Download Ch5 f

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Interest: money for rent
"If you believe in things you don't understand, YOU SUFFER." Stevie Wonder
$ in the U.S.A.
In 1690, the Massachusetts Bay Colony issued the first paper money in the colonies. In
1796, The Mint, who once considered producing doughnut-shaped coins, settled on the a
solid $2.50 gold piece that was to become the standard U.S. coin until the middle 1800’s.
But, by the end of the Civil War, nearly 40 % of all U.S. paper currency in circulation
was counterfeit. As a result, in 1865, the Secret Service was created under the U.S.
Treasury Department and in less than a decade, counterfeiting was sharply reduced.
During that decade, the U.S. Treasury created the two-cent coin, the significance here is it
was that coin that was the first to bear the motto "In God We Trust". Since 1877, all
U.S. currency has been printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which began as
a six person operation in a dark basement of the Department of Treasury. Now, 2,300
Bureau employees work in a twenty-five acre floor space spanning two buildings, where
38 million notes are printed each work day with a face value of approximately $541
million and that comes to eight billion U.S. notes each year, enough to wrap around the
equator 30 times. These notes are tough, you could double-fold a U.S. currency note
about 4,000 times before it would tear. Almost half of these notes printed are $1 notes.
Source: US Federal Reserve and the United States Mint.
Similarly for coins, over half of the coins produced in the U.S. are pennies. The
composition of the one cent penny has undergone change upon change in the last 211
years. It was pure copper from 1793 to 1837. Then it was bronze, then copper and
nickel, then bronze again, and today it is 97 ½ % copper, 2 ½ % zinc. The actual number
of coins produced yearly in this country is roughly, by denomination, 10 billion pennies,
1.3 billion nickels, 2.3 billion dimes, nearly 2 billion quarters, and 30 million half-dollars.
Who’s on this money, aside from an assortment of presidents? Four women have been
portrayed on US coins, but Martha Washington is the only woman whose portrait ever
appeared on U.S. paper money. While no portraits of African Americans have ever
appeared on paper money, commemorative coins were issued bearing the images of
George Washington Carver, Booker T. Washington and Jackie Robinson. Paper money
did bear the signatures of four African American men who served as Registers of the
Treasury and one African American woman who served as Treasurer of the United
States. And it is Abraham Lincoln on the penny as the only U.S. president to face to the
right, all the other portraits of presidents on U.S. circulating coins face to the left. The
reason is less grandiose that one would think. President Lincoln is facing to the right
because his likeness on the penny is simply an adaptation of a plaque bearing his
resemblance. Source: http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0774850.html
Why do we use the symbol of an “S” with a vertical line slashed through it? Many
people wonder where the symbol of the dollar sign evolved from, and the answer, though
mildly controversial, is the peso. Though adopted by the United States dollar in 1785, the
symbol “$” was widely used before that year. From dusting off old manuscripts, one can
actually see the Mexican or Spanish "P's" for pesos replaced by an “S” written over the
“P”. This "S" gradually evolved as it was written over the "P" into the dollar sign
symbol “$” we are all now familiar with.
How important is finance in the media? In the 60 days following President Clinton's
State of the Union address, the New York Times ran 27 stories regaling the President's
campaign finance misfortunes and 3 stories regarding education reform, the showpiece of
his acceptance speech. How important is money in this culture we live? They say the
most common gift in the U.S.A. for a newborn is the savings bond. If you think this
through, the choice of a savings bond is the perfect gift for the baby, one size fits all, and
it grows with the child. When the child becomes school age, if the dog eats their
homework, they are out of luck, but if the dog eats their savings bond, it can be replaced.
(And by the way, if you had done so in July of 1976, you could have purchased as $ 25
Savings Bond for $ 17.76 instead of the usual price of $ 18.75 thanks to the bank’s
celebration of the Bicentennial.) Finally, how important is money on this planet? The
number of wars fought between countries that each had at least one McDonald's franchise
is zero.
Effective rates, Simple Interest, Compound Interest
All of us see advertisements everyday where a company wants you to purchase their
product with credit. They want to give you merchandise even though at this time you
simply do not have all the cash. Financing is available.
Interest or ’rent on money’ can be understood and calculated by incorporating some
fundamental ideas of mathematics. One of the first observations we need to make is the
connection between interest theory and the power of mathematics to succinctly capture
numerical patterns. When studying interest we will see rigorously structured patterns and
then use the familiar linear and exponential growth models to continue our journey in
recognizing mathematics embedded through out our lives.
Most often we think of interest in the form of a financial transaction but this is not always
the case. Interest can be in the form of goods or services as well. For example, an artist
or craftsman may produce a piece of work and give it to the owner of a studio or
workshop in lieu of actual cash payments for shop privileges. Our presentation of the
mathematics involved with the theory of interest will focus specifically on monies paid as
rent for money borrowed.
While turning the pages of any news paper you will see advertisements from businesses
that either want to loan you money, ‘Consolidate all your debt into one low monthly
payment: interest only 3.125%/3.32% APR - 30 year fixed 5.375%/5.563% APR’ or want
you to invest your money with them ’11.18% Investment opportunity, 3 months 8.32% 6 months 10.51% - 12 months 11.18% minimum investment of $1000 and all rates are
annual yield’ What is APR? and why the fine print?
Lets start our analysis with two interest paying concepts. The first is called an effective
rate of interest and the second in called a nominal rate of interest. The effective rate of
interest is the actual rate at which interest is paid on principal, P (the money originally
invested). We can observe the effective rate using the ratio I/P. Interest payments by
themselves are calculated by taking the product of principal the interest rate and the
amount of time, I  Pr t . The idea of simple interest follows a linear growth pattern.
That is, the original principal is enhanced with interest payments on regular intervals of
time and the same amount of interest is added to the principal following each interest
period. Algebraically, we see this new quantity as principal plus interest, P  I . Under
the simple interest scenario we add the same fixed amount of interest to an account at the
end of each interest period. The value of the accounts grow according to the following
pattern: P  I , P  2 I , P  3I , P  4 I and so on until reaching the end of the n th interest
period and the final account balance will be P  nI . Lets build our first numerical
example on this topic.
Problem One
Under the rules of simple interest how much will an initial principal of $100.00 grow
over a period of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years at 3% simple interest paid annually? We have
P  100 , r  .03 and t  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 . The amount of interest paid at the end
of each successive year is I  Pr t  100.00  .03 1  3.00 . The account value at the end
of each year increases by the same fixed amount; 100.00 1 3.00  103.00 ,
100.00  2  3.00  106.00 , 100.00  3 3.00  109.00 , 100.00  4  3.00  112.00 ,
100.00  5  3.00  115.00 and 100.00 10  3.00  130.00 .
We need to notice two very important things here. First, the structure of each equation is
that of a linear model, y  mx  b . Our original principal is our starting value identified
with b , the amount of interest paid each year is our constant rate of change m , time in
increments of years occupy the independent variable x and finally the end of the year
value of the account is represented by the dependent variable y . Second, we need to
examine the effective rate over time. Our technique of identifying percent changes is of
new  old
value here. Recall, the percent change formula structure is
. How much
old
interest with respect to the amount of money found in our account was actually paid at
the end of each year in our first example?
103  100
3
106  103
3

 .03 or 3% the first year,

 .02913 or 2.913% the
100
100
103
103
109  106
3
112  109
3

 .0283 or 2.83% the third year,

 .02752
second year,
106
106
109
109
115  112
3

 .02679 or 2.679% the fifth year and
or 2.752% the fourth year,
100
112
130  127
3

 .02362 or 2.362% the tenth year. The effective rate of interest being
127
127
paid is decreasing. The amount of interest being paid remained constant while the
amount of money in our account grew creating the situation where we have a decreasing
effective rate. Simple interest provides for a decreasing effective rate.
In ordinary English, we may say since we are accumulating 3 dollars interest per year, the
3 dollars when compared to $ 100, $ 103, $ 106 and so on is a smaller percentage of each
amount found in the account each year. Does this seem fair to you? The bank, which
may house the money seems to be getting more money each year, but the interest, though
constant, in turn is a smaller percentage of that amount as time progresses. Our effective
rate ratio I/P shrinks each time interest is paid.
What needs to change in this scenario so that the effective rate does not decrease but
remains constant? If you are thinking that interest needs to be paid on previous interest
payments into the account you are correct. Situations where interest is paid on previous
interest added to the account fall in the area of compound interest. Interest paid on
interest earned is the compounding of interest. In our next example we will use the same
numbers for our original principal and interest but will employ the use of an exponential
growth model to complete the calculations.
Problem Two
Again, starting with the basic concept of interest we can develop an algebraic expression
to use when calculating the future value of our account. The exponential model naturally
presents itself when we start to analyze this situation. At the completion of the first
1
interest period our account balance has grown from P to P  Pr t  P1  rt  . Because
the time intervals remain constant t  1 year we do not need to keep track of the variable
t as we let t  1 and our expression becomes P1  r  . We will need to keep count of
the number of times interest is paid and we will use the variable n for the number of
compounding periods. At the end of the second interest period our balance becomes
1
P1  r   P1  r   r   P1  r  1  r 
 P1  r  . The expression used to find the
account balance at the end of the third interest period is
2
2
2
1
3
P1  r   P1  r   r  P1  r  1  r   P1  r  . Is the pattern obvious? The n th
1
1

1
1
2

interest payment will produce a balance of P 1  r  dollars. The structure of this
formula is identical to our exponential growth formula a  b x . The original principal P is
our starting value a and 1  r  is our growth rate b . Incorporating the same numerical
values as used in the previous example the year to year account values under the
1
2
compound interest scenario are 1001  .03  1  103.00 , 1001  .03  1  106.09 ,
n
1001  .03  1  109.27 , 1001  .03  1  112.55 , 1001  .03  1  115.92 , and
3
4
5
1001  .03  1  134.39 . Examining the effective rate we see the effective rate remains
new  old
103  100
3
106.09  103 3.09


 .03 , second year

 .03 ,
constant.
old
100
100
103
103
109.27  106.09
3.18

 .02997 , fourth year
third year
106.09
106.09
112.55  109.27
3.28
115.92  112.55
3.37

 .03001 , fifth year

 .02994 and
109.27
109.27
112.55
112.55
134.39  130.48
3.91

 .02996 . The effective
the effective rte for the tenth year is
130.48
130.48
rate of interest paid remains constant through out the life of this account. Why, in this
example does the approximate effective rate bounce around the .03 value?
10
Compound interest provides for a constant effective rate and recall, simple interest
provided for a decreasing effective rate. With compound interest, not only is the money
found in the bank increasing, the amount of interest paid is increasing and the interest
accumulated seems to be a constant percentage of the current account value. This is
strikingly different from simple interest, where the interest is constant for each successive
year, but it is a smaller percentage of the amount found in the account. So, if you are
investing money and the effective rate is simply a measure of the ratio of interest to the
money found in the bank, which investing method would you prefer, simple or
compound?
In general, we have two distinct methods of accumulating interest. Either by the simple
interest process or the compound interest process and there are some occurrences where
both scenarios are combined to analyze the growth of interest. Simple interest
incorporates a linear growth model and has the characteristic of producing a decreasing
new  old  P  nI    P  (n  1) I  P  nI  P  nI  I
I
effective rate,
.



old
P  (n  1) I
P  (n  1) I
P  (n  1) I
As we can see, the percent change formula when applied to the simple interest situation
simplifies to a ratio where the denominator will continue to numerically grow with each
passing interest payment period. The growth of the denominator and the existence of no
change in the numerator of this ratio is what mathematically forces a decreasing effective
rate.
Now, when we look at the effective rate of interest produced by the compound interest
model we see there is a constant effective rate of interest
n
n 1
n 1


new  old  P 1  r   P 1  r   P 1  r  1  r  1 


 r . Each compounding
n 1
n 1
old
P 1  r 
P 1  r 
period has the same interest rate applied to the value of the account. The account grows
proportionally at the end of each compounding period.
Example Three
We need a future value of $ 5000 in three years, and can earn 6 ½ % compound interest
annually, what must be our present value (or original principle).
Solution
We know, Future Value  Principal 1  i  so, Principal 
n
Future Value
1  i n
.
5000
 3, 649.40 dollars. We have earned $ 5000 – $
(1  0.065)5
3649.40 = $1,350.60 as rent on our original principal.
Principle or Present Value =
Problem Four
Suppose you invest $ 5,000 at 6 ½ % simple interest for 10 years. a) How much is found
in the account after 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10 years? b) Find the effective rate of interest for year
1, 2, 3 and 10. c) How much interest is found in the account after 10 years?
Solution:
a) This investment is based on simple interest, and this formula has a linear structure of
A  P  nI , where I  Pr t . Let P = 5000, r = 0.065 and t = 1, then
I  5000(0.065)1  325 .
At the end of year 1, we have 5000 + (1)325 = 5325
At the end of year 2, we have 5000 + (2)325 = 5650
At the end of year 3, we have 5000 + (3)325 = 5975
Continuing with this process, we have
At the end of year 9, we have 5000 + (9)325 = 7925
At the end of year 10, we have 5000 + (10)325 = 8250
new  old
. Let’s examine this ratio for years
old
new  old 5325  5000

 325/ 5000  0.065
1, 2, 3, 9, and 10. For year 1,
old
5000
b) The effective rate is found by looking at
new  old 5650  5325

 325/ 5325  0.061 . Continuing, for year 3,
old
5325
new  old
new  old
 325/ 5650  0.058 . For year 9,
 325/ 5975  0.054
old
old
And for year 10, the effective rates appear to continue this trend of plummeting fast, and
new  old
 325/ 7925  0.041 c) The amount of interest after 10 years is 10($
we have
old
325) = $ 3250
For year 2,
Let’s compare this investment based on simple interest with an investment based on
compound interest. We will use the same numbers as we did in Examples 3 and 4, so our
comparison is easy to visualize.
Problem Five
Suppose you invest $5,000 at 6 ½ % compound interest for 10 years. a) How much is
found in the account after 1, 2, 3, 9 and 10 years? b) Find the effective rate of interest
for year 10. c) How much interest is found in the account after 10 years?
Solution
a) This investment is based on compound interest, so now we have A  P(1  r )n , which
has the exponential structure “ ab x ”. Let P = 5000, r = 0.065 and n = 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10.
End of year 1, we have A  5000(1  0.065)1  5325 which matches identically with the
simple interest calculation.
End of year 2, we have A  5000(1  0.065)2 = $ 5,671.13 which is more than the $ 5,650
we had in simple interest.
End of year 3, we have A  5000(1  0.065)3 = $ 6,039.75 which, again, is more than we
had with simple interest, where we had $ 5,975.
End of year 9, we have A  5000(1  0.065)9 = $ 8812.85 as compared to the $ 7925
accumulated from the simple interest investment.
End of year 10, we have A  5000(1  0.065)10 = $ 9385.69 as compared to the $ 8250
accumulated from the simple interest investment.
new  old
b) Again, the effective rate is found by looking at
. Let’s examine this ratio
old
for year 10.
10
9
9
1
50001.065  50001.065
50001.065 1.065  1
new  old


 0.065
9
9
old
50001.065
50001.065

 


which is 6.5 % so it appears the effective rate stays constant, as we would predict.
c) The interest found in the account after 10 years is $9385.69 - $5,000 = $4,385.69
which is considerably more than the interest of $3,250 that was derived from a simple
interest bearing account for the same number of years, with the same amount of principle.
And this was an investment that was compounded annually, once a year.
Problem Six
The graph below shows two different accounts each with an investment of $100 for 5
years. The horizontal axis represents time measured in years, the vertical axis represents
the dollar amount an investment accumulates to after so much time has past. In one
account, the $100 is compounded quarterly at 12 % annually, and in the other account,
the $100 is compounded quarterly at 9 % annually. Based on this information and the
graph below, which statement is the most reasonable?
a)
If both accounts continue for 20 years, the 9 % graph would eventually get closer to
the 12 % graph.
b)
There is no literal difference in the amount in both accounts until after the first year.
c)
A small increase in the interest rate makes a substantial difference after 5 years.
d)
The difference between the two graphs is constant from year to year.
a)
b)
c)
d)
Solution
Let’s explore the reasonableness of each of the choices separately.
If both accounts continue for 20 years, the 9 % graph would eventually get closer to
the 12 % graph. This does not seem reasonable. Every indiaction is that the difference
between the curves should increase as times passes.
There is no literal difference in the amount in both accounts until after the first year.
This again does not seem reasonable. Since there is a difference between the graphs in
the interval 0 < t < 1, and since the money is compounded quarterly, then there should be
a difference in the accounts as early as after the first 3 months (1st quarter).
A small increase in the interest rate makes a substantial difference after 5 years. This
appears quite reasonable. From the graph, there appears to be nearly a $25 difference in
the accounts after 5 year, $180 versus $ 155. Since the investment was $100, this is 25 %
percent of the original investment, which is substantial.
The difference between the two graphs is constant from year to year. Let’s analyze
the graph. Approximating from the graph, after 1 year there seems to a $5 difference.
After two years, there seems to be a little more than $5 difference, but after 5 years, the
difference is nearly $25. It is not reasonable to assume the rate of change is constant.
Exercise Set:
1. Suppose you invest $ 40,000 at 5 ½%
simple interest for 10 years. a) Find the
effective rate of interest for year 1, 2, 3
and 10. b) How much is found in the
account after 10 years? c) How much
interest is found in the account after 10
years?
2. Suppose you invest $ 5,000 at 6 ½ %
compound interest compounded
annually for 10 years. a) Find the
effective rate of interest for year 1, 2, 3
and 10. b) How much is found in the
account after 10 years? c) How much
interest is found in the account after 10
years?
3. Suppose you invest a quarter of a
million dollars at 12 % simple interest
for 10 years. a) Find the effective rate
of interest for year 1, 2, 3 and 10. b)
How much is found in the account after
10 years? c) After 10 years, how much
interest was paid to the account?
4. Suppose you invest quarter of a
million dollars at 12 % compound
interest compounded annually for 10
years. a) Find the effective rate of
interest for year 1, 2, 3 and 10. b) How
much is found in the account after 10
years? c) After 10 years, how much
interest was paid to the account?
7. $500 invested at simple interest at
10% or $500 at compound interest at
9.9% annually.
8. $500 invested at simple interest at
10% or $510 at simple interest at 9.9%.
9. $500 invested at simple interest at
10% or $490 at compound interest at
9.95% annually.
10. Compare the two investment
options, $2000 at 11 ½ % compounded
annually or $2250 at 11.25%
compounded daily. For which
investment is the effective rate larger,
after a) 1 year b) 2 years c) 3 years
d) 5 years e) 10 years f) 25 years
11. Over a twenty year period how
much would you have to invest today to
obtain a million dollars in an account
a) at 10 ½ % simple interest.
b) 10 ½ % annual compound interest.
c) at 18 % annual compound interest.
12. The graphs below show the results
of investing $100 per month into
accounts
For problems 5 to 9, for which
investment is the effective rate is larger
after the 5th year.
5. $500 invested at simple interest at
10% or $ 480 at simple interest at 10%.
6. $5,000 invested at simple interest at
10% or $480 at simple interest at 10%.
One account is compounded monthly @
6.25 % and the other account is
compounded quarterly @ 9.25 %.
Despite compounding more often, the
monthly account lies beneath the
account that compounds money
quarterly.
Based on this information, which
statement below is true.
a) There is no difference in the return
of the two accounts until after the 2nd
year.
b) The higher the interest rate will
always yield a greater return
regardless of the compounding
periods.
c) The longer the money sits in the two
accounts, the greater the difference
in return for the account that pays
9.25 %.
d) There is no significant difference in
return in the two accounts after
25 years.
Compound Interest
A question is knocking loudly on our door. For the investment from Problem Five,
would the interest have been greater for this investment if the principle was compounded
more frequently than once a year? How about if the interest rate was raised and the
compounding periods stayed the same? How about if the compounding periods were
more often, but the rate was lowered? Or if the compounding periods were less frequent,
but the rate was raised?
Let’s begin answering these questions by observing an investment based on compound
interest, where the compounding is not done once a year (annually). We will use $100 at
3 % annual compounded daily for a year. The first natural question is do we do we
compound the money 3 % each and every day? Well, if this were true, after one year, we
would have 100(1  0.03)365  $ 4,848272.45 . Cool huh. Got a $ 100? Run to the bank –
go do this… .
Oh, wait a minute, let’s think this through a little more carefully, if we compound 3 %
every day for 365 days, then that is 365 times you compound the money in a year at 3 %.
Loosely, this means the 3 percent is not an annual percentage anymore. Let’s not run to
the bank quite yet. We need to increment the 3 percent over the 365 days. Simply put,
we apply 1/365th of the 3 percent each day. Our formula will need to account for this
incrementing process. This process of dividing the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) by the
number of times you compound per year is referred to as the nominal rate. The nominal
rate for this problem is 0.03/365 or 0.000082 each day. After one year, we would have
365
 0.03 
100 1 
  $103.05 . This makes more sense. Now, go run to the bank. Or walk.
365 

The sense of urgency seems to have dissipated greatly.
For compound interest, we use the formula, A  P 1  i  , where P is the principal, ‘i’ is
the nominal rate or the interest rate per compounding period, and N is the number of
interest conversion periods over the life of the investment. Notice in our last
investment, we were not given ‘i’ and N out right, we had to calculate these values.
N
nt
N
 r
So, we augment our compound interest formula to look like A  P 1  i   P 1   ,
 n
where P is the principal, ‘i’ is replaced with ‘r/n’, where r is the annual interest rate and n
the number of times compounding occurs each year. Also, observe that N is replaced
with the product n  t  where t is the time, in years and n is the number of interest
payment periods. Now, when the interest accruing portion of the formula is raised to the
n t power, it is raised to the number of times the account is compounded or paid interest
over the life of the investment.
Compounding Periods
If we compound monthly, n = 12, meaning we will have 12 interest compounding
periods per year and if the interest rate is 6 % annual, we find the nominal rate by taking
1/12 th of 6 % or 0.5 % and apply this rate to each compounding period. Continuing this
thought process to correctly construct the nominal rates, if we are compounding
quarterly, n = 4, we would divide the APR by 4, if we compounded daily, n = 365, we
divide the APR by 365. There are some businesses which operate on the terms of a
Banker’s year and this requires one to follow the rule of 360 days in each year with each
of the 12 months having 30 days. So, under the banker’s rule nominal rates involving
daily interest conversion periods requires using a value of n = 360.
A Partial Period
Not all financial situations begin and end on pristine timeframes suitable for our
N
compound interest formula P 1  i  . What happens when an account is quietly growing
at a comfortable rate and then needs to be interrupted at some point in the middle of an
interest conversion period? For example, say our account is compounded quarterly and
all the money needs to be withdrawn on a day in the middle of the quarter. What is best
for the investor? When we mathematically model the growth of monies in a compound
N
interest accruing account we do so with an exponential model, a  b x or P 1  i  . If we
were to look at a graph representing the growth of money in our account over time we
describe the rate of change as increasing at an increasing rate. The fact our account is
increasing at an increasing rate tells us the curve representing this growth is concave up.
Now if we were to pick any two points along this curve and then connect those points
with a line, the line would be above the curve over the entire interval between the points
selected.
Thus, if we use our compound interest formula to calculate the growth over the first k
whole interest conversion periods and then use our linear growth rate model for the last
partial period we will have calculated the investment growth in favor of the investor.
This can be seen in the graph above. Recall the vertical axis represents money
accumulated in the account and simply put the line is above the graph of the exponential
model thus, representing more interest growth over this partial period time frame. Our
k
Future Value of the account is now arrived at using the formula FV  P1  i  1  it 
where t represents the partial increment of time where the last interest conversion period
was interrupted.
Consider the following scenario. We invest $1,000,000.00 into an account where interest
is convertible monthly. Lets assume the APR for the account is 6%. This provides for a
nominal rate of .06 / 12  .005 and for each complete interest conversion period the
account balance would grow by a factor of 1.005 . Say, the money is left to accrue
interest for one year. The account balance at the end of the year would be
12
$1,000,0001.005  $1,061,677.81 . Now suppose the money was left in the account for
an additional 21 days. Because the account is set up to pay interest on monthly intervals
we will use a combination of both the linear and exponential formulas to determine the
account balance. Notice we will use the same nominal rate and we will assume there are
30 days in this month. We have the following
21 
12 
$1,000,0001.005 1  .005    $1,065,393.68 . Compared to simply adjusting the
30 

30  $1,065,390.90 the technique
exponent in our P 1  i  model; $1,000,0001.005
of including a single linear growth factor pays the investor more money, $2.78 more.
Similarly, if an account received interest payments on a convertible quarterly basis and
N
12 21
the investment time falls in the middle of a quarter the increment of time used for the
linear growth factor may be approximated using the banker’s rule. Your ratio of time
under the quarterly scenario should incorporate a denominator of 90 days and the
numerator will be the actual number of days. So, 21 days into the quarter our time
variable would look like 21 90 .
Exercise Set
1. How much would you have to invest
today to obtain 25,000 dollars in the
bank in 5 ½ years at 6 7/8 % annual
compound interest.
2. How much would you have to invest
today to get a 1000 dollars in the bank in
8 months at 12% annual compound
interest.
3. It is March 3rd , 2004. You want
$6,000 on April 4th, 2006. How much
would you have to invest on 3/3/04 in an
account yielding a) 8 % simple interest.
b) 7 ¾ % annual compound interest.
4. It is March 3rd , 2004. You deposit
$16,000. How much would you have on
April 4th, 2006 if you invested in an
account yielding a) 8 % simple interest.
b) 7 ¾ % annual compound interest.
5. It is January 1st, 2004. You deposit
$1,000. How much would you have on
April 4th, 2006 if you invested in an
account yielding a) 8 ½ % annual
compound interest. b) 5 % annual
compound interest.
6. What is the difference between an
effective rate for simple interest
investments compared to compound
interest investments?
7. If you have a choice of investing
$10,000 into two accounts. How long
would you have to have the money in the
bank for it to be worth it if you choose
an account that yields 11.10%
compounded annually over one that
yields 11 ¼ % simple interest.
8. You invest $100 into an account
yielding 6 ¾ % simple interest for 2
years 5 months. You then invest the
accumulated total into a new account
yielding 6 % compounded annually for 1
year 7 months. How much money is in
the new account after those 4 years?
9. You invest $100 into an account
yielding 5 ½ % simple interest for 5
years 2 months. You then invest only
the accumulated interest into a new
account yielding 6% compounded
annually for 1 year 10 months, you leave
the original principal in the other
account. How much money do you have
total in both accounts after those 7
years?
10. You invest $100 into an account
yielding 11 % simple interest for 10
years. You withdraw the money and
reinvest it all into an account that yields
12 % simple interest for another 10
years. How much interest did you earn
on that original investment of $100?
11. You borrow $7,500 for 2 years 9
months simple interest. You pay back
$9,000. Find the interest rate.
Annual Yield
Let’s compare two investments, one with an annual percentage rate of 7 ¼ %
compounded quarterly, the other with an annual percentage rate of 7 1/8 % compounded
daily; which would be the better choice if we were to invest? One has a higher rate, the
other compounds more frequently. The Annual Yield is the simple interest equivalent to
the compounded interest rate. It is sometimes referred to as the Annual Percentage
Yield, or APY. The APY allows us to compare different rates with differing
compounding periods. It allows the consumer or investor to fairly differentiate between
different investments strategies. How does a person decide which credit card to choose
or which loan to secure? And if one must compare exactly such as the question we posed
initially, where the choice is between two investments, where the investment with the
higher rate is also the investment that compounds less frequently, we search for the APY.
To find the annual yield, we revert the compound interest to its equivalent simple interest
form. This means we simply set a simple interest investment equal to a compound
n
interest investment, or more precisely, P(1+rt) = P 1  i  . Dividing through by P, and
renaming rt as Y to stand for annual yield, we have:
n
1 + Y = 1  i 
4
 0.0725 
For 7 ¼ % quarterly: 1 + Y = 1 
, therefore we have
4 

4
 0.0725 
Yield  1 
 1  0.0744 .
4 

 0.07125 
For 7 1/8 % daily: 1 + Y = 1 
365 

365
, therefore we have
365
 0.0725 
Yield  1 
 1  0.0738 .
365 

So, the 7 ¼ % annually compounded quarterly will grant a higher annual yield, 7.44 %
APY as compared to the 7.38 % APY, despite compounding less frequently.
For example, a CD (Certificate of Deposit) may provide an annual percentage rate of 3.87
% compounded monthly. You will see the words 3.87 % APR in the verbiage. Next to
these words, you will see the words 3.93 % APY, which means 3.93 % is the equivalent
interest rate when reverted back to simple interest over 1 year. This information is
provided for you because it allows you to compare this CD to another CD with differing
terms.
Problem One
We invest $1000 into an account convertible monthly at 6 percent annual interest. How
much money would we have accumulated after 2 years 5 months? What is the nominal
interest rate? What is the annual yield?
Solution
The principle is $1000, the time is 29 months, which is the number of compounding
periods, dividing the interest rate by 12 months the nominal rate is 0.06/12 = 0.005 or 0.5
percent per month. So, we have
A  P1  i 
nt
N
 r
 .06 
 P1    10001 

 n
 12 
29
 1155.62 dollars.
n
12
 r
 .06 
The annual yield is found by Y  1    1  1 
  1  0.062  6.2% .
 n
 12 
Problem Two
We need $10,000 in 3 years and 3 months. We deposit a sum now into an account that
will compound monthly at 6 percent annual. How much should we deposit today to
obtain a future value of $ 10,000? What is the annual yield?
Solution
The Future Value is $10,000 and again, the nominal rate is 0.06/12 = 0.005 or 0.5
percent. We rewrite our formula inputting these values and have
N
A  P1  i 
nt
39
 r
 .06 
 P1    $10,000  P1 
 and now solving for the variable P
 n
 12 
39
 .06 
we have $10,0001 
  P  $8,232.35 . That is, we will need to invest $8,232.35
 12 
today. The annual yield is exactly the same as calculated in the previous example, why?
Y  6.2% .
Problem Three
Invest $ 3000 at 5 ¼ % annual compounded daily.
a) Find the future value after 13 years and then after 14 years.
b) Divide 5.25 into 72 and compare this number with the results from part a).
c) Determine the Annual Yield.
d) Explicitly state what the Nominal Rate means.
Solution
a) To find the future value after 13 years, we have
nt
N
 r
A  P 1  i   P  1  
 n
 0.0525 
FV  3000 1 

365 

(365)(13)
 $5,936.16
To find the future value after 14 years, we have
nt
N
 r
A  P 1  i   P  1  
 n
 0.0525 
FV  3000 1 

365 

(365)(14)
 $6, 256.11
Notice that somewhere between the 13th year of our investment and the 14th year of our
investment, our investment doubled in value.
b) 72/5.25 = 13.7.
The Rule of 72 tells us if we divide 72 by our annual interest rate, we will know how
long it will take to double our investment at 8 % compounded annually. An account paid
9
8% interest compounded annually will double in value at 9 years, 1  .08  2 . If we
invest in an account with an interest rate below 8 % annual, it will require more than 9
years to double our investment. If we invest into an account with an interest rate above 8
% annual, we will require less than 9 years to double our investment. In our example we
see the account balance doubled sometime between the 13th and 14th year as the rule of 72
predicted.
c) The annual yield may be calculated as follows:
 0.0525 
1 + Y = 1 
365 

5.4 %.
365
4
 0.0525 
 1  0.05389 or about
, therefore we have Yield  1 
4 

d) The nominal rate is a portion of the annual percentage rate applied when calculating
interest to be paid at the end of each interest conversion period.
Exercise Set
1. How much money is required to be
invested today to obtain $2000 in 9
months if your account pays 5 ½ %
compounded quarterly? What is the
nominal interest rate?
2. How much money is required to be
invested today to obtain $20,000 in 4
years 5 months if your account pays
6 3/8 % compounded monthly? What is
the nominal interest rate?
3. How much money will you have in 5
years 2 months if you invest $2000 into
an account that pays 12 ½ %
compounded quarterly? What is the
nominal interest rate?
4. How much money will you have in
20 years if you invest a quarter of a
million dollars into an account that pays
11 ½ % compounded monthly? What is
the nominal interest rate?
5. How much money will you have in 7
years if you invest $ 100 into an account
that pays 4 5/8 % compounded daily?
What is the nominal interest rate?
6. Would you have more money if you
invested $ 1000 into an account that paid
5 1/3 % compounded monthly for 6
years or if you deposited $ 1000 into an
account that paid 5 % compounded daily
for 6 years? Use the Annual Yield for
each account to determine your answer.
7. Would you have more money if you
invested $ 1000 into an account that paid
5 1/3 % compounded monthly for 6
years or if you deposited $ 1000 into an
account that paid 5 % compounded daily
for 6 years?
8. Would you have more money if you
invested $ 1000 into an account that paid
6 % compounded quarterly for 6 years or
if you deposited $ 990 into an account
that paid 5.9 % compounded monthly for
6 years?
9. Would you have more money if you
invested $ 1000 into an account that paid
6 % compounded quarterly for 6 years or
if you deposited $ 1100 into an account
that paid 5.9 % compounded quarterly
for 6 years?
10. Compare the annual yield of two
investments, one at 1.49 % compounded
daily to 1.54 compounded monthly.
Hint: You may want to take the
calculation to the thousandths place to
accurately make the comparison.
11. Compare the annual yield of two
investments, one at 2 % compounded
quarterly to 1.99 % compounded
monthly.
12. Compare the annual yield of two
investments, one at 1.64 % compounded
daily to 1.7 compounded monthly.
Annuity
An annuity is created when you make equal periodic payments into an account that will compound
the money deposited. Any type of investment like this is called an annuity. You are probably
thinking this seems like an IRA or how a retirement plan works. You are correct. These are types
of annuities. In reality, this type of plan is an investment strategy most of us should employ. Most
of us don’t have a large lump sum of money to invest in a savings account and then have the
comfort level to leave it there for years. But, most of us do have a small amount of money, say
$100, that we may invest periodically, say monthly, into an account that compounds the money at
some annual rate, say 3 % , for a period of time, say 10 years. This is an annuity. To visualize what
actually happens in terms of growth to the money, imagine the first month where you place $100
into an account. For the second month, one-twelfth of 3 % interest is added into your account,
which reflects the nominal rate applied to the first $100 and then you have added another $100 into
the account. For the third month, we apply one- twelfth of 3 % interest to the balance of what was
in the account already and then we deposit (or add) another $100 into the account. Let’s stop right
here. If we do this for 10 years, we have a long sum, with one-twelfth of 3 % applied to our account
balance over and over again. We will come back to this elongated sum in a moment. We need to
briefly clarify the nature of sums, first. Why? Because if we clarify the nature of this type of sum
we can take advantage of this repetitive pattern and arrive at a formula for the sum that will not have
all of the middle terms, in this case, the 120 terms representing the amount of money for each month
of this investment.
Sums
There are two fundamental types of sums we will look at, Arithmetic and Geometric. Arithmetic
sums are found where you add many numbers together that differ by the same amount, like 1+2+3+
… + 98+99+100. This is an arithmetic sum or more formally known as an ‘arithmetic series’
because each term in this sum, 1, 2, 3 and so on differs by 1. Now, we could shorten this addition
by realizing we could add the first term to the last term, the second term to the second to last term, 1
+ 100 and 2 + 99 are both 101, and so on. In fact, there are 50 pairs of 101 that comprise this sum,
and 50(101) = 5,050. The sum (series) adds up to 5050. We can find the sum of the first n counting
numbers using the following formula we will derive here. Let S be the value of the sum for the first
n integers, S  1  2  3   n 1  n . And if we mimic the pattern described above by adding S
to itself we will have reduced the solution to a small formula. We have:
S  1  2  3   n 1  n
+ S  n  n 1   3  2  1
2S  n  1  n  1  n  1   n  1  n  1
2S  nn  1
S
nn  1
.
2
Checking our formula for the sum of the first 100 integers we have,
100100  1 100 101
S

 50 101  5050.
2
2
The sum found in our annuity has terms that specifically do not differ by the same amount.
However, each term does differ by the same proportion (the application of interest defined by the
nominal rate which produces a constant effective rate). Mathematical sums of this nature are
referred to as a Geometric sum or series. Appealing to the structure of each term in our annuity we
N
see the exponential model a  b x  P1  i  repeated over and over. we have a series of terms
following a very rigid pattern. Consider the following expanded sum,
a  b n  a  b n 1    a  b 2  a  b 1  a  b 0 . And using the distributive property we can rewrite this
sum as a b n  b n 1    b 2  b1  b 0 . Now, if we focus just on the sum of the b’s to various
powers we will be able to rewirte this large sum as a small formula similar to our arithmetic sum
formula. Let S be equal to the value of the sum
S  b n  b n 1    b 2  b 1  b and rather then adding S to itself we will subtract a multiple of S ,
 bS  b n 1  b n    b 2  b 1 then simplify by collecting like terms and solving for S .


S
b n    b 2  b1  b 0
 bS  b n 1  b n    b 2  b 1
S 1  b  b n 1  b 0
  b n 1  b 0   1  b n 1 
  
 .
and S  
1

b
1

b

 

And the task of summing all the terms in our geometric series has been reduced to applying the
formula we just derived,

a  b n  a  b n 1    a  b 2  a  b 1  a  b 0 = a b n  b n 1    b 2  b1  b 0
 1  b n 1 

= a
 1 b 

Let’s return to our scenario of an annuity. We are making equal periodic payments of $100 each
month into an account that converts interest at an APR of 3 % compounded monthly for 10 years. If
we observe structure of the monthly payments and their growth over the ten year period we see, the
first $100 is compounded 10x12 or 120 times. The next month, the next $100 is compounded one
less number of times or 119 times. The third month’s $100 payment is compounded 118 times. We
continue this process of compounding each $100 until 10 years of $100 deposits and interest
payments have past. All of the money in the account is ours, how much is there? We need to add
up all of these $100 payments and their associated interest accumulations. We have a long sum with
121 terms, too long to write in a short text like this, so we abbreviate our sum as follows:
120
119
118
1
0
 0.03 
 0.03 
 0.03 
 0.03 
 0.03 
100 1 
  100 1 
  100 1 
  ...  100 1 
  100 1 

12 
12 
12 
12 
12 





Even if we write each interest growth factor as 1+0.03/12 = 1.0025, we still have a lengthy sum of
121 terms that looks like the following:
120
119
118
1
0
1001.0025  1001.0025  1001.0025    1001.0025  1001.0025
This is a lot of symbols to write, so we will sum all of these terms by using our geometric series
formula. Over the ten year life span of our annuity our savings strategy has netted us
 1  b n 1 
 1  1.0025121 
  14109.08 dollars. This is 14109.08-12000 = 2109.08 dollars
  100
a
 1  1.0025 
 1 b 
paid to us as rent on our monthly deposits of $100 for ten years. If we made equal periodic
payments of $ 100 per month for 20 years instead of 10 years, we would
 1  1.0025 241 
  $33,012.28 in the account after those 20 years. We deposited into the
have $100
 1  1.0025 
account 12(100)(20) = 24,000 dollars and earned $33,012.28 – $24,000 = $9012.28 in interest
Lets relate the future value of an annuity formula to a generic timeline.
Time line
Pymt
Pymt
Pymt
0
1
2
Pymt
N-1
time at zero is
present day
Pymt
N
there are N interest
conversion periods
One observation that needs to be made first is the number of payments on our time line and the total
number of interest conversion periods. These two numbers are not the same. The total number of
payments is N+1 and the total number of interest conversion periods is N. Now any annuity with
these properties can be calculated fairly quickly and without much difficulty. The sum of all the
terms in our annuity will look like
N
 r
 r
Pymt1    Pymt1  
 n
 n
 Pymt1  i   Pymt1  i 
N

 Pymt 1  i   1  i 
N
N 1
N 1
N 1
1
 r
 r
   Pymt1    Pymt1  
 n
 n
   Pymt1  i   Pymt1  i 
1
   1  i   1  i 
1
0
0
0

and finally, this geometric sum can be rewritten as
 1  1  i  N 1 
 1  1  i  N 1 
 1  1  i  N 1 
 1  i  N 1  1 
  Pymt


  Pymt

Pymt

 1  1  i   Pymt



i
i
 1  1  i  






So, the future value of an annuity where the payment periods coincide with the interest conversion
 1  i  N 1  1
periods is Pymt 
.
i


Present Day Annuity
F. Scott Fitzgerald once said the very rich are different from you and me. In 2000, Alex Rodriquez
signed with the Texas Rangers for a quarter of a billion dollars in a deal that doubled the previous
richest contract in sports history. Specifically, they lured the shortstop with a 10-year, $252 million
contract, to include a $ 10 million dollar signing bonus. Rangers owner Tom Hicks said "Alex is the
player we believe will allow this franchise to fulfill its dream of continuing on its path to becoming
a World Series champion". Hicks had paid $250 million to buy the entire franchise three years prior
from the group headed by George W. Four years later, Rodriguez was playing for the NY Yankees
as he watched the Boston Red Sox foil the curse and win the World Series.
But, signing bonuses are not just for the rich, the athletes, the authors, the musicians, the
broadcasters. Many trades and professions now use signing bonuses as an attraction to lure better
employees. Nurses are needed and are being enticed with an unprecedented assortment of signing
bonuses, relocation reimbursements and incentive packages. From undersized hospitals in Maine to
understaffed large ones in Houston, recruiters are involved in bidding wars for nurses. In
Massachusetts as far back as 1998, to combat the teacher shortage, teachers were offered a $20,000
signing bonus as an incentive. For the past five years, recent pharmacy graduates had their choice of
jobs when they graduated, starting salaries were $75,000 each year, with the added plus that many
employers offered signing bonuses. According to Pharmacy Week, a national pharmacists'
employment publication, signing bonuses of more than $10,000 are reported by 15 percent of
pharmacists; the average bonus is over $5,000.
What do people do with their new signing bonus? Do they supplement their monthly income with
it? They could. Suppose we reverse our ‘annuity’ investment strategy. What would this mean?
Instead of making equal periodic payments into an account for a period of time and watch it
accumulate to a lump sum, let’s take a lump sum of money and withdraw from it equal payments
until the original deposit is zero dollars. A present day annuity looks like an investment strategy
where we invest, say one million dollars, into an account that pays an annual interest rate, say 3 %,
compounded every so often, say monthly, and we withdraw the same amount, equal periodic
withdrawals, of say so much every month for a period of time, say 10 years. How much money
could we withdraw each month?
Where do you see investment strategies like this? An athlete signs a million dollar signing bonus
and then the fairy tale ends as they endure a career ending injury. Naturally, they want to live off of
that signing bonus for the next 30 years. An author signs a 5 million dollar signing bonus and their
book does not sell, so they live off that bonus for 10 years. Also, a couple has saved one million
dollars from age 23 to 59 in annuities and savings accounts. They reinvest the lump sum and want
to live off it for 10 years, while they are still relatively young, until their retirement and Medicare
kicks in. Here, the notion of withdrawals is replaced with monthly payments, but the mathematics is
the same. These are all present day annuities.
The present day annuity equation can be derived from the following discussion and example.
Suppose you have a Lump Sum of money you wish to withdrawal from periodically until all the
money is gone. While you are making withdrawals the remaining portion of your lump sum stays in
the bank and earns interest at the nominal rate, i .
Here we let LS represent our Lump Sum, W represents the amount of our withdrawals and time is
measured in units of interest conversion periods.
Time
0
1
2
Account Balance
LS
1
LS 1  i   W
LS 1  i   W 1  i   W
1
 LS 1  i   W 1  i   W
2
3
LS 1  i 
2
1

 W 1  i   W 1  i   W
1
 LS 1  i   W 1  i   W 1  i   W
3
2
1
4
LS 1  i 
3

 W 1  i   W 1  i   W 1  i   W
2
 LS 1  i   W 1  i   W 1  i   W 1  i   W
4

N
3

LS 1  i   W 1  i 
N
N 1
2
1
   W 1  i   W 1  i   0
1
0
After the N th withdrawal the account balance is zero. It is from this last line where we fully
develop formulas to use when considering situations that represent a Present Day Annuity. The
N
N 1
1
0
equation LS 1  i   W 1  i     W 1  i   W 1  i   0 and a little algebra is all we need. By
pushing all of the negative withdrawals and the interest factors over to the other side of the equation
we now have some recognizable expressions. The left hand side of the equation represents the
future value of a lump sum and the right hand side of the equation is in the familiar form of an
annuity
N
N 1
1
0
LS 1  i   W 1  i     W 1  i   W 1  i  .
We can rewrite the equation and then solve for the withdrawal variable, W . This will give us
exactly what we were looking for, a formula that tells us how much money can we periodically
withdraw from a lump sum earning interest over a specified period of time.
 1  i  N  1
N
N 1
1
0
LS 1  i   W 1  i     W 1  i   W 1  i   W 

i



i
N 
 W  LS 1  i  
 and with a little algebra massage this can be further simplified to
N


1

i

1


i
.
W  LS
N
1  1  i 
Problem One
You land a new job and accept a bonus of $ 10,000 on the first day. What do you do with the
signing bonus? You have choices. Let’s think this through carefully.
a) You could supplement the income with the bonus because some starting salaries are just not
enough to live on. You could use the $10,000 signing bonus to supplement our income over the
next three years. How much could you withdraw each month to help supplement your income if the
bonus was invested in a present day annuity that pays 6% annual compounded monthly.
b) You could invest the bonus to save for a purchase three years in the future because the starting
salary may not provide a means to save for that home or vehicle you want. You can invest the
$10,000 signing bonus today so that the accumulated amount may be used for a one time purchase
three years into the future for say, a down payment on a home or a vehicle. How much money will
you have in three years if your bonus was invested into an account that pays paid 6 % annual
convertible monthly.
c) You could use the bonus to supplement our retirement 30 years in the future because one’s
retirement plan may be below one’s desire for more money in those retirement years. You could use
the $10,000 signing bonus to supplement your retirement plan. Invest the bonus into an account that
pays 6 % annual compounded monthly and leave it there for 30 years. Then in addition, open
another account which is an annuity and pay an affordable and manageable $60 per month for 30
years at 6 % annual, compounded monthly. How much would we have accumulated in 30 years to
add to our retirement?
Solution
For each of the three choices our nominal rate i  .06 12  .005 because the annual interest rate is 6
% and it is compounded monthly.
a) This is an example of a present day annuity. We will have 12(3) = 36 compounding periods, so N
= 36. We will deposit a lump sum and withdraw from it equal periodic payments for three years.
i
.005
W  LS
 10,000
 304.22 dollars.
N
36
1  1  i 
1  1.005
Thus, you would be able to supplement your monthly income by $304.22. Actually, you would
have supplemented your income with 12(3)($304.22) = $10,951.92 over the three years, as opposed
to just the original $10,000 signing bonus.
b) This is a familiar example of compounding a lump sum of money. You will have 12(3) = 36
compounding periods, so N = 36 and the future value of this account is
FV  10000(1  .005) 36  11,966.81 dollars. You would have $11,966.81 available for a down
payment on a car or home in three years.
c) This is an example of compounding a lump sum and then combining this future value with that of
an annuity that has also matured over 30 years. We will have 12(30) = 360 compounding periods,
so N = 360. From the $10,000 bonus, a future value of FV  10000(1  .005) 360  60,225.75 dollars
is to be added to the $60 a month annuity. The future value of this annuity is
 1  i  N  1
 1.005360  1
FV  Pymt 

60


  60,270.90 dollars. Thus, in thirty years, you would
i
.005




have $ 60,270.90 + $ 60,225.72 = $120,496.62 in addition to any other retirement plan.
Problem Two
Now that you have remained steady and faithful to your investments of the $10,000 signing bonus
and the $60 a month annuity, how many dollars can you withdraw monthly from this lump sum over
the next fifteen years into retirement? How many dollars will you have invested in total? How much
money did your personal retirement plan pay you in the form of rent on your money?
Solution
Keeping the same nominal rate, your nest egg of $120,496.62 spread out in monthly withdrawals


.005
 1016.82 dollars
over fifteen years (Present Day Annuity) will pay you 120,496.62
180 
1  1.005 
each month. In the end a total of 180 (1016.82) = 183,027.60 dollars would have been paid out and
the account balance would be zero. Your total investment in this plan would have been the original
10,000 dollar signing bonus and 60 (360) = 21,600 dollars paid into the annuity. Summing these
two dollar amounts gives us a total investment of $31,600. In return you would have earned
$183,027.60 - $31,600.00 = $151,427.60 as rent paid to you on your money.
Problem Three
Let’s examine the age-old question, if you were handed $1 million dollars (you won the Survivor
game that is shown on TV, you won the lottery, you received a signing bonus for the book you just
wrote, you pick the scenario …) could you live off the money for the rest of your life? That is, are
you set for life if you invest this lump sum in a present day annuity at 5 7/8 % annual compounded
monthly for the next 30 years until social security kicks in?
Solution
Since you are compounding monthly at 5 7/8 %, the nominal interest rate, “i” = 0.05875/12 and
there are 12 months in a year and we are compounding for 30 years, that is, 12(30) = 360
compounding periods. You would have
.05875
i
12
W  LS
 1,000,000
 5915.38 dollars per month to live off of if
N
 360
1  1  i 
1  1  .05875
12
you were handed $1,000,000 and needed to make it last for 30 years. We should note, your
$5915.38 monthly allowance when summed over the 30 years is more than two million dollars;
$2,129,536.80. Could you do this?

Exercise Set
Problems 1-10. Signing Bonus; what to
do with the money? Many choices face
the recent college graduate who has been
offered a job with a salary and a signing
bonus. Specifically, what should be
done with the signing bonus? The
choices for what to do with the signing
bonus is the core issue addressed in
problems 1-10.
Problems 1-3. Supplement the income
with the bonus. “Starting salaries are
never enough to live on.” For each
profession below, use the indicated
signing bonus for that profession to
supplement one’s income over the next
three years. How much could one
withdraw each month to help

supplement their income if they invested
the bonus in a present day annuity that
pays paid 5 1/8 % annual compounded
monthly.
1. In 1998, Massachusetts instituted a
$20,000 signing bonus to teachers to
address the concern about attracting
quality teachers.
2. In 2002, the San Jose Mercury News
reported the recent graduates from
nursing school were offered starting
salaries up to $65,000, plus generous
signing bonuses of as much as $5,000.
3. 15 percent of recent pharmacy
graduates have signing bonuses offered
to them of at least $10,000.
Problems 4-6. Use the bonus to save for
a purchase three years in the future.
“Starting salaries rarely provide a means
to save for that home or vehicle you
want.” For each profession below, use
the indicated signing bonus for that
profession to invest today so that the
accumulated amount may be used for a
one time purchase three years away, say
a down payment on a home or a vehicle.
How much money would one have in
three years if they invested their bonus
into an account that pays paid 5 1/8 %
annual compounded monthly.
4. Teachers: Bonus = $20,000.
5. Nurses: Bonus = $5,000
6. Pharmacists: Bonus = $10,000
Problem 7-9. Use the bonus to
supplement one’s retirement 30 years in
the future. “Retirement plans wrapped
up in salaries rarely provide enough
money for one’s retirement.” For each
profession below, use the indicated
signing bonus for that profession to
supplement your retirement plan. Invest
each bonus into an account that pays
5 1/8 % annual compounded monthly
and leave it there for 30 years. Then in
addition open another account which is
an annuity and pay an affordable and
manageable $50 per month for 30 years
at 5 1/8 % annual, compounded monthly.
How much would one have accumulated
in 30 years to add to their retirement?
7. Teachers: Bonus = $20,000.
8. Nurses: Bonus = $5,000
9. Pharmacists: Bonus = $10,000
10. If you were granted a modest bonus,
say $ 10,000 upon accepting a job,
which investment strategy would you
favor and why? The choices are as
follows: use the bonus to invest into a
present day annuity to help supplement
your income short term for three years,
invest the bonus into a savings account
that compounds the money so that in
three years you have a lump sum to put
down on a home or car, or use the
money combined with small payments to
help you when you retire. Write a
paragraph telling the story of your
choice and include the mathematics you
used to arrive at your decision.
11. In 2004, Jevon Kearse became one
of the richest athletes. Kearse landed in
Philadelphia, signing an eight-year, $66
million contract that makes him the
highest paid defensive lineman in NFL
history. The Eagles gave Kearse a $16
million signing bonus, this for a lineman
who had missed 14 games the past two
seasons and whose sack totals had
decreased in each of his first full seasons
in the league. If Kearse endured a career
ending injury his first game of the 2004
season, how much could he live off each
month if he invested the full $16 million
into a present day annuity that paid
5 1/2% annual compounded monthly for
thirty years?
12. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $600 per
year at 12 % compounded annually.
13. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $50 per
month at 12 % compounded annually.
14. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $50 per
month at 12 % annual compounded
quarterly.
15. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $50 per
month at 12 % compounded monthly.
16. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $50 per
month at 12 % compounded daily.
17. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $ 12.50
per week at 12 % compounded monthly.
Hint: Convert the interest rate to a
nominal rate that coincides with the
12
 .12 
52
payment schedule, 1  j   1 
 .
 12 
18. Find the amount of an IRA annuity
after 6 years if you paid into it $50 per
month at 14 ½ % compounded monthly.
19. Mr. and Mrs. Allen have purchased
a $250,000 home. They have made a
20% down payment. The balance was
amortized at 6.5 % compounded
monthly for 30 years.
a) What is their monthly payment?
b) What is amount the Allen’s would
pay in interest at the end of the term of
their loan?
c) How much did the home actually cost
the Allen’s, including interest, if they
paid off the home in the required 30 year
period, assuming no late payments?
d) After 8 years, how much equity have
the Allen’s built up?
e) Half way into the term of their loan,
after 15 years, how much equity
have the Allen’s built up in their
$250,000 home?
f) After 24 years, after 80 percent on
their loan’s term has come and past,
how much equity have the Allen’s
built up?
20. If you pay $50 each month into an
extended Christmas Club account,
paying 8 ½ % interest compounded
monthly, what amount do you have after
8 months? How much did you put into
the account?
21. You know you are not making ends
meet, but help is on the way. Your tax
refund came in last week, so you have
some extra money. You know an extra
$200 per month would balance your
monthly budget. In order to withdraw
$200 per month to help make ends meet
for the next 2 ½ years how much should
you invest today into an account earning
12 % compounded monthly.
22. You have earned a million dollar
signing bonus for taking your new job.
You invest it in a present day annuity at
8 ¾ % annual compounded monthly.
How much money would you be able to
live off if this turned out to be your sole
income for 10 years. Assume you
withdrew equal periodic payments each
month for 10 years?
23. You make $100 payments each
month into an annuity for 20 years at 7
¾ % annual compounded monthly.
After 20 years, you deposit the entire
amount in the account in a present day
annuity that earns 8 ½ percent
compounded monthly. How much could
you withdraw each month if you needed
the money to live off of for another 20
years?
24. Make up numbers tell a story of how
you saved $1,000,000.
25. Preparing for when Murphy’s Law
hits - Career ending injuries.
Here is a list of the top 10 fortunate
athletes. Source: Sports Illustrated and cnn.com,
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/writers/pete_mcent
egart/05/14/money.list/ From the
“Sport’s Illustrated List of the 50
Fortunate -- the best-compensated
athletes ranked by current annual income
– May 2004”
For each athlete, take only their
endorsements and appearance fees and
invest those fees into the same present
day annuity, one that invests 8 ½ %
annual compounded monthly for 30
years. How much could each athlete live
off monthly for 30 years using only their
‘glamour money’, the endorsement and
appearance fees, if their career was to
end tomorrow?
The Fortunate 50
1 Tiger Woods
Salary or winnings (including
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees
Total income
2
Shaquille O'Neal
Golf
$6,673,413
$70,000,000
$76,673,413
Los Angeles
Lakers
Salary or winnings (including
$26,517,858
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $14,000,000
Total income
$40,517,858
Cleveland
3 LeBron James
Cavaliers
Salary or winnings (including
$4,018,920
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $35,000,000
Total income
$39,018,920
4 Peyton Manning
Indianapolis Colts
Salary or winnings (including
$26,900,000
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $9,500,000
Total income
$36,400,000
Minnesota
5 Kevin Garnett
T'wolves
Salary or winnings (including
$29,000,000
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $7,000,000
Total income
$36,000,000
6 Oscar De La Hoya
Boxing
Salary or winnings (including
$30,000,000
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees
Total income
7 Andre Agassi
Salary or winnings (including
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees
Total income
8
Kobe Bryant
$2,000,000
$32,000,000
Tennis
$2,530,929
$24,500,000
$27,030,929
Los Angeles
Lakers
Salary or winnings (including
$13,498,000
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $12,000,000
Total income
$25,498,000
New York
9 Derek Jeter
Yankees
Salary or winnings (including
$19,000,000
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $6,000,000
Total income
$25,000,000
10 Grant Hill
Orlando Magic
Salary or winnings (including
$13,279,250
bonuses)
Endorsements and appearance fees $11,000,000
Total income
$24,279,250
Different Payment and Interest Conversion Periods
One situation requiring a little adjustment in the nominal rate used to calculate the future value of an
annuity type account occurs when the payment time intervals and the interest conversion periods do
not coincide. The development of all of our financial formulas has been dependent on the notion
that both the payment and interest enter the account on the same day.
Suppose you have constructed for yourself a monthly payment structure and you discover a fabulous
deal on an interest bearing account where the interest rate is convertible quarterly? What interest
rate should you use for your calculations? Lets call it j. To derive this pseudo nominal rate you will
need to set both the known or offered growth rate expression and your unknown growth rate
expression equal to each other and then solve for the unknown rate. The equation you will have
developed looks like:
n
1  j   1  r  .
 n
Once you solve or isolate the j variable you can use this to accurately calculate earning due to
interest contributions for accounts such as annuities or payout annuities. Working with the scenario
discussed a 6% compounded quarterly account receiving monthly payments would require finding
the appropriate nominal rate, j to employ in your calculations. The conversion formula is
K
n
4
 rk
 .06  12
j  1    1 and the nominal rate we are looking for is j  1 
 1  .004975 .
4 
 n

An annuity receiving monthly payments of $100 where interest is converted quarterly over a ten
 1.0049751012  1
year period of time will produce an account value of 100 
  16,361.28 dollars. If
.004975


we were to have run the calculations without first converting to incorporate the appropriate nominal
rate we would have produced a future value of $33,128.82. Although this would seem to be a very
popular proposition from the investors point of view the near tripling of funds over the ten year time
period should present to us a red flag that something in our calculation was not right.
Exercise Set
For problems 1-5 convert the stated
interest rate to the appropriate nominal
rate required to accurately calculate the
future value of an account. Then
determine the future value of each
account.
1. $100 is deposited weekly for two
years with an APR of 4 1 %
8
convertible monthly.
2. $50 is deposited weekly for two years
with an APR of 4 1 % convertible
8
daily.
3. $250 is deposited monthly for 18
years with an APR of 6% convertible
daily.
4. $1000 is deposited annually for 18
years with an APR of 5 7 %
8
convertible quarterly.
5. $1000 is deposited monthly for five
years with an APR of 3 1 %
3
convertible daily.
The Mortgage Payment Equation
Because you are the one seeking to rent money for say, a Home Mortgage the ‘Bank’ plays the role
of investor. The bank views you as an investment. Hence, two words, ‘Credit Check’. Your basic
home mortgage works just like a payout annuity with a twist as to the perspective with which we
consider the equation. We need to think how the equation thinks. Since the bank views the
barrower as an investment the right hand side of this equation will represent the bank’s interest in
this transaction. The total quantity of money involved from the bank’s perspective is described
nt
r

using the formula Loan Amount 1   which we write more succinctly as
n

N
Loan Amount1  i  . Now, the left hand side of the equation will represent your contributions or
payment structure for the mortgage. This is simply an annuity formula and our mortgage payment
 1  i  N  1
N
equation looks like, Pymt 
  Loan Amount 1  i  . Applying a little algebra we see the
i


periodic payment for this loan will be



i
i
N 


Pymt  Loan Amount 1  i   

Loan
Amount
.


N
N 
 1  i   1
1  1  i  
Example
A $200,000 mortgage that has been financed over 30 years at 6% APR and is compounded monthly
will have a monthly payment




i
.005
Pymt  Loan Amount 
 Pymt  200,000
 1199.10 .
N 
 360 
1  1  i  
1  1.005

The monthly payment for a 200,000 dollar mortgage loan at 6% APR convertible monthly is
1,199.10 dollars.
Each mortgage payment can be divided into two distinct pieces the interest portion and the principal
portion, Payment = Interest Due + Principal. Recall, the amount of interest paid following one
interest conversion period under an compound interest scenario is I  P1  i   P  Pi . Throughout
the life of a mortgage the interest portion of the payment will decrease as the remaining principal
portion increases. This is the result of paying down the outstanding balance. Interest due at the end
of each interest conversion period is found by multiplying the outstanding balance by the nominal
rate, (Outstanding Balance)  i . The interest portion owed to the bank from the first payment of a
loan is (Loan Amount) i . For our $200,000 loan the interest due after one month is
($200,000)(. 005)  $1000.00 . Given our monthly payment for this loan was
$1199.10  $1000.00  $199.10 this leaves only $199.10 for the principal portion of the payment
which reduces the outstanding balance.
Outstanding Balance, Interest and Principal portions of a Mortgage Payment
The outstanding balance on a mortgage after making any regularly scheduled payment can be
derived from the mortgage payment equation. After some algebraic manipulation we can arrive at
1  1  i n  N 
the formula Outstanding Balance   Pymt 
 . Notice in the exponent position there is
i


the term n  N . The lower case n represents the payment number and the capital N represents the
total number of payments to be made throughout the life of the loan. The interest portion of the
n th payment is found by multiplying the outstanding balance after the previous payment n  1st by
the nominal rate. Using our outstanding balance formula we see the portion of our n th payment
going to interest due is,
1  1  i n 1 N 
n 1 N
(Outstanding Balance after n - 1 payments) i  Pymt 
. The
  i  Pymt 1  1  i 
i


n 1 N
amount of interest owed at the time of the n th payment is I n  Pymt 1  1  i 
. Expanding this








formula we have I n  Pymt 1  1  i 
which we read as: Interest Due
 Pymt  Pymt1  i 
= Payment - Principal portion of the Payment. And for free we have derived the principal portion
n 1 N
of the n th monthly payment, Pymt1  i 
. Putting all of the pieces together we can now
construct what is called an Amortization schedule.
Time
0
1

n

360
n 1 N
n 1 N
Payment
Interest Due
Principal
$1199.10

$1000.00

$199.10



N 
1  1  i  
Loan Amount 

$1199.10
i

Pymt 1  1  i n 1 N

$5.97

Balance
$200,000.00
$199,800.90

Pymt 1  i n 1 N
1  1  i n  N 
Pymt 

i



$1193.13

$0.00
Problem One Good Credit verses Poor Credit
Now that you have landed your dream job and are planning for your future you create a plan to
purchase your first home. First, you need to save for a down payment on your purchase. Today you
invest your $3000.00 nest egg into an account that pays 3% compounded monthly and start a $50.00
a month annuity into an account that pays 6% both accounts remain intact over the next six years
while you work on your credit. In today’s market an individual with good credit can obtain a 15
7
year mortgage loan for about 4 % APR compounded monthly and someone with poor credit may
8
obtain a mortgage with an interest rate of 9%. Is it worth maintaining a good credit rating?
Solution
After six years your two savings accounts have produced a total of $8132.67;
  .06  72 
  1
 1 
72
12
 .04 


  $4320.44 . You have also found the perfect
$30001 
  $3812.23 and $50 


.06
 12 


12


little condo for sale; $120,000.00. Using your savings for the down payment you look for a bank
willing to invest in you. You need another $120,000 - $8132.67 = $111,867.33 to make the
purchase. Under the good credit scenario your 15 year mortgage payment will be


.04875
12

  $877.37 . Over the entire life of this loan you will have
Pymt  $111,867.33
180 

1  1  .04875
12


paid the bank $877.37 180  $157,926.60 . The bank would have collected
$157,926.60  $111,867.33  $46,059.27 as rent on the money you borrowed. Now, suppose you
neglected to take care of your credit rating and were considered to be a bit more of a risk in the eyes
of the bank. The best interest rate you can obtain for the purchase of your first home is 9%. Your


.09
12

  $1134.63 . Over the entire life of
monthly payment will be Pymt  $111,867.33
180 

.09
1  1  12

the loan you will have paid the bank $1134.63 180  $204,233.40 . And the bank would have
collected $204,233.40  $111,867.33  $92,366.07 as rent on your loan. By maintaining a good
credit rating you will have saved $92,366.07  $46,059.27  $46,306.80 .




Problem Two
In Problem One we see maintaining good credit really pays. Based on the two different cases how
much difference will there be in Equity after 5 years of payments?
Solution
In this problem we will consider Equity as the portion of the home you actually have paid off at a
specific time. In both cases we will determine the outstanding balance after five years of payments
and subtract this from the sale price of the home. After 60 payments the good credit scenario
produces an outstanding balance of


1  1  .04875 60180 
12
  $83,198.07
$877.37 


.04875
12


and the equity is $120,000  $83,198.07  $36,801.93 . Five years of payments under the poor credit
scenario provides for an outstanding balance of
1  1  .09 60180 
12
  $89,569.61
$1134.63


.09
12


and the equity is $120,000  $89,569.61  $30,430.39 . There is more than $6000.00 difference in
equity after five years between the good and poor credit scenarios. The good credit loan pays less
each month and produces more equity! Because of your diligence in maintaining a good credit
rating in these past five years you have acquired 5% more in equity.


Exercise Set
For problems 1-4 use the following
information. In November of 2003 the
maximum amount of money one could
borrow under the terms of a
conventional loan was $322,700.00.
1. Find the monthly payment for the
maximum conventional loan if you
received the loan and agreed to repay the
monies over the next 30 years at an APR
of 5 3 % convertible monthly.
8
2. What dollar amount of the first
payment goes to interest?
3. What dollar amount of the first
payment goes toward paying down the
outstanding balance?
4. After the first payment, find the new
outstanding balance.
For problems 5-8 continue to use the
maximum conventional loan amount of
$322,700.00.
5. Find the monthly payment for the
maximum conventional loan if you
received the loan and agreed to repay the
monies over the next 15 years at an APR
of 4 7 % convertible monthly.
8
6. What dollar amount of the first
payment goes to interest?
7. What dollar amount of the first
payment goes toward paying down the
outstanding balance?
8. After the first payment, find the new
outstanding balance.
For problems 9-17 use the following
information. A 30 year home mortgage
has been acquired for $200,000.00 under
the terms monthly payments will be
made to satisfy an annual percentage rate
of 6%, compounded monthly.
9. After five years of payments, how
much of the 61st payment will go
directly to paying interest due?
10. After five years of payments, how
much of the 61st payment will go to
paying down the outstanding balance?
11. What is the outstanding balance on
the mortgage immediately following the
60th payment?
12. After 15 years of payments, how
much of the 181st payment will go
directly to paying interest due?
13. After 15years of payments, how
much of the 181st payment will go to
paying down the outstanding balance?
14. What is the outstanding balance on
the mortgage immediately following the
180th payment?
15. After 25 years of payments, how
much of the 301st payment will go
directly to paying interest due?
16. After 25years of payments, how
much of the 301st payment will go to
paying down the outstanding balance?
17. What is the outstanding balance on
the mortgage immediately following the
300th payment?
For problems 18-22 use the following
information. You have enough money
saved to make a 10% cash down
payment on a $200,000 home or an 8%
cash down payment on a $250,000
home. In both cases the APR is 6%
compounded monthly. For the $200,000
home you can afford to amortize the
loan over 20 years and for the $250,000
home you need to extend the life of the
loan to 30 years.
18. Calculate the monthly payment for
each loan.
19. Calculate and compare the total
amount of interest paid over the life of
each loan.
20. Determine the amount of equity
accrued in each home after 5 years of
payments have been made.
21. Determine the amount of equity
accrued in each home after 10 years of
payments have been made.
22. Determine the amount of equity
accrued in each home after 15 years of
payments have been made.
After graduating from college you
decide its okay to marry your soul mate.
The two of you receive $1000 in cash
from friends and family for the wedding
and you also have received $500 in cash
as graduation gifts. Being diligent in
college has paid off as well. The two of
you as you have also landed that first job
and are able to save $75 each month to
use as a down payment on your first
home 4 years after graduation. The first
home you purchase is a $117,500 condo.
You have been saving for the down
payment with both the lump sum deposit
of $1500 into a CD paying 5 7 %
8
compounded daily and an annuity with
$75 monthly payments into a regular
savings account paying 2 7 %
8
compounded daily. Four years have
passed and you are ready for your first
30 year mortgage.
23. Considering both accounts, how
much money has been saved for a down
payment?
24. Given that the sale price of the condo
is $117,500 what are the monthly
payments after the down payment has
been applied?
25. Over the 30 year life of the mortgage
how much interest would have been paid
to the bank?
26. How much equity will you have
accrued in the home after the first year?
27. How much equity will you have
accrued in the home after the fifth year?
28. How much equity will you have
accrued in the home after the 15th year?
29. How much equity will you have
accrued in the home after the 25th year?
30. How much equity will you have
accrued in the home after the 29th year?