relevant reasoning as the logical basis of
... extensional notion of material implication (denoted by → in this paper) which is defined as A→B =df ¬(A∧¬B) or A→B =df ¬A∨B. However, the material implication is just a truth-function of its antecedent and consequent but not requires that there must exist a necessarily relevant and/or conditional re ...
... extensional notion of material implication (denoted by → in this paper) which is defined as A→B =df ¬(A∧¬B) or A→B =df ¬A∨B. However, the material implication is just a truth-function of its antecedent and consequent but not requires that there must exist a necessarily relevant and/or conditional re ...
Nelson`s Strong Negation, Safe Beliefs and the - CEUR
... Since it was introduced in [3], strong negation has been well accepted in the answer set programming community2 . However, this connective has not received a fair treatment. While the answer set semantics has been extended to always more flexible classes of logic programs where conjunctions, disjunc ...
... Since it was introduced in [3], strong negation has been well accepted in the answer set programming community2 . However, this connective has not received a fair treatment. While the answer set semantics has been extended to always more flexible classes of logic programs where conjunctions, disjunc ...
On Elkan`s theorems: Clarifying their meaning
... omitted from the first version of Elkan’s theorem. As to the rest of the assumptions, both t~A ∧ B! ⫽ min$t~A!, t~B!% and t~¬A! ⫽ 1 ⫺ t~A! are quite reasonable and, in fact, are often used in applications of fuzzy logic. Let us now concentrate on the last assumption, that is, on t~A! ⫽ t~B! if A and ...
... omitted from the first version of Elkan’s theorem. As to the rest of the assumptions, both t~A ∧ B! ⫽ min$t~A!, t~B!% and t~¬A! ⫽ 1 ⫺ t~A! are quite reasonable and, in fact, are often used in applications of fuzzy logic. Let us now concentrate on the last assumption, that is, on t~A! ⫽ t~B! if A and ...
