Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Rev. Robert Johansen Homily for the 4th Sunday of Easter, cycle “A” When I first read today’s gospel in preparing my homily, I was struck, and even troubled by it, because it seemed to me that it was directed more at me and my brother priests than it was at you. For Christ’s words about his own identity as the Good Shepherd, and what it means to be a shepherd, have powerful ramifications on our priestly ministry. For indeed, when Bishop Murray laid his hands on me last August, I was configured to Christ as shepherd, and made a sharer in the bishops office of shepherd of souls. And when he anointed me with the sacred Chrism I was configured to Christ as High Priest and shepherd. But I was not only configured to Christ as shepherd, but to Christ as Lamb of God, offered as victim for you. So I must bear your burdens, and suffer for you, even as Christ himself did. Now, this is a grave and serious duty, and sometimes a weighty burden. And there were times, while I was in the seminary preparing for ordination, that the thought of what I was undertaking made shivers run up and down my spine. For my duty as shepherd is to speak with the voice of Christ. My duty as shepherd is to speak the truth, both in season and out of season. My duty as a shepherd of the Church is to speak for the Church, with the voice of the Church, for when the Church speaks, when the Church teaches, she does so with the voice of Christ, for she is Christ’s own body. When I die, and I appear before Christ to be judged, I will be called to account for every one of your souls. I will be judged on whether or not I spoke the truth to you. Now make no mistake, each of you will have to give an account of your own life. But because the office of shepherd has been given to me, I will have the greater accountability. I will be judged on whether I spoke with the voice of Christ. I do not want to hear Christ ask me “Rob, why didn’t you tell them? Why didn’t you speak the Truth?” So I must speak the truth, even if it is painful, or unpleasant, or unwelcome. And the truth is this: unfortunately, we have learned that some of our shepherds, some of those entrusted by Christ with the duty of tending to his flock, have gone so far as not only to neglect to feed and pasture their flock, but have themselves turned to become predators: to prey upon Christ’s flock. And perhaps even worse, some of their chief shepherds, rather than rebuking them, or removing them, have protected them. I shudder to think of the judgment that awaits those men when they have to answer before Christ. For two months now I have been thinking and debating on whether to say anything about this, and if so, what to say: and now I believe the time has come to speak. Now a great deal of blame and opprobrium has been heaped upon those men who betrayed their sacred trust, and for the most part deservedly. But a lot of blame has been cast too broadly about, but not always justly, and sometimes in a misguided way. About two months ago a woman approached me after Mass, she did so to express her displeasure with my homily. She told me that she agreed with the first part of it, but that she was disappointed with the direction I had taken. She thought that I should then have addressed the scandals, and issued some sort of apology on behalf of the priesthood and the Church. She then proceeded to tell me that, in her opinion, nothing would happen to repair these scandals until there was “real change” in the Church: by real change she meant allowing priests to marry, the ordination of women, recognition of “alternative lifestyles”, and a whole host of other things. Now, I believe I answered her politely, but I confess that I was angry, and I was angry for two reasons: first, I was angry because I thought, “holy cow, I was just ordained last August, I didn’t have anything to do with this nonsense, most of which goes back 20 or even 30 years ago. I thought, “What do I have to apologize for?” But then I remembered that when I was ordained, I was configured to Christ as Lamb of God, and Victim. And if that means that I must share some part of the burden of shame and guilt brought on by my brother priests, then so be it. It goes with the job, as they say. But I was also angry because that woman, as well intentioned as I’m sure she was, was misguided, and was placing the blame, and her hope for a solution to these scandals, in the wrong place. And there’s a lot of that going around these days. In last week’s Newsweek magazine, a column appeared by Anna Quindlen. Anna Quindlen is a famous writer, and she is Catholic. In her column she blamed the current scandals on what she calls the Church’s “repressive” teaching on sexual morality. The problem, it seems to her, is that the Church continues to teach against contraception, divorce and remarriage, the “gay” lifestyle, and all kinds of other things. This, she believes, is the cause of the scandals. And there are many people who have bought into that line of thinking. But Ms. Quindlen, and those who agree with her, however well intentioned they may be, are wrong. For when you look at what she is saying, it doesn’t even hold up logically. She contradicts herself. For what she, in essence, is saying is this: that the Church, by continuing to hold steadfast to her teaching on sexual morality, by continuing to say that certain things are wrong, is somehow responsible for those people who violate that teaching. It’s as if we were to say that because society continues to outlaw murder, and punish murderers, that society is somehow is responsible for those who commit murder. It doesn’t make sense. The truth of the matter is that the problem is not the Church’s teaching on sexual morality: remember that when the Church teaches, she does so with the voice of Christ. The problem is that too many of her members (and I’m not speaking only of priests here) have failed to live up to it. Too many of us have failed to listen to the voice of Christ, telling us how we must be holy, even as He is holy: the voice of the Shepherd, telling us that we have been saved, and redeemed from sin, for Righteousness. Too many have bought into the siren song of the world. For the world has been telling us, for the last thirty years, that we must “loosen up” about sexuality. We have to become more comfortable with our sexual appetites: we must learn to embrace our appetites. They have been telling the Church that we must get rid of our old fashioned, medieval, “repressive” ideas about sexuality, we must learn to say “OK” to our appetites. But the problem is that some people have very strange appetites. And many people within the Church have bought into this way of thinking, even some priests. And that shouldn’t surprise us: because whenever an idea or mindset as profoundly permeates a culture as sexual permissiveness has permeated ours, some members of the Church, even some of her shepherds, are likely to be taken in. And we have seen the fruit of that sexual permissiveness in our society: the breakdown of the family, skyrocketing divorce rate, HIV, illegitimacy, disease, and misery. And that rotten fruit has now even poisoned the Church. The Church’s teaching on sex is of one piece: It’s like a piece of fabric: when you try to pull one part of it away, the whole thing unravels. And we have seen an unraveling in our culture. The problem with saying OK to appetite is that once I say it is OK for me to indulge in my appetite, I no longer have any firm foundation on which to say it isn’t OK for you to indulge in yours. The problem is not the Church’s teaching, but that too many of us have failed to boldly preach and courageously live that teaching. Too many of us have failed to heed St. Peter’s warning: to save ourselves from this corrupt generation. For every generation of the world is, in its own way, corrupt, and in need of redemption. Now in a few minutes, these children will make their first Holy Communion. They will take a profound step in their relationship with God. They will be drawn closer in the embrace of Christ. And thank God for the great gift He will give them, and has given to all of us. For make no mistake, a spiritual war is going on, right now, for their souls and for ours. But we know how the story ends: Christ has risen! Christ has conquered sin: all sin, even the sins of some of her most trusted members. We have been redeemed, and our Redeemer will save us, even now, in spite of the scandal, and hurt, and injury. I remain, and am hopeful. For my hope is in Christ. It is His name, and no other name that will save us. I am hopeful, for I believe that Christ will continue to provide for His Church, and that He will give us many holy priests, whose desire is to serve you, and offer themselves for you, just as Christ, the good shepherd did: He will give us shepherds to lead us out of these difficulties. For in times of scandal and difficulty Christ has always raised up great saints who lead the Church out of those troubles. As St. Paul said, where sin abounded, grace abounded all the more. The gift of the priesthood has for me been the greatest joy I have ever known. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, I haven’t had a bad day since I was ordained. It is Christ who gave me that gift of the priesthood, and Christ our High Priest who will preserve and continue to guide His priests, and His whole Church. We must be holy, and remember that it is Christ to whom we must cling. © 2002 Rev. Robert J. Johansen This work is protected by copyright. The author reserves all rights to himself. The author gives permission for this work to be distributed freely providing that it is reproduced in its entirety, and that it’s authorship is properly attributed. This work may not be sold or republished in any newspaper, magazine, journal, or other commercial publication without the express written consent of the author. This work may not be excerpted or re-published in part without the express written consent of the author.