
classden
... continuous functions from D to D. This guarantees that any object d ∈ D is also a function d : D → D and hence that it is meaningful to talk about d(d). Scott domains thus support the interpretation of self-application and in fact are essential for the interpretation of functional languages which ar ...
... continuous functions from D to D. This guarantees that any object d ∈ D is also a function d : D → D and hence that it is meaningful to talk about d(d). Scott domains thus support the interpretation of self-application and in fact are essential for the interpretation of functional languages which ar ...
Predicate Calculus - National Taiwan University
... Example 2: S={P(x)∨Q(x),R(z),T(y)∨∼W(y)} There is no constant in S, so we let H0={a} There is no function symbol in S, hence H=H0=H1=…={a} Example 3: S={P(f(x),a,g(y),b)} H0={a,b} H1={a,b,f(a),f(b),g(a),g(b)} H2={a,b,f(a),f(b),g(a),g(b),f(f(a)),f(f(b)),f(g(a)),f(g (b)),g(f(a)),g(f(b)),g(g( ...
... Example 2: S={P(x)∨Q(x),R(z),T(y)∨∼W(y)} There is no constant in S, so we let H0={a} There is no function symbol in S, hence H=H0=H1=…={a} Example 3: S={P(f(x),a,g(y),b)} H0={a,b} H1={a,b,f(a),f(b),g(a),g(b)} H2={a,b,f(a),f(b),g(a),g(b),f(f(a)),f(f(b)),f(g(a)),f(g (b)),g(f(a)),g(f(b)),g(g( ...
Problem_Set_01
... 2. Aristotle’s Proof that the Square Root of Two is Irrational. a. Prove the lemma, used by Aristotle in his proof, which says that if n2 is even, so is n. (Hint: Remember that a b is equivalent to b a). b. Prove that the square root of 3 is irrational using Aristotle’s techniques. Make sure t ...
... 2. Aristotle’s Proof that the Square Root of Two is Irrational. a. Prove the lemma, used by Aristotle in his proof, which says that if n2 is even, so is n. (Hint: Remember that a b is equivalent to b a). b. Prove that the square root of 3 is irrational using Aristotle’s techniques. Make sure t ...
page 135 LOGIC IN WHITEHEAD`S UNIVERSAL ALGEBRA
... class as follows: “A class is a composite entity arising from the togetherness of many things in symmetrical connection with each other [...] A class is a class if its members are “together”, it arises from that composition and any member is as good as any other with respect to membership.” [44] (28 ...
... class as follows: “A class is a composite entity arising from the togetherness of many things in symmetrical connection with each other [...] A class is a class if its members are “together”, it arises from that composition and any member is as good as any other with respect to membership.” [44] (28 ...
On Perfect Introspection with Quantifying-in
... of an agent can be reduced to the objective ones. In ILL88], it was shown that this result holds even if we weaken the logic in the sense that beliefs are not necessarily closed under (classical) logical consequence. In the first-order case, however, we run into problems because of the phenomenon of ...
... of an agent can be reduced to the objective ones. In ILL88], it was shown that this result holds even if we weaken the logic in the sense that beliefs are not necessarily closed under (classical) logical consequence. In the first-order case, however, we run into problems because of the phenomenon of ...
pptx - CSE, IIT Bombay
... • We investigated the applicability of logic as a language for the representation of a number of medical reasoning models. • It was shown that the language of first-order predicate logic allowed for the precise, and compact, representation of these models. • Generally, in translating domain knowledg ...
... • We investigated the applicability of logic as a language for the representation of a number of medical reasoning models. • It was shown that the language of first-order predicate logic allowed for the precise, and compact, representation of these models. • Generally, in translating domain knowledg ...
A simple proof of Parsons` theorem
... they were reformulated in the light of Gödel’s results. Beweistheorie, the mathematical discipline that Hilbert invented to carry out finitistic consistency proofs, eventually redirected its aims and broadened its methods (the reader can find a clear and accessible description of this change of dir ...
... they were reformulated in the light of Gödel’s results. Beweistheorie, the mathematical discipline that Hilbert invented to carry out finitistic consistency proofs, eventually redirected its aims and broadened its methods (the reader can find a clear and accessible description of this change of dir ...
Logic Programming, Functional Programming, and Inductive
... monotone. However, perhaps the database can be partitioned into several inductive definitions, so that each negation refers to a set that has already been defined (the dependency graph must be acyclic). The database can then be interpreted as an iterated inductive definition (via some treatment of f ...
... monotone. However, perhaps the database can be partitioned into several inductive definitions, so that each negation refers to a set that has already been defined (the dependency graph must be acyclic). The database can then be interpreted as an iterated inductive definition (via some treatment of f ...
1 Preliminaries 2 Basic logical and mathematical definitions
... Σ = {Σn }n<ω where Σn is a set which contains the function symbols of arity n (i.e. the symbols which has n arguments). In the following, when no ambiguity arise, we denote by Σ both the family {Σn }n<ω and the set S n<ω {Σn }. Function whose arity is 0 are called also constants. We assume that V, Σ ...
... Σ = {Σn }n<ω where Σn is a set which contains the function symbols of arity n (i.e. the symbols which has n arguments). In the following, when no ambiguity arise, we denote by Σ both the family {Σn }n<ω and the set S n<ω {Σn }. Function whose arity is 0 are called also constants. We assume that V, Σ ...
full text (.pdf)
... The decidability result could also be obtained, with a better decision procedure, by an effective eliminination of quantifiers. In fact, Grandjean has shown that we can do considerably better yet. THEOREM 1.4 (Grandjean, 1982). The decision problem for RANDOM (a) is PSPACE complete (with respect to ...
... The decidability result could also be obtained, with a better decision procedure, by an effective eliminination of quantifiers. In fact, Grandjean has shown that we can do considerably better yet. THEOREM 1.4 (Grandjean, 1982). The decision problem for RANDOM (a) is PSPACE complete (with respect to ...
Hoare Logic, Weakest Liberal Preconditions
... semantics. It would also be possible to prove the validity of the triple using Hoare logic rules, but that would need some auxiliary results. The proof is performed by induction on the structure of statement s. We detail the proof only for the case of the while loop; the other cases are straightforw ...
... semantics. It would also be possible to prove the validity of the triple using Hoare logic rules, but that would need some auxiliary results. The proof is performed by induction on the structure of statement s. We detail the proof only for the case of the while loop; the other cases are straightforw ...
Propositional Logic: Normal Forms
... SAT: if false is NOT marked, let ν be an interpretation that assign true to all marked atoms, and false to the others. If φ is not true under ν, it means that there exists a conjunct P1 ∧ . . . ∧ Pki → P 0 of φ that is false. By the semantics, this can only mean that P1 ∧ . . . ∧ Pki is true but P 0 ...
... SAT: if false is NOT marked, let ν be an interpretation that assign true to all marked atoms, and false to the others. If φ is not true under ν, it means that there exists a conjunct P1 ∧ . . . ∧ Pki → P 0 of φ that is false. By the semantics, this can only mean that P1 ∧ . . . ∧ Pki is true but P 0 ...
Action Logic and Pure Induction
... no finite list of equations of REG from which the rest of REG may be inferred. But in addition to this syntactic problem, REG has a semantic problem. It is not strong enough to constrain a∗ to be the reflexive transitive closure of a. We shall call a reflexive when 1 ≤ a and transitive when aa ≤ a, ...
... no finite list of equations of REG from which the rest of REG may be inferred. But in addition to this syntactic problem, REG has a semantic problem. It is not strong enough to constrain a∗ to be the reflexive transitive closure of a. We shall call a reflexive when 1 ≤ a and transitive when aa ≤ a, ...
Document
... proposi:ons. All but the final proposi:on are called premises. The last statement is the conclusion. • The argument is valid if the premises imply the conclusion. An argument form is an argument that is valid no maMer what proposi:ons are subs:tuted into its proposi:onal variables. • ...
... proposi:ons. All but the final proposi:on are called premises. The last statement is the conclusion. • The argument is valid if the premises imply the conclusion. An argument form is an argument that is valid no maMer what proposi:ons are subs:tuted into its proposi:onal variables. • ...
pdf file
... is the type of proof that most mathematicians would consider complete and rigorous, but that is not strictly formal in the sense of a purely syntactic derivation using a very precise and circumscribed formal set of rules of inference. In other words, I have in mind the type of proof found in a typic ...
... is the type of proof that most mathematicians would consider complete and rigorous, but that is not strictly formal in the sense of a purely syntactic derivation using a very precise and circumscribed formal set of rules of inference. In other words, I have in mind the type of proof found in a typic ...
From proof theory to theories theory
... the idea that the proofs studied by proof theory are proof of mathematical theorems, and thus require a theory, has be given up and proofs have been studied for for their own sake. A typical example is linear logic [24]. The thesis we shall develop in this paper is that there is another possible way ...
... the idea that the proofs studied by proof theory are proof of mathematical theorems, and thus require a theory, has be given up and proofs have been studied for for their own sake. A typical example is linear logic [24]. The thesis we shall develop in this paper is that there is another possible way ...
Logics of Truth - Project Euclid
... the class of propositions the truth predicate obeys the Tar ski criteria. We shall briefly review the theory of Frege structures and use it as a way into the theory of Kripke-Gilmore-Feferman. 1.2 The Kripke-Feferman-Gilmore theory Various approaches to the semantic paradoxes result in some logical ...
... the class of propositions the truth predicate obeys the Tar ski criteria. We shall briefly review the theory of Frege structures and use it as a way into the theory of Kripke-Gilmore-Feferman. 1.2 The Kripke-Feferman-Gilmore theory Various approaches to the semantic paradoxes result in some logical ...
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
... We have defined provability as a property of an argument which depends on the inference rules of a logical proof system. Validity on the other hand is defined by appealing directly to the meanings of formulae and to the circumstances in which they are true or false. In the next lecture we shall look ...
... We have defined provability as a property of an argument which depends on the inference rules of a logical proof system. Validity on the other hand is defined by appealing directly to the meanings of formulae and to the circumstances in which they are true or false. In the next lecture we shall look ...
Can Modalities Save Naive Set Theory?
... fiction. At least on some versions of fictionalism, it’s up to us – it depends on which fiction we choose. We may therefore choose to work in a fiction specified by the axioms of some standard set theory. But fictionalists may also explore more adventurous fictions; in particular, it is an intriguin ...
... fiction. At least on some versions of fictionalism, it’s up to us – it depends on which fiction we choose. We may therefore choose to work in a fiction specified by the axioms of some standard set theory. But fictionalists may also explore more adventurous fictions; in particular, it is an intriguin ...
Clausal Logic and Logic Programming in Algebraic Domains*
... Scott-open U , if x ∈ U then y ∈ U . Furthermore, an element e ∈ D is compact if and only if ↑e is compact open. Example 2.5. In the domain D = [Var → T], a set M is compact open iff it is the set of satisfiers of some propositional formula. The easiest way to see this is to notice that any formula ...
... Scott-open U , if x ∈ U then y ∈ U . Furthermore, an element e ∈ D is compact if and only if ↑e is compact open. Example 2.5. In the domain D = [Var → T], a set M is compact open iff it is the set of satisfiers of some propositional formula. The easiest way to see this is to notice that any formula ...
arXiv:1410.5037v2 [cs.LO] 18 Jun 2016
... and variants of two-variable logic is currently very active. Recent research efforts have mainly concerned decidability and complexity issues in restriction to particular classes of structures and also questions related to different built-in features and operators that increase the expressivity of t ...
... and variants of two-variable logic is currently very active. Recent research efforts have mainly concerned decidability and complexity issues in restriction to particular classes of structures and also questions related to different built-in features and operators that increase the expressivity of t ...
Journey in being show - horizons
... The world view or metaphysics is larger than any other—this is demonstrated It is significantly new and larger than the common views—day-to-day or technical Therefore, although the terms used are common their meanings are significantly altered andor enhanced relative to previous use—this, too, is ...
... The world view or metaphysics is larger than any other—this is demonstrated It is significantly new and larger than the common views—day-to-day or technical Therefore, although the terms used are common their meanings are significantly altered andor enhanced relative to previous use—this, too, is ...
From Syllogism to Common Sense Normal Modal Logic
... ‣ These systems are however mutually incompatible, and no base logic was given of which the other logics are extensions of. ‣ The modal logic K is such a base logic, named after SAUL KRIPKE, and which serves as a minimal logic for the class of all its (normal) extensions - defined next via a Hilbert ...
... ‣ These systems are however mutually incompatible, and no base logic was given of which the other logics are extensions of. ‣ The modal logic K is such a base logic, named after SAUL KRIPKE, and which serves as a minimal logic for the class of all its (normal) extensions - defined next via a Hilbert ...
Slide 1
... Fuzzy Tautologies, Contradictions, Equivalence, and Logical Proofs The extension of truth operations for tautologies, contradictions, equivalence, and logical proofs is no different for fuzzy sets; the results, however, can differ considerably from those in classical logic. If the truth values for ...
... Fuzzy Tautologies, Contradictions, Equivalence, and Logical Proofs The extension of truth operations for tautologies, contradictions, equivalence, and logical proofs is no different for fuzzy sets; the results, however, can differ considerably from those in classical logic. If the truth values for ...