Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey Asia 1st Quarter, 2005 Table of Contents 1. Are you more or less optimistic about the Asian economy compared to last quarter? 1 2. Are you more or less optimistic about the financial prospects for your company compared to last quarter? 2 3. Would a revaluation of the Chinese renminbi help or hurt your firm? 3 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months for: [Public Companies - Windsorized - Unweighted - Sorted] 4 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months? [Public Companies - Windsorized – Revenue Weighted - Sorted] 5 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months? [Public Companies - Windsorized – Employee Weighted - Sorted] 6 5. What are the top four concerns your corporation faces in 2005? (rank #1, #2, #3, #4) 5. What are the top four concerns your corporation faces in 2005? OTHER SPECIFIED 6. Negative impact of terrorism. 6. Negative impact of terrorism. 7 8 9 10 7. The Federal Funds rate is currently 2.5%. What do you consider to be the "neutral" level of interest rates? (Neutral interest rates strike a balance between inflation and economic growth). 11 8a. Sarbanes-Oxley is now being phased in for non-US firms that are listed in the US. Would the cost of implementing Sarbox make you consider issuing new listings in markets other than the US? 8b. In your opinion, what are the top two benefits of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? (rank #1 and #2) 8b. In your opinion, what are the top two benefits of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? OTHER SPECIFIED 8c. What are the top two drawbacks of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? (rank #1 and #2) 8c. What are the top two drawbacks of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? OTHER SPECIFIED 12 13 14 15 16 Industry Industry (Other specified) Sales Revenue Weighted Sales Revenue (Millions) Number of Employees Weighted Number of Employees Headquarters Ownership Foreign Sales 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 1. Are you more or less optimistic about the Asian economy compared to last quarter? 3=More optimistic 2=No change 1=Less optimistic Total Mean = 2.58 SD = .69 Missing Cases = 0 Response Percent = 100.0 % Number 128 34 21 183 Percent 69.9 % 18.6 % 11.5 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.0 % ± 6.1 % ± 5.2 % 2 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 2. Are you more or less optimistic about the financial prospects for your company compared to last quarter? 3=More optimistic 2=No change 1=Less optimistic Total Mean = 2.49 SD = .74 Missing Cases = 0 Response Percent = 100.0 % Number 116 40 27 183 Percent 63.4 % 21.9 % 14.8 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.3 % ± 6.5 % ± 5.7 % 3 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 3. Would a revaluation of the Chinese renminbi help or hurt your firm? 1=Hurt a lot 2=Hurt moderately 3=Hurt a little 4=No effect 5=Help a little 6=Help moderately 7=Help a lot Total Mean = 3.96 SD = 1.28 Missing Cases = 0 Response Percent = 100.0 % Number 8 16 26 86 23 20 4 183 Percent 4.4 % 8.7 % 14.2 % 47.0 % 12.6 % 10.9 % 2.2 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 3.9 % ± 4.7 % ± 5.6 % ± 7.6 % ± 5.4 % ± 5.1 % ± 3.7 % 4 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months for: [Public Companies - Windsorized - Unweighted - Sorted] (N=75) Mean & SD Wages/Salaries 0.92 0.32 Positive 1 60 93.8% Zero 0 3 4.7% Negative -1 1 1.6% Total 64 100.0% Revenues 0.87 0.47 50 92.6% 1 1.9% 3 5.6% 54 100.0% Capital spending 0.79 0.50 40 83.3% 6 12.5% 2 4.2% 48 100.0% Earnings 0.79 0.58 41 87.2% 2 4.3% 4 8.5% 47 100.0% Productivity (output per hour worked) 0.76 0.48 33 78.6% 8 19.0% 1 2.4% 42 100.0% Technology spending 0.76 0.48 38 77.6% 10 20.4% 1 2.0% 49 100.0% Health care costs 0.74 0.50 27 77.1% 7 20.0% 1 2.9% 35 100.0% Advertising/Marketing Spending 0.62 0.60 32 68.1% 12 25.5% 3 6.4% 47 100.0% Number of domestic employees 0.58 0.70 34 70.8% 8 16.7% 6 12.5% 48 100.0% Dividends 0.47 0.67 17 56.7% 10 33.3% 3 10.0% 30 100.0% Prices of your products 0.45 0.81 32 65.3% 7 14.3% 10 20.4% 49 100.0% M&A activity 0.40 0.57 11 44.0% 13 52.0% 1 4.0% 25 100.0% Number of foreign/off-shore outsourced employees 0.34 0.63 15 42.9% 17 48.6% 3 8.6% 35 100.0% 5 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months? [Public Companies - Windsorized - Revenue Weighted - Sorted] Mean SD 95% CI Median Minimum Maximum Earnings 19.18 14.84 18.66 - 19.71 20 -50 100 Revenues 13.59 10.64 13.22 - 13.97 10 -15 91.16 Capital spending 11.02 11.46 10.56 - 11.48 10 -35.80 69.58 Technology spending 9.78 14.95 9.23 - 10.32 5 -5 68.37 Dividends 4.43 20.15 3.45 - 5.41 5 -27.20 38.97 Advertising/Marketing Spending 3.43 5.37 3.22 - 3.64 0 -10 40.78 Prices of your products 2.79 6.40 2.56 - 3.03 4 -12.30 19.40 -0.26 10.44 -0.82 - 0.31 0 -30 52.22 M&A activity 6 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 4. Relative to the previous 12 months, what will be your company's PERCENTAGE CHANGE during the next 12 months? [Public Companies - Windsorized - Employee Weighted - Sorted] Mean SD 95% CI Median Minimum Maximum Wages/Salaries 6.63 8.70 6.35 - 6.91 4 -19.70 35.14 Health care costs 4.17 4.11 4.00 - 4.34 3 -17.10 25 Number of foreign/off-shore outsourced employees 3.88 5.04 3.68 - 4.09 3 -1 35.71 Number of domestic employees 3.58 8.42 3.25 - 3.91 2 -50 79.82 Productivity (output per hour worked) 2.90 3.77 2.76 - 3.04 2 -5 25 7 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 5. What are the top four concerns your corporation faces in 2005? (rank #1, #2, #3, #4) (N=183) High fuel prices Mean & SD 1.92 0.97 1st 28 42.4% 2nd 21 31.8% 3rd 11 16.7% 4th 6 9.1% Total 66 100.0% High non-fuel commodity prices 2.09 0.98 11 32.4% 13 38.2% 6 17.6% 4 11.8% 34 100.0% Availability/cost of capital 2.15 1.10 21 40.4% 9 17.3% 15 28.8% 7 13.5% 52 100.0% Competition 2.31 1.09 37 30.6% 31 25.6% 31 25.6% 22 18.2% 121 100.0% World economic stability 2.35 1.19 28 35.9% 13 16.7% 19 24.4% 18 23.1% 78 100.0% Other 2.38 1.33 5 38.5% 3 23.1% 0 0.0% 5 38.5% 13 100.0% Reduced pricing power 2.41 1.03 14 21.2% 24 36.4% 15 22.7% 13 19.7% 66 100.0% U.S. dollar weakness 2.48 1.08 10 20.8% 17 35.4% 9 18.8% 12 25.0% 48 100.0% Increased interest rates 2.59 1.01 8 17.4% 13 28.3% 15 32.6% 10 21.7% 46 100.0% Political risk 2.63 1.12 11 19.3% 17 29.8% 11 19.3% 18 31.6% 57 100.0% Distribution problems 2.67 0.91 2 5.6% 17 47.2% 8 22.2% 9 25.0% 36 100.0% Increased regulation 2.69 1.07 8 17.8% 11 24.4% 13 28.9% 13 28.9% 45 100.0% Salaries and wages 2.71 1.09 13 20.0% 12 18.5% 21 32.3% 19 29.2% 65 100.0% Inflation 2.76 1.05 7 14.0% 14 28.0% 13 26.0% 16 32.0% 50 100.0% U.S. budget deficit 2.88 1.05 1 12.5% 2 25.0% 2 25.0% 3 37.5% 8 100.0% U.S. trade deficit 3.11 0.87 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 2 22.2% 4 44.4% 9 100.0% Health care costs 3.36 0.77 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 3 27.3% 6 54.5% 11 100.0% 8 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 5. What are the top four concerns your corporation faces in 2005? OTHER SPECIFIED additional competent human resources Availability of Raw Material cOMPETITION Decreasing demand for product lost business MNC Competition from Foreign Piracy Production Issues Productivity Regional economic growth Statutory levies Technology capability Technology changes40 unstable social factor eg Terrorist Weak Purchasing Power 9 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 6. Negative impact of terrorism. Mean SD 95% CI Median Minimum Maximum Total On a scale of 0 to 100, how do you rank the negative impact that the threat of terrorism is having on your business? (0 means no impact, 100 means maximum negative impact from threat of terrorism.) 28.92 28.08 24.86 - 32.99 20 0 100 183 What number on this scale would indicate that the threat of terrorism is affecting your bottom line? (If your answer in 6a is greater than this number, it means that the threat of terrorism is affecting your bottom line.) 26.07 27.51 22.03 - 30.11 15 0 100 178 0 -70 75 178 Negative impact minus cut-off negative impact. 3.16 16.10 0.79 - 5.53 10 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 6. Negative impact of terrorism. Cut-off negative impact Threat of terrorism is significantly affecting your bottom line. Negative impact and cut-off negative impact are equal Threat of terrorism is not significantly affecting your bottom line. Total Missing Cases = 5 Response Percent = 97.3 % Number Percent 90% CI 64 89 36.0 % 50.0 % ± 6.2 % ± 6.4 % 25 178 14.0 % 100.0 % ± 4.6 % 11 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 7. The Federal Funds rate is currently 2.5%. What do you consider to be the "neutral" level of interest rates? (Neutral interest rates strike a balance between inflation and economic growth). Less than 1.0% 1.0% 1.25% 1.5% 1.75% 2.0% 2.25% 2.5% 2.75% 3.0% 3.25% 3.5% 3.75% 4.0% Greater than 4.0% Total Mean = 2.59 SD = .83 Missing Cases = 10 Response Percent = 94.5 % Number 3 6 4 10 7 27 10 20 8 42 6 13 3 11 3 173 Percent 1.7 % 3.5 % 2.3 % 5.8 % 4.0 % 15.6 % 5.8 % 11.6 % 4.6 % 24.3 % 3.5 % 7.5 % 1.7 % 6.4 % 1.7 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 4.3 % ± 3.7 % ± 3.7 % ± 4.1 % ± 3.8 % ± 5.7 % ± 4.1 % ± 5.1 % ± 3.9 % ± 6.6 % ± 3.7 % ± 4.4 % ± 4.3 % ± 4.2 % ± 4.3 % 12 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 8a. Sarbanes-Oxley is now being phased in for non-US firms that are listed in the US. Would the cost of implementing Sarbox make you consider issuing new listings in markets other than the US? 1=Yes 2=Maybe 3=No Total Mean = 2.09 SD = .78 Missing Cases = 13 Response Percent = 92.9 % Number 45 64 61 170 Percent 26.5 % 37.6 % 35.9 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 6.7 % ± 7.3 % ± 7.3 % 13 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 8b. In your opinion, what are the top two benefits of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? (rank #1 and #2) (N=183) Better corporate governance Mean & SD 1.24 0.43 1st 106 76.3% 2nd 33 23.7% Total 139 100.0% Lower cost of capital 1.35 0.48 11 64.7% 6 35.3% 17 100.0% Improved company reputation 1.69 0.46 28 31.5% 61 68.5% 89 100.0% Set an example for other companies in Asia to follow 1.70 0.46 6 30.0% 14 70.0% 20 100.0% Other 1.71 0.45 2 28.6% 5 71.4% 7 100.0% Improved ability to attract investors 1.72 0.45 20 27.8% 52 72.2% 72 100.0% 14 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 8b. In your opinion, what are the top two benefits of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? OTHER SPECIFIED better control Deterrent to internal malpractices Improve documentation of processes no benifits none Reassess operational efficiencies reduced non-value adding processes 15 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 8c. What are the top two drawbacks of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? (rank #1 and #2) (N=183) Cost Mean & SD 1.15 0.36 1st 103 85.1% 2nd 18 14.9% Total 121 100.0% Accountability of senior executives 1.55 0.50 14 45.2% 17 54.8% 31 100.0% Changes to my company’s accounting processes 1.66 0.47 12 34.3% 23 65.7% 35 100.0% Less flexible accounting 1.71 0.45 10 28.6% 25 71.4% 35 100.0% Increased complexity 1.72 0.45 33 28.4% 83 71.6% 116 100.0% Other 1.83 0.37 1 16.7% 5 83.3% 6 100.0% 16 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 8c. What are the top two drawbacks of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley? OTHER SPECIFIED a ton of paperworks and documentation Burden on limited human resources Increased bureacracy less efficiency in cases slow down of decision process time taken out of present staff 17 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Industry Manufacturing Other Retail/Wholesale Service/Consulting Banking/Finance/Insurance Transportation/Energy Healthcare/Pharmaceutical Communications/Media Mining/Construction Tech [Software/Biotech] Total Missing Cases = 7 Response Percent = 96.2 % Number 58 23 22 20 14 10 9 8 6 6 176 Percent 33.0 % 13.1 % 12.5 % 11.4 % 8.0 % 5.7 % 5.1 % 4.5 % 3.4 % 3.4 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.2 % ± 5.4 % ± 5.3 % ± 5.1 % ± 4.5 % ± 4.1 % ± 4.0 % ± 3.9 % ± 3.7 % ± 3.7 % 18 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Industry (Other specified) BPO Consumer Goods (beverages) Education Electric/Electronic Engineering Services hospitality hotel hotel IT MICE mixed power generation PROPERTY public Restaurants/Franchisor securuties System Integrator Telecom Telecommunication Trading & Distribution trading 19 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Sales Revenue Less than $25 million $25-$99 million $100-$499 million $500-$999 million $1-$4.9 billion $5-$9.9 billion More than $10 billion Total Missing Cases = 1 Response Percent = 99.5 % Number 54 47 36 12 17 5 11 182 Percent 29.7 % 25.8 % 19.8 % 6.6 % 9.3 % 2.7 % 6.0 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.1 % ± 6.8 % ± 6.3 % ± 4.3 % ± 4.8 % ± 3.6 % ± 4.2 % 20 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Weighted Sales Revenue (Millions) Minimum = 25 Maximum = 7500 Mean = 658.27 Median = 62 Variance (Unbiased) = 2178570.74 Standard Deviation (Unbiased) = 1476.00 Standard Error Of The Mean = 112.87 95 Percent Confidence Interval Around The Mean = 437.04 - 879.50 99 Percent Confidence Interval Around The Mean = 367.62 - 948.92 Skewness = 3.29 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Statistic For Normality = 5.22 Quartiles 1 = 25 2 = 62 3 = 300 Valid Cases = 171 Missing Cases = 12 Response Percent = 93.4% 21 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Number of Employees Fewer than 100 100-499 500-999 1,000-2,499 2,500-4,999 5,000-9,999 Over 10,000 Total Missing Cases = 20 Response Percent = 89.1 % Number 37 52 17 15 17 9 16 163 Percent 22.7 % 31.9 % 10.4 % 9.2 % 10.4 % 5.5 % 9.8 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 6.3 % ± 7.0 % ± 4.8 % ± 4.6 % ± 4.8 % ± 4.0 % ± 4.7 % 22 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Weighted Number of Employees Minimum = 100 Maximum = 12000 Mean = 2340.80 Median = 300 Variance (Unbiased) = 13683525.90 Standard Deviation (Unbiased) = 3699.13 Standard Error Of The Mean = 289.74 95 Percent Confidence Interval Around The Mean = 1772.91 - 2908.68 99 Percent Confidence Interval Around The Mean = 1594.72 - 3086.87 Skewness = 1.81 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Statistic For Normality = 4.07 Quartiles 1 = 300 2 = 300 3 = 3750 Valid Cases = 163 Missing Cases = 20 Response Percent = 89.1% 23 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Headquarters Asia North America Europe Central/South America Total Missing Cases = 2 Response Percent = 98.9 % Number 124 34 20 3 181 Percent 68.5 % 18.8 % 11.0 % 1.7 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.1 % ± 6.1 % ± 5.1 % ± 4.3 % 24 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Ownership Private Public Government Nonprofit Total Missing Cases = 13 Response Percent = 92.9 % Number 95 69 4 2 170 Percent 55.9 % 40.6 % 2.4 % 1.2 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 7.6 % ± 7.4 % ± 3.7 % 25 Duke University/CFO Magazine Business Outlook Survey - Asia - 1st Quarter, 2005 Foreign Sales 0% 1-24% 25-50% Over 50% Total Missing Cases = 3 Response Percent = 98.4 % Number 45 47 25 63 180 Percent 25.0 % 26.1 % 13.9 % 35.0 % 100.0 % 95% CI ± 6.7 % ± 6.8 % ± 5.5 % ± 7.3 %