• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
ch1_Logic_and_proofs
ch1_Logic_and_proofs

Second-Order Logic and Fagin`s Theorem
Second-Order Logic and Fagin`s Theorem

... Corollary 7.10 Every polynomial-time query is expressible as a second-order, existential Horn formula: P ⊆ SO∃-Horn. The proof of Theorem 7.8 shows that nondeterministic time nk is contained in (SO∃, arity 2k). Lynch improved this to arity k. His proof uses the numeric predicate PLUS. Fagin’s theore ...
Proofs and Proof Methods
Proofs and Proof Methods

arXiv:math/0408107v1 [math.NT] 9 Aug 2004
arXiv:math/0408107v1 [math.NT] 9 Aug 2004

Lecture2-1
Lecture2-1

PROOFS BY INDUCTION AND CONTRADICTION, AND WELL
PROOFS BY INDUCTION AND CONTRADICTION, AND WELL

Notes on Writing Proofs
Notes on Writing Proofs

On Rosser sentences and proof predicates
On Rosser sentences and proof predicates

PARADOX AND INTUITION
PARADOX AND INTUITION

Note 2 - inst.eecs.berkeley.edu
Note 2 - inst.eecs.berkeley.edu

Program Equilibrium in the Prisoner`s Dilemma via Löb`s Theorem
Program Equilibrium in the Prisoner`s Dilemma via Löb`s Theorem

Lecture notes #2 - inst.eecs.berkeley.edu
Lecture notes #2 - inst.eecs.berkeley.edu

... sequence of statements, ending with the proposition being proved, with the property that each statement is either an axiom or its truth follows easily from the fact that the previous statements are true. For example, in high school geometry you may have written two-column proofs where one column lis ...
Lecture notes #2: Proofs - EECS: www
Lecture notes #2: Proofs - EECS: www

Note 2 - EECS: www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu
Note 2 - EECS: www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu

Constructive Set Theory and Brouwerian Principles1
Constructive Set Theory and Brouwerian Principles1

Supplemental Reading (Kunen)
Supplemental Reading (Kunen)

Goldbach`s Conjecture
Goldbach`s Conjecture

3.3 Inference
3.3 Inference

... We then used the definition of even numbers, and our previous parenthetic comment suggests that it was natural for us to use the definition symbolically. The definition tells us that if m is an even number, then there exists another integer i such that m = 2i. We combined this with the assumption that ...
An Independence Result For Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic
An Independence Result For Intuitionistic Bounded Arithmetic

equivalents of the compactness theorem for locally finite sets of
equivalents of the compactness theorem for locally finite sets of

Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 24 (2), 1981 INDEPENDENT SETS OF
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 24 (2), 1981 INDEPENDENT SETS OF

proofs in mathematics
proofs in mathematics

Proof translation for CVC3
Proof translation for CVC3

lecture1.5
lecture1.5

Today`s topics Proof Terminology • Theorem • Axioms
Today`s topics Proof Terminology • Theorem • Axioms

< 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 27 >

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two theorems of mathematical logic that establish inherent limitations of all but the most trivial axiomatic systems capable of doing arithmetic. The theorems, proven by Kurt Gödel in 1931, are important both in mathematical logic and in the philosophy of mathematics. The two results are widely, but not universally, interpreted as showing that Hilbert's program to find a complete and consistent set of axioms for all mathematics is impossible, giving a negative answer to Hilbert's second problem.The first incompleteness theorem states that no consistent system of axioms whose theorems can be listed by an ""effective procedure"" (i.e., any sort of algorithm) is capable of proving all truths about the relations of the natural numbers (arithmetic). For any such system, there will always be statements about the natural numbers that are true, but that are unprovable within the system. The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first, shows that such a system cannot demonstrate its own consistency.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report