Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The NEW ENGLNAD JOURNAL of MEDICINE 368;18 MARCH 28, 2013 R4 박지윤/Prof . 김시영 INTRODUCTION • Breast cancer - most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer related death in women worldwide • Monitoring of treatment response of metastatic breast cancer - essential to determine benefit of therapies - treatment response : generally assessed with serial imaging but often fail to detect changes in tumor burden urgent need for biomarkers that measure tumor burden • Cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) - useful biomarker in metastatic breast cancer(sensitivity : 60-70%) - circulating tumor cells :emerged promising biomarker elevated levels of circulating tumor cells (≥ 5 cells per 7.5 ml of blood) associated with a worse prognosis • Studies using circulating tumor DNA to monitor tumor dynamics few cases of breast cancer have been analyzed PURPOSE To compare between circulating tumor DNA and other circulating biomarkers (CA 15-3, circulating tumor cells) and medical imaging for the noninvasive monitoring of metastatic breast cancer METHOD Patients and Sample Collection - prospective, single-center study, between April 2010 and April 2012 - metastatic breast cancer undergoing active treatment - 52 women recruited Identification of Somatic Genomic Alterations - sequencing from breast-cancer specimens - sequencing methods 1. tagged-amplicon deep sequencing for PIK3CA & TP53 2. paired-end whole-genome sequencing Isolation and Quantification of Circulating Tumor DNA - DNA extracted with QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit (Qiagen) - digital PCR or direct plasma sequencing by means of tagged-amplicon deep sequencing to measure genomic alterations Assay of CA 15-3 and Circulating Tumor Cells - CA 15-3 level : ADVIA Centaur immunoassay system - circulating tumor cells : CellSearch System RESULT Quantification of Circulating Tumor DNA in Plasma 1. Digital PCR assay - circulating tumor DNA detected in 18 of the 19 patients, in 80 of the 97 plasma samples (82%) 2. Tagged-amplicon deep sequencing - circulating tumor DNA identified in 11 patients, in 35 of the 44 plasma samples (80%) Tagged-amplicon deep sequencing or digital PCR assay : agreement Concurrent Monitoring of Multiple Somatic Genomic Alterations in Plasma Mutations or structural variants in tumor tissue similar dynamic pattern in plasma Multiple mutations identified in tumor tissue similar dynamic patterns in plasma Sensitivity of Circulating Tumor DNA and CA 15-3 Median Difference in Sensitivity : 26%(P< 0.002) Sensitivity of Circulating Tumor DNA and CTC Median Difference in Sensitivity : 27%(P< 0.002) CT and Circulating Biomarkers for Tumor Monitoring ctDNA, CA 15-3, CTC : Correlating with Treatment Response Circulating tumor DNA increased average 5 months before PD by imaging in 53% patients Overall Survival P = 0.03 P < 0.001 P = 0.52 Prognostic Use of Circulating Biomarkers Increasing of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA increased hazard CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept analysis showed that circulating tumor DNA is an informative, inherently specific, and highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic breast cancer.