Download - Fairview High School

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Hot Wheels of Glory
(An Acceleration Lab)
Background:
In this lab you are going to investigate the relationship between time and how far
an accelerating object travels? For example, will an accelerating object travel
take twice as long to travel twice as far? Will it take three times as long to
travel three times as far?
To find out you will allow a hot wheels car, starting from rest, to roll down a
ramp – in this case a table propped up by two or three books. You will measure
the time it takes for the car to go from the top of the ramp 25 cm, then the
time it takes to go 50 cm, 75 cm, 100 cm, and 125 cm. You will take the
average of at least three trials at each distance.
After making a neat, properly labeled data table and collecting all data, you will
make a proper, full-page graph of distance traveled vs. time it took. Distance
will go on the y-axis and time on the x-axis. Be sure to include (0,0) as a data
point.
You will then use your graph to write a conclusion in which you summarize your
purpose, hypothesis, results and technique answer the basic question posed by
this lab.
The force of gravity pulling on the car is
constant
1
Hot Wheels of Glory
(An Acceleration Lab)
Background:

Acceleration = Any change in velocity.

Unbalanced forces cause acceleration.

A constant unbalanced force will cause constant acceleration.

On Earth’s surface, gravity is a constant force.

THREE POSSIBLE GRAPHICAL RELATIONSHIPS (COPY ALL):
Direct
It will take twice
Relationship the time to go
twice the distance.
Straight line on a
distance-time
graph
Exponential It will take less
Relationship than twice the time
to go twice the
distance.
Ever steepening
line on a
distance-time
graph.
Decay
It will take more
Relationship than twice the time
to go twice the
distance.
Ever flattening
line on a
distance-time
graph.
Purpose:
What is the relationship between time and distance
for an object accelerated by a constant force?
Prediction:
Make a prediction that answers the question in the purpose.
Write your prediction in words and sketch the shape you
predict for the D-T graph.
2
Materials:

Table (RAMP)

4-6 of the same book

Masking tape

Stopwatch

Hot Wheels Car

Meter Stick
Tips and Tricks:
CARS! Treat them as if they were a fine piece of scientific equipment
BOOKS: Probably stack three high
Data:

Create a data table capable of holding all the data described in the introductory paragraph.
Distance (cm)
0
Time (seconds)
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
Average
0
0
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
3
Hot Wheels of Glory Post Lab
Hand Graph:

Create a distance vs time graph of your data on the top half of a piece of graph paper. On the
bottom half create a distance vs. time graph of the ideal data (Mr. Rundell’s).

Put time on the x-axis and distance on the y-axis.
IDEAL DATA:
Distance (cm):
Time (s)
0
0.00
20
2.18
40
3.53
60
4.57
80
5.44
100
6.21
120
6.90
Questions
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
How far did the Hot Wheels car go in 1.0 s?
How far did the Hot Wheels car go in 2.0 s?
As time is doubled, what happens to distance (doubles, more than doubles, less than doubles)?
How many times farther did it go in 2.0 s compared to 1.0 s? Divide the distance travelled in 2.0 s by
the distance travelled in 1.0 s to get your answer.
Describe the shape of the graph of distance vs time (D-T graph).
Why does this graph have the shape it does.
Compare the D-T graph of your own data to the D-T graph of the ideal data. Describe how they similar
and how they are different.
Explain (give reasons) why your own graph and the ideal graph may look quite different.
Conclusion:
Write a conclusion in which you summarize your purpose, hypothesis, results, technique and answer the
basic question posed by this lab. Support your answer with specific data from the lab. Refer to your
reference on conclusion writing. Below is a short version. Write one paragraph for each number.
1. Restate Lab PURPOSE and PREDICTION (or Hypothesis): Prediction or hypothesis
exactly matches the lab purpose … meaning it uses the same variables.
2. Exactly describe the PROCEDURE (what you did). What are the independent and
dependent variables?
3. State if the DATA do or do not support your prediction/hypothesis. Explain what the
data show or mean. Cite examples (real numbers, graph slopes, etc.)
4. Explain SOURCES OF ERROR. Describe uncontrolled CONSTANTS and how data is
affected. State opinion if data is still valid. Details support opinion.
5. Compare lab to a real world example and/or suggest a logical new experiment. Explain
why your choice is important, interesting or relevant.
4
Conclusion
Conclusion Rubric: (attach to conclusion, turn in)
Detail
missing
Some
detail
Complete
detail
1
Restate Lab PURPOSE and PREDICTION (or Hypothesis): Prediction or
hypothesis exactly matches the lab purpose … meaning it uses the same variables.
1
3
5
2
Exactly describe the PROCEDURE (what you did). What are the independent and
dependent variables?
1
3
5
3
State if the DATA do or do not support your prediction/hypothesis. Explain
what the data show or mean. Cite examples (real numbers, graph slopes, etc.)
1
3
5
4
Explain SOURCES OF ERROR. Describe uncontrolled CONSTANTS and how
data is affected. State opinion if data is still valid. Details support opinion.
1
3
5
5
Compare lab to a real world example and/or suggest a logical new experiment.
Explain why your choice is important, interesting or relevant.
1
3
5
5