, P9
MATELLI M, 2000, ADV NEUROL, V84, P51
MUELLBACHER W, 2000, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V111, P1002
NAKAMURA H, 1997, J PHYSL, V498, P823
PAKKENBERG B, 1997, J COMP NEUROL, V384, P312
PARENT A, 1995, BRAIN RES REV, V20, P91
PASCUALLEONE A, 2000, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V10, P232
PASCUALLEONE A, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P510
PAUS T, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P3178
PAUS T, 2001, EUR J NEUROSCI, V14, P1405
PAUS T, 2002, BRAIN MAPPING METHOD, P691
PAUS T, 2004, J PSYCHIATR NEUROSCI, V29, P268
PAYNE BR, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P535
PENFIELD W, 1950, CEREBRAL CORTEX MAN
PENNY W, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V360, P983
RUSHWORTH MFS, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P2577
SCOVILLE WB, 1957, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V20, P11
SHAO ZW, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P7353
SHAO ZW, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V81, P1014
SIEBNER HR, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, P943
SIEBNER HR, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V54, P956
SIEBNER HR, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V12, P157
STRAFELLA AP, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V85, P2624
STRAFELLA AP, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P1
STRAFELLA AP, 2003, BRAIN 12, V126, P2609
TAKADA M, 1998, EXP BRAIN RES, V120, P114
VANDUFFEL W, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P7617
WERHAHN KJ, 1999, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V517, P591
ZIEMANN U, 1996, ANN NEUROL, V40, P367
ZIEMANN U, 1996, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V496, P873
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
59
MAY 29
2005
360
1457
1109
1114
ISI:000230676700021
S
Martinez, LM
Alonso, JM
Multielectrode analysis of information flow through cat primary visual cor
MECHANISMS, SYMBOLS AND MODELS UNDERLYING COGNITION, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Cells in cortical layer 4 contact layer 2+3 neurons that, in turn, send th
to the infragranular layers. This simple outline of feedforward connection
followed by visual information through cat primary visual cortex. We studied
among physiologically identified neurons recorded at different depths within
columns using multielectrode recordings and cross-correlation analysis. Our
that the projection from layer 4 to layers 2+3 is actually split in parallel
that are defined by differences in the dynamic properties of the connections an
decode the temporal information embedded on every spike train.
C ALONSO JM, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P395
R AN Y, 2004, NEURON, V44, P23
BRECHT M, 2003, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V553, P243
BRODY CD, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V80, P3345
BRUMBERG JC, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V82, P1808
CALLAWAY EM, 1998, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V21, P47
CALLAWAY EM, 2004, NEURAL NETWORKS, V17, P625
CHISUM HJ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P2947
DEUCHARS J, 1994, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V478, P423
DIAMOND ME, 1994, SCIENCE, V265, P1885
LINDEN JF, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P83
MARKRAM H, 1997, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V500, P409
MARTINEZ LM, 2001, NEURON, V32, P515
MARTINEZ LM, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P321
MARTINEZ LM, 2005, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P372
MASON A, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P72
MOOSER F, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V8, P872
PERKEL DH, 1967, BIOPHYS J, V7, P391
RINGACH DL, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P5639
STRATFORD KJ, 1996, NATURE, V382, P258
N
20
R
P
2005
Y
V
3561
L
B
233
P
E
241
P
U
ISI:000230377200025
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Chuang, KH
U Wu, MT
Lin, YR
Hsieh, KS
Wu, ML
Tsai, SY
Ko, CW
Chung, HW
T
I
S
O
A
B
Application of model-free analysis in the MR assessment of pulmonary perfu
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI has been used to quantitatively evalua
on the assumption of a gamma-variate function and an arterial input functi
However, these assumptions may be too simplistic and may not be valid in pathol
in patients with complex inflow patterns (such as in congenital heart diseas
methods make minimal assumptions on the data and could overcome these pitfal
clustering methods-Kohonen clustering network (KCN) and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)pixel time-course patterns. The results from seven normal volunteers show th
for discriminating vessels and compartments in the pulmonary circulation. Pa
of acquired or congenital pulmonary perfusion disorders demonstrate that p
in a concise map that combines information of the mean transit time (MTT) and
The method was found to provide greater insight into the perfusion dynamic
current model-based analyses, and may serve as a basis for optimal hemodyn
the interrogated perfusion compartments.
C BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
R BEZDEK JC, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
CARROLL TJ, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P1007
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
FRATZ S, 2002, CIRCULATION, V106, P1510
HARALDSETH O, 1999, MAGMA, V8, P146
HATABU H, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V36, P503
HATABU H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P1033
HOWARTH NR, 1999, EUR RADIOL, V9, P1574
KAUCZOR HU, 2000, EUR J RADIOL, V34, P196
KOHONEN T, 1995, SELF ORG MAPS
LEVIN DL, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P166
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MURASE K, 2001, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P797
PAL NR, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P549
ROSEN BR, 1990, MAGNET RESON MED, V14, P249
SCARTH GB, 1995, P INT SOC MAGN RES M, P238
SLAVIN GS, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V219, P258
THOMAS DL, 2000, PHYS MED BIOL, V45, R97
TORHEIM G, 2001, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P577
UEMATSU H, 2001, EUR J RADIOL, V37, P155
N
21
R
P
AUG
D
P 2005
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
54
2
299
308
ISI:000230765700007
J
Alonso, JM
Swadlow, HA
Thalamocortical specificity and the synthesis of sensory cortical receptiv
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
A persistent and fundamental question in sensory cortical physiology concerns
fields of layer-4 neurons are synthesized from their thalamic inputs. Acco
proposed more than 40 years ago, simple receptive fields in layer 4 of pri
from the convergence of highly specific thalamocortical inputs (e.g., geni
receptive fields overlap the ON subregions of layer 4 simple cells). Here,
visual cortex that provide support for this high specificity of thalamic in
cells. In addition, we review studies of GABAergic interneurons in the somat
receptive fields that are generated by a very different mechanism: the nonspe
inputs with different response properties. We hypothesize that these 2 modes of
onto subpopulations of excitatory and inhibitory neurons constitute a genera
and account for much of the diversity seen in layer-4 receptive fields.
C ABELES M, 1991, CORTICONICS NEURAL C
R ALONSO JM, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P4002
AMITAI Y, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P4142
AZOUZ R, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P534
BEIERLEIN M, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P2987
BENYISHAI R, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P3844
BRUNO RM, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P10966
CHUNG S, 1998, NEURON, V20, P1177
CONTRERAS D, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P6936
DOUGLAS RJ, 1995, SCIENCE, V269, P981
FAIREN A, 1984, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P201
FERSTER D, 1983, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V342, P181
FERSTER D, 1986, J NEUROSCI, V6, P1284
FERSTER D, 1996, NATURE, V380, P249
FERSTER D, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P441
GALARRETA M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P72
GIBSON JR, 1999, NATURE, V402, P75
GILBERT CD, 1979, NATURE, V280, P120
GONCHAR Y, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P347
GRIFFITH JS, 1963, BIOPHYS J, V3, P299
GRIFFITH JS, 1967, NATURE, V215, P1043
GUPTA A, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P273
HIRSCH JA, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P9517
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HOUSER CR, 1983, J NEUROCYTOL, V12, P617
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
KAWAGUCHI Y, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P476
KELLY JP, 1974, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V238, P515
LAMPL I, 2001, NEURON, V30, P263
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
LEVICK WR, 1972, INVEST OPHTHALMOL, V11, P302
MARKRAM H, 2004, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V5, P793
MARTIN KAC, 1984, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V353, P463
MARTINEZ LM, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P321
MASTRONARDE DN, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V57, P381
MCMULLEN NT, 1994, BRAIN RES, V660, P225
MILLER KD, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V11, P488
MILLER KD, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P73
MILLER LM, 2001, NEURON, V32, P151
MONIER C, 2003, NEURON, V37, P663
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1969, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V32, P452
PETERS A, 1993, CEREB CORTEX, V3, P69
PINTO DJ, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P33
REID RC, 1995, NATURE, V378, P281
REN JQ, 1992, EXP BRAIN RES, V92, P1
RINGACH DL, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P468
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SHERMAN SM, 2001, EXPLORING THALAMUS
SIMONS DJ, 1978, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V41, P798
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
SWADLOW HA, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V57, P977
SWADLOW HA, 1988, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V59, P1162
SWADLOW HA, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V62, P288
SWADLOW HA, 1991, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V66, P1392
SWADLOW HA, 1994, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V71, P437
SWADLOW HA, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V73, P1584
SWADLOW HA, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P567
SWADLOW HA, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P403
SWADLOW HA, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P25
TANAKA K, 1983, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V49, P1303
TOLHURST DJ, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V66, P607
USREY WM, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V82, P3527
WESTHEIMER G, 1977, VISION RES, V17, P941
WHITE EL, 1989, CORTICAL CIRCUITS
WOOLSEY TA, 1970, BRAIN RES, V17, P205
WOOLSEY TA, 1975, J COMP NEUROL, V164, P79
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
66
JUL
2005
94
1
26
32
ISI:000230135500005
P
J
T
A Fell, J
U Elger, CE
Fernandez, G
T
Mediotemporal gamma activity and declarative memory
I
S
KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE
O
A Purpose: Human declarative memory, i.e. the consciously accessible long-ter
B crucially depends on two structures within the medial temporal lobe (MTL),
hippocampus. However, so far there was no direct evidence for an interaction
during memory formation. Transient coupling of neural assemblies can be ac
synchronisation of gamma activity, i.e. EEG activity in the frequency range a
of 9 patients with unilateral MTL-epilepsies the event-related EEG was recorde
a word-memory task. The EEG responses of the non-pathological MTL for later r
were compared. Additionally, the continuous EEG was recorded during sleep wi
in a group of 8 patients. Phase synchronisation and spectral coherence wer
a neural coupling. Results: Successful memory formation is accompanied by
increase of phase synchronisation between rhinal cortex and hippocampus an
memory-related synchronisation changes are interindividually correlated wi
rhinal-hippocampal theta (4-7Hz) coherence. Compared to the waking state r
decreases during sleep, most pronounced within the gamma-band. Discussion: T
probably reflect a slowly modulated connectivity between rhinal cortex and
synchronisation accomplishes the fast coupling and decoupling processes, whic
the information transfer between both structures. The reduced rhinal-hippo
may represent an indirect electrophysiological correlate of the diminished abi
sleep.
C ABBOTT LF, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI S, V3, P1178
R ABELES M, 1982, ISRAEL J MED SCI, V18, P83
ACHERMANN P, 1998, NEUROSCIENCE, V85, P1195
ALONSO JM, 1996, NATURE, V383, P815
AMARAL DG, 1990, HUMAN NERVOUS SYSTEM, P711
AZOUZ R, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P8110
BARLOW HB, 1972, PERCEPTION, V1, P371
BRESSLER SL, 1987, BRAIN RES, V409, P285
BREWER JB, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1185
BROSCH M, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P2715
BULLOCK TH, 1995, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V95, P161
BUZSAKI G, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P81
CAPLAN JB, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V86, P368
CHROBAK JJ, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P388
CHROBAK JJ, 1998, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V22, P303
CRICK F, 1995, NATURE, V375, P121
DESMEDT JE, 1994, NEUROSCI LETT, V168, P126
DUMERMUTH G, 1983, EUR NEUROL, V22, P322
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1993, NEUROREPORT, V4, P243
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
ENGEL AK, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P704
ENGEL AK, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P16
FELL J, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P1259
FELL J, 2002, REV NEUROSCIENCE, V13, P299
FELL J, 2003, BRAIN RES REV, V42, P265
FELL J, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V17, P1082
FELL J, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V18, P1711
FERNANDEZ G, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P1841
FERNANDEZ G, 1999, SCIENCE, V285, P1582
FERNANDEZ G, 2002, HIPPOCAMPUS, V12, P514
FERNANDEZ G, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P281
FOSSE MJ, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P1
FREEMAN WJ, 1978, ELECTROENCEPHALOGR C, V44, P586
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
FRIES P, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P194
GOODENOUGH DR, 1991, MIND SLEEP PSYCHOL P, P143
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
GROSS DW, 1999, NEUROSCIENCE, V94, P1005
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HERRMANN CS, 2004, TRENDS COGN SCI, V8, P347
HOBSON JA, 2000, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V23, P793
JENSEN O, 1996, LEARN MEMORY, V3, P243
JENSEN O, 1996, LEARN MEMORY, V3, P264
JENSEN O, 2002, EUR J NEUROSCI, V15, P1395
KAHANA MJ, 1999, NATURE, V399, P781
KEIL A, 2001, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V25, P527
KLIMESCH W, 1996, NEUROREPORT, V7, P1235
KLIMESCH W, 1997, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V34, P169
KONIG P, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P130
KREIMAN G, 2000, NATURE, V408, P357
LABERGE D, 1997, CONSCIOUS COGN, V6, P149
LEBEDEV MA, 1995, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V2, P313
LLINAS R, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P2078
LUTZENBERGER W, 1995, NEUROSCI LETT, V183, P39
MALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
MANN K, 1997, SLEEP, V20, P753
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MENON V, 1996, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V98, P89
MILTNER WHR, 1999, NATURE, V397, P434
MOLLE M, 2002, EUR J NEUROSCI, V15, P923
MOSER MB, 1998, HIPPOCAMPUS, V8, P608
MULLER MM, 1996, EXP BRAIN RES, V112, P96
MULLER MM, 2001, VIS COGN, V8, P579
NIEDERMEYER E, 1999, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAP
NIELSEN T, 1990, BRAIN COGNITION, V14, P113
OKEEFE J, 1993, HIPPOCAMPUS, V3, P317
OTTEN LJ, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P279
PALLER KA, 1992, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V84, P269
PESARAN B, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P805
PINEL JPJ, 2001, BIOPSYCHOLOGIE
RAGHAVACHARI S, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P3175
RECHTSCHAFFEN A, 1968, 204 NIH
RHEILLY CE, 2002, J NEUROL, V249, P237
RODRIGUEZ E, 1999, NATURE, V397, P430
ROY SA, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2462
SARNTHEIN J, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P7092
SKAGGS WE, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P149
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
STERIADE M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P3266
STICKGOLD R, 1997, SLEEP RES, V26, P279
TALLONBAUDRY C, 1999, TRENDS COGN SCI, V3, P151
TESCHE CD, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P919
USREY WM, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P5461
VARELA F, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P229
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1981, MPI BIOPHYSICAL CHEM, P81
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1999, NEURON, V24, P95
WAGNER AD, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1188
WAGNER AD, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P1159
WEISS S, 2000, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V9, P299
WEISS S, 2000, NEUROREPORT, V11, P2357
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
92
JUN
2005
36
2
49
59
ISI:000229887100001
J
Knoblauch, A
Statistical implications of clipped Hebbian learning of cell assemblies
NEUROCOMPUTING
In this study binary associative networks of the Willshaw type are analyze
of clipped Hebbian learning on the distribution of postsynaptic potentials
activation patterns. It is shown that the variance in the postsynaptic pot
of the stimulation strength if the synapses have been generated by Hebbian
patterns, but only linearly for independent random synapses. This result b
analysis of associative memory and the detection of Hebbian cell assemblie
experiments. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
R BUCKINGHAM J, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P407
BUCKINGHAM JT, 1991, THESIS U EDINBURGH
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2714, P325
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
NADAL JP, 1991, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V24, P1093
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
PALM G, 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V2, P97
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
STEINBUCH K, 1961, KYBERNETIK, V1, P36
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
15
JUN
2005
65
647
652
ISI:000229663600084
J
Hutt, A
Atay, FM
Analysis of nonlocal neural fields for both general and gamma-distributed
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA
This work studies the stability of equilibria in spatially extended neuron
the model equation from statistical properties of the neuron population. The
equation includes synaptic and space-dependent transmission delay for both
synaptic connectivities. The latter connectivity type reveals infinite, fi
self-connectivities. The work derives conditions for stationary and nonstat
kernel types. In addition, a nonlinear analysis for general kernels yields
of the Turing instability. To compare the results to findings for partial d
two typical PDE-types are derived from the examined model equation, namely t
equation and the Swift-Hohenberg equation. Hence, the discussed integro-diff
these PDEs. In the case of the gamma-distributed kernels, the stability cond
of the mean excitatory and inhibitory interaction ranges. As a novel finding,
in fields with local inhibition-lateral excitation, while wave instabiliti
excitation and lateral inhibition. Numerical simulations support the analy
Published by Elsevier B.V.
C AMARI SI, 1977, BIOL CYBERN, V27, P77
R AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
ATAY FM, 2005, SIAM J APPL MATH, V65, P644
BENYISHAI R, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P3844
BRASIC JR, 1998, PERCEPT MOTOR SKIL 1, V86, P851
BRESSLOFF PC, 1997, INT J MOD PHYS B, V11, P2343
BRESSLOFF PC, 2002, PHYS REV LETT, V89
BRESSLOFF PC, 2002, PHYSICA D, V173, P226
BRINGUIER V, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P695
CASTETS V, 1990, PHYS REV LETT, V64, P2953
COOMBES S, 2003, PHYSICA D, V178, P219
COOMBES S, 2004, SIAM J APPL DYN SYST, V34, P574
COWAN J, 1978, STUDIES MATH BIOL 1, P67
COWAN JD, 1968, P 1967 NATO C NEUR N, P181
CROOK SM, 1997, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V4, P161
CROSS MC, 1993, REV MOD PHYS, V65, P851
DASILVA FL, 2003, EPILEPSIA S12, V44, P72
DAYAN P, 2001, THEORETICAL NEUROSCI
ECCLES JC, 1967, CEREBELLUM NEURONAL
EGGERT J, 2000, PHYS REV E, V61, P1855
EGGERT J, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P1923
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
ERMENTROUT B, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P679
ERMENTROUT B, 1998, REP PROG PHYS, V61, P353
ERMENTROUT GB, 1979, BIOL CYBERN, V34, P137
ERMENTROUT GB, 1980, SIAM J APPL MATH, V38, P1
FELLER W, 1966, INTRO PROBABILITY TH
FRANCOIS O, 2000, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V11, P211
FREEMAN WJ, 1974, IEEE T BIOMEDICAL EN, V21, P350
FREEMAN WJ, 1975, MASS ACTION NERVOUS
FREEMAN WJ, 1992, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V2, P451
FREEMAN WJ, 2000, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V10, P2307
FREEMAN WJ, 2000, NEURODYNAMICS EXPLOR
FRISTON KJ, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P164
GAZZANIGA M, 2000, NEW COGNITIVE NEUROS
GERSTNER W, 1995, PHYS REV E, V51, P738
GERSTNER W, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P43
GOUGH B, 2003, GNU SCI LIB REFERENC
GUTKIN BS, 2000, NEUROCOMPUTING, V32, P391
HAKEN H, 1983, ADV SYNERGETICS
HAKEN H, 1996, PRINCIPLES BRAIN FUN
HUBEL DH, 1963, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V26, P994
HUTT A, 2003, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V14, P351
HUTT A, 2003, PHYSICA D, V177, P203
HUTT A, 2004, PHYS REV E 1, V70
ISAACSON SH, 1993, NEUROLOGY, V43, P1619
JIRSA VK, 1996, PHYS REV LETT, V77, P960
JIRSA VK, 2004, NEUROINFORMATICS, V2, P183
KATZ B, 1966, NERVE MUSCLE SYNAPSE
KELSO J, 1995, DYNAMIC PATTERNS SEL
KISHIMOTO K, 1979, J MATH BIOL, V7, P303
KISTLER WM, 1998, PHYSICA D, V114, P273
KNIGHT BW, 1972, J GEN PHYSIOL, V59, P734
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V52, P301
LAING CR, 2002, SIAM J APPL MATH, V63, P62
LAING CR, 2003, SIAM J APPL DYN SYST, V2, P487
LEVY P, 1939, COMPOS MATH, V7, P283
LILEY DTJ, 2002, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V13, P67
MATTHEWS PC, 1998, PHYSICA D, V116, P81
MOSHER JC, 1992, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V39, P541
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1957, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V20, P408
NUNEZ PL, 1995, NEOCORTICAL DYNAMICS
OSAN R, 2002, PHYSICA D, V163, P217
PERKO L, 1998, DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIO
PINTO DJ, 2001, SIAM J APPL MATH, V62, P206
RENNIE CJ, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V86, P457
RINZEL J, 1998, SCIENCE, V279, P1351
ROBINSON PA, 1997, PHYS REV E B, V56, P826
ROBINSON PA, 2001, PHYS REV E 1, V63
SANDERSON KJ, 1971, J COMP NEUROL, V143, P101
SINGER W, 1999, NEURON, V24, P49
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
STERIADE M, 1993, SCIENCE, V262, P679
SWIFT J, 1977, PHYS REV A, V15, P319
TAMAS G, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P6352
TASS P, 1999, PHASE RESETTING MED
TURING AM, 1952, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V237, P37
UHL C, 1999, ANAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGI
VANVREESWIJK C, 1996, SCIENCE, V274, P1724
VIBERT JF, 1998, BIOSYSTEMS, V48, P255
WENNEKERS T, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P1721
WENNEKERS T, 2002, NEURAL COMPUT, V14, P1801
WILSON HR, 1972, BIOPHYS J, V12, P1
WILSON HR, 1973, KYBERNETIK, V13, P55
WRIGHT JJ, 1996, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V19, P285
WRIGHT JJ, 1997, BIOL CYBERN, V76, P181
WRIGHT JJ, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P131
WRIGHT JJ, 2001, BIOSYSTEMS, V63, P15
N
88
R
P
APR 1
D
P 2005
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
203
1-2
30
54
ISI:000228939700003
P
J
T
A Blanche, TJ
U Spacek, MA
Hetke, JF
Swindale, NV
T
Polytrodes: High-density silicon electrode arrays for large-scale multiuni
I
S
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
O
A We developed a variety of 54-channel high-density silicon electrode arrays (p
B from large numbers of neurons spanning millimeters of brain. In cat visual c
simultaneous recordings from > 100 well-isolated neurons. Using standard c
provide a quality of single-unit isolation that surpasses that attainable
successful in vivo recording and precise electrode positioning are describ
high-bandwidth continuous data-acquisition system designed specifically fo
impedance meter for testing polytrode site integrity. Despite having small
earlier silicon-based electrodes of this type, these polytrodes have negli
comparable reliability, and low site impedances and are capable of making highwith minimal tissue damage. The relatively benign nature of planar electro
histologically and in experiments where the polytrode was repeatedly advan
microns over periods of many hours. It was possible to maintain stable rec
adjacent to the polytrode without change in their absolute positions, neuroph
properties.
C ALONSO JM, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P395
R ANDERSON DJ, 1989, IEEE T BIOMED ENG, V36, P693
BAI Q, 2001, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V48, P911
BARTHO P, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P600
BIERER JA, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P478
BISHOP PO, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V162, P409
BISHOP PO, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V162, P451
BLAND JAC, 2003, CURR APPL PHYS, V3, P429
BUCHWALD JS, 1973, BIOELECTRIC RECORDIN, P201
BUZSAKI G, 1992, SCIENCE, V256, P1025
BUZSAKI G, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P1587
BUZSAKI G, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P446
CAMPBELL PK, 1991, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V38, P758
CHEN JK, 1997, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V44, P760
CHURCHLAND PS, 1992, COMPUTATIONAL BRAIN
CSICSVARI J, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P1314
CUI XY, 2003, BIOMATERIALS, V24, P777
DICARLO JJ, 1996, J NEUROSCI METH, V64, P75
DRAKE KL, 1988, IEEE T BIOMED ENG, V35, P719
ENSELL G, 2000, MED BIOL ENG COMPUT, V38, P175
FATT P, 1957, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V20, P27
FREUND TF, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P347
FROMHERZ P, 2003, NANOELECTRONICS INFO, P781
FU YX, 2002, SCIENCE, V296, P1999
GILBERT CD, 2001, NEURON, V31, P681
GRAY CM, 1995, J NEUROSCI METH, V63, P43
HARRIS KD, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P401
HENZE DA, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P390
HETHERINGTON PA, 1999, SOC NEUR ABSTR, V25, P1422
HETHERINGTON PA, 1999, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V16, P637
HETKE JF, 1994, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V41, P314
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HOOGERWERF AC, 1994, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V41, P1136
HUBENER M, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P9270
HUMPHREY DR, 1976, BIOL FDN BIOMEDICAL
JOG MS, 2002, J NEUROSCI METH, V117, P141
JOHNSTON D, 1996, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V19, P165
JONES JP, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V58, P1187
KANDEL A, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P6783
KEWLEY DT, 1997, SENSOR ACTUAT A-PHYS, V58, P27
KOVACS GTA, 1994, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V41, P567
MAGEE JC, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P209
MAHALANOBIS PC, 1936, P NAT I SCI INDIA, V2, P49
MALDONADO PE, 1996, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V13, P509
MALDONADO PE, 1997, SCIENCE, V276, P1551
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MCNAUGHTON BL, 1983, J NEUROSCI METH, V8, P391
MENSINGER AF, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V83, P611
MITZDORF U, 1978, EXP BRAIN RES, V33, P371
MITZDORF U, 1985, PHYSIOL REV, V65, P37
NAJAFI K, 1985, IEEE T ELECTRON DEV, V32, P1206
NAJAFI K, 1986, IEEE J SOLID-ST CIRC, V21, P1035
NAJAFI K, 1990, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V37, P1
NAJAFI K, 1990, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V37, P474
NICHOLSON C, 1975, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V38, P356
NIPARKO JK, 1989, ANN OTO RHINOL LARYN, V98, P965
NORLIN P, 2002, J MICROMECH MICROENG, V12, P414
NOWAK LG, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V89, P1541
OLSHAUSEN BA, 2005, PROBLEMS SYSTEMS NEU
PAZ R, 2004, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V27, P496
PRESS WH, 1994, NUMERICAL RECIPES FO, V77
RATHNASINGHAM R, 2004, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V51, P138
ROSENTHAL F, 1966, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V29, P612
ROUSCHE PJ, 1998, J NEUROSCI METH, V82, P1
ROUSCHE PJ, 1999, IEEE T REHABIL ENG, V7, P56
SPACEK MA, 2003, SOC NEUR ABSTR
SPENCE AJ, 2003, J NEUROSCI METH, V126, P119
STARR A, 1973, IEEE T BIOMED ENG, V20, P291
TAKAHASHI K, 1984, SENSOR ACTUATOR, V5, P89
TOWE AL, 1973, BIOELECTRIC RECORD A, P79
VETTER RJ, 2004, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V51, P896
VORNOV JJ, 1991, EXP NEUROL, V114, P11
WEILAND JD, 2000, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V47, P911
WILSON MA, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P1055
WISE KD, 1991, SCIENCE, V254, P1335
YAO HS, 2001, NEURON, V32, P315
YOON TH, 2000, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V47, P1082
ZHU Z, 2002, CEREB CORTEX, V12, P585
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
78
MAY
2005
93
5
2987
3000
ISI:000228575200058
P
J
T
A
Hecht-Nielsen, R
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
Cogent confabulation
NEURAL NETWORKS
A new model of vertebrate cognition is introduced: maximization of cogency p(a
bar epsilon). This model is shown to be a direct generalization of Aristoteli
related to a calculable quantity. A key aspect of this model is that in Ar
environments it functions logically. However, in non-Aristotelian environm
conclusion with the highest probability of being true (a popular past model of
functions in the manner of the 'duck test;' by finding that conclusion whi
truth of the assumed facts. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C AMIT D, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
R ANDERSON JA, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P413
BENDER EA, 1996, MATH METHODS ARTIFIC
HECHTNIELSEN R, 2004, 0404 U CAL
NILSSON NJ, 1998, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
PEARL J, 2000, CAUSALITY
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
N
7
R
P
MAR
D
P
2005
Y
V
18
L
I
2
S
B
111
P
E
115
P
U
ISI:000228440100001
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
J
Krause, BI
Fundamentals of functional neuroimaging with positron emission tomography
NERVENHEILKUNDE
Functional neuroimaging techniques - in particular positron emission tomograp
B new insights in our understanding of brain function from the molecular up
based on the acquisition and computer-aided analysis of the radioactive de
are labelled to specific molecular probes (tracers). PET allows the in viv
radiotracers of regional blood flow, metabolism or for example receptor bi
neurotransmitter systems. PET studies of regional cerebral blood flow duri
cognitive functions (i.e. memory, speech, attention) hove shed light on pa
specialised brain regions and on a systems level in normal volunteers as well a
impact in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative di
psychiatric diseases. More recent developments include the development of trac
and quantitation of beta-amyloid-plaques in patients suffering from Alzhei
clinical implications within the framework of drug development and therapy
C AGDEPPA ED, 2003, MOL IMAGING BIOL, V5, P404
R BARTENSTEIN P, 2002, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V29, BP43
FOX PT, 1984, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V51, P1109
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P165
GJEDDE A, 1995, PRINCIPLES NUCL MED, P451
GLATTING G, 2004, MED PHYS, V31, P902
HAUTZEL H, 2003, NUKLEARMED-NUCL MED, V42, P197
HERHOLZ K, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P302
HERZOG H, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P645
HORWITZ B, 1994, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V1, P269
HORWITZ B, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P112
KLUNK WE, 2001, LIFE SCI, V69, P1471
KLUNK WE, 2004, ANN NEUROL, V55, P306
KRAUSE BJ, 2000, IMAGING NEURAL MODEL, V13, P847
KRAUSE BJ, 2003, BILDGEBUNG GEHIRNS K
KUWERT T, 1998, NERVENARZT, V69, P1045
MATHIS CA, 2003, J MED CHEM, V46, P2740
MEYER PT, 2003, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V30, P951
MOTTAGHY FM, 2004, FUNKTIONELLE BILDGEB, P3
NORDBERG A, 2004, LANCET NEUROL, V3, P519
PATLAK CS, 1983, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V3, P1
PHELPS ME, 1981, SCIENCE, V211, P1445
ROY CS, 1890, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V11, P85
SCHRECKENBERGER M, 2003, BILDGEBUNG GEHIRNS K
TALAIRACH J, 1988, CO PLANAR STEREOTAXI
WOODS RP, 1992, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V16, P620
ZEKI S, 1990, SIGNAL SENSE LOCAL G, P85
N
28
R
P
2005
Y
V
24
L
I
2
S
B
73
P
E
+
P
U
ISI:000228217700002
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Tao, HW
Poo, MM
Activity-dependent matching of excitatory and inhibitory inputs during ref
fields
NEURON
The receptive field (RF) of single visual neurons undergoes progressive re
It remains largely unknown how the excitatory and inhibitory inputs on single
in a coordinated manner to allow the formation of functionally correct cir
voltage-clamp recording from Xenopus tectal neurons, we found that RFs det
inhibitory inputs in more mature tectal neurons are spatially matched, wit
balanced synaptic excitation and inhibition. This emerges during developmen
in the RF size and a transition from disparate to matched topography of exc
to the tectal neurons. Altering normal spiking activity of tectal neurons by
GABAA receptor activity significantly impeded the developmental reduction an
Thus, appropriate inhibitory activity is essential for the coordinated ref
inhibitory connections.
C ANDERSON JS, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P909
R BENARI Y, 1989, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V416, P303
BENARI Y, 2004, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V9, P728
CHEN CF, 2000, NEURON, V28, P955
CHEN G, 1996, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V494, P451
CLINE HT, 1996, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V61, P95
CONSTANTINEPATO.M, 1990, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V13, P129
DAN Y, 2004, NEURON, V44, P23
DEBSKI EA, 2002, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V12, P93
EGHBALI M, 1997, NATURE, V388, P71
ENGERT F, 2002, NATURE, V419, P470
FAGIOLINI M, 2000, NATURE, V404, P183
FELDMAN DE, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P303
GAZE RM, 1974, P R SOC LOND B, V185, P301
HANOVER JL, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19
HENSCH TK, 1998, SCIENCE, V282, P1504
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HOLMGREN CD, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P8270
HOLT CE, 1983, NATURE, V301, P150
HUANG ZJ, 1999, CELL, V98, P739
HUBEL DH, 1965, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V28, P1041
KATZ LC, 1996, SCIENCE, V274, P1133
LAZAR G, 1973, J ANAT, V116, P347
LIU GS, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P373
LUHMANN HJ, 1991, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V65, P247
MACDONALD RL, 1994, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V17, P569
MARTINEZ LM, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P321
MILLER KD, 1989, SCIENCE, V245, P605
MONIER C, 2003, NEURON, V37, P663
MUELLER AL, 1984, J NEUROSCI, V4, P860
OROURKE NA, 1990, NEURON, V5, P159
OWENS DF, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P6414
OWENS DF, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P715
PRIEBE NJ, 2005, NEURON, V45, P133
PRINCE DA, 1984, ANN NEUROL, V16, S59
ROGERS CJ, 1994, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V475, P69
SAKAGUCHI DS, 1985, J NEUROSCI, V5, P3228
SCHMIDT JT, 1991, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V627, P385
SCHUETT S, 2001, NEURON, V32, P325
SHU YS, 2003, NATURE, V423, P288
STRYKER MP, 1984, INVEST OPHTHALMOL S, V25, P278
TAN AYY, 2004, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V92, P630
TURRIGIANO GG, 2000, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V10, P358
WEHR M, 2003, NATURE, V426, P442
WELIKY M, 1997, NATURE, V386, P680
WILLSHAW DJ, 1976, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V194, P431
WOODIN MA, 2003, NEURON, V39, P807
ZHANG LI, 1998, NATURE, V395, P37
ZHANG LI, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P708
ZHANG LI, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI S, V4, P1207
ZHANG LI, 2003, NATURE, V424, P201
ZHOU Q, 2003, SCIENCE, V300, P1953
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
52
MAR 24
2005
45
6
829
836
P
U
ISI:000228031300005
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Adibi, P
U Meybodi, MR
Safabakhsh, R
T Unsupervised learning of synaptic delays based on learning automata in an RBF-l
I for data clustering
S
NEUROCOMPUTING
O
A In this paper, a new delay shift approach for learning in an RBF-like neural
B neurons is introduced. The synaptic connections between the input and the R
connections and the delays are adapted during an unsupervised learning proc
in this network is modeled by a learning automaton. The action of the auto
connection is considered as the delay of the corresponding synaptic connec
simulations that the clustering precision of the proposed network is conside
existing similar neural networks. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserv
C BOHTE SM, 2000, P IEEE INNS ENNS INT, P279
R BOHTE SM, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V48, P17
CHOE Y, 1998, NEUROCOMPUTING, V21, P139
EURICH CW, 1999, PHYS REV LETT, V82, P1594
EURICH CW, 2000, NEUROCOMPUTING, V32, P741
GERSTNER W, 1998, PULSED NEURAL NETWOR, P3
HINTON GE, 2000, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V12
HOPFIELD JJ, 1995, NATURE, V376, P33
KOHONEN T, 2001, SELFORGANIZING MAPS
MAASS W, 1997, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V8, P355
MAASS W, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P1659
MAASS W, 1999, PULSED NEURAL NETWOR, P55
MURPHY PM, 2004, UCI REPOSITORY MACHI
NARENDRA KS, 1989, LEARNING AUTOMATA IN
NATSCHLAGER T, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P319
OKEEFE J, 1993, HIPPOCAMPUS, V3, P317
PERRETT DI, 1982, EXP BRAIN RES, V47, P329
RUF B, 1998, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V9, P575
RUF B, 1998, THESIS TU GRAZ AUSTR
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
THORPE SJ, 1989, CONNECTIONISM PERSPE, P63
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1981, 812 MAX PLANCK I DEP
N
22
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
MAR
2005
64
335
357
ISI:000227922700020
P
J
T
A Aviel, Y
U Horn, D
Abeles, M
T
Memory capacity of balanced networks
I
S
NEURAL COMPUTATION
O
A We study the problem of memory capacity in balanced networks of spiking neur
B represented by either synfire chains ( SFC) or Hebbian cell assemblies ( H
these balanced networks by a proper choice of the architecture of the netw
in an SFC or of an HCA is limited from below and from above by dynamical c
of w(E) by rootK, where K is the total excitatory synaptic connectivity, a
description of our system for any given K. Using combinatorial arguments, we d
capacity. The capacity allowed by the dynamics of the system, alpha(C), is
HCA, we obtain alpha(C) of order 0.1, and for SFC, we find values of order
The capacity can be improved by introducing shadow patterns, inhibitory ce
the excitatory assemblies in both memory models. This leads to a doubly balanc
to the usual global balancing of excitation and inhibition, there exists specif
of both types of assemblies on the background activity of the network. For
for each network architecture, we obtain an allowed region ( phase space) for
is viable.
C ABELES M, 1982, LOCAL CORTICAL CIRCU
R ABELES M, 1991, CORTICONICS
AMIT DJ, 1985, PHYS REV LETT, V55, P1530
AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
AMIT DJ, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P237
AVIEL Y, 2003, ADV INFORMATION PROC, V15
AVIEL Y, 2003, NEURAL COMPUT, V15, P1321
AVIEL Y, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V58, P123
BIENENSTOCK E, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P179
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, THEORETICAL APPROACH
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
BRUNEL N, 2000, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V8, P183
BRUNEL N, 2001, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V11, P63
COMPTE A, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P910
DIESMANN M, 1995, SYNOD ENV NEURAL SYS
DIESMANN M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P529
FUNAHASHI S, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V61, P331
GERSTEIN GL, 1964, BIOPHYS J, V4, P41
GERSTNER W, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P139
HANSEL D, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P307
HAYON G, 2002, MODELING COMPOSITION
HEBB DO, 1949, ORGANIZATION BEHAV
HERRMANN M, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P403
HERTZ JA, 1999, NEURONAL INFORMATION
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P510
HUANG EP, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V78, P2870
IZHIKEVICH EM, 2004, CEREB CORTEX, V14, P933
LERCHNER A, 2004, NEUROCOMPUTING, V58, P935
LEVY N, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P815
MEHRING C, 2003, BIOL CYBERN, V88, P395
MILLER R, 1996, BIOL CYBERN, V75, P253
MIYASHITA Y, 1988, NATURE, V331, P68
MORRISON A, 2004, UNPUB ADV BOUNDARIES
SHADLEN MN, 1994, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V4, P569
SOMMER FT, 2000, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V94, P473
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
TETZLAFF T, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V52, P949
TREVES A, 1990, PHYS REV A, V42, P2418
TSODYKS MV, 1988, EUROPHYS LETT, V6, P101
TUCKWELL HC, 1988, INTRO THEORETICAL NE
VANVREESWIJK C, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1321
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
WANG XJ, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P9587
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
45
MAR
2005
17
3
B
691
P
E
713
P
U
ISI:000226909800008
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Holmes, DJ
Meese, TS
Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool
JOURNAL OF VISION
In human vision, the response to luminance contrast at each small region i
a more global process where suppressive signals are pooled over spatial fre
But what rules govern summation among stimulus components within the suppre
question by extending a pedestal plus pattern mask paradigm to use a stimu
components: a vertical 1 c/deg pedestal, plus pattern masks made from eith
-45degrees) or a plaid (orientation = +/-45degrees), with component spatial fr
contrast of both types of pattern mask was fixed at 20% (i.e., plaid compo
found that both of these masks transformed conventional dipper functions (th
with no pattern mask) in exactly the same way: The dipper region was raised
the dipper handles superimposed. This equivalence of the two pattern masks ind
between the plaid components was perfectly linear prior to the masking sta
masks did not drive the detecting mechanism above its detection threshold
facilitation by the pedestal (Foley, 1994). Therefore, the pattern masking
within-channel masking, suggesting that linear summation of contrast signa
suppressive contrast gain pool. We present a quantitative model of the effect
for neurophysiological models of the process.
C ALBRECHT DG, 1991, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V7, P531
R BIRD CM, 2002, J OPT SOC AM A, V19, P1267
BONDS AB, 1991, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V6, P239
BOYNTON GM, 1999, VISION RES, V39, P1641
CANNON MW, 1991, VISION RES, V31, P1985
CANNON MW, 1995, VISION MODELS TARGET
CARANDINI M, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P10053
CHEN CC, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P773
CHEN CC, 2001, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V268, P509
CHEN CC, 2002, J VISION, V2, P520
CHEN CC, 2004, VISION RES, V44, P915
DZMURA M, 1996, J OPT SOC AM A, V13, P2135
ELLEMBERG D, 1998, J OPT SOC AM A, V15, P1733
FISER J, 2003, VISION RES, V43, P2637
FOLEY JM, 1994, J OPT SOC AM A, V11, P1710
FREEMAN TCB, 2002, NEURON, V35, P759
GEORGESON MA, 1987, VISION RES, V27, P765
GEORGESON MA, 1988, VISION RES, V28, P1193
GEORGESON MA, 1994, VISION RES, V34, P1061
GEORGESON MA, 2004, PERCEPTION, V33, P754
GOREA A, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V14, P897
GOREA A, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P707
GRAHAM NVS, 1989, VISUAL PATTERN ANAL
HEEGER DJ, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P181
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HOLMES DJ, 2001, PERCEPTION S, V30, P81
ITTI L, 2000, J OPT SOC AM A, V17, P1899
KONTSEVICH LI, 1999, J OPT SOC AM A, V16, P217
KONTSEVICH LL, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P707
KONTSEVICH LL, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1771
LEGGE GE, 1980, J OPT SOC AM, V70, P1458
LEGGE GE, 1984, VISION RES, V24, P373
MCKEE SP, 1985, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V37, P286
MEESE TS, 1996, VISION RES, V36, P1421
MEESE TS, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P2101
MEESE TS, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1113
MEESE TS, 2003, PERCEPTION, V32, P388
MEESE TS, 2004, J VISION, V4
MEESE TS, 2004, J VISION, V4, P930
MEESE TS, 2004, PERCEPTION S, V33, P41
MEIER L, 2002, J VISION, V2, P293
MORRONE MC, 1982, P R SOC B, V216, P335
MORRONE MC, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V67, P635
MORTENSEN U, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P2371
MORTENSEN U, 2003, VISION RES, V43, P855
MULLEN KT, 1994, J OPT SOC AM A, V11, P3136
NACHMIAS J, 1974, VISION RES, V14, P1039
OHZAWA I, 1985, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V54, P651
OLZAK LA, 1999, VISION RES, V39, P231
OLZAK LA, 2003, VISION RES, V43, P1433
PHILLIPS GC, 1984, J OPT SOC AM A, V1, P226
PRESS WH, 1989, NUMERICAL RECIPES PA
RAINVILLE SJM, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1727
ROSS J, 1991, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V246, P61
ROSS J, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P2051
SNOWDEN RJ, 1998, VISION RES, V38, P1935
SOLOMON JA, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P2671
SOLOMON SG, 2004, NEURON, V42, P155
THOMAS JP, 1997, J OPT SOC AM A, V14, P2392
TYLER CW, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P3121
WATSON AB, 1997, J OPT SOC AM A, V14, P2379
WETHERILL GB, 1965, BRITISH J MATHEMATIC, V18, P1
WILSON HR, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V38, P171
XING J, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P3065
YU C, 2001, J VISION, V1, P18
ZENGER B, 1996, VISION RES, V36, P2497
ZENGERLANDOLT B, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P6884
N
R
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
67
2004
4
12
1080
1089
ISI:000227037300007
P
J
T
A Marino, J
U Schummers, J
Lyon, DC
Schwabe, L
Beck, O
Wiesing, P
Obermayer, K
Sur, M
T
Invariant computations in local cortical networks with balanced excitation
I
S
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
O
A Cortical computations critically involve local neuronal circuits. The comp
B across a cortical area yet are carried out by networks that can vary widel
its functional architecture. Here we demonstrate a mechanism by which orient
invariantly in cat primary visual cortex across an orientation preference map
of local circuits. Visually evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conduct
in cortical neurons and thus keep the spike response sharply tuned at all m
balance derives from spatially isotropic local connectivity of both excita
Modeling results demonstrate that such covariation is a signature of recur
feed-forward processing and that the observed isotropic local circuit is suf
spike tuning.
C ANDERSON JS, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P909
R ANGELUCCI A, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P8633
AZOUZ R, 2003, NEURON, V37, P513
BENYISHAI R, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P3844
BONHOEFFER T, 1991, NATURE, V353, P429
BORGGRAHAM LJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P369
BOSKING WH, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P2112
CARANDINI M, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P470
CROOK JM, 1997, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V14, P141
DAS A, 1999, NATURE, V399, P655
DESAI NS, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P783
DESTEXHE A, 2001, NEUROSCIENCE, V107, P13
DRAGOI V, 2001, NATURE, V411, P80
DRAGOI V, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P883
DRAGOI V, 2003, VISUAL NEUROSCIENCES, P1654
FAGIOLINI M, 2003, EXCITATORY INHIBITOR, P269
FERSTER D, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P441
HIRSCH JA, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P335
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
KISVARDAY ZF, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P605
LAMPL I, 2001, NEURON, V30, P263
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
LIU GS, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P373
MALDONADO PE, 1997, SCIENCE, V276, P1551
MARTIN KAC, 2002, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V12, P418
MARTINEZ LM, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P321
MAZER JA, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P1645
MCLAUGHLIN D, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P87
MONIER C, 2003, NEURON, V37, P663
MOOSER F, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P872
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1998, PERCEPTUAL NEUROSCIE
NELSON S, 1994, SCIENCE, V265, P774
REID RC, 1995, NATURE, V378, P281
RINGACH DL, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P1018
ROERIG B, 2002, CEREB CORTEX, V12, P187
SCHULTE FJ, 1969, NEUROPADIATRIE, V1, P36
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SHARON D, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P512
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
SUAREZ H, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P6700
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
TURRIGIANO GG, 2004, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V5, P97
VOLGUSHEV M, 2000, EUR J NEUROSCI, V12, P257
VOLGUSHEV M, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V17, P1768
WEHR M, 2003, NATURE, V426, P442
WIELAARD DJ, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P5203
WILLIAMS SR, 2004, NAT NEUROSCI, V7, P961
YAO HS, 2001, NEURON, V32, P315
YOUSEF T, 2001, NEUROREPORT, V12, P1693
ZHANG LI, 2003, NATURE, V424, P201
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
50
FEB
2005
8
2
194
201
ISI:000226638200019
P
J
T
A Whitcher, B
U Schwarz, AJ
Barjat, H
Smart, SC
Grundy, RI
James, MF
T Wavelet-based cluster analysis: data-driven grouping of voxel time courses
I perfusion-weighted and pharmacological MRI of the rat brain
S
NEUROIMAGE
O
A MRI time series experiments produce a wealth of information contained in tw
B that evolve over time. Such experiments can, for example, localize brain r
stimuli, but frequently the spatiotemporal characteristics of the cerebral
and variable, and thus difficult to evaluate using hypothesis-based methods
in the temporal dimension to group voxels with similar time courses based on a n
transform (DWT) representation of each time course. Applying the DWT to each
information into coefficients associated with both time and scale. Discardi
associated with high-frequency oscillations (noise) provided a straight-fo
decreased the computational burden. Optimization-based clustering was then ap
coefficients in order to produce a finite number of voxel clusters. This w
(WCA) was evaluated using two representative classes of MRI neuroimaging exper
MRI, following occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCAO), WCA differe
different regions within the ischemic hemisphere. Following an acute cocaine c
differences in the pharmacokinetic profile of the cerebral response. We concl
method for blind analysis of time series image data. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc
C BAUDELET C, 2003, MAGNET RESON MED, V49, P985
R BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P845
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEALE EML, 1969, P 37 SESS LOND VOORB, V2, P92
BLOOM AS, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P235
CALHOUN VD, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1080
CALHOUN VD, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V48, P180
CALINSKI T, 1974, COMMUN STAT, V3, P1
CARANO RAD, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P842
CHEN YCI, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V38, P389
DAUBECHIES I, 1992, 10 LECT WAV, V61
DONOHO DL, 1994, BIOMETRIKA, V81, P425
DONOHO DL, 1995, J AM STAT ASSOC, V90, P1200
EVERITT BS, 2001, CLUSTER ANAL
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FRIMAN O, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P454
GENCAY R, 2001, INTRO WAVELETS OTHER
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HARTIGAN JA, 1979, APPL STATIST, V28, P100
HOEHN M, 2001, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V14, P491
HOUSTON GC, 2001, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V19, P905
HYVARINEN A, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P626
IRELAND MD, 2003, 39017 SOC NEUR WASH
KHERIF F, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P1068
KIVINIEMI V, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V18, P253
LANGE N, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P2401
LONGA EZ, 1989, STROKE, V20, P84
LUO F, 2003, MAGNET RESON MED, V49, P264
LUO WL, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V19, P1014
MALLAT S, 1998, WAVELET TOUR SIGNAL
MANDEVILLE JB, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P615
MAROTA JJA, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P13
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MOSER E, 1999, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V10, P166
NETSIRI C, 2003, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V21, P1097
PERCIVAL DB, 2000, WAVELET METHODS TIME
PETERSSON KM, 1999, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V354, P1239
PREECE M, 2001, BRAIN RES, V916, P107
RABEHESKETH S, 1997, STAT METHODS MED RES, V6, P215
REESE T, 2000, NMR BIOMED, V13, P43
RIPLEY B, 1996, PATTERN RECOGNITION
RITSCHEL WA, 1999, HDB BASIC PHARMACOKI
ROSEN BR, 1990, MAGNET RESON MED, V14, P249
SOMORJAI RL, 2002, ARTIF INTELL MED, V25, P5
SUGAR CA, 2003, J AM STAT ASSOC, V98, P750
XI ZX, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V48, P838
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
46
JAN 15
2005
24
2
281
295
ISI:000226454500002
J
Goelman, G
Radial correlation contrast - A functional connectivity MRI contrast to ma
communication
NEUROIMAGE
A functional connectivity MRI method that groups neigbboring voxels in relati
cross-correlation between their time courses is presented. This grouping ge
is assumed to provide insights into the local organization of neuronal act
spatial resolution fMRI rat data subjected to electric forepaw sensory stim
mu(1)) shows a significant localized increase of the vector field amplitude
of the primary sensory cortex and in layer 2/3 of the primary motor cortex, su
with local neuronal communication. Vector field phases exhibit a transition
random-like orientations during rest to clusters of common orientations. Clus
dependent on the radii of the vector field calculation, and shuffling voxe
generates a random-like vector orientation instead. This suggests that chang
activation represent changes in the internal correlation between voxels th
in the internal neuronal communication. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights
C ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
R BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BISWAL B, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P537
BISWAL BB, 1997, NMR BIOMED, V10, P165
BISWAL BB, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P265
BUCHEL C, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P768
CORDES D, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1636
CORDES D, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1326
CORDES D, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P305
EMILIO S, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P539
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FLETCHER P, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P337
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P153
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GRAY CM, 1999, NEURON, V24, P31
HEEGER DJ, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P631
KRUGER G, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P631
LI SJ, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V43, P45
LOGOTHETIS NK, 2001, NATURE, V412, P150
LOWE MJ, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P119
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
SEIDEMANN E, 1998, NATURE, V394, P72
SHADLEN MN, 1999, NEURON, V24, P67
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
23
DEC
2004
23
4
1432
1439
ISI:000226041800019
J
Thirion, B
Faugeras, O
Feature characterization in fMRI data: the Information Bottleneck approach
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
O
A Clustering is a well-known technique for the analysis of Functional Magnetic R
B whose main advantage is certainly flexibility: given a metric on the datas
characteristics of the data. But intrinsic to this approach are also the p
the quantization accuracy, and the number of clusters necessary to describ
Bottleneck (IB) approach to vector quantization, proposed by Bialek and Ti
difficulties: (1) it deals with an explicit trade-off between quantization a
so during the clustering procedure and not post hoc: (3) it takes into acc
distribution of the features within the feature space and not only their m
principled through an information theoretic formulation, which is relevant
paper, we present how to benefit from this method to analyze fMRI data. Our
of voxels according to the magnitude of their responses to several experim
quantization provides a consistent representation of the data, allowing fo
comparison of datasets. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C BALSLEV D, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V15, P135
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEZDEK JC, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
COVER TM, 1991, ELEMENTS INFORMATION
FADILI MJ, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P160
FADILI MJ, 2001, MED IMAGE ANAL, V5, P55
FLANDIN G, 2003, P 9 OHBM NEUR, V19
FRISON L, 1992, STAT MED, V11, P1685
FRISTON KJ, 1997, 5PM97 COURSE NOTES
FRISTON KJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P196
GATH I, 1989, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V11, P773
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
GUSTAFSON DE, 1979, P IEEE CDC SAN DIEG, P761
ICHIHASHI H, 2000, AFSS 2000
ICHIHASHI H, 2001, 10 IEEE INT C FUZZ S
JARMASZ M, 2003, CONCEPTS MAGN RESO A, V16, P50
MOLLER U, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P431
PENNY W, 2003, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V22, P504
PEUSKENS H, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2451
STILL S, 2003, NIPS 2003
THIRION B, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V2878, P831
TISHBY N, 1999, P 37 ANN ALL C COMM, P368
WISMULLER A, 2002, INT J COMPUT VISION, V46, P103
WOOLRICH MW, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1370
N
28
R
P
DEC
D
P 2004
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
8
4
403
419
ISI:000225930500001
P
J
T
A Panzeri, S
U Petroni, F
Bracci, E
T
Exploring structure-function relationships in neocortical networks by means
I
S
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
O
A Determining the neuronal architecture underlying certain visual functions
B for understanding how sensory processing is implemented in the brain. The
physiological and biophysical data that is being currently acquired on the
constrain its functional architecture. However, given the intrinsic complex
it is difficult to provide a comprehensive framework to use these data in
structure-function relationships. Here, we discuss the use of biophysically
of neuronal networks, constructed to reflect the known properties of neoco
modularity, as a tool to bring together anatomy and physiology. We illustr
of the neuro-dynamics modelling approach by considering recent studies on
functional structure of the visual cortex and its response timing, and on th
of neuronal oscillations in the gamma frequency range. We also critically disc
theory and experiments could help this approach to become directly relevan
(C) 2004 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C BAIR W, 1999, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V9, P447
R BATTAGLIA FP, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P431
BRACCI E, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P8104
BULLIER J, 1995, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V5, P497
CALLAWAY EM, 1998, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V21, P47
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FERRERA VP, 1992, NATURE, V358, P756
HILGETAG CC, 1996, SCIENCE, V271, P776
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
JEFFERYS JGR, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P202
KOCH C, 1999, BIOPHYSICS COMPUTATI
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
LAMME VAF, 2000, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V23, P571
LIU SC, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P629
MARTIN KAC, 2002, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V12, P418
NEALEY TA, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P2069
ORAM MW, 1994, NEURAL NETWORKS, V7, P945
PANZERI S, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P1553
PANZERI S, 2001, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V12, P423
PANZERI S, 2001, NEURON, V29, P769
PETRONI F, 2001, NEUROREPORT, V12, P2753
ROCKLAND KS, 1979, BRAIN RES, V179, P3
ROLLS ET, 1998, NEURAL NETOWRKS BRAI
ROLLS ET, 1999, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V11, P300
SCHENDAN HE, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P111
SCHMOLESKY MT, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P3272
SHANNON CE, 1949, MATH THEORY INFORMAT
SHARON D, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P512
SINGER W, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V929, P123
SOMMER MA, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V80, P3331
STALEY KJ, 1995, SCIENCE, V269, P977
THORPE S, 1996, NATURE, V381, P520
THORPE SJ, 1989, CONNECTIONISM PERSPE, P63
TRAUB RD, 1985, NEUROSCIENCE, V14, P1033
TRAUB RD, 1996, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V493, P471
TRAUB RD, 1996, NATURE, V383, P621
WHITTINGTON MA, 1995, NATURE, V373, P612
WHITTINGTON MA, 1997, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V502, P591
WHITTINGTON MA, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P1727
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
40
NOV
2004
26
9
699
710
ISI:000225749600002
R
P
J
T
A Furber, SB
U Bainbridge, WJ
Cumpstey, JM
Temple, S
T
Sparse distributed memory using N-of-M codes
I
S
NEURAL NETWORKS
O
A An analysis is presented of a sparse distributed memory (SDM) inspired by that
B P. (1988). Sparse distributed memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press] but modified t
based on spiking neurons. The memory presented here employs sparse binary
synaptic weights and a simple Hebbian learning rule. It is a two-layer net
being similar to the `address decoder' in Jaeckel's [Jaeckel, L.A. (1989). A
distributed memory. RIACS Technical Report 89.30, NASA Ames Research Centr
Kanerva's SDM and the second (writeable) 'data store' layer being a correl
proposed by Willshaw et al. [Willshaw, D. J., Buneman, O.P., & Longuet-Higgins
associative memory. Nature, 222, 960-962]. The resulting network is shown to
and is scalable. The analysis is supported by numerical simulations and gi
configuration of the memory to be optinused for a range of noiseless and noisy e
Ltd. All rights reserved.
C ALEKSANDER I, 1979, IEE P E, V2, P29
R AUSTIN J, 1987, IMAGE VISION COMPUT, V5, P251
AUSTIN J, 1995, HDB NEURAL COMPUTATI
CASASENT D, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P687
DAVIDSON S, 1999, THESIS U SHEFFIELD U
FELLER W, 1950, INTRO PROBABILITY TH, V1, P33
FLYNN MJ, 1988, CSLTR87338 STANF U
JAECKEL LA, 1989, 8930 NASA AM RES CTR
KANERVA P, 1988, SPARSE DISTRIBUTED M
KOHONEN T, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P353
KRISTOFERSON J, 2001, FDN REAL WORLD INTEL, P283
LOMAS D, 1996, THESIS U YORK UK
MAASS W, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P2519
MARR D, 1969, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V202, P437
NADAL JP, 1990, NETWORK, V1, P61
PALM G, 1996, MODELS NEURAL NETWOR, V3
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
THORPE S, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P715
TURNER M, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P1637
VERHOEFF T, 1998, DISTRIB COMPUT, V3, P1
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N 21
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
DEC
2004
17
10
1437
1451
ISI:000225417800005
J
Sporns, O
Kotter, R
Motifs in brain networks
PLOS BIOLOGY
Complex brains have evolved a highly efficient network architecture whose stru
of generating a large repertoire of functional states. We detect character
( structural and functional motifs) in neuroanatomical data sets and ident
motifs that occur in significantly increased numbers. Our analysis suggest
networks maximize both the number and the diversity of functional motifs, whil
motifs remains small. Using functional motif number as a cost function in
obtain network topologies that resemble real brain networks across a broad spe
including small-world attributes. These results are consistent with the hy
neural architectures are organized to maximize functional repertoires and
integration of information.
C ALBERT R, 2002, REV MOD PHYS, V74, P47
R ARTZYRANDRUP Y, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P1107
BRESSLER SL, 1995, BRAIN RES REV, V20, P288
BRESSLER SL, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P26
BROVELLI A, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P9849
BUCHEL C, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P871
BURNS GAPC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P55
BUTLER AB, 1996, COMP VERTEBRATE NEUR
CHANGIZI MA, 2003, J THEOR BIOL, V220, P157
CHERNIAK C, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P2418
CHKLOVSKII DB, 2002, NEURON, V34, P341
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FRISTON K, 2002, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V25, P221
HARARY F, 1973, GRAPHICAL ENUMERATIO, P124
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P91
JERISON HJ, 1973, EVOLUTION BRAIN INTE
KAAS JH, 2000, BRAIN MIND, V1, P7
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KOTTER R, 2003, NEURAL NETWORKS, V16, P1261
KRUBITZER L, 2000, EVOLUTIONARY DEV BIO, P206
LAUGHLIN SB, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P1870
MASLOV S, 2002, SCIENCE, V296, P910
MCINTOSH AR, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P1531
MCINTOSH AR, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P861
MCINTOSH AR, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P6520
MILO R, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P824
MILO R, 2004, SCIENCE, V303, P1538
MILO R, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P1107
PASSINGHAM RE, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P606
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P277
SPORNS O, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P127
SPORNS O, 2002, COMPLEXITY, V7, P28
SPORNS O, 2002, NEUROSCIENCE DATABAS, P171
SPORNS O, 2004, COORDINATION DYNAMIC, P197
SPORNS O, 2004, NEUROINFORMATICS, V2, P145
SPORNS O, 2004, TRENDS COGN SCI, V8, P418
STEPHAN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P111
STROGATZ SH, 2001, NATURE, V410, P268
TONONI G, 1994, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V91, P5033
TONONI G, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P474
TONONI G, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P3257
TONONI G, 2003, BMC NEUROSCI, V4
VARELA F, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P229
WALTER WG, 1953, LIVING BRAIN
WATTS DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440
WATTS DJ, 1999, SMALL WORLDS
WHITE JG, 1986, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V314, P1
YOUNG MP, 1993, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V252, P13
ZEKI SM, 1978, NATURE, V274, P423
ZHIGULIN VP, 2003, DYNAMICAL MOTIFS BUI
N
51
R
P
NOV
D
P
2004
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
A
R
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
2
11
1910
1918
e369
ISI:000225160300021
J
Meese, TS
Hess, RF
Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, ori
eye of origin
JOURNAL OF VISION
Masking is said to occur when a mask stimulus interferes with the visibility
One widely held view of this process supposes interactions between mask and t
masking), and explicit models (e.g., J. M. Foley, 1994) have proposed that the
Unlike a within-channel model, where masking involves the combination of m
a single mechanism, this cross-channel inhibitory model predicts that the
perceived contrast of a test stimulus. Another possibility is that masking i
in which case, perception of contrast should be unaffected once the signal
We use circular patches and annuli of sine-wave grating in contrast detect
experiments to test these hypotheses and investigate interactions across sp
field position, and eye of origin. In both types of experiments we found s
that can occur over a factor of 3 in spatial frequency, 45 in orientation, acr
and between different eyes. We found the effects to be greatest at the low
used (0.46 c/deg), and when the mask and test differed in all four dimensi
surprising in light of previous work where it was concluded that suppression
monocular (C. Chubb, G. Sperling, & J. A. Solomon, 1989). The results confirm t
cross-channel masking involves contrast suppression and not (purely) mask-in
cross-channel masking can be a powerful phenomenon, particularly at low test
mask and test are presented to different eyes.
C ALBRECHT DG, 1991, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V7, P531
R BISHOP PO, 1973, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V231, P31
BLAKE R, 1989, PSYCHOL REV, V96, P145
BONDS AB, 1989, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V2, P41
BRUCE V, 2003, VISUAL PERCEPTION PH
BURR D, 1981, EXP BRAIN RES, V43, P455
BURR DC, 1987, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V389, P1
CAMPBELL FW, 1966, J PHYSL, V187, P437
CANNON MW, 1991, VISION RES, V31, P1985
CANNON MW, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P1685
CANNON MW, 1996, VISION RES, V36, P1115
CARANDINI M, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P10053
CARPENTER RHS, 1973, EXPL BRAIN RES, V18, P287
CHEN CC, 2002, J VISION, V2, P520
CHEN CC, 2004, VISION RES, V44, P915
CHUBB C, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P9631
CORNSWEET TN, 1962, AM J PSYCHOL, V75, P485
DAUGMAN JG, 1984, VISION RES, V24, P891
DEANGELIS GC, 1992, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V68, P144
DEVALOIS RL, 1990, SPATIAL VISION
DORAIS A, 1997, VISION RES, V37, P1725
DZMURA M, 1996, J OPT SOC AM A, V13, P2135
EJIMA Y, 1985, VISION RES, V25, P1223
ELLEMBERG D, 1998, J OPT SOC AM A, V15, P1733
FINNEY DJ, 1971, PROBIT ANAL
FOLEY JM, 1994, J OPT SOC AM A, V11, P1710
FOLEY JM, 1997, VISION RES, V37, P2779
FREEMAN TCB, 2002, NEURON, V35, P759
GEORGESON M, 1976, NATURE, V259, P413
GEORGESON MA, 1980, PERCEPTION, V9, P503
GEORGESON MA, 1980, PERCEPTION, V9, P695
GEORGESON MA, 1985, SPATIAL VISION, V1, P103
GEORGESON MA, 1991, J OPT SOC AM A, V3, P579
GEORGESON MA, 1997, VISION RES, V37, P3255
GEORGESON MA, 1998, IMAGE VISION COMPUT, V16, P389
GEORGESON MA, 2004, PERCEPTION, V33, P754
GOREA A, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V14, P897
GOREA A, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P707
GRAHAM N, 1989, VISUAL PATTERN ANAL
GREENLEE MW, 1988, VISION RES, V28, P1303
HARRAD RA, 1992, VISION RES, V32, P2135
HARRIS JM, 2001, VISION RES, V41, P873
HARVEY LO, 1990, J OPT SOC AM A, V7, P116
HEEGER DJ, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P181
HESS RF, 1983, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V217, P309
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HOLMES DJ, IN PRESS J VISION
HOLMES DJ, 2001, PERCEPTION S, V30, P81
ITTI L, 2000, J OPT SOC AM A, V17, P1899
KLEIN S, 1974, VISION RES, V14, P1421
KONTSEVICH LL, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P707
KONTSEVICH LL, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1771
KOVACS I, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P15508
LEE DK, 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P375
LEE SH, 2004, VISION RES, V44, P983
LEGGE GE, 1979, J OPT SOC AM, V69, P838
LEGGE GE, 1980, J OPT SOC AM, V70, P1458
LEGGE GE, 1984, VISION RES, V24, P385
LEHKY SR, 1988, PERCEPTION, V17, P215
LEVI DM, 1979, SCIENCE, V206, P852
MAGNUSSEN S, 1980, SCIENCE, V207, P908
MAGNUSSEN S, 1980, VISION RES, V20, P39
MCKEE SP, 1985, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V37, P286
MCKEE SP, 1994, VISION RES, V34, P1047
MEESE TS, IN PRESS J VISION
MEESE TS, IN PRESS PSYCHOL RES, V34
MEESE TS, IN PRESS VISION RES
MEESE TS, 1995, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V57, P267
MEESE TS, 2002, VISION RES, V42, P1113
MEESE TS, 2003, ANN GEN M APPL VIS A
MEESE TS, 2003, PERCEPTION, V32, P388
MEESE TS, 2004, PERCEPTION S, V33, P41
MORRONE MC, 1982, P R SOC B, V216, P335
MORRONE MC, 1986, NATURE, V321, P235
MORRONE MC, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V67, P635
MULLEN KT, 1994, J OPT SOC AM A, V11, P3136
OLZAK LA, 1981, J OPT SOC AM, V71, P64
OLZAK LA, 1985, J OPT SOC AM A, V2, P1551
OLZAK LA, 1986, VISION RES, V26, P1143
OLZAK LA, 1991, VISION RES, V31, P51
OLZAK LA, 1999, VISION RES, V39, P231
OLZAK LA, 1999, VISION RES, V39, P3983
PETROV AP, 1980, VISION RES, V31, P1337
PHILLIPS GC, 1984, J OPT SOC AM A, V1, P226
POLAT U, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P993
REGAN D, 2000, HUMAN PERCEPTION OBJ
ROSS J, 1991, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V246, P61
ROSS J, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P2051
SASAKI H, 2002, PERCEPTION, V31, P409
SENGPIEL F, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P6855
SENGPIEL F, 1995, VISION RES, V35, P179
SNOWDEN RJ, 1994, J OPT SOC AM A, V11, P25
SNOWDEN RJ, 1998, VISION RES, V38, P1935
SOLOMON JA, 1993, VISION RES, V33, P2671
THOMAS JP, 1989, J OPT SOC AM A, V6, P1102
THOMAS JP, 1997, J OPT SOC AM A, V14, P2392
TOLHURST DJ, 1975, VISION RES, V15, P967
TRUCHARD AM, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P3017
WALKER GA, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P227
WATSON AB, 1982, VISION RES, V22, P17
WESTENDORF DH, 1989, J EXP PSYCHOL, V15, P485
WETHERILL GB, 1965, BRITISH J MATHEMATIC, V18, P1
WILSON HR, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V38, P171
WILSON HR, 1983, VISION RES, V23, P873
WILSON HR, 1990, VISUAL PERCEPTION NE, P231
WOLFE JM, 1986, PSYCHOL REV, V93, P269
XING J, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P3065
XING J, 2001, VISION RES, V41, P571
YU C, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P724
YU C, 2001, J VISION, V1, P18
YU C, 2002, J VISION, V2, P243
YU C, 2003, J VISION, V3, P527
ZENGER B, 1996, VISION RES, V36, P2497
ZENGERLANDOLT B, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P6884
N
R
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
114
2004
4
10
843
859
ISI:000225157500002
P
J
T
A Bowman, FD
U Patel, R
Lu, CX
T
Methods for detecting functional classifications in neuroimaging data
I
S
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
O
A Data-driven statistical methods are useful for examining the spatial organiz
B Cluster analysis is one approach that aims to identify spatial classificatio
profiles. Numerous clustering algorithms are available, and no one method
application because an algorithm's performance depends on specific charact
and fuzzy clustering are popular for neuroimaging analyses, and select hierar
in the literature. It is unclear which clustering methods perform best for
a simulation study, based on PET neuroimaging data, to evaluate the perfor
algorithms, including a new procedure that builds on the kth nearest neighbor
stopping rules that assist in determining the optimal number of clusters.
algorithms perform best in our study, some of which are new to neuroimaging
beta-flexible methods exhibiting the strongest performances. Furthermore,
methods yield the best performances for noisy data, and the popular K-means an
also perform reasonably well. The stopping rules also exhibit good performanc
algorithms, and the pseudo-T-2 and pseudo-F stopping rules are superior fo
simulations for both noisy and unscaled PET neuroimaging data, we recommend th
or pseudo-T-2 stopping rule along with either Ward's or the beta-flexible c
Wiley-Liss, Inc.
C BALSLEV D, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V15, P135
R BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEZDEK JC, 1984, COMPUT GEOSCI, V10, P191
BOWMAN R, 2004, IN PRESS NEUROIMAGE
BRODMANN K, 1909, VERGLEICHENDE LOKALI
CALINSKI T, 1974, COMMUN STAT, V3, P1
CARLIN BP, 2000, BAYES EMPIRICAL BAYE, P40
CORDES D, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P305
DUDA RO, 1973, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI
FADILI MJ, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P160
FADILI MJ, 2001, MED IMAGE ANAL, V5, P55
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
LANCE GN, 1967, COMPUT J, V9, P373
LARSEN B, 1999, P 5 ACM SIGKDD INT C, P16
MACQUEEN J, 1967, P 5 BERK S MATH STAT, P281
MAITRA R, 1997, J COMPUT GRAPH STAT, V6, P132
MILLIGAN GW, 1985, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V50, P159
RENCHER A, 2002, METHODS MULTIVARIATE, P470
SARLE WS, 1983, A108 SAS I INC
SCHWARZ G, 1978, ANN STAT, V6, P461
SOMMER FT, 2003, EXPLORATORY ANAL DAT, P17
STANBERRY L, 2003, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V20, P201
WONG MA, 1983, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V45, P362
ZHU CZ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V18, P685
N
27
R
P
OCT
D
P
2004
Y
V
23
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
2
109
119
ISI:000224256500004
P
J
T
A Vezoli, J
U Falchier, A
Jouve, B
Knoblauch, K
Young, M
Kennedy, H
T
Quantitative analysis of connectivity in the visual cortex: Extracting fun
I
S
NEUROSCIENTIST
O
A It is generally agreed that information flow through the cortex is constra
B architecture. Lack of precise data on areal connectivity leads to indeterm
authors introduce two quantitative parameters (SLN and FLN) that hold the
indeterminacy. In the visual system, using a very incomplete database, provi
with the recent proposal of higher functions of area V1 and suggest a hitherto
of the frontal eye field.
C BARONE P, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P3263
R BATARDIERE A, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V396, P493
CRICK F, 1998, NATURE, V391, P245
DOMBROWSKI SM, 2001, CEREB CORTEX, V11, P975
FALCHIER A, 2000, EUR J NEUROSCI S, V12, P286
FALCHIER A, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P5749
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
HILGETAG CC, 1996, SCIENCE, V271, P776
HOCHSTEIN S, 2002, NEURON, V36, P791
HUBEL DH, 1974, J COMP NEUROL, V158, P295
JOUVE B, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P28
KENNEDY H, 1985, J NEUROSCI, V5, P2815
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
PASCUALLEONE A, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P510
PETRONI F, 2001, NEUROREPORT, V12, P2753
PINS D, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P461
RESS D, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P414
REYNOLDS JH, 2003, NEURON, V37, P853
ROCKLAND KS, 1979, BRAIN RES, V179, P3
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SUPER H, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P3407
THOMPSON KG, 1996, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V76, P4040
YOUNG MP, 1992, NATURE, V358, P152
YOUNG MP, 2000, SOC NEUR ABSTR, V26, P449
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
24
OCT
2004
10
5
476
482
ISI:000223950800015
J
Miyoshi, S
Okada, M
Storage capacity diverges with synaptic efficiency in an associative memory
pruning
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
It is known that storage capacity per synapse increases by synaptic pruning in
associative memory model. However, the storage capacity of the entire networ
this difficulty, we propose decreasing the connectivity while keeping the tot
by introducing delayed synapses. In this paper, a discrete synchronous-type mo
and their prunings is discussed as a concrete example of the proposal. Fir
theory by employing statistical neurodynamics. This theory involves macrod
dynamics of a network with serial delay elements. Next, considering the tr
explained equations, we rederive macroscopic steady-state equations of the
Fourier transformation. The storage capacities are analyzed quantitatively
synaptic prunings are treated analytically: random pruning and systematic pr
clear that in both prunings, the storage capacity increases as the length
connectivity of the synapses decreases when the total number of synapses i
interesting fact becomes clear: the storage capacity asymptotically approach
In contrast, the storage capacity diverges in proportion to the logarithm of th
pruning and the proportion constant is 4/pi. These results theoretically suppo
following an overgrowth of synapses in the brain and may suggest that the b
attractors such as sequences and limit cycles rather than equilibrium stat
C AMARI S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P63
R AMARI S, 1988, P IEEE ICNN 1988, P633
BOURGEOIS JP, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P2801
CHECHIK G, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1759
DAYAN P, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V65, P253
DURING A, 1998, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V31, P8607
ECKENHOFF MF, 1991, DEV BRAIN RES, V64, P129
FUKUSHIMA K, 1973, KYBERNETIK, V12, P58
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
HORN D, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1
HUTTENLOCHER PR, 1979, BRAIN RES, V163, P195
HUTTENLOCHER PR, 1982, NEUROSCI LETT, V33, P247
INNOCENTI GM, 1995, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V18, P397
KAWAMURA M, 2002, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V35, P253
MIMURA K, 2003, PHYS REV E 1, V68
MIYOSHI S, 1995, P IEEE INT C NEUR NE, P1955
MIYOSHI S, 2002, P 9 INT C NEUR INF P, V1, P70
MIYOSHI S, 2002, T IEICE J A, V85, P124
MIYOSHI S, 2004, NEURAL NETWORKS, V17, P53
OKADA M, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS, V8, P833
OKADA M, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1429
OKADA M, 1998, PHYS REV E B, V57, P2095
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1981, BIOL CYBERN, V39, P125
RAKIC P, 1994, PROG BRAIN RES, V102, P227
ROE AW, 1990, SCIENCE, V250, P818
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SHIINO M, 1992, J PHYS A, V25, L375
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1986, HEIDELBERG C GLASSY, P485
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1986, PHYS REV A, V34, P2571
STRYKER MP, 1986, J NEUROSCI, V6, P2117
TAKACS J, 1994, J NEUROSCI RES, V38, P515
WOLFF JR, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V66, P13
YANAI HF, 1993, DYNAMICS NEURAL NETS
N
34
R
P
SEP
D
P
2004
Y
V
15
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
5
1215
1227
ISI:000223798400026
S
Graham, BP
Dynamics of storage and recall in hippocampal associative memory networks
COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE: CORTICAL DYNAMICS
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
A major challenge to understanding cortical function is the complexity foun
microcircuit levels. This review covers theoretical studies aimed at elucidat
within hippocampal pyramidal cells. This processing involves both the intrin
as well as the microcircuit of inhibitory interneurons that synapse onto t
considered within the framework of associative memory function in areas CA
hippocampus.
C ABRAHAM WC, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P10924
R ANDRASFALVY BK, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P9151
ARADI I, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V538, P227
BARKAI E, 1994, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V72, P644
BI GQ, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P10464
BORGGRAHAM LJ, 1998, CEREBRAL CORTEX, V13
BUZSAKI G, 1989, NEUROSCIENCE, V31, P551
BUZSAKI G, 1995, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V5, P504
BUZSAKI G, 2002, NEURON, V33, P325
CASTELLANI GC, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P12772
COBB SR, 1995, NATURE, V378, P75
FELLOUS JM, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P771
FISAHN A, 1998, NATURE, V394, P186
FOLDY C, 2003, EURO J NEUROSCI, V19, P119
FRANSEN E, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P235
FREUND TF, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P347
FREUND TF, 2003, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V26, P489
GOLDBERG J, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P433
GRAHAM BP, 2001, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V12, P473
HARRIS KD, 2003, NATURE, V424, P552
HASSELMO ME, 1992, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V67, P1222
HASSELMO ME, 1992, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V67, P1230
HASSELMO ME, 1993, NEURAL COMPUT, V5, P32
HASSELMO ME, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P3898
HASSELMO ME, 1995, J NEUROSCI 2, V15, P5249
HASSELMO ME, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V86, P1792
HASSELMO ME, 2002, NEURAL COMPUT, V14, P793
HASSELMO ME, 2002, NEURAL NETWORKS, V15, P689
HOFFMAN DA, 1997, NATURE, V387, P869
HOFFMAN DA, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V81, P408
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HU H, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V545, P783
HUTCHEON B, 2000, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V23, P216
ISHIZUKA N, 1995, J COMP NEUROL, V362, P17
JENSEN O, 1996, LEARN MEMORY, V3, P243
JENSEN O, 1996, LEARN MEMORY, V3, P264
JENSEN O, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P2743
JOHNSTON D, 1996, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V19, P165
KALI S, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P7463
KARMARKAR UR, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V88, P507
KLAUSBERGER T, 2003, NATURE, V421, P844
KOPYSOVA IL, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7436
LEVY WB, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P579
LISMAN JE, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1512
LISMAN JE, 1999, NEURON, V22, P233
MACCAFERRI G, 2003, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V26, P564
MAGEE J, 1998, ANNU REV PHYSIOL, V60, P327
MAGEE JC, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7613
MAGEE JC, 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P508
MAGEE JC, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P895
MARR D, 1971, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V262, P23
MCBAIN CJ, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P11
MCNAUGHTON BL, 1987, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V10, P408
MELAMED O, 2004, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V27, P11
MENSCHIK ED, 1998, ARTIF INTELL MED, V13, P99
MIGLIORE M, 1996, BIOPHYS J, V71, P2394
MIGLIORE M, 1999, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V7, P5
MIGLIORE M, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P362
MIGLIORE M, 2003, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V14, P185
OKEEFE J, 1993, HIPPOCAMPUS, V3, P317
ORBAN G, 2001, BIOL CYBERN, V84, P123
PAULSEN O, 1998, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V21, P273
PIKE FG, 2000, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V529, P205
POIRAZI P, 2003, NEURON, V37, P977
POIRAZI P, 2003, NEURON, V37, P989
RASMUSSON DD, 2000, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V115, P205
REMONDES M, 2002, NATURE, V416, P736
SAMSONOVICH A, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P5900
SANTORO B, 2003, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V26, P550
SAUDARGIENE A, 2003, NEURAL COMP, V16
SHOUVAL HZ, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P10831
SOMMER FT, 2000, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V94, P473
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
SOURDET V, 1999, LEARN MEMORY, V6, P422
STUART G, 1997, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V20, P125
STUART GJ, 1994, NATURE, V367, P69
TRAUB RD, 1994, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V481, P79
TRAUB RD, 1995, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V2, P291
TRAUB RD, 1999, FAST OSCILLATIONS CO
TREVES A, 1994, HIPPOCAMPUS, V4, P374
TSODYKS M, 1999, HIPPOCAMPUS, V9, P481
WALLENSTEIN GV, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V78, P393
WANG XJ, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P6402
WILLSHAW DJ, 1990, NEURAL COMPUT, V2, P85
YUSTE R, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P653
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
85
2004
3146
1
23
ISI:000223462900001
J
Kotter, R
Online retrieval, processing, and visualization of primate connSectivity d
NEUROINFORMATICS
Connectivity is the key to understanding distributed and cooperative brain
comprehensive data on large-scale connectivity between primate brain areas
systematically from published reports of experimental tracing studies. Alth
have been made easily available for online retrieval, the multiplicity of
requirements of anatomical naming limit the intuitive access to the data.
can be improved by observing a small set of conventions in data representa
open up further opportunities for automated search and retrieval, for flexib
for interoperability with other databases. This article provides a discuss
image of the capabilities of the online interface to the CoCoMac database o
serve to point out sources of potential confusion and failure, and to demonstr
with other neuroinformatics resources that facilitate selection and process
example, for computational modelling and interpretation of functional imag
C AMUNTS K, 1999, J COMP NEUROL, V412, P319
R BACKHAUS K, 1996, MULTIVARIATE ANALYSE
BONBONIN G, 1947, NEOCORTEX MACACA MUL
BOWDEN DM, 2002, NEUROINFORMATICS, V1, P43
BRODMANN K, 1905, J PSYCHOL NEUROL LPZ, V4, P177
BRODMANN K, 1909, VERGLEICHENDE LOKALI
BUCHEL C, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P768
BURNS GAP, 1997, THESIS U OXFORD OXFO
BURNS GAPC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P55
BURNS GAPC, 2001, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V356, P1187
CANNON RC, 2003, NEUROINFORMATICS, V1, P3
CUSICK CG, 1995, J COMP NEUROL, V360, P513
DESIMONE R, 1986, J COMP NEUROL, V248, P164
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FRISCHKNECHT PM, 1995, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V2, P56
FRISTON KJ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V19, P1273
HACKETT TA, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V394, P475
KEMPER L, 2003, NEUROSCIENCE DATABAS, P155
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KOTTER R, 2001, ANAT EMBRYOL, V204, P333
KOTTER R, 2003, NEURAL NETWORKS, V16, P1261
LEERGAARD TB, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P8474
LEWIS JW, 2000, J COMP NEUROL, V428, P112
LEWIS JW, 2000, J COMP NEUROL, V428, P79
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V72, P1717
OLSZEWSKI J, 1952, THALAMUS MACACA MULA
PANDYA DN, 1982, J COMP NEUROL, V204, P196
PAXINOS G, 2000, RHESUS MONKEY BRAIN
ROCKLAND KS, 1994, CEREB CORTEX, V4, P300
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P277
STEPHAN KE, 1998, FORMAL APPROACH TRAN, P205
STEPHAN KE, 2001, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V356, P1159
STEPHEN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P37
VOGT BA, 1987, J COMP NEUROL, V262, P256
WALKER E, 1940, J COMP NEUROL, V98, P59
YOUNG MP, 1993, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V252, P13
N
37
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
SUM
2004
2
2
127
144
ISI:000223582200002
J
Jirsa, VK
Connectivity and dynamics of neural information processing
NEUROINFORMATICS
In this article, we systematically review the current literature on neural
equivalently, structure and function. In particular, we discuss how changes i
network affect the spatiotemporal network dynamics qualitively. The three
are, first, the local dynamics at the network nodes which includes fixed po
chaotic dynamics; second, the presence of time delays via propagation along co
the properties of the connectivity matrix such as its statistics, symmetry,
Since the connection topology changes when anatomical scales are traversed
network dynamics change. As a consequence different types of networks are en
of neural organization.
C ABELES M, 1991, CORTICONICS
R ALBERT R, 2002, REV MOD PHYS, V74, P47
AMARI SI, 1977, BIOL CYBERN, V27, P77
ARBIB MA, 2000, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V23, P513
ATAY FM, 2003, PHYS REV LETT, V91
BARABASI AL, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P509
BELAIR J, 1992, STABILITY DELAYED NE, V6, P1
BELAIR J, 1993, J DYNAM DIFF EQNS, V5, P607
BRAUER F, 1987, J DIFFER EQUATIONS, V69, P185
BRESSLER SL, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P26
BRESSLER SL, 2002, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V11, P58
BRESSLER SL, 2003, NEUROPSYCHPHARMACOLO, V28, P535
BRESSLOFF PC, 1996, PHYS REV LETT, V76, P4644
BRIATENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
CALVERT GA, 2001, CEREB CORTEX, V11, P1110
CAMPBELL SR, 1998, PHYSICA D, V111, P151
CHEN LN, 2002, IEEE T CIRCUITS-I, V49, P602
CHEN YH, 2003, PHYS REV E 2, V67
COHEN MA, 1983, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V13, P815
COOMBES S, 2003, PHYSICA D, V178, P219
CROSS MC, 1993, REV MOD PHYS, V65, P851
DEMONTE S, 2003, PHYS REV LETT, V90
EARL MG, 2003, PHYS REV E 2, V67
EGGERT J, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P1923
ERDOS P, 1959, PUBL MATH-DEBRECEN, V6, P290
ERLHAGEN W, 2002, PSYCHOL REV, V109, P545
ERMENTROUT B, 1998, REP PROG PHYS, V61, P353
FITZHUGH R, 1961, BIOPHYS J, V1, P445
FRANK TD, 1999, PHYSICA D, V127, P233
FRANK TD, 2000, PHYSICA D, V144, P62
FREEMAN WJ, 1975, MASS ACTION NERVOUS
FREEMAN WJ, 1992, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V2, P451
FUCHS A, 1992, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V2, P917
FUCHS A, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P375
GERSTNER W, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P43
GERSTNER W, 2002, SPIKING NEURON MODEL
GROSSBERG S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P17
HAKEN H, 1975, REV MOD PHYS, V47, P67
HENDREY M, 1999, PHYS REV LETT, V82, P859
HINDMARSH JL, 1984, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V221, P87
HODGKIN AL, 1952, J PHYSIOL, V117, P500
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPFIELD JJ, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P3088
HORWITZ B, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P829
HUBERMAN BA, 1998, SCIENCE, V280, P95
HUBERMAN BA, 1999, NATURE, V401, P131
JIRSA VK, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P27
JIRSA VK, 1995, PHYSICA D, V89, P100
JIRSA VK, 1996, PHYS REV LETT, V77, P960
JIRSA VK, 1997, PHYSICA D, V99, P503
JIRSA VK, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P2019
JIRSA VK, 2000, PHYS REV E B, V62, P8462
JIRSA VK, 2002, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V21, P493
JIRSA VK, 2002, NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, V5, P356
JIRSA VK, 2004, IN PRESS PHYS REV LE
JIRSA VK, 2004, INT J BIF CHAOS, V14
KANEKO K, 1997, PHYS REV LETT, V78, P2736
KELSO JAS, 1992, PHYS LETT A, V169, P134
KISS T, 2002, BIOSYSTEMS, V64, P119
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
LAGOFERNANDEZ LF, 2000, PHYS REV LETT, V84, P2758
LARGE EW, 2001, J NEW MUSIC RES, V22, P173
MACDONALD N, 1989, BIOL DELAY SYSTEMS L
MALLOT HA, 1989, MODELS BRAIN FUNCTIO, P175
MALLOT HA, 1996, BIOL CYBERN, V75, P441
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
NAGUMO J, 1962, P IRE, V50, P2061
NUNEZ PL, 1974, MATH BIOSCI, V21, P279
NUNEZ PL, 1995, NEOCORTICAL DYNAMICS
OTT E, 2002, PHYSICA D, V173, P29
PECORA LM, 1998, PHYS REV LETT, V80, P2109
REDDY DVR, 1999, PHYSICA D, V129, P15
ROBINSON PA, 1997, PHYS REV E B, V56, P826
ROBINSON PA, 2001, PHYS REV E 1, V63
SHAYER LP, 2000, SIAM J APPL MATH, V61, P673
SHEHADEH L, 2004, PATTERNS GENETIC INT
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SPORNS O, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P127
SPORNS O, 2002, COMPLEXITY, V7, P28
SPORNS O, 2004, COORDINATION DYNAMIC
STEYNROSS ML, 1999, PHYS REV E B, V60, P7299
TAGAMETS MA, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P310
VANDENDRIESSCHE P, 1998, SIAM J APPL MATH, V58, P1878
WATTS DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440
WILSON HR, 1972, BIOPHYS J, V12, P1
WILSON HR, 1973, KYBERNETIK, V13, P55
WRIGHT JJ, 1996, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V19, P285
ZHAO HY, 2003, PHYS REV E 1, V68
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
88
SUM
2004
2
2
183
204
ISI:000223582200007
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Bressler, SL
Inferential constraint sets in the organization of visual expectation
NEUROINFORMATICS
Many lines of evidence indicate that considering visual perception as a pa
feedforward decoding process is no longer tenable. Visual perception natura
of an integrated array of ongoing cognitive processes involving memory, pe
and motor control. In many situations, these processes allow expectations t
events. This article explores the idea that the formation of visual expect
organization of visual cortical areas, providing a framework of contextual inf
events are interpreted. Retinal inputs are treated as constraints that fee
interacting visual cortical areas and thalamic nuclei, which are concurrentl
another. Although the nature of expectational organization in the visual c
a reasonable hypothesis is that expectation involves the mutual constraint
patterns in multiple visual cortical areas. In this scenario, expectation
activity patterns in high-level visual cortical areas that impose constrai
on low-level areas according to the partial information that is available a
One approach to testing this proposal is through the analysis of simultane
potentials (LFPs) from local neuronal assemblies in multiple visual cortic
multivariate autoregressive modeling is showing promise in revealing the o
visual cortex.
C ARIELI A, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V73, P2072
R BACCALA LA, 2001, BIOL CYBERN, V84, P463
BARLOW H, 2001, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V12, P241
BARRIE JM, 1996, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V76, P520
BEKISZ M, 2003, EUR J NEUROSCI, V17, P421
BERNASCONI C, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P199
BRESSLER SL, 1987, BRAIN RES, V409, P285
BRESSLER SL, 1987, BRAIN RES, V409, P294
BRESSLER SL, 1993, NATURE, V366, P153
BRESSLER SL, 1996, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V76, P37
BRESSLER SL, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P625
BRESSLER SL, 1999, UNDERSTANDING REPRES, P121
BRESSLER SL, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P26
BRESSLER SL, 2002, CURR DIR PSYCHOL SCI, V11, P58
BRESSLER SL, 2003, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMA S1, V28, S35
BULLOCK TH, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P11568
CHIU CY, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P8906
COSSART R, 2003, NATURE, V423, P283
DESIMONE R, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P193
DING MZ, 2000, BIOL CYBERN, V83, P35
ENGEL AK, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P704
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FRANASZCZUK PJ, 1985, BIOL CYBERN, V51, P239
FREEMAN WJ, 1987, BRAIN RES, V422, P267
FREEMAN WJ, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P937
FRISTON K, 2002, PROG NEUROBIOL, V68, P113
FUSTER JM, 2000, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V35, P155
GALUSKE RAW, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P17083
GEWEKE J, 1982, J AM STAT ASSOC, V77, P304
GRANGER CWJ, 1969, ECONOMETRICA, V37, P424
HARRISON L, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V19, P1477
HESSE W, 2003, J NEUROSCI METH, V124, P27
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P91
HOUK JC, 1995, CEREB CORTEX, V5, P95
KASTNER S, 1999, NEURON, V22, P751
KERSTEN D, 2003, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V13, P150
LEE TS, 2000, PHYSIOL BEHAV, V77, P645
LEE TS, 2003, J OPT SOC AM A, V20, P1434
LEOPOLD DA, 2003, REV NEUROSCIENCE, V14, P195
MEADOR KJ, 2002, NEUROLOGY, V59, P847
MILLER R, 1996, BIOL CYBERN, V75, P253
MILTNER WHR, 1999, NATURE, V397, P434
MOLLER E, 2001, J NEUROSCI METH, V105, P143
MUMFORD D, 1992, BIOL CYBERN, V66, P241
MURRAY SO, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P15164
PASCUALLEONE A, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P510
PASSINGHAM RE, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P606
PHILLIPS WA, 1997, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V20, P657
PHILLIPS WA, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P95
POUGET A, 2003, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V26, P381
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P253
RAO RPN, 1999, VISION RES, V39, P1963
SINGER W, 1994, INT REV NEUROBIOL, V37, P153
SOMMER FT, 2003, THEOR BIOSCI, V122, P55
THAGARD P, 1998, COGNITIVE SCI, V22, P1
WARREN DJ, 2001, NEUROSCIENCE, V105, P19
YOUNG MP, 2000, SPATIAL VISION, V13, P137
YU AJ, 2002, NEURAL NETWORKS, V15, P719
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
58
SUM
2004
2
2
S
B
227
P
E
237
P
U
ISI:000223582200009
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Callaway, EM
Feedforward, feedback and inhibitory connections in primate visual cortex
NEURAL NETWORKS
Visual cortical circuits are organized at multiple levels of complexity inc
and columns, and specific cell types within these modules. Making sense of th
from anatomical observations requires linking these circuits to function a
complexity. Observations of these relationships have become increasingly s
several decades, beginning with correlations between the connectivities an
cortical areas and progressing toward cell type-specificity. These studies
about the functional interactions between cortical areas and modules and the
microcircuits influence interactions at more coarse levels of organization
rights reserved.
C AGMON A, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P319
R ALBRIGHT TD, 1984, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V52, P1106
BENEVENTO LA, 1982, BRAIN RES, V252, P161
BLASDEL GG, 1983, J NEUROSCI, V3, P1389
BLASDEL GG, 1984, J NEUROSCI, V4, P880
BRIGGS F, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P3600
CALLAWAY EM, 1996, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V13, P907
CALLAWAY EM, 1998, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V21, P47
CHATTERJEE S, 2003, NATURE, V426, P668
CRICK F, 1998, NATURE, V391, P245
DANTZKER JL, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P701
EDWARDS DP, 1995, VISION RES, V35, P1501
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FREUND TF, 1989, J COMP NEUROL, V289, P315
FRIES W, 1985, EXP BRAIN RES, V58, P613
GIBSON JR, 1999, NATURE, V402, P75
GONCHAR Y, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P683
GONCHAR Y, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10904
GUILLERY RW, 2002, NEURON, V33, P163
HENDRICKSON AE, 1978, J COMP NEUROL, V182, P123
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HUBEL DH, 1968, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V195, P215
HUBEL DH, 1972, J COMP NEUROL, V146, P421
KAWAGUCHI Y, 2002, J NEUROCYTOL 2, V31, P277
LACHICA EA, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P3566
LIVINGSTONE M, 1988, SCIENCE, V240, P740
LUND JS, 1975, J COMP NEUROL, V164, P287
MAUNSELL JHR, 1983, J NEUROSCI, V3, P2563
MESKENAITE V, 1997, J COMP NEUROL, V379, P113
PORTER JT, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2699
SALIN PA, 1995, PHYSIOL REV, V75, P107
SAWATARI A, 2000, NEURON, V25, P459
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SHERMAN SM, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P7121
SHIPP S, 2003, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V358, P1605
SOMOGYI P, 1998, BRAIN RES REV, V26, P113
SWADLOW HA, 2002, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V357, P1717
SWADLOW HA, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P25
TAMAS G, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P366
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
TROYER TW, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V87, P2741
VANESSEN DC, 1983, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V6, P370
VANESSEN DC, 1994, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN, P383
VRUWINK M, 2001, J COMP NEUROL, V441, P288
WIESEL TN, 1974, BRAIN RES, V79, P273
WISER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2724
WISER AK, 1997, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V14, P241
YABUTA NH, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P9489
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
48
JUN-JUL
2004
17
5-6
625
632
ISI:000223495600003
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Hansen, T
Neumann, H
A simple cell model with dominating opponent inhibition for robust image p
NEURAL NETWORKS
The extraction of oriented contrast information by cortical simple cells i
visual processing. The orientation selectivity originates at least partly
geniculate nuclei neurons with properly aligned receptive fields. In the pr
the feedforward interactions between on- and off-pathways. Based on physio
push-pull model with dominating opponent inhibition (DOI). We show that the m
data on simple cells, such as contrast-invariant orientation tuning, sharpen
increasing inhibition, and strong response decrements to stimuli with lumi
identical parameter settings, we apply the model for the processing of syn
We show that the model with DOI can robustly extract oriented contrast infor
important, noise is adaptively suppressed, i.e. the model simple cells do not
of different noise levels, while remaining sensitive to small contrast changes
reveal a possible functional role of the strong inhibition as observed empi
suppress responses to noisy input. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reser
C ALONSO JM, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P4002
R BORGGRAHAM LJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P369
CARANDINI M, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P470
CHENG H, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V74, P2548
COHEN MA, 1984, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V36, P428
COTTARIS NP, 1998, NATURE, V395, P896
FECHNER GT, 1889, ELEMENTE PSYCHOPHYSI
FERSTER D, 1988, J NEUROSCI, V8, P1172
FERSTER D, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P441
FURMAN GG, 1965, KYBERNETIK, V2, P257
GARDNER DK, 1999, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V16, P6
GILBERT CD, 1990, VISION RES, V30, P1689
GILBERT CD, 1992, NEURON, V9, P1
GROSSBERG S, 1970, J THEOR BIOL, V27, P291
GROSSBERG S, 1985, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V38, P141
GROSSBERG S, 1997, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V20, P106
GROSSBERG S, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P1413
HAMMOND P, 1983, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V337, P69
HANSEN T, 2003, THESIS ULM U FACULTY
HANSEN T, 2004, NEURAL COMPUT, V16, P1013
HEATH MD, 1997, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V19, P1338
HEGGELUND P, 1981, EXP BRAIN RES, V42, P89
HIRSCH JA, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P9517
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HODGKIN AL, 1964, CONDUCTION NERVOUS I
HUBEL DH, 1968, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V195, P215
JONES JP, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V58, P1187
JONES JP, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V58, P1233
KAPADIA MK, 1995, NEURON, V15, P843
KAPADIA MK, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P2048
KARA P, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P16261
LI ZN, 1999, INT J PATTERN RECOGN, V13, P25
LI ZP, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P903
LINDEBERG T, 1994, SCALE SPACE THEORY C
MARMARELIS PZ, 1972, SCIENCE, V175, P1276
MARMARELIS PZ, 1978, ANAL PHSYL SYSTEMS
MARR D, 1980, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V207, P187
MARR D, 1982, VISION
MINGOLLA E, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P499
MONIER C, 2003, NEURON, V37, P663
NEUMANN H, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P921
NEUMANN H, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P425
NEUMANN H, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P515
NEUMANN H, 2001, FRAGMENTS OBJECTS SE, V130, P353
NEUMANN H, 2003, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU, P271
OHZAWA I, 1985, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V54, P651
PALMER LA, 1981, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V46, P260
PEI X, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P7130
REID RC, 1995, NATURE, V378, P281
RINGACH DL, 1997, NATURE, V387, P281
RINGACH DL, 2002, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V88, P455
RINGACH DL, 2003, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V90, P342
SCHILLER PH, 1976, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V39, P1321
SCLAR G, 1982, EXP BRAIN RES, V46, P457
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SKOTTUN BC, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V57, P773
TOLHURST DJ, 1990, EXP BRAIN RES, V79, P582
TROY JB, 1993, EXP BRAIN RES, V93, P383
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
WEBER EH, 1846, HANDWORTERBUCH PHYSL, V149
WITKIN AP, 1983, 8TH P INT JOINT C AR, V2, P1019
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
61
JUN-JUL
2004
17
5-6
B
647
P
E
662
P
U
ISI:000223495600005
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Titterington, DM
Bayesian methods for neural networks and related models
STATISTICAL SCIENCE
Models such as feed-forward neural networks and certain other structures i
science literature are not amenable to closed-form Bayesian analysis. The
approaches taken to overcome this difficulty, involving the use of Gaussian
Monte Carlo simulation routines and a class of non-Gaussian but "determini
variational approximations.
C ANDRIEU C, 2000, ADV NEUR IN, V12, P379
R ANDRIEU C, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P2359
ARCHER GEB, 2002, J STAT PLAN INFER, V108, P365
ATTIAS H, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P803
ATTIAS H, 1999, P 15 C UNC ART INT, P21
ATTIAS H, 2000, ADV NEUR IN, V12, P209
BARBER D, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS MACH, P215
BERGER JO, 1985, STAT DECISION THEORY
BISHOP CM, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
BISHOP CM, 1998, ADV NEUR IN, V10, P416
BISHOP CM, 1998, NEUROCOMPUTING, V21, P203
BISHOP CM, 1999, P ICANN, V1, P509
BISHOP CM, 2000, P 16 C UNC ART INT, P46
BISHOP CM, 2003, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V15, P793
BUNTINE WL, 1991, COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V5, P603
CHAN KL, 2003, NEURAL COMPUT, V15, P1991
CHEN S, 2001, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V12, P1529
CHENG B, 1994, STAT SCI, V9, P2
CHOUDREY R, 2001, PARG0103 U OXF DEP E
CHU W, 2001, CD0115 NATL U SING
CORDEN LD, 2001, CELL ADHES COMMUN S, V8, P27
CSISZAR I, 1984, STATISTICS DECISIO S, V1, P205
DEFREITAS JFG, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P955
DEFREITAS N, 2001, P 18 C UNC ART INT, P120
DUANE S, 1987, PHYS LETT B, V195, P216
EDWARDS PJ, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P1456
GEIGER D, 1999, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M, P461
GENCAY R, 2001, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V12, P726
GHAHRAMANI Z, 1997, MACH LEARN, V29, P245
GHAHRAMANI Z, 2000, ADV NEUR IN, V12, P449
GHAHRAMANI Z, 2001, ADV NEUR IN, V13, P507
GIBBS MN, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P1458
GREEN PJ, 1995, BIOMETRIKA, V82, P711
HALL P, 2002, J ROY STAT SOC B 3, V64, P549
HASTIE T, 2001, ELEMENTS STAT LEARNI
HECKERMAN D, 1999, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M, P301
HINTON GE, 1993, P COLT 93 SANT CRUZ, P5
HOLMES CC, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1217
HUMPHREYS K, 2000, NEURAL PROCESS LETT, V12, P183
HUMPHREYS K, 2000, P COMP STAT 2000, P331
HUMPHREYS K, 2001, ADV MEAN FIELD METHO, P179
HUSMEIER D, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P677
HUSMEIER D, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P2685
JAAKKOLA T, 2001, ADV MEAN FIELD METHO, P129
JAAKKOLA TS, 2000, STAT COMPUT, V10, P25
JACOBS RA, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P231
JORDAN MI, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P181
JORDAN MI, 1999, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M
JORDAN MI, 1999, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M, P105
KAY JW, 1999, STAT NEURAL NETWORKS
KONISHI S, 2004, BIOMETRIKA, V91, P27
KWOK JTY, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P1018
KWOK JTY, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P1162
LAMPINEN J, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P257
LEE HKH, 2001, J CLASSIF, V18, P227
LEE HKH, 2003, MACH LEARN, V50, P197
LEISINK MAR, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P2149
LUTTRELL SP, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P767
MACKAY DJC, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P415
MACKAY DJC, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P448
MACKAY DJC, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P720
MACKAY DJC, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P469
MACKAY DJC, 1997, ENSEMBLE LEARNING HI
MACKAY DJC, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P1035
MEDEIROS MC, 2001, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V12, P755
MENG XL, 1997, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V59, P511
MISKIN J, 2000, ADV INDEPENDENT COMP, P123
MOODY JE, 1992, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V4, P847
MULLER P, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P749
NEAL RM, 1996, BAYESIAN LEARNING NE
NEAL RM, 1999, LEARNING GRAPHICAL M, P355
OPPER M, 2001, ADV MEAN FIELD METHO
PAIGE RL, 2001, BIOMETRIKA, V88, P623
PENG F, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P9535
PENNY WD, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P877
RIPLEY BD, 1994, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V56, P409
RIPLEY BD, 1995, PROBABILISTIC REASON, P97
RIPLEY BD, 1996, PATTERN RECOGNITION
SATO M, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P1649
SEEGER M, 2000, ADV NEUR IN, V12, P603
SOMMER FT, 1998, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V9, P705
SPIEGELHALTER DJ, 2002, J ROY STAT SOC B 4, V64, P583
TANAKA K, 2003, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V36, P11023
THODBERG HH, 1996, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V7, P56
TIPPING ME, 2000, ADV NEUR IN, V12, P652
TIPPING ME, 2001, J MACH LEARN RES, V1, P211
TITTERINGTON DM, 1985, STAT ANAL FINITE MIX
UEDA N, 2002, NEURAL NETWORKS, V15, P1223
UTSUGI A, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P623
UTSUGI A, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P2115
VANGESTEL T, 2002, NEURAL COMPUT, V14, P1115
VILA JP, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P265
VIVARELLI F, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P427
WATERHOUSE S, 1996, ADV NEUR IN, V8, P351
WILLIAMS CKI, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1203
WRIGHT WA, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P1261
YEDIDIA J, 2001, 200116 MERL TR
ZHANG BL, 2001, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V12, P765
ZHANG J, 1992, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V40, P2570
ZHANG J, 1993, IEEE T IMAGE PROCESS, V2, P27
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
100
FEB
2004
19
1
128
139
ISI:000223012900014
P
J
T
A Mooser, F
U Bosking, WH
Fitzpatrick, D
T
A morphological basis for orientation tuning in primary visual cortex
I
S
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
O
A Feedforward connections are thought to be important in the generation of or
B in visual cortex by establishing a bias in the sampling of information from
lie along a neuron's axis of preferred orientation. It remains unclear, ho
elements-dendrites or axons-are ultimately responsible for conveying this s
question, we have examined the spatial arrangement of feedforward axonal conn
neurons in layer 4 and orientation-selective neurons in layer 2/3 of visual co
sites of labeled boutons in layer 2/3 resulting from focal injections of b
orientation-specific axial bias that is sufficient to confer orientation tu
conclude that the anisotropic arrangement of axon terminals is the princip
bias contributed by feedforward connections.
C AHMED B, 1997, J COMP NEUROL, V380, P230
R ALONSO JM, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P4002
ANDERSON JC, 1999, NAT NEUROSCI, V2, P820
BLASDEL GG, 1984, J NEUROSCI, V4, P880
BLASDEL GG, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P3115
BONHOEFFER T, 1991, NATURE, V353, P429
BOSKING WH, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P2112
BOSKING WH, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P2346
BOSKING WH, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P874
BULLIER J, 1980, J COMP NEUROL, V193, P913
CARANDINI M, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P470
CHAPMAN B, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1347
CHISUM HJ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P2947
CHUNG S, 1998, NEURON, V20, P1177
DOUGLAS RJ, 1995, SCIENCE, V269, P981
FERSTER D, 1996, NATURE, V380, P249
FITZPATRICK D, 1987, J COMP NEUROL, V264, P73
FITZPATRICK D, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P329
FREUND TF, 1985, J COMP NEUROL, V242, P275
HATA Y, 1988, NATURE, V335, P815
HENDRY SHC, 1987, J NEUROSCI, V7, P1503
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
HUBEL DH, 1968, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V195, P215
HUBEL DH, 1977, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V198, P1
HUMPHREY AL, 1980, J COMP NEUROL, V192, P531
HUMPHREY AL, 1980, J COMP NEUROL, V192, P549
KRETZ R, 1986, J COMP NEUROL, V251, P135
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
LUND JS, 1987, J COMP NEUROL, V257, P60
LUND JS, 1991, J COMP NEUROL, V311, P234
MARTINEZDIAZ JJ, 2002, TECTONOPHYSICS, V356, P291
REID RC, 1995, NATURE, V378, P281
RINGACH DL, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P5639
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1997, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V7, P514
TANAKA K, 1983, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V49, P1303
TANAKA K, 1985, VISION RES, V25, P357
TUCKER TR, 2004, VISUAL NEUROSCIENCES, P733
USREY WM, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P1203
WIELAARD DJ, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P5203
WILSON JR, 1984, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V221, P411
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
43
AUG
2004
7
8
872
879
ISI:000222930800018
J
Marchini, J
Presanis, A
Comparing methods of analyzing fMRI statistical parametric maps
NEUROIMAGE
Approaches for the analysis of statistical parametric maps (SPMs) can be cr
categories in which different philosophies are applied to delineate activa
I error control thresholding, false discovery rate (FDR) control threshold
thresholding. To better understand the properties of these main approaches
study to compare the approaches as they would be used on real data sets. Us
that posterior probability thresholding is the most powerful approach, and typ
provides the lowest levels of type I error. False discovery rate control thr
the other approaches for both these criteria, although for some parameter
approximate the performance of posterior probability thresholding. Based on
relative merits of the three approaches in an attempt to decide upon an optim
viewing the problem of delineating areas of activation as a classification
interpretable framework for comparing the methods. Within this framework,
loss function, which explicitly penalizes the types of errors that may occur
Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
C ALDER R, 1981, GEOMETRY RANDOM FIEL
R BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P240
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BECKMANN CF, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, S614
BECKMANN CF, 2001, NEUROIMAGE S 2, V13, S75
BECKMANN CF, 2001, NEUROIMAGE S 2, V13, S76
BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V57, P289
BENJAMINI Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
BULLMORE E, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V12, P61
BULLMORE ET, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P32
DESCOMBES X, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P1028
EVERITT BS, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P1
FADILI M, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P60
FORMAN SD, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V33, P636
FRISTON KJ, 1991, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V11, P690
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P214
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P157
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P166
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
FRISTON KJ, 1996, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V4, P140
FRISTON KJ, 1996, NEUROIMAGE 1, V4, P223
FRISTON KJ, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P465
FRISTON KJ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, P1240
GEMAN S, 1984, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V6, P721
GEMAN S, 1987, B INT STAT I, V52, P5
GENOVESE CR, 2001, THRESHOLDING STAT MA
GOSSL C, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V43, P72
GOSSL C, 2000, P INT SOC MAGN RESON, V8, P816
GOSSL C, 2001, BIOMETRICS, V57, P554
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
HARTVIG NV, 1999, STOCHASTIC GEOMETRY
HARTVIG NV, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V11, P233
HAYASAKA S, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V20, P2343
HOJENSORENSEN P, 2000, ADV NEURAL INF PROCE, V12
HOLMES AP, 1993, ANN NUCL MED, V7, S106
HOLMES AP, 1994, THESIS U GLASGOW
HOLMES AP, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P7
HOLMES AP, 1999, HBM1999 C
JENKINSON M, 2001, FAST AUTOMATED N DIM
JENKINSON M, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P825
KIEBEL SJ, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P756
KIMURA Y, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P554
LOCASCIO JJ, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P168
MARCHINI J, 2002, R NEWS, V2, P17
MATTHEWS PM, 2001, FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P368
NICHOLS T, 2003, STAT METHODS MED RES, V12, P419
POLINE JB, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P425
POLINE JB, 1994, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V2, P103
POLINE JB, 1994, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V14, P639
POLINE JB, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P83
RAZ J, 1999, P SPIE C WAVELET APP, V8
RIPLEY BD, 1996, PATTERN RECOGNITION
STOREY JD, 2002, J ROY STAT SOC B 3, V64, P479
STOREY SJ, 2003, ANN STAT, V31, P2013
TONONI G, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P133
TURKHEIMER FE, 1999, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V19, P1189
TURKHEIMER FE, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P920
WORLSEY KJ, 1992, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V12, P900
WORSLEY KJ, 1994, ADV APPL PROBAB, V26, P13
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, ADV APPL PROBAB, V27, P943
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P173
WORSLEY KJ, 1996, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V4, P74
WORSLEY KJ, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P254
WORSLEY KJ, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P305
WORSLEY KJ, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P98
WORSLEY KJ, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P1
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
71
JUL
2004
22
3
1203
P
E
1213
P
U
ISI:000222423200018
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Lauritzen, TZ
Miller, KD
The contributions of inhibition and noise to responses in V1
NEUROCOMPUTING
We include a recently described class of inhibitory cells, complex cells unt
as simple cells in a model of VI to study their contribution in shaping si
complex cell inhibition can suffice to explain contrast-invariant orientatio
frequency tuning of cortical simple cells. Given this complex cell inhibit
inhibition from tuned simple inhibitory neurons acts to sharpen spatial freq
stability of cortical activity. Intracortical inhibition is needed to achie
voltage tuning, which is converted by physiological noise levels into cont
(C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C ANDERSON JS, 2000, SCIENCE, V290, P1968
R DESTEXHE A, 2001, NEUROSCIENCE, V107, P13
FERSTER D, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P441
HIRSCH JA, 2000, SOC NEUR ABSTR, V26, P1083
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
KRUKOWSKI AE, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P424
LAMPL I, 1999, NEURON, V22, P361
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
PALMER S, 2002, EFFECTS INHIBITORY C
SKOTTUN BC, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V57, P773
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
UHLENBECK GE, 1930, PHYS REV, V36, P823
N
13
R
P
JUN
D
P
2004
Y
V
58-60
L
B 901
P
E
907
P
U
ISI:000222245900130
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Fregnac, Y
U Monier, C
Chavane, F
Baudot, P
Graham, L
T
Shunting inhibition, a silent step in visual cortical computation
I
S
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS
O
A Brain computation, in the early visual system, is often considered as a hi
B features extracted ill a given sensory relay are not present in previous s
particular, orientation preference and its fine tuning selectivity are fun
most cortical cells and they are not observed at the preceding geniculate
identifying the mechanisms and circuitry underlying these computations. Seve
have been proposed, giving different weights to the feedforward thalamocorti
recurrent architectures. Within this context, an important issue is whethe
fundamental for the genesis of stimulus selectivity, or rather normalizes spik
to other features such as stimulus strength or contrast, without influenci
preference expressed in the excitatory input alone. We review here experim
the presence or absence of inhibitory input evoked by non-preferred orientat
current clamp and voltage clamp recordings are analyzed in the light of ne
increase the visibility of inhibitory input, and (2) to continuously measure
of input conductances. We conclude that there exists a diversity of synaptic
the same profile of spike-based orientation selectivity, and that this div
anatomical non-homogeneities in input sampling provided by the local contex
intracortical network in which the considered cortical cell is embedded. (
Ltd.
C ADOJARN P, 1999, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V16, P303
R ANDERSON JS, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P909
ANDERSON JS, 2000, SCIENCE, V290, P1968
BENYISHAI R, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P3844
BERMAN NJ, 1991, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V440, P697
BORGGRAHAM L, 1996, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V90, P185
BORGGRAHAM LJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P369
BRINGUIER V, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P695
CARANDINI M, 1994, SCIENCE, V264, P1333
CARANDINI M, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P401
CHAPMAN B, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1347
CHAVANE F, 2000, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V94, P333
CHUNG S, 1998, NEURON, V20, P1177
CROOK JM, 1998, EUR J NEUROSCI, V10, P2056
DAS A, 1999, NATURE, V399, P655
DEANGELIS GC, 1995, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V18, P451
DOUGLAS RJ, IN PRESS ANN REV NEU
DOUGLAS RJ, 1988, NATURE, V332, P642
DOUGLAS RJ, 1991, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V440, P735
DOUGLAS RJ, 1995, SCIENCE, V269, P981
DRAGOI V, 2001, NATURE, V411, P80
FERSTER D, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P1262
FERSTER D, 1996, NATURE, V380, P249
FERSTER D, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P441
HIRSCH JA, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P9517
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
HUBEL DH, 1962, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V160, P106
KOCH C, 1985, MODELS VISUAL CORTEX, P408
KOCH C, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P1728
LAURITZEN TZ, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P10201
MARTINEZ LM, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V540, P321
MCLAUGHLIN D, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P8087
MONIER C, 2003, NEURON, V37, P663
MORRONE MC, 1982, P R SOC B, V216, P335
NELSON S, 1994, SCIENCE, V265, P774
PINTO DJ, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V83, P1158
REID RC, 1995, NATURE, V378, P281
SCHUMMERS J, 2002, NEURON, V36, P969
SCLAR G, 1982, EXP BRAIN RES, V46, P457
SHAPLEY R, 2003, NEURON, V38, P689
SILLITO AM, 1979, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V289, P33
SILLITO AM, 1980, BRAIN RES, V194, P517
SKOTTUN BC, 1987, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V57, P773
SOMERS DC, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P204
THORPE S, 1996, NATURE, V381, P520
TROYER TW, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P5908
WORGOTTER F, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, P201
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
47
JUL-NOV
2003
97
4-6
S
B
441
P
E
451
P
U
ISI:000222168100007
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Dimitriadou, E
U Barth, M
Windischberger, C
Hornik, K
Moser, E
T
A quantitative comparison of functional MRI cluster analysis
I
S
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
O
A The aim of this work is to compare the efficiency and power of several cluste
B artificial (mathematical) and synthesized (hybrid) functional magnetic reson
The clustering algorithms used are hierarchical, crisp (neural gas, self-orga
learning, k-means, maximin-distance, CLARA) and fuzzy (c-means, fuzzy comp
these methods we use two performance measures, namely the correlation coeffi
coefficient (wJC). Both performance coefficients (PCs) clearly show that t
algorithm perform significantly better than all the other methods using ou
methods the ward linkage algorithm performs best under our simulation desi
gas method seems to be the best choice for fMRI cluster analysis, given it
activated pixels (true positives (TPs)) whilst minimizing the misclassific
(false positives (FPs)), and in the stability of the results achieved. (C)
reserved.
C ANDERBERG MR, 1973, HIERERCHIAL CLUSTERI, P131
R ANDERBERG MR, 1973, MEASURES ASS VARIABL, P89
BACKFRIEDER W, 1996, PHYS MED BIOL, V41, P1425
BARTH M, 1997, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V15, P745
BARTH M, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P321
BARTH M, 2001, NMR BIOMED, V14, P484
BARTH M, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, S371
BARTH M, 2003, P 11 SCI M INT SOC M, P1817
BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
DIMITRAIDOU E, 2002, P 19 ANN M EUR SOC M, V15, P163
DIMITRIADOU E, 2001, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2130, P217
DIMITRIADOU E, 2002, CCLUST CONVEX CLUSTE
DIMITRIADOU E, 2002, E1071 MISC FUNCTIONS
DIMITRIADOU E, 2002, INT J PATTERN RECOGN, V16, P901
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRITZKE B, 1997, SOME COMPETITIVE LEA
GOLAY X, 1997, P 3 INT C FUNCT MAPP, V3, S481
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
IHAKA R, 1996, J COMPUTATIONAL GRAP, V5, P299
JARMASZ M, 2002, ARTIF INTELL MED, V25, P45
KAUFMAN L, 1990, CLUSTERING LARGE APP, P126
KOHONEN T, 1989, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
LINDE Y, 1980, IEEE T COMMUN, V28, P84
MARTINETZ TM, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P558
MCINYRE M, 1996, P 2 INT C FUNCT MAPP, V3, S582
MOLLER U, 2001, NEUROIMAGE 1, V14, P206
MOLLER U, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P431
MOSER E, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1102
MOSER E, 1999, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V10, P166
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
OGAWA S, 1993, BIOPHYS J, V64, P803
PAL NR, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P787
PIZZI NJ, 2001, ARTIF INTELL MED, V21, P263
ROUSSEEUW P, 2002, CLUSTER FUNCTIONS CL
SCARTH G, 1996, P 2 INT C FUNCT MAPP, V2, S89
SOMORJAI R, 2002, EXPLORATORY ANAL FMR
TOFT P, 1997, P 3 INT C FUNCT MAPP, V3, S456
TOU JT, 1974, PATTERN RECOGN, P92
WEINGESSEL A, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS APPL, P31
WINDISCHBERGER C, 2003, ARTIF INTELL MED, V29, P203
WINDISCHBERGER C, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V20, P225
YAN J, 2002, GENESOM SELF ORG MAP
ZEGER K, 1992, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V40, P310
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
50
MAY
2004
31
1
B
57
P
E
71
P
U
ISI:000222256000004
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Zhu, YH
U Stornetta, RL
Zhu, JJ
T Chandelier cells control excessive cortical excitation: Characteristics of
I responses of layer 2/3 nonpyramidal and pyramidal neurons
S
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
O
A Chandelier cells form inhibitory axo-axonic synapses on pyramidal neurons
B candlestick-like axonal terminals. The functional role of chandelier cells i
preferential loss of this cell type at epileptic loci suggests a role in e
examination of whisker-and spontaneous activity-evoked responses in chandelie
nonpyramidal neurons and regular-spiking pyramidal neurons in layer 2/3 of th
nonpyramidal neurons, including chandelier cells, basket cells, neurogliafor
net basket cells, bitufted cells, and regular-spiking pyramidal neurons al
multiple whiskers on the contralateral face. Whisker stimulation, however,
preceded by an earlier IPSP and no action potentials in chandelier cells, diff
and pyramidal neurons. In addition, chandelier cells display a larger rece
than other fast-spiking nonpyramidal neurons and pyramidal neurons. Notably,
in vivo recordings show that chandelier cells, which rarely fire action po
more robustly than other types of cortical neurons when the overall cortica
chandelier cells may not process fast ascending sensory information but inst
excessive excitatory activity in neuronal networks.
C AGMON A, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P319
R ARELLANO JI, 2004, BRAIN 1, V127, P45
ARMSTRONGJAMES M, 1987, J COMP NEUROL, V263, P265
BEIERLEIN M, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P904
BORGGRAHAM LJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P369
BRECHT M, 2002, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V543, P49
BRECHT M, 2003, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V553, P243
BRUMBERG JC, 1996, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V76, P130
BRUNO RM, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P10966
BUHL EH, 1994, NATURE, V368, P823
CARVELL GE, 1988, BRAIN RES, V448, P186
CAULI B, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P6144
CHAPIN JK, 1984, J COMP NEUROL, V229, P199
COHEN I, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P1418
CONNORS BW, 1984, NATURE, V310, P685
COX CL, 2000, NEURON, V27, P597
DEFELIPE J, 1999, BRAIN 10, V122, P1807
DOSSI RC, 1992, NEUROSCIENCE, V47, P279
DYKES RW, 1977, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V40, P997
FOX K, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P8380
FREUND TF, 1988, NEUROSCIENCE, V27, P373
GALARRETA M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P72
GALARRETA M, 2001, SCIENCE, V292, P2295
GHAZANFAR AA, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P348
GIBSON JR, 1999, NATURE, V402, P75
GOLDREICH D, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V82, P1311
GOTTLIEB JP, 1997, EXP BRAIN RES, V115, P47
GUPTA A, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P273
HELLWEG FC, 1977, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V40, P463
HIRSCH JA, 2003, NAT NEUROSCI, V6, P1300
ITO M, 1992, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V454, P247
KAISER KMM, 2001, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V535, P17
KARUBE F, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P2853
KAWAGUCHI Y, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P2638
KAWAGUCHI Y, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P476
KLAUSBERGER T, 2003, NATURE, V421, P844
LARKUM ME, 1999, NATURE, V398, P338
LARKUM ME, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P6991
LI XG, 1992, EXP BRAIN RES, V90, P519
MARCO P, 1996, BRAIN 4, V119, P1327
MARGRIE TW, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P319
MARGRIE TW, 2003, NEURON, V39, P911
MILES R, 1996, NEURON, V16, P815
MOORE CI, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V80, P2882
PARRA P, 1998, NEURON, V20, P983
PERREAULT MC, 2003, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V546, P137
PETERS A, 1984, CEREBRAL CORTEX
PETERSEN CCH, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P13638
PORTER JT, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2699
PRINCE DA, 1986, ADV NEUROL, V44, P275
PRINCE DA, 1999, ADV NEUROL, V79, P665
REYES A, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P279
RIBAK CE, 1985, BRAIN RES, V326, P251
SACHDEV RNS, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V84, P1497
SIMONS DJ, 1983, BRAIN RES, V276, P178
SOMOGYI P, 1983, BRAIN RES, V259, P137
SOMOGYI P, 1998, BRAIN RES REV, V26, P113
STERN EA, 2001, NEURON, V31, P305
SWADLOW HA, 2002, NAT NEUROSCI, V5, P403
SZENTAGOTHAI J, 1974, NEUROSCIENCES RES PR, V12, P305
TAMAS G, 2003, SCIENCE, V299, P1902
WEHR M, 2003, NATURE, V426, P442
WILLIAMS RS, 1977, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V34, P298
WONG RKS, 1979, SCIENCE, V204, P1228
ZHU JJ, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V80, P1122
ZHU JJ, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V81, P1171
ZHU JJ, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P1148
ZHU YH, 2004, J NEUROSCI, V24, P1272
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
68
JUN 2
2004
24
22
5101
5108
ISI:000221883100003
J
Frost, CD
Toner, RN
Strontium isotopic identification of water-rock interaction and ground wat
GROUND WATER
Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios of ground waters in the Bighorn and Laramie basins' carb
aquifer systems, Wyoming, United States, reflect the distinctive strontium
minerals in their respective aquifers. Well water samples from the Madison
strontium isotopic ratios that match their carbonate host rocks. Casper Aq
Basin) have strontium isotopic ratios that differ from the bulk host rock;
Casper Sandstone indicates that most of the strontium in Casper Aquifer gr
preferential dissolution of carbonate cement. Strontium isotope data from bo
along with dye tracing experiments in the Bighorn Basin and tritium data fr
that waters in carbonate or carbonate-cemented aquifers acquire their stron
quickly-on the order of decades.
Strontium isotopes were also used successfully to verify previously identifie
waters in the Laramie Basin. The strontium isotopic compositions of ground wat
also suggest previously unrecognized mixing between Casper and Precambrian
demonstrate the utility of strontium isotopic ratio data in identifying gro
interactions.
C ARMSTRONG SC, 1998, APPL GEOCHEM, V13, P463
R BANNER JL, 1994, GEOLOGY, V22, P687
BLUM JD, 1997, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V61, P3193
BOYD DW, 1993, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WY, V5, P164
BULLEN TD, 1996, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V60, P1807
CHAUDHURI S, 1987, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V51, P45
CHEN X, 1997, CONTRIB GEOL U WYOMI, V31, P27
CLINE C, 1995, COMMUNICATION 0930
COLLERSON KD, 1988, GEOLOGY, V16, P59
DARTON NH, 1906, 51 US GEOL SURV
EDMUNDS WM, 1984, MINERAL MAG, V48, P407
EDMUNDS WM, 1987, GEOL ASSOC CAN SPEC, V33, P127
FAURE G, 1986, PRINCIPLES ISOTOPE G
FRANKLYN MT, 1991, CHEM GEOL, V86, P111
FROST CD, 1999, J PETROL, V40, P1771
FROST CD, 2000, ROCKY MOUNTAIN GEOLO, V35, P71
FROST CD, 2002, GEOLOGY, V30, P923
GOSSELIN DC, 2001, GROUND WATER, V39, P98
HUNTOON PW, 1979, GROUND WATER, V17, P463
HUNTOON PW, 1985, GROUND WATER, V23, P345
JARVIS WT, 1986, THESIS U WYOMING
JOHNSON TM, 1997, GEOL SOC AM ABSTR, V29, P309
JOHNSON TM, 1997, WATER RESOUR RES, V33, P197
KAY RLF, 1986, P 5 INT S WAT ROCK I, P329
KIRN DJ, 1972, THESIS U WYOMING
LI W, 1989, P 6 INT S WAT INT MA, P441
LUNDY DA, 1978, THESIS U WYOMING
LYONS WB, 1995, J HYDROL, V167, P225
MANKIEWICZ D, 1979, SOC EC PALEONTOLOGIS, V26, P319
MAZOR E, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P193
MCBRIDE JJ, 1995, AAPG BULL, V79, P1235
MCNUTT RH, 1990, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V54, P205
MEARNS EW, 1995, AAPG BULL, V79, P1235
PETERMAN ZE, 1992, P 7 INT S WAT ROCK I, V1, P825
SIEMBILLE F, 1998, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V157, P183
SIMONETTI A, 2000, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V64, P3439
SMALLEY PC, 1992, APPL GEOCHEM, V7, P341
SMALLEY PC, 1995, GEOLOGICAL SOC SPECI, V86, P59
SOMMER FT, 1998, AAPG BULL, V82, P1969
TESSIER A, 1979, ANAL CHEM, V51, P844
VIETTI BT, 1977, THESIS U WYOMING
YOUNUS M, 1992, THESIS U WYOMING
N 42
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
MAY-JUN
2004
42
3
418
432
ISI:000221172400012
P
J
T
A Nishikawa, T
U Lai, YC
Hoppensteadt, FC
T
Capacity of oscillatory associative-memory networks with error-free retrie
I
S
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
O
A Networks of coupled periodic oscillators (similar to the Kuramoto model) ha
B associative memory. However, error-free retrieval states of such oscillato
unstable, resulting in a near zero capacity. This puts the networks at disa
classical Hopfield network. Here we propose a simple remedy for this undesirabl
that the error-free capacity of our oscillatory, associative-memory network
of the Hopfield network. They can thus not only provide insights into the
but can also be potentially useful for applications in information science
C AONISHI T, 1998, PHYS REV E, V58, P4865
R AONISHI T, 1999, PHYS REV LETT, V82, P2800
AOYAGI T, 1995, PHYS REV LETT, V74, P4075
COOK J, 1989, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V22, P2057
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
HERTZ J, 1991, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPPENSTEADT FC, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P734
HOPPENSTEADT FC, 2000, PHYS REV E B, V62, P4010
HOPPENSTEADT FC, 2001, IEEE T CIRCUITS-I, V48, P133
KURAMOTO Y, 1984, CHEM OSCILLATIONS WA
LECUN Y, 1991, PHYS REV LETT, V66, P2396
MARCHENKO VA, 1967, MAT SBORNIK, V72, P507
NISHIKAWA T, IN PRESS
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STROGATZ SH, 2000, PHYSICA D, V143, P1
VAADIA E, 1995, NATURE, V373, P515
YAMANA M, 1999, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V32, P3525
YOSHIOKA M, 2000, PHYS REV E A, V61, P4732
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
A
R
U
T
E
R
19
MAR 12
2004
92
10
108101
ISI:000220185600060
P
J
T
A Soltanian-Zadeh, H
U Peck, DJ
Hearshen, DO
Lajiness-O'Neill, RR
T
Model-independent method for fMRI analysis
I
S
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
O
A This paper presents a fast method for delineation of activated areas of the b
B resonance imaging (fMRI) time series data. The steps of the work accomplis
shown that the detection performance evaluated by the area under the recei
curve is directly related to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the compos
detection process. 2) Detection and segmentation of activated areas are fo
framework. In this formulation, a linear transformation (image combination me
to maximize the SNR of the activated areas subject to the constraint of re
analytical solution for the problem is found. 4) Image pixel vectors and e
(signature) for inactive pixels are used to calculate weighting vector and
5) Signatures of the activated regions are used to segment different activ
the proposed method are compared with those generated by the conventional metho
and z statistic). Detection performance and SNRs of the images are compare
outperforms the conventional methods of fMRI analysis. In addition, it is m
require a priori knowledge of the fMRI response to the paradigm. Since the
the work is done analytically, numerical implementation and execution of th
the conventional methods.
C AGUIRRE GK, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P500
R AGUIRRE GK, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P360
ANDERSEN AH, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P795
ARDEKANI BA, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P101
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BARTH M, 2001, NMR BIOMED, V14, P484
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BINDER JR, 1995, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V52, P593
BINDER JR, 1996, BRAIN 4, V119, P1239
BINDER JR, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P353
BISWAL BB, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P265
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
BUXTON RB, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P855
CALHOUN VD, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P43
CALHOUN VD, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V14, P140
CALHOUN VD, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1080
CHIU MJ, 2001, J DIGIT IMAGING, V14, P38
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
CLARE S, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P1117
CONNELLY A, 1995, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P1233
COX RW, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V33, P230
DESCOMBES X, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P1028
DEYOE EA, 1992, P SMRM 11 ANN M BERL, P1824
DIERKS T, 1999, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V90, P67
FADILI MJ, 1998, P ANN INT IEEE E 1-6, V20, P696
FEDILI MJ, 2000, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V10, P160
FRANK LR, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P132
FRIMAN O, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V45, P323
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P153
FRISTON KJ, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P41
FU Z, 1998, P IPCIP 98 INT C IM, P709
GEMBRIS D, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V43, P259
GOLUB GH, 1990, MATRIX COMPUTATIONS
GUTTE C, 2001, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V13, P165
HENRIKSEN O, 1993, ACTA RADIOL, V34, P101
KIM SG, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V37, P631
LAI S, 1997, P INT SOC MAGN RES M, P1671
LEE CC, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P1297
LUENBERGER DG, 1969, OPTIMIZATION VECTOR
MCKEOWN MJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P24
NAN FY, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P320
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
NOLL DC, 1991, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V10, P629
NOLL DC, 1995, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V5, P49
NOLL DC, 1999, FUNCTIONAL MRI, P149
PRESS WH, 1992, NUMERICAL RECIPES C
ROMBOUTS SARB, 1997, AM J NEURORADIOL, V18, P1317
RUTTIMAN UE, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P142
SALLI E, 2001, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V20, P403
SIEWERT B, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V36, P249
SKUDLARSKI P, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P311
SOLTANIANZADEH H, 1992, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V11, P302
SOLTANIANZADEH H, 1992, THESIS U MICHIGAN AN
SPRINGER JA, 1999, BRAIN, V122, P101
STONE JV, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P407
TSCHARNER VV, 2001, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V20, P704
VILLRINGER A, 1995, CEREBROVAS BRAIN MET, V7, P240
WENZ F, 1994, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P975
WOOD GK, 1991, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P1013
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
60
MAR
2004
23
3
285
296
ISI:000220103100002
J
Omori, T
Horiguchi, T
Dynamical properties of neural network model for working memory with Hodgk
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS
We propose a neural network model of working memory with one-compartmental
dynamical properties. We assume that the model consists of excitatory neuron
the neurons are connected to each other. The excitatory neurons are distin
selective neurons and one group of non-selective neurons. The selective ne
subpopulations in which each selective neuron belongs to only one of subpo
neurons are assumed not to form any subpopulation. Synaptic strengths between
are assumed to be potentiated. By the numerical simulations, persistent firing
emerges; the persistent firing corresponds to the retention of memory as on
memory. We find that the strength of external input and the strength of N-m
important factors for dynamical behaviors of the network; for example, if w
external input to a subpopulation while the persistent firing is occurring
persistent firing occurs in the subpopulation or is sustained against the
reveal that the neural network as for the function of the working memory is con
and the external stimuli within the proposed model. We also find that the
the selective neurons shows a kind of phase transition as a function of th
synapses, (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C AMIT DJ, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P435
R BEAR MF, 1996, NEUROSCIENCE EXPLORI
BRODY CD, 2003, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V13, P204
BRUNEL N, 2001, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V11, P63
CASADO JM, 2003, PHYS LETT A, V310, P400
COMPTE A, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P1047
DESTEXHE A, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P14
DURSTEWITZ D, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P2807
DURSTEWITZ D, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V83, P1733
DURSTEWITZ D, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P1184
FUNAHASHI S, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V61, P331
GOLDMANRAKIC PS, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P13473
HODGKIN AL, 1952, J PHYSIOL, V117, P500
JENSEN O, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P575
KIM S, 2000, PHYSICA A, V288, P380
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V44, P19
KRAUSE JB, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P847
KWON O, 2002, PHYS LETT A, V298, P319
LISMAN JE, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P273
MIYASHITA S, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V52, P327
RANGANATH C, 2003, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V41, P378
READ HL, 1996, NEUROSCIENCE, V75, P301
RENART A, 2003, NEURON, V38, P473
TEGNER J, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V5, P471
WANG XJ, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P6402
N
25
R
P
MAR 15
D
P
2004
Y
V
334
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
3-4
600
614
ISI:000189094800019
P
S
T
A Aligue, FJL
U Sotoca, IA
Troncoso, IA
Orellana, CJG
Velasco, HG
T
A neural associative pattern classifier
I
S
ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE - IBERAMIA 2002, PROCEEDINGS
O
S
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
E
A In this work, we study the behaviour of the Bidirectional Associative Memory (
B neural structure, with a view to its possible improvements as a useful Patter
associations from unknown inputs, once mentioned classes have been previous
prototypes. The best results have been obtained by suitably choosing the t
thresholds, and the activation functions of the network's neurones, by mean
described in the paper. In order to put forward the advantages of these pro
has been applied on an especially popular hand-written character set as the
database, and with one of the UCI's data bases. In all cases, the method l
the performance achievable by a BAM, with a 0% error rate.
C *NAT I STAND TECHN, 1995, NIST SPEC DAT BAS 19
R ALIPPI C, 1994, P IEEE INT S CIRC SY, P1376
ANDERSON JA, 1972, MATH BIOSCI, V14, P197
ARICA N, 2001, IEEE T SYST MAN CY C, V31, P216
ARTHITHAN G, 1997, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V8, P1483
BOLLE D, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P455
BUCKINGHAM J, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P441
CHUA LO, 1988, IEEE T CIRCUITS SYST, V35, P1257
CRESPI B, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P1376
HEEKUCK OH, 1994, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V5, P576
KOHONEN T, 1977, ASS MEMORY SYSTEM HE
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
KRETZSCHMAR R, 2000, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, V4, P373
KUMAR S, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P1023
LEE DL, 1998, ELECTRON LETT, V34, P736
LEUNG CS, 1991, P 1991 IEEE INT JOIN, V1, P124
LEUNG CS, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P879
MERZ CJ, 1998, UCI REPOSITORY MACHI
MULLER P, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P571
NADAL JP, 1990, NETWORK, V1, P61
PARK J, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P107
QUINLAN JR, 1987, INT J MAN MACHINE ST
SIMPSON PK, 1990, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V20, P637
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
STEIN MK, 1991, P 13 ANN M N AM CHAP, V1, P36
TAN M, 1988, P 5 INT C MACH LEARN, P121
WANG YF, 1990, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V1, P81
WANG YF, 1991, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P559
WANG YF, 1993, NEURAL NETWORKS, V6, P1169
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WJENG YC, 1998, IEEE ELECT LETT, V27, P1818
WU YQ, 2000, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V11, P859
ZHUANG XH, 1993, NEURAL NETWORKS, V6, P1131
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
33
2002
2527
430
439
ISI:000189008100044
S
Thirion, B
Faugeras, O
Feature detection in fMRI data: The information bottleneck approach
MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2003,
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
Clustering is a well-known technique for the analysis of fMRI data, whose
B flexibility: given a metric on the dataset, it defines the main features contai
to this approach are also the problem of defining correctly the quantizatio
clusters necessary to describe the data. The Information Bottleneck (IB) ap
[11] addresses these difficulties: 1) it deals with an explicit tradeoff b
fidelity; 2) it does so during the clustering procedure. and not post hoc;
statistical distribution of the features within the feature space and not
last, it is principled through an information theoretic formulation, which i
In this paper, we present how to benefit from this method to analyze fMRI
clustering of voxels according to the magnitude of their responses to seve
The IB quantization provides a consistent representation of the data, allowi
C BALSLEV D, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V15, P135
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
FADILI MJ, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P160
FADILI MJ, 2001, MED IMAGE ANAL, V5, P55
FRISTON KJ, 1997, 97 SPM
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
MOLLER U, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P431
PEUSKENS H, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2451
TISHBY N, 1999, P 37 ANN ALL C COMM, P368
WISMULLER A, 2002, INT J COMPUT VISION, V46, P103
N
12
R
P
2003
Y
V
2879
L
B
83
P
E
91
P
U
ISI:000188180400011
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Chen, S
U Bouman, CA
Lowe, MJ
T
Clustered components analysis for functional MRI
I
S
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
O
A A common method of increasing hemodynamic response (SNR) in functional magn
B is to average signal timecourses across voxels. This technique is potentia
hemodynamic response may vary across the brain. Such averaging may destroy
temporal evolution of the fMRI response that stem from either differences i
tissue or actual differences in the neural response between two averaged vox
presented in this paper in order to aid in an improved SNR estimate of the
preserving statistically significant voxel-wise differences. The first tec
estimation for periodic stimulus paradigms that involves a simple thresholdi
via dimensionality reduction. The second technique that we call clustered c
amplitude-independent clustering method based upon an explicit statistical
unsupervised method for estimating the number of clusters. Our methods are
verification and comparison to other techniques. A human experiment was also d
functional cortices. Our methods separated hemodynamic response signals in
classified according to tissue characteristics.
C ARDEKANI BA, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P101
R BACKFRIEDER W, 1996, PHYS MED BIOL, V41, P1425
BANDETTINI PA, 1992, MAGNET RESON MED, V25, P390
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BELL AJ, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P1129
BELLIVEAU JW, 1991, SCIENCE, V254, P716
BOUMAN CA, 1997, CLUSTER UNSUPERVISED
BOYNTON GM, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P4207
BRANKOV JG, 2002, P IEEE INT C IM PROC, V1, P97
BULLMORE ET, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V4, P16
BUXTON RB, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P855
CHEN S, 2000, P ISMRM 8 SCI M APR, P817
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
COHEN MS, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P93
COX RW, 1996, COMPUT BIOMED RES, V29, P162
DEMPSTER AP, 1977, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V39, P1
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P69
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
FRISTON KJ, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P373
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
HATHOUT GM, 1995, INVEST RADIOL, V30, P669
JOHNSON RA, 1998, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST
KRUGGEL F, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P259
KWONG KK, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P5675
LIANG Z, 1992, IEEE T NUCL SCI, V39, P1126
LOWE JB, 1999, AUST NZ J PUBL HEAL, V23, P3
LOWE MJ, 2000, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V20, P1331
LOWE MJ, 2000, P ISMRM 8 SCI M CO, P888
MAKEIG S, 2001, EEG ICA TOOLBOX MATL
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P368
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P803
OGAWA S, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P9868
PHILLIPS MD, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V220, P202
PURDON PL, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P912
REDNER E, 1984, SIAM REV, V26
RISSANEN J, 1983, ANN STAT, V11, P417
SIJBERS J, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P87
SOLE AF, 2001, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V20, P86
SOLO V, 2001, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V20, P26
SYCHRA JJ, 1994, MED PHYS, V21, P193
VAZQUEZ AL, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P108
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
47
JAN
2004
23
1
85
98
ISI:000187845700009
J
Kotter, R
Stephan, ME
Network participation indices: characterizing componet roles for information
NEURAL NETWORKS
We propose a set of indices that characterize-on the basis of connectivity
participates in a larger network and what roles it may take given the spec
These Network Participation Indices are derived from simple graph theoreti
interesting property of linking local features of individual network compone
that arise within the network as a whole. We use connectivity data on larg
demonstrate the virtues of this approach and highlight some interesting feat
up in previously published material. Some implications of our approach for def
relevant to functional segregation and functional integration, for example, f
are discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C ALBERT R, 2000, NATURE, V406, P378
R BARBAS H, 1989, J COMP NEUROL, V286, P353
BORG I, 1997, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO
BOTVINICK M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P179
BRAENDGAARD H, 1990, J MICROSC-OXFORD, V157, P285
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
BUCHEL C, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P768
BULLMORE E, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P289
BURNS GAPC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P55
CARMICHAEL ST, 1994, J COMP NEUROL, V346, P366
CARTER CS, 1999, REV NEUROSCIENCE, V10, P49
CHEN N, 2002, NEUROSCIENCE DATABAS, P1
CRAGG BG, 1975, BRAIN, V98, P81
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FRISCHKNECHT PM, 1995, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V2, P56
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1996, BRAIN MAPPING METHOD, P363
FRISTON KJ, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P218
FRISTON KJ, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P7591
FRISTON KJ, 2001, BRAIN RES BULL, V54, P275
FRISTON KJ, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V19, P1273
HILGETAG CC, 1996, SCIENCE, V271, P776
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P91
HILGETAG CC, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL NEUROA, P295
HORWITZ B, 1984, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V4, P484
JOUVE B, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P28
KAMPER L, 2002, NEUROSCIENCE DATABAS, P155
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KOTTER R, 2001, ANAT EMBRYOL, V204, P333
KOTTER R, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P741
KOTTER R, 2002, COMPUTATIONAL NEUROA, P359
MATELLI M, 1985, J COMP NEUROL, V338, P125
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P655
MILO R, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P824
MURRE JMJ, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V73, P529
PASSINGHAM RE, 2002, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V3, P606
PAUS T, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, R37
PETRIDES M, 1994, HDB NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V9, P17
PETRONI F, 2001, NEUROREPORT, V12, P2753
RIZZOLATTI G, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V106, P283
RIZZOLATTI G, 1998, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V21, P188
ROCKLAND KS, 1979, BRAIN RES, V179, P3
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P277
SPORNS O, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P127
SPORNS O, 2002, NEUROSCIENCE DATABAS, P171
STEPHAN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P111
STEPHAN KE, 2001, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V356, P1159
TONONI G, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P474
WALKER E, 1940, J COMP NEUROL, V98, P59
WATTS DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440
WHITE JG, 1986, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V314, P1
WILLIAMS RW, 2000, MOUSE BRAIN DEV, P21
YOUNG MP, 1992, NATURE, V358, P152
YOUNG MP, 1993, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V352, P13
YOUNG MP, 1994, REV NEUROSCI, V5, P227
YOUNG MP, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P147
ZEKI S, 1988, NATURE, V335, P311
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
58
NOV
2003
16
9
1261
1275
ISI:000186803400003
P
J
T
A McKeown, MJ
U Hansen, LK
Sejnowski, TJ
T
Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what
I
S
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY
O
A Many sources of fluctuation contribute to the functional magnetic resonanc
B complicating attempts to infer those changes that are truly related to bra
of analysis of fMRI data that test the time course of each voxel against a hypot
methods, such as independent component analysis and clustering, attempt to
the data. This exploratory approach can be revealing when the brain activa
beforehand, such as with complex stimuli and internal shifts of activation
an easily specified sensory or motor event. These methods can be further im
knowledge regarding the temporal and spatial extent of brain activation.
C ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
R ATTIAS H, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P1373
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BARTELS A, 2000, EUR J NEUROSCI, V12, P172
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P240
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BELL AJ, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P1129
BISWAL BB, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P265
BROWN GD, 2001, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V24, P54
BUCHANAN J, 2002, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
BUCKNER RL, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P373
CALHOUN V, 2003, P 4 INT S ICA2003, P281
CALHOUN VD, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P43
CALHOUN VD, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V14, P140
CALHOUN VD, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1080
CALHOUN VD, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V16, P158
CARDOSO JF, 1993, IEE PROC-F, V140, P362
CARROLL TJ, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P1007
CASTELOBRANCO M, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P13914
CORDES D, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P305
DUANN JR, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P823
ESPOSITO F, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V16, P146
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FORMISANO E, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V49, P241
FRIMAN O, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P454
FRISTON KJ, 1996, BRAIN MAPPING METHOD, P363
FRISTON KJ, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P373
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GU H, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1432
GUSNARD DA, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P685
HANSEN LK, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P534
HANSEN LK, 2000, ADV INDEPENDENT COMP, P165
HARTVIG NV, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V11, P233
HOEJENSOERENSEN P, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V49, P213
HYVARINEN A, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P626
HYVARINEN A, 2001, INDEPENDENT COMPONEN
JENKINSON M, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P825
JIANG HY, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V47, P818
JUNG TP, 2001, P IEEE, V89, P1107
LACONTE S, 2003, NEUROIMAGE, V18, P10
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
LEE TW, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P417
LEE TW, 2000, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V22, P1
LIAO R, 2002, 2002 IEEE INT S BIOM, P765
LU W, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V50, P271
LUKIC AS, 2002, IEEE INT S BIOM IM, P839
MCINTOSH AR, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P571
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P803
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P375
MCKEOWN MJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P24
MCKEOWN MJ, 2002, J NEUROSCI METH, V118, P103
MEGALOOIKONOMOU V, 2000, STAT METHODS MED RES, V9, P359
MITRA PP, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V37, P511
MITRA PP, 1999, BIOPHYS J, V76, P691
MOLGEDEY L, 1994, PHYS REV LETT, V72, P3634
MONTAGUE PR, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P1159
MORITZ CH, 2003, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V18, P111
MOSER E, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1102
MURAKI S, 2001, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V7, P265
MYERS RH, 1986, CLASSICAL MODERN REG
NIELSON KA, 2002, PSYCHOL AGING, V17, P56
NYBAKKEN GE, 2002, NEURORADIOLOGY, V44, P403
PETERSEN KS, 2000, P INT WORKSH IND COM, P615
PURDON PL, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P912
QUIGLEY MA, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P49
SEIFRITZ E, 2002, SCIENCE, V297, P1706
SMITH AM, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P526
STONE JV, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P407
STONE JV, 2002, TRENDS COGN SCI, V6, P59
SUZUKI K, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V15, P54
SVENSEN M, 2002, NEUROIMAGE 1, V16, P551
THOMAS CG, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1521
WOODS RP, 1998, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V22, P139
YEE SH, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P17
ZARAHN E, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P179
ZEKI S, 2003, CEREB CORTEX, V13, P189
ZIEHE A, 1998, P INT C ART NEUR NET, P675
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
78
OCT
2003
13
5
620
P
E
629
P
U
ISI:000186532000018
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Salek-Haddadi, A
U Friston, KJ
Lemieux, L
Fish, DR
T
Studying spontaneous EEG activity with fMRI
I
S
BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
O
A The multifaceted technological challenge of acquiring simultaneous EEG-corr
B met and the potential exists for mapping electrophysiological activity with
resolution. Work has already begun on studying a host of spontaneous EEG pheno
and sleep patterns to epileptiform discharges and seizures, with far reach
However, the transformation of EEG data into linear models suitable for voxel
testing is central to the endeavour. This in turn is predicated upon a num
the manner in which the generators of EEG phenomena may engender changes in th
(BOLD) signal. Furthermore, important limitations are posed by a set of co
'paradigmless fMRI'. Here, these issues are assembled and explored to provid
and unresolved questions, with an emphasis on applications in epilepsy. (C)
reserved.
C ABRAHAM K, 1958, ELECTROENCPH CLIN NE, V10, P447
R AGUIRRE GK, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P302
AGUIRRE GK, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P360
AJMONEMARSAN C, 1958, TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEP, P78
ALARCON G, 1994, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V57, P435
ALLEN PJ, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P229
ALLEN PJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P230
ANDERSSON JLR, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P903
ARCHER JS, 2003, EPILEPSIA, V44, P200
ARCHER JS, 2003, NEUROLOGY, V60, P415
ARTHURS OJ, 2000, NEUROSCIENCE, V101, P803
ARTHURS OJ, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P27
ASTRUP J, 1981, STROKE, V12, P726
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUDEWIG J, 2001, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V112, P1196
BAUDEWIG J, 2001, NEUROREPORT, V12, P3543
BAUMGARTNER C, 1995, NEUROLOGY, V45, P118
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BENAR CG, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1182
BINDER JR, 1999, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V11, P80
BITTAR RG, 1999, EPILEPSIA, V40, P170
BLUME WT, 1993, ANN NEUROL, V34, P703
BOHNING DE, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V11, P569
BONMASSAR G, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V14, P108
BONMASSAR G, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P1127
BONVENTO G, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P359
BORN AP, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V17, P1325
BREIER JI, 1997, NEUROLOGY, V48, P1047
BRUEHL C, 1998, EPILEPSIA, V39, P1235
BRUHN H, 1994, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V14, P742
BUCKNER RL, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P14878
BUCKNER RL, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P163
BURGESS A, 1993, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V86, P219
BUXTON RB, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P855
CHAWLA D, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P1389
CHIH CP, 2001, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V24, P573
CHUNG MY, 1991, EPILEPSIA, V32, P195
COHEN D, 1990, ANN NEUROL, V28, P811
CONNELLY A, 1995, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P1233
COOPER R, 1965, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V18, P217
CUFFIN BN, 1991, ANN NEUROL, V29, P132
CZISCH M, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P251
DALE AM, 2000, NEURON, V26, P55
DALE AM, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V11, P202
DASILVA FHL, 1997, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V26, P237
DAVIS LM, 1999, EPILEPSY RES, V35, P95
DECURTIS M, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7543
DECURTIS M, 2001, EUR J NEUROSCI, V14, P174
DECURTIS M, 2001, PROG NEUROBIOL, V63, P541
DESPOSITO M, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P6
DETRE JA, 1995, ANN NEUROL, V38, P618
DETRE JA, 1996, EPILEPSIA, V37, P657
DEVINSKY O, 1989, NEUROLOGY, V39, P527
DEVLIN JT, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P589
DEWIT H, 1991, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V5, P33
DEZWART JA, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V48, P1011
DIEKMANN V, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V106, P297
DISBROW EA, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P9718
DREIER JP, 1995, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V15, P914
DUCHENE M, 2001, NEUROIMAGE S 2, V13, S788
DUNCAN JS, 1997, BRAIN 2, V120, P339
EBERSOLE JS, 1990, BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, V3, P21
EBERSOLE JS, 1994, ACTA NEUROL SCAND S, V152, P20
EBERSOLE JS, 1997, EPILEPSY COMPREHENSI
EBERSOLE JS, 1997, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V14, P470
EMERSON RG, 1995, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V94, P338
ENGEL J, 1993, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V10, P90
FINK GR, 1996, J NEUROL SCI, V137, P28
FORSTER A, 1982, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V56, P453
FRAHM J, 1994, NMR BIOMED, V7, P45
FRANCK G, 1989, SEMIN NEUROL, V9, P307
FRISTON K, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P135
FRISTON KJ, 1991, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V11, P690
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P165
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
FRISTON KJ, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P346
FRISTON KJ, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P41
FRISTON KJ, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P607
FRISTON KJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P466
FRISTON KJ, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P215
FUCHS M, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V107, P93
GAILLARD WD, 1995, NEUROLOGY, V45, P1841
GLOOR P, 1985, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V2, P327
GOLDMAN RI, 2000, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V111, P1974
GOLDMAN RI, 2002, NEUROREPORT, V13, P2487
GORNOTEMPINI ML, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P136
GOTMAN J, 1985, ANN NEUROL, V17, P597
GOTMAN J, 1989, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V72, P7
GRISAR T, 1999, ADV NEUROL, V79, P591
GROOTOONK S, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P49
HAJNAL JV, 1994, MAGNET RESON MED, V31, P283
HALLET M, 1979, EPILEPSY COMPREHENSI
HALLETT M, 2000, NATURE, V406, P147
HARDER DR, 2002, NEWS PHYSIOL SCI, V17, P27
HEEGER DJ, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P631
HILL RA, 1999, EPILEPSIA, V40, P912
HOCHMAN DW, 1995, SCIENCE, V270, P99
HOFFMANN A, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V44, P791
HORWITZ B, 2002, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V17, P1
HUANGHELLINGER FR, 1995, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P13
HUETTEL SA, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P967
HUGHES JR, 1989, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V6, P207
HUPPERTZ HJ, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P15
IANNETTI GD, 2002, NEUROLOGY, V58, P976
IVES JR, 1993, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V87, P417
JACKSON GD, 1994, NEUROLOGY, V44, P850
JAGER L, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V223, P860
JAMES W, 1890, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL, V1
JENSEN MS, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V77, P1224
JOSEPHS O, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9
JOSEPHS O, 1999, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V354, P1215
JUEPTNER M, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P148
KASTRUP A, 1999, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V19, P1066
KASTRUP A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P675
KIM B, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P964
KLEINSCHMIDT A, 1995, STROKE, V26, P106
KLEINSCHMIDT A, 1999, NMR BIOMED, V12, P286
KRAKOW K, 1999, BRAIN 9, V122, P1679
KRAKOW K, 1999, EPILEPSIA, V40, P1459
KRAKOW K, 2000, ADV NEUROL, V83, P187
KRAKOW K, 2000, EPILEPSY RES, V42, P1
KRAKOW K, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P10
KRAKOW K, 2001, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V3, P67
KRAKOW K, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P502
KRINGS T, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V54, P524
KUHL DE, 1980, ANN NEUROL, V8, P348
KUSCHINSKY W, 1972, CIRC RES, V31, P240
KUSCHINSKY W, 1978, PHYSIOL REV, V58, P656
LAZEYRAS F, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P177
LAZEYRAS F, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V55, P1677
LEE AT, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V33, P745
LEIDERMAN DB, 1991, EPILEPSIA, V32, P417
LEMIEUX L, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V38, P943
LEMIEUX L, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P1097
LEMIEUX L, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P780
LEMIEUX L, 2003, RADIOLOGY, V226, P922
LINDAUER U, 1999, AM J PHYSIOL-HEART C, V277, H799
LIU TT, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P759
LLINAS RR, 1988, SCIENCE, V242, P1654
LOGOTHETIS NK, 2001, NATURE, V412, P150
LOPESDASILVA F, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V79, P81
LOVBLAD KO, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V53, P2193
LUDERS HO, 1993, SURG TREATMENT EPILE, P137
MAGISTRETTI PJ, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P496
MAKEIG S, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P690
MANDEVILLE JB, 1999, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V19, P679
MATSUDA T, 2002, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V56, P289
MATTHEW E, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P2775
MCCARRON JG, 1990, AM J PHYSIOL, V259, H902
MCCULLOCH J, 1982, PFLUGERS ARCH, V393, P95
MCGONIGLE DJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P708
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MERLET I, 1999, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V110, P1013
MICHEL CM, 1999, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V16, P239
MIEZIN FM, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P735
MOROCZ IA, 2003, NEUROLOGY, V60, P705
MOSHER JC, 1993, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V86, P303
MUNARI C, 1994, ACTA NEUROL SCAND S, V152, P56
NAKASATO N, 1994, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V91, P171
NIEDERMEYER E, 1972, EUR NEUROL, V7, P119
NIEDERMEYER E, 1997, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V26, P31
NIEDERMEYER E, 1999, ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAP
NUNEZ PL, 1981, ELECT FIELDS BRAIN N
NUNEZ PL, 1995, NEOCORTICAL DYNAMICS
NUNEZ PL, 2000, BRAIN TOPOGR, V13, P79
NUNEZ PL, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P125
OGAWA S, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P9868
OJEMANN JG, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P156
PALMINI A, 1995, ANN NEUROL, V37, P476
PATEL MR, 1999, AM J NEURORADIOL, V20, P1916
PAULSON OB, 1987, SCIENCE, V237, P896
PETERSSON KM, 1999, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V354, P1239
PETERSSON KM, 1999, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V354, P1261
PFURTSCHELLER G, 1977, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V42, P817
PHILLIPS C, 2002, NEUROIMAGE 1, V16, P678
PLONSEY R, 1963, IEEE T BIOMED ENG, V10, P9
PORTAS CM, 2000, NEURON, V28, P991
POSTLE BR, 2000, BRAIN RES PROTOC, V5, P57
PRINCE DA, 1986, ADV NEUROL, V44, P275
REZAI AR, 1999, J NEUROSURG, V90, P583
REZAI AR, 2002, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V15, P241
ROBSON MD, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P185
ROSENOW F, 2001, BRAIN 9, V124, P1683
ROSTRUP E, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P87
SALEKHADDADI A, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P32
SALEKHADDADI A, 2003, ANN NEUROL, V53, P663
SAMMARITANO M, 1991, NEUROLOGY, V41, P290
SCANNELL JW, 1999, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V266, P875
SCHACTER DL, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P259
SCHOMER DL, 2000, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V17, P43
SEECK M, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V106, P508
SIBSON NR, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P316
SNEAD OC, 1995, ANN NEUROL, V37, P146
STEFAN H, 1994, ACTA NEUROL SCAND S, V152, P83
STONE JV, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V15, P407
SYMMS MR, 1999, PHYS MED BIOL, V44, P161
THEODORE WH, 1986, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V6, P315
THEODORE WH, 1986, NEUROLOGY, V36, P60
THEODORE WH, 1989, ANN NEUROL, V25, P516
TIIHONEN J, 1989, NEUROSCIENCE, V32, P793
TIIHONEN J, 1991, NEUROSCI LETT, V129, P303
TORRE JLF, 1999, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V67, P51
TRONNIER VM, 1999, NEUROSURGERY, V44, P118
TSENG SY, 1995, MED ENG PHYS, V17, P64
TURNER R, 2002, NEUROIMAGE, V16, P1062
VAZQUEZ AL, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P108
VILLRINGER A, 1995, CEREBROVAS BRAIN MET, V7, P240
VONSTEIN A, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P14748
WALDVOGEL D, 2000, NATURE, V406, P995
WARACH S, 1996, NEUROLOGY, V47, P89
WONG PKH, 1989, BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, V2, P31
WONG PKH, 1991, BRAIN TOPOGR, V4, P105
ZARAHN E, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P768
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
213
SEP
2003
43
1
110
133
ISI:000186317100008
S
Knoblauch, A
Optimal matrix compression yields storage capacity 1 for binary Willshaw a
ARTIFICAIL NEURAL NETWORKS AND NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING - ICAN/ICONIP
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
The classical binary Willshaw model of associative memory has an asymptoti
approximate to 0.7 which exceeds the capacities of other (e.g., Hopfield-l
its practical use is severely limited, since the asymptotic capacity is reach
n of neurons and for sparse patterns where the number kappa of one-entries
value kappa(opt) (n) (typically kappa(opt) = log n). In this work I demonst
of the binary memory matrix by a Huffman or Golomb code can increase the a
1. Moreover, it turns out that this happens for a very broad range of kappa bei
kappa constant) or moderately-sparse (e.g., kappa = rootn). A storage capa
already achieved for practical numbers of neurons.
C BENTZ HJ, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P289
R COVER TM, 1991, ELEMENTS INFORMATION
GOLOMB S, 1966, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V12, P399
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPFIELD JJ, 1986, SCIENCE, V233, P625
HUFFMAN DA, 1952, P IRE, V40, P1098
KNOBLAUCH A, UNPUB WILLSHAW ASS M
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P168
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V2, P97
RACHKOVSKIJ DA, 2001, NEURAL COMPUT, V13, P411
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
STEINBUCH K, 1961, KYBERNETIK, V1, P36
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
17
R
P
2003
Y
V
2714
L
B
325
P
E
332
P
U
ISI:000185378100039
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Raffone, A
van Leeuwen, C
Dynamic synchronization and chaos in an associative neural network with mu
CHAOS
Associative memory dynamics in neural networks are generally based on attr
fixed-point attractors works if only one memory pattern is retrieved at th
simultaneous retrieval of more than one pattern. Stable phase-locking of p
cycle attractors leads to incorrect feature bindings if the simultaneously
of their features. We investigate retrieval dynamics of multiple active pat
model neurons. Several memory patterns are kept simultaneously active and
a dynamic itinerant synchronization between neurons. Neurons representing sh
synchronization between patterns, thus multiplexing their binding relation
mechanism for self-organized readout or decoding of memory pattern coheren
potentiation and short-term depression of synaptic weights. (C) 2003 Ameri
C ABELES M, 1991, CORTICONICS NEURAL C
R AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
AMIT DJ, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V18, P617
ANDERSON JR, 1990, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL IT
ARBIB MA, 1998, NEURAL ORG STRUCTURE
BADDELEY A, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P556
BAHRICK HP, 1984, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V113, P1
BECHTEL W, 2002, CONNECTIONISM MIND P
CASTELOBRANCO M, 2000, NATURE, V405, P685
CAVE KR, 1999, PSYCHON B REV, V6, P204
COWAN N, 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P87
DAUCE E, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V887, P315
DIESMANN M, 1999, NATURE, V402, P529
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1992, INFORMATION PROCESSI, P385
ENGEL AK, 1992, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V15, P218
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FODOR JA, 1988, COGNITION, V28, P3
FUJII H, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1303
GEORGOPOULOS AP, 1989, SCIENCE, V243, P234
GILDEN DL, 2001, PSYCHOL REV, V108, P33
GONG P, 2003, NEUROSCI LETT, V336, P33
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
GRAY CM, 1999, NEURON, V24, P31
HANSEL D, 1992, PHYS REV LETT, V68, P718
HINDMARSH JL, 1984, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V221, P87
HOPFIELD J, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V9, P2554
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P31
KAASPETERSEN C, 1987, CHAOS BIOL SYSTEMS, P183
KANEKO K, 1990, PHYSICA D, V41, P137
KANEKO K, 2002, PHYS REV E, V66
KONIG P, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P155
LI Z, 1989, BIOL CYBERN, V61, P379
LISMAN JE, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1512
LUCK SJ, 1997, NATURE, V390, P279
MILNOR J, 1985, COMMUN MATH PHYS, V99, P177
MURRE JMJ, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P55
RAFFONE A, 2001, CONNECT SCI, V13, P349
RAFFONE A, 2001, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V13, P766
SHADLEN MN, 1999, NEURON, V24, P67
SHARKEY AJC, 2002, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU
SKARDA CA, 1987, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V10, P161
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
SPORNS O, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P7265
TSUDA I, 1984, PROG THEOR PHYS SUPP, V79, P241
TSUDA I, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P313
TSUDA I, 1993, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V16, P475
TSUDA I, 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P793
VAADIA E, 1995, NATURE, V373, P515
VANLEEUWEN C, 1997, J MATH PSYCHOL, V41, P319
VANLEEUWEN C, 2001, COGNITIVE PROCESSING, V2, P67
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1981, 812 MAX PLANCK I BIO
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1999, NEURON, V24, P95
WANG D, 1990, NEUR COMP, V2, P94
WANG DL, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P805
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
56
SEP
2003
13
3
1090
1104
ISI:000184992600033
P
J
T
A Lansner, A
U Fransen, E
Sandberg, A
T
Cell assembly dynamics in detailed and abstract attractor models of cortic
I
S
THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES
O
A During the last few decades we have seen a convergence among ideas and hyp
B principles underlying human memory. Hebb's now more than fifty years old c
plasticity and cell assemblies, formalized mathematically as attractor neura
the most viable and productive theoretical frameworks. It suggests plausib
aspects of active memory like perceptual completion, reconstruction and ri
We review the biological plausibility of these theories and discuss some cri
associative memory functionality in the light of simulation studies of mod
properties. The focus is on memory properties and dynamics of networks mod
minicolumns and hypercolumns. Biophysical compartmental models demonstrate a
cell assembly operations with fast convergence and low firing rates. Using
reasonable relative connection densities and amplitudes. An abstract attra
systems level psychological phenomena seen in human memory experiments as t
effects.
We conclude that there is today considerable substance in Hebb's theory of cel
network formulations, and that they have contributed to increasing our underst
memory function.
The criticism raised with regard to biological and psychological plausibil
capacity, slow retrieval etc has largely been disproved. Rather, this paradi
from new experimental data as well as computational modeling.
C AMARI SI, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P451
R AMIT DJ, 1991, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V2, P259
AMIT DJ, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V18, P617
BAO JX, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P969
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, THEORETICAL APPROACH, P171
CARANDINI M, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P8621
CARTLING B, 1993, INT J NEURAL SYST, V4, P129
CARTLING B, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P247
CONNORS BW, 1990, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V13, P99
EICHENBAUM H, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P993
FRANSEN E, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P271
FRANSEN E, 1996, TRITANAP9628 ROYAL I
FRANSEN E, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P235
FREEMAN WJ, 1985, BRAIN RES REV, V10, P147
FUSTER JM, 1982, J NEUROSCI, V2, P361
FUSTER JM, 1995, MEMORY CEREBREAL COR
GILBERT CD, 1990, COLD SPRING HARB SYM, V55, P663
GOLDMANRAKIC PS, 1995, NEURON, V14, P477
GRAY CM, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P1698
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HERTZ J, 1991, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HIRSCH JA, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1800
HOPFIELD JJ, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P3088
HUBEL DH, 1977, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V198, P1
JOHANSSON C, 2001, CAPACITY STUDY BAYES
LANSNER A, 1989, INT J NEURAL SYSTEMS, V1, P77
LANSNER A, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P105
LANSNER A, 1996, INT J NEURAL SYST, V7, P115
LANSNER A, 2001, FUNCTIONALITY PERFOR
LEVAY S, 1976, BRAIN RES, V113, P1
LEVY WB, 1979, BRAIN RES, V175, P233
MACGREGOR RJ, 1978, BIOL CYBERN, V28, P121
MARTINEZ JL, 1991, LEARNING MEMORY BIOL, P149
MCCORMICK DA, 1985, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V54, P782
MCGAUGH JL, 2000, SCIENCE, V287, P248
MERZENICH MM, 1984, J COMP NEUROL, V224, P591
MILLER KD, 1996, MODELS NEURAL NETWOR, V3, P55
MILNER PM, 1957, PSYCHOL REV, V64, P242
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1957, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V20, P408
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1998, PERCEPTUAL NEUROSCIE
NADAL JP, 1986, EUROPHYS LETT, V1, P535
OLSHAUSEN BA, 1997, VISION RES, V37, P3311
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P280
QUINLAN P, 1991, CONNECTIONISM PSYCHO
ROCHESTER N, 1956, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V2, P80
SANDBERG A, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P867
SANDBERG A, 2002, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V13, P179
SANDBERG A, 2002, NEUROCOMPUTING, V44, P615
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
STERNBERG S, 1966, SCIENCE, V153, P652
THORPE S, 1989, BIOL CONSTRAINTS CON
THORPE S, 1996, NATURE, V381, P520
TRAUB RD, 1996, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V493, P471
VONRESTORFF H, 1933, PSYCHOL FORSCH, V18, P299
WAHLGREN N, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P433
WALLEN P, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V61, P759
WICKENS J, 1995, CELLULAR MODELS REIN, P187
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, MACHINE LEARNING, V5
YEN SC, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P609
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
61
MAY
2003
122
1
19
36
ISI:000183327000003
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
Synchronization of neuronal assemblies in reciprocally connected cortical
THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES
To investigate scene segmentation in the visual system we present a model
visual areas comprising spiking neurons. The peripheral area P is modeled
cortex, while the central area C is modeled as an associative memory represent
to Hebbian learning. Without feedback from area C, spikes corresponding to
P are synchronized only locally (slow state). Feedback from C can induce fast
of synchronization ranges (fast state). Presenting a super-position of sev
segmentation happens on a time scale of hundreds of milliseconds by altern
fast state, where neurons representing the same object are simultaneously
our simulation results to various phenomena observed in neurophysiological
stimulus-dependent synchronization of fast oscillations, synchronization on
activity, and attention-dependent neural activity.
C ABELES M, 1982, LOCAL CORTICAL CIRCU
R AERTSEN A, 1994, PHYSICA D, V75, P103
ANDERSON J, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P617
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, LECTURE NOTES BIOMAT, V21, P171
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
CRICK F, 1990, SEMINARS NEUROSCIENC, V2, P263
ECKHORN R, 1994, PROG BRAIN RES, V102, P405
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P510
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P151
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P168
KNOBLAUCH A, 2003, IN PRESS NEUROCOMPUT
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MILLER R, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA
NELSON JI, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P21
NEUMANN H, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P425
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
POPPEL E, 1994, INT REV NEUROBIOL, V37, P185
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, NEURON, V24, P19
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SWADLOW H, 2000, INFORMAITON FLOW NEO, P131
TREISMAN A, 1998, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V353, P1295
TSODYKS M, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1943
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P161
WENNEKERS T, 2000, CELL ASSEMBLIES ASSO, P251
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
32
MAY
2003
122
1
37
54
ISI:000183327000004
J
Pulvermuller, F
Sequence detectors as a basis of grammar in the brain
THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES
Grammar processing may build upon serial-order mechanisms known from non-hum
to that underlying direction-sensitive movement detection in arthropods an
selective for sequences of words, thus yielding grammatical sequence detec
Sensitivity to the order of neuronal events arises from unequal connection
specific neural units and a third element, the sequence detector. This mechan
on the dynamics of the neural units, can operate at the single neuron leve
level of neuronal ensembles as well. Due to the repeated occurrence of sequen
the sequence-sensitive elements become more firmly established and, by sub
strings, a process called auto-associative substitution learning (AASL) is
neuronal counterparts of the string elements involved in the substitution pro
thereby providing a brain basis of what can be described linguistically as
of grammar. A network of sequence detectors may constitute grammar circuits
a separate set of mechanisms establishing temporary binding and recursion
C ABELES M, 1993, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V70, P1629
R BARLOW HB, 1964, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V173, P377
BARLOW HB, 1965, J PHYSL, V178, P477
BIENENSTOCK E, 1996, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V90, P251
BLOOMFIELD L, 1933, LANGUAGE
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, LECTURE NOTES BIOMAT, V21, P171
BRAITENBERG V, 1997, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V20, P229
BRAITENBERG V, 1998, CORTEX STAT GEOMETRY
BRAITENBERG V, 2001, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V10, P71
CHOMSKY N, 1963, HDB MATH PSYCHOL, V2, P323
CRESPIREGHIZZI S, 2001, COMPUT LANG, V27, P105
EGELHAAF M, 1989, J OPT SOC AM A, V6, P1070
FUSTER JM, 1995, MEMORY CEREBRAL CORT
FUSTER JM, 1997, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V20, P451
HARE M, 1995, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V10, P601
HARRIS ZS, 1951, STRUCTURAL LINGUISTI
HAUSER MD, 2002, SCIENCE, V298, P1569
HECK D, 1993, NEUROSCI LETT, V157, P95
HECK D, 2002, HUM MOVEMENT SCI, V21, P411
HUBEL D, 1995, EYE BRAIN VISION
JOSHI AK, 1990, LANG COGNITIVE PROC, V5, P1
KLEENE SC, 1956, AUTOMATA STUDIES, P3
MCCULLOCH WS, 1943, B MATH BIOPHYS, V5, P115
MILNER PM, 1957, PSYCHOL REV, V64, P242
MILNER PM, 1999, AUTONOMOUS BRAIN
PAGE MPA, 1998, PSYCHOL REV, V105, P761
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES
PALM G, 1993, BRAIN THEORY SPATIOT, P261
PINKER S, 2002, TRENDS COGN SCI, V6, P472
PRUT Y, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P2857
PULVERMILLER F, 2003, NEUROSCIENCE LANGUAG
PULVERMULLER F, 1993, BRAIN THEORY SPATIOT, P131
PULVERMULLER F, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, R1
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P253
PULVERMULLER F, 2002, PROG NEUROBIOL, V67, P85
REICHARDT W, 1959, Z NATURFORSCH B, V14, P674
RUMELHART DE, 1987, MECH LANGUAGE ACQUIS
SAKURAI Y, 1999, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V23, P785
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
VARJU D, 1967, Z NATURFORSCH B, V22, P1343
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WILLSHAW DJ, 1972, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V182, P233
YOUNG MP, 1995, ANAL CORTICAL CONNEC
ZIPSER D, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P3406
N
45
R
P MAY
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
2003
122
1
87
103
ISI:000183327000007
J
Baudelet, C
Gallez, B
Cluster analysis of BOLD fMRI time series in tumors to study the heterogen
to treatment
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
BOLD-contrast functional MRI (fMRI) has been used to assess the evolution o
flow after treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate K-means-based clus
data-driven method. The advantage of this approach is that it can be used t
the need for prior knowledge concerning the hemodynamic response function.
to illustrate different types of BOLD fMRI response inside tumors: the firs
challenge with carbogen, and the second after pharmacological modulation o
flunarizine. To improve the efficiency of the clustering, a power density sp
to isolate voxels for which signal changes did not originate from noise or
presented here can be used to assess hemodynamic response to treatment, an
of the tumor with heterogeneous responses. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
C ALHALLAQ HA, 2000, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V47, P481
R BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUDELET C, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V48, P980
BAUMGARTNER R, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1094
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BISWAL BB, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P265
DEWHIRST MW, 1992, RADIAT RES, V132, P61
FADILI MJ, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P160
FENTON BM, 1992, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V22, P447
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
GALLEZ B, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P627
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HARTIGAN JA, 1975, CLUSTERING ALGORITHM, P84
HOWE FA, 2001, NMR BIOMED, V14, P497
JARMASZ M, 2002, ARTIF INTELL MED, V25, P45
JORDAN BF, 2000, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V48, P565
LAI SH, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P827
LANDUYT W, 2001, EUR RADIOL, V11, P2332
MILAS L, 1974, CANCER RES, V34, P61
OGAWA S, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P9868
PELLER M, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P799
PROAKIS JG, 1988, INTRO DIGITAL SIGNAL, P795
QUIGLEY MA, 2002, AM J NEURORADIOL, V23, P49
ROBINSON SP, 1997, BRIT J CANCER, V75, P1000
SHAN SQ, 1997, BRIT J CANCER, V76, P429
SMITH AM, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P526
SONG CW, 1998, BLOOD PERFUSION MICR, P193
YEE SH, 2002, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V20, P17
ZLOTECKI RA, 1995, MICROVASC RES, V50, P429
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
31
JUN
2003
49
6
985
990
ISI:000183271200002
J
Doboli, S
Minai, AA
Network capacity analysis for latent attractor computation
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
A Attractor networks have been one of the most successful paradigms in neura
B used as models of computation in the nervous system. Recently, we proposed
attractors' where attractors embedded in a recurrent network via Hebbian learn
response to external input rather than becoming manifest themselves. This a
context-sensitive internal codes in complex situations. Latent attractors
explaining computations within the hippocampus-a brain region of fundamenta
spatial learning.
Latent attractor networks are a special case of associative memory networks. T
of a two-layer recurrent network with attractors stored in the recurrent conne
learning rule. The firing in both layers is competitive-K winners take all
allowed to fire, K, is smaller than the size of the active set of the store
of latent attractor networks depends on the number of such attractors that
In this paper, we use signal-to-noise methods developed for standard assoc
a theoretical and computational analysis of the capacity and dynamics of la
is an important first step in making latent attractors a viable tool in the rep
The method developed here leads to numerical estimates of capacity limits an
networks. The technique represents a general approach to analyse standard ass
competitive firing.
The theoretical analysis is based on estimates of the dendritic sum distri
approximation. Because of the competitive firing property, the capacity re
numerically by iteratively computing the probability of erroneous firings. Th
the simple case analysis which accounts for the correlations between weigh
the detailed case analysis which includes also the temporal correlations b
and previous state. The latter case predicts better the dynamics of the netwo
spurious firing. The theoretical analysis also shows the influence of the
on the storage capacity.
C AMARI S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P63
R BATTAGLIA FP, 1998, PHYS REV E B, V58, P7738
BENGIO Y, 1994, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V5, P157
BENNETT MR, 1994, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V343, P167
BIBBIG A, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V66, P169
BIBBIG A, 1996, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V9, P145
BLISS TVP, 1973, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V232, P331
BLUM KI, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P85
BUCKINGHAM J, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P407
BUCKINGHAM J, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P441
DAHL D, 1985, EXP BRAIN RES, V59, P491
DOBOLI S, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P671
DOBOLI S, 1999, P COMP NEUR C CNS 99
DOBOLI S, 1999, P IJCNN 99 WASH DC
DOBOLI S, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P1009
DOBOLI S, 2000, P IJCNN 2000 COM IT
DOBOLI S, 2001, P IJCNN 2001 WASH DC
DOBOLI S, 2002, P IJCNN 2002 WASH DC
ELMAN JL, 1990, COGNITIVE SCI, V14, P179
FRASCONI P, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P120
FRASCONI P, 1996, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V7, P1521
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
GILES CL, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P393
GOLOMB D, 1990, PHYS REV A, V41, P1843
GRAHAM B, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P337
GRAHAM B, 1997, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V8, P35
GROSSBERG S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS NATU
HARLEY C, 1989, BRAIN RES BULL, V22, P643
HASSELMO ME, 1995, J NEUROSCI 2, V15, P5249
HERTZ J, 1990, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HILL AJ, 1981, EXP NEUROL, V74, P204
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
JORDAN MI, 1986, P 8 ANN C COGN SCI S, P531
KITCHIGINA V, 1997, EUR J NEUROSCI, V9, P41
KOHONEN T, 1989, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
KUDRIMOTI HS, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P4090
LEUNG CS, 1995, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V25, P1414
LEVY WB, 1979, BRAIN RES, V175, P233
LEVY WB, 1989, COMPUTATIONAL MODELS, P243
LEVY WB, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P579
LEVY WB, 1996, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V7, P371
LIN T, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P861
LIN TN, 1996, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V7, P1329
LUKASHIN AV, 1993, BIOL CYBERN, V69, P517
MARKUS EJ, 1994, COGN NEUR SOC ABSTR, V1, P91
MARR D, 1971, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V262, P23
MCNAUGHTON BL, 1987, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V10, P408
MEHTA MR, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P8918
MINAI A, 1994, INNS WORLD C NEUR NE, V4, P176
MINAI AA, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P667
MINAI AA, 1998, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, P587
MOZER MC, 1992, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V4, P275
MULLER RU, 1987, J NEUROSCI, V7, P1935
MULLER RU, 1987, J NEUROSCI, V7, P1951
OKEEFE J, 1971, BRAIN RES, V34, P171
OKEEFE J, 1978, HIPPOCAMPUS COGNITIV
OKEEFE J, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V68, P1
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1991, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V2, P97
PATTON PE, 1995, HIPPOCAMPUS, V5, P245
PEARLMUTTER BA, 1989, NEURAL COMPUT, V1, P263
QUIRK GJ, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P2008
REDISH AD, 1998, NEURAL COMPUT, V10, P73
REISS M, 1991, NEURAL NETWORKS, V4, P773
ROLLS ET, 1989, COMPUTING NEURON, P125
SAMSONOVICH A, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P5900
SERVANSCHREIBER D, 1989, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V1, P643
SKAGGS WE, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V15, P811
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
TANILA H, 1999, HIPPOCAMPUS, V9, P235
TSODYKS M, 1995, INT J NEURAL SYS S, V6, P81
VOGEL DD, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P671
WILLIAMS RJ, 1989, NEURAL COMPUT, V1, P270
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WILSON MA, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P1055
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
76
MAY
2003
14
2
273
302
ISI:000183097100006
J
Wilson, RC
Hancock, ER
A study of pattern recovery in recurrent correlation associative memories
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
In this paper, we analyze the recurrent correlation associative memory (RCAM
This is an associative memory in which stored binary memory patterns are rec
rule. The update of the individual pattern-bits is controlled by an excita
its arguement the inner product between the stored memory patterns and the inp
is to analyze the dynamics of pattern recall when the input patterns are corr
unrestricted class. We make three contributions. First, we show how to ide
which maximizes the separation (the Fisher discriminant) between the uncorru
input pattern and the remaining patterns residing in the memory. Moreover,
function which gives maximum separation is exponential when the input bitdistribution. Our second contribution is to develop an expression for the e
probability on the input pattern after one iteration. We show how to identify
minimizes the bit-error probability. However, there is no closed-form soluti
must be recovered numerically. The relationship between the excitation fun
two different approaches is examined for a binomial distribution of bit-er
is to develop a semiempirical approach to the modeling of the dynamics of th
a numerical means of predicting the recall error rate of the memory. It also all
for the storage capacity for a given recall error rate.
C BURSHTEIN D, 1998, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V44, P861
R CASASENT D, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P687
CHEN ZY, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V3, P242
CHIUEH TD, 1990, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V2, P793
CHIUEH TD, 1991, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P275
CHIUEH TD, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P364
CHOU PA, 1988, NEURAL INFORMATION P, P184
ELEICE RJ, 1987, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V33, P461
FELLER W, 1971, INTRO PROBABILITY TH, V2, P257
GARDNER E, 1986, J PHYS A, V19, L1047
HANCOCK ER, 1990, PATTERN RECOGN, V23, P711
HANCOCK ER, 1998, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V19, P149
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
JAGOTA A, 1998, NEUROCOMPUTING, V19, P35
KANERVA P, 1988, SPARSE DISTRIBUTED M
LOWE M, 1999, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V45, P314
MAZZA C, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P593
MILUN D, 1993, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V14, P781
SHI HC, 1998, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V28, P511
SOMMER FT, 1998, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V9, P705
STEINBUCH K, 1961, KYBERNETIK, V1, P36
WANG CC, 1995, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V6, P492
WANG CC, 1995, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V6, P993
WANG CC, 1996, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V26, P733
WANG CC, 1998, IEE P-COMPUT DIG T, V145, P279
WANG CC, 1998, INFORM SCIENCES, V110, P179
WHITTLE P, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P1619
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
XU ZB, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P483
N
29
R
P
MAY
D
P
2003
Y
V
14
L
I
3
S
B
506
P
E
519
P
U
ISI:000182980300004
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Schaal, S
U Ijspeert, A
Billard, A
T
Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation
I
S
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGI
O
A Movement imitation requires a complex set of mechanisms that map an observ
B one's own movement apparatus. Relevant problems include movement recogniti
tracking, body correspondence, coordinate transformation from external to
observed against previously learned movement, resolution of redundant degr
unconstrained by the observation, suitable movement representations for imit
control, etc. All of these topics by themselves are active research proble
neurobiological sciences, such that their combination into a complete imitat
undertaking-indeed, one could argue that we need to understand the complet
a strategy to untangle the complexity of imitation, this paper will examin
computational point of view, i.e. we will review statistical and mathemati
suggested for tackling parts of the imitation problem, and discuss their m
underlying principles. Given the focus on action recognition of other contri
this paper will primarily emphasize the motor side of imitation, assuming
already identified important features of a demonstrated movement and create
information. Based on the formalization of motor control in terms of control
performance criteria, useful taxonomies of imitation learning can be gener
approaches and future research directions.
C ABOAF EW, 1989, P IEEE INT C ROB AUT, P331
R ALISSANDRAKIS A, 2002, IEEE T SYST MAN CY A, V32, P482
ARBIB MA, 1981, HDB PHYSL NERVOUS SY, V2, P1449
ARBIB MA, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P975
ARULAMPALAM S, 2002, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V50, P174
ATKESON C, 1997, MACH LEARN, P12
ATKESON CG, 1997, IEEE INT C ROB AUT, V2, P1706
BAILLIEUL J, 1990, P S APPL MATH AM MAT, V41, P49
BILLARD A, 2001, CYBERNET SYST, V32, P155
BILLARD A, 2001, IEEE INT C INT ROB S
BILLARD A, 2001, ROBOTICS AUTONOMOUS, V941, P1
BILLARD A, 2002, AM MATH SOC CENTR SE
BULLOCK D, 1993, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V5, P408
BYRNE RW, 1998, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V21, P667
BYRNE RW, 2003, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V358, P529
CACCIATORE TW, 1994, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V6, P719
CRAIG JJ, 1986, INTRO ROBOTICS
DAUTENHAHN K, 1995, ROBOT AUTON SYST, V16, P333
DAUTENHAHN K, 2002, IMITATION ANIMALS AR
DAYAN P, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P889
DEMIRIS J, 2002, IMITATION ANIMALS AR, P327
DEUTSCHER J, 2000, IEEE COMPUT VISION P
DILLMANN R, 1995, INT S INT ROB SYST S, P1
DSOUZA A, 2001, IEEE INT C INT ROB S
DUFAY B, 1984, INT J ROBOT RES, V3, P3
DYER P, 1970, COMPUTATION THEORY O
FAGG AH, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1277
GALLESE V, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P493
GRUDIC GZ, 1996, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P2962
GUENTHER FH, 1997, SELF ORG COMPUTATION, P102
HATSOPOULOS NG, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P567
HAYES G, 1994, P 2 INT S INT ROB SY, P198
HOVLAND GE, 1996, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P2706
IJSPEERT JA, 2002, IEEE INT C INT ROB S
IJSPEERT JA, 2002, INT C ROB AUT WASH D
IKEUCHI K, 1993, P IEEE INT C ROB AUT, V2, P688
KAWAMURA S, 1994, INT C AUT ROB COMP V, P183
KAWATO M, 1996, ATTENTION PERFORM, V16, P335
KAWATO M, 1999, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V9, P718
KUNIYOSHI Y, 1989, P 20 INT S IND ROB R, P119
KUNIYOSHI Y, 1994, IEEE T ROBOTIC AUTOM, V10, P799
LACQUANITI F, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P367
LEVAS A, 1984, INT C ROB AUT ALT GA, P413
LIN LJ, 1991, P 9 NAT C ART INT, V2, P781
LOZANOPEREZ T, 1982, ROBOT MOTION PLANNIN, P473
MATARIC MJ, 1998, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V7, P191
MELTZOFF AN, 1994, INFANT BEHAV DEV, V17, P83
MELTZOFF AN, 1997, EARLY DEV PARENTING, V6, P179
MIALL RC, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1265
MIYAMOTO H, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1281
MIYAMOTO H, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1331
NECHYBA MC, 1995, IEEE RSJ INT C INT R, V3, P314
NEHANIV CL, 1999, LEARNING ROBOTS INTE
OZTOP E, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P116
PAWELZIK K, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P340
PIAGET J, 1951, PLAY DREAMS IMITATIO
POOK PK, 1993, P IEEE INT C ROB AUT, V3, P913
RITTSCHER J, 2003, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V358, P475
RIZZOLATTI G, 1996, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V3, P131
RIZZOLATTI G, 1998, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V21, P188
SALTZMAN E, 1987, PSYCHOL REV, V94, P84
SAMMUT C, 1992, P 9 INT WORKSH MACH, P385
SCHAAL S, 1997, ADV NEUR IN, V9, P1040
SCHAAL S, 1999, TRENDS COGN SCI, V3, P233
SCHAAL S, 2000, P SPIE BOST MA 5 8 N, V4196, P30
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SEGRE AB, 1985, INT C ROB AUT, P555
SEGRE AM, 1988, KLUWER INT SERIES EN
STERNAD D, 1999, EXP BRAIN RES, V124, P118
SUTTON RS, 1909, REINFORCEMENT LEARNI
SUTTON RS, 1999, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V11
TOMASELLO M, 1993, CHILD DEV, V64, P1688
TUNG CP, 1995, IEEE RI INT C INT RO, V1, P1
VANESSEN DC, 1983, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V6, P370
WADA Y, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V73, P3
WEIGEND AS, 1995, INT J NEURAL SYST, V6, P373
WIDROW B, 1964, 1963 COMP INF SCI CO, P288
WOLPERT DM, 1997, TRENDS COGN SCI, V1, P209
WOLPERT DM, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1317
WOLPERT DM, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P338
WOLPERT DM, 2003, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V358, P593
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
81
MAR 29
2003
358
1431
537
547
ISI:000181940000010
P
J
T
A Fell, J
U Klaver, P
Elger, CE
Fernandez, G
T
I
S
O
A
B
The interaction of rhinal cortex and hippocampus in human declarative memo
REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES
Human declarative memory formation crucially depends on processes within th
These processes can be monitored in real-time by recordings from depth ele
of patients with epilepsy who undergo presurgical evaluation. In our studi
memorization task during depth EEG recording. Afterwards, the difference bet
(ERPs) corresponding to subsequently remembered versus forgotten words was a
revealed that successful memory encoding is characterized by an early process
within 300 ms following stimulus onset. This rhinal process precedes a hipp
about 200 ms later. Further investigation revealed that the rhinal process seem
preprocessing which supports memory formation, whereas the hippocampal proc
of an exclusively mnemonic operation. These studies yielded only indirect e
rhinal cortex and hippocampus. Direct evidence for a memory related coopera
however, has been found in a study analyzing so called gamma activity, EEG
This investigation showed that successful as opposed to unsuccessful memor
an initial enhancement of rhinal-hippocampal phase synchronization, which
desynchronization. Present knowledge about the function of phase synchronize
this phase coupling and decoupling initiates and later terminates communic
structures. Phase synchronized rhinal-hippocampal gamma activity may, more
synaptic modifications and thus provide an initial step of declarative mem
level.
C ABBOTT LF, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI S, V3, P1178
R AMARAL DG, 1989, NEUROSCIENCE, V31, P571
AMARAL DG, 1990, HUMAN NERVOUS SYSTEM, P711
BECK H, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P7080
BRESSLER SL, 1987, BRAIN RES, V409, P285
BREWER JB, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1185
BROWN MW, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P51
BULLOCK TH, 1995, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V95, P161
BUZSAKI G, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P81
COFER CN, 1952, AM J PSYCHOL, V65, P75
CRAIK FIM, 1972, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V11, P671
DESMEDT JE, 1994, NEUROSCI LETT, V168, P126
DUZEL E, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V98, P8101
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
EICHENBAUM H, 2000, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V1, P41
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
ENGEL AK, 1999, CONSCIOUS COGN, V8, P128
ENGEL AK, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P16
FELL J, 2001, NAT NEUROSCI, V4, P1259
FERNANDEZ G, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P1841
FERNANDEZ G, 1999, SCIENCE, V285, P1582
FERNANDEZ G, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V14, P251
FERNANDEZ G, 2002, HIPPOCAMPUS, V12, P514
FERNANDEZ G, 2002, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V25, P281
FREEMAN WJ, 1978, ELECTROENCEPHALOGR C, V44, P586
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
FRIES P, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P12699
FRIES P, 2001, SCIENCE, V291, P1506
FRIES P, 2002, J NEUROSCI, V22, P3739
FUJITA I, 1992, NATURE, V360, P343
GABRIELI JDE, 1998, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V49, P87
GOODMAN CS, 1993, CELL, V72, P77
GORDON B, 1983, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V22, P24
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
GREGG V, 1976, RECALL RECOGNITION, P183
GRUBER T, 1999, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V110, P2074
GRUNWALD T, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P3193
GRUNWALD T, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P12085
HALGREN E, 1980, SCIENCE, V210, P803
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HERRMANN CS, 2000, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V38, P265
HERRMANN CS, 2001, VIS COGN, V8, P593
HIRAI N, 1999, NEUROSCIENCE, V90, P1149
HUANG YY, 1996, LEARN MEMORY, V3, P74
KLEE M, 1977, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V40, P647
KREIMAN G, 2000, NATURE, V408, P357
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
LABERGE D, 1997, CONSCIOUS COGN, V6, P149
LEBEDEV MA, 1995, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V2, P313
LEOPOLD DA, 1999, TRENDS COGN SCI, V3, P254
LUTZENBERGER W, 1995, NEUROSCI LETT, V183, P39
MAGEE JC, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P209
MARDIA KV, 1972, PROBABILITY MATH STA
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MCCARTHY G, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1080
MENON V, 1996, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V98, P89
MILTNER WHR, 1999, NATURE, V397, P434
MISHKIN M, 1997, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V352, P1461
MULLER MM, 1996, EXP BRAIN RES, V112, P96
MULLER MM, 2000, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V38, P283
NOBLE CE, 1963, VERBAL BEHAV LEARNIN, P76
NOBRE AC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1090
OTTEN LJ, 2001, BRAIN 2, V124, P399
PALLER KA, 1990, J EXP PSYCHOL LEARN, V16, P1021
RODRIGUEZ E, 1999, NATURE, V397, P430
RUBIN DC, 1986, MEM COGNITION, V14, P79
SANQUIST TF, 1980, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V17, P568
SCOVILLE WB, 1957, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V20, P11
SMITH ME, 1986, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V63, P145
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
STEINMETZ PN, 2000, NATURE, V404, P187
STOPFER M, 1997, NATURE, V390, P70
TALLONBAUDRY C, 1999, TRENDS COGN SCI, V3, P151
TIITINEN H, 1993, NATURE, V364, P59
VANROOST D, 1998, NEUROSURGERY, V43, P819
VARELA F, 2001, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V2, P229
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1981, 812 MPI BIOPH CHEM
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1999, NEURON, V24, P95
WAGNER AD, 1998, SCIENCE, V281, P1188
WITTER MP, 1989, PROG NEUROBIOL, V33, P161
YOUNG MP, 1992, SCIENCE, V256, P1327
N
R
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
83
2002
13
4
299
312
ISI:000180514400002
J
Fellenz, WA
Taylor, JG
The hidden-layer model of hippocampus
NEUROCOMPUTING
We analyze the problems facing the application to the hippocampus of a rec
storage by an associative memory, achieved by insertion of a hidden layer. W
biological constraints like the limited overall connectivity and the distrib
of maps. We will show that the proposed multiple layer mechanism employing
k-winner-take-all mechanism for the retrieval and completion of binary pat
can be matched to the layers of the hippocampus, allowing some of its biologi
in terms of the model. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
C AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
R AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
ANDERSON JA, 1968, KYBERNETIK, V5, P113
ANDERSON JA, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P413
ARBIB MA, 1998, NEURAL ORG STRUCTURE
BOSCH H, 1993, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P869
BROWN TH, 1979, SYNAPTIC ORG BRAIN, P346
BUSZAKI G, 1992, SCIENCE, V256, P1025
EICHENBAUM H, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P13500
FELLENZ WA, 1999, INT JOINT C NEUR NET, V2, P775
FOSTER J, 1997, COGNITIVE MODELS MEM, P275
FREUND TF, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P347
FUSTER JM, 1995, MEMORY CEREBRAL CORT
GLUCK MA, 1997, NEUROBIOLOGY LEARNIN, P417
GRAHAM B, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P337
GRANGER R, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P567
HASSELMO ME, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P3898
HASSOUN MH, 1995, ASS NEURAL MEMORIES
HEIT G, 1988, NATURE, V333, P773
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KANERVA P, 1988, SPARSE DISTRIBUTED M
KOHONEN T, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P353
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
LEVY WB, 1989, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V23, P243
LORINCZ A, 1998, BIOL CYBERN, V79, P263
MARR D, 1971, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V262, P23
MCCLELLAND JL, 1995, PSYCHOL REV, V102, P419
MCNAUGHTON BL, 1987, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V10, P408
MOLL M, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P1017
MURRE JMJ, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P675
OKADA M, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1429
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PATTON PE, 1995, HIPPOCAMPUS, V5, P245
RAWLINS JNP, 1985, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V8, P479
ROLLS ET, 1989, NEURAL MODELS PLASTI, P240
ROLLS ET, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS BRAI
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SQUIRE LR, 1988, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V11, P170
STEINBUCH K, 1961, KYBERNETIK, V1, P36
TEYLER TJ, 1986, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V100, P147
TRAUB RD, 1999, FAST OSCILLATIONS CO
VOGEL DD, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P897
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WILLSHAW DJ, 1990, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V329, P205
WU K, 1998, HIPPOCAMPUS, V8, P217
ZOLAMORGAN SM, 1990, SCIENCE, V250, P288
N
46
R
P JAN
D
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
2003
50
31
50
ISI:000180567700004
J
Lenze, B
On a perceptron-type learning rule for higher order Hopficld neural networ
translation
NEUROCOMPUTING
In the following, we will introduce a new Perceptron-like learning rule to e
of higher order Hopfield neural networks without significant increase of the
approach will lead to a generalized Perceptron learning rule which generates
networks with dilation and translation that perform perfectly on the traini
fulfills the so-called conditionally strong F-separability condition. In th
satisfies a kind of optimality criterion which means that it finds appropr
finite number of learning cycles in case that a solution exists. (C) 2002 Els
reserved.
C ANDERSON JA, 1972, MATH BIOSCI, V14, P197
R BALDI P, 1987, PHYS REV LETT, V58, P913
CHAO DY, 1993, COMPUT J, V36, P554
CHEN HH, 1986, AIP C P, P86
COHEN MA, 1983, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V13, P815
FAHNER G, 1994, NEURAL NETWORKS, V7, P279
GILES CL, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P4972
GILES CL, 1988, NEURAL INFORMATION P, P301
GROSSBERG S, 1968, P NATIONAL ACADEMY S, V59, P368
HASSOUN MH, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P275
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPFIELD JJ, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P3088
KAMP Y, 1990, RECURSIVE NEURAL NET
KOHONEN T, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P353
KOHONEN T, 1984, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
KOSKO B, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P4947
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
LENZE B, 1996, ADV TOPICS MULTIVARI, P197
LENZE B, 1998, DISCRETE APPL MATH, V89, P169
LEUNG CS, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P879
LEUNG CS, 1994, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V24, P791
PSALTIS D, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P149
ROSENBLATT F, 1958, PSYCHOL REV, V65, P386
ROSENBLATT F, 1962, PRINCIPLES NEURODYNA
SHANMUKH K, 1993, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, V3, P2670
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SRINIVASAN V, 1991, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, P2472
WANG T, 1994, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V24, P778
WANG YF, 1990, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V1, P81
WANG YF, 1991, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P559
ZHANG BL, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P864
ZHUANG X, 1992, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P1010
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
32
OCT
2002
48
391
401
ISI:000178464600025
J
Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
Scene segmentation by spike synchronization in reciprocally connected visu
cortical feedback
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
To investigate scene segmentation in the visual system we present a model
visual areas using spiking neurons. Area P corresponds to the orientation-sele
visual cortex, while the central visual area C is modeled as associative memory
according to Hebbian learning. Without feedback from area C, a single stimul
and irregular activity, synchronized only for neighboring patches (slow state
activity is faster with an enlarged synchronization range (fast state). Wh
of several stimulus objects, scene segmentation happens on a time scale of
alternating epochs of the slow and last states, where neurons representing the
in the fast state. Correlation analysis reveals synchronization on differe
experiments (designated as tower, castle, and hill peaks). On the fast tim
frequency range), recordings from two sites coding either different or the sa
that are either flat or exhibit oscillatory modulations with a central pea
experimental findings, whereas standard phase-coding models would predict
different objects.
C ABELES M, 1982, LOCAL CORTICAL CIRCU
R AERTSEN A, 1994, P S OSC EV REL BRAIN
AERTSEN A, 1994, PHYSICA D, V75, P103
ANDERSON J, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P617
ARIELI A, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1868
BARTSCH AP, 2001, BIOL CYBERN, V84, P41
BIBBIG A, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P9053
BONHOEFFER T, 1991, NATURE, V353, P429
BONHOEFFER T, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P4157
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, LECTURE NOTES BIOMAT, V21, P171
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1990, NEURAL COMPUT, V2, P293
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P9136
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FAHLE M, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V66, P1
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
GERSTNER W, 1993, BIOL CYBERN, V68, P363
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HOFFMANN K, 1996, NEUROWISSENSCHAFT, P405
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P510
KNOBLAUCH A, 1999, THESIS U ULM ULM
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, EMERGING NEURAL COMP, P407
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P168
KONIG P, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P155
KONIG P, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P469
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
MACGREGOR R, 1987, NEURAL BRAIN MODELIN
MALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
MORAN J, 1985, SCIENCE, V229, P782
NELSON JI, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P21
NOWAK LG, 2000, TIME BRAIN, P53
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1985, COGN SYST, V1, P107
PALM G, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P211
PALM G, 1987, REAL BRAINS ARTIFICI
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
PALM G, 1993, BRAIN THEORY
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, NEURON, V24, P19
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SCHILLEN TB, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P167
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
TSODYKS M, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1943
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P161
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1992, BIOL CYBERN, V67, P233
WENNEKERS T, 1995, SUPERCOMPUTING BRAIN, P301
WENNEKERS T, 1996, P INT C ART NEUR NET, P451
WENNEKERS T, 1997, THEOR BIOSCI, V116, P273
WENNEKERS T, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P579
WENNEKERS T, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA, P251
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
57
SEP
2002
87
3
151
167
ISI:000178406500001
J
Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
Scene segmentation by spike synchronization in reciprocally connected visual
and synchronization on larger space and time scales
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
A We present further simulation results of the model of two reciprocally con
B in the first paper [Knoblauch and Palm (2002) Biol Cybern 87:151-167]. One
orientation-selective subsystem of the primary visual cortex, the other is mo
representing stimulus objects according to Hebbian learning. We examine the
of our model on larger time and space scales. and relate it to experimental
is achieved by attention switching on a time-scale longer than the gamma rang
can vary depending on habituation parameters in the range of tens to hundreds
process can be related to findings concerning attention and biased competi
experimental poststimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of single neurons under
attentional conditions. In a larger variant the model exhibits traveling w
and fast time-scales, with properties similar to those found in experiments
standard model is the tendency to produce anti-phase correlations for fast
Increasing the inter-areal delays in our model produces alternations of in
oscillations. The experimentally observed in-phase correlations can most n
involvement of both fast and slow inter-areal connections; e.g., by two ax
to fast-conducting myelinated and slow-conducting unmyelinated axons.
C ANDERSON J, 2000, NAT NEUROSCI, V3, P617
R ARIELI A, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1868
BI GQ, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P10464
BIBBIG A, 2000, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
BIBBIG A, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P9053
BORISYUK G, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA, P331
BRAITENBERG V, 1978, THEORETICAL APPROACH, P171
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
CALLAWAY EM, 1998, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V21, P47
CRICK F, 1990, SEMINARS NEUROSCIENC, V2, P263
CROOK S, 1999, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V4, P161
DECO G, 2000, VISION RES, V40, P2845
DUNCAN J, 1994, NATURE, V369, P313
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P464
ECKHORN R, 2001, VIS COGN, V8, P519
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P9136
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FAHLE M, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V66, P1
FODOR JA, 1988, COGNITION, V28, P3
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
FUKUSHIMA K, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P119
GERSTNER W, 1993, BIOL CYBERN, V68, P363
HANSEL D, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P192
HARVEY AR, 1980, J PHYSL, V302, P507
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HELLWIG B, 2000, BIOL CYBERN, V82, P111
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P510
INNOCENTI GM, 1980, ARCH ITAL BIOL, V118, P124
KASTNER S, 2000, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V23, P315
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, EMERGING NEURAL COMP, P407
KNOBLAUCH A, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P763
KNOBLAUCH A, 2002, BIOL CYBERN, V87, P151
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
LUMER ED, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P207
MACGREGOR R, 1987, NEURAL BRAIN MODELIN
MALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MCCOURT ME, 1990, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V5, P83
MORAN J, 1985, SCIENCE, V229, P782
MUNK MHJ, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V74, P2401
NELSON JI, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P21
NEUMANN H, 1999, BIOL CYBERN, V81, P425
NILSSON N, 1998, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE
NOWAK LG, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V74, P2379
NOWAK LG, 2000, TIME BRAIN, P53
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
PALM G, 1993, BRAIN THEORY
PALM G, 1993, HIPPOCAMPUS, V3, P219
POPPEL E, 1994, INT REV NEUROBIOL, V37, P185
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P1736
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, NEURON, V24, P19
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SERENO MI, 1995, SCIENCE, V268, P889
SHASTRI L, 1993, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V16, P417
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMMER FT, 1998, ADV NEUR IN, V10, P675
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P7200
STERIADE M, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P392
STERIADE M, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P2533
SUN R, 1992, CONNECT SCI, V4, P93
SUN R, 1995, COMPUTATIONAL ARCHIT
SWADLOW H, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA, P131
TRAUB RD, 1996, NATURE, V383, P621
TREISMAN A, 1998, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V353, P1295
TREISMAN AM, 1980, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V12, P97
TSODYKS M, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P1943
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P161
WANG D, 1990, NEUR COMP, V2, P94
WENNEKERS T, 1997, THEOR BIOSCI, V116, P273
WENNEKERS T, 2002, ENZYKLOPADIE PSYCHOL, C
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
78
SEP
2002
87
3
168
184
ISI:000178406500002
P
J
T
A Moller, U
U Ligges, M
Georgiewa, P
Grunling, C
Kaiser, WA
Witte, H
Blanz, B
T
How to avoid spurious cluster validation? A methodological investigation o
I
S
NEUROIMAGE
O
A This paper presents an evaluation of a common approach that has been conside
B exploratory fMRI data analyses. The approach includes two stages: creating
partitions with increasing number of subsets (clustering) and selecting the
that exhibits the clearest indications of an existing structure (cluster val
that the selected partition is actually the best characterization of the dat
were directed to find the most appropriate validity function(s). In our analys
the sequence of partitions according to the given objective function. Our stu
optimization of the partition, for one or more numbers of clusters, can easil
result which, in turn, may lead the analyst to a misleading interpretation of
a sufficient optimization, for each included number of clusters, provided the
characterization of the data. Furthermore, it enabled an adequate evaluati
These findings were obtained independently for three clustering algorithms (r
clustering variant) and three up-to-date cluster validity functions. The findi
of Gaussian clusters, simulated data sets that mimic typical fMRI response
Based on our results we propose a number of options of how to configure im
2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
C *MATHW INC, 1999, MATHL MATH SOFTW PAC
R ALSULTAN KS, 1997, PATTERN RECOGN, V30, P2023
ANDERSEN AH, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P795
ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEZDEK JC, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
BEZDEK JC, 1992, FUZZY MODELS PATTERN
BEZDEK JC, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS, V8, P729
BILBRO GL, 1994, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V24, P684
BOOKHEIMER SY, 1995, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P93
BOUDRAA AO, 1999, ELECTRON LETT, V35, P1606
BRUNSWICK N, 1999, BRAIN 10, V122, P1901
CHUANG KH, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
DIEBOLD F, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11
DUDA RO, 1973, PATTERN RECOGNITION
EQUITZ WH, 1989, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, V37, P1568
FADILI MJ, 2001, MED IMAGE ANAL, V5, P55
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRANTI P, 1998, PATTERN RECOGN, V31, P1139
FUKAYAMA Y, 1989, P 5 FUZZ SYST S, P247
GERSHO A, 1997, VECTOR QUANTIZATION
GEVA AB, 2000, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V21, P511
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HAGOORT P, 1999, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V11, P383
HWANG WJ, 1998, IEICE T INF SYST ED, V81, P616
JAIN AK, 1988, ALGORITHMS CLUSTERIN
JARMASZ M, 1998, P ISMRM 6 ANN M SYDN, P2068
JARMASZ M, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP M 200
JARMASZ M, 2001, NEUROIMAGE S 2, V13, S163
JIANG T, 2000, P IEEE INT S BIOINF, P223
KIM DJ, 2001, IEICE T INF SYST ED, V84, P281
KIM SG, 1997, J NEUROSCI METH, V74, P229
KOTHARI R, 1999, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V20, P405
KWEON SH, 1999, ELECTRON LETT, V34, P2176
LAI SH, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P827
LEVIN DN, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P153
LINDE Y, 1980, IEEE T COMMUN, V28, P85
MOLLER U, 1998, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V46, P2515
MOLLER U, 2001, NEUROIMAGE 1, V14, P206
NAKAMURA E, 1998, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V19, P1265
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
ONG SH, 2000, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V21, P365
PAL NR, 1995, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V3, P370
PAULESU E, 1993, NATURE, V362, P342
PENA JM, 1999, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V20, P1027
PIZZI NJ, 2001, ARTIF INTELL MED, V21, P263
PUZICHA J, 2000, PATTERN RECOGN, V33, P617
REZAEE MR, 1998, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V19, P237
ROBERTS SJ, 2000, PATTERN RECOGN, V33, P833
SERGENT J, 1992, CEREB CORTEX, V2, P68
SOMORJAI R, 2001, ARTIFICIAL INTELL ME
SVENSEN M, 2000, P 7 INT C NEUR INF P, P88
TECCHIOLLI GP, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V65, P501
TSENG LY, 2000, PATTERN RECOGN, V33, P1251
WICHERT A, 2001, NEUROIMAGE S 2, V13, S282
WINDHAM MP, 1982, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V4, P357
WISMULLER A, 2001, INT J COMPUT VISION, V46, P103
XUANLI LX, 1991, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V13, P841
ZAHID N, 1999, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V20, P123
ZAHID N, 1999, PATTERN RECOGN, V32, P1089
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
62
SEP
2002
17
1
431
446
ISI:000178102000033
P
J
T
A Cordes, D
U Haughton, V
Carew, JD
Arfanakis, K
Maravilla, K
T
Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data
I
S MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
O
A Low frequency oscillations, which-are temporally correlated in functionall
B characterize the mammalian brain, even when no explicit cognitive-tasks ar
connectivity MR imaging is used to map regions of the resting brain showing s
fluctuations in cerebral blood flow and oxygenation. In this study, we use a h
to detect similarities of low-frequency fluctuations. We describe one measu
frequency range for classification of resting-state. fMRI data. Furthermor
contribution of motion and hardware instabilities to resting-state correla
reduce artifacts. For all cortical regions studied and clusters obtained,
contamination of functional connectivity maps by the respiratory and cardiac
patterns of functional connectivity can be obtained with hierarchical clus
neuronal connections. The corresponding voxel time series do not show sign
respiratory or cardiac frequency band. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All
C *MATHW INC, MATL STAT TOOLB
R ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BISWAL B, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P537
BRESSLER SL, 1997, 9701 ASOCS, P37
BRESSLER SL, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P26
CORDES D, 1999, P 7 ANN M ISMRM PHIL, P1706
CORDES D, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1636
CORDES D, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P1326
COX RW, 1996, COMPUT BIOMED RES, V29, P162
COX RW, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P1014
DREVETS WC, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P3628
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1995, CLIN NEUROSCI, V3, P89
GESCHWIND N, 1965, BRAIN, V88, P231
GILLER CA, 1999, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V19, P452
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
HARTIGAN JA, 1975, CLUSTERING ALGORITHM
HAUGHTON VM, 1998, OXYGEN TRANSPORT TIS, P583
HOFFMAN RE, 1993, SCHIZOPHRENIA BULL, V19, P119
HYDE JS, 1999, MED RADIOLOGY DIAGNO, P263
KIVINIEWI V, 2001, P ISMRM 9 ANN M GLAS, P1708
LOWE MJ, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V37, P723
LOWE MJ, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P119
LOWE MJ, 1999, P 7 ANN M INT SOC MA, P1711
MADSEN EL, 1991, MED PHYS, V18, P549
MALDJIAN JA, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P239
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
OBRIG H, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P623
QUIGLEY M, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P294
RANDALL PL, 1983, MED HYPOTHESES, V10, P247
SMITH AM, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P526
STEIN T, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1397
WEINBERGER DR, 1992, AM J PSYCHIAT, V149, P890
XIONG JH, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P151
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
37
MAY
2002
20
4
305
317
ISI:000177489400001
P
J
T
A Dodel, S
U Herrmann, JM
Geisel, T
T
Functional connectivity by cross-correlation clustering
I
S
NEUROCOMPUTING
O
A In addition to information on localization of brain functions, data from f
B cues about the functional connectivity among modular units, We propose a d
clustering algorithm based on temporal cross-correlations and elements of
functionally connected regions. The cluster concept can be changed in a co
functional connectivity structure in detail. The algorithm is applied to da
to successfully determine clusters related to the stimulus. Furthermore, t
include the analysis of temporal relations between different brain regions.
Science B.V.
C ARFANAKIS K, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P921
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
N
3
R
P
JUN
D
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
2002
44
1065
1070
ISI:000176839200154
J
Booth, V
Bose, A
Burst synchrony patterns in hippocampal pyramidal cell model networks
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
Types of, mechanisms for and stability of synchrony are discussed in the c
pyramidal cell and interneuron model networks. We show how the strength an
excitatory synaptic inputs work together to produce either perfectly synchr
oscillations, across different burst or spiking modes of firing. The analysi
tend to desynchronize cells, and how common, slowly decaying inhibition can
We also introduce the concept of 'equivalent networks' in which networks wit
synaptic connections display identical firing patterns.
C BARTOS M, 2001, J NEUROSCI, V21, P2687
R BOOTH V, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V85, P2432
BOOTH V, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P497
BOSE A, 2000, PHYSICA D, V140, P69
BOSE A, 2002, UNPUB ANAL EXCITATIO
BRACCI E, 2001, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V85, P2412
BUTERA RJ, 1999, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V82, P398
CHOW CC, 1998, PHYSICA D, V118, P343
ERMENTROUT GB, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P1259
GERSTNER W, 1996, NEURAL COMPUT, V8, P1653
MENSCHIK ED, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P443
MORRIS C, 1981, BIOPHYS J, V35, P193
OKEEFE J, 1971, BRAIN RES, V34, P171
PINSKY P, 1994, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V1, P39
PINSKY PF, 1995, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V2, P275
RUBIN J, 2000, NEURAL COMPUT, V12, P597
SOMERS D, 1993, BIOL CYBERN, V68, P393
THOMSON AM, 1994, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V17, P119
THOMSON AM, 1997, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V502, P131
TIESINGA PHE, 2001, HIPPOCAMPUS, V11, P251
TRAUB RD, 1991, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V66, P635
TRAUB RD, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P2086
VANVREESWIJK C, 1994, J COMPUTATIONAL NEUR, V1, P313
WENNEKERS T, 1999, NEUROCOMPUTING, V26, P573
YLINEN A, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P30
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
25
MAY
2002
13
2
157
177
ISI:000175773700001
P
J
T
A Sandberg, A
U Lansner, A
Petersson, KM
Ekeberg, O
T
A Bayesian attractor network with incremental learning
I
S
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
O
A A realtime online learning system with capacity limits needs to gradually fo
B to avoid catastrophic forgetting. This can be achieved by allowing new inf
in a so-called palimpsest memory. This paper describes an incremental learni
confidence propagation neural network that has palimpsest properties when em
network. The network does not suffer from catastrophic forgetting, has a capa
time constant and exhibits faster convergence for newer patterns.
C AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
R AMIT DJ, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P359
ANDERSEN P, 1980, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V302, P463
BAYES T, 1958, BIOMETRIKA, V45, P296
BHALLA US, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P381
BIENENSTOCK EL, 1982, J NEUROSCI, V2, P32
BONNAZ D, 1997, J PHYS I, V7, P1709
BRUNEL N, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P123
CHARNIAK E, 1985, INTRO ARTIFICIAL INT, CH8
FRANSEN E, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P271
FRANSEN E, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P235
FREEMAN WJ, 1991, SCI AM, V264, P78
FREY U, 1997, NATURE, V385, P533
GESZTI T, 1987, J PHYS A, V20, L1299
GILBERT CD, 1989, J NEUROSCI, V9, P2432
GOOD IJ, 1950, PROBABILITY WEIGHING
HABERLY LB, 1989, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V12, P258
HASSELMO ME, 1992, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V67, P1230
HASSELMO ME, 1996, HIPPOCAMPUS, V6, P693
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HERTZ J, 1991, LECT NOTES SANTA FE, V1
HOLST A, 1997, THESIS ROYAL I TECHN
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HUBEL DH, 1977, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V198, P1
JESTER JM, 1995, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V484, P689
KONONENKO I, 1989, BIOL CYBERN, V61, P361
LANSER A, 1987, IEEE 1 INT C NEUR NE, P549
LANSER A, 1991, P ICANN 91 ART NEUR, P247
LANSNER A, 1989, INT J NEURAL SYSTEMS, V1, P77
LANSNER A, 1996, INT J NEURAL SYST, V7, P115
LEVY WB, 1985, SYNAPTIC MODIFICATIO
LISMAN JE, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1512
LITTLE WA, 1975, BEHAVIORAL BIOL, V14, P115
MACKAY DJC, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P469
NADAL JP, 1986, EUROPHYS LETT, V1, P535
PARISI G, 1986, J PHYS A, V19, L617
PETERSEN CCH, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P4732
PURVES D, 1992, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V15, P362
QUINLAN P, 1991, CONNECTIONISM PSYCHO
SANDBERG A, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P867
SEJNOWSKI TJ, 1989, COMPUTING NEURON
SHEPHERD GM, 1998, SYNAPTIC OPTIMIZATIO
SOMMER FT, 1998, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V9, P705
SQUIRE LR, 1992, PSYCHOL REV, V99, P195
STERNBERG S, 1966, SCIENCE, V153, P652
WAHLGREN N, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P433
WICKENS J, 1995, MODELS INFORMATION P, P187
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WOOLF NJ, 1996, NEUROBIOL LEARN MEM, V66, P258
N
49
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
MAY
2002
13
2
179
194
ISI:000175773700002
S
Erdi, P
Kiss, T
The complexity of the brain: Structural, functional, and dynamic modules
EMERGENT NEURAL COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURES BASED ON NEUROSCIENCE: TOWARDS NE
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
The 'complexity of the' brain is reviewed in terms of structural, function
Specifically, the modular concept is supplemented by using statistical appr
of large population of neurons. The relationship between anatomical cortic
synchronized spatiotemporal activity propagation was studied by using larg
technique.
C ARADI I, 1995, INT J INTELL SYST, V10, P89
R ARBIB M, IN PRESS BEHAV BRAIN
ARBIB M, 1997, NEURAL ORG STRUCTURE
ARBIB MA, 1989, METAPHORICAL BRAIN, V2
ERDI P, 1992, INT S INF PHYS KYUSH, P110
ERDI P, 1993, THEOR MED, V14, P137
ERDI P, 1997, BIOSYSTEMS, V40, P45
ERDI P, 1998, ARTIF INTELL, V101, P341
GROBLER T, 1998, BIOL CYBERN, V79, P301
KISS T, 2000, CYBERNETICS SYSTEM R, P330
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1997, BRAIN 4, V120, P701
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SZENTAGOTHAI J, 1978, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V201, P219
VENTRIGLIA F, 1974, B MATH BIOL, V36, P534
VENTRIGLIA F, 1994, NEURAL MODELING NEUR, P217
WANG XJ, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P6402
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
A
B
17
2001
2036
203
211
ISI:000174764100015
S
Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
Spiking associative memory and scene segmentation by synchronization of co
EMERGENT NEURAL COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURES BASED ON NEUROSCIENCE: TOWARDS NE
LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
For the recognition of objects there are a number of computational requirement
of simple geometric features like oriented lines. When there are several parti
in a visual scene one has to have an internal knowledge about the object t
associative memories.
We have studied the bidirectional dynamical interaction of two areas, wher
to match area V1 in greater detail and the higher area uses Hebbian learning
for a number of geometric shapes. Both areas are modelled with simple spiking
of "binding" by spike-synchronisation and of the effects of Hebbian learning i
(including the long-range cortico-cortical projections) are studied.
Presenting a superposition of three stimulus objects corresponding to learned
two states of activity: (i) relatively slow and unordered activity, synchroni
and (ii) faster oscillations, synchronized over larger regions. The neuron gr
tended to be simultaneously in either the slow or the fast state. At each part
was found to be in the fast state. Activation of the three assemblies swit
milliseconds.
C AERTSEN A, 1994, PHYSICA D, V75, P103
R AERTSEN AMHJ, 1989, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V61, P900
ARIELI A, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1868
BIBBIG A, 2000, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P9136
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HOFFMANN K, 1996, NEUROWISSENSCHAFT, P405
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPFIELD JJ, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P3088
KNOBLAUCH A, 1999, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
KNOBLAUCH A, 2000, UNPUB BIOL CYBERNETI
KNOBLAUCH A, 2000, UNPUB NEURAL NETWORK
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
MACGREGOR RJ, 1987, NEURAL BRAIN MODELIN
MILLER R, 2000, TIME BRAIN
NOWAK LG, 2000, TIME BRAIN, P53
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1987, SCIENCE, V235, P1227
POPPEL E, 1994, INT REV NEUROBIOL, V37, P185
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, NEURON, V24, P19
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SWADLOW H, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA, P131
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P161
WENNECKERS T, 1999, SYNCHRONISATION ASS
WENNEKERS T, 1995, SUPERCOMPUTING BRAIN, P301
WENNEKERS T, 1997, THEOR BIOSCI, V116, P273
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WORGOTTER F, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1959
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
38
2001
2036
407
427
ISI:000174764100030
E
R
P
J
T
A Balslev, D
U Nielsen, FA
Frutiger, SA
Sidtis, JJ
Christiansen, TB
Svarer, C
Strother, SC
Rottenberg, DA
Hansen, LK
Paulson, OB
Law, I
T
Cluster analysis of activity-time series in motor learning
I
S
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
O
A Neuroimaging studies of learning focus on brain areas where the activity c
B To circumvent the difficult problem of model selection, we used a data-dri
analysis, which extracts representative temporal and spatial patterns from
optimal number of clusters was chosen using a cross-validated likelihood m
clustering pattern that generalizes best over the subjects. Data were acquir
points during practice of a visuomotor task. The results from cluster anal
activity in a fronto-parieto-cerebellar network, in agreement with previou
These voxels were separated from a group of voxels showing an unspecific t
of voxels, whose activation was an artifact from smoothing. Hum. Brain Mappi
Wiley-Liss, Inc.
C ALDAOUD MB, 1996, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V17, P451
R ANDERSSON JLR, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P237
ASHBURNER J, 1996, QUANTIFICATION BRAIN, P301
BAUMGARTNER R, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1094
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEZDEK JC, 1974, J CYBERNETICS, V3, P58
BIERNACKI C, 2000, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V22, P719
BISHOP CM, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
BLINKENBERG M, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P794
BOTTOU L, 1995, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V7, P585
BUCHEL C, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V4, P60
CELEUX G, 1992, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V14, P315
CELEUX G, 2001, P ASMDA COMP, P21
DEGRADO TR, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P1398
DEIBER MP, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V78, P977
DING X, 1994, P SMR 2 ANN M SAN FR, P630
DING X, 1996, P SMR 4 ANN M NEW YO, P1798
DUNN JC, 1974, J CYBERNETICS, V3, P32
EVANS AC, 1994, NATO ADV SCI INST A, V264, P263
FRALEY C, 1998, COMPUT J, V41, P578
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P165
FRISTON KJ, 1997, HUMAN BRAIN FUNCTION, P25
FRUTIGER SA, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P515
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GOUTTE C, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V13, P165
GRAFTON ST, 1992, J NEUROSCI, V12, P2542
GRAFTON ST, 1994, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V1, P221
GRAFTON ST, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P9420
HANSEN LK, 1996, P IEEE INT C NEUR NE, V1, P25
HANSEN LK, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, S917
HAZELTINE E, 1997, BRAIN 1, V120, P123
HONDA M, 1998, BRAIN 11, V121, P2159
INOUE K, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P505
JENKINS IH, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P3775
JUEPTNER M, 1997, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V77, P1313
JUEPTNER M, 1998, BRAIN 8, V121, P1437
KREBS HI, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P59
LEWELLEN TK, 1999, NUCL MED COMMUN, V20, P5
LLOYD SP, 1982, IEEE INFO T, V28, P129
MACQUEEN J, 1967, 5TH P BERK S MATH ST, V1, P281
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MORCH N, 1997, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1230, P259
OLDFIELD RC, 1971, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V9, P97
PAUS T, 1995, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V74, P2179
PETERSSON KM, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P234
RAJAH MN, 1998, NEUROIMAGE 1, V7, P314
SCARTH G, 1995, DETECTION NOVELTY FU, P238
SMYTH P, 1996, P 2 INT C KNOWL DISC, P126
SMYTH P, 2000, STAT COMPUT, V10, P63
TALAIRACH J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC
TONI I, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P50
TONI I, 1999, EXP BRAIN RES, V127, P19
VANHORN JD, 1998, BRAIN RES, V793, P29
VANMIER H, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V80, P2177
WOODS RP, 1992, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V16, P620
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
56
MAR
2002
15
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
3
135
145
ISI:000174117900001
J
Pulvermuller, F
Brain reflections of words and their meaning
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES
The neurobiological organization of meaningful language units, morphemes an
by recent metabolic and neurophysiological imaging studies. When humans pr
categories, sets of cortical areas become active differentially. The meani
aspects of its reference, may be crucial for determining which set of cort
process! ng. Word-related neuron webs with specific cortical distributions
category-specific differences in brain activity. Neuroscientific principles
topographies.
C ABELES M, 1993, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V70, P1629
R ANGRILLI A, 2000, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V111, P706
BARLOW HB, 1972, PERCEPTION, V1, P371
BENTIN S, 1985, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V60, P343
BRAITENBERG V, 1992, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, V79, P103
BRAITENBERG V, 1998, CORTEX STAT GEOMETRY
BROCA P, 1861, B SOC ANAT PARIS, V36, P330
BROWN WS, 1979, EXP BRAIN RES, V2, S159
CARAMAZZA A, 1998, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V10, P1
CHEOUR M, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P351
DEHAENE S, 1995, NEUROREPORT, V6, P2153
DEHAENELAMBERTZ G, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, P1885
DEVLIN JT, 1998, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V10, P77
DIESCH E, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, P455
EULITZ C, 2000, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V37, P447
FARAH MJ, 1991, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V120, P339
FUSTER JM, 1995, MEMORY CEREBRAL CORT
FUSTER JM, 1997, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V20, P451
FUSTER JM, 2000, NATURE, V405, P347
HAGOORT P, 1999, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V11, P383
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPSYCH
HUMPHREYS GW, 1987, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V10, P145
HUMPHREYS GW, 2001, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V24, P453
KIEFER M, 2001, MEM COGNITION, V29, P100
KOENIG T, 1996, BRAIN LANG, V53, P169
KORPILAHTI P, 2001, BRAIN LANG, V76, P332
KRAUSE CM, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V107, P84
LASHLEY KS, 1950, S SOC EXPT BIOL, V4, P454
LECLECH G, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P381
LOCKE JL, 1993, CHILDS PATH SPOKEN L
LUTZENBERGER W, 1994, NEUROSCI LETT, V176, P115
MARSLENWILSON W, 1980, COGNITION, V8, P1
MARTIN A, 1996, NATURE, V379, P649
MILLER R, 1996, AXONAL CONDUCTION TI
MILNER PM, 1996, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V8, P69
MOLFESE DL, 1996, BRAIN LANG, V54, P388
MOORE CJ, 1999, BRAIN 5, V122, P943
MUMMERY CJ, 1998, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V10, P766
NAATANEN R, 1999, PSYCHOL BULL, V125, P826
NAATANEN R, 2001, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V38, P1
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES
PANDYA DN, 1985, CEREB CORTEX, V4, P3
PENFIELD W, 1950, CEREBRAL CORTEX MAN
PERANI D, 1999, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V37, P293
PERRY C, 1999, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V11, P312
PETERSEN SE, 1993, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V16, P509
PREISSL H, 1995, NEUROSCI LETT, V197, P81
PRICE CJ, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P62
PULVERMULLER F, 1995, NEUROREPORT, V6, P2057
PULVERMULLER F, 1996, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V98, P76
PULVERMULLER F, 1996, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V20, P557
PULVERMULLER F, 1997, PROG NEUROBIOL, V52, P427
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P253
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P498
PULVERMULLER F, 1999, NEUROSCI LETT, V275, P81
PULVERMULLER F, 2000, NEUROREPORT, V11, P2789
PULVERMULLER F, 2001, BRAIN LANG, V78, P143
PULVERMULLER F, 2001, EUR J NEUROSCI, V13, P201
PULVERMULLER F, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V14, P607
RIZZOLATTI G, 1998, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V106, P283
RUGG MD, 1983, BRAIN LANG, V19, P142
SHTYROV Y, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P657
SKRANDIES W, 1998, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V6, P173
SOMMER FT, 2000, J PHYSIOLOGY-PARIS, V94, P473
SPITZER M, 1998, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V6, P309
TALLONBAUDRY C, 1999, TRENDS COGN SCI, V3, P151
TYLER LK, 2001, TRENDS COGN SCI, V5, P244
VANDENBERGHE R, 1996, NATURE, V383, P254
WARRINGTON EK, 1983, BRAIN, V106, P859
WARRINGTON EK, 1984, BRAIN, V107, P829
YOUNG MP, 1995, ANAL CORTICAL CONNEC
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
71
DEC
2001
5
12
517
524
ISI:000172508800016
P
J
T
A Gu, H
U Engelien, W
Feng, HH
Silbersweig, DA
Stern, E
Yang, YH
T
Mapping transient, randomly occurring neuropsychological events using inde
I
S
NEUROIMAGE
O
A The feasibility of mapping transient, randomly occurring neuropsychologica
B component analysis (ICA) was evaluated in an auditory sentence-monitoring
prerecorded short sentences of random content were presented in varying te
of ICA on fMRI data with such temporal characteristics was assessed by a s
as well as by human activation studies. The effects of contrast-to-noise r
hemodynamic response within a brain region, time lags of the responses among
simulated. activation locations on the ICA were investigated in the simulat
from the auditory sentence-monitoring experiments in each subject using IC
in bilateral auditory and language cortices, as well as in superior sensorimo
previous PET studies. The associated time courses in the activated brain regi
of the sentence presentation, as evidenced by the recorded button-press resp
component ordering that may rank highly the components of primary interest
developed. The simulation results characterized the performance of ICA und
provide useful information for experimental design and data interpretation
C AGUIRRE GK, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P360
R AMARI S, 1996, ADV NEUR IN, V8, P757
BANDETTINI PA, 1992, MAGNET RESON MED, V25, P390
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BANDETTINI PA, 2000, FUNCTIONAL MRI, P205
BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BELL AJ, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P1129
BISWAL BB, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P265
BUCKNER RL, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P373
COHEN J, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
COHEN MS, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P93
COMON P, 1994, SIGNAL PROCESS, V36, P11
CORDES D, 1999, P 7 ANN M ISMRM PHIL, P1706
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRISTON K, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P92
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P153
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HU XP, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P201
HYVARINEN A, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P411
KWONG KK, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P5675
LABAR KS, 1998, NEURON, V20, P937
LAI SH, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P827
LE TH, 1995, P SMR, P820
LEE TW, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P409
LIU TT, 2000, P 8 ANN M ISMRM DENV, P847
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P368
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P803
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
OGAWA S, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P9868
OGAWA S, 1992, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V89, P5951
OJEMANN JG, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P156
SILBERSWEIG DA, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P617
SILBERSWEIG DA, 1994, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V14, P771
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P173
XIONG JH, 1995, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P287
YANG YH, 2000, MAGNET RESON MED, V43, P185
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
44
DEC
2001
14
6
1432
1443
ISI:000172524500020
P
S
T
A Payrits, S
U Szatmary, Z
Zalanyi, L
Erdi, P
T
Use of parallel computers in neurocomputing
I
S
RECENT ADVANCES IN PARALLEL VIRTUAL MACHINE AND MESSAGE PASSING INTERFACE,
O
S
LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
E
A Large-scale simulation of brain activity is based on a general theory withi
B field theory. The theory and algorithm developed is now implemented to a c
computational capacity the simulation of normal and pathological cortical
possible.
C ARBIB M, 1997, NEURAL ORG STRUCTURE
R BARNA G, 1998, BIOL CYBERN, V79, P308
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
SZATMARY Z, 2000, THESIS TU BUDAPEST
VENTRIGLIA F, 1974, B MATH BIOL, V36, P534
N
5
R
P
2000
Y
V 1908
L
B
313
P
E
321
P
U
ISI:000171904500043
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Kotter, R
U Stephan, KE
Palomero-Gallagher, N
Geyer, S
Schleicher, A
Zilles, K
T Multimodal characterisation of cortical areas by multivariate analyses of rec
I data
S
ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY
O
A Cortical areas are regarded as fundamental structural and functional units wit
B networks of the brain. Their properties have been described extensively by
chemoarchitectonics, cortical and extracortical connectivity patterns, recep
properties, lesion effects, and other structural and functional characteri
approaches aiming at multimodal characterisations of cortical areas or at the
of the cortical network, however, are still scarce and usually limited to
as cytoarchitectonical or tract tracing data. Here we describe a methodologica
evaluation, comparison and integration of different data modalities from t
practical application and significance in the analysis of receptor binding
the motor and visual cortices of macaque monkeys. The framework builds on a
data between different cortical parcellation schemes, as well as on statis
exploration of multivariate data sets comprising data of different types and
a relationship between intrinsic area properties as expressed by quantitat
extrinsic inter-area communication, which relies on anatomical connectivit
preliminary evidence for a good correspondence of these two data types in the m
discrepancy in the visual cortex, raising hypotheses about the different organ
by receptors and connectivity. The methodological framework presented here is
a wide range of further data modalities, and is specific enough to permit n
concerning brain organisation. Thus, this approach promises to be very use
characterise multimodal structure - function relationships in the brain.
C AMUNTS K, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P66
R ANDERSEN RA, 1985, J COMP NEUROL, V232, P443
BACKHAUS K, 1996, MULTIVARIATE ANALYSE
BORG I, 1997, MODERN MULTIDIMENSIO
BOZKURT A, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P1135
BRODMANN K, 1909, VERGLEICHENDE LOKALI
BURKE DS, 1986, ARBOVIRUSES EPIDEMIO, V3, P63
BURNS GAPC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P55
CRESPO C, 2000, EUR J NEUROSCI, V12, P3963
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
GALLETTI C, 1996, EUR J NEUROSCI, V8, P30
GASER C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P107
GATTASS R, 1988, J NEUROSCI, V8, P1831
GEYER S, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V397, P231
GEYER S, 2000, ANAT EMBRYOL, V202, P443
GEYER S, 2000, EUR J NEUROSCI, V12, P1554
GREENACRE MJ, 1984, THEORY APPL CORRESPO
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P71
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P91
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KOTTER R, 2001, NEUROCOMPUTING, V38, P741
LUPPINO G, 1993, J COMP NEUROL, V338, P114
MATELLI M, 1985, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V18, P125
MERKER B, 1983, J NEUROSCI METH, V9, P235
NORTHOFF G, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P93
PANDYA DN, 1982, J COMP NEUROL, V204, P196
RIZZOLATTI G, 1996, SUPPLEMENTARY SENSOR, P45
ROUSE ST, 1997, LIFE SCI, V60, P1031
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P277
SCHLEICHER A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P165
SCHLEICHER A, 2000, J CHEM NEUROANAT, V20, P31
SHANKLE WR, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P4023
SHIPP S, 1998, EUR J NEUROSCI, V10, P3171
STEPHAN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P111
STEPHAN KE, 2001, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V356, P1159
STEPHEN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P37
UNGERLEIDER LG, 1982, ANAL VISUAL BEHAV, P549
UNGERLEIDER LG, 1986, J COMP NEUROL, V248, P190
UNNERSTALL JR, 1987, NEUROBIOL AGING, V8, P567
VONBONIN G, 1947, ISOCORTEX MACACA MUL
YOUNG MP, 1992, NATURE, V358, P152
YOUNG MP, 1993, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V252, P13
YOUNG MP, 1995, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V348, P281
ZILLES K, 1988, HISTOCHEMISTRY, V90, P129
ZILLES K, 1995, AUTORADIOGRAPHY CORR, P277
ZILLES K, 1995, J ANAT 3, V187, P515
ZILLES K, 1997, CEREBR CORT, V12, P673
N
48
R
P OCT
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
2001
204
4
333
350
ISI:000171819400007
J
Amunts, K
Zilles, K
Advances in cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human cerebral cortex
NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
Figure1. Location of areas 44 (in rod) and 45 (in yellow) in two exemplary cor
brain and details of the lateral views of the hemispheres after three-dimensio
rendering. Left in the brain is left in the image. artf = ascending branch
= horizontal branch of the lateral fissure; ifs = inferior frontal sulcus; p
also Fig. 6 in article by Amunts and Zilles.)
Figure 2. Population maps of two different cortical areas superimposed on
Brodmann's area 17 (visual cortex) and 45 (part of Broca's region). The ov
voxel of the standard brain. (e.g., yellow = overlap of seven (out of 10)
10 brains. Orientation of the brain according to the AC-PC line.(126) Nonl
the overlap of the individual cortical areas in the reference space when c
of only linear tools (compare left with middle section at z = -5). Both reg
set of brains, however, intersubject variability is larger in area 45 than
in article by Amunts and Zilles.)
C ABOITIZ F, 1997, BRAIN RES REV, V25, P381
R AMUNTS K, 1995, ANAT EMBRYOL, V192, P557
AMUNTS K, 1996, NEUROIMAGE 1, V4, P216
AMUNTS K, 1997, ANAT EMBRYOL, V196, P393
AMUNTS K, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P8
AMUNTS K, 1999, J COMP NEUROL, V412, P319
AMUNTS K, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P66
AMUNTS K, 2001, CORTICAL AREAS UNITY
ANDREWS TJ, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P1859
BAILEY P, 1951, ISOCORTEX MAN
BETZ W, 1874, CENTRALBLATT MEDIZIN, P37
BIDMON HJ, 1997, NEUROSCIENCE, V81, P321
BINKOFSKI F, 1999, EUR J NEUROSCI, V11, P3276
BINKOFSKI F, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V11, P273
BLINKOV SM, 1968, ZENTRALNERVENSYSTEM
BODEGARD A, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V51, P1
BODEGARD A, 2000, NEUROREPORT, V11, P187
BRAAK H, 1977, ANAT EMBRYOL, V150, P229
BRAAK H, 1979, ANAT EMBRYOL, V157, P35
BROCA P, 1861, B SOC ANAT PARIS, V6, P330
BRODMANN K, 1903, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V2, P133
BRODMANN K, 1905, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V6, P275
BRODMANN K, 1908, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V10, P231
BRODMANN K, 1908, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V10, P287
BRODMANN K, 1909, VERGLEICHENDE LOKALI
BRODMANN K, 1919, BEITRAGE LOKALISATIO, V2, P79
BRODY H, 1955, J COMP NEUROL, V102, P551
BURKHALTER A, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V13, P1916
CAMPBELL AW, 1905, HISTOLOGICAL STUDIES
CAMPBELL MJ, 1989, J COMP NEUROL, V282, P191
CLARKE S, 1990, J COMP NEUROL, V298, P188
CLARKE S, 1993, FUNCTIONAL ORG HUMAN, P137
CLARKE S, 1994, EUR J NEUROSCI, V6, P725
DIETL MM, 1987, SYNAPSE, V1, P169
DIXON WJ, 1988, BMDP STAT SOFTWARE M
DUMOULIN SO, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, S319
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FELLEMAN DJ, 1997, J COMP NEUROL, V379, P21
FILIMONOFF IN, 1932, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V44, P2
FLECHSIG P, 1998, NEUROL CENTRALBL, V21, P977
FRITSCH G, 1870, ARCH ANAT PHYSL WISS, V37, P300
GALABURDA AM, 1980, REV NEUROL, V136, P609
GATTASS R, 1981, J COMP NEUROL, V201, P519
GATTASS R, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P110
GEYER S, 1996, NATURE, V382, P805
GEYER S, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P27
GEYER S, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V397, P231
GEYER S, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P63
GEYER S, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P684
GREFKES C, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, S824
GUNDERSEN HJG, 1988, ACTA PATHOL MIC SC, V96, P379
HARASTY J, 1996, J NEUROSCI METH, V67, P43
HAUG H, 1956, J COMP NEUROL, V104, P473
HAUG H, 1980, VERH ANAT GES, V74, P699
HAUG H, 1984, BRAIN PATHOL, V1, P123
HAUG H, 1987, AM J ANAT, V180, P126
HAUG H, 1987, GEHIM SEINE ERKRANKU, P137
HAYES TL, 1996, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V53, P1277
HENDERSON G, 1980, J NEUROL SCI, V46, P113
HENDRY SHC, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P2438
HERVE G, 1888, CIRCONVOLUTION BROCA
HUBEL DH, 1972, J COMP NEUROL, V146, P421
HUDSPETH AJ, 1976, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V73, P2928
HUTTENLOCHER PR, 1979, BRAIN RES, V163, P195
JANSEN KLR, 1989, NEUROSCIENCE, V32, P587
KAAS JH, 1989, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V1, P121
KAAS JH, 1993, FUNCTIONAL ORG HUMAN, P1
KENNEDY DN, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P372
KINDLER M, 2000, NEURIMAGE, V11, S251
KLEIST K, 1934, GEHIMPATHOLOGIE
KONONOVA EP, 1935, ANN BRAIN RES I, V1, P49
KONONOVA EP, 1938, ANN BRAIN RES I, V3, P213
KONONOVA EP, 1949, CYTOARCHITECTURE HUM, P309
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
LARSSON J, 1999, EUR J NEUROSCI, V11, P4024
LEWIS JW, 1995, J COMP NEUROL, V361, P119
LUNGWITZ W, 1937, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V47, P607
LUPPINO G, 1991, J COMP NEUROL, V311, P463
MATELLI M, 1991, J COMP NEUROL, V311, P445
MERIGAN WH, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P3180
MERKER B, 1983, J NEUROSCI METH, V9, P235
MOROSAN P, 2001, NEUROIMAGE, V13, P684
NAITO E, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P6134
NAITO E, 2000, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V83, P1701
NAKAMURA H, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P3681
NEWSOME WT, 1980, J COMP NEUROL, V194, P209
NEWSOME WT, 1986, J COMP NEUROL, V252, P139
PAKKENBERG B, 1997, J COMP NEUROL, V384, P312
PAULESU E, 1993, NATURE, V362, P342
PETERHANS E, 1993, EUR J NEUROSCI, V5, P509
PETRIDES M, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P878
PETRIDES M, 1994, HDB NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, V9, P17
RADEMACHER J, 1993, CEREB CORTEX, V3, P313
RAJKOWSKA G, 1995, CEREB CORTEX, V5, P307
RAJKOWSKA G, 1995, CEREB CORTEX, V5, P323
RIEGELE L, 1931, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V42, P496
ROLAND PE, 1993, BRAIN ACTIVATION
ROLAND PE, 1994, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V17, P458
ROLAND PE, 1996, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V6, P773
ROLAND PE, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V4, P39
ROLAND PE, 1998, BRAIN RES REV, V26, P87
ROLAND PE, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P128
SANIDES F, 1965, DT ZTSCH NERVENHEILK, V187, P680
SANIDES F, 1965, DTSCH Z NERVENHEILK, V187, P708
SARKISOV SA, 1949, CYTOARCHITECTURE HUM
SCHLEICHER A, 1990, J MICROSC-OXFORD, V157, P367
SCHLEICHER A, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPIN S, V1, P77
SCHLEICHER A, 1998, ACTA STEREOL, V17, P75
SCHLEICHER A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P165
SCHLEICHER A, 2000, J CHEM NEUROANAT
SCHMITZ C, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V88, P71
SCHORMANN T, 1993, BIOIMAGING, V1, P119
SCHORMANN T, 1995, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V14, P25
SCHORMANN T, 1997, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V16, P942
SCHORMANN T, 1997, INFORMATIK AKTUELL, P384
SCHORMANN T, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P339
SCHORMANN T, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P40
SCHORMANN T, 1999, P DAGM
SKULLERUD K, 1985, ACTA NEUROL SCA S102, V71, P1
SMITH GE, 1907, J ANAT, V41, P237
STEINMETZ H, 1990, BRAIN LANG, V39, P357
STENSAAS SS, 1974, J NEUROSURG, V40, P755
STEPHAN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P111
STRASBURGER EH, 1938, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V48, P477
TALAIRACH J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC
TANJI J, 1989, BRAIN DEV-JPN, V11, P374
TERRY RD, 1987, ANN NEUROL, V21, P530
THOMPSON PM, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V3, P19
THOMPSON PM, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P492
TOOTELL RBH, 1995, CEREB CORTEX, V5, P39
UYLINGS HBM, 1999, NEUROCOGNITION LANGU
VIERORDT H, 1993, ANATOMISCHE PHYSL PH
VOGT C, 1919, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V25, P292
VOGT O, 1910, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V15, P221
VOGT O, 1910, J PSYCHOL NEUROL, V15, P221
VONECONOMO C, 1925, CYTOARCHITEKTONIK HI
WEIBEL E, 1979, STEREOLOGICAL METHOD, V1
WEST MJ, 1993, NEUROBIOL AGING, V14, P275
WESTBURY CF, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P392
WILLIAMS RW, 1988, J COMP NEUROL, V278, P344
WONGRILEY MTT, 1993, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V10, P41
WREE A, 1982, J NEUROSCI METH, V6, P29
XIAO YP, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P792
ZEKI SM, 1978, NATURE, V274, P423
ZILLES K, FUNCTIONAL ORG HUMAN
ZILLES K, 1980, VERH ANAT GES, V74, P725
ZILLES K, 1986, ANAT EMBRYOL, V174, P129
ZILLES K, 1988, HISTOCHEMISTRY, V90, P129
ZILLES K, 1991, J COMP NEUROL, V308, P340
ZILLES K, 1991, J HIRNFORSCH, V32, P343
ZILLES
ZILLES
ZILLES
ZILLES
ZILLES
ZILLES
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
K,
K,
K,
K,
K,
K,
1991,
1991,
1995,
1995,
1997,
1997,
NEUROSCIENCE, V40, P307
RECEPTORS HUMAN NERV, P165
AUTORADIOGRAPHY CORR, P277
J ANAT 3, V187, P515
CEREBR CORT, V12, P673
HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P218
156
MAY
2001
11
2
151
+
ISI:000171325200002
J
Knoblauch, A
Palm, G
Pattern separation and synchronization in spiking associative memories and
NEURAL NETWORKS
Scene analysis in the mammalian visual system, conceived as a distributed an
so-called binding problem. As a possible solution, the temporal correlation
and implemented in phase-coding models. We propose an alternative model th
findings of synchronized and desynchronized fast oscillations more closely. T
considerations concerning improved pattern separation in associative memorie
properties of the visual cortex on the other. It consists of two reciproca
corresponding to a peripheral visual area (P), the other a central associati
orientation-selective subsystem of the primary visual cortex, while C was mo
with connections formed by Hebbian learning of all assemblies corresponding
neurons including habituation and correlated noise were incorporated as well
Three learned stimuli were presented simultaneously and correlation analys
recordings. Generally, we found two states of activity: (i) relatively slo
at about 20-25 Hz, synchronized only within small regions; and (ii) faster
around 50-60 Hz, synchronized over the whole simulated area. The neuron gro
tended to be simultaneously in either the slow or the fast state. At each part
was found to be in the fast state. Activation of the three assemblies switc
This can be interpreted as self-generated attention switching. On the time
oscillations, cross correlations between local neuron groups were either m
correlograms resulted if the groups coded features corresponding to a comm
correlograms remained flat. This behavior is in agreement with experimental re
would generally predict modulated correlations also in the case of different o
a technical version from our biological associative memory model that accompl
parallel in O(log(2) n) steps for n neurons and sparse coding. (C) 2001 Els
reserved.
C ARIELI A, 1996, SCIENCE, V273, P1868
R BIBBIG A, 2000, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX STAT
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1990, NEURAL COMPUT, V2, P293
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P6048
ENGEL AK, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P9136
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FAHLE M, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V66, P1
FRIEN A, 1994, NEUROREPORT, V5, P2273
HEBB D, 1949, ORG BEHAV NEUROPHYSI
HOFFMANN K, 1996, NEUROWISSENSCHAFT, P405
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOPFIELD JJ, 1984, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P3088
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P510
KNOBLAUCH A, 1999, THESIS U ULM GERMANY
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
MACGREGORY R, 1987, NEURAL BRAIN MODELIN
MALSBURG C, 1986, BRAIN THEORY, P161
MCCORMICK DA, 1985, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V54, P782
NELSON JI, 1992, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V9, P21
NOWAK LG, 2000, TIME BRAIN, P53
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1982, NEURAL ASSEMBLIES AL
PALM G, 1987, SCIENCE, V235, P1227
REYNOLDS JH, 1999, NEURON, V24, P19
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SCHILLEN TB, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P167
SCHILLINGER U, 1991, FLEISCHWIRTSCH INT, V1, P3
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMERS DC, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P5448
SOMMER F, 2001, J PHYSIOL-PARIS, V94, P473
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SOMMER FT, 2001, NEURAL NETWORKS, V14, P825
SWADLOW H, 2000, TIME BRAIN CONCEPTUA, P131
WENNEKERS T,
WENNEKERS T,
WENNEKERS T,
WILLSHAW DJ,
WORGOTTER F,
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
S
I
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
1995,
1997,
1999,
1969,
1991,
SUPERCOMPUTING BRAIN, P301
THEOR BIOSCI, V116, P273
SYNCHRONISATION ASS
NATURE, V222, P960
J NEUROSCI, V11, P1959
41
JUL-SEP
2001
14
6-7
Sp. Iss. SI
763
780
ISI:000171417300016
J
Lenze, B
Improving Leung's bidirectional learning rule for associative memories
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS
In 1994, Leung introduced a Perceptron-like learning rule to enhance the recal
associative memories (BAMs). He proved that his so-called bidirectional le
solution within a finite number of learning iterations in case that a solut
the setting of Leung a solution only exists in case that the training set
by hyperplanes through the origin (both with respect to input and output pat
the field. We will extend Leung's approach by considering conditionally st
allowing separating hyperplanes not containing the origin. Moreover, we wi
generalized by defining so-called dilation and translation parameters enla
leaving their complexity almost unaffected. The whole approach will lead t
learning rule which generates BAMs with dilation and translation that perf
set in case that the latter satisfies the conditionally strong linear separa
in the sense of Leung, we will end up with an optimal learning strategy wh
idea as a special case.
C ANDERSON JA, 1972, MATH BIOSCI, V14, P197
R COHEN MA, 1983, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V13, P815
GROSSBERG S, 1968, P NATIONAL ACADEMY S, V59, P368
HASSOUN MH, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P275
HECHTNIELSEN R, 1990, NEUROCOMPUT
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KAMP Y, 1990, RECURSIVE NEURAL NET
KOHONEN T, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P353
KOHONEN T, 1984, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
KOSKO B, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P4947
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
LENZE B, 1998, DISCRETE APPL MATH, V89, P169
LENZE B, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1041
LEUNG CS, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P879
LEUNG CS, 1994, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V24, P791
SHANMUKH K, 1993, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, V3, P2670
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SRINIVASAN V, 1991, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, P2472
WANG T, 1994, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V24, P778
WANG YF, 1990, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V1, P81
WANG YF, 1991, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P559
ZHANG BL, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P864
ZHUANG X, 1992, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P1010
N
23
R
P
SEP
D
P
2001
Y
V
12
L
I
5
S
B
1222
P
E
1226
P
U
ISI:000171123100024
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Stephan, KE
U Magnotta, VA
White, T
Arndt, S
Flaum, M
O'Leary, DS
Andreasen, NC
T Effects of olanzapine on cerebellar functional connectivity in schizophren
I simple motor task
S
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
O
A Background. According to current theories, schizophrenia results from alte
B circuits for fundamental cognitive operations. Consequently, the poorly un
neuroleptic treatment may be explainable by altered functional interaction
'cognitive dysmetria' model hypothesizes that one key structure in these c
investigate the effects of olanzapine on cerebellar functional connectivity (
analysis (SVCA) was used in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) st
task,
Methods. fMRI scans were obtained from six schizophrenic patients under bo
olanzapine-treated conditions and from a matched control group of six heal
time points. SVCAs were performed for anatomically and functionally standardi
cerebellum. SVCA results were then processed by three different randomizat
Results. The analyses revealed that olanzapine caused widespread changes of CF
in prefrontal cortex and mediodorsal thalamus. Significant changes in moto
subtractions within both groups and may thus indicate repetition effects r
Olanzapine 'normalized' the patients' CFC patterns for the right, but not
Conclusion. Even for a simple motor task, olanzapine affects functional inter
and many non-motor brain regions, including elements of the 'cognitive dys
our findings suggest that olanzapine has a stronger differential effect on
cortex and thalamus than in motor structures.
C ALLEN G, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1940
R ANDREASEN NC, 1992, J NEUROPSYCH CLIN N, V4, P125
ANDREASEN NC, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P294
ANDREASEN NC, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P9985
ANDREASEN NC, 1997, LANCET, V349, P1730
ANDREASEN NC, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P1586
ANDREASEN NC, 1999, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V46, P908
ARNDT S, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P1271
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BOECKER H, 1994, BRAIN, V117, P1231
BRANKO VV, 1999, KARDIOLOGIYA, V39, P19
BREIER A, 1999, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V45, P403
BUCHEL C, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P768
BUCHEL C, 1997, HUMAN BRAIN FUNCTION, P127
BUCHSBAUM MS, 1996, AM J PSYCHIAT, V153, P191
BUCKLEY PF, 1997, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V74, P13
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
BULLMORE E, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P289
BULLMORE ET, 1998, SCHIZOPHR RES, V30, P127
CRESPOFACORRO B, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P386
DANOS P, 1998, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V82, P1
DOLAN RJ, 1999, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAN S, V395, P58
FLETCHER P, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P337
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P56
FRISTON KJ, 1995, CLIN NEUROSCI, V3, P89
FRISTON KJ, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P796
FRISTON KJ, 1998, SCHIZOPHR RES, V30, P115
GASER C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P107
HARRISON PJ, 1999, BRAIN 4, V122, P593
HOLMES AP, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P7
HONEY GD, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P13432
HORWITZ B, 1984, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V4, P484
HORWITZ B, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P8939
LANGE N, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P389
LEVITT JJ, 1999, AM J PSYCHIAT, V156, P1105
LIDOW MS, 1991, NEUROSCIENCE, V40, P657
LIU YY, 1999, NATURE, V400, P364
LOWE MJ, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P119
MCGONIGLE DJ, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P708
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P655
MIDDLETON FA, 1994, SCIENCE, V266, P458
MILLER DD, 1997, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V41, P550
MILLER DD, 2001, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V49, P404
NOPOULOS PC, 1999, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V46, P703
OLDFIELD RC, 1971, NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, V9, P97
PAKKENBERG B, 1990, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V47, P1023
PAZOS A, 1987, NEUROSCIENCE, V21, P123
POPKEN GJ, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P9276
RABEHESKETH S, 1997, STAT METHODS MED RES, V6, P215
RICHARD FJ, 1999, BIOL REPROD, V60, P10
ROLAND PE, 1998, BRAIN RES REV, V26, P87
SCHRODER J, 1995, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V167, P197
TALAIRACH J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC
WEINBERGER DR, 1980, AM J PSYCHIAT, V137, P359
WENZ F, 1994, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P975
WISER AK, 1998, NEUROREPORT, V9, P1895
WOODS RP, 1992, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V16, P620
N
59
R
P
AUG
D
P
2001
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
C
R
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
P
N
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
31
6
1065
1078
ISI:000170503800011
J
Almeida, R
Ledberg, A
A spatially constrained clustering algorithm with no prior knowledge of the n
NEUROIMAGE
BAUMGARTNER R, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1094
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
MOSER E, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1102
5
JUN
2001
13
6
Part 2 Suppl. S
S61
S61
ISI:000169106300062
P
J
T
A Moller, U
U Ligges, M
Grunling, C
Georgiewa, P
Kaiser, WA
Witte, H
Blanz, B
T
Pitfalls in the clustering of neuroimage data and improvements by global o
I
S
NEUROIMAGE
O
A In this paper, we examined three vector quantization (VQ) methods used for th
B (clustering) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Classif
volume element (voxel), according to a given scanning raster, was assigned
on similarity of the fMRI signal patterns. It was investigated how the VQ
that describes the region involved in a particular brain function. As an e
stimulated by a word comparison task. VQ analysis methodology was verified
patterns. It was demonstrated in detail that VQ based on global rather tha
objective function yielded a higher performance. Performance was measured in
of VQ attempts using several indices for goodness, reliability and efficiency
it was shown that a poor local optimization caused either an underestimatio
stimulus-induced brain activation. However, this was not observed if the cl
a global optimization strategy. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
C *SPM, STAT PAR MAPP
R ANDERBERG MR, 1982, CLUSTER ANAL APPL
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BRUNSWICK N, 1999, BRAIN 10, V122, P1901
ERBERICH SG, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, S20
EVERITT BS, 1993, CLUSTER ANAL
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P165
GERSHO A, 1997, VECTOR QUANTIZATION
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HAIG AR, 1995, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V94, P288
HARTIGAN JA, 1973, CLUSTERING ALGORITHM
JAIN A, 1988, ALGORITHMS CLUSTERIN
KAUFMAN L, 1990, FINDING GROUPS DATA
KIRKPATRICK S, 1983, SCIENCE, V220, P671
MARCHINI JL, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P366
MOLLER U, 1996, EEG-EMG-Z ELEK ELEKT, V27, P105
MOLLER U, 1998, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V46, P2515
MUZIK O, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P538
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
ORRISON WW, 1995, FUNCTIONAL BRAIN IMA
PHILLIPS WE, 1995, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V13, P277
PRICE CJ, 1997, NEUROIMAGE 1, V5, P261
SIMMONS A, 1996, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V14, P73
SOLIS FJ, 1981, MATH OPNS RES, V6, P19
SPAETH H, 1980, CLUSTER ANAL ALGORIT
SUCKLING J, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P1065
TANG KS, 1998, IEEE SIGNAL PROCESS, P22
UUTELA K, 1998, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V45, P716
WISMULLER A, 1998, BILDVERARBEITUNG MED, P402
ZEGER K, 1992, IEEE T SIGNAL PROCES, V40, P310
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
P
N
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
33
JUL
2001
14
1
Part 1
206
218
ISI:000169498000021
P
J
T
A Sagi, B
U Nemat-Nasser, SC
Kerr, R
Hayek, R
Downing, C
Hecht-Nielsen, R
T
A biologically motivated solution to the cocktail party problem
I
S
NEURAL COMPUTATION
O
A We present a new approach to the cocktail party problem that uses a cortro
B architecture (Hecht-Nielsen, 1998) as the front end of a speech processing
in three important respects. First, our method assumes and exploits detaile
wish to attend to in the cocktail party environment. Second, our goal is to pr
of a pattern recognition system rather than to separate one or more of the mix
the neural network model we employ is more biologically feasible than are
cocktail party problem. Although the focus here is on the cocktail party p
in this study can be applied to other areas of information processing.
C AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
R AMARI S, 1996, ADV NEUR IN, V8, P757
AMARI SI, 1998, P IEEE, V86, P2026
BELL AJ, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P1129
COMON P, 1994, SIGNAL PROCESS, V36, P287
HECHTNIELSEN R, 1998, P ICONIP 98 JAP NEUR, P1459
JAGOTA A, 1998, NEUROCOMPUTING, V19, P35
KOHONEN T, 1996, SELFORGANIZING MAPS
KOUTRAS A, 1999, P ICECS 99 6 IEEE IN, P427
LEE K, 1996, RECENT RES ADV MAN M, P249
LEE TW, 1999, NEURAL COMPUT, V11, P417
LEE TW, 2000, COMPUT MATH APPL, V39, P1
OJA E, 1995, COMPUT INTELL, P83
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
RAUSCHECKER JP, 1998, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V8, P516
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STEINBUCH K, 1963, AUTOMAT MENSCH
VANHULLE M, 1999, P 1999 SIGN PROC SOC, P315
WANG DLL, 1999, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V10, P684
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WILSON MA, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P1055
YEN K, 1997, ICASSP, V2, P859
N
22
R
P
JUL
D
P
2001
Y
V
13
L
I
7
S
B
1575
P
E
1602
P
U
ISI:000169225800006
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Salli, E
U Aronen, HJ
Savolainen, S
Korvenoja, A
Visa, A
T
Contextual clustering for analysis of functional MRI data
I
S
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
O
A We present a contextual clustering procedure for statistical parametric ma
B varying three-dimensional images, The algorithm can be used for the detecti
functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI). An important characteristic o
distribution of background (nonactive area) is known whereas the distribut
not, The developed contextual clustering algorithm divides an SPM into bac
so that the probability of detecting false activations by chance is control
is performed. Unlike the much used voxel-by-voxel testing, neighborhood in
important difference. This is achieved by using a Markov random field prior a
(ICM) algorithm. However, unlike in the conventional use of ICM algorithm,
only on the distribution of background. The results from our simulations and
visual stimulation demonstrate that a better sensitivity is achieved with a gi
to the voxel-by-voxel thresholding technique. The algorithm is computationa
to detect and delineate objects from a noisy background in other applicati
C ARDEKANI BA, 1999, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P101
R BACKFRIEDER W, 1996, PHYS MED BIOL, V41, P1425
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUMGARTNER R, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1094
BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BESAG J, 1974, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V36, P192
BESAG J, 1986, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V48, P259
BOWSHER JE, 1996, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V15, P673
BRAMMER MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P378
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
CONSTABLE RT, 1993, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V11, P451
DESCOMBES X, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P1028
DESCOMBES X, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P340
FORMAN SD, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V33, P636
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V1, P214
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
GEMAN S, 1984, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V6, P721
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HELD K, 1997, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V16, P878
HOLMES AP, 1994, THESIS U GLASGOW GLA
JOHNSON VE, 1994, J AM STAT ASSOC, V89, P230
KITTLER J, 1985, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V23, P855
KLEINSCHMIDT A, 1995, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V6, P238
KUPPUSAMY K, 1997, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V15, P169
KWONG KK, 1995, MAGN RESON QUART, V11, P1
LIANG ZR, 1994, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V13, P441
LOWE MJ, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V37, P723
MARCHINI JL, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P366
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MILTON JS, 1995, INTRO PROBABILITY ST
MOSER E, 1997, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V7, P1102
OGAWA S, 1990, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V87, P9868
RAJAPAKSE JC, 1997, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V16, P176
SONKA M, 1999, IMAGE PROCESSING ANA
SYCHRA JJ, 1994, MED PHYS, V21, P193
VISA A, 1997, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V35, P1307
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P173
XIONG JH, 1996, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V4, P153
ZARAHN E, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P179
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
41
MAY
2001
20
5
403
414
ISI:000169007000004
J
Baumgartner, R
Somorjai, R
Graphical display of fMRI data: visualizing multidimensional space
S
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
O
A Visualization of multidimensional data is an integral part of computationa
B data analysis (EDA). We show how visualization of fMRI time-courses may be
structure. We consider fMRI time-courses (TCs) as points in multidimension
vivo data, we show that minimum spanning tree (MST)-based sequencing of mu
combination with a homogeneity map visualization, allows for effective and
the groups of coactivated time-courses obtained by temporal clustering. Thi
for investigation of brain connectivity. We also suggest a simple overall di
set. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
C ANDREWS DF, 1972, BIOMETRICS, V28, P125
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V12, P240
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
CARPENTER PA, 1999, TOP MAGN RESON IMAG, V10, P16
CHERNOFF H, 1973, J AM STAT ASSOC, V68, P361
CHUANG K, 2000, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V18, P1117
FADILI MJ, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V10, P160
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FRIEDMAN JH, 1979, ANN STAT, V7, P697
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
HARARY F, 1969, GRAPH THEORY
LANGE N, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P389
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MINOTTE M, IN PRESS P ASA SECT
MOSER E, 1999, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V10, P166
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
PISON G, 1999, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V30, P381
RICHTER W, 1997, NEUROREPORT, V8, P3697
SOMORJAI R, 2000, 37 I BIOD
SOMORJAI RL, 1999, 7 ANN M ISMRM PHIL U, P1714
TUKEY J, 1977, EXPLORATORY DATA ANA
WEGMAN EJ, 1990, J AM STAT ASSOC, V85, P664
N
25
R
P
FEB
D
P
2001
Y
V
19
L
I
2
S
B
283
P
E
286
P
U
ISI:000168832800018
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
S
E
C
R
S
Peterson, KL
Artificial neural networks and their use in chemistry
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 16
REVIEWS IN COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY
SCI COMPUTING AUTOMA
*MIN INC, MINITAB STAT SOFTW
*NEURALWARE TECHN, 1995, ADV REF GUID
*NEURALWARE TECHN, 1995, NEUR COMP
*NEURALWARE TECHN, 1995, US NEUR WORKS
*SAS I INC, JMP STAT DISC SOFTW
*SPSS INC, SYSTAT MYSTAT SIGMAS
*VIS NUM INC, PV WAVE
ACKELY DH, 1985, COGNITIVE SCI, V9, P147
ACTON FS, 1959, ANAL STRAIGHT LINE D
ACTON FS, 1970, NUMERICAL METHODS TH
AGATONOVICKUSTRIN S, 1998, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V364, P265
ALEXANDER JA, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P479
ALKON DL, 1990, BIOL CYBERN, V62, P363
ALLANIC AL, 1992, ANAL CHEM, V64, P2618
ALVAGER T, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P335
AMENDOLIA SR, 1998, ANAL CHEM, V70, P1249
AMIT DJ, 1985, PHYS REV A, V32, P1007
ANDERS U, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P309
ANDERSON JA, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P413
ANDERSON JA, 1983, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V13, P799
ANDREWS JM, 1994, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V285, P237
ANZALI S, 1998, PERSPECT DRUG DISCOV, V9, P273
AOYAMA T, 1991, CHEM PHARM BULL, V39, P1222
AOYAMA T, 1992, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V32, P492
BALL JW, 1993, ANAL CHEM, V65, P3615
BALL JW, 1993, ANAL CHEM, V65, P505
BASKIN II, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P715
BASU M, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1027
BAYADA DM, 1999, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, P39
BELL SE, 1993, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V33, P609
BERNARD P, 1998, ANALUSIS, V26, P333
BLANCO M, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P4477
BLANK TB, 1993, ANAL CHEM, V65, P3081
BLANK TB, 1995, J CHEM PHYS, V103, P3129
BOGER Z, 1994, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V34, P576
BOHM G, 1996, BIOPHYS CHEM, V59, P1
BOOTH TD, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, P3879
BORGGAARD C, 1992, ANAL CHEM, V64, P545
BOS M, 1993, ANALYST, V118, P323
BOX GEP, 1976, TIME SERIES ANAL FOR
BROWN CW, 1998, ANAL CHEM, V70, P2983
BULSARI AB, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS CHEM
BURDEN FR, 1997, ANALYST, V122, P1015
BURDEN FR, 1999, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V39, P236
CAMPIANI M, 1999, THEOR CHEM ACC, V101, P21
CAMPMAJO C, 1992, ANALUSIS, V20, P127
CATASUS M, 1995, APPL SPECTROSC, V49, P798
CAUDILL M, 1989, AI EXPERT FEB, P61
CAUDILL M, 1992, UNDERSTANDING NEURAL, V1
CAUDILL M, 1992, UNDERSTANDING NEURAL, V2
CHAN H, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, P2373
CHEN DZ, 1997, COMPUT CHEM, V21, P109
CHEN K, 1998, EUROPHYS LETT, V43, P635
CHEN L, 1997, J AM CHEM SOC, V118, P4033
CHOY WY, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P1086
CIROVIC DA, 1997, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V16, P148
CLEIJ P, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V348, P495
CLEVA C, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V348, P255
CLOUSER DL, 1994, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V295, P221
COHEN MA, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P1866
CUNDARI TR, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P871
CUNDARI TR, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P941
CUNDARI TR, 1998, THEOCHEM-J MOL STRUC, V425, P43
DATHE M, 1996, FRESEN J ANAL CHEM, V356, P17
DERKS EPPA, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V41, P171
DERKS EPPA, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V41, P185
DESPAGNE F, 1998, ANALYST, V123, P157
DESPAGNE F, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V40, P145
DETTMAR HP, 1996, COMPUT CHEM, V20, P261
DEVILLERS J, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P1061
DEVILLERS J, 1996, PRINCIPLES QSAR DRUG, V2
DOMINE D, 1997, J CHEM INF COMPUT SC, V37
DUPRAT AF, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P586
EBERHART RC, 1990, NEURAL NETWORK PC TO
EGHBALDAR A, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P637
ELLING JW, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, A409
ENGELHARDT HL, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P478
FABER K, 1996, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V34, P293
FAHLMAN SE, 1988, CMUCS88162
FORINA M, 1982, ANN CHIM-ROME, V72, P127
FREEMAN JA, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS ALGO
FUKUOKA Y, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1059
FUKUSHIMA K, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P413
GAINES BR, 1987, INT J MAN MACH STUD, V26, P453
GAKH AA, 1997, J INCLUS PHENOM MOL, V27, P201
GARSHER H, 1998, J PHYS CHEM A, V102, P4596
GAZULA S, 1992, NUCL PHYS A, V540, P1
GERNOTH KA, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS, V8, P291
GNANADESIKAN R, 1977, METHODS STAT DATA AN
GOBBURU JVS, 1995, J LIQ CHROMATOGR, V18, P1957
GOODACRE R, 1994, ANAL CHEM, V66, P1070
GOODACRE R, 1995, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V313, P25
GOODACRE R, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V348, P511
GORMAN RP, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P75
GRECO G, 1997, REV COMP CH, V11, P183
GROSSBERG S, 1976, BIOL CYBERN, V23, P187
GROSSBERG S, 1985, PERCEPT PSYCHOPHYS, V38, P141
GROSSBERG S, 1985, PSYCHOL REV, V92, P173
GUPTA A, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1127
HAMBURG JH, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P544
HANLEY JA, 1983, RADIOLOGY, V148, P839
HANSEN LK, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P1223
HARRINGTON PD, 1994, ANAL CHEM, V66, P802
HARTNETT M, 1993, ANALYST, V118, P347
HASSIBI B, 1993, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V5, P164
HAVEL J, 1998, J CHROMATOGR A, V793, P317
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HECHTNIELSEN R, P IEEE 1 INT C NEUR, V3, P11
HECHTNIELSEN R, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P4979
HECHTNIELSEN R, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P131
HECHTNIELSEN R, 1990, NEUROCOMPUTING
HERTZ J, 1991, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HERVAS C, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P1119
HINTON G, 1988, P 1987 IEEE C NEUR I, P358
HINTZMADSEN M, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1659
HOAGLIN DC, 1983, UNDERSTANDING ROBUST
HONGMEI W, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, P699
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HOSSEINI M, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P1129
ISU Y, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P286
IVANCIUC O, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P644
IVANCIUC O, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P587
JACOBS RA, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P295
JACOBSSON SP, 1993, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V284, P137
JAGEMANN KU, 1995, Z PHYS CHEM, V191, P179
JOHNSON SR, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, P4641
JUDSON R, 1997, REV COMP CH, V10, P1
JURS PC, 1990, REV COMPUTATIONAL CH, V1, P169
KANERVA P, 1986, AIP CONF P, V151, P247
KANERVA P, 1988, SPARSE DISTRIBUTED M
KLAWUN C, 1994, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V34, P984
KLAWUN C, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P374
KLAWUN C, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P69
KOCJANCIC R, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P985
KOHONEN T, 1988, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
KOVALISHYN VV, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P651
LECHUN Y, 1990, ADV NEURAL PROCESSIN, V2, P598
LEHKY SR, 1988, NATURE, V333, P452
LENZE B, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1041
LEONARD JA, 1992, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V3, P624
LI Z, 1993, ANAL CHEM, V65, P393
LIN HL, 1996, ANAL LETT, V29, P341
LIPPMAN RP, 1987, 769 MIT
LIU L, 1999, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V39, P133
LIVINGSTONE DJ, 1997, J COMPUT AID MOL DES, V11, P135
LOHNINGER H, 1992, FRESEN J ANAL CHEM, V344, P186
LOHNINGER H, 1993, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V33, P736
LUINGE HJ, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V345, P173
MACKAY DJC, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P415
MADDALENA DJ, 1995, J MED CHEM, V38, P715
MAGALLANES JF, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P605
MAGELSSEN GR, 1997, J CHROMATOGR A, V775, P231
MAGGIORA GM, 1992, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V32, P732
MAJCEN N, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P2154
MAREN AJ, 1990, HDB NEURAL COMPUTING
MARENGO E, 1998, J CHROMATOGR A, V799, P47
MASSART DL, 1988, CHEMOMETRICS TXB
MASTERS T, 1993, PRACTICAL NEURAL NET
MASTERS T, 1994, SIGNAL IMAGE PROCESS
MASTERS T, 1995, ADV ALGORITHMS NEURA
MATTHEWS BW, 1975, BIOCHIM BIOPHYS ACTA, V405, P442
MCCLISH DK, 1987, MED DECIS MAKING, V7, P149
MCCULLOCH W, 1943, B MATH BIOPHYS, V7, P115
MEHLMAN SA, 1998, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V371, P117
MEISTRELL ML, 1989, P 13 ANN S COMP APPL, P295
MINAI AA, 1990, INT JOINT C NEURAL N, V1, P676
MINSKY M, 1969, PERCEPTRONS
MINSKY VA, 1989, J NEURAL NETWORKS CO, V1, P14
MITTERMAYR CR, 1994, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V294, P227
MOODY J, 1989, NEURAL COMPUT, V1, P281
MORRISON DF, 1976, MULTIVARIATE STAT ME
MOSTELLER F, 1977, DATA ANAL REGRESSION
MOZER MC, 1989, ADV NEURAL INFORMATI, V1, P107
MULHOLLAND M, 1995, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V30, P117
MUNK ME, 1991, MIKROCHIM ACTA, V2, P505
MUNK ME, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P231
MUNK ME, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P997
MUNOZCARO C, 1998, COMPUT CHEM, V22, P355
NORD LI, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V44, P153
NOVIC M, 1995, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V35, P454
OJA E, 1982, J MATH BIOL, V15, P267
OLIVEROS E, 1998, ANALUSIS, V26, P326
OPREA TI, 1997, REV COMP CH, V11, P127
OTTO M, 1992, PURE APPL CHEM, V64, P497
PERETTO P, 1984, BIOL CYBERN, V50, P51
PETERSON KL, 1991, PHYS REV A, V44, P126
PETERSON KL, 1992, ANAL CHEM, V64, P379
PETERSON KL, 1995, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V35, P896
POLANSKI J, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P694
POLANSKI J, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P553
POMPE M, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V348, P215
POMPE M, 1999, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V39, P59
POPPI RJ, 1998, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V375, P187
QUIAN N, 1988, J MOL BIOL, V202, P865
REED R, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P740
REMOLA JA, 1996, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V15, P137
RICARD D, 1993, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V33, P202
ROSENBLATT F, 1958, PSYCHOL REV, V65, P386
ROSENBLATT F, 1962, PRINCIPLES NEURODYNA
RUBNER J, 1989, EUROPHYS LETT, V10, P693
RUBNER J, 1990, BIOL CYBERN, V62, P193
RUISANCHEZ I, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P214
RUMELHART D, 1986, PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED, V1
RUMELHART D, 1986, PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED, V2
RUMELHART DE, 1985, COGNITIVE SCI, V9, P75
SACCHERO G, 1998, J CHROMATOGR A, V799, P35
SAITO K, 1988, P IEEE INT C NEURAL, V1, P255
SAMAD T, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS S, V1, P216
SANCHEZ MS, 1996, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V33, P101
SANCHEZ MS, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V348, P533
SBIRRAZZUOLI N, 1993, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V1, P229
SCHIERLE C, 1992, FRESEN J ANAL CHEM, V343, P561
SCHIFFMAN SS, 1981, INTRO MULTIDIMENSION
SCHLICK T, 1992, REV COMPUTATIONAL CH, V3, P1
SCHULZ H, 1995, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V316, P145
SCHULZE HG, 1994, APPL SPECTROSC, V48, P50
SCHUUR J, 1997, ANAL CHEM, V69, P2398
SEJNOWSKI TJ, 1987, COMPLEX SYSTEMS, V1, P145
SHANKER MS, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P35
SIGMAN ME, 1994, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V34, P617
SIMPSON M, 1993, ANALYST, V118, P1293
SIMPSON PK, 1990, ARTIFICIAL NEURAL SY
SOMMER FT, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P281
SONG XH, 1999, ANAL CHEM, V71, P860
SPECHT DF, 1990, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V1, P111
SPECHT DF, 1991, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V2, P568
STANFILL C, 1986, COMMUN ACM, V29, P1229
SUMPTER BG, 1994, ANNU REV PHYS CHEM, V45, P439
SUMPTER BG, 1996, ANNU REV MATER SCI, V26, P223
SUTTER JM, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P100
SVOZIL D, 1995, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V35, P924
SVOZIL D, 1997, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V39, P43
SZU H, 1987, PHYS LETT A, V122, P157
SZU HH, 1987, P IEEE, V75, P1538
TAFEIT E, 1996, J MOL GRAPHICS, V14, P12
TAJINE M, 1998, NEURAL NETWORKS, V11, P1571
TETKO IV, 1994, J MED CHEM, V37, P2520
TETKO IV, 1995, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V35, P826
TETKO IV, 1996, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V36, P794
TETKO IV, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P660
TETTEH J, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V41, P17
TOMINAGA Y, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P867
TORRIERI D, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P419
TURNER BE, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P639
VANDAELE W, 1983, APPL TIME SERIES BOX
VENTURA S, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P1521
VENTURA S, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P4458
VENTURA S, 1997, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V37, P517
VISSER T, 1994, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V296, P141
WABUYELE BW, 1994, ANAL CHEM, V66, P2047
WABUYELE BW, 1995, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V29, P51
WALCZAK B, 1993, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V283, P508
WALCZAK B, 1996, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V322, P21
WALCZAK B, 1998, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V41, P1
WANG JH, 1996, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V34, P109
WANG XZ, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P457
WANG ZY, 1995, ANAL CHEM, V67, P1497
WARR WA, 1993, ANAL CHEM, V65, A1087
WASSERMAN PD, 1989, NEURAL COMPUTING THE
WEBB AR, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS, V12, P339
WEIGEL UM, 1992, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V32, P723
WESSEL MD, 1998, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V38, P726
WEST GMJ, 1995, J CHEM INF COMP SCI, V35, P806
WIDROW B, 1959, 1959 WESCON CONV R 4, P74
WIDROW B, 1960, 1960 IRE WESCON CONV, P96
WIDROW B, 1988, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, V36, P1109
WIDROW B, 1990, INTRO NEURAL ELECT N, P149
WIENKE D, 1994, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V291, P1
WIENKE D, 1995, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V310, P1
WIENKE D, 1995, TRAC-TREND ANAL CHEM, V14, P398
WIKEL JH, 1993, BIOORG MED CHEM LETT, V3, P645
WONG CF, 1998, REV COMP CH, V12, P281
WU C, 1997, APPL INTELL, V7, P27
XING WL, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V349, P283
YAN AZ, 1998, COMPUT CHEM, V22, P405
YANG HS, 1999, ANAL CHEM, V71, P751
ZHANG L, 1997, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V344, P29
ZHAO WX, 1998, COMPUT CHEM, V22, P385
ZUPAN J, 1993, NEURAL NETWORKS CHEM
ZUPAN J, 1995, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V27, P175
ZUPAN J, 1997, CHEMOMETR INTELL LAB, V38, P1
N
R
P
Y
V
L
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
282
2000
16
53
140
ISI:000166066000002
P
J
T
A Sporns, O
U Tononi, G
Edelman, GM
T
Connectivity and complexity: the relationship between neuroanatomy and bra
I
S
NEURAL NETWORKS
O
A Nervous systems facing complex environments have to balance two seemingly
B there is a need quickly and reliably to extract important features from sensor
by functionally segregated (specialized) sets of neurons, e.g. those found
Second, there is a need to generate coherent perceptual and cognitive states a
to objects and events, which represent conjunctions of numerous individual
accomplished by functional integration of the activity of specialized neur
interactions. These interactions produce patterns of temporal correlations
involving distributed neuronal populations, both within and across cortica
computational studies suggest that changes in functional connectivity may
and cognitive states and involve the integration of information across spe
The interplay between functional segregation and integration can be quantitat
from statistical information theory, in particular by defining a measure of
measures the extent to which a pattern of functional connectivity produced by
system combines the dual requirements of functional segregation and integr
neuroanatomical motifs are uniquely associated with high levels of complex
embedded in the pattern of long-range cortico-cortical pathways linking segr
cerebral cortex. Our theoretical findings offer new insight into the intri
connectivity and complexity in the nervous system. (C) 2000 Elsevier Scien
C ALAIS D, 1998, NAT NEUROSCI, V1, P160
R BLAKE R, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P7115
BRESSLER SL, 1993, NATURE, V366, P153
BUCHEL C, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P768
CHERNIAK C, 1995, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V18, P522
CLASSEN J, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P1567
DECHARMS RC, 1996, NATURE, V381, P610
DECHARMS RC, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P15166
DING M, 2000, IN PRESS BIOL CYBERN
DONOGHUE JP, 1998, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V79, P159
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
EDELMAN GM, 1974, STUDIES PHILOS BIOL, P45
EDELMAN GM, 1978, MINDFUL BRAIN, P51
EDELMAN GM, 1987, NEURAL DARWINISM
EDELMAN GM, 2000, UNIVERSE CONSCIOUSNE
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FELLEMAN DJ, 1991, CEREB CORTEX, V1, P1
FLANNERY KV, 1972, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V3, P399
FRIES P, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P12699
FRISTON KJ, 1994, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P56
FRISTON KJ, 1996, CEREB CORTEX, V6, P156
GAWNE TJ, 1999, CRIT REV NEUROBIOL, V13, P83
GILBERT CD, 1989, J NEUROSCI, V9, P2432
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
GRAY CM, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P1698
GRAY CM, 1999, NEURON, V24, P31
HILGETAG CC, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P91
HIRSCH JA, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P1800
HUBERMAN BA, 1986, PHYSICA D, V22, P376
KANISZA G, 1979, ORG VISION
KONIG P, 1993, EUR J NEUROSCI, V5, P501
KONIG P, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P130
KOTTER R, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P127
KREITER AK, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P2381
LOWEL S, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P209
LUMER ED, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P207
LUMER ED, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P228
MARKRAM H, 1997, SCIENCE, V275, P213
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P655
MCINTOSH AR, 1999, SCIENCE, V284, P1531
MITCHISON G, 1991, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V245, P151
MOUNTCASTLE VB, 1998, PERCEPTUAL NEUROSCIE
MURTHY VN, 1996, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V76, P3968
RIEHLE A, 1997, SCIENCE, V278, P950
RINGO JL, 1991, BRAIN BEHAV EVOLUT, V38, P1
ROELFSEMA PR, 1997, NATURE, V385, P157
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P277
SIMON HA, 1961, ECONOMETRICA, V29, P111
SPORNS O, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P7265
SPORNS O, 1991, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V88, P129
SPORNS O, 2000, CEREB CORTEX, V10, P127
SRINIVASAN R, 1999, J NEUROSCI, V19, P5435
STEINMETZ PN, 2000, NATURE, V404, P187
STEPHAN KE, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V355, P111
TALLONBAUDRY C, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P4244
TAYLOR JG, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V9, P165
TONONI G, 1992, CEREB CORTEX, V2, P310
TONONI G, 1994, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V91, P5033
TONONI G, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P3422
TONONI G, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V7, P133
TONONI G, 1998, TRENDS COGN SCI, V2, P474
TONONI G, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P3257
TREISMAN A, 1996, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V6, P171
VAADIA E, 1995, NATURE, V373, P515
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1995, CURR OPIN NEUROBIOL, V5, P520
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1999, NEURON, V24, P95
WANG DL, 1997, NEURAL COMPUT, V9, P805
WATTS DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440
ZEKI S, 1993, VISION BRAIN
ZHANG LI, 1998, NATURE, V395, P37
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
71
OCT-NOV
2000
13
8-9
S
B
909
P
E
922
P
U
ISI:000166070200008
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Megalooikonomou, V
U Ford, J
Shen, L
Makedon, F
Saykin, A
T
Data mining in brain imaging
I
S
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
O
A Data mining in brain imaging is proving to be an effective methodology for dis
B This, together with the rapid accumulation of massive heterogeneous data s
efficient methods that filter, clarify, assess, correlate and cluster brai
we present data mining methods that have been or could be employed in the an
methods address two types of brain imaging data: structural and functional. We
that aid the discovery of interesting associations and patterns between br
data. We consider several applications of these methods, such as the analy
lesion-deficit, and structure morphological variability; the development o
tumour analysis. We include examples of applications to real brain data. Sev
as that of method validation or verification, are also discussed.
C AGRAWAL R, 1993, FDN DATA ORG ALGORIT
R AGRAWAL R, 1993, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN, V5, P914
ALEN L, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P933
ALI WSI, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P957
ANDERSEN E, 1997, INTRO STAT ANAL CATE
ANDERSON SW, 1990, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V47, P397
ARYA M, 1996, COMPUT MED IMAG GRAP, V20, P269
ASHBURNER J, 1997, CLIN MRI DEV MR, V7, P26
ASHBURNER J, 2000, NEUROIMAGE 1, V11, P805
BAHN MM, 1999, J MAGN RESON, V137, P33
BANDETTINI PA, 1993, MAGNET RESON MED, V30, P161
BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUMGARTNER R, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P1525
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V11, P228
BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BESL PJ, 1992, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V14, P239
BIHAN DL, 1996, NEURORADIOLOGY, V23, P1
BOOKSTEIN FL, 1989, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V11, P567
BOOKSTEIN FL, 1996, B MATH BIOL, V58, P313
BOSCH V, 2000, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V11, P61
BOUCKAERT R, 1994, 10 C UNC ART INT SEA
BRAMMER MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P378
BRODMANN K, 1960, SOME PAPERS CEREBRAL, P201
BRYAN RN, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1625
BRYAN RN, 1997, RADIOLOGY, V202, P47
BUCHEL C, 1999, SCIENCE, V283, P1538
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
BURGEL U, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P489
CASEY BJ, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P249
CHANG MM, 1996, OPT ENG, V35, P3206
COHEN FS, 1998, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V45, P642
COHEN J, 1987, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
COHEN MS, 1999, JMRI-J MAGN RESON IM, V10, P33
COLLINS DL, 1994, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V18, P192
COLLINS DL, 1997, INT J PATTERN RECOGN, V11, P1271
CONSTABLE RT, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P289
COOPER GF, 1992, MACH LEARN, V9, P309
COULON O, 1999, 16 INT C INF PROC ME, P448
CRESSIE N, 1993, STAT SPATIAL DATA
CSERNANSKY JG, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P11406
DAMASIO H, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN ANATOMY
DAVATZIKOS C, 1996, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V20, P88
DAVATZIKOS C, 1997, COMPUT VIS IMAGE UND, V66, P207
DAVATZIKOS C, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P635
DELISI L, 1991, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PSYC, P147
DESCOMBES X, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P1028
DESCOMBES X, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P340
EDEN M, 1961, 4 BERK S MATH STAT P
ENBANK R, 1988, SPLINE SMOOTHING NON
EVANS AC, 1988, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V8, P513
EVANS AC, 1991, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V11, P69
FADILI MJ, 1998, P ANN INT IEEE E 1-6, V20, P696
FALOUTSOS C, 1995, ACM SIGMOD C MAN DAT
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FISHER LD, 1993, BIOSTATISTICS METHOD
FORMAN SD, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V33, P636
FOX PT, 1988, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V8, P642
FOX PT, 1989, J NUCL MED, V30, P141
FOX PT, 1989, SEMIN NEUROL, V9, P323
FOX PT, 1991, J CEREB BLOOD FLOW M, V11, A79
FRANK LR, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V39, P132
FRISTON K, 1996, BRAIN MAPPING METHOD
FRISTON KJ, 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189
FRISTON KJ, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P346
FRISTON KJ, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P133
FRISTON KJ, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V10, P385
FU Z, 1998, P IPCIP 98 INT C IM, P709
GEE JC, 1993, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V17, P225
GEE JC, 1995, INFORMATION PROCESSI, P113
GERRING JP, 1998, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V37, P647
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GRENANDER U, 1996, STAT COMPUTING GRAPH, V7, P3
GRENANDER U, 1998, Q APPL MATH, V56, P617
GUR RC, 1988, NEUROPSYCHIATRY NEUR, V1, P53
GUR RC, 1988, NEUROPSYCHIATRY NEUR, V1, P87
GUR RC, 1990, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V3, P113
GUTTMAN A, 1984, ACM SIGMOD, P47
HALLER JW, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V199, P787
HARWELL MR, 1997, COMMUN STAT-SIMUL C, V26, P605
HELD K, 1997, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V16, P878
HERSKOVITS E, 1991, THESIS STANFORD U CA
HERSKOVITS EH, 1999, RADIOLOGY, V213, P389
HOLMES AP, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P7
HORWITZ B, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P137
HORWITZ B, 1999, SPIE 9 WORKSH VIRT I
HU MK, 1962, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V8, P179
HUERTA MF, 1993, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V16, P436
JACOBS GA, 2000, J NEUROSCI, V20, P2934
JANSEN M, 1999, MED PHYS, V26, P622
KAMBER M, 1995, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V14, P442
KARTEN HJ, 1999, CONTENT BASED QUERY
KIM B, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P964
KORN F, 1996, SPIE P BOST MA
KOSLOW SH, 1997, NEUROINFORMATICS OVE
KRUGGEL F, 1999, LECT NOTES COMPUTER
KRUGGEL F, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P787
LAM W, 1994, COMPUT INTELL, V10, P269
LAM W, 1998, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V20, P240
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
LARNTZ K, 1978, J AM STAT ASSOC, V73, P253
LEDBERG A, 1998, NEUROIMAGE, V8, P113
LEE CIC, 1994, COMMUN STAT THEORY, V23, P2113
LETOVSKY SI, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P1869
LEVRIER O, 1993, 31 ANN M AM SOC NEUR
LINDEBERG T, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P166
LOWE MJ, 1997, MAGNET RESON MED, V37, P723
LOWE MJ, 1999, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V23, P463
MAAS LC, 1996, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V39, P640
MANNAN M, 1995, BIOMETR J, V37, P409
MAY A, 1999, NAT MED, V5, P836
MAZZIOTTA JC, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P89
MCINTOSH AR, 1996, NEUROIMAGE 1, V3, P143
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
MEGALOOIKONOMOU V, 1999, ACM SIGKDD P SAN DIE, P347
MEGALOOIKONOMOU V, 2000, IN PRESS HUMAN BRAIN
MEGALOOIKONOMOU V, 2000, MED DATA MINING KNOW
MILLER M, 1997, STAT METHODS MED RES, V6, P267
MILLER MI, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P11944
MINOSHIMA S, 1994, J NUCL MED, V35, P949
MITCHELL TM, 1999, COMMUN ACM, V42, P31
MOSER E, 1999, INT J IMAG SYST TECH, V10, P166
MUMMERY CJ, 1999, BRAIN 1, V122, P61
MUMMERY CJ, 2000, ANN NEUROL, V47, P36
NARR K, 1999, 5 INT C FUNCT MAPP H
NELSON MD, 1998, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V55, P433
NIELSEN FA, 1999, NIPS 99 DENV COL
NOWINSKI WL, 1997, COMPUT AIDED SURG, V2, P42
OGAWA S, 1998, ANNU REV BIOPH BIOM, V27, P447
OLUYEDE BO, 1994, CAN J STAT, V22, P75
ONO M, 1990, ATLAS CEREBRAL SULCI
OSIUS G, 1992, J AM STAT ASSOC, V87, P1145
OWEN CB, 1998, MULTIPLE MEDIA CORRE
OWEN CB, 1999, SYNCHRONIZATION MULT
PAL NR, 1993, PATTERN RECOGN, V26, P1277
PEARL J, 1986, ARTIF INTELL, V29, P241
PEARL J, 1988, PROBABILISTIC REASON
POLINE JB, 1994, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V14, P639
POLINE JB, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P83
PURDON PL, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P239
QUINLAN JR, 1986, MACH LEARN, V1, P81
RAJAPAKSE JC, 1997, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V16, P176
RANGARAJAN A, 1997, INFORMATION PROCESSI, P29
RANGARAJAN A, 1997, MED IMAGE ANAL, V4, P379
RAZ J, 1999, WAVELET APPL SIGNAL, V8
RINGWALD M, 1994, SCIENCE, V265, P2033
RISSANEN J, 1978, AUTOMATICA, V14, P465
ROSSMANITH C, 1996, 4 INT C VIS BIOM COM, P429
RUTTIMANN UE, 1998, IEEE T MED IMAGING, V17, P142
SADJADI FA, 1980, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V2, P127
SHOLL DA, 1953, J ANAT, V87, P387
SHU Y, 1999, 29 ANN M SOC NEUR MI
SIJBERS J, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P1533
SKUDLARSKI P, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P311
SSEN DV, 1983, TRENDS NEUROLOGICAL, V6, P370
STROTHER S, 1995, J CEREBRAL FLOW META, V15, P355
SVENSEN M, 1999, 2 INT WORKSH EN MIN, P317
SYMANZIK J, 1999, COMPUTING SCI STAT, V31, P445
TALAIRACH J, 1967, ATLAS ANATOMIE STERE
TALAIRACH J, 1988, COPLANAR STEREOTAXIC
TANIZAKI H, 1997, J APPL STAT, V24, P603
TEGELER C, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P267
TEH CH, 1988, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V10, P496
THACKER NA, 1999, PHYSIOL MEAS, V20, P251
THOMAS RG, 1992, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V13, P134
THOMPSON P, 2000, BRAIN MAPPING DISORD
THOMPSON PM, 1996, J NEUROSCI, V16, P4261
THOMPSON PM, 1996, NEUROIMAGE, V3, P19
THOMPSON PM, 1997, MED IMAGE ANAL, V1, P271
THOMPSON PM, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P492
THOMPSON PM, 2000, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V9, P81
TOGA AW, 1995, BRAIN RES BULL, V38, P77
TSUKIMOTO H, 1998, DISC SCI 1 INT C, P198
TURKHEIMER E, 1990, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V12, P549
VANNIER MW, 1987, CRC CRIT R BIOMED EN, V15, P117
WIBLE CG, 1997, PSYCHIAT RES-NEUROIM, V76, P29
WILLIAMS BS, 1996, COMPUT MED IMAG GRAP, V20, P433
WORSLEY KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P183
WORSLEY KJ, 1996, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V4, P58
WORSLEY KJ, 1996, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V4, P74
WORSLEY KJ, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V6, P305
WORSLEY KJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P364
WORTH A, 1997, INT J PATTERN RECOGN, V11, P116
ZAROUBI S, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P59
ZHANG YJ, 1996, PATTERN RECOGN, V29, P1335
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
187
AUG
2000
9
4
359
394
ISI:000165055200004
E
R
P
J
T
A Baumgartner, R
U Somorjai, R
Summers, R
Richter, W
Ryner, L
T
Novelty indices: identifiers of potentially interesting time-courses in fu
I
S
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
O
A In a systematic study of hybrid MR time-series with simulated "activation" (
B we investigated the power and compared the ability of the "novelty indices
and 1-lag autocorrelation, to discriminate between potentially interesting
uninteresting ("noisy") tirne-courses (TCs). NIs may he employed as preproc
the interesting TCs prior to any further exploratory or confirmatory approa
Inc. All rights reserved.
C BAUMGARTNER R, 2000, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V18, P89
R BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
COHEN J, 1968, PSYCHOL BULL, V70, P213
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER TW, 1999, SKIN PHARMACOL APPL, V12, P1
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
HALLIN M, 1992, ANN STAT, V20, P523
HYVARINEN A, 1998, ADV NEUR IN, V10, P273
HYVARINEN A, 1999, NEURAL COMPUTING SUR, V2, P94
JARMASZ M, 1998, 6 SCI M SOC MAGN RES, V3, P2068
KENDALL M, 1994, ADV THEORY STAT, V1, P74
KOEHLER B, 1999, 1 INT WORKSH IND COM, P359
LANGE N, 1997, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V46, P1
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
MAKEIG S, 1998, TRENDS COG SCI, V2, P10
MCKEOWN M, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P160
MOLGEDEY L, 1994, PHYS REV LETT, V72, P3634
SCHIESSL I, 2000, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V47, P573
SIJBERS A, 1998, THESIS U ANTWERP
SOMORJAI R, 1999, 5 SCI M ISMRM PHIL U, P1718
SOMORJAI R, 1999, NEUROIMAGE S, V9, P45
STETTER M, 2000, NEUROIMAGE, V11, P482
ZIEHE A, 1998, P INT C ART NEUR NET, P675
ZIEHE A, 2000, IEEE T BIO-MED ENG, V47, P75
N 25
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
SEP
2000
18
7
845
850
ISI:000089692500010
P
J
T
A Bolle, D
U Dominguez, DRC
Amari, S
T
Mutual information of sparsely coded associative memory with self-control
I
S
NEURAL NETWORKS
O
A The influence of a macroscopic time-dependent threshold on the retrieval dyna
B memory models with ternary neurons {-1,0,+1} is examined. If the threshold
function of the cross-talk noise and of the activity of the memorized patterns
in the course of the time evolution, it guarantees an autonomous functionin
the limit of sparse coding, it is found that this self-control mechanism cons
of the fixed-point retrieval dynamics, in particular the storage capacity,
the information content. The mutual information is shown to be the relevant pa
quality of such sparsely coded models. Numerical results confirm these obs
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
C AMARI S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P63
R AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
AMARI SI, 1977, BIOL CYBERN, V26, P175
AMIT DJ, 1987, PHYS REV A, V35, P2293
ARENZON JJ, 1994, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V27, P5161
BLAHUT RE, 1990, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
BOLLE D, 1993, J STAT PHYS, V70, P1099
BOLLE D, 1994, J STAT PHYS, V74, P565
BOUTEN M, 1993, PHYS REV E, V47, P1397
BUHMANN J, 1989, PHYS REV A, V39, P2689
DERRIDA B, 1987, EUROPHYS LETT, V4, P167
DOMINGUEZ DRC, 1998, PHYS REV LETT, V80, P2961
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HERTZ J, 1991, INTRO THEORY NEURAL
HORN D, 1989, PHYS REV A, V40, P1036
HORNER H, 1989, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V75, P133
KITANO K, 1998, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V31, L613
NADAL JP, 1998, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V9, P207
OKADA M, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS, V8, P833
OKADA M, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P1429
PEREZVICENTE CJ, 1989, EUROPHYS LETT, V10, P621
RIEGER H, 1990, J PHYS A, V23, L1273
SCHULTZ S, 1998, PHYS REV E B, V57, P3302
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379
SHIM GM, 1997, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V30, P2637
TSODYKS MV, 1988, EUROPHYS LETT, V7, P203
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
YEDIDIA JS, 1989, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V22, P2265
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
29
MAY-JUN
2000
13
4-5
455
462
ISI:000088567000005
P
J
T
A Baumgartner, R
U Somorjai, R
Summers, R
Richter, W
Ryner, L
Jarmasz, M
T
I
S
O
A
B
Resampling as a cluster validation technique in fMRI
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Exploratory, data-driven analysis approaches such as cluster analysis, pri
independent component analysis, or neural network-based techniques are com
methods. They may be considered as hypothesis generating methods. The repr
produce may be viewed as alternative hypotheses to the null hypothesis, ie
here a resampling technique to validate the results of exploratory fuzzy clu
an alternative hypothesis is represented by a cluster centroid. For both sim
magnetic resonance imaging data, we show that by permutation-based resampl
may be computed for each voxel belonging to a cluster of interest without
assumptions. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
C BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1999, IN PRESS MAGN RESON
BAUMGARTNER R, 1999, NEUROIMAGE S, V9, P49
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BULLMORE E, 1996, MAGNET RESON MED, V35, P261
CARPENTER PA, 1999, TOP MAGN RESON IMAG, V10, P16
DEZDEK J, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FORD I, 1995, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V15, P371
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GOOD P, 1993, SPRINGER SERIES STAT
GORDON HL, 1992, PROTEINS, V14, P249
GOUTTE HC, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
GRISWOLD M, 1999, P ISMRM PHIL PA, P1707
HOLMES AP, 1996, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V16, P7
JARMASZ M, 1998, P ISMRM 6 ANN M SYDN, P2068
LANGE N, 1997, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V46, P1
LANGE N, 1999, NEUROIMAGE 1, V10, P282
MCKEOWN MJ, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V6, P160
NGAN SC, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P939
SCARTH GB, 1995, P INT SOC MAGN RES M, P238
SOMORJAI R, 1999, NEUROIMAGE S, V9, P45
SOMORJAI R, 1999, NEUROIMAGE S, V9, P46
N
24
R
P
FEB
D
P
2000
Y
V
11
L
I
2
S
B
228
P
E
231
P
U
ISI:000086078100023
T
E
R
P
J
T
A Baumgartner, R
U Ryner, L
Richter, W
Summers, R
Jarmasz, M
Somorjai, R
T Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy cluste
I analysis
S
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
O
A Exploratory data-driven methods such as Fuzzy clustering analysis (FCA) and
B (PCA) may be considered as hypothesis-generating procedures that are comple
statistical inferential methods in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMR
FCA and PCA is presented in a systematic fMRI study, with MR data acquired un
no activation, with different noise contributions and simulated, varying "
contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio ranged between 1-10. We found that if fMRI d
noise only, FCA and PCA show comparable performance. In the presence of othe
(e.g., physiological noise), FCA outperforms PCA in the entire CNR range of i
for low CNR values. The comparison method that we introduced may be used t
approaches such as independent component analysis or neural network-based te
2000. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
C BASILEVSKI A, 1994, STAT FACTOR ANAL REL
R BAUMGARTNER R, 1998, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V16, P115
BAUNE A, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P477
BEZDEK J, 1981, PATTERN RECOGNITION
CONSTABLE RT, 1995, MAGNET RESON MED, V34, P57
FILZMOSER P, 1999, MAGN RESON IMAGING, V17, P817
FISCHER H, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V41, P124
FORD I, 1995, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V15, P371
FRISTON KJ, 1993, J CEREBR BLOOD F MET, V13, P5
FRISTON KJ, 1995, NEUROIMAGE, V2, P45
GOLAY X, 1998, MAGNET RESON MED, V40, P249
GORDON HL, 1992, PROTEINS, V14, P249
GOUTTE C, 1999, NEUROIMAGE, V9, P298
JARMASZ M, 1998, 6 SCI M SOC MAGN RES, V3, P2068
KOHONEN T, 1995, SELF ORG MAPS
LANGE N, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P389
LANGE N, 1997, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V46, P1
MCKEOWN M, 1998, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V3, P160
SAMAL M, 1998, NUCL MED COMMUN, V19, P161
SCARTH G, 1995, 12 ANN M SOC MAGN RE, V1, P238
SCARTH G, 1996, 4 SCI M SOC MAGN RES, V3, P1782
SIJBERS A, 1998, THESIS U ANTWERP
SOMORJAI R, 1999, 7 SCI M SOC MAGN RES, P1718
SYCHRA JJ, 1994, MED PHYS, V21, P193
ZARAHN E, 1997, NEUROIMAGE, V5, P179
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
25
JAN
2000
18
1
89
94
ISI:000084587200010
J
Liou, CY
Yuan, SK
Error tolerant associative memory
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
We present a new approach to enlarging the basin of attraction of associat
auto-associative memory and temporal associative memory. The memory traine
tolerate and recover from seriously noisy patterns. Simulations show that thi
the number of limit cycles.
C BRUCK J, 1990, P IEEE, V78, P1579
R COVER TM, 1965, IEEE T ELECTRON COMP, V14, P326
KOSKO B, 1987, APPL OPTICS, V26, P4947
KOSKO B, 1988, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V18, P49
LITTLE WA, 1974, MATH BIOSCI, V19, P101
LITTLE WA, 1975, BEHAVIORAL BIOL, V14, P115
MAZZA C, 1997, NEURAL NETWORKS, V10, P593
PORAT S, 1989, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P335
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
TANK DW, 1987, SCI AM, V257, P104
XU ZB, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P483
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
11
OCT
1999
81
4
331
342
ISI:000083208800005
J
Slorkey, AJ
Valabregue, R
The basins of attraction of a new Hopfield learning rule
NEURAL NETWORKS
The nature of the basins of attraction of a Hopfield network is as importan
learning rule is re-introduced. This learning rule has a higher capacity th
still keeps important functionality, such as incrementality and locality, wh
However the basins of attraction of the fixed points of this learning rule ha
important characteristics of basins of attraction are considered: indirect an
distribution of sizes of basins of attraction and the shape of the basins o
the new learning rule are compared with those of the Hebb rule. The size o
of attractions are generally larger for the new rule than for the Hebb rul
is more even, and the shape of the basins more round. (C) 1999 Elsevier Scie
C AMARI S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P63
R CHANG JY, 1993, ELECTRON LETT, V29, P2128
FORREST BM, 1988, J PHYS A, V21, P245
GRIMMETT GR, 1982, PROBABILITY RANDOM P
HO AMCL, 1995, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V930, P202
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HORNER H, 1989, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V76, P381
KANTER I, 1987, PHYS REV A, V35, P380
KRAUTH W, 1987, J PHYS A, V20, L745
MCELIECE RJ, 1987, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V33, P461
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STORKEY A, 1997, ELECTRON LETT, V33, P1803
STORKEY AJ, 1997, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V1327, P451
STORM G, 1998, CLIN CANCER RES, V4, P111
VIANA L, 1993, J PHYS I, V3, P777
WANG T, 1994, NEURAL NETWORKS, V7, P1379
YAU HW, 1991, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V24, P5639
YAU HW, 1992, PHYSICA A, V185, P471
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
18
JUL
1999
12
6
869
876
ISI:000082104300007
J
Billard, A
Hayes, G
DRAMA, a connectionist architecture for control and learning in autonomous
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR
Adaptation to their environment is a fundamental capability for living agents
could also benefit. This work proposes a connectionist architecture, DRAMA, fo
of autonomous robots. DRAMA stands for dynamical recurrent associative mem
time-delay recurrent neural network, using Hebbian update rules. It allows
regularities and time series in discrete sequences of inputs, in the face of
The first part of this paper gives the mathematical description of the arc
theoretically and through numerical simulations its performance. The secon
on the implementation of DRAMA in simulated and physical robotic experimen
the DRAMA architecture is computationally fast and inexpensive, which makes t
for controlling 'computationally-challenged' robots. In the experiments, av
with very limited computational capability and show that our robot can car
and on-line learning of relatively complex cognitive tasks. In these exper
wander randomly in a fixed environment, collecting information about its elem
information of their sensors and actuators, they learn about physical regu
experience of varying stimuli. The agents learn also from their mutual interact
scenario, based on mutual following of the two agents, to enable transmiss
robot to the other.
C ASADA M, 1997, P 1 INT WORKSH COOP, P127
R BILLAD A, 1998, LEARNING ROBOTS MULT, P79
BILLARD A, ADAPTIVE BEHAV SPEC
BILLARD A, 1996, 43 U ED
BILLARD A, 1997, P 6 EUR WORKSH LEARN, P137
BILLARD A, 1998, CPM9838 CTR POL MOD
BILLARD A, 1998, ROBOT AUTON SYST, V24, P71
BILLARD A, 1998, THESIS U EDINBURGH
BUCKINGHAM J, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P407
CHAUVIN Y, 1995, BACK PROPAGATION THE
DAUTENHAHN K, 1995, ROBOT AUTON SYST, V16, P333
DAY SP, 1993, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V4, P348
ELMAN JL, 1990, COGNITIVE SCI, V14, P179
FLOREANO D, 1996, IEEE T SYST MAN CY B, V26, P396
GAUSSIER P, 1998, APPL ARTIFICIAL INTE, V7
GILES CG, 1994, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V52, P153
GRAHAM B, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P337
GRAHAM B, 1996, P INT C ART NEUR NET, P35
GROSSBERG S, 1992, COGNITIVE BRAIN RES, V1, P3
HATTORI M, 1996, NEUROCOMPUTING, V12, P1
HINTON GE, 1986, PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED, V1, P282
JORDAN MI, 1986, P 8 ANN C COGN SCI S, P531
KLINGSPOR V, 1997, APPL ARTIF INTELL, V11, P719
KOHONEN T, 1989, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
KOLEN JF, 1991, P 13 ANN C COGN SCI, P7
KUIPERS B, 1987, AAAI WORKSH SPAT REA, P774
KURZ A, 1996, IEEE T SYSTEMS, V26, P40
LIN DT, 1993, P WORLD C NEUR NETW, V1, P291
MATARIC MJ, 1997, AUTON ROBOT, V4, P73
MOZER MC, 1993, PREDICTING FUTURE UN
NOLFI S, 1997, ADAPT BEHAV, V5, P343
NORDIN P, 1996, ADAPT BEHAV, V5, P107
OWEN C, 1996, 1 EUR WORKSH ADV MOB
PEARLMUTTER BA, 1995, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V6, P1212
PFEIFER R, 1998, ROBOTICS AUTONOMOUS, P2
PINEDA FJ, 1987, PHYS REV LETT, V59, P2229
RINKUS G, 1995, THESIS BOSTON U MASS
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STEELS L, 1997, P 4 EUR C ART LIF, P473
TANI J, 1997, P 4 EUR C ART LIF, P309
THRUN S, 1996, EXPLANATION BASED NE
TORRANCE MC, 1992, WORK NOT AAAI FALL S
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WYATT J, 1998, ROBOTICS AUTONOMOUS, V1, P41
YANCO H, 1993, ANIMALS ANIMATS, V2, P478
ZIMMER UR, 1996, NEUROCOMPUTING, V13, P247
ZREHEN S, 1995, THESIS SWISS FEDERAL
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
47
WIN
1999
7
1
35
63
ISI:000080413000003
J
Payne, BR
Lomber, SG
A method to assess the functional impact of cerebral connections on target
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
We describe an innovative and tested approach combining two individually p
simultaneously the functional impact of multiple projections on target popula
The rationale is simple: silence a defined set of efferent projections from one
deactivation and then measure the impact of the deactivation on activities in
2-deoxyglucose (2DG). This is a straightforward and sound approach because 2
levels of underlying neural activity. All distant modifications evoked by
efferent projections are examined in anatomical tissue and simultaneously
to provide a global view of the functional impacts of the set of projectio
method, downward adjustments of 2DG uptake levels identify removals of net
upward adjustments identify net removals of suppressive influences. Future po
of the technique, including optical imaging, are discussed. Overall, the t
provide fundamental, new measures on cerebral network interactions that both
static models of cerebral networks and electrophysiological measures of fun
neurons. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
C BLASDEL GG, 1986, NATURE, V321, P579
R BONHOEFFER T, 1996, BRAIN MAPPING METHOD
DEUEL RK, 1984, ANN NEUROL, V15, P521
FRIEDMAN HR, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V66, P543
FRIEDMAN HR, 1989, J NEUROSCI, V9, P4111
GEESAMAN BJ, 1997, CEREB CORTEX, V7, P749
GOLDMANRAKIC PS, 1988, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V11, P137
GONZALEZLIMA F, 1992, ADV METABOLIC MAPPIN
HOF PR, 1995, J COMP NEUROL, V362, P109
HOREL JA, 1991, METHODS NEUROSCIENCE
HUPE JM, 1998, NATURE, V394, P784
HUPE JM, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V86, P129
JOUVE B, 1998, CEREB CORTEX, V8, P28
KOSSLYN SM, 1993, CEREB CORTEX, V3, P567
KUHL DE, 1980, ANN NEUROL, V8, P47
LOMBER SG, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V86, P179
LOWEL S, 1987, J COMP NEUROL, V255, P401
MAEKAWA H, 1993, NEUROSCI RES, V17, P315
MALPELI JG, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V86, P119
MARTIN WRW, 1983, ANN NEUROL, V14, P168
MAUNSELL JHR, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P3323
MCINTOSH AR, 1992, ADV METABOLIC MAPPIN
MCINTOSH AR, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P655
MILNER AD, 1996, VISUAL BRAIN ACTION
PAYNE B, 1997, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V20, P348
PAYNE BR, 1991, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V6, P283
PAYNE BR, 1996, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V93, P290
PAYNE BR, 1996, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V19, P535
PAYNE BR, 1996, VISUAL NEUROSCI, V13, P805
REDIES C, 1990, J NEUROSCI, V10, P2791
ROSENQUIST AC, 1985, CEREB CORTEX, V3, P81
SCANNELL JW, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P1463
SCANNELL JW, 1999, IN PRESS CEREB CORTE
SOH K, 1978, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V35, P625
SOKOLOFF L, 1977, J NEUROCHEM, V44, P295
SOKOLOFF L, 1980, NEUROSCI RES PROG B, V19, P159
SOKOLOFF L, 1981, INT REV NEUROBIOL, V22, P287
SOMMER FT, 1997, TRENDS RES, P511
TAGAMETS MA, 1997, TRENDS RES, P949
TOOTELL RBH, 1988, J NEUROSCI, V8, P1500
TOOTELL RBH, 1988, J NEUROSCI, V8, P1531
VANDUFFEL W, 1995, J COMP NEUROL, V354, P161
VANDUFFEL W, 1997, EUR J NEUROSCI, V9, P1314
VANDUFFEL W, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P7617
VANDUFFEL W, 1998, MOL PSYCHIATR, V3, P215
VILLA AEP, 1999, J NEUROSCI METH, V86, P161
WHITE EL, 1989, CORTICAL CIRCUITS SY
YAMASAKI DS, 1991, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V66, P651
YOUNG MP, 1992, NATURE, V358, P152
YOUNG MP, 1993, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V252, P13
YOUNG MP, 1994, REV NEUROSCI, V5, P227
YOUNG MP, 1995, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V348, P281
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
52
JAN
1999
86
2
195
208
ISI:000078602500008
J
Turner, M
Austin, J
Matching performance of binary correlation matrix memories
NEURAL NETWORKS
We introduce a theoretical framework for estimating the matching performance
acting as hetero-associative memories. The framework is applicable to nonsystems with binary (0, I) Hebbian weights and hard-limited threshold. It ca
matching of single or multiple data items in non-square memories. Theoretical
a probability theory framework. Inherent uncertainties in the matching pro
the use of probability distributions to describe the numbers of correct an
during retrieval. Theoretical predictions are verified experimentally for
used to aid in the design of larger systems. The results highlight the fact
can act as highly efficient memories provided a small probability of retriev
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
C ABUMOSTAFA YS, 1985, IEEE T INFORM THEORY, V31, P461
R AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
AMIT DJ, 1985, PHYS REV A, V32, P1007
ANDERSON JA, 1972, MATH BIOSCI, V14, P197
AUSTIN J, 1987, IMAGE VISION COMPUT, V5, P251
AUSTIN J, 1992, P INT C ART NEUR NET
AUSTIN J, 1994, MICRONEURO
AUSTIN J, 1994, P 4 INT C MICR NEUR, P58
AUSTIN J, 1995, INT J FUZZY SETS SYS, V82, P223
AUSTIN J, 1996, IEE C IM DAT
BUCKINGHAM J, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P441
GARDNERMEDWIN AR, 1976, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V194, P375
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
HEBB DO, 1949, ORG BEHAV
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KOHONEN T, 1973, IEEE T COMPUTERS
LITTLE WA, 1974, MATH BIOSCI, V19, P101
MARR D, 1971, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V262, P23
NAKANO K, 1972, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V2, P68
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
STEINBUCH K, 1961, KYBERNETIK, V1, P36
WILLETT P, 1991, 3 DIMENSIONAL CHEM S
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
24
R
P
DEC
D
P
1997
Y
V
10
L
I
9
S
B
1637
P
E
1648
P
U
ISI:000071201100009
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
J
Wennekers, T
Palm, G
On the relation between neural modelling and experimental neuroscience
THEORY IN BIOSCIENCES
This paper discusses the relation of theory and experiment in neuroscience exe
often made in models of coherent activation in the cortex: basic feature-cod
and global binding of whole objects. Apparently these assumptions are not
experimental evidence. We propose that it is the single synchronized populati
of feature-coding cells are temporally clustered in our opinion by recurre
each burst a single stimulus is processed (if there are several). Synchroniza
sites which physically interact. These principles are illustrated by compu
C ABELES M, 1991, CORTICONICS
R ANDERSON JA, 1988, NEUROCOMPUTING
BIBBIG A, 1995, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V66, P169
BRAITENBERG V, 1991, ANATOMY CORTEX
BULLIER J, 1993, CONCEPT NEUROSCI, V4, P159
BUSH PC, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P19
CAMPBELL S, 1994, OSUCISRC894TR43 DEP
DONG DW, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P345
ECKHORN R, 1988, BIOL CYBERN, V60, P121
ECKHORN R, 1990, NEURAL COMPUT, V2, P293
ECKHORN R, 1993, EXP BRAIN RES, V95, P177
ECKHORN R, 1993, NEUROREPORT, V4, P243
ENGEL AK, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1177
FAHLE M, 1991, BIOL CYBERN, V66, P1
GERSTNER W, 1993, BIOL CYBERN, V68, P363
GERSTNER W, 1995, PHYS REV E, V51, P738
GRAY CM, 1989, NATURE, V338, P334
GRAY CM, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P1698
GRAY CM, 1994, J COMPUT NEUROSCI, V1, P11
HORN D, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P31
KOCH C, 1992, NEURAL COMPUT, V4, P211
KONIG P, 1995, NEURAL COMPUT, V7, P469
KONIG P, 1995, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V92, P290
MACGREGOR RJ, 1987, NEURAL BRAIN MODELIN
NEVEN H, 1992, BIOL CYBERN, V67, P309
PALM G, 1982, CELL ASSEMBLIES GUID
PALM G, 1990, CONCEPTS NEUROSCI, V1, P133
RITZ R, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V71, P349
SALIN PA, 1995, PHYSIOL REV, V75, P107
SCHILLEN TB, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V70, P397
SCHWENKER F, 1996, NEURAL NETWORKS, V9, P445
SHAW GL, 1988, BRAIN THEORY
SINGER W, 1995, ANNU REV NEUROSCI, V18, P555
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1994, NEURAL COMPUT, V6, P642
TONONI G, 1992, CEREB CORTEX, V2, P310
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1986, BIOL CYBERN, V54, P29
VONDERMALSBURG C, 1992, BIOL CYBERN, V67, P233
WENNEKERS T, 1994, EUROP J NEUROSCI S, V7
WENNEKERS T, 1995, SUPERCOMPUTING BRAIN, P301
WILSON MA, 1991, NEURAL COMPUT, V3, P498
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
A
B
40
SEP
1997
116
3
267
283
ISI:A1997YA84800006
J
Hirase, H
Recce, M
A search for the optimal thresholding sequence in an associative memory
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
In learning matrix associative memory networks, the choice of threshold value
factors for determining the recall performance. Choice of threshold is especi
recall, as each network state is dependent on the prior states. Recently,
statistical approximation to formalize the dynamics of partially connected r
formalism, we evaluate all of the possible thresholding sequences and find
the highest storage capacity. The resulting optimal strategy can be closel
that is proportional to the activation of the network plus an offset. The
associative memory is shown to match well with the predictions of the theo
to one of the simplest putative roles of interneurons which provide a line
total unweighted input from the principal cells.
C AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
R BENNETT MR, 1994, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V343, P167
BUCKINGHAM J, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P441
BUCKINGHAM JT, 1991, THESIS U EDINBURGH
FROLOV A, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P513
FROLOV A, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P535
GARDNERMEDWIN AR, 1976, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V194, P375
GARDNERMEDWIN AR, 1989, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V238, P137
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
GRAHAM B, 1995, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P337
HIRASE H, 1995, P INT C ART NEUR NET, P509
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V81, P6871
LANSNER A, 1985, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V7, P490
MARR D, 1971, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V262, P23
MCNAUGHTON BL, 1987, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V10, P408
PALM G, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P177
TREVES A, 1991, NETWORK, V2, P371
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
WILLSHAW DJ, 1990, PHILOS T ROY SOC B, V329, P205
N
19
R
P
NOV
D
P
1996
Y
V
7
L
I
4
S
B
741
P
E
756
P
U
ISI:A1996VY19700008
T
E
R
P
T
A
U
T
I
S
O
J
Tanaka, T
Bit error probability of an associative memory with many-to-many correspon
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
A In associative memories (AMs) an important characteristic is the type of i
B the connection weight. Conventional AM models store a one-to-one correspond
In these models therefore, the cue pattern used to recall a pattern is rest
and noisy versions of this associated pair.
To overcome this restriction, a new model is proposed in which a many-to-ma
patterns and content patterns is stored. A content pattern can be recalled fr
which are sequentially provided to the network. The combination of key patterns
to the AM and increases its usefulness. In this paper, the bit error probabil
signal by each neuron is estimated. Computer simulations show good agreeme
C AMARI S, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P1197
R AMARI S, 1988, NEURAL NETWORKS, V1, P63
AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
AMIT DJ, 1989, MODELING BRAIN FUNCT
BUCKINGHAM J, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P441
DOMANY E, 1989, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V22, P2081
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
KOHONEN T, 1972, IEEE T COMPUT, V21, P353
KOHONEN T, 1989, SELF ORG ASS MEMORY
MEUNIER C, 1991, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V2, P469
NAKANO K, 1972, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, V2, P381
OKADA M, 1993, P INT JOINT C NEUR N, P2624
PALM G, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P177
SHIINO M, 1993, PHYS REV E, V48, P867
SOMPOLINSKY H, 1986, PHYS REV LETT, V57, P2861
N
16
R
P
AUG
D
P
1996
Y
V
7
L
I
3
S
B
573
P
E
586
P
U
ISI:A1996VT25700007
T
E
R
P
J
T
A FROLOV, A
U KARTASHOV, A
GOLTSEV, A
FOLK, R
T
QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF RETRIEVAL FOR WILLSHAW-LIKE AUTOASSOCIATIVE NETW
I
S
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
O
A The informational properties of a neural network model of an autoassociative
B synapses are investigated. The model is a modification of the Willshaw netw
which keeps approximately constant the number of active neurons (winners)
asymptotic case of large number of neurons, informational characteristics hav
for single-step correction. Comparison with simulations shows that the max
attains its asymptotic values for networks with surprisingly small number o
for multistep correction show considerable improvement over the single-ste
C AMARI S, 1989, NEURAL NETWORKS, V2, P451
R AMARI S, 1990, P IEEE, V78, P1443
AMIT DJ, 1987, ANN PHYS-NEW YORK, V173, P30
AMIT DJ, 1987, PHYS REV A, V35, P2293
AMOSOV NM, 1967, MODELING THINKING MI
BUCKINGHAM J, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P407
BUHMANN J, 1989, PHYS REV A, V39, P2689
DUNINBARKOWSKI WL, 1985, BIOL CYBERN, V51, P407
FROLOV A, 1995, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V6, P535
FROLOV AA, 1987, NEURAL MODELS ASSOCI
FROLOV AA, 1988, INFORMATIONAL CHARAC
FROLOV AA, 1989, BIOFIZIKA, V34, P868
FROLOV AA, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P495
FROLOV AA, 1996, UNPUB NETWORK COMPUT
GARDNER E, 1986, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V19, L107
GARDNERMEDWIN AR, 1976, P ROY SOC LOND B BIO, V194, P375
GIBSON WG, 1992, NEURAL NETWORKS, V5, P645
HENKEL RD, 1991, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V24, P2201
HOPFIELD JJ, 1982, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V79, P2554
HORNER H, 1989, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V75, P133
HUSEK D, 1994, NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, V4, P53
KANTER I, 1988, PHYS REV A, V37, P2739
KIRKPATRICK S, 1978, PHYS REV B, V17, P4384
MIYASHITA Y, 1988, NATURE, V331, P68
NADAL JP, 1991, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V24, P1093
PALM G, 1980, BIOL CYBERN, V36, P19
PALM G, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P177
PEREZVICENTE CJ, 1989, J PHYS A, V22, P559
ROLLS ET, 1988, NEURAL MOL BASES LEA, P503
WILLSHAW D, 1971, THESIS EDINBURGH U
WILLSHAW D, 1981, PARALLEL MODELS ASSO
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
32
NOV
1995
6
4
513
534
ISI:A1995TH70600001
P
J
T
A FROLOV, A
U KARTASHOV, A
GOLTSEV, A
FOLK, R
T
QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY OF RETRIEVAL FOR WILLSHAW-LIKE AUTOASSOCIATIVE NETW
I
S
NETWORK-COMPUTATION IN NEURAL SYSTEMS
O
A We study the recognition properties of a modification of the Willshaw asso
B threshold analytically for the asymptotic case of large networks and singl
of spurious stable states and the size of their attraction basins are calcul
simulations for single- and multistep dynamics. The appropriateness of the
on the remanent overlap is demonstrated.
C BUHMANN J, 1989, PHYS REV A, V39, P2689
R FROLOV AA, 1988, INFROMATIONAL CHARAC
FROLOV AA, 1993, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V4, P495
FROLOV AA, 1996, NETWORK COMPUTATION
FROLOV AA, 1996, NETWORK COMPUTATION, V6, P513
GARDNER E, 1986, J PHYS A, V19, L1047
HENKEL RD, 1991, J PHYS A-MATH GEN, V24, P2201
HORNER H, 1989, Z PHYS B CON MAT, V75, P133
HUSEK D, 1994, NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, V4, P53
KIRKPATRICK S, 1978, PHYS REV B, V17, P4384
PALM G, 1992, NETWORK-COMP NEURAL, V3, P177
PEREZVICENTE CJ, 1989, J PHYS A, V22, P559
WILLSHAW D, 1981, PARALLEL MODELS ASSO
WILLSHAW DJ, 1969, NATURE, V222, P960
N
R
P
D
P
Y
V
L
I
S
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
14
NOV
1995
6
4
535
549
ISI:A1995TH70600002
P
J
T
A HAU, K
U FRODL, P
GNIRSS, M
SOMMER, F
WAHL, F
T
A MICROSCOPIC THEORY OF ALPHA-PHASE HYDROGEN IN NIOBIUM
I
S
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHYSIKALISCHE CHEMIE NEUE FOLGE
O
C FEIST W, 1981, Z NATURFORSCH, V36, P429
R HAU K, UNPUB Z NATURFORSCH
HO KM, 1977, PHYS REV B, V15, P1755
MCLELLAN RB, 1975, MATER SCI ENG, V18, P5
PEISL H, 1978, HYDROGEN METALS, V1, P53
PEISL H, 1982, P YAMADA C, V5, P11
PRODL P, 1988, THESIS TUBINGEN
SCHOBER HR, 1974, PHYS STATUS SOLIDI B, V64, P173
SCHOBER T, 1978, HYDROGEN METALS, V2, P11
SOMMER FT, UNPUB Z NATURFORSCH
SPRINGER T, 1978, HYDROGEN METALS, V1, P75
WAGNER H, 1979, Z PHYS B, V36, P121
WAHL F, 1984, Z NATURFORSCH A, V39, P524
N 13
R
P
Y
V
L
P
N
B
P
E
P
U
T
E
R
1989
163
Part 2
549
554
ISI:A1989AZ51800039
EF
Related documents