• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Algebra I
Algebra I

Explanation via surplus structure.
Explanation via surplus structure.

S1-Equivariant K-Theory of CP1
S1-Equivariant K-Theory of CP1

... If X is a G -space and {Ex : x ∈ X } is a collection of finite dimensional vector spaces, we call E = tx∈X Ex a G -vector bundle if it is equipped with certain topological structure and a continuous action of G such that g .Ex = Eg .x . Example. (The Hopf Bundle) A canonical example of a S 1 -bundle ...
Cohomology jump loci of quasi-projective varieties Botong Wang June 27 2013
Cohomology jump loci of quasi-projective varieties Botong Wang June 27 2013

Functors and natural transformations A covariant functor F : C → D is
Functors and natural transformations A covariant functor F : C → D is

... For W a topological space, let [B, W ] be the set of homotopy classes of maps f : B → W . Theorem For each topological group G, there is a space BG called the classifying space of G and an isomorphism of functors between FG and the functor B → [B, BG]. The homotopy class of the identity map BG → BG ...
PDF
PDF

... 1. A subset A ⊂ V (K) is said to be of type C1 if there is a closed subset W ⊂ V , with W 6= V , such that A ⊂ W (K). In other words, A is not dense in V (with respect to the Zariski topology). 2. A subset A ⊂ V (K) is said to be of type C2 if there is an irreducible variety V 0 of the same dimensio ...
Exercise sheet 5
Exercise sheet 5

... 2. (a) You have 7 pieces of paper, and you apply the following procedure as many times as you want: Pick any one of your pieces of paper and cut it in 7. Show that you can never get 1997 pieces of paper. Hint: Think modulo 6. (b) Find the remainder in the division by 3 of each of the following numbe ...
Categories and functors
Categories and functors

... b. I will say as little as you let me about set theory. It suffices to make a naive distinction between small and large collections, which can be interpreted as meaning ‘sets’ and ‘proper classes’ respectively. A category A is locally small if A(A, B) is a small collection for each A and B. (Many a ...
RIGID RATIONAL HOMOTOPY THEORY AND
RIGID RATIONAL HOMOTOPY THEORY AND

... Question. Is there a way to ’do algebraic topology on X’ ? More specifically, we can ask if there are cohomology functors H i pXq which is some way behave like the singular cohomology X ÞÑ H i pXpCq, Zq for C-varieties X? Famously, the answer to this question is yes, if one is prepared to work with ...
CLASSIFYING SPACES OF MONOIDS – APPLICATIONS IN
CLASSIFYING SPACES OF MONOIDS – APPLICATIONS IN

Algebraic approach to p-local structure of a finite group: Definition 1
Algebraic approach to p-local structure of a finite group: Definition 1

Mid Term Game - Harrison High School
Mid Term Game - Harrison High School

Algebraic Models for Homotopy Types EPFL July 2013 Exercises 1
Algebraic Models for Homotopy Types EPFL July 2013 Exercises 1

... square, if one arrow is an acyclic cofibration, so is the parallel arrow. (Hint: Use the previous exercise.) 3. Let X be an object in a closed model category and (IX, ∂0 , ∂1 , σ) a cylinder object. Assume that X is cofibrant. (a) Prove that the maps ∂0 : X → IX and ∂1 : X → IX are cofibrations. (b) ...
7. A1 -homotopy theory 7.1. Closed model categories. We begin with
7. A1 -homotopy theory 7.1. Closed model categories. We begin with

... which is the identity on objects and whose set of morphisms from X to Y equals the set of homotopy classes of morphisms from some fibrant/cofibrant replacement of X to some fibrant/cofibrant replacement of Y : HomHo(C) (X, Y ) = π(RQX, RQY ). If F : C → D if a functor with the property that F sends ...
Schnabl
Schnabl

Category Theory for Dummies (I)
Category Theory for Dummies (I)

Filip Najman: Arithmetic geometry (60 HOURS) Arithmetic
Filip Najman: Arithmetic geometry (60 HOURS) Arithmetic

ON TAMAGAWA NUMBERS 1. Adele geometry Let X be an
ON TAMAGAWA NUMBERS 1. Adele geometry Let X be an

THE GEOMETRY OF FORMAL VARIETIES IN ALGEBRAIC
THE GEOMETRY OF FORMAL VARIETIES IN ALGEBRAIC

... geometry. We think of the nilpotent elements of a ring R as being infinitesimal. Relatedly, there’s a very useful category similar to our category of schemes. Let R be a topologized augmented k-algebra whose augmentation ideal I is topologically nilpotent — the category of such objects is called the ...
BASIC DEFINITIONS IN CATEGORY THEORY MATH 250B 1
BASIC DEFINITIONS IN CATEGORY THEORY MATH 250B 1

UIUC Math 347H Lecture 6: Discussion questions Equivalence
UIUC Math 347H Lecture 6: Discussion questions Equivalence

... If also cancellation (C) ALSO holds (ab = ac and a 6= 0 implies b = c) then R is an integral domain. Consider (M5): if a 6= 0 then there is an inverse a−1 such that aa−1 = a−1 a = 1. If (M5) ALSO holds, we say R is a field. 5. Let R = Z[x1 , . . . , xn ] be the set of polynomials with integer coeffi ...
Rational
Rational

What Is...a Topos?, Volume 51, Number 9
What Is...a Topos?, Volume 51, Number 9

... of toposes without points (he has also given criteria for the existence of “enough points”) [SGA 4 IV 7, VI 9]. Moreover, if x and y are points of a topos T , there may exist nontrivial morphisms (of functors) from x to y . In the case of BG , for example, the forgetful functor from BG to {pt} is th ...
Algebraic Number Theory
Algebraic Number Theory

... multiplication and is a commutative division algebra • Other Useful information • Finite group theory • Commutative rings and quotient rings • Elementary number theory ...
Solutions Sheet 3
Solutions Sheet 3

< 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 >

Motive (algebraic geometry)

In algebraic geometry, a motive (or sometimes motif, following French usage) denotes 'some essential part of an algebraic variety'. To date, pure motives have been defined, while conjectural mixed motives have not. Pure motives are triples (X, p, m), where X is a smooth projective variety, p : X ⊢ X is an idempotent correspondence, and m an integer. A morphism from (X, p, m) to (Y, q, n) is given by a correspondence of degree n – m.As far as mixed motives, following Alexander Grothendieck, mathematicians are working to find a suitable definition which will then provide a ""universal"" cohomology theory. In terms of category theory, it was intended to have a definition via splitting idempotents in a category of algebraic correspondences. The way ahead for that definition has been blocked for some decades by the failure to prove the standard conjectures on algebraic cycles. This prevents the category from having 'enough' morphisms, as can currently be shown. While the category of motives was supposed to be the universal Weil cohomology much discussed in the years 1960-1970, that hope for it remains unfulfilled. On the other hand, by a quite different route, motivic cohomology now has a technically adequate definition.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report