@comment -*-texinfo-*- @comment $Id: plumath,v 1.18 2004
... \subseteq N^n$. We call $\ell(S)$ a \textbf{monoid of leading exponents}. There exist $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_m \in N^n$, such that $\ell(S) :=\langle \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_m \rangle$. We define a \textbf{set of leading monomials of $S$} be $L(S) := \{ x^{\alpha} \mid \alpha \in \ell(S) \}\subs ...
... \subseteq N^n$. We call $\ell(S)$ a \textbf{monoid of leading exponents}. There exist $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_m \in N^n$, such that $\ell(S) :=\langle \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_m \rangle$. We define a \textbf{set of leading monomials of $S$} be $L(S) := \{ x^{\alpha} \mid \alpha \in \ell(S) \}\subs ...
The support of local cohomology modules
... theory of local cohomology is to determine for which values of i does the local cohomology module HiI (M ) vanish. This question is both useful and difficult even in the case where R is a regular local ring and M = R, and this case has been studied intensely since the introduction of local cohomolog ...
... theory of local cohomology is to determine for which values of i does the local cohomology module HiI (M ) vanish. This question is both useful and difficult even in the case where R is a regular local ring and M = R, and this case has been studied intensely since the introduction of local cohomolog ...
