Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
EC 201 Cal Poly Pomona Dr. Bresnock Lecture 5 Market Efficiency and Inefficiency Graph 1 Market Equilibrium and Adjustment to a Surplus Graph 2 Market Equilibrium and Adjustment to a Shortage EC 201 Dr. Bresnock Lecture 5 Price Controls -- one form of government intervention in markets. There are two types of price controls, PC. 1) Price Ceilings -- For an effective price ceiling to work, it is set so that the market price will not rise above PC. Graph 3 Price Ceiling vs Market Equilibrium (Ex. Rent control) Price Ceilings: Quantitative Effects (a) Shortage at PC (b) Misallocation of Resources = Too Little Offered = QE - QS (c) ↓TR to Seller -- Price Ceilings: TR @ Eq. = PE x QE - TR @ PC = PC x QS Unintended Consequences (a) ↓ Quality – deterioration of units, lack of upkeep (b) ↑ Search Costs – other charges (c) ↓ Gains from Trade = Deadweight Loss (d) Resources do not Flow to Highest Valued Uses – the QS units may flow to high or low valued uses (e) Conversion to Condo (f) ↓ Incentive to Build New Apartments (g) ↑ Illegal Activity -- bribery 2 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock 2) Lecture 5 Price Floor -- For an effective price floor to work, it is set so that the market price will not fall below PC . Graph 4 Price Floor vs Market Equilibrium (Ex. Agricultural price supports, U.S. and EU) Price Floors -- Quantitative Effects (a) Surplus at PC (b) Misallocation of Resources = Too Much Offered (c) ↑ TR to Seller = TR @ PC = PC x QS - TR @ Eq. = PE x QE Price Floors -- Unintended Consequences (a) ↑ Quality -- but inefficiently high (b) ↓ Gains from Trade = Deadweight Loss (c) ↑ Government Purchase and Storage Costs – opportunity costs (d) Dumping Surplus Abroad (e) Payments to Farmers Not to Plant – or to restrict acreage, burn the surplus (f) ↑ Environmental Costs (g) ↑ Illegal Activity 3 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock Lecture 5 Consumer Surplus (CS) -- the difference between the maximum amount that a person is willing to pay for each unit of a good and its current market price. Graph 5 Consumer Surplus $ 8 7 6 5 4 0 CS = $3 + $2 + $1 = $6 Market Price D = MB 1 2 3 4 5 Quantity (discrete measurement) $ 10 CS = ½ ($7 x 8) = ½ ($56) = $28 3 0 Market Price 2 4 6 D = MB 10 8 Quantity (continuous measurement) Producer Surplus – the difference between the current market price and the minimum price at which a producer would be willing to sell each unit of a good. Graph 6 Producer Surplus PS = $1 + $2 + $3 + $4 = $10 $ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 S = MC Market Price Quantity (discrete measurement) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock Graph 6 Lecture 5 Producer Surplus (cont.) PS = ½ ($2 x 8) = ½ ($16) = $8 $ S = MC 3 Market Price 1 Quantity ( continuous measurement) 0 8 How Do Producer and Consumer Surplus Relate to Market Efficiency? Graph 7 Allocative Efficiency = MB = MC $ A S = MC At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C PE E D = MB Q 0 NOTE: QE At QE total net benefits to society are maximized. Total net benefits to society are CS plus PS, or AEC. Total net benefits are also referred to as total surplus. In the next two sections, underallocation of resources (MB > MC), and overallocation or resources (MC > MB) will be presented and examples for each will be examined. When under- or overallocation of resources occur, society does not maximize total net benefits. 5 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock A. Lecture 5 Underproduction = MB > MC Graph 8 Total Net Benefits to Society are not maximized Inefficiency of Underproduction $ A S = MC Buyer’s New P =H B PE F Seller’s New P = G I At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C At Q1: CS = APEF PS = EPEFI DW Loss = BCI E D = MB Q 0 Q1 QE Dead Weight Loss (DW) -- the decrease in consumer surplus (CS) and producer surplus (PS) from producing an inefficient quantity of a good. DW represents a social loss to society. Causes of Underproduction: Obstacles to Allocative Efficiency 1) Price Ceiling (Ex. Rent Control) Graph 9 Inefficiency of Price Ceiling (PC = G) At PC: Shortage = Q2 – Q1 = DF Too Little Produced = QE – Q1 Rent $ A S = MC Buyer’s New P =H B At PE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C PE Seller’s New P = G I F E 0 D = MB Q1 QE Q2 At PC: CS = AHB PS = EGI DW Loss = BCI Max Total Search Costs = HGBI Max Unit Search Costs = HG = BI Q = Rental Units Note: At Q1 the MB > MC, total net benefits to society are not maximized. If search costs = 0, then CS = HGBI + AHB. 6 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock 2) Lecture 5 Taxes Graph 10 Inefficiency of Taxes Too Little Produced = QE – QE´ $ S´= S + Tax S = MC A B Buyer’s New P = H PE Seller’s New P = G At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C I E At Q1: CS = AHB PS = EGI DW Loss = BCI Total Tax Revenue = HGBI Tax per Unit = BI = HG D = MB Q 0 QE´ QE Note: At QE´ the MB > MC, total net benefits to society are not maximized. This is a producer-side tax, like an excise tax. Tax incidence depends on the elasticities of supply and demand. Graph 11 Inefficiency of Taxes (cont.) Too Little Produced = QE – QE´ $ A S = MC Buyer’s New P =H PE At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC B C At Q1: CS = AHB PS = EGI DW Loss = BCI Total Tax Revenue = HGBI Tax per Unit = BI = HG Seller’s New P = G I E 0 D = MB D´ = D - Tax QE´ QE Q= Note: At QE´ the MB > MC, total net benefits to society are not maximized. This is a consumer-side tax, like an excise tax. Tax incidence depends on the elasticities of supply and demand. 7 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock Graph 12 Lecture 5 Tax Incidence (or tax Burden) on Seller $ S S + Tax S PE D PE PE - Tax D 0 Q 0 Q E´ QE Q Note: In both cases above, the entire tax incidence, or tax burden, falls on the producer. In both cases the TR will decrease as a result of the tax. As noted in your text, the more relatively inelastic the supply (relative to demand), and the more elastic the demand (relative to supply), the greater the tax incidence that is places on the producer. See your text for the less extreme examples and graphs. Graph 13 Tax Incidence (or Tax Burden) on Buyer $ $ D S + Tax S PE + Tax S + Tax PE PE + Tax S PE D 0 QE ´ QE Q 0 QE Q Note: In both cases above, the entire tax incidence, or tax burden, falls on the consumer. As noted in your text, the more relatively inelastic the demand (relative to supply), and the more elastic the supply (relative to demand), the greater the tax incidence that is places on the consumer. See your text for the less extreme examples and graphs. 8 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock 3) Lecture 5 Quotas – A quota is a quantity control and is represented as Q1 below. Graph 14 Inefficiency of Quotas Too Little Produced = QE – Q1 $ Quota A S = MC Buyer’s New P =H B PE F Seller’s New P = G I At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C E 0 At Q1: CS = AHB PS = GIE DW Loss = BCI Total Max Quota Rent = HGBI Unit Max Quota Rent = HG = BI D = MB Q1 QE Q Note: At Q1 the MB > MC, total net benefits to society are not maximized. 4) Minimum Wage (WM, or PC) -- leads to less hiring than at the competitive market wage. The supply of labor (SL) comes from the employees, and the demand for labor (DL) comes from the employers. Note that the CS is the Firm’s Surplus in this application, and the PS is the Worker’s Surplus. Although more workers will want to work at the minimum wage, less than the equilibrium amount will be hired at the minimum wage. Graph 15 Inefficiency of Minimum Wage Unemployment at PC = Q2 – Q1 Too Few Hired at PC = QE – Q1 Wage $ A SL = MC PC = H WM B PE G At PE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C I At PC: CS = AHB PS = EGI + HGBI (If no search costs) DL = MB PS = EGI (If search costs = HGBI) Q = Labor DW Loss = BCI E 0 Q1 QE Q2 Note: At Q1 the MB > MC, total net benefits to society are not maximized. 9 EC 201 Dr. Bresnock Lecture 5 5) Monopoly -- market controlled by one firm. Same graph as quota graph in (3). Competitive market produces too little. B. Overproduction = MC > MB Graph 16 Inefficiency of Overproduction $ A S = MC B At QE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C PE F At Q2: I E CS = APEC + PS = EPEC MINUS DW Loss = BCI D = MB 0 QE Q2 Q Note: At Q2 the MC > MB, total net benefits to society are not maximized. Causes of Overproduction: Obstacles to Allocative Efficiency 1) Price Floor (PC) (ex. Agricultural Price Supports) Graph 17 Inefficiency of Price Floor Surplus = Q2 – Q1 Too Much Produced = Q2 - QE $ A S = MC F B Gov’t Buys at = PC At PE : CS = APEC PS = EPEC C PE At PC: Gov’t Sells at = G CS = AGI + PS = EPCB MINUS DW Loss = BCI I E D = MB 0 Q1 QE Q2 Q Total Subsidy = PCGIB Per Unit Subsidy = PCG= BI Note: At Q2 the MC > MB, total net benefits to society are not maximized. All other subsidies see price floor example above. 10