Download Mea Culpa - Econ

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup

Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup

Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup

Business cycle wikipedia , lookup

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

2008–09 Keynesian resurgence wikipedia , lookup

Keynesian economics wikipedia , lookup

Post-war displacement of Keynesianism wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Mea Culpa
I find it very difficult to say anything bad about the Republican party. After all, this is the party
which was founded to eliminate the original sin of the United States ; slavery. It is the party
which fought the racist Jim Crow laws of the southern Democrats and pushed, against
opposition from Democrats in Congress, for an anti lynching bill. It is the party which, through
Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, stopped the onward march of collectivism,
proved Marx’s ‘laws of motion’ to be the fantasies they were and defended the liberal freedoms
of the enlightenment.
But the GOP is going to have to offer up a few mea culpa’s. The mid terms of 2010 and the
Presidential election in 2012 are likely to be focused on the dire state of the American economy.
If the GOP are to fight the spendaholic suicide of the Democrats in the White House and
Congress they need to make a confession; they are partly responsible.
In 2001 the American economy was reeling from the twin shocks of the bursting of the dot com
bubble in stocks and the 9/11 attacks. As a new book by Charles K Rowley and Nathanael Smith*
shows, during the 1980’s the tight monetary policy of Paul Volcker’s Federal Reserve offset the
loose fiscal policy of the Reagan deficits. In the 1990s, by contrast, the loose monetary policy of
the Greenspan Fed was offset by the tight fiscal policy of the Congressional Republicans. “So, in
the two decades before 2000”, Rowley and Smith write,
“fiscal and monetary policies tended to offset each other, and were never both
expansionary at the same time”
In reaction to the shocks of 2001 this was changed. Bush Jnr embarked on a massive program of
Keynesian stimulus spending. From a budget surplus of $236 billion in Clinton ’s last year in
office the Federal budget plunged into deficit to the tune of $413 billion in 2004. As is commonly
held, this was not the result of tax cuts. As Rowley and Smith point out “Tax revenues and social
insurance contributions in 2007, at $13,866 per capita, were higher than their 2000 levels”.
From 1992 Federal spending per capita held steady at $12,500 per annum. From 2001 it began
climbing by 2.45% per annum climbing to nearly $15,000 in 2008.
Dick Cheney defended the ballooning deficit with the ludicrous assertion that “Reagan proved
deficits don't matter”. But, as we’ve seen, Reagan’s deficits were offset by the monetary
tightness of the Federal Reserve. No such restraint was offered by Alan Greenspan. Over the
course of 2001 the Fed Funds Rate was repeatedly slashed from 6.25% to 1.75%.
These Keynesian mistakes led directly to the current mess. From mid 2004 Greenspan began
trying to mop up some of the money he had sprayed around to soften the landing of 2001. By
mid 2006 the Fed Funds Rate was back up over 5% and many Americans, who had taken on the
adjustable rate mortgages Greenspan himself had recommended in early 2004, found
themselves unable to keep up repayments. The rest, as they say, is history.
Out of simple honesty the GOP needs to acknowledge the disastrous economic policies of the
Bush administration. But aside from offering up a dose of humility which could be a welcome
tonic to the hubris and arrogance of Obama, Pelosi and Co, this would offer an opportunity for
the Republicans. When looked at more closely we see an object lesson in the downside of crude
Keynesianism and a warning of a grim future stemming directly from this administrations
woefully misguided policies.
Bush’s expansionary fiscal stance was mild compared to Obama’s eye watering $1.6 trillion
deficit forecast this year. The Fed Funds Rate, at a range of between 0% and 0.25%, is lower
than even Greenspan dared go. And we saw where that got us. The recession of 2001 – 2002
was one of the shallowest on record but this was bought with Keynesian policies at the price of
the greater meltdown we face now. But then Keynes himself, the intellectual giant so much back
in vogue, simply shrugged his shoulders when faced with this and famously declared “In the long
run we are all dead”.
Well Keynes might be but we are stuck with the fallout of such glib, short termist thinking. The
philosopher George Santayana wrote “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to
repeat it”. Remembering the doomed Keynesian policies of the Bush administration might be
difficult for Republicans going into elections. But if the American economy is going to return to
the growth and job creation which is the source of real, long term prosperity, the failure of these
policies needs to be highlighted. And if they can prove they have learned from their mistakes,
the GOP might be best placed to make the case.
* ‘Economic Contractions in the United States – A Failure of Government’ by Charles K Rowley
and Nathanael Smith
(ReaganSauce, 12th November 2009)