Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The Taming of the Shrew Act 3 Socratic Seminar Assignment Here’s your chance to put your literary analysis, listening, and speaking skills to the test! Your class will be discussing Act 3 of The Taming of the Shrew to answer essential questions from the unit. What are an individual’s social responsibilities? How does a person’s social role(s) affect relationships? How does a person express individualism within a society? How do individuals manipulate others to achieve their ends? What is it? A Socratic Seminar is a student-led discussion that is based on essential questions. Socrates, an Athenian philosopher born in 469 BC, is credited with formulating this method of discussion. Encouraging participants to sit in a circle, Socrates would draw knowledge from the group by presenting a series of deeply philosophical questions. A seminar consists of four elements: The text(s) – Act 3 of “The Taming of the Shrew”; if you’ve watched related movies, plays, etc, then you may consider them as well The question(s) – What are an individual’s social responsibilities? How does a person’s social role(s) affect relationships? How does a person express individualism within a society? How do individuals manipulate others to achieve their ends? The leader - Offers the initial question then plays a dual role as leader and participant. (The Teacher) The participants - Study the text in advance, listen actively, and share ideas using evidence from the texts and personal experience for support. In addition, students will be recording information as other students make comments and ask questions. LISTEN TO YOUR PEERS. Consider their thoughts and how they may affect your opinion. Your task: Answer the essential questions above by focusing specifically on the text and your own experiences. In order to prepare for the upcoming Socratic Seminar, you will need to gather significant quotations and examples from the text and your personal experiences. You will be graded you on your level of preparedness. Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 95 Spring 2008 Draft Step #1: Determining Your Perspective and Finding Evidence from the texts and Personal Experience/Historical Events: Begin by considering your own personal answers to the questions. Next, find specific examples from Act 3 that help to support your position and answer the above “essential” questions. For the seminar, you must have a total of six quotations/examples: Four quotes from The Taming of the Shrew Two examples from personal experience or historical events Ideas/topics to consider as you prepare for the seminar: Bianca’s relationship with Hortensio Bianca’s relationship with Lucentio Katherine’s relationship with her father Katherine’s relationship with Petruchio Petruchio’s relationship with Grumio Petruchio’s relationship with Hortensio A woman’s “social responsibility” during this time A man’s “social responsibility” during this time Who is manipulating who in this Act, especially in scene 2? How are they manipulating others? What does it mean to express “individualism” within a society? What might happen if someone cannot express their “individualism”? How can the characters in the play express their “individualism”? Real life experiences How does it feel to be manipulated by others? What are your responsibilities to your “society”? How do social roles affect relationships in your life? For example, how is a relationship with a coach different from a relationship with a friend? Consider your relationships with teachers, parents, your lacrosse team, your girl scout troop, etc. How do social roles affect these relationships? How do you express your “individualism”? When do you manipulate others? How do you do it and why? Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 96 Spring 2008 Draft Now that you have considered the questions, locate quotes and examples that help to support your opinions about the questions. Examples from Act 3: Quotation: Quotation: Explanation: Explanation: Quotation: Quotation: Explanation: Explanation: Examples from Personal Experience/Historical Events Example: Quotation: Explanation: Explanation: Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 97 Spring 2008 Draft Step #2 -- Discussion Questions: Write down 6 discussion questions reflecting each of the three levels of Costa’s Levels of Questions that you might introduce to the group. You should write questions pertaining to The Taming of the Shrew. Remember, good discussion questions are “open ended” and produce more than just “yes/no” answers, or answers that are easily found in the book. Ask deep, “so what” questions to enrich your discussion! Level One Question: Level One Question: Level Two Question: Level Two Question: Level Three Question: Level Three Question: Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 98 Spring 2008 Draft Step #3 – Socratic Seminar: Now that you have organized your thoughts, it is your job to present those thoughts to your classmates. At the same time, you will be taking notes about the perspectives of others. If someone makes a valid point or a compelling argument, write it down so that you may re-evaluate your thinking later. Seminar Day 1 Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 Seminar Day 2 99 Spring 2008 Draft What am I supposed to do when I’m in a Socratic Seminar? o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Refer to the text when needed during the discussion. A seminar is not a test of memory. You are not "learning a subject"; your goal is to understand the ideas, issues, and values reflected in the text. You may want to post it note examples that you plan to use. Ask questions about the reading or issues related to the reading. Ask for clarification of something you don’t understand. Make judgments that can be defended with the text. Locate facts and examples that can be cited as evidence for an argument. Connect the reading to the real world. Stick to the point currently under discussion; make notes about ideas you want to come back to. Move the seminar forward—avoid repetitions. Don't raise hands; take turns speaking. Listen attentively and patiently. Exhibit mature behavior with patience and self-control. Speak up so that all can hear you. Talk to each other, not just to the leader or teacher. Be aware of time in terms of how long you speak and in terms of the needs of others to speak. Use specific examples when you speak. Avoid speaking for the group; use “I statements” when possible. Avoid interrupting someone when he or she is speaking and avoid side conversations. How will you be graded? Come to the seminar prepared with quotes, examples, and questions.(40 points) Participate in a meaningful way during the seminar. To participate in a meaningful way means to make a comment, make a connection to the text, ask a question that builds on what other participants are saying, take notes during discussion and/or summarize key points. (40 points) Complete the exit ticket by relating the discussion to the assigned question. (20 points) Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 100 Spring 2008 Draft Exit Ticket: To what extent does our society shape us as people? Use examples from Act 3 of “The Taming of the Shrew” to examine this question and explain how society has shaped or is shaping the characters in the play. Use examples from the discussion and from the text. Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 101 Spring 2008 Draft Costa's Levels of Inquiry Inquiry-based learning focuses on the student as learner, developing skillful, open-ended questioning skills. Level One Questions (Text Explicit) Level 1 statement Readers can point to one correct answer right in the text. Words found in these questions include: defining observing describing naming identifying reciting noting listing Level Two Questions (Text Implicit) Level 2 Statement Readers infer answers from what the text implicitly states, finding answers in several places in the text. Words found in these questions include: analyzing grouping synthesizing comparing/contrasting inferring sequencing Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 Define irony. (English) Identify the starting date of the American Revolution. (History) Define tangent. (Math) Define photosynthesis. (Science) 102 Compare and contrast Mr. Frank and Mr. Van Daan in Anne Frank: Diary of a Young Girl. (English) Analyze the causes of the American Revolution. (History) Compare the square root of 49 to the square root of 64. Which is greater? (Math) Diagram and order the stages of photosynthesis. (Science) Spring 2008 Draft Level Three Questions (Experience Based) Level 3 Statement Readers think beyond what the text states. Answers are based on reader’s prior knowledge/experience and will vary. Words found in these questions include: evaluating judging applying a principle speculating imagining predicting hypothesizing Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 103 Predict how Charlie Gordon will change after his operation in Flowers for Algernon. (English) Imagine you were a soldier fighting in the Civil War. How would you feel? (History) Apply the Pythagorean theorem to the find the measurement of this triangle. (Math) Diagram the stages of photosynthesis and predict how long each takes. (Science) Spring 2008 Draft “The Taming of the Shrew” Socratic Seminar Rubric A – The participant is active but respectful in the discussion. The participant cites the text specifically as support in the discussion. The participant may ask new questions of the group or offer insightful and original ideas for discussion. The participant shares either personal experience, refers to other texts, or refers to historical events to enrich the discussion. The participant demonstrates higher-level questioning and/or thinking skills. The participant demonstrates an excellent understanding of the text. B – The participant is somewhat active and respectful in the discussion. The participant refers to the text but might not cite the text in the discussion. The participant asks new questions/and or contributes answers to discussion questions. The participant stays mostly on task throughout the discussion. The participant demonstrates a good understanding of the text. C – The participant is somewhat attentive and involved in the discussion. The participant rarely refers to the text. The participant either asks a new question or contributes an answer. The participant seems somewhat off-task. The participant demonstrates a limited understanding of the text. D – The participant is inattentive during the discussion and/or disrespectful. The participant does not offer a question or answer during the discussion. The participant demonstrates very little understanding of the text. The participant is chewing gum during the discussion. Unit 1: Elemental Conflict Gifted and Talented English: Grade 7 104 Spring 2008 Draft