Download Interpersonal relations: A tehory of interdependence. New York

From University #1
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Jones, E.E. (1998). Major developments in 5 decades of social psychology. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.)
The handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 1, 3-57).
Taylor, S.E. (1998). The social being in social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The
handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 1., pp. 58-95).
EARLY THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
I.
Attribution Theory
Jones, E.E. (1991). Interpersonal Perception. New York: W.H. Freeman (Ch.1, Ch. 2, and Ch. 3).
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
(Ch. 4).
Jones, E.E. & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L.
Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.
Pruitt, D.J., & Insko, C.A. (1980). Extension of the Kelley attribution model: The role of comparison object
consensus, target object consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
39, 39-58.
Kelley, H.H. (1986). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on
Motivation, 15, 192-238.
Trope, Y. Identification and inference process in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
Major, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie & D.
L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345-370). San
Diego, CA: Academic Press.
II.
Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford Press (Chapter 1).
Insko, C.A. & Schopler, J. (1972). Experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press. Cahps. 4 & 5.
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R.H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology, 17, 229-266.
Fazio, R.H., Zanna, M.P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each
theory’s proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Socail Psychology, 13, 464 – 479.
Steele, C.M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 261-301.
1
Tedeschi, J.T. & Rosenfeld, P. (1981). Impression management theory and the forced compliance paradigm. In J.T.
Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Mangement Theory and Social Psychological Research, New York: Academic Press.
Tesser, A. (2000). On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 4, 290 – 299.
III.
Social Comparison Theory
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Goethals, G.R., & Darley, J.M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J.M. Suls & R. L.
Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259-278). Washington, DC:
Hemisphere.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances
in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 181-227). New York: Academic Press
Wood, J.V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological
Bulletin, 106, 231-248.
Blanton, H. (2001). Evaluating the self in the context of another: The three-selves model of social comparison
assimilation and contrast. In G.B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the
Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. (pp. 75 - 87) Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gilbert, D.T., Giesler, R.B., & Morris, D.A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 69, 227-236.
Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability
judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221-232.
TTTITUDE THEORY AND FUNCTION
I.
BACKGROUND
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, E. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.),
The handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 1., Chapters 1, 2 ).
Breckler, S.J., & Wiggins, E.C. (1989). On defining attitude and attitude theory: Once more with feeling. In A.R.
Pratkanis, S.J. Breckler & A.G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 407 – 428). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Wilson, T. D., & Hodges, S. D. (1992). Attitudes as temporary constructions. In A. Tesser & L. Martin (Eds.), The
construction of social judgment (pp. 37-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, C. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101 – 126.
II.
Attitude-Behavior Relations
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley. Ch 1-8, pp. 1-382
2
Fazio, R.H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins, (Eds.), Handbook of
Motivation and Cognition, (Vol. 1, pp. 204-244).
Ajzen, I (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann (Eds.) Action
control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107 – 122.
Jaccard, J., & Blanton, H. (in press). The origins and structure of behavior: Conceptualizing behavioral criteria in
attitude research. Chapter to appear in D. Albaraccin, B. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes and
attitude change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
III.
Persuasion and Attitude Change
Miller, N., & Colman, D.E. (1981). Methodological issues in analyzing the cognitive mediation of persuasion. In
Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M., & Brock, T.C. (Eds.) Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 105 – 125). New York:
Erlbaum Associates.
Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.)
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123 – 205). New York: Academic Press.
Johnson, B.T. & Eagly, A.H. (1990)> Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence.
Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367 – 374.
Kruglanski, A.W. & Thompson, E.P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel.
Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83 – 109.
Insko, C.A. (1999). A balance-logic perspective on Kruglanski and Thompson’s single-route approach to persuasion.
Psychological Inquiry, 10, 127 – 137.
Green, M.C., & Brock, T.C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.
IV.
Balance
Insko, C.A. (1981). Balance theory and phenomenology. In Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M., & Brock, T.C., Cognitive
responses in persuasion (p. 309 – 338). New York: Erlbaum Associates.
Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 9, 366 – 378.
King, L.A., & Pennebaker, J.W. (1998)> What’s so great about feeling good? Psychological Inquiry, 9, 53 – 56.
Insko, C.A. (1984). Balance theory, the Jordan paradigm, and the Wiest Tetrahedron. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.)
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 89 – 140). New York: Academic Press.
3
SOCIAL-PERSONALITY
I.
Personality Process
Snyder, M., & Ickes,W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. The handbook of social psychology (3rd Edition,
Volume II, 883-948).
Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “Having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition.
American Psychologist, 45, 735-750.
Mischel, W. & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations,
dispositions, dynamics, and invariances in personality structure.
Sanna, Stocker, S.L., & Clarke, J.A. (2003)> Rumination, imagination, and personality: Specters of the past and
future in the present. In E.C. Change & L.J. Sanna (eds.), Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior
(pp. 105 – 124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
II.
Development
Dweck, C.S., & Legget, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological
Review, 95, 256-273.
Bem, D.J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological-Review,
103(2), 320-335
Higgins, E.T. (1991). Development of self-regulatory and self-evaluative processes: Costs, benefits, and tradeoffs.
In M.R. Gunnar et al. (Eds.), Self processes and development (pp. 125-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rholes, W.S., Newman, L.S., & Ruble, D.N. (1990). Understanding self and other: Developmental and motivational
aspects of perceiving persons in terms of invariant dispositions. In E.T. Higgins et al. (Ed.), Handbook of motivation
and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 369-407). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
THE SELF
I.
Background
James, W. (1989/1968). The self. In C. Gordon & K. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction (pp. 41-49). New
York: Wiley.
Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
Markus, H. & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health.
Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
Swann, W.B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53,
1038-1051.
II.
Self-perception and Introspection
4
Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.
6). New York: Academic Press.
Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and
self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(2), 133-147.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
Wicklund, R. A. (1975). Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social
psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press. 233-275
Turner, R. H. (1976). The real self: From institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 989-1016.
Vallacher & Wegner (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on
skillful performance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H. & Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in
estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,
211-222
Wegner, D. M., Ansfield, M., & Pilloff, D. (1998). The putt and the pendulum: Ironic effects of the mental control of
action. Psychological Science, 9, 196-199.
II.
Self-Presentation
Baumeister,R. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin,91,,3-26.
Tedeschi, J.T. (1989). Self-presentation and social influence: An interactionist perspective. In Cody, M.J., &
Mclaughflin, M.L. (Eds.), Psychology of tactical communication. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.
Schlenker, B.R. (1986). Self-identification: toward an integration of the private and public self. Baumeister, R.F. (ed).
Public and private self (pp. 21-62). N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.
Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1985). Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social
psychology: A useful dichotomy? Psychological Review, 92, 59-87.
III.
Self-Regulation
Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (1988). A model of behavioral self-regulation: Translating intention into action.
Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 303-346.
Higgins, E.T. (1999). Promotion and prevention as motivational duality: Implications for evaluative process. In S.
Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds), Dual-process theories in social psychology, (pp. 503 - 528). New York: Guilford Press.
Blanton, H., & Christie, C. (2003). Deviance regulation: A theory of identity and action. Review of General
Psychology, 7(2), 115 - 149.
5
Lepper, M.R., & Greene, D. (1978). Overjustification research and beyond: Toward a means-end analysis of
intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. Lepper & D. Greene (Eds.), The hidden costs of rewards. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Rigby, C.S., Deci, E.L., Patrick, B.C. & Ryan, R.M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic/extrinsic dichotomy: Selfdetermination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165-185.
Taylor, S.E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis.
Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
Muraven, M. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control
resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
SOCIAL COGNITION
I.
Background
Wegner, D.M., & Gilbert, D.T. (2000). Social psychology – The science of human experience. IN H. Bless & J.P.
Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 1 – 9).
Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Hamilton, D.L., Devine, P.G., & Ostrom, T.M. (1994). Socail cognition and classic issues in social psychology. In
P.G. Devine, D.L. Hamilton, & T.M. Ostrom (eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology, (pp. 1 – 13).
Schwarz, N. (1998). Warmer and more social: Recent developments in cognitive socail psychology. Annual Review
of Sociology, 24, 239 – 264.
II.
Judgment and Decision Making
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263 –
291
Shafir, E. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory and
Cognition, 21, 546 – 556.
Nisbett, R.E., & Ross, L. (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Chapters 1 – 5)
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-489.
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992A). Constructing reality and its alternatives: An inclusion/exclusion model of
assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment. In L.L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.). The construction of social
judgments (pp. 217-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle et
al. (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101 – 118). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Roese, N.J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133 – 148.
6
Sanna, L.J., Turley-Ames, K.J., & Meier, S. (1999). Mood, self-esteem and simulated alternatives: Thoughtprovoking affective influences on counterfactual direction. Journal of Personalitya nd Social Psychology, 76, 543 –
558.
Sanna, L.J., Schwarz, N., & Stocker, S.L. (2002)> When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility
experiences in debiasing hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 497
– 502.
Gilbert, D. T. & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In J.
P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press
pp. 178-197
III.
Emotion and Cognition
Schachter, S. (1978). The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional states. In L.
Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 49-80). New York: Academic Press.
Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 10191024.
Ekman, P. and Davidson, R.J. (1994). The nature of emotions. New York: Oxford University Press. Questions 1, 2,
and 9.
Martin, L.L., Ward, D.W., Achee, J.W., & Wyer, R.S. (1993)> Mood as input: People have to interpret the
motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317 – 326.
Sanna, L. J., Turley, K. J., & Mark, M. M. (1996). Expected evaluation, goals, and performance: Mood as input.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 323-335.
IV.
Automaticity
Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition.
In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh, Unintended Thought (pp. 3-51). New York: The Guilford Press.
Devine , P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
Gilbert, D.T. How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on
the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817.
Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S.
Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 361-382.
Monteith, M.J., Sherman, J.W., & Devine, P.G. (1998). Supression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 2, 63 – 82.
Payne, B. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a
weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
7
Payne, B. K., Lambert, A. J., & Jacoby, L. L. (2002). Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and
cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384-396.
V.
Stereotypes & Expectancy Confirmation
Darley, J.M., & Fazio, R.H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.
American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5) 797-811.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E.D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the selffulfilling nature of social stereotypes. JPSP, 35(9), 656-666.
Bartholow et al. (2001). A physiological examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social
expectancy violations. Psychological Science, 12, 197 – 204.
INTERPERSONAL PROCESS
I.
Background
Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J.W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A tehory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
(Chapters 1 through 5).
Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18,
142-182.
II.
Close Relationships
Rusbult, C.E., & Arriaga, X.B. (2000). Interdependence in personal relationships. In W. Ickes & S. Duck (Eds.),
The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 79 – 108). Chichester: Wiley.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey
(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 193-281). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hazaen, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 52, 511 – 524.
Griffin, D.W., & Bartholowmew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying
measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 430-445
Sabini, J., & Green, M.C. (2004). Emotional responses to sexual and emotional infidelity: Constants and differences
across genders, samples, and methods. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1375-1388.
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal
narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707-722.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. (2005). Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard
constrains attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
8
III.
Group Process
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-Categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.),
Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 223- 275). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Tajfel, H. & Forgas, J. P. (1981). Social categorization: Cognitions, values and groups. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Social
Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. New York: Academic Press.
Brewer, M.B., & Weber, J.G. (1994). Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 268-275.
Crosby, F., Cordova, D., & Jaskar, K. (1993). On the failure to see oneself as disadvantaged: Cognitive and emotional
components. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 87-104).
New York: Harvester/Whestsheaf.
Long, K., & Spears, R. (1997). The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears,
P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A., Haslam, The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317).
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
IV.
Social Dilemmas and Mixed-Motive Situations
Insko et al. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95 – 111.
Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J.L., Insko, C.A., & Schopler, J (2003). Beyond the group mind; A quantitative
review of the interindividual-intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698 – 722.
Messick, D. M. (1991). Social dilemmas, shared resources, and social justice. In H. Steensma & R. Vermunt (Eds.)
Social justice in human relations (Vol. 2, pp. 49-69). New York: Plenum.
Allison, S. T., McQueen, L. R., & Schaerfl, L. M. (1992). Social decision making processes and the equal
partitionment of shared resources. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 28, 23-42.
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Visser, K. (1999). Locomotion in social dilemmas: How people adapt to cooperative, tit-fortat, and noncoopertative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 762-773.
IV.
Social Influence
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
Sherif, M. (1967). The self and reference groups: Meeting ground of individual and group approaches. In M. Sherif
(ed.), Social Interaction: Process and Products (pp. 223 – 239). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Crandall, C.S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 588598.
Reno, R.R., & Cialdini, R.B. & Kallgren, C.A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 104-112.
Schroeder, C.M., & Prentice, D.A. (1998). Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college
students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(23), 2150 – 2180.
9
Levine, J.M. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P.B. Paulus (ed.), The psychology of group
influence, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The Person and the Situation. New York: McGraw-Hill. (Ch. 2).
Cialdini, R.B. (1995). Principles and techniques of social influence. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology,
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 7.
Insko, C.A. et al. (1985). Conformity and gropu size: The concern with being right and the concern with being liked.
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 41 – 50.
Gaertner, L., & Insko, C.A. (2001)> On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm:
Norms as moderators fo the expression of intergroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 143 – 154.
Abrams, D., Marques, J.M., Brown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between
groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906 – 912.
BROAD THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES
I.
Evolution & Heredity
Buss, D.M., et al. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological
Science, 3(4), 251-255.
DeStano, D.A. & Salovey, P. (1996). Comments on Buss, Psychological Science, 7(6), 367-372 and 373-375.
Buss et al. (1996). Comments on DeStano, Psychological Science, 7(6), 373-375.
Tesser, A. (1993). The importance of heritability in psychological research: The case of attitudes. Psychological
Review, 98, 224-253.
II.
Culture
Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 46, 961-978.
Triandis, H.C. (1990). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506520.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Morris, M.W., & Peng, K. (1994)> Culture and cause: American and Chineses attributions for social and physical
events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949 – 971.
Schwartz, S.H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. JPSP, 53(3),
550-562.
III
Psychophysiology
10
Cacioppo, J.T., & Sandman, C.A. (1981). Psychophysiological functioning, cognitive responding and attitudes. In
Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.C., & Brock, T.C. (Eds). Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 81 – 103). New York:
Erlbaum Associates.
University #2
Readings for the Social Psychology Specialty Exam, Part 1
Updated January 2012
This is the reading list for Part I of the social psychology specialty exam. Details on the specialty exam are
provided at the end of this document (Appendix D in the Psychology Graduate Program Handbook). You
should consult with your advisor during the first year of graduate study about preparing for this exam.
See detailed instructions after the reading list.
Introductory Textbook:
Kassin, S., Fein,S., & Markus, H. R. (2011). Social psychology, eighth edition. NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Ch. 1: Introduction
Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). A history of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and
contributions to theory and application. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook
of Social Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, pp. 3-50.
Chapter 2: Doing Social Psychology Research
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological
research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 18, 16-20.
Reis, H. T., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. In S. T. Fiske, D. T.
Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, pp. 82-114.
Wilson, T. D., Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, K. (2010). The art of laboratory experimentation. In S. T. Fiske, D.
T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley, pp. 51-81.
I. Social Perception
Chapter 3: The Social Self
Brewer, M. S. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475- 482.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor:
The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
11
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the
self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656666.
Chapter 4: Perceiving Persons
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet
persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective
impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
3, 1-24.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception
and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
Chapter 5: Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental
Social Psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-52.) (note, this is quite long!)
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content:
Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
Sherif , M. (1958). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. The American Journal of
Sociology, 63, 349-356.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African
Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
II. Social Influence
Chapter 6: Attitudes
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C , & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an
unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal
and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit
cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 14641480.
12
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
50, 179-211.
Chapter 7: Conformity
Asch, S.E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the
concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
58, 305–313.
Milgram, S. (1963). The behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67,
371-378.
Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on the ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "behavioral study of
obedience." American Psychologist, 19, 421-423
Prentice, D.A., & Miller, D.T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences
of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256.
III.Social Relations
Chapter 9: Attraction and Close Relationships
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking
and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 10531073.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the
construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,
79-98.
Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration)
of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 45, 101-117.
Chapter 10: Helping Others
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., et al. (1994). Five studies
testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Puka, Bill (Ed). (1994).
Reaching out: Caring, altruism, and prosocial behavior. (pp. 76-101).
Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathyaltruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 73, 481-494.
Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional
13
variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-108.
Krebs, D. (1982). Psychological approaches to altruism: An evaluation. Ethics, 92, 447-458.
Darley, J. D., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander interventions in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.
Ch. 11 Aggression
Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51.
Anderson, C.A. et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public
Interest, 4, 81-110.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S.M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212-230.
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive
models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and
displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 75, 219-229.
IV APPLYING SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Chapter 12 Law
Brewer, N. & Wells, G.. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification:
Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Applied, 12, 11-30.
Devine, D.J., Clayton, L.D., Dunford, B.B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2000). Jury decision making 45 years of
empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622-727.
Perillo, J. T., & Kassin, S. M. (2011). Inside interrogation: The lie, the bluff, and false confessions. Law and
Human Behavior, 35, 327-337.
Chapter 13 Business
Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & NG, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A
meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,
425-445.
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise
decisions. Journal of the Academy of Management, 32, 115-130.
14
Greenberg (1988). Equity and workplace status: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73,
606-613.
Chapter 14 Health
Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C. , et al. (2002). Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 407-417.
Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Turner, R., Alper, C. M., & Skoner, D. P. (2003). Sociability and susceptibility to
the common cold. Psychological Science, 14, 389-395.
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (1996). The relationship between social support and
physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for
health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488-531.
Additional Topics Not in Textbook:
Social Psychology of Emotions
Schachter, S. & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
Cotton, J. L. (1981). A review of research on Schachter’s theory of emotion and the misattribution of
arousal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 365-397.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
Social Psychology and Culture
Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Taylor, S. E. (2009). Culture and social support. American Psychologist, 63,
518-526.
Markus, H.. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and
motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism:
Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
54, 323-338.
Social Neuroscience
Amodio, D. M. (2010). Can neuroscience advance social psychological theory? Social neuroscience for the
behavioral social psychologist. Social Cognition, 28, 695-716.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Decety, J. (2010). Social neuroscience and its relationship to social
psychology. Social Cognition, 28, 675-695.
15
Harris, L. T. & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social neuroscience evidence for dehumanized perception. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 192-231.
From the Psychology Graduate Program handbook
APPENDIX D
THE SPECIALTY EXAMINATION
A student must complete a dissertation in the specific area in which he/she completed the
Specialty Exam. If a student changes dissertation areas subsequent to completing the Specialty Exam, a
new Specialty Exam must be completed in the new dissertation area prior to advancement to candidacy.
In the case where a student is already advanced to candidacy when the change in dissertation areas is
proposed, the advancement to candidacy will be considered invalid until the new Specialty Exam is
completed.
The Structure of the Specialty Exam
Specialty Exam Part I:
The material covered by Specialty Exam Part I will come from one of the areas of the program.
This part of the exam must be completed before the spring semester of the student’s third year.
Students should request a copy of the reading list as soon as they decide on an area in which they plan to
complete their dissertation. In any event, in order to fully prepare for Specialty Exam Part I, students
should obtain their reading list by no later than the end of the first academic year.
The goal of Specialty Exam Part I is to ensure that students have sufficient background in
one of our areas to be able to teach at the 500-level. The exam has a uniform structure across areas.
Specifically, it is a take-home, two-day, open-book exam consisting of six questions, provided on
the day of the exam. The questions are based on a reading list provided by instructors in the student’s
area. The reading list in each area consists of a 500-level text as well as a set of supplementary readings
that consist of books, journal articles, and chapters (i.e., 30 to 50 articles/chapters or the equivalent in
books). Students submit no more than 25 pages of written text (one inch margins, 12-point, Times
New Roman font), plus accompanying references.
Graders will normally be the student’s dissertation advisor and one other Psychology faculty
member suggested jointly by the student and advisor. The other faculty member may be from a different
area if the student’s specialty falls between areas or if the other faculty member sharing the same
specialty is on leave.
Specialty Exam Part I is graded as a whole (pass/fail) by the two faculty graders. Because this is a
take-home exam, it is unlikely students will produce wrong answers. It is expected that graders will
determine whether answers demonstrate sufficient competency. If the two graders disagree on their
overall assessment, and if the two graders cannot reach agreement, then a third grader will be appointed
by GRAPDOC to provide a tie-breaking assessment.
If a student fails Specialty Exam Part I, graders will provide written feedback to the student. A
student who fails Specialty Exam Part I may petition the faculty for permission to retake the exam. The
faculty will grant such permission only under extraordinary circumstances (e.g., student illness). If a
student does not pass Specialty Exam Part I (or a permitted retake), s/he will be dismissed from the
program.
16
From University #3
Social Psychology Comprehensive Examination
Reading List – 2011
I. History and General Issues
Ross, Lepper, & Ward (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to theory and
application. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 1.
Reis (2008). Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. PSPR, 12, 311-339.
Leary & Hoyle (2009). Situations, dispositions, and the study of social behavior. Handbook of Individual Differences in
Social Behavior.
Wilson, Aronson, & Carlsmith (2010). The art of laboratory experimentation. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 1.
Reis & Gosling (2010). Social psychological methods outside the laboratory. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 1.
Baumeister, Vohs & Funder (2007) Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements: Whatever
Happened to Actual Behavior? Perspectives in Psychological Science
Judd & Kenny (2010). Data analysis in social psychology: Recent and recurring issues. Handbook of Social Psychology
(HSP), 5th ed., Vol. 1.
II. Classics
James, W. (1890) The Self. Ch 10 in Principles of Psychology.
Allport, G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice (Read “Preferential Thinking” Chs. 1-5)
Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological
Monographs, 70
Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological
Review, 84, 231-259.
III. Cognitive Processes
a) Mental Representations and Social Information Processing
Carlston, D. (2010). Models of implicit and explicit mental representation. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition.
Dijksterhuis (2010). Automaticity and the unconscious. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 1.
Evans (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology.
Gawronski & Sritharan (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations. Handbook of Implicit
Social Cognition.
Hofmann & Wilson (2010). Consciousness, introspection, and the adaptive unconscious. Handbook of Implicit Social
Cognition.
Roese & Sherman. (2007). Expectancy. Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.)
b) Judgments and Attributions
Vohs & Luce (2010). Judgment/decision-making. Advanced Social Psychology.
Ambady & Weisbuch (2010). Nonverbal behavior. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 1.
Bodenhausen & Todd (2010). Automatic aspects of judgment and decision making. In Gawronski & Payne (Eds.),
Handbook of implicit social cognition.
Förster & Liberman (2007). Knowledge activation. Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.)
Gilovich & Griffin (2010). Judgment and decision making. HSP, 5 th ed. Vol. 1.
Molden & Dweck (2006). Finding meaning in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception,
and social development. American Psychologist.
Petty, Briñol, Tormala, & Wegener (2007). Role of metacognition in social judgment. Handbook of basic prin. (2nd ed.)
Malle, B. (2011). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In D. Chadee, Theories in social psychology.
Trope, Liberman, & Wakslek (2007). Construal level and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction,
evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.
IV. Affective, Motivational, and Evaluative Processes
a) Affect and Motivation
Bargh, Gollwitzer, & Oettingen (2010). Motivation. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 1.
Brehm (2007). A brief history of dissonance theory. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 381-391.
Dunning (2001). Motives underlying social cognition. Blackwell Hdbk: Intraindividual processes
Keltner & Lerner (2010). Emotion. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 1.
2
Molden, D., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. Cambridge Handbook of Thinking & Reasoning.
17
Molden, Lee, & Higgins (2008). Motivations for promotion and prevention. In Shah & Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of
motivation sciences.
Weiner, B. (2000). Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attributional perspective. Educational
Psychology Review, 12, 1-14.
b) Attitudes
Ajzen & Cote (2008). Attitudes & the prediction of behavior. In Crano & Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change.
Eagly & Chaiken (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In Albarracín et al.,
Handbook of attitudes (pp. 743-767). Erlbaum.
Fazio & Olson (2007). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In Sage Handbook of Social Psychology
(concise ed.)
Gawronski & Bodenhausen (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation. Social Cognition.
Jost, Nosek, & Gosling (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on
Psych Science, 3, 126-136.
c) The Self
Swann & Bosson (2010) Self and Identity Handbook of Social Psychology (5th edition, Vol. 1)
Baumeister, Schmeichel, & Vohs (2007). Self-regulation and the executive function. Handbook of basic principles (2/ed.)
Baumeister et al. (2003). Does high self esteem cause better performance…? Psychological Science in the Public Interest.
Crocker & Park (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392-414.
Leary (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology.
Leonardelli, Pickett, & Brewer (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory. Advances in Exp. Social Psychology.
V. Interpersonal Processes
a) Social Influence & Persuasion
Albarracín & Vargas (2010). Attitudes and persuasion. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 1.
Cialdini & Griskevicius (2010). Social influence. Advanced Social Psychology.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review.
Eagly et al (2002). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles. Psych. Bulletin.
Wagner & Petty (2011). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In D. Chadee, Theories in social psychology.
b) Gender
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the
origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender. Handbook of Social Psychology (5th edition, Vol. 1)
c) Prosocial Behavior & Morality
McCullough & Tabak (2010). Prosocial behavior. Advanced Social Psychology.
Axelrod & Hamilton (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science.
Batson, Van Lange et al. (2003). Altruism and helping behavior. In Sage Handbook of Social Psych.
Becker & Eagly (2004). Heroism of women and men. American Psychologist.
Haidt & Kesebir (2010). Morality. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 2.
Tyler (2008). The psychology of cooperation. In Sullivan, Snyder, & Sullivan (Eds.), Cooperation.
d) Attraction & Relationships
Finkel & Baumeister (2010). Attraction and rejection. Advanced Social Psychology.
Eastwick & Finkel (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited. JPSP, 94, 245-264.
Reis (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1-23.
Baumeister & Leary (1995). The need to belong. Psych Bulletin.
Shaver & Mikulincer (2007). Attachment theory and research. Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.)
Rusbult & Van Lange (2008). Why we need interdependence theory. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 20492070.
Gagné & Lydon (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships. PSPR.
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds. Psych Review.
3
Reis & Aron (2008). Love: What is it, why does it matter, how does it operate? Perspectives on Psych Science, 3, 80-86.
e) Aggression & Conflict
Bushman & Bartholow (2010). Aggression. Advanced Social Psychology.
Finkel, E. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (in press). Intimate partner violence. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford
18
handbook of close relationships. Oxford: New York.
Anderson, Berkowitz, et al. (2003). Influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest.
De Dreu (2010). Social conflict. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 2.
VI. Group and Intergroup Processes
a) Basic Processes
Bodenhausen (2010). Diversity in the person, diversity in the group. European Journal of Social Psychology.
Brewer (2010). Intergroup relations. Advanced Social Psychology.
Hackman & Katz (2010). Group behavior and performance. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 2.
Schmid, Hewstone, & Al Ramiah (2011). Self categorization and social identification. In D. Chadee, Theories in social
psychology.
Pratto, Sidanius, & Levin (2007). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and
looking forward. European Review of Social Psych.
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social
change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 3-20.
Richman & Leary (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal
rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365-383.
Weber, Kopelman, & Messick (2004). A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas. PSPR.
Destin & Oyserman (2009). From assets to school outcomes. Psychological Science.
Cikara, Bruneau, & Saxe (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions, 20, 149-153.
b) Group Norms
Levine, Resnick, & Higgins (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Ann. Rev. Psychology
Miller & Prentice (1996). The construction of social norms and standards. Handbook of basic principles (1st ed.).
c) Stereotyping, Prejudice, & Social Stigma
Bodenhausen & Richeson (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. Advanced Social Psychology.
Pearson, A. R., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2009). The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive
racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 314-338
Eagly & Diekman (2005). What is the problem? Prejudice as an attitude-in-context. In Dovidio et al. (Eds.) Reflecting on
the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. (pp 19-35).
Major & O'Brien (2005). Stigma. Annual Review of Psychology.
Steele, Spencer, & Aronson (2002). Psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Exp. Soc. Psych.
Shelton, J.N. (2000). A re-conceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. PSPR, 4, 374-390.
Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities.
Current Directions, 16, 316-320.
Trawalter, S., Richeson, J.A., & Shelton, J.N. (2009). Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and
coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 243-268.
VII. Biological Perspectives
Taylor (2010). Health, stress, and coping. Advanced Social Psychology.
Neuberg, Kenrick, & Schaller (2010). Evolutionary social psychology. HSP, 5 th ed., Vol. 2.
Confer et al. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, limitations. American Psychologist,
65, 110-126.
Lieberman (2010). Social cognitive neuroscience. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 1.
Mitchell (2008). Contributions of functional neuroimaging to the study of social cognition. Current Directions, 17, 142146.
Chiao & Ambady (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In S.
Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.) Handbook of cultural psychology, Guilford.
4
VIII. Cultural Perspectives
Heine (2010). Cultural psychology. HSP, 5th ed., Vol. 2.
Cohen (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194-204.
Hong, Y.-y. (2009). A dynamic constructivist approach to culture. In Wyer et al. (Eds.), Understanding culture.
19
From University #4
General Background
 Handbook of Social Psychology
Historical Background and Historical Dialogues and Debates
A. History
 Jones, E.E. (1985). Major developments in 5 decades of social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert,
S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 1,
pp. 3-57).
 Taylor, S.E. (1998). The social being in social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G.
Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 1, pp. 58-95).
B. Historical Dialogues and Debates
 Cognitive Dissonance vs. Self-Perception vs. Self Presentation
 Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. (1959). Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
 Bem, D.J., & McConnell, H.K. (1970) Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance
phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 14, 23- 31.
 Tedeschi, J.T. & Rosenfeld, P. (1981). Impression management theory and the forced
compliance paradigm. In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social
Psychological Research, New York: Academic Press.
 Fazio, R.H., Zanna, M.P., & Cooper, J. (1977) Dissonance versus self-perception: An
integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 464-479.
 Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-266). New York: Academic
Press.
 Motivation vs. Cognition
 Kunda, Z. (1990). The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480498.
 Miller, D. T. & Ross, M. (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or
fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 2, 213-225.
 Primacy of Affect vs. Cognition
 Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American
Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
 Lazarus, R.S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124-129.
Methods and Philosophy
A. Methods
 Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for
research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
 Cambpell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the
Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 2, 81-105.
 Judd, C., & Reis, H. T. (eds.). (2000). Handbook of research methods in social and personality
psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
 McGuire, W. (1973). The Yin and Yang of Progress in Social Psychology: Seven Koan. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446-456.
20


Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on
social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 3,
515-530.
 Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and
beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 6(1),
101-115.
 Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Lorig, T. S., Norris, C. J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003).
Just because you’re imaging the brain doesn’t mean you can stop using your head: A primer and
set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 650-661.
B. Philosophy
 Manicas, P.T., & Secord, P.F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of
science. American Psychologist, 399-413.
 Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of science: An overview for cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Attitude Theory, Measurement, and Change
 Thurstone, L. L. (1928). Attitudes can be measured. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 529554.
 Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology.
 Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral
responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues, 1969, 25, 41-78.
 Azjen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of
empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 5, 888-918.
 Ostrom, T. M. (1989). Interdependence of attitude theory and measurement. In A.Pratkanis, S.
Breckler and A.Greenwald (Eds.) Attitude Structure and Function, 11-36, Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L.
Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New
York: Academic Press.
 Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as
an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology
(vol. 23, pp. 75-109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
 Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality
of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60, 181-192.
 Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological
Review, 107, 101-126.
 Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S.Nairne, I.
Neath, & A. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G.
Crowder (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
 Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in
evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin,
132, 692-731.
Automaticity and Control
 Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information
processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84 (1), 1-66.
21








Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information
processing II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological
Review, 84, 127-190.
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic
activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229- 238.
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and
control. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp.
1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of
trait construct and stereotype priming on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
32, 185-210.
Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of
stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 77(1), 167-184.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000).Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources:
Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
Wegner, D. M. (2005). Who is the controller of controlled processes? In R. R. Hassin, J. S.
Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (eds.), The new unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M.W., Nordgren, L.F., & van Baaren, R.B. (2006). On making the right
choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
Knowledge about Others (Attribution, Impression Formation, Mind Perception)

Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358–
374.

Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460.

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska
symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.

Jones, E.E. (1979). The rocky road from acts to dispositions. American Psychologist, 34, 107117.

Jones, E.E. & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person
perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York:
Academic Press.

Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological Review, 78, 171206.

Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117,
21- 38.

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution
process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10. NY: Academic
Press.

Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category Accessibility and ImpressionFormation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments
and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.

Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a 'theory of
mind'? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
22





Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: Children’s knowledge about the mind. Annual
Review of Psychology, 50, 21–45.
Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults:
Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40,
760-768.
Ames, D.R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state
inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87, 340–353.
Kozak, M., Marsh, A. A., & Wegner, D. M. (2006). What do I think you are doing? Action
identification and Mind Attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543-555.
Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 10(3), 252-264.
Judgment and Decision-Making (JDM)

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics & Biases. Science,
185, 1124-1131.

Janis, I. And Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice,
and commitment. New York: Free Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39,
341-350.

Goldstein, W.M., & Hogarth, R.M. (1997). Judgment and decision research: Some historical
context. In W.M. Goldstein and R.M. Hogarth (eds.), Research on judgment and decision making:
Currents, connections, and controversies (pp. 3-65). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hastie, R. (2001). Problems for judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology,
52, 653-683.

Hsee, C. K., Hastie, R., & Chen, J. (2008). Hedonomics: Bridging Decision Research with
Happiness Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 3, 224-243.
Motivation and Goals
 White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological
Review, 66, 297–331.
 Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments
as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
 Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the
Wason Selection Task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 10, 1379-1387.
 Balcetis, E. & Dunning, D. (2006). See what you want to see: Motivational influences on visual
perception, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 4, 612-625.
 Cesario, J., Higgins, E. T., & Plaks, J. E. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated
preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 893-910.
 Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science,
244, 933-938
 Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1999). Aspects of goal-networks: Implications for selfregulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation.
San Diego: Academic Press.
 Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle.
In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: Vol. 30 (pp. 1–46). New
York: Academic Press.
23


Emotion








Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification:
Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.
Forster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(3), 220-239.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of
emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.
Ekman, P. (1993). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169-200.
Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2,
300-319.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-214.
Gross, J.J. (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 551573.
Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other
things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,
805-819.
Lerner, J.S., and Keltner, D., (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 81(1), 146-159.
Barrett, L. F., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2007). On the automaticity of emotion. Chapter in
J. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes.
New York: Psychology Press.
Personality and Individual Differences
 Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.
Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
 Epstein, S., & O'Brien, E. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective.
Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513-537.
 Mischel, W. & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing
situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariances in personality structure.
 Funder, D.C. Towards a resolution of the personality triad: Persons, situations and
behaviors. Journal of Research in Personality, 2006, 40, 21–34.
Affiliation and Interpersonal Relationships

Byrne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and
attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36(2), 259-271.

Dutton, D., & Aron, A. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions
of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 510-517.

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal
relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 12-24.

Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of
social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 413-484). New York: Random House.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in
self. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions:
Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
24


Chartrand, T.L. & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and
social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2007). Attachment theory and research: Core concepts, basic
principles, conceptual bridges. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology:
Handbookof basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 650-677). New York: Guilford Press.
Group Processes and Social Influence
 Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
 Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67,
4, 371-378.
 Zajonc, R. B. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology. 2(2) 1966, 160-168.
 Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 1969, 12, 125-135.
 Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). Study of prisoners and guards in a simulated
prison (Naval Research Reviews 9 (1-17)). Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research.
 Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light work: The causes and
consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
 Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A
theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.),
Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). New York: Academic Press.
 Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision-making:
Biasedinformation sampling during group discussion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,
48, 1467-1478.
 Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological
Review, 93, 12-32.
Intergroup Processes
 Sherif, M. (1958). Super ordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. American Journal
of Sociology, 63, 349-356.
 Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin
and S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: BrooksCole.
 Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P. & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup
behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 149-178.
 Brewer, M. B. (1979). In group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive
motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
 Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. 1994. Social dominance orientation: A
personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 67, 741-763.
 Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Pemberton, M. B., Wieselquist, J., McIlraith, S. A., Currey, D. P., &
Gaertner, L. (1998). Long-term outcome maximization and the reduction of interindividualintergroup discontinuity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 3, 695-711.
 Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
 Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007) Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence
for four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 431-446.
25
Aggression









Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally
created "social climates.” Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-299.
Geen, R. G. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey
(Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th Edition, Volume 2, pp. 317-356).
Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S.A. (1961).Transmission of Aggression through imitation of
aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-583
Berkowitz, L., & LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 7, No. 2, 202-207.
Bandura, A. (1983) Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In R. G. Geen & E.I. Donnerstein
(Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press. Pp.140
Zillman, D. (1983) Arousal and aggression. Pp. 75-101 in R. G. Green and E.I. Donnerstein
(Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews. Vol.1. New York: Academic Press.
Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2007). Measuring the strength of the effect of violent media
on aggression. American Psychologist, 62, 253-254.
Carnagey, N. L., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2007). The effect of videogame violence
on physiological desensitization to real-life violence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
43, 3, 489-496.
Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can't join them,
beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 81, 1058-1069.
Altruism, Prosocial Behavior, Empathy
 Latane, B., & Darley, J.M. (1970). Social Determinants of Bystander Intervention in Emergencies. In
J.R. Macaulay & L.Berkowitz (Eds.) Altruism and Helping Behavior. Academic Press, Inc.
 Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and
dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-108.
 Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Betrkowitz (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). New York: Academic Press.
 Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement and relation to
prosocial behavior. Motivation & Emotion, 14, 131-149.
 Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587-610.
Stereotyping and Prejudice
 Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
 Word, C. C., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of the self-fulfilling
prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.
 Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A
cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392407.
 Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of
prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
 Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
26







Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving
devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66,
37-47.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of
stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of
African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5) 797-811.
Dovidio, J.F., & Gaertner, S.L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and
intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52, 51-75.
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R.
(2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological
Science, 15(12), 806-813.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Fallman, J. L. (2004). The automaticity of race and Afrocentric facial
features in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 6 763 - 778.
Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs,
consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316-320.
Social Cognition
 Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on
mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
 Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in
memory for behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.
 Sherman, J.W. (1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126-1141.
 Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology:
Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 4(2), 108-131.
 Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in
experimental social psychology, Vol. 35 (pp. 345-411). New York: Elsevier.
 Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry,
14, 296-303.
 Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Encoding-specific effects of social
cognition on the neural correlates of subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(21), 49124917.
 Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (in press). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social
context. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
 Gawronski & Bodenhausen (2007). What do we know about implicit attitude measures and what
do we have left to learn? In Wittenbrink & Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes:
Procedures and controversies. Guilford.
Evolution and Biological Perspectives

Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans
reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science.
Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
27


Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian rules for altruism:
Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision.
Journal of Personality and Social Pyschology, 67. 773-789.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved
dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
Gender






Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of genderrelated behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3, 369-389.
Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. (1993). A brief rejoinder:
Accuracy and objectivity on behalf of the APA. American Psychologist, 48, 55-56.
Deaux, K., & Kite, M. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.),
Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 107-139). Westport, CT: Greenwood
Press.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and
benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Psychological Review, 109, 3, 573-598.
Culture
 Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and
motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
 Miller, J. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
 Triandis, H. C. (2007). Culture and Psychology: A history of the study of their relationship. In S.
Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.) Handbook of Cultural Psychology. NY: Guilford.
 Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs.
analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
 Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 84, 60-70.
 Heine, S. J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D. R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., & Matsumoto, H. (2001).
Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of selfimproving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 599615.
 Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the role of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic
motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.
 Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture
of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945-960.
The Self
 Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7,117-140.
 Steele, C.M. (1988). The psychology of self affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In
L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 261-301.
 Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American
Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
28







Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual
Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
Swann, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and selfverification. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition.
Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1999). Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A selfcategorization perspective. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the
social self (pp. 11-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy; A theory relating self and affect, Psychological Review, 94,
319-340.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self
representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
Banaji MR, Prentice DA. 1994. The self in social context. Annual Review of Psychology, 45:297–332
Pronin, E. (2009). The introspection illusion. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology, 41.
Nonverbal Behavior
 Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor.
 Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal
consequences: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
 DePaulo, B. M. (1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 11, 203-243.
 Buck, R. (1975). Nonverbal communication of affect in children. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology. 31, 4, 644-653.
 Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S.L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial
interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62-28.
Current Trends in Social Psychology
 Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: A
source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617638.
 Pargament, K. I. (2002) The Bitter and the Sweet: An Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of
Religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13: 3, 168-181
 Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszcynski, T., Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror
management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reaction to those who violate or uphold
cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 4, 681-90.
 Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Rosenblatt A, Veeder M, et al. 1990. Evidence for terror
management theory II: the effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the
cultural worldview. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58:308–18
 Haidt, J. (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Psychological Review, 108, 814–834
 Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated
social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
 Wegner, D. M. (2004). Precis of The Illusion of Conscious Will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27,
649-692.
 Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in
Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184-211.
 Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14 (2007),
1–23.
29
From University #5
General References
Brehm, S. S., Kassin, S. M., & Fein, S. (2005). Social psychology (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.), (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
Fiske, S. T, Gilbert, D. T.,& Lindzey, G. (Eds.). (2010). The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., vols. 1-2).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2007). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New
York: Guilford Press.
Attitudes and Attitude Change
Albarracin, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cross-Cultural Psychology
Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently and why. New
York, NY: Free Press.
Personality
John, O., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (2008). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed.). New
York: Guilford Press.
Psychology and Law
Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Read, J. D., & Toglia, M. (Eds) (2007). Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology:
Memory for People. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toglia, M., Read, J. D., Ross, D. F., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2007). Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory
for Events. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Research Methods
Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1988). Controversial issues in social research methods. New York: SpringerVerlag.
Meltzoff, J. (1998). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports about mental processes.
Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
30
Reis, H.T., & Judd, C.M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanovich, K.E. (1998). How to think straight about psychology (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Self and Identity
Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of self and identity. New York: Guilford Press.
Social Cognition
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. London: MIT Press.
Journals: Current Knowledge of the Field
Students are required to be acquainted with the content of two primary American social psychology journals:
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Being
acquainted with this material means the student is expected to have read at least the abstract of all papers
published between 2 and 14 months prior to the comprehensive examination in each of the journals and to have
read some (not less than 6) complete papers from each. Knowledge of this material may be shown on the exam
in response to direct questions asking the student about the material (e.g., "What are the major current themes in
mainstream social psychology?" or "Discuss in detail the issues and/or theories raised in a recent mainstream
journal article"). Alternatively, the student would be expected to integrate their knowledge of these themes into
responses to other questions (e.g., students responding to a question about persuasion and attitude change would
be expected to include relevant information from the recent literature in their answer).
From University #6
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Ph.D. QUALIFYING EXAM READING LIST (2012)
For exam date: August 2012
1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
*Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2010). Evolutionary social psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert,
D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 761-796). Hoboken, New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Crites, S. L. (1996). Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological
arousal and response. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic
principles (pp. 72-101). New York: Guilford Press.
Jones, E. E. (1998). Major developments in five decades of social psychology. In D. L. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, &
G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 3-57). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Myers, D.; or Aronson, Wilson, & Akert. Introduction to social psychology (read any of these textbooks, most
recent edition).
31
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 8 (3) 220-247.
*The 5th edition of The handbook…is available online for free through the ISU library web site.
2. RESEARCH METHODS
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J.J., & Bushman, B.J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or
triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3-9.
*Wilson, T. D., Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, K. (2010). The art of laboratory experimentation. In Fiske, S. T.,
Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 51-81). Hoboken,
New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bonett, DG (2009). Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
Psychological Methods 14, 225-238.
*Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2010). Data analysis in social psychology: Recent and recurring issues. In Fiske,
S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 115-142).
Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of
methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for
generalized causal inference. Chapters 1-4, 14
3. AGGRESSION
Anderson, C.A., Gentile, D.A., & Buckley, K.E. (2007). Violent Video Game Effects on Children and
Adolescents: Theory, Research, and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. Chapters 2, 3, and
7.
DeWall, C. N., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). The General Aggression Model: Theoretical
extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1, 245-258. doi: 10.1037/a0023842
Miller, N., Pedersen, W. C., Earleywine, M., & Pollock, V.E. (2003). A theoretical model of triggered displaced
aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 75-97.
4. ATTITUDES & ATTITUDE CHANGE
*Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.),
Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 353-393). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviors. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M.
P. Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes, (pp. 173-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wegener, D. T., & Carlston, D. E. (2005). Cognitive processes in attitude formation and change. In D.
32
Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes, (pp. 493-542). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In C. Chaiken &
Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology/, pp. 97-116.
Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins
(Eds.), Social
psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd Ed., pp. 565-586). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151175.
5. ATTRIBUTION, REACTANCE AND DISSONANCE THEORIES
Anderson, C. A., Krull, D. S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E.T. Higgins
& A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271-296). New York:
Guilford Press.
Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1-34.
Festinger, L. & Carlsmith, M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological
Bulletin, 132(6) 895-919.
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K.E. (1965) From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L.
Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York: Academic
Press.
Kelly, H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
Stone, E. R., & Copper, J. R. (2001). A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 37, 228-243.
Wortman, C. & Brehm (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8.
6. INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION AND RELATIONSHIPS
*Clark, M. S., & Lemay, E. P. (2010). Close relationships. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.),
Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 898-941). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collins, N. L., Guichard, A. C., Ford, M. B., & Feeney, B. C. (2004). Working Models of Attachment: New
Developments and Emerging Themes. In W. S. Rholes, J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory,
research, and clinical implications (pp. 196-239). New York, NY, US: Guilford Publications
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and
development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844-872.
33
Rusbult, C., Arriaga, X., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Interdepedence in close relationships. G. J. O. Fletcher & M.
S. Clark (Eds.)., Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal Processes.
7. MOTIVATION AND EMOTION
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000), The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the
self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. Vol. 11, 227-268.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory
of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
Kunda, Z. (2001). Hot cognition: The impact of motivation and affect on judgment. In Social cognition:
Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mesquita, B., & Leu, J. (2007). The cultural psychology of emotion. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.),
Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 734-759). New York: Guilford.
Smith, C.A. & Kirby, L.D. (2000). Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion
elicitation. In J. Forgas (Ed.). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 83-106). New
York: Cambridge University.
Saarni, C., Campos, J. J., Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. (2006). Emotional development: Action,
communication, and understanding. In N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.). Handbook of Child Psychology, Sixth
Edition, Vol. 3 (pp. 226-240). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
8. THE SELF
*Swann, Jr., W. B., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and identity. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G.
(Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 589-629). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Self-Regulation and the Executive Function. In A.
W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd Ed.; pp. 516539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122,
5-37.
Hogg, M. A. (2012). Social identity and the psychology of groups. In M.R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.),
Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317-344.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and
motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
*Taylor, S. E. (2010). Health. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social
Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 698-723). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem?
34
A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435-468.
Fazio, R. H. (1987). Self-perception theory: A current perspective. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman
(Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 129-150). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
9. SOCIAL COGNITION
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2007). Principles of mental representation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social
psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd Ed., pp. 285-307). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Andersen, S. M., Moskowitz, G. B., Blair, I. V., & Nosek, B. A. (2007). Automatic thought. In A. W.
Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd Ed., pp. 138-175).
New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, F. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses.
Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social cognition: Making sense of others. In S.T. Fiske (Ed.), Social beings: Core motives in
social psychology (pp. 121-167)
Greenwald, A. G. Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A
unified theory of implicit attitudes. Psychological Review, 109, 3-25.
Krizan, Z. & Windschitl, P. D. (2007). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological
Bulletin, 133, 95-121.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus
analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences.
Psychological Review, 3, 472-489.
10. SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Asch, S. E. (1952/1972). Group forces in the modification and distortion of judgments. In E. P. Hollander & R.
G. Hunt (Eds.), Classic contributions to psychology (pp 330-339). NY: Oxford University Press.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. In R. S. Woodworth (Ed.) Archives of
psychology (No. 187, pp. 17-47).
Swann, W. B., Jr. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social
35
Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.
Schlenker, B. R. (2012). Self-presentation. In M.R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and
identity (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual
Psychology, 55, 623-655.
Review of
11. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY AND THE LAW
Wells, G. L., & Quinlivan, D. S. (2009). Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme
Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 1-24.
Wells, G. L. & Loftus, E. F. (2012, in press; ask for pdf). Eyewitness memory for people and events. Handbook
of Psychology, I. B. Weiner, Ed.(2nd Ed, pp. 617-629). New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confession evidence: A review of the literature
and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 35-69.
12.
STEREOTYPES, PREJUDICE, DISCRIMINATION
*Fiske, S. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T.,
& Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 941-982). Hoboken, New Jersey:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Brewer, M.B. (2007). The social psychology of intergroup relations: Social categorization, ingroup bias, and
outgroup prejudice. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic
principles (2nd Ed., pp. 695-715). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American
Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology
Review, 6, 242-261.
13.
TEMPERAMENT, PERSONALITY, AND BEHAVIORAL GENETICS
Caspi, A., & Roberts, B. , & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual
Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
Rothbart, M.K. & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, 6th
Ed. (pp. 99-166). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2008). Toward a unified theory of personality: Integrating dispositions and
processing dynamics within the cognitive-affective processing system (CAPS). In O. P. John, R. W. Robins,
& L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality (3rd Ed., pp. 208-241). New York: Guilford.
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal
36
personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139157.
*Funder, D. C., & Fast, L. A. (2010). Personality in social psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., &
Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edition (pp. 668-697). Hoboken, New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37
University #7
38
I. History
Ross, L., Lepper, M., & Ward, A. (2010). History of social psychology: Insights, challenges, and contributions to
theory and application. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 350). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jost, J. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social
psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 168187.
II. Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Quantitative Issues
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:
Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden (2003). The theoretical status of latent
variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219.
Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer).
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550-558. doi:10.1037/a0018933
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The
case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25.
Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere—not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 6(2), 163-171. doi:10.1177/1745691611400237
Garcia-Marques, L., & Ferreira, M. B. (2011). Friends and foes of theory construction in psychological science:
Vague dichotomies, unified theories of cognition, and the new experimentalism. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 6(2), 192-201.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2006). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–83. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for
psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 383–403.
Meiser, T. (2011). Much pain, little gain? Paradigm-specific models and methods in experimental psychology.
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 183-191.
Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 5(4), 356-377. doi:10.1177/1745691610374588
Rodgers, J. L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution.
American Psychologist, 65(1), 1-12.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological
science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276-1284.
Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57(5), 416428.
Schmidt, F. (2010). Detecting and correcting the lies that data tell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 233242. doi:10.1177/1745691610369339
Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more
effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 89(6), 845-851.
39
III. Dissonance and Related Topics
Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive
dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Beauvois, J. L., & Joule, R. V. (1999). A radical point of view on dissonance theory. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills
(Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 43-70). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological
Review, 74(3), 183-200.
Cooper, J (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
Festinger, L. (1957/1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes
explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 535–542.
Harmon-Jones, C., Schmeichel, B. J., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2010). Trait approach motivation relates to
dissonance reduction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 21-28. doi:10.1177/1948550610379425
Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Washing away postdecisional dissonance. Science, 328(5979), 709.
Leippe, M. R., & Eisenstadt, D. (1999). A self–accountability model of dissonance reduction: Multiple modes on a
continuum of elaboration. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory
in social psychology (pp. 201-232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Nail, P. R., Misak, J. E., & Davis, R. M. (2004). Self-affirmation versus self-consistency: a comparison of two
competing self-theories of dissonance phenomena. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(8), 1893–1905.
Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the
inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 47-62.
Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2008). Consequences of discrepant explicit and implicit attitudes:
Cognitive dissonance and increased information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6),
1526–1532.
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 45(1), 5-19.
van Overwalle, F., & Jordens, K. (2002). An adaptive connectionist model of cognitive dissonance. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 204-231. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_6
IV. Self-Other Asymmetry and Similarity
Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I.
Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 85-106). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Baumeister, R. F, Stillwell, A., & Wotman, S. R. (1990). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal conflict:
Autobiographical narratives about anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 994-1005.
Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2009). Egocentric pattern projection: How implicit personality theories recapitulate
the geography of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 1-16.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, E. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?
Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794.
Hodges, S. D. (2005). A feature-based model of self–other comparisons. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I.
Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp. 131-153). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Krizan, Z., & Suls, J. (2008). Losing sight of oneself in the above-average effect: When egocentrism, focalism, and
group diffuseness collide. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 929–942.
Kruger, J., Windschitl, P. D., Burrus, J., Fessel, F., & Chambers, J. R. (2008). The rational side of egocentrism in
social comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 220–232.
Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological
Bulletin, 132(6), 895-919.
Malle, B. F., Knobe, J. M., & Nelson, S. E. (2007). Actor–observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New
answers to an old question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 491-514.
40
Pronin, E. (2008). How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science, 320(5880), 1177-1180.
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369-381.
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Vevea, J. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to
Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 539-551.
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
3(2), 102-116.
Tipper, S. P., & Bach, P. (2008). Your own actions influence how you perceive other people: A misattribution of
action appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1082-1090.
Williams, E. F., & Gilovich, T. (2008). Conceptions of the self and others across time. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1037-1046.
V. Morality
A. Some Theoretical Perspectives
Aquino, K., & Reed II, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002.
doi:10.1126/science.1137651
Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social
psychology, 5th Edition (pp.797-832). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Baldacci, K. G. (2008). Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political
orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1091–1099.
Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez &
D.K. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology (pp. 341–354). New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Skitka, L. J. (2003). Of different minds: An accessible identity model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 7(4), 286-297. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_02
B. Self-Interested and Prosocial Behaviors
Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in
social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872-889.
Kogut, T. (2011). Someone to blame: When identifying a victim decreases helping. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 47(4), 748-755. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.011
Mullen, E., & Nadler, J. (2008). Moral spillovers: The effect of moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1239–1245.
Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M . I. (2005). From student to superhero: Situational primes shape future helping. Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 423-430. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.003
Pavey, L., Greitemeyer, T., & Sparks, P. (2011). Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 905-917. doi:10.1177/0146167211405994
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of
social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784. doi:
10.1037/a0020092
Teper, R., & Inzlicht, M. (2010). Active transgressions and moral elusions: Action framing influences moral
behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 284-288. doi:10.1177/1948550610389338
van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2010). Warding off the evil eye: When the fear of being envied
increases prosocial behavior. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1671-1677. doi:10.1177/0956797610385352
van Prooijen, J. W., De Cremer, D., van Beest, I., Ståhl, T., van Dijke, M., and Van Lange, P. A. M. (2008). The
egocentric nature of procedural justice: Social value orientation as a moderator of reactions to decision-making
procedures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1303-1315. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802),
1154-1156. doi:10.1126/science.1132491
41
Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism
increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49-54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02045.
D. Moralization and Rationalization
Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1618-1634. doi:10.1177/0146167210385922
Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in selfor social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875.
Jordan, A. H., & Monin, B. (2008). From sucker to saint: Moralization in response to self-threat. Psychological
Science, 19(8), 809–815.
Markman, K. D., Mizoguchi, N., & McMullen, M. N. (2008). “It would have been worse under Saddam:”
Implications of counterfactual thinking for beliefs regarding the ethical treatment of prisoners of war. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 650–654.
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social
and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344-357. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x
Peters, S. L., van den Bos, K., & Bobocel, D. R. (2004). The moral superiority effect: Self versus other differences in
satisfaction with being overpaid. Social Justice Research, 17(3), 257–273.
Proulx, T., & Heine, S. J. (2008). The case of the transmogrifying experimenter. Psychological Science, 19(12),
1294-1300.
Tsang, J. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in
immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25-50.
42
F. Construal Level Theory with Special Focus on Pertinence to Morals and Values
Agerström, J., & Björklund, F. (2009). Moral concerns are greater for temporally distant events and are moderated by
value strength. Social Cognition, 27(2), 261–282.
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209.
Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values
in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43.
Giacomantonio, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., Shalvi, S., Sligte, D., & Leder, S. (2010). Psychological distance boosts
value-behavior correspondence in ultimatum bargaining and integrative negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 46(5), 824-829. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.001
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(21), 1201-1205.
Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications
for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256–1269.
Pronin, E., Olivola, C. Y., & Kennedy, K. A. (2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others:
Psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 224-236.
Rogers, T., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(1), 1–20.
43
G. Religion
1. Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898),
58-62. doi:10.1126/science.1158757
2. Special Issue of Personality and Social Psychology Review
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140-150. doi:10.1177/1088868309353415
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7-16. doi:10.1177/1088868309350299
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2009). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of
religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126-139. doi:10.1177/1088868309352179
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., McGregor, I., & Nash, K. (2009). Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and
Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 37-48. doi:10.1177/1088868309353750
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2009). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between
socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 17-36.
doi:10.1177/1088868309351002
Vail, K. E., Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2009). A terror
management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1),
84-94. doi:10.1177/1088868309351165
VI. Hypocrisy
A. Attribution
Barden, J., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2005). “Saying one thing and doing another”: Examining the impact of
event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1463-1474.
doi:10.1177/0146167205276430
B. Induction
Aronson, E., Fried, C., & Stone, J. (1991). Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through
the induction of hypocrisy. American Journal of Public Health, 81(12), 1636-1638.
Fried, C. B. (1998). Hypocrisy and identification with transgressions: A case of undetected dissonance. Basic and
Applied Social Psychology, 20(2), 145-154.
Fried, C. B., & Aronson, E. (1995). Hypocrisy, misattribution, & dissonance reduction. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 21(9), 925-933. doi:10.1177/0146167295219007
McConnell, A. R., & Brown, C. M. (2010). Dissonance averted: Self-concept organization moderates the effect of
hypocrisy on attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 361–366.
Son Hing, L. S., Li, W., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Inducing hypocrisy to reduce prejudicial responses among aversive
racists. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(1), 71–78.
Stone, J., Wiegand, A. W., Cooper, J., & Aronson, E. (1997). When exemplification fails: Hypocrisy and the motive
for self-integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 54–65.
C. Inconsistent Attitudes and/or Behaviors
Batson, C. D, Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice:
Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335-1348.
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy:
Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525-537.
Batson, C. D, Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 330-339.
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Carpenter, A., Dulin, L., Harjusola-Webb, S., Stocks, E. L., Gale, S., et al. (2003). “...
As you would have them do unto you”: Does imagining yourself in the other’s place stimulate moral action?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1190-1201. doi:10.1177/0146167203254600
Fernandez-Dols, J. M., Aguilar, P., Campo, S., Vallacher, R. R., Janowsky, A., Rabbia, H., et al. (2010). Hypocrites
or maligned cooperative participants? Experimenter induced normative conflict in zero-sum situations. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 525-530. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.001
Krebs, D. L., & Laird, P. G. (1998). Judging yourself as you judge others: Moral development and exculpation.
Journal of Adult Development, 5(1), 1–12.
44
Lammers, J., Stapel, D. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Power increases hypocrisy: Moralizing in reasoning,
immorality in behavior. Psychological Science, 21(5), 737-744. doi:10.1177/0956797610368810
Monin, B., & Merritt, A. (2011). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity.
Upcoming in M. Mikulincer & P. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and
evil, Herzliya Series on Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 3, American Psychological Association.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological
Science, 18(8), 689-690. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01961.x
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2008). The duality of virtue: Deconstructing the moral hypocrite. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1334–1338.
45