Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Lithosphere in craton margins and adjacent orogens: seismic structure and tectonic implications Huaiyu Yuan CCFS-Macquarie University, University of WA, Geological Survey WA Australia IGG-CAS Jan. 17 2014 Building craton lithosphere Lee et al., Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci, 2011 Destroying craton lithosphere Lee et al., Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci, 2011 High resolution image along craton margins/orogens High resolution image along craton margins/orogens o Temporary line/2D array setup; 1-2 year deployments o Array processing methods: body wave tomography; receiver functions; ambient noise o Few 100s km lateral structure with 10s km lateral resolution: better than TA resolution Observations regarding craton stabilization and reworking High resolution image along craton margins/orogens o Temporary line/2D array setup; 1-2 year deployments o Array processing methods: body wave tomography; receiver functions; ambient noise o Few 100s km lateral structure with 10s km lateral resolution: better than TA resolution Observations regarding craton stabilization and reworking o Examples in Wyoming craton and surrounding orogens/margins o Building a craton: subduction polarity reversal; Wedge tectonics o Destroying mechanism: plume erosion; mid-crustal sill; lower crustal flow; magmatic underplating (7.x layer). Wyoming craton Yuan et al. 2011; Modified from Whitmeyer and Karlstrom 2007 Wyoming craton Yuan et al. 2011; Modified from Whitmeyer and Karlstrom 2007 o Proterozoic orogens along 3 sides o Cheyenne belt extensively studied o West margin unclear; affected by Yellowstone hotspot system Foster et al., 2006 Wyoming craton Yuan et al. 2011; Modified from Whitmeyer and Karlstrom 2007 o Upper mantle dipping reflectors from active imaging along north border: imbricated slab Gorman et al., 2002 Foster et al., 2006 Geophysical lines/arrays Yuan and Dueker 2010; Modified from Mueller and Frost 2006 Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab Archean/Proterozoic (1.78-1.76 Ga; Karlstrom 1988) southward subduction; o lack of subduction related rocks on the Archean side; o dip of mylonite zones along the shear zone on the surface Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab CD-ROM lines image the structure using Pand S-wave body wave tomography (Yuan and Dueker 2005) Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab North dipping high velocity found beneath the Cheyenne belt P-wave S-wave Model Error Spike test Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab North dipping high velocity found beneath the Cheyenne belt P-wave S-wave Model Error Spike test Proposed as a fossil slab segment, the Cheyenne slab Consistent with north-dipping anisotropy modelled by shear wave splitting Requires anisotropy present in the “slab” Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab Subduction polarity reversal is proposed Southern margin: The Cheyenne slab High velocity Cheyenne slab observed along the whole southern margin Receiver function CCP structure follows the slab interface Yuan and Dueker, 2010 Southern margin: Imbricated Moho Receiver function CCP image across the Cheyenne belt Laramie array: 30 sites with 2-km spacing; 1 year operation No Moho in active reflection images Southern margin: Imbricated Moho Imbricated Moho: Archean + Proterozoic Moho Consistent with northward subduction P-wave CCP Stacking Proterozoic Moho Archean Moho Southern margin: Imbricated Moho Imbricated Moho: Archean + Proterozoic Moho Consistent with northward subduction S-wave CCP Stacking P-wave CCP Stacking Archean Moho Proterozoic Moho Hansen and Dueker 2009 Southern margin: The Wedge tectonics The Wedge tectonics: stronger Archean lithosphere vs weaker (more deformable) juvenile terrane lithosphere Archean Moho Proterozoic Moho Snyder 2002 Southern margin: The Wedge tectonics The Wedge tectonics along the Cheyenne belt Note red is positive gradient in 2 and 3! Yuan and Dueker, 2010 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Plume interacting with the Archean lithosphere Ambien noise image of the crust and shallow upper mantle USGS website Western margin: Yellowstone plume Plume interacting with the Archean lithosphere Ambien noise image of the crust and shallow upper mantle Stachnik et al. 2008 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Thinning of lithosphere under the hotspot track Stachnik et al. 2008 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Consistent with body-wave Yellowstone plume image Stachnik et al. 2008; Yuan et al. 2005 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Magma injection into the crust: mid-crustal sill and lower crustal flow Mid-crustal sill (MCS) Stachnik et al. 2008 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Magma injection into the crust: mid-crustal sill and lower crustal flow Peng and Humphreys, 1998 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Magma injection into the crust: mid-crustal sill and lower crustal flow Stachnik et al. 2008 Western margin: Yellowstone plume Earlier magma injection in the Archean crust: 7.x layer 7.x P-wave velocity from active source modeling Stachnik et al. 2008 7.x layer Western margin: Yellowstone plume 7.x layer in receiver functions, active source imaging and gravity modeling Yuan et al. 2010 Snelson et al. 1998 Summary Paleo-subduction and imbrication played an important role in craton stabilization by docking Proterozoic terranes to the Archean craton Inconsistent observations with surface geology suggest subduction polarity reversal Yellowstone plume strongly modified Archean craton by eroding (thinning) the lithosphere; Also increased crust volume by injecting magma into the crust Magma injection & forming of Mid-crustal sill Mid-crustal sill induces lower crustal flow