Sample pages 1 PDF
... the symbols in themselves, creating thereby a formal language that enables one to talk at once about all structures relevant to a topic. Thus, one distinguishes in this context clearly between denotation and what is denoted. To emphasize this distinction, for instance for A = (A, +, <, 0), it is bet ...
... the symbols in themselves, creating thereby a formal language that enables one to talk at once about all structures relevant to a topic. Thus, one distinguishes in this context clearly between denotation and what is denoted. To emphasize this distinction, for instance for A = (A, +, <, 0), it is bet ...
Section 2.4: Arguments with Quantified Statements
... y = 2m2 is an integer and n = 2 ∗ y, it follows that n2 is an even integer. Note that there we actually excluded a number of steps in this argument (because they were similar to the ones we already stated coming from the elementary rules of arithmetic). In order to make a completely formal argument, ...
... y = 2m2 is an integer and n = 2 ∗ y, it follows that n2 is an even integer. Note that there we actually excluded a number of steps in this argument (because they were similar to the ones we already stated coming from the elementary rules of arithmetic). In order to make a completely formal argument, ...
Review - UT Computer Science
... respect to particular interpretations of interest. One example is Presburger arithmetic, in which the universe is the natural numbers and there is a single function, plus, whose properties are axiomatized. There are other theories that are incomplete because we have not yet added enough axioms. But ...
... respect to particular interpretations of interest. One example is Presburger arithmetic, in which the universe is the natural numbers and there is a single function, plus, whose properties are axiomatized. There are other theories that are incomplete because we have not yet added enough axioms. But ...
Adjointness in Foundations
... As we point out, recursion (at least on the natural numbers) is also characterized entirely by an appropriate adjoint; thus it is possible to give a theory, roughly proof theory of intuitionistic higher-order number theory, in which all important axioms (logical or mathematical) express instances of ...
... As we point out, recursion (at least on the natural numbers) is also characterized entirely by an appropriate adjoint; thus it is possible to give a theory, roughly proof theory of intuitionistic higher-order number theory, in which all important axioms (logical or mathematical) express instances of ...
A course in Mathematical Logic
... Terms and formulas are interpreted in a model. Definition 8. (Definition of a model) Let L be a language. An L-model M is given by a set M of elements (called the universe of the model) and 1. For every function symbol f ∈ L of arity n, a function f M : M n → M ; 2. For every relation symbol R ∈ L o ...
... Terms and formulas are interpreted in a model. Definition 8. (Definition of a model) Let L be a language. An L-model M is given by a set M of elements (called the universe of the model) and 1. For every function symbol f ∈ L of arity n, a function f M : M n → M ; 2. For every relation symbol R ∈ L o ...
Document
... p ↔q denotes “I am at home if and only if it is raining.” If p denotes “You can take the flight.” and q denotes “You buy a ticket.” then p ↔q denotes “You can take the flight if and only ...
... p ↔q denotes “I am at home if and only if it is raining.” If p denotes “You can take the flight.” and q denotes “You buy a ticket.” then p ↔q denotes “You can take the flight if and only ...
Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects
... in case p = q. But if we use a modern-day predicate logic instead of a term logic, distinguish propositions from truth values, and allow the propositional variables ‘p’ and ‘q’ to range over propositions, something like the following principle governing truth values would be assertible for a modern- ...
... in case p = q. But if we use a modern-day predicate logic instead of a term logic, distinguish propositions from truth values, and allow the propositional variables ‘p’ and ‘q’ to range over propositions, something like the following principle governing truth values would be assertible for a modern- ...
PDF
... of symbol manipulation. Believing that is the mistake of formalism.” The first challenge for understanding modern type theory is to understand these higher-order recursive functions. We see here that such an understanding is important even for arithmetic. An interesting course project would be to gi ...
... of symbol manipulation. Believing that is the mistake of formalism.” The first challenge for understanding modern type theory is to understand these higher-order recursive functions. We see here that such an understanding is important even for arithmetic. An interesting course project would be to gi ...
A logical basis for quantum evolution and entanglement
... problem that it could not handle all possible examples of evolution. Several specific examples were given. The problem was that over the course of a system evolving, two particles which had been unentangled can become entangled due to an event that is nonlocal to either. The simple linear logic calc ...
... problem that it could not handle all possible examples of evolution. Several specific examples were given. The problem was that over the course of a system evolving, two particles which had been unentangled can become entangled due to an event that is nonlocal to either. The simple linear logic calc ...
The equational theory of N, 0, 1, +, ×, ↑ is decidable, but not finitely
... Nonetheless, equality in all these structures, even if not finitely axiomatisable, was shown to be decidable [Mac81,Gur85].3 As often happens in number theory, these last results use far more complex tools than simple arithmetic reasoning, as in the case of [HR84], where Nevanlinna theory is used t ...
... Nonetheless, equality in all these structures, even if not finitely axiomatisable, was shown to be decidable [Mac81,Gur85].3 As often happens in number theory, these last results use far more complex tools than simple arithmetic reasoning, as in the case of [HR84], where Nevanlinna theory is used t ...
Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation
... and IIA. Under what condition is the former strictly weaker than the latter? An absolutely minimal condition would be that (or equivalently, ) contains a genuinely molecular formula. With modest auxiliary assumptions, we show that this condition is indeed su¢ cient. Proposition 1 Assume that n 2 and ...
... and IIA. Under what condition is the former strictly weaker than the latter? An absolutely minimal condition would be that (or equivalently, ) contains a genuinely molecular formula. With modest auxiliary assumptions, we show that this condition is indeed su¢ cient. Proposition 1 Assume that n 2 and ...
Logic, deontic. The study of principles of reasoning pertaining to
... ought not to if she doesn't; she has an obligation to operate, which she fails to meet. But attempts to represent these sentences within the standard system yield inconsistencies or redundancies. According to a version of the good Samaritan paradox, Smith's repenting of a murder logically implies hi ...
... ought not to if she doesn't; she has an obligation to operate, which she fails to meet. But attempts to represent these sentences within the standard system yield inconsistencies or redundancies. According to a version of the good Samaritan paradox, Smith's repenting of a murder logically implies hi ...
(pdf)
... Because of this, it makes sense to restrict our questions about the computability of a function to functions from rational numbers to rational numbers. Because of the bijection between natural numbers and rationals, it also makes sense to further restrict the question to functions from the natural n ...
... Because of this, it makes sense to restrict our questions about the computability of a function to functions from rational numbers to rational numbers. Because of the bijection between natural numbers and rationals, it also makes sense to further restrict the question to functions from the natural n ...
Elements of Modal Logic - University of Victoria
... axioms or rules of a logic, even though, properly speaking, these axioms and rules belong to the associated system. We will make immediate use of this loosened terminology. A logic L1 is an extension of a logic L2 when the axioms of L2 are theorems of L1 , and L1 is closed under the rules of L2 . Wh ...
... axioms or rules of a logic, even though, properly speaking, these axioms and rules belong to the associated system. We will make immediate use of this loosened terminology. A logic L1 is an extension of a logic L2 when the axioms of L2 are theorems of L1 , and L1 is closed under the rules of L2 . Wh ...
From p
... Logical implication and the material conditional are both associated with an operation on two logical values, typically the values of two propositions, that produces a value of false just in the singular case the first operand is true and the second operand is false. The truth table associated with ...
... Logical implication and the material conditional are both associated with an operation on two logical values, typically the values of two propositions, that produces a value of false just in the singular case the first operand is true and the second operand is false. The truth table associated with ...
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic Ordinal machines and admissible
... theory. The crucial point involved was how the informally presented recursions in the argument of Sacks and Simpson [11, 12] (and a recursion method presented by Shore [13]) can be implemented by means of computational mechanisms of the generalized Turing machines (see Section 4). We are very thankf ...
... theory. The crucial point involved was how the informally presented recursions in the argument of Sacks and Simpson [11, 12] (and a recursion method presented by Shore [13]) can be implemented by means of computational mechanisms of the generalized Turing machines (see Section 4). We are very thankf ...
A General Proof Method for ... without the Barcan Formula.*
... necessity and possibility, but they can also provide a basis for reasoning about knowledge, belief, time and change, e.g. [Halpern & Moses, 19851. Automated reasoning in modal logics is made difficult, however, by (i) the absence of a normal form for expressions containing modal operators, and (ii) ...
... necessity and possibility, but they can also provide a basis for reasoning about knowledge, belief, time and change, e.g. [Halpern & Moses, 19851. Automated reasoning in modal logics is made difficult, however, by (i) the absence of a normal form for expressions containing modal operators, and (ii) ...
Proof Theory: From Arithmetic to Set Theory
... A first order language L is specified by its non-logical symbols. These symbols are separated into three groups: LC , LF , and LR . LC is the set of constant symbols, LF is the set of function symbols, and LR is the set of relation symbols. Each function symbol f ∈ LF also comes equipped with an ari ...
... A first order language L is specified by its non-logical symbols. These symbols are separated into three groups: LC , LF , and LR . LC is the set of constant symbols, LF is the set of function symbols, and LR is the set of relation symbols. Each function symbol f ∈ LF also comes equipped with an ari ...
Propositional Logic Syntax of Propositional Logic
... Unification in Predicate Logic • The process of finding substitution for variables to make arguments match is called unification. – a substitution is the simultaneous replacement of variable instances by terms, providing a “binding” for the variable – without unification, the matching between rules ...
... Unification in Predicate Logic • The process of finding substitution for variables to make arguments match is called unification. – a substitution is the simultaneous replacement of variable instances by terms, providing a “binding” for the variable – without unification, the matching between rules ...
To What Type of Logic Does the "Tetralemma" Belong?
... above as (1)-(4). It is natural to regard these as of second order since they are in some sense “propositions about propositions”, speaking not just about “first order events”, but about the values of φ on these “events”. [Thus, for example, one might try to symbolize the denial of alternative (3) by ...
... above as (1)-(4). It is natural to regard these as of second order since they are in some sense “propositions about propositions”, speaking not just about “first order events”, but about the values of φ on these “events”. [Thus, for example, one might try to symbolize the denial of alternative (3) by ...
Identity in modal logic theorem proving
... In the realm of modal logics, almost all presentations of the logic of these systems are given in terms of axioms. But no one who is interested in providing automated proofs within modal logic uses an axiomatic system, and so it would therefore seem that all these methods of implementing t h e m mus ...
... In the realm of modal logics, almost all presentations of the logic of these systems are given in terms of axioms. But no one who is interested in providing automated proofs within modal logic uses an axiomatic system, and so it would therefore seem that all these methods of implementing t h e m mus ...
Bounded Functional Interpretation
... elements” from ineffective proofs (in modern parlance, b.f.i. is specially suited for obtaining conservation results). ...
... elements” from ineffective proofs (in modern parlance, b.f.i. is specially suited for obtaining conservation results). ...
A Prologue to the Theory of Deduction
... This reduction of deduction to implication accords well with the point of view, which we mentioned above, where propositions are taken as a more fundamental notion. And this is indeed the point of view of practically all of the philosophy of logic and language in the twentieth century. Propositions ...
... This reduction of deduction to implication accords well with the point of view, which we mentioned above, where propositions are taken as a more fundamental notion. And this is indeed the point of view of practically all of the philosophy of logic and language in the twentieth century. Propositions ...
Analysis of the paraconsistency in some logics
... satisfying, on this paper, Con1, Con2 and Con3 and a set of formulas. We will say that Γ is a theory of L if Γ ⊆ L. We will also say that Γ is closed if it contains all of its consequences (the converse of Con1.) For our purposes, F or is a numerable set of symbols from the language that contains ¬ ...
... satisfying, on this paper, Con1, Con2 and Con3 and a set of formulas. We will say that Γ is a theory of L if Γ ⊆ L. We will also say that Γ is closed if it contains all of its consequences (the converse of Con1.) For our purposes, F or is a numerable set of symbols from the language that contains ¬ ...