
Complementary Angles
... What if you were given two angles of unknown size and were told they form a linear pair? How would you determine their angle measures? After completing this Concept, you’ll be able to use the definition of linear pair to solve problems like this one. Guidance ...
... What if you were given two angles of unknown size and were told they form a linear pair? How would you determine their angle measures? After completing this Concept, you’ll be able to use the definition of linear pair to solve problems like this one. Guidance ...
Teacher`s Math Standard`s Guide, PDF, 243kb
... 1.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the ...
... 1.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 20 to solve word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the ...
(Greater than 90 degrees)
... •In the first quadrant the principal angle and related acute angle are always the same •In the second quadrant we get the principal angle by taking (180º - related acute angle) •In the third quadrant we can get the principal angle by taking (180º + related acute angle) •In the fourth quadrant we can ...
... •In the first quadrant the principal angle and related acute angle are always the same •In the second quadrant we get the principal angle by taking (180º - related acute angle) •In the third quadrant we can get the principal angle by taking (180º + related acute angle) •In the fourth quadrant we can ...
SLT 6 Construct a line parallel to a given line
... 2. Straightedge: Anything that allows you to produce a straight line. A straightedge should not be able to measure distances. An index card works well as a straightedge. You can also use a ruler as a straightedge, as long as you only use it to draw straight lines and not to measure. 3. Paper: When a ...
... 2. Straightedge: Anything that allows you to produce a straight line. A straightedge should not be able to measure distances. An index card works well as a straightedge. You can also use a ruler as a straightedge, as long as you only use it to draw straight lines and not to measure. 3. Paper: When a ...
Euclidean geometry

Euclidean geometry is a mathematical system attributed to the Alexandrian Greek mathematician Euclid, which he described in his textbook on geometry: the Elements. Euclid's method consists in assuming a small set of intuitively appealing axioms, and deducing many other propositions (theorems) from these. Although many of Euclid's results had been stated by earlier mathematicians, Euclid was the first to show how these propositions could fit into a comprehensive deductive and logical system. The Elements begins with plane geometry, still taught in secondary school as the first axiomatic system and the first examples of formal proof. It goes on to the solid geometry of three dimensions. Much of the Elements states results of what are now called algebra and number theory, explained in geometrical language.For more than two thousand years, the adjective ""Euclidean"" was unnecessary because no other sort of geometry had been conceived. Euclid's axioms seemed so intuitively obvious (with the possible exception of the parallel postulate) that any theorem proved from them was deemed true in an absolute, often metaphysical, sense. Today, however, many other self-consistent non-Euclidean geometries are known, the first ones having been discovered in the early 19th century. An implication of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity is that physical space itself is not Euclidean, and Euclidean space is a good approximation for it only where the gravitational field is weak.Euclidean geometry is an example of synthetic geometry, in that it proceeds logically from axioms to propositions without the use of coordinates. This is in contrast to analytic geometry, which uses coordinates.