Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CISONECC PRIORITIZES CLIMATE CHANGE ADVOCACIES for 2013-2015 By Kondwani Kalibwe Mkandawire Living Waters Radio The Civil Society Network for Climate Change CISONECC recently came up with its 2013 work plan based on key focus areas of its strategic plan. The CISONECC Advocacy Strategic Implementation Plan was reviewed to ensure relevance of advocacy issues in the overall work plan. A number of advocacy issues have been identified by the members and the need to prioritise the advocacy issues for effective advocacy was responded to. Members identified three critical issues which include the establishment of a National Implementing Entity, development of the National Action Plan (NAP) and building capacity of government representatives with improved negotiating skills at the COP. Establishment of a National Implementing Entity. The Adaptation Fund (AF), established by the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), is mandated to finance concrete adaptation projects and programmes in developing countries that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol and to allow direct access to the Fund by Parties. It is this latter characteristic – direct access – that has raised considerable interest among the international climate change community. Civil society has praised this development as an innovative element of the Fund’s governance structure that seeks to ensure country ownership. Also, if direct access proves successful, it will provide an evidence base that can serve as a model for future funding, including current discussions around the establishment of a ‘Global Green Climate Fund’. Page 1 of 3 Direct Access describes the fund-recipient relationship whereby the recipient country can access financial resources directly from the fund, or can assign an implementing entity of their choosing. Direct access is in contrast to indirect access, where funding is channeled through a third party implementing agency, usually a multilateral organization, selected by the fund administrators. The logic behind this approach is to increase the level of country ownership, oversight, and involvement in adaptation activities, and to create stronger accountability of the recipient country to the Fund. It thus removes the intermediary role by transferring the implementing agency functions from third parties to the beneficiary countries themselves. It is expected that direct access can help ensure proper reliance on and harmonization with national systems, plans and priorities; can help increase the speed of delivery of desired outcomes; cut transaction costs by ‘domesticating’ core activities; and potentially achieve better targeting of local priorities (Adaptation Fund, 2009a). It is on this basis that CISONECC members decided to lobby government to establish a National Implementing Entity to enable Malawi to directly access funds under different global climate change funds. Development of the National Action Plan. The operations of the NIE can only be effective though if Malawi develops implementing mechanism such as the NAMA and the NAP. Aware of this fact, CISONECC has included in its priority advocacy issues the development of a NAP and the review of the NAPA and the NAMA. Critical issues affecting vulnerable communities that work with CISONECC member organisations will have to be included in these instruments to ensure responsiveness. Building capacity of government representatives with improved negotiating skills for COP. National advocacy efforts by networks like CISONECC are intended to complement government efforts in lobbying for relevant and responsive policies at the international platform. It is therefore imperative that those that are entrusted to advance the Malawi climate change agenda at the international forums should be competent. So far Malawi is under-represented at the COP in terms of numbers and negotiating skills which has prompted CISONECC to take up the issue of capacity building in this context to contribute towards improving competency among Malawi negotiators at future COP meetings. Several other pertinent issues have also been identified for advocacy in the 2013/2014 work plan but the three issues will be given the utmost attention. “the reason we are want to prioritise these issues is to enable us focus as a network on which issues we want government to pay attention to and act speedily on for the good of the country in terms of addressing climate change issues” Melton Luhanga, CISONECC chairman reiterated. The network has also adopted a ‘thematic working group’ approach in addressing advocacy issues. The approach is supposed to improve the way the network engages with government and other stakeholders in the different themes around climate change. It is also seen to help improve members’ focus and learning processes within the network. Page 2 of 3 “One aspect of CISONECC as a network is to encourage exchange of information and experiences among member organisations and we believe by having thematic working groups within the network, members will learn from each other and eventually make CISONECC very effective when it comes to advocacy on different thematic areas” said Herbert Mwalukomo, CISONECC coordinator. Climate change represents one of the greatest environmental, social, and economic threats facing the planet today. In developing countries, climate change has the most significant impact on the livelihoods and living conditions of the poor. It is a particular threat to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and progress in sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Increasing temperatures and shifting rain patterns across Africa reduce access to food and create effects that impact regions, farming systems, households, and individuals in varying ways. Additional global changes, including changed trade patterns and energy policies, have the potential to exacerbate the negative effects of climate change on some of these systems and groups. Thus, analyses of the biophysical and socioeconomic factors that determine exposure, adaptation, and the capacity to adapt to climate change are urgently needed so that policymakers can make more informed decisions. Lastly, this in underscores the importance of coalitions like the Civil Society Network on Climate Change whose members have responded to the call of building a climate change-resilient Malawi. Page 3 of 3