Lecture_ai_3 - WordPress.com
... • Interpretation of implication is T if the previous statement has T value • Interpretation of Biconditionalis T only when symbols on the both sides are either T or F ,otherwise F ...
... • Interpretation of implication is T if the previous statement has T value • Interpretation of Biconditionalis T only when symbols on the both sides are either T or F ,otherwise F ...
Discrete Computational Structures (CS 225) Definition of Formal Proof
... When we write a proof, we will number each line, and justify it by citing its source. When justifying the application of equivalency rules and argument forms, we will give the name of the logical principle we are using, along with the line number(s) to which the rule or form is applied. For example, ...
... When we write a proof, we will number each line, and justify it by citing its source. When justifying the application of equivalency rules and argument forms, we will give the name of the logical principle we are using, along with the line number(s) to which the rule or form is applied. For example, ...
KNOWLEDGE
... some kind which ‘exists’ in the world. One objection is that it is the meaning of statements or beliefs which count, and this is what a proposition (p) is. Propositions rather than beliefs carry truth or falsity. I should say “p is true and I believe it” rather than “I believe p”. ...
... some kind which ‘exists’ in the world. One objection is that it is the meaning of statements or beliefs which count, and this is what a proposition (p) is. Propositions rather than beliefs carry truth or falsity. I should say “p is true and I believe it” rather than “I believe p”. ...
Logic for Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell:
... is necessary for the combinations of truth-value assignments to q’s component propositions displayed in t to be just the possible ones). 5. If presupposition p is a proposition, then truth-table t is a proof that q has the modal status displayed in t only if p is also shown to be true. 6. This raise ...
... is necessary for the combinations of truth-value assignments to q’s component propositions displayed in t to be just the possible ones). 5. If presupposition p is a proposition, then truth-table t is a proof that q has the modal status displayed in t only if p is also shown to be true. 6. This raise ...
(˜P ∨ ˜Q) are tautologically equivalent by constructing a truth
... 8. ˜R → P. ˜S → ˜P. R → S ∴ R 9. ˜Z. (R → ˜Z) → (Q ∧ P ) ∴ (Q ∧ P ) 10. ˜R. P ↔ (R ∧ (P ∨ S)) ∴ P → ˜S 11. ˜((P ↔ Q) ∨ ˜(Q → P )) ∴ ˜Q ∧ P ...
... 8. ˜R → P. ˜S → ˜P. R → S ∴ R 9. ˜Z. (R → ˜Z) → (Q ∧ P ) ∴ (Q ∧ P ) 10. ˜R. P ↔ (R ∧ (P ∨ S)) ∴ P → ˜S 11. ˜((P ↔ Q) ∨ ˜(Q → P )) ∴ ˜Q ∧ P ...
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Latin for ""Logico-Philosophical Treatise"") is the only book-length philosophical work published by the German-Austrian philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein in his lifetime. The project had a broad aim – to identify the relationship between language and reality and to define the limits of science – and is recognized as a significant philosophical work of the twentieth century. G. E. Moore originally suggested the work's Latin title as homage to the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus by Baruch Spinoza.Wittgenstein wrote the notes for the Tractatus while he was a soldier during World War I and completed it when a prisoner of war at Como and later Cassino in August 1918. It was first published in German in 1921 as Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. The Tractatus was influential chiefly amongst the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, such as Rudolf Carnap and Friedrich Waismann. Bertrand Russell's article ""The Philosophy of Logical Atomism"" is presented as a working out of ideas that he had learned from Wittgenstein.The Tractatus employs a notoriously austere and succinct literary style. The work contains almost no arguments as such, but rather consists of declarative statements that are meant to be self-evident. The statements are hierarchically numbered, with seven basic propositions at the primary level (numbered 1–7), with each sub-level being a comment on or elaboration of the statement at the next higher level (e.g., 1, 1.1, 1.11, 1.12).Wittgenstein's later works, notably the posthumously published Philosophical Investigations, criticised many of the ideas in the Tractatus.