Survey

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

no text concepts found

Transcript

Scientific Notation Chemistry deals with very large and very small numbers. Consider this calculation: (0.000000000000000000000000000000663 x 30,000,000,000) ÷ 0.00000009116 Hopefully you can see, how awkward it is. Try keeping track of all those zeros! In scientific notation, this problem is: (6.63 x 10¯31 x 3.0 x 1010) ÷ 9.116 x 10¯8 It is now much more compact, it better represents significant figures, and it is easier to manipulate mathematically. The trade-off, of course, is that you have to be able to read scientific notation. This lesson shows you (1) how to write numbers in scientific notation and (2) how to convert to and from scientific notation. As you work, keep in mind that a number like 9.116 x 10¯8 is ONE number (0.00000009116) represented as a number 9.116 and an exponent (10¯8). Format for Scientific Notation 1. Used to represent positive numbers only. 2. Every positive number X can be written as: (1 < N < 10) x 10some positive or negative integer Where N represents the numerals of X with the decimal point after the first nonzero digit. 3. A decimal point is in standard position if it is behind the first non-zero digit. Let X be any number and let N be that number with the decimal point moved to standard position. Then: If 0 < X < 1 then X = N x 10negative number If 1 < X < 10 then X = N x 100 If X > 10 then X = N x 10positive number 4. Some examples of number three: 0.00087 becomes 8.7 x 10¯4 9.8 becomes 9.8 x 100 (the 100 is seldom written) 23,000,000 becomes 2.3 x 107 5. Some more examples of number three: 0.000000809 becomes 8.09 x 10¯7 4.56 becomes 4.56 x 100 250,000,000,000 becomes 2.50 x 1011 Note that standard position for the decimal place is always just to the right of the first non-zero digit in the number. Also, it is the first non-zero digit counting from the left of the number. Another way to remember standard position is that it will always produce a number between 1 and 10. For example 45.91 x 10¯7 is not in correct scientific notation. However, the Chemists wishes to stress that it is a correct number, it is just not in scientific notation. As a rule of thumb, you generally need not convert numbers where the absolute value exponent will be 3 or less. However, exceptions do exist and this is only practice in the Chemists's classroom. Your instructor may have a different standard for you to obey. Example #1 - Convert 29,190,000,000 to scientific notation. The answer will be written assuming four significant figures. However, if you are not sure of significant figures, don't worry - you'll get to it. The solving process is simply one of factoring this number, but in a particular way. For example, 5,838,000,000 times 5 is not the correct way, even though this is a correct factoring of the original number. First Explanation Step 1 - start at the decimal point of the original number and count the number of decimal places you move, stopping to the right of the first non-zero digit. Remember that's the first non-zero digit counting from the left. Step 2 - The number of places you moved (10 in this example) will be the exponent. If you moved to the left, it's a positive value. If you moved to the right, it's negative. The answer is 2.919 x 1010. Second Explanation Step 1 - Write all the significant digits down with the decimal point just to the right of the first significant digit. Like this: 2.919. Reminder: be aware that this process should ALWAYS result in a value between 1 and 10. Step 2 - Now count how many decimal places you would move from 2.919 to recover the original number of 29,190,000,000. The answer in this case would be 10 places to the RIGHT. That is the number 10,000,000,000. Written in exponential notation, it would be 1010. To emphasize the factoring idea, we would have this: 2.919 x 10,000,000,000 = 29,190,000,000 Step 3 - Write 2.919 times the other number, BUT, write the other number as a power of 10. The number of decimal places you counted gives the power of ten. In this example, that power would be 10 also. The correct answer to this step is: 2.919 x 1010 Please note the the value of the exponent is positive, because you counted to the RIGHT in step 2. It may help to think of scientific notation as simply factoring a number, only you are following rules which dictate how to write the two factors. The first factor is always between one and ten, while the second factor is always some power of 10. Example 2 - Write 0.00000000459 in scientific notation. Step 1 - Write all the significant digits down with the decimal point just to the right of the first significant digit. Like this: 4.59. Please be aware that this process should ALWAYS result in a value between 1 and 10. Step 2 - Now count how many decimal places you would move from 4.59 to recover the original number of 0.00000000459. The answer in this case would be 9 places to the LEFT. That is the number 0.000000001. Be aware that this number in exponential notation is 10¯9. To emphasize the factoring idea, we would have this: 4.59 x 0.000000001 = 0.00000000459 Step 3 - Write 4.59 times the other number, BUT, write the other number as a power of 10. The number of decimal places you counted gives the power of ten. In this example, that power would be 9. The correct answer to this step is: 4.59 x 10¯9 Please note the the value of the exponent is negative, because you counted to the LEFT in step 2. Keep in mind two important ideas when converting to scientific notation: how many decimal places did you move and in what direction. Both of these affect the power of ten. Also keep in mind that your answer in scientific notation will always equal the original value. Suprising as it may seem, students in the Chemists classroom make this elementary mistake. Now, convert both of these to scientific notation, and then click the value to see the answer and an explanation. 35,800,000,000,000 The answer is 3.58 x 1013 1. Write all significant figures as a number between 1 and 10. Do this by putting a decimal point just to the right of the first non-zero digit. 2. Count the number of decimal places needed to get back to the original starting number, while noting the direction you must move to do that. 3. Write step one times step two, but write step two in exponential notation. The number of decimal places moved gives the exponent value and the direction moved gives the sign (left = positive; right = negative). Note that the exponent indicates HOW MANY places the decimal point was moved and the sign of the exponent indicates the DIRECTION of the movement. There were then two graphics showing with arrows the movement of the decimal point. In this problem, the decimal point was moved 13 places to the LEFT (positive exponent). 0.00000000821 The answer is 8.21 x 10¯9 1. Write all significant figures as a number between 1 and 10. Do this by putting a decimal point just to the right of the first non-zero digit. 2. Count the number of decimal places needed to get back to the original starting number, while noting the direction you must move to do that. 3. Write step one times step two, but write step two in exponential notation. The number of decimal places moved gives the exponent value and the direction moved gives the sign (left = positive; right = negative). Note that the exponent indicates HOW MANY places the decimal point was moved and the sign of the exponent indicates the DIRECTION of the movement. In this problem, the decimal point was moved 9 places to the RIGHT (negative exponent). Suppose the number to be converted looks something like scientific notation, but it really isn't. For example, look carefully at the example below. Notice that the number 428.5 is not a number between 1 and 10. Although writing a number in this fashion is perfectly OK, it is not in standard scientific notation. What would it look like when converted to standard scientific notation? Example #3 - Convert 428.5 x 109 to scientific notation. Step 1 - convert the 428.5 to scientific notation. (The lesson up to this point has been covering how to do just this step). Answer = 4.285 x 102. Step 2 - write out the new number. Answer = 4.285 x 102 x 109. Step 3 - combine the exponents according to the usual rules for exponents. Answer = 4.285 x 1011. You don't know the rules for exponents. Exponent Rules 1) When exponents are multiplied, you add them. 103 x 102 = 105 2) When exponents are divided, you subtract them. 103 ÷ 102 = 101 3) When parenthesis are involved, as in the example, you multiply. (103)2 = 106 Example #4 - convert 208.8 x 10¯11 to scientific notation. Step 1 - convert the 208.8 to scientific notation. Answer = 2.088 x 102. Step 2 - write out the new number. Answer = 2.088 x 102 x 10¯11. Step 3 - combine the exponents according to the usual rules for exponents. Answer = 2.088 x 10¯9. Now, convert both of these to scientific notation, then click the value to see the answer and an explanation. 0.000531 x 1014 Convert 0.000531 x 1014 to scientific notation. Step 1 - convert the 0.000531 to scientific notation. Answer = 5.31 x 10¯4. Step 2 - write out the new number. Answer = 5.31 x 10¯4 x 1014. Step 3 - combine the exponents according to the usual rules for exponents. Answer = 5.31 x 1010. 0.00000306 x 10¯17 Convert 0.00000306 x 10¯17 to scientific notation. Step 1 - convert the 0.00000306 to scientific notation. Answer = 3.06 x 10¯6. Step 2 - write out the new number. Answer = 3.06 x 10¯6 x 10¯17. Step 3 - combine the exponents according to the usual rules for exponents. Answer = 3.06 x 10¯23. 1. When converting a number greater than one (the 428.5 and the 208.8 in the previous examples), the resulting exponent will become more positive (11 is more positive than 9 while -9 is more positive than -11). 2. When converting a number less than one (the 0.000531 and the 0.00000306 in the previous examples), the resulting exponent will always be more negative (10 is more negative than 14 and -23 is more negative than -17). Another way to put it: If the decimal point is moved to the left, the exponent goes up in value (becomes more positive). If the decimal point is moved to the right, the exponent goes down in value (becomes more negative). Practice Problems Convert to scientific notation: 1) 28,000,000 2) 305,000 3) 0.000000463 4) 0.000201 5) 3,010,000 6) 0.000000000000057 7) 20,100 8) 0.00025 9) 65,000,000,000,000,000 10) 8.54 x 1012 11) 2101 x 10¯16 12) 305.1 x 107 13) 0.0000594 x 10¯16 14) 0.00000827 x 1019 15) 386 x 10¯22 16) 2511 x 1012 17) 0.000482 x 10¯12 18) 0.0000321 x 1012 19) 288 x 105 20) 4.05 x 1011 The answers: 1) 2.8 x 107 2) 3.05 x 105 3) 4.63 x 10¯7 4) 2.01 x 10¯4 5) 3.01 x 106 6) 5.7 x 10¯14 7) 2.01 x 104 8) 2.5 x 10¯4 9) 6.5 x 1016 10) already in scientific notation 11) 2.101 x 10¯13 12) 3.051 x 109 13) 5.94 x 10¯21 14) 8.27 x 1013 15) 3.86 x 10¯20 16) 2.511 x 1015 17) 4.82 x 10¯16 18) 3.21 x 107 19) 2.88 x 107 20) already in scientific notation Math with Scientific Notation Addition and Subtraction Speaking realistically, the problems discussed below can all be done on a calculator. However, you need to know how to enter values into the calculator, read your calculator screen, and round off to the proper number of significant figures. Your calculator will not do these things for you. All exponents MUST BE THE SAME before you can add and subtract numbers in scientific notation. The actual addition or subtraction will take place with the numerical portion, NOT the exponent. The student might wish to re-read the above two sentences with emphasis on the emphasized portions. It might be advisable to point out again - DO NOT, under any circumstances, add the exponents. Example #1: 1.00 x 103 + 1.00 x 102 A good rule to follow is to express all numbers in the problem in the highest power of ten. Convert 1.00 x 102 to 0.10 x 103, then add: 1.00 x 103 + 0.10 x 103 = 1.10 x 103 Example #2: The significant figure issue is sometimes obscured when numbers are in scientific notation. For example, add the following four numbers: (4.56 x 106) + (2.98 x 105) + (3.65 x 104) + (7.21 x 103) When the four numbers are written in the highest power, we get: 4.56 0.298 0.0365 + 0.00721 = 4.90171 x x x x x 106 106 106 106 106 The answer upon adding must be rounded to 2 significant figures to the right of the decimal point, thus giving 4.90 x 106 as the correct answer. Generally speaking, you can simply enter the numbers into the calculator and let the calculator keep track of where the decimal portion is. However, you must then round off the answer to the correct number of significant figures. Lastly, be warned about using the calculator. Students often push buttons without understanding the math behind what they are doing. Then, when the teacher questions their work, they say "Well, that's what the calculator said!" As if the calculator is to blame for the wrong answer. Remember, it is your brain that must be in charge and it is you that will get the points deducted for poor work, not the calculator. Practice Problems 1) (4.52 x 10¯5) + (1.24 x 10¯2) + (3.70 x 10¯4) + (1.74 x 10¯3) 2) (2.71 x 106) - (5.00 x 104) Reminder: you must have the same exponent on each number of the problem. 1) On the calculator, the answer to this problem is 1.4555 x 10¯2. Rounding to the correct number of significant figures (two past the decimal point) and using the rule for rounding with five, the correct answer is 1.46 x 10¯2. 2) 2.66 x 106. Math with Scientific Notation Multiplication and Division Speaking realistically, the problems discussed below can all be done on a calculator. However, you need to know how to enter values into the calculator, read your calculator screen, and round off to the proper number of significant figures. Your calculator will not do these things for you. In addition, it is more than likely your instructor has good estimation skills and can look at problems set up in scientific notation and come very close mentally to the correct answer. The Chemists feels this is an excellent skill to have. Sometimes a student gives an answer in the Chemists's classroom and it does not feel right. This is because the Chemists does have these estimation skills. You should too. (3.40 x 1015) x (8.58 x 10¯10) How do you go about solving the above problem? How many significant figures will be in the answer? The issue of significant figures is discussed elsewhere, so if you do not know what they are right now, that's OK. Later on, when you are more well-versed in significant figures, you might want to review these words. By the way, the answer to the above problem to the correct number of significant figures is 2.92 x 106. The calculator answer (2917200) contains too many significant figures. Lastly, these instructions are aimed at calculators using algebraic logic. Those that use Reverse Polish Notation, such as most Hewlett-Packard calculators, will not be covered below. When multiplying numbers in scientific notation, enter one number into the calculator and multiply it by the other. The calculator should give you the number in proper scientific notation. You will need to read your calculator properly as well as round off the number to the correct number of significant figures. Here is a sample problem: (3.05 x 106) x (4.55 x 10¯10) You should consult your calculator manual for information on how to enter numbers in scientific notation into the calculator. The right way involves the use of a key usually marked "EXP" or "EE." A usual wrong way involves using the times key, where the student presses times then 10 then presses the "EXP" key. Typically, this is announced by the student confidently saying, "Uh, <substitute name of teacher here>, your value is off by a factor of 10, the correct exponent should be 7, not 6." Depending on your teacher's mood and personality, the response will range from a nice explanation of why you are wrong to an insulting one. Double- and triple- check your work before announcing confidently to the teacher that they are wrong. The calculator gives 1.3878 x 10¯3 for the above problem. Rounded to three significant figures, the correct answer is 1.39 x 10¯3. If you were to write all the displayed digits down for your answer, you would be wrong. When you are dividing using the calculator, there is an additional factor to be aware of. Division is not commutative like multiplication, so the order in which numbers are entered into the calculator for division is important. Also, it is important to realize that while there are two phrases which can be used for problems, "divided by" and "divided into," the calculator uses only the first. If the phrase is "divided by" as in this problem: 2.4 x 10¯4 divided by 3.4 x 105, then you enter the numbers into the calculator in the order written. However, if this is the problem: 2.4 x 10¯4 divided into 3.4 x 105, then you reverse the written order when entering the numbers into the calculator. Sometimes the calculator will give the answer in the usual way (e.g., 0.00084). Often, a calculator will have a way to convert between the usual way (technically called floating point notation) and scientific notation. Consult the manual that came with your calculator for more information. If it does not have this capacity, you will have to do it manually by counting decimal places. The biggest error Chemists students make is in reading the calculator screen and then writing the answer down on paper. No matter how hard he tries, it seems the Chemists coach cannot eradicate this error. For example, let us suppose the answer to some problem is 2.35 x 10¯5. Here is how many calculators represent this number on their screen: 2.35¯5 What happens is that the student writes what he or she sees on the calculator screen and never thinks about what is being written. The problem is that 2.35¯5 is NOT the same numerical value as 2.35 x 10¯5. What has happened is that the student is ignoring the context the numbers are being shown in. 2.35¯5 is simply the calculator's shorthand way to show 2.35 x 10¯5. In the context of the calculator screen, 2.35¯5 is understood as shorthand for scientific notation. On a piece of paper, 2.35¯5 is something completely different. The calculator screen is not sacred. This is how the mental estimation referred to above is done. Multiply the decimal portions and add the exponential portions. (Remember that adding exponents is how to multiply them.) Here is a sample problem: (3.05 x 106) x (4.55 x 10¯10) Here is the rearranged problem: (3.05 x 4.55) x (106 x 10¯10) This can be done since multiplication is commutative. The exponent is easy, since 6 plus negative 10 is negative 4. 3.05 x 4.55 is easy too. You know it will be a bit bigger than 12, so you estimate 13. You now have 13 x 10¯4. So the teacher says out loud, "Well it's about 1.3 or 1.4 times ten to the negative three." And you, the Chemists kid, are astonished. It's like magic! Nah, just a good sense of numbers and the rules which govern them. Suppose it was division, rather than multiplication. Using the previous sample problem numbers set up as division: (3.05 x 106) ÷ (4.55 x 10¯10) Here is the rearranged problem: (3.05 ÷ 4.55) x (106 ÷ 10¯10) The exponent is easy, since 6 minus negative 10 is positive 16. Remember that to divide exponents, you subtract them. 3.05 ÷ 4.55 is easy too. You know it will be a bit less than 0.75, so you estimate 0.7. You now have 0.7 x 1016. So the teacher says out loud, "Well it's about 7 times ten to the fifteen." And once again you, the Chemists kid, are astonished. It's like magic! Nah, just a good sense of numbers and the rules which govern them. Practice Problems 1) (2.68 x 10¯5) x (4.40 x 10¯8) 2) (2.95 x 107) ÷ (6.28 x 1015) 3) (8.41 x 106) x (5.02 x 1012) 4) (9.21 x 10¯4) ÷ (7.60 x 105) Reminders 1) Double check each calculator entry for correctness. Once you begin entering the new number, the old one is removed from the display. Often students seem to automatically assume the answer on the display is correct. 2) Try for reasonable approximations mentally. For example, in (3) above 8.41 x 5.02 is around 40 and 106 x 1012 is 1018. So the approximate answer is around 40 x 1018 or 4 x 1019. Try and predict (3) as a division, not multiplication. 3) Remember, if you struggle with entering numbers in scientific notation into your calculator, check your calculator manual or get some live help. 1) (2.68 x 10¯5) x (4.40 x 10¯8) The calculator display gives 1.1792 x 10¯12. Rounded off to three significant figures gives 1.18 x 10¯12 as the answer. 2) (2.95 x 107) ÷ (6.28 x 1015) The calculator display gives 4.6975 x 10¯9. Rounded off to three significant figures gives 4.70 x 10¯9 as the answer. 3) (8.41 x 106) x (5.02 x 1012) The calculator display gives 4.2218 x 1019. Rounded off to three significant figures gives 4.22 x 1019 as the answer. When done as a division, the answer to this problem is 1.68 x 10¯6. 4) (9.21 x 10¯4) ÷ (7.60 x 105) The calculator display gives 1.2118 x 10¯9. Rounded off to three significant figures gives 1.21 x 10¯9 as the answer. Significant Figure Rules There are three rules on determining how many significant figures are in a number: 1. Non-zero digits are always significant. 2. Any zeros between two significant digits are significant. 3. A final zero or trailing zeros in the decimal portion ONLY are significant. Focus on these rules and learn them well. They will be used extensively throughout the remainder of this course. You would be well advised to do as many problems as needed to nail the concept of significant figures down tight and then do some more, just to be sure. Please remember that, in science, all numbers are based upon measurements (except for a very few that are defined). Since all measurements are uncertain, we must only use those numbers that are meaningful. A common ruler cannot measure something to be 22.4072643 cm long. Not all of the digits have meaning (significance) and, therefore, should not be written down. In science, only the numbers that have significance (derived from measurement) are written. If you're not convinced significant figures are important, you may want to read this Significant Figure Fable. Rule 1: Non-zero digits are always significant. Hopefully, this rule seems rather obvious. If you measure something and the device you use (ruler, thermometer, triple-beam balance, etc.) returns a number to you, then you have made a measurement decision and that ACT of measuring gives significance to that particular numeral (or digit) in the overall value you obtain. Hence a number like 26.38 would have four significant figures and 7.94 would have three. The problem comes with numbers like 0.00980 or 28.09. Rule 2: Any zeros between two significant digits are significant. Suppose you had a number like 406. By the first rule, the 4 and the 6 are significant. However, to make a measurement decision on the 4 (in the hundred's place) and the 6 (in the unit's place), you HAD to have made a decision on the ten's place. The measurement scale for this number would have hundreds and tens marked with an estimation made in the unit's place. Like this: Rule 3: A final zero or trailing zeros in the decimal portion ONLY are significant. This rule causes the most difficulty with Chemists students. Here are two examples of this rule with the zeros this rule affects in boldface: 0.00500 0.03040 Here are two more examples where the significant zeros are in boldface: 2.30 x 10¯5 4.500 x 1012 What Zeros are Not Discussed Above Zero Type #1: Space holding zeros on numbers less than one. Here are the first two numbers from just above with the digits that are NOT significant in boldface: 0.00500 0.03040 These zeros serve only as space holders. They are there to put the decimal point in its correct location. They DO NOT involve measurement decisions. Upon writing the numbers in scientific notation (5.00 x 10¯3 and 3.040 x 10¯2), the non-significant zeros disappear. Zero Type #2: the zero to the left of the decimal point on numbers less than one. When a number like 0.00500 is written, the very first zero (to the left of the decimal point) is put there by convention. Its sole function is to communicate unambiguously that the decimal point is a deciaml point. If the number were written like this, .00500, there is a possibility that the decimal point might be mistaken for a period. Many students omit that zero. They should not. Zero Type #3: trailing zeros in a whole number. 200 is considered to have only ONE significant figure while 25,000 has two. This is based on the way each number is written. When whole number are written as above, the zeros, BY DEFINITION, did not require a measurement decision, thus they are not significant. However, it is entirely possible that 200 really does have two or three significnt figures. If it does, it will be written in a different manner than 200. Typically, scientific notation is used for this purpose. If 200 has two significant figures, then 2.0 x 102 is used. If it has three, then 2.00 x 102 is used. If it had four, then 200.0 is sufficient. See rule #2 above. How will you know how many significant figures are in a number like 200? In a problem like below, divorced of all scientific context, you will be told. If you were doing an experiment, the context of the experiment and its measuring devices would tell you how many significant figures to report to people who read the report of your work. Zero Type #4: leading zeros in a whole number. 00250 has two significant figures. 005.00 x 10¯4 has three. Exact Numbers Exact numbers, such as the number of people in a room, have an infinite number of significant figures. Exact numbers are counting up how many of something are present, they are not measurements made with instruments. Another example of this are defined numbers, such as 1 foot = 12 inches. There are exactly 12 inches in one foot. Therefore, if a number is exact, it DOES NOT affect the accuracy of a calculation nor the precision of the expression. Some more examples: There are 100 years in a century. 2 molecules of hydrogen react with 1 molecule of oxygen to form 2 molecules of water. There are 500 sheets of paper in one ream. Interestingly, the speed of light is now a defined quantity. By definition, the value is 299,792,458 meters per second. Practice Problems Identify the number of significant figures: 1) 3.0800 2) 0.00418 3) 7.09 x 10¯5 4) 91,600 5) 0.003005 6) 3.200 x 109 7) 250 8) 780,000,000 9) 0.0101 10) 0.00800 1) 3.0800 - five significant figures. All the rules are illustrated by this problem. Rule one - the 3 and the 8. Rule Two - the zero between the 3 and 8. Rule three - the two trailing zeros after the 8. 2) 0.00418 - three significant figures: the 4, the 1, and the 8. This is a typical type of problem where the student errs by giving five significant figures as the answer. 3) 7.09 x 10¯5 - three significant figures. When a number is written in scientific notation, only significant figures are placed into the numerical portion. If this number were taken out of scientific notation, it would be 0.0000709. 4) 91,600 - three significant figures. The last two zeros are not considered to be significant (at least normally). Suppose you had information that showed the zero in the tens place to be significant. How would you show it to be different from the zero in the ones place, which is not significant? The answer is scientific notation. Here is how it would be written: 9.160 x 104. This CLEARLY indicates the presence of four significant figures. 5) 0.003005- four significant figures. No matter how many zeros there are between two significant figures, all the zeros are to be considered significant. A number like 70.000001 would have 8 significant figures. 6) 3.200 x 109 - four significant figures. Notice the use of scientific notation to indicate that there are two zeros which should be significant. If this number were to be written without scientific notation (3,200,000,000) the significance of those two zeros would be lost and you would - wrongly - say that there were only two significant figures. 7) 2 8) 2 9) 3 10) 3 Rules for Rounding Off Now that "everyone" has a calculator that will give a result to six or eight (or more) figures, it is important that we know how to round the answer off correctly. The typical rule taught is that you round up with five or more and round down with four or less. THIS RULE IS WRONG! However, please do not rush off to your elementary school teacher and read 'em the riot act! The problem lies in rounding "up" (increasing) the number that is followed by a 5. For example, numbers like 3.65 or 3.75, where you are to round off to the nearest tenth. OK, let's see if I can explain this. When you round off, you change the value of the number, except if you round off a zero. Following the old rules, you can round a number down in value four times (rounding with one, two, three, four) compared to rounding it upwards five times (five, six, seven, eight, nine). Remember that "rounding off" a zero does not change the value of the number being rounded off. Suppose you had a very large sample of numbers to round off. On average you would be changing values in the sample downwards 4/9ths of the time, compared to changing values in the sample upward 5/9ths of the time. This means the average of the values AFTER rounding off would be greater than the average of the values BEFORE rounding. This is not acceptable. We can correct for this problem by rounding "off" (keeping the number the same) in fifty percent of the roundings-even numbers followed by a 5. Then, on average, the roundings "off" will cancel out the roundings "up." The following rules dictate the manner in which numbers are to be rounded to the number of figures indicated. The first two rules are more-or-less the old ones. Rule three is the change in the old way. When rounding, examine the figure following (i.e., to the right of) the figure that is to be last. This figure you are examining is the first figure to be dropped. 1. If it is less than 5, drop it and all the figures to the right of it. 2. If it is more than 5, increase by 1 the number to be rounded, that is, the preceeding figure. 3. If it is 5, round the number so that it will be even. Keep in mind that zero is considered to be even when rounding off. Example #1 - Suppose you wish to round 62.5347 to four significant figures. Look at the fifth figure. It is a 4, a number less than 5. Therefore, you will simply drop every figure after the fourth, and the original number rounds off to 62.53. Example #2 - Round 3.78721 to three significant figures. Look at the fourth figure. It is 7, a number greater than 5, so you round the original number up to 3.79. Example #3 - Round 726.835 to five significant figures. Look at the sixth figure. It is a 5, so now you must look at the fifth figure also. That is a 3, which is an odd number, so you round the original number up to 726.84. Example #4 - Round 24.8514 to three significant figures. Look at the fourth figure. It is a 5, so now you must also look at the third figure. It is 8, an even number, so you simply drop the 5 and the figures that follow it. The original number becomes 24.8. When the value you intend to round off is a five, you MUST look at the previous value ALSO. If it is even, you round down. If it is odd, you round up. A common question is "Is zero considered odd or even?" The answer is even. Here are some more examples of the "five rule." Round off at the five. 3.075 3.85 22.73541 0.00565 2.0495 This last one is tricky (at least for high schoolers being exposed to this stuff for the first time!). The nine rounds off to a ten (not a zero), so the correct answer is 2.050, NOT 2.05. Would your teacher be so mean as to include problems like this one on a test? In the Chemists classroom, the sufferers (oops, I mean students) have learned to shout "YES" in unison to such easy questions. Lastly, before we get to the problems. Students, when they learn this rule, like to apply it across the board. For example, in 2.0495, let's say we want to round off to the nearest 0.01. Many times, a student will answer 2.04. When asked to explain, the rule concerning five will be cited. However, the important number in this problem is the nine, so the rule is to round up and the correct answer is 2.05. Practice Problems Round the following numbers as indicated. To four figures: To the nearest 0.1: the nearest whole number: 1) 2.16347 x 105 13) 3.64 56.912 2) 4.000574 x 106 14) 4.55 3.4125 3) 3.682417 15) 7.250 251.7817 4) 7.2518 16) 0.0865 112.511 5) 375.6523 17) 0.5182 63.541 6) 21.860051 18) 2.473 7.555 To two figures: To one decimal place: Round off the farthest right digit 7) 3.512 19) 54.7421 2.473 8) 25.631 20) 100.0925 5.396 9) 40.523 21) 1.3511 8.235 10) 2.751 x 108 22) 79.2588 3.05 11) 3.9814 x 105 23) 0.9114 8.25 12) 22.494 24) 0.2056 8.65 To nearest 0.01: To 25) 6.675 37) 26) 0.4203 38) 27) 0.03062 39) 28) 4.500 40) 29) 2.473 41) 30) 7.555 42) To the nearest 0.001: 31) 5.687524 43) 32) 39.861214 44) 33) 104.97055 45) 34) 41.86632 46) 35) 0.03765 47) 36) 0.0045 48) To nearest 0.01: To 25) 6.68 37) 26) 0.42 38) 27) 0.03 39) 28) 4.50 40) 29) 2.47 41) 30) 7.56 42) These are the answers. Round the following numbers as indicated. To four figures: To the nearest 0.1: the nearest whole number: 1) 2.163 x 105 13) 3.6 57 2) 4.000 x 106 14) 4.6 3 3) 3.682 15) 7.2 252 4) 7.252 16) 0.1 112 5) 375.6 17) 0.5 64 6) 21.86 18) 2.5 8 To two figures: To one decimal place: Round off the farthest right digit 7) 3.5 19) 54.7 2.47 8) 26 20) 100.1 5.40 To the nearest 0.001: 31) 5.688 43) 32) 39.861 44) 9) 40 8.24 10) 2.8 x 108 3.0 11) 4.0 x 105 8.2 12) 22 8.6 21) 1.4 33) 104.970 45) 22) 79.2 34) 41.866 46) 23) 0.9 35) 0.038 47) 24) 0.2 36) 0.004 48) Math With Significant Figures Addition and Subtraction In mathematical operations involving significant figures, the answer is reported in such a way that it reflects the reliability of the least precise operation. Let's state that another way: a chain is no stronger than its weakest link. An answer is no more precise that the least precise number used to get the answer. Let's do it one more time: imagine a team race where you and your team must finish together. Who dictates the speed of the team? Of course, the slowest member of the team. Your answer cannot be MORE precise than the least precise measurement. For addition and subtraction, look at the decimal portion (i.e., to the right of the decimal point) of the numbers ONLY. Here is what to do: 1) Count the number of significant figures in the decimal portion of each number in the problem. (The digits to the left of the decimal place are not used to determine the number of decimal places in the final answer.) 2) Add or subtract in the normal fashion. 3) Round the answer to the LEAST number of places in the decimal portion of any number in the problem. WARNING: the rules for add/subtract are different from multiply/divide. A very common student error is to swap the two sets of rules. Another common error is to use just one rule for both types of operations. Practice Problems 1) 3.461728 + 14.91 + 0.980001 + 5.2631 2) 23.1 + 4.77 + 125.39 + 3.581 3) 22.101 - 0.9307 4) 0.04216 - 0.0004134 5) 564,321 - 264,321 Remember to check the decimal portions of each number in the problem. For example, in the second problem, the 23.1 will dictate the significant figures in the decimal portion of the answer. In other words, NO MATTER how many significant figures there are in the whole number part (to the left of the decimal place), the answer to problem number 2 will extend only into the tenth place. 1) 3.461728 + 14.91 + 0.980001 + 5.2631 2) 23.1 + 4.77 + 125.39 + 3.581 In each of these two problems, examine the decimal portion only. Find the number with the LEAST number of digits in the decimal portion. In problem 1 it is the 14.91 and in problem 2 it is 23.1. That means problem 1 will have its answer rounded to the 0.01 place and problem 2 will have its answer rounded to the 0.1 place. The correct answers are 24.61 and 156.8. 3) 22.101 - 0.9307 The answer is 21.170. The first value in the problem, with three significant places to the right of the decimal point, dictates how many significant places to the right of the decimal point in the answer. 4) 0.04216 - 0.0004134 The answer is 0.04175. 5) 564,321 - 264,321 This problem is somewhat artifical. The correct answer is 300,000, BUT all of the significant figures are retained. The most correct way to write the answer would be 3.00000 x 105. Sorry 'bout that! Math With Significant Figures Multiplication and Division In mathematical operations involving significant figures, the answer is reported in such a way that it reflects the reliability of the least precise operation. Let's state that another way: a chain is no stronger than its weakest link. An answer is no more precise that the least precise number used to get the answer. Let's do it one more time: imagine a team race where you and your team must finish together. Who dictates the speed of the team? Of course, the slowest member of the team. Your answer cannot be MORE precise than the least precise measurement. The following rule applies for multiplication and division: The LEAST number of significant figures in any number of the problem determines the number of significant figures in the answer. This means you MUST know how to recognize significant figures in order to use this rule. Example #1: 2.5 x 3.42. The answer to this problem would be 8.6 (which was rounded from the calculator reading of 8.55). Why? 2.5 has two significant figures while 3.42 has three. Two significant figures is less precise than three, so the answer has two significant figures. Example #2: How many significant figures will the answer to 3.10 x 4.520 have? You may have said two. This is too few. A common error is for the student to look at a number like 3.10 and think it has two significant figures. The zero in the hundedth's place is not recognized as significant when, in fact, it is. 3.10 has three significant figures. Three is the correct answer. 14.0 has three significant figures. Note that the zero in the tenth's place is considered significant. All trailing zeros in the decimal portion are considered significant. Another common error is for the student to think that 14 and 14.0 are the same thing. THEY ARE NOT. 14.0 is ten times more precise than 14. The two numbers have the same value, but they convey different meanings about how trustworthy they are. Four is also an incorrect answer given by some Chemists students. It is too many significant figures. One possible reason for this answer lies in the number 4.520. This number has four significant figures while 3.10 has three. Somehow, the student (YOU!) maybe got the idea that it is the GREATEST number of significant figures in the problem that dictates the answer. It is the LEAST. Sometimes student will answer this with five. Most likely you responded with this answer because it says 14.012 on your calculator. This answer would have been correct in your math class because mathematics does not have the significant figure concept. Example #3: 2.33 x 6.085 x 2.1. How many significant figures in the answer? Answer - two. Which number decides this? Answer - the 2.1. Why? It has the least number of significant figures in the problem. It is, therefore, the least precise measurement. Example #4: (4.52 x 10¯4) ÷ (3.980 x 10¯6). How many significant figures in the answer? Answer - three. Which number decides this? Answer - the 4.52 x 10¯4. Why? It has the least number of significant figures in the problem. It is, therefore, the least precise measurement. Notice it is the 4.52 portion that plays the role of determining significant figures; the exponential portion plays no role. Practice Problems Solve these, then click the link for answers and discussion. 1) (3.4617 x 107) ÷ (5.61 x 10¯4) 2) [(9.714 x 105) (2.1482 x 10¯9)] ÷ [(4.1212) (3.7792 x 10¯5)]. Watch your order of operations on this problem. 3) (4.7620 x 10¯15) ÷ [(3.8529 x 1012) (2.813 x 10¯7) (9.50)] 4) [(561.0) (34,908) (23.0)] ÷ [(21.888) (75.2) (120.00)] Answers to problems. A Brief Aside There might come an occasion in chemistry when you are not exactly sure how many significant figures are called for. Suppose the textbook mentions 100 mL. You look at this and see only one significant figure. However, an experienced chemist would know that 100 mL can be easily measured to 3 or 4 significant figures. Why then doesn't the textbook (or the professor) write 100.0 (for 4 sig figs) or 1.00 x 102 (for 3 sig figs)? The textbook writer or the professor might be assuming that all in his or her audience understands these matters and so it is no big deal to simply write 100. Or they are lazy. So, a brief word of advice. If you haven't a clue as to how many significant figures to use, try using three or four. These are reasonable numbers of significant figures for most chemical activities. Also, look out for the instructor who ignores significant figures in lecture, then makes a big deal of it on a test. Forewarned is forearmed! Calculators and Significant Figures It seems that most high school students treat the numbers on their calculator screen as Holy Writ. NO, IT IS NOT. Most of the string of numbers on the screen does not belong in your final answer. These two problems are intended to illustrate the difficulty surrounding calculators and significant figures. 1) Calculate the area in cm2 of these two samples: length (cm) width (cm) area (cm2) a. b. 27.81 27.93 20.49 20.36 569.8269 568.6547 2) Calculate the volume in cm3 of the samples from the given thickness: a. b. thickness (cm) volume (cm3) 0.710 404.57709 0.690 392.37181 Solution - ROUND OFF!