• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
REVERSE MATHEMATICS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Second
REVERSE MATHEMATICS Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Second

... Reverse mathematics is a relatively new program in logic with the aim to determine the minimal axiomatic system required to prove theorems. We typically start from axioms A to prove a theorem τ . If we could reverse this to show that the axioms follow from the theorem, then this would demonstrate th ...
Section 3.6: Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition
Section 3.6: Indirect Argument: Contradiction and Contraposition

... So far, we have only considered so called “direct proofs” of mathematical statements. Specifically, we have been given a statement to prove, and then we have used the definitions and previous results to logically derive the statement. In this section we consider “indirect proofs” proofs which do not ...
A Primer on Proving
A Primer on Proving

The First Incompleteness Theorem
The First Incompleteness Theorem

Lecture 10. Model theory. Consistency, independence
Lecture 10. Model theory. Consistency, independence

Oh Yeah? Well, Prove It.
Oh Yeah? Well, Prove It.

Chapter 0 - Ravikumar - Sonoma State University
Chapter 0 - Ravikumar - Sonoma State University

... Definition: A k-regular graph is a graph in which every node has degree k. Theorem: For each even number n greater than 2, there exists a 3-regular graph with n nodes. Although the construction below shows the claim for n = 14, it can be readily generalized. ...
The Diagonal Lemma Fails in Aristotelian Logic
The Diagonal Lemma Fails in Aristotelian Logic

Dialetheic truth theory: inconsistency, non-triviality, soundness, incompleteness
Dialetheic truth theory: inconsistency, non-triviality, soundness, incompleteness

Mathematical Statements and Their Proofs
Mathematical Statements and Their Proofs

Welcome to CS 39 - Dartmouth Computer Science
Welcome to CS 39 - Dartmouth Computer Science

... • Does this make sense? If not, say so now! ...
Review sheet answers
Review sheet answers

Prove
Prove

[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments (§2.3
[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments (§2.3

CHAP03 Induction and Finite Series
CHAP03 Induction and Finite Series

... Is this a coincidence, or will this pattern continue forever? A prime number is one that is bigger than 1 and has no factors other than 1 and itself. The first few prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, … Now notice this pattern. The number 02 + 0 + 41 = 41, which is a prime number. T ...
Inference Tasks and Computational Semantics
Inference Tasks and Computational Semantics

... • If Φ is in fact provable a (sound and complete) 1st-order prover can (in principle) prove it. • Model builder: a tool that, when given a 1storder formula Φ, attempts to build a model for it. • It cannot (even in principle) always succeed in this task, but it can be very useful. ...
m5zn_8a0e185bfba5c83
m5zn_8a0e185bfba5c83

Jacques Herbrand (1908 - 1931) Principal writings in logic
Jacques Herbrand (1908 - 1931) Principal writings in logic

... A Form of Incompleteness A is conjunction of axioms of a theory containing arithmetic. Let ı(p,q,r) formalize: r encodes a numerical interpretation of ES(A,p) that makes the expansion true and assigns the numerical value q to the constant c. œxœy∑zı(x,y,z) expresses the existence, for any p and q, ...
Axioms and Theorems
Axioms and Theorems

Variations on a Montagovian Theme
Variations on a Montagovian Theme

An Introduction to Löb`s Theorem in MIRI Research
An Introduction to Löb`s Theorem in MIRI Research

first order logic
first order logic

10 Inference
10 Inference

Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and Choice principles
Löwenheim-Skolem theorems and Choice principles

i ≤ n
i ≤ n

< 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 >

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two theorems of mathematical logic that establish inherent limitations of all but the most trivial axiomatic systems capable of doing arithmetic. The theorems, proven by Kurt Gödel in 1931, are important both in mathematical logic and in the philosophy of mathematics. The two results are widely, but not universally, interpreted as showing that Hilbert's program to find a complete and consistent set of axioms for all mathematics is impossible, giving a negative answer to Hilbert's second problem.The first incompleteness theorem states that no consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be listed by an ""effective procedure"" (i.e., any sort of algorithm) is capable of proving all truths about the relations of the natural numbers (arithmetic). For any such system, there will always be statements about the natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first, shows that such a system cannot demonstrate its own consistency.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report