• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Jacobs - NYU School of Law
Jacobs - NYU School of Law

... - idea that blame and punishment are inappropriate and unfair in the absence of choice - moral fault; the kind of awareness or intention that must accompany the prohibited act, under the terms of the statute defining the offense -we shouldn’t convict somebody unless they have foresight of consequenc ...
Manaster Torts Outline
Manaster Torts Outline

... 2. Summer v. Tice: two hunters both negligently fire gun, victim shot by one but by whom? If neither know, neither can prove it was the other, both held liable a. But-for Test does not work – cannot say but for action of one, harm would not have happened b. Substantial Factors Test does not work, be ...
Torts analytical frameworks
Torts analytical frameworks

... prudent person would under same/similar circumstances to minimize or avoid risks of harm to others") -established by a statute? (think negligence per se) or custom? Breach? -did D exercise due care that a reasonable person would under the circumstances? -does D have any excuse/defense for violating ...
Criminal Law
Criminal Law

... going to repeal a law on adultery, how will that play in a campaign) -The risk here might be under-punishment, but is the risk that great? Not really because politicians will no doubt grandstand over judicial activism here; that’s why many jurisdictions still allow for the open practice of desuetude ...
DWI Penalties - Virtual Drive of Texas
DWI Penalties - Virtual Drive of Texas

... controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, or a combination of two or more of those substances or any other substance into the body; or... (b) Having an alcohol concentration of .08 or more [PC 49.01 (2)(A)&(B)]. Note: The DWI law is not age specific and individuals of any age may be charged wi ...
Intro to Torts
Intro to Torts

TORTS(2) - Ole Miss LSSB
TORTS(2) - Ole Miss LSSB

... b. Example – trespass to land – if enter land by mistake, still liable even if thought it was your land Insanity – not a defense in negligence or intentional tort actions a. Insane people are liable for their intentional actions (same rules as negligence) b. Policy reasons?  Encourage those with in ...
Torts Outline - Blogs @ Widener Law
Torts Outline - Blogs @ Widener Law

... a. Evidence of custom and general use is admissible because it can establish a standard by which ordinary care can be judged. Custom can prove harm was foreseeable, that D knew or should have known risks, the risk was unreasonable unless customary precautions taken. (Duncan) b. Reasonable men can re ...
Title 17-A - Maine Legislature
Title 17-A - Maine Legislature

... B. Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly damages or destroys property in an amount exceeding $2,000 in value, to enable any person to collect insurance proceeds for the loss caused; [2005, c. 660, §1 (AMD).] C. Intentionally, knowingly or recklessly damages, destroys or tampers with the property of ...
Glossary of terms
Glossary of terms

... a probation officer for a period not less than one nor more than three years. 33. Regional Development Index (RDI) is a composite index which measures the relative development of regions by municipal/village council areas. The index ranges between 0 (most disadvantaged) to 1 (most advantaged). 34. R ...
Legal terms
Legal terms

... Assuming that I can reasonably anticipate the result of my act or omission, what standard of care does the law___from me? How do I know when I have breached my duty of care? To answer this question, most English law students are asked to remember the general principle of negligence provided by a jud ...
Torts Outline - UChicago BLSA
Torts Outline - UChicago BLSA

... ii. Madden v. D.C. Transit System (NL): absent showing of specific wrongful intent, exhaust fumes fr bus cannot constitute offensive physical contact. iii. Wallace v. Rosen: consent assumed for all common and “reasonably necessary” contact in ordinary life. B. Consent a. Defense: i. Negates what wou ...
- UVic LSS
- UVic LSS

... Ryan v Victoria (para 28) “Conduct is negligent if it creates an objectively unreasonable risk of harm” ...
I. INTENTIONAL TORTS - Intent - purposefully causing elements of
I. INTENTIONAL TORTS - Intent - purposefully causing elements of

... - Typically a statute setting a standard of care creates a shortcut for establishing negligence - If a statute provides a civil remedy - apply the statute without going to trial - Regulations work like statutes and may set standard of care for a situation - violation = negligence - For a statute to ...
DWI and the B-Card - Minnesota House of Representatives
DWI and the B-Card - Minnesota House of Representatives

... information arises from a DWI arrest. More often, it stems from a traffic stop that involves alcohol but does not constitute impaired driving. Other times, the drinking is discovered by officers called to a domestic altercation or is reported by a spouse, neighbor, or other source. There does not ne ...
Glossary of Ethics T..
Glossary of Ethics T..

... assessment. Requiring investigators to divest themselves of investments that they may have made on the basis of their scientific judgment would be too burdensome, and might even suppress publication.) Dictionary definitions frequently apply the term only to conflicts between a person's private inter ...
notes95
notes95

... Who is an employee? A term used by parties to describe their relationship is not definitive in nature and a court must decide as a matter of law: Narich v Commissioner of Pay-roll Tax (1983). A prominent factor in determining the nature of the relationship is the degree of control which the employer ...
Word - Washington University School of Law
Word - Washington University School of Law

... 3. reality is that most patients follow advice of doctor, but this protects the idiosyntractic patient who does not have he same values as most, and this is an info forcing rule to get info to the patients who would follow docs advice with or without information. iv. Cost benefit analysis: going bey ...
GENERAL ELEMENTS FOR TRESPASS TRESSPASS TO PERSON
GENERAL ELEMENTS FOR TRESPASS TRESSPASS TO PERSON

... § Consent may be given expressly by words or be implied from conduct (e.g. a medical emergency). § A person is deemed to consent to a reasonable degree of physical contact as a result of social interaction (see Collins v Wilcock). • Other considerations § Intention is irrelevant. Must the act be ...
Biometric Confirmations Throughout the Criminal Justice Process
Biometric Confirmations Throughout the Criminal Justice Process

... Low cost: Any ID Networks Livescan system can be upgraded to include FingerVerify. Automated features: Supports the use of barcode readers to quickly enter search criteria (name, TCN, Jail ID). Easy to read results: Users are presented with a green (verified) or red (no match) screen that indicates ...
Anns/Cooper Test
Anns/Cooper Test

... A reasonable person does not create or proceed in the face of “unreasonable” risk. To avoid liability, a person must exercise the standard of care that would be expected of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person in the same circumstances (Vaughn). The measure of what is reasonable depends on th ...
here
here

... a. Prudent Person - The standard of reasonable care applies to all negligence actions, i.e., the reasonable person must exercise care in proportion to the danger involved in his act, and that he or she must exercise such care not only for his own safety and the protection of his property but also to ...
- UVic LSS
- UVic LSS

... o No tort just for statutory breach - Complying with statute does not mean that you are not negligent; it depends - Concernscreating a nominate tort of statutory breach is creating a strict liability scenario; if legislature wanted to do so, they would have Sask Wheat Pool  Breach of statutory sta ...
Chapter 3 Ethics and Law
Chapter 3 Ethics and Law

... Example: You accuse someone of having AIDS, (they don’t). ...
Searches Without a Warrant
Searches Without a Warrant

... 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be se ...
< 1 2 >

Reasonable person

For reasonable person in psychology, see Reasonable Person ModelIn law, a reasonable person (historically reasonable man) is a composite of a relevant community's judgment as to how a typical member of said community should behave in situations that might pose a threat of harm (through action or inaction) to the public.The term is used to explain the law to a jury. The ""reasonable person"" is an emergent concept of common law. While there is loose consensus in black letter law, there is no accepted technical definition. As a legal fiction, the ""reasonable person"" is not an average person or a typical person, leading to great difficulties in applying the concept in some criminal cases, especially in regards to the partial defence of provocation.The standard also holds that each person owes a duty to behave as a reasonable person would under the same or similar circumstances. While the specific circumstances of each case will require varying kinds of conduct and degrees of care, the reasonable person standard undergoes no variation itself.The ""reasonable person"" construct can be found applied in many areas of the law. The standard performs a crucial role in determining negligence in both criminal law—that is, criminal negligence—and tort law.The standard also has a presence in contract law, though its use there is substantially different. It is used to determine contractual intent, or if a breach of the standard of care has occurred, provided a duty of care can be proven. The intent of a party can be determined by examining the understanding of a reasonable person, after consideration is given to all relevant circumstances of the case including the negotiations, any practices the parties have established between themselves, usages and any subsequent conduct of the parties.The standard does not exist independently of other circumstances within a case that could affect an individual's judgment.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report