• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CS3234 Logic and Formal Systems
CS3234 Logic and Formal Systems

ppt
ppt

EVALUATING INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
EVALUATING INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

... Since the quality of the support for the conclusion of an inductive argument is based upon the quality of the sample, the strength of the argument is based on how well the sample represents the group referred to in the conclusion. For example, for an argument about students who do well in logic to b ...
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC Lecture 6 Natural Deduction Proofs in
INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC Lecture 6 Natural Deduction Proofs in

... The occurrence of a sentence φ with no sentence above it is an assumption. An assumption of φ is a proof of φ. This may seem odd. Suppose I assume, the following: ∃x∃y(Rxy ∨ P ) By the rule, this counts as a proof of ∃x∃y(Rxy ∨ P ) But it is not an outright proof of ∃x∃y(Rxy ∨ P ) This proof does no ...
PDF
PDF

Natural Deduction Calculus for Quantified Propositional Linear
Natural Deduction Calculus for Quantified Propositional Linear

Lesson 2
Lesson 2

... A set of formulas {A1,…,An} is satisfiable iff there is a valuation v such that v is a model of every formula Ai, i = 1,...,n. The valuation v is then a model of the set {A1,…,An}. Mathematical Logic ...
1. Kripke`s semantics for modal logic
1. Kripke`s semantics for modal logic

pdf file
pdf file

Is the principle of contradiction a consequence of ? Jean
Is the principle of contradiction a consequence of ? Jean

... didn’t like it and kept using the traditional lining-device. This way of writing (lining-device, italic/non-italic fonts, label) derivations of equations was developed before Boole during the 18th century and has been preserved up to now independently of the development of mathematical logic (showin ...
Exam-Computational_Logic-Subjects_2016
Exam-Computational_Logic-Subjects_2016

Propositional Logic
Propositional Logic

Slides - UCSD CSE
Slides - UCSD CSE

January 12
January 12

A + B + C
A + B + C

... In POS standard form, every variable in the domain must appear in each sum term of the expression. You can expand a nonstandard POS expression to standard form by adding the product of the missing variable and its complement and applying rule 12, which states that (A + B)(A + C) = A + BC. Convert X ...
An Introduction to Lower Bounds on Formula
An Introduction to Lower Bounds on Formula

... properties of Kripke frames and models. To put things in perspective, I am going to start by giving an informal overview of some techniques used for proving lower bounds on the size of Boolean formulae and then I am going to show how to extend and apply them in the modal case where we have obtained ...
September 4
September 4

... Since first-order logic is supposed to be our most austere, canonical language, there does seem to be a real difference between existence and predication. Still, we should not necessarily follow Kant on the basis of first-order logic. Formal systems can be constructed with all sorts of properties. W ...
ch1_Logic_and_proofs
ch1_Logic_and_proofs

[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments (§2.3
[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments (§2.3

4 slides/page
4 slides/page

Tautologies Arguments Logical Implication
Tautologies Arguments Logical Implication

Jean Van Heijenoort`s View of Modern Logic
Jean Van Heijenoort`s View of Modern Logic

... “Modern logic began in 1879, the year in which Gottlob Frege (1848–1925) published his Begriffsschrift.” p. 242, Jean van Heijenoort, “Historical Development of Modern Logic”, Modern Logic 2, 242–255. [Prepared by Irving H. Anellis from a previously unpublished typescript of 1974.] ...
(formal) logic? - Departamento de Informática
(formal) logic? - Departamento de Informática

... What is a (formal) logic? Logic is defined as the study of the principles of reasoning. One of its branches is symbolic logic, that studies formal logic. A formal logic is a language equipped with rules for deducing the truth of one sentence from that of another. A logic consists of ...
slides
slides

Logic - Mathematical Institute SANU
Logic - Mathematical Institute SANU

... of argumentation in general belongs more to rhetoric than to logic, and is far less systematic and exact. Even further removed from the science of logic considered here, there are various philosophical endeavours that share with logic not much more than the name, such as, for example, the logic of s ...
< 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 >

Syllogism

A syllogism (Greek: συλλογισμός syllogismos, ""conclusion, inference"") is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.In its earliest form, defined by Aristotle, from the combination of a general statement (the major premise) and a specific statement (the minor premise), a conclusion is deduced. For example, knowing that all men are mortal (major premise) and that Socrates is a man (minor premise), we may validly conclude that Socrates is mortal. Syllogistic arguments are usually represented in a three-line form (without sentence-terminating periods):All men are mortalSocrates is a manTherefore, Socrates is mortal
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report