• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem
Converse of the Pythagorean Theorem

CS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 7 — Solutions
CS 103X: Discrete Structures Homework Assignment 7 — Solutions

... are two numbers i, j in this sample such that i|j. Solution For 1 ≤ i ≤ n, define a subset Ai of {1, 2, . . . , 2n} as follows: Ai = {x ∈ A : ∃a ∈ N : x = (2i − 1) × 2a }. The set Ai includes the i-th odd number and the products of that number with powers of 2, up to 2n. These sets have the property ...
Greatest Common Divisors and Linear Combinations Let a and b be
Greatest Common Divisors and Linear Combinations Let a and b be

Series, Part 1 - UCSD Mathematics
Series, Part 1 - UCSD Mathematics

PDF
PDF

March - The Euler Archive - Mathematical Association of America
March - The Euler Archive - Mathematical Association of America

Full text
Full text

Full-text PDF - American Mathematical Society
Full-text PDF - American Mathematical Society

... Statement (4) is completely routine and (1) is essentially Theorem 5.5A of [1]. Statements (2) and (3) are established in §2. Throughout this note all spaces should be assumed to be CW-complexes of finite type. As a corollary to the statements (l)-(4) above, one sees that the number #[AaA; A] of pro ...
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM* (Proof by contradiction) Y.K. Leong
REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM* (Proof by contradiction) Y.K. Leong

Solution - Austin Mohr
Solution - Austin Mohr

HW 2 Solutions
HW 2 Solutions

Notes on Solving Quadratic Equations by Factoring
Notes on Solving Quadratic Equations by Factoring

Solution
Solution

... A Carmichael number is a composite number n satisfying xn−1 ≡ 1 (mod n) for all x ∈ Z× n . Carmichael number are exactly those numbers for which there exist no Fermat witnesses, although they are not prime. The Fermat test will always answer ‘probably prime’ for these numbers, in spite of the fact t ...
a pdf file - The Citadel
a pdf file - The Citadel

“No professor has been asked questions by all of his students
“No professor has been asked questions by all of his students

Introduction to Discrete Mathematics
Introduction to Discrete Mathematics

ODE Lecture Notes, Section 5.3
ODE Lecture Notes, Section 5.3

... To prove a solution of P  x  y  Q  x  y  R  x  y  0  y  p  x  y  q  x  y can be written as ...
Lecture 4 - CSE@IIT Delhi
Lecture 4 - CSE@IIT Delhi

Lucas` square pyramid problem revisited
Lucas` square pyramid problem revisited

... infinitely many congruent numbers in each residue class modulo 8 (and, in particular, infinitely many squarefree congruent numbers, congruent to 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 modulo 8). We can generalize this as follows: ...
A note on Kostka numbers - Queen Mary University of London
A note on Kostka numbers - Queen Mary University of London

MEI Conference 2009 Proof
MEI Conference 2009 Proof

... 12. Every positive integer can be written in the form a 2 + b 2 − c 2 where a, b and c are integers 13. For any polynomial equation x n + an −1 x n −1 + ... + a2 x 2 + a1 + a0 = 0 where all the coefficients are integers, if any roots are rational numbers then they must be integers. 14. An equilatera ...
Balancing in direction (1,−1) in Pascal`s Triangle Introduction
Balancing in direction (1,−1) in Pascal`s Triangle Introduction

SESSION 1: PROOF 1. What is a “proof”
SESSION 1: PROOF 1. What is a “proof”

Full text
Full text

1998 - CEMC - University of Waterloo
1998 - CEMC - University of Waterloo

... Since the total amount of floor covered when the rugs do not overlap is 200 m 2 and the total covered when they do overlap is 140 m 2 , then 60 m 2 of rug is wasted on double or triple layers. Thus, a + b + c + 2 k = 60 (2). Subtract equation (1) from equation (2) to get 2 k = 36 and solve for k = 1 ...
< 1 ... 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ... 65 >

Fermat's Last Theorem



In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation an + bn = cn for any integer value of n greater than two. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 were known to have infinitely many solutions. This theorem was first conjectured by Pierre de Fermat in 1637 in the margin of a copy of Arithmetica where he claimed he had a proof that was too large to fit in the margin. The first successful proof was released in 1994 by Andrew Wiles, and formally published in 1995, after 358 years of effort by mathematicians. The theretofore unsolved problem stimulated the development of algebraic number theory in the 19th century and the proof of the modularity theorem in the 20th century. It is among the most notable theorems in the history of mathematics and prior to its proof it was in the Guinness Book of World Records for ""most difficult mathematical problems"".
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report