Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Supporting Information Supplementary figure legends Figure S1 Homology of GhSusA1 to other sucrose synthases The amino acid sequence of GhSusA1 was compared with the amino acid sequences of two cotton sucrose synthases and 17 SuSys from other plants. Identical amino acids were indicated by black shading, and similar amino acids were indicated by gray shading. “DxD” motif was marked with black triangles. Conserved feature sites were boxed and phosphorylate sites were marked with “P”. (Gh, Gossypium hirsutum; Cit, Citrus unshiu; Ps, Pisum sativum; Pv, Phaseolus vulgaris; St, Solanum tuberosum; Sl, Solanum lycopersicum; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bv, Beta vulgaris; Vit, Vitis vinifera; Pin, Pinus taeda; Os, Oryza sativa; Zm, Zea mays; Ta, Triticum aestivum; Bo, Bambusa oldhamii.) Figure S2 Comparison of deduced amino acid sequences of plant sucrose synthase. A phylogenetic dendrogram was generated by the multi alignment using UPGMA based on identity. The branch lengths indicate the percentage of sequence homology. The deduced amino acid sequences of plants come from the following sources: Citrus SuS1 (BAA88905), Cotton GhSus1 1 (AAD28641), Poplar (ABW76422), Pea (AAC28107), Kidney bean (AAN76498), Arabidopsis SuS4 (NP_566865), Coffee (ABI17891), Potato SuS4 (CAD61188), Potato SuS2 (AAO34668), Tomato (CAA09593), Cotton GhSus2 (CAT04586), Bamboo (AAV64256), Maize SuS1 (NP_001105323), Wheat SuS2 (CAA03935), Barley SuS2 (CAA75793), Wheat SuS1 (CAA04543), Rice SuS2 (ABL74568), Maize Sh1 (ACG43170), Sorghum 1 (ACM69042), Sugarcane SuS2 (AAF85966), Arabidopsis T2H3.8 (AAC28175), Arabidopsis SuS3 (NP_192137), Pear SuS1 (BAB20799), Citrus SuSA (BAA88904.1), Cotton GhSusA1 (HQ702185), Maize SuS2 (NP_001105194), Rice Os03g0340500 (NP_001050064), Sugar beet SuS1 (ABR87939), Potato 1 (AAO67719), Arabidopsis SuS2 (NP_199730), Grape (CAO44821), Pine (ABR15470). The black full trigles noted sucrose synthases in cotton. Figure S3 Purification of GhSusA1 recombination protein in E. coli and the enzyme activity assay. (a) SDS-PAGE gel of recombinant GhSusA1. The strains of E. coli carried a plasmid pET-30a(+)-GhSusA1 with the gene encoding Sus from cotton placed under the control of the IPTG-inducible promoter. Lane M, protein maker; Lane 1, extracts of un-induced cells; lane 2, IPTG-induced cells; Lane 3, recombinant GhSusA1 purified from the IPTG-induced E. coli culture. (b) The activities of crude protein and purified protein expressed in E. coli 2 induced by addition of IPTG. Figure S4 Genomic evolution and molecular mapping of GhSusA1. (a) Southern blotting analysis of GhSusA1 in G. hirsutum TM-1 genome. Lane 1 to 4, total DNA digested with EcoRI, HindIII, XbaI, BamHI, respectively. (b) Molecular mapping of GhSusA1 in tetraploid cotton. Genetic map was constructed using a BC1 population obtained from the interspecific cross: G. hirsutum L. acc. TM-1 × G. barbadense L. cv. Hai7124, and based on previous report from Guo et al. at 2007. Positions of GhSusA1 are underlined. Distance between loci is given in centiMorgans. Figure S5 Structures of the GhSusA1 gene in four cotton species. A and D represent G. herbaceum L. var. africanum and G. raimondii Ulbr, respectively. TM-1-At and TM-1-Dt denote A and D subgenome, respectively, of G. hirsutum L. cv. TM-1. 7124-At and 7124-Dt represent A and D subgenome, respectively, of G. barbadense L. cv. 7124. Note orthologs having the same structures among four different cotton species. Figure S6 Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and plant regeneration of G. hirsutum W0 using hypocotyls and leaves as explants. (a) – (d) Callus induction of hypocotyl and leaf segments after infected by 3 Agrobacterium. (e) – (f) Calluses excised from hypocotyl and leaf segments showing growth on media. (g) – (h) Callus multiplication; i: Embryogenic calli generated and proliferation. (i) – (j) Embryogenic lines showing differentiation of somatic embryos. (k) – (n) Plant regeneration. (o) Transgenic plants in greenhouse. (p) T1 transgenic plants in field. Figure S7 Construction and molecular identification of the sense GhSusA1 plant expression vector. (a) Structure of the GhSusA1 sense expression vector driven by the 35S promoter. (b) Southern bolt analysis of some sense-GhSusA1 transgenic lines. Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI and hybridized with a 0.75-kb fragment of the NPTII. Lane P: plasmid of 35S-SA; Lane C: non-transformed W0 plant; lane 2-15: different transgenic plants. Figure S8 Expression of GhSus1 in GhSusA1 transgenic lines and wild type plants. Expression level of GhSus1 in fibers of W0, Line 9 and Line 45 during fiber 4 elongation time 10, 15 and 20 DPA. Values are mean ± SD of three biological replicates (n = 3). Primers used for specific amplified of GhSus1 were Forward: 5’-TGTAGGTGGTGATAGGCGAAAG-3’ and Reverse: 5’-TCCTCTGCCAATGGAACTGA-3’. No significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 according to randomization one-way ANOVA test. 5 Figure S1 P P 6 7 8 9 Figure S2 Dicot Citrus SuS1 Cotton GhSUS1 Poplar Pea Kidney bean Arabidopsis SuS4 Coffee Potato SuS4 Potato SuS2 Tomato Ⅰ Cotton GhSUS2 0.05 10 Monocot Bamboo Maize SuS1 Wheat SuS2 Barley SuS2 Wheat SuS1 Rice SuS2 Maize Sh1 Sorghum 1 Sugarcane SuS2 Arabidopsis T2H3.8 Arabidopsis SuS3 Pear SuS1 Citrus SuSA Cotton GhSUSA1 Maize SuS2 Rice Os03g0340500 Sugar beet SuS1 Potato 1 Arabidopsis SuS2 Grape Pine Ⅱ Figure S3 (a) (b) -1 SuSy Activity(nmol Fru.•mgProtein•min ) KDa 97.2 92.1 1.2 1 -1 66.4 1.4 44.3 29.0 M 1 2 3 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Crude 11 Purified Figure S4 (a) 2027 bp 2322 bp 21226 bp 1 2 3 4 (b) A8(Chr.08) 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.8 2.5 2.8 3.3 3.9 4.5 NAU3207-275 NAU2914-125 NAU3632-470 NAU4045-350 NAU3199-200 NAU3769-350 GhSusA1A-108 em5DC1-300 NAU520-205 GW55-250 BNL1303-2000 NAU3058-250 JESPR90-260 D8(Chr.24) 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.3 3.2 NAU2914-225 NAU1531-240 TMA5-180 em1DC1-205 BNL3084-165 BNL2655-150 BNL2499-250 GhSusA1D-272 EM1OD26-500 BNL2568-180 NAU5335-180 NAU2292-440 12 Figure S5 13 Figure S6 a b c d e f g h i l j k m n p o 14 Figure S7 (a) (a) P-NOS NPT Ⅱ TT-NOS NOS (a) P-35S GhSUSA1 GUS T- NOS 35S -SA 35S -SA RB P-NOS NPT Ⅱ TT-NOS NOS P-35S RB GhSUSA1 GUS T- NOS LB LB (b) (b) (b) P 21226bp 21226bp 131315159 96-16-117172121 1111 2828 24 P4 46 616 16 24 27 27 27-1 27-1 C C 5148bp 5148bp 4268bp 4268bp 3530bp 3530bp 2027bp 2027bp 15 Relative Expression Figure S8 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 .8 .6 .4 .2 0.0 w0 9 45 15d 10d 20d DPA 16 Table S1 Primers for TAIL-PCR Round s 1 2 3 Type s GSP1 5’ TAIL primers (5’-3’) 3’ TAIL primers (5’-3’) GATACAGCCCTGGAAGAGT ACGGCACTGCATGGCTCA GSP2 TCTTGGTATGTGCTGGTGA CATGGCAAGGCTGGATCG GSP3 TGTAAGCCAACAAAGATGC GCTGAGGGAATTAGCAAACC DP CCNGGNGTNTGGGARTA (A/T)CAGNTG(A/T)TNGTNCTG GSP1 ATGGATGAAGAGCGGTTGG GGCAAGGCTGGATCGAGTTA GSP2 ATGGTTGTCCTCCCTACGC GSP3 TTGCTCCACGCTGAGTTCAT CCTCGTTGTTGTTGCTGGTTA C CCCAAACAAATCGAGCACGCA AP GTCGGAGTGG NGTNGCNGA(A/G)GA(C/T)ATG GSP1 GSP2 TTTAAAGACGCAGCATCGAGG T ACTGCCTCATGAATCACGGAC GSP3 G GGGGAAATGACCTGTGCAGAT AP CACGGACCGA Note: GSP is gene specific primer and AP is the arbitrary primer. 17