• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
CHAPTER 1 The main subject of Mathematical Logic is
CHAPTER 1 The main subject of Mathematical Logic is

... negation as A → ⊥. To embed classical logic, we need to go further and add as an axiom schema the principle of indirect proof, also called stability (∀~x (¬¬R~x → R~x ) for relation symbols R), but then it is appropriate to restrict to the language based on →, ∀, ⊥ and ∧. The reason for this restric ...
1 Chapter III Set Theory as a Theory of First Order Predicate Logic
1 Chapter III Set Theory as a Theory of First Order Predicate Logic

... one of the trickiest abstract concepts there are, and this applies to the phrase "ad infinitum", as it figures in our informal description of the cumulative hierarchy, no less than to any other manifestation of it. Set Theory was invented in large part to analyse the concept of infinity, and to deve ...
POSSIBLE WORLDS SEMANTICS AND THE LIAR Reflections on a
POSSIBLE WORLDS SEMANTICS AND THE LIAR Reflections on a

... Now, Kaplan’s argument shows that the principle of plenitude is incompatible with assumptions commonly made in possible worlds semantics. Here is how the argument goes: (i) There is a set W of possible worlds and a set P rop of propositions. (ii) There is, for every subset X of W , a corresponding p ...
Document
Document

... that’s always false –a contradiction. EG: p  ¬p On the other hand, a compound proposition whose truth value isn’t constant is called a contingency. EG: p  ¬p ...
Intuitionistic modal logic made explicit
Intuitionistic modal logic made explicit

Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Linear Temporal Logic
Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Linear Temporal Logic

... The correspondence between M and Mϕ Proposition 6 Let s be a behaviour in M . Let ∆i = {ψ ∈ Cl(ϕ) : σs , i |= ψ}, i < ω. Then hs0 , ∆0 ihs1 , ∆1 i . . . hsn , ∆n i . . . is a behaviour in Mϕ and σs , i |= ψ is equivalent to hs0 , ∆0 ihs1 , ∆1 i . . . hsn , ∆n i . . . , i |= ψ for all ψ ∈ Cl(ϕ) and ...
MoggiMonads.pdf
MoggiMonads.pdf

... considered in [Plo75] for call-by-value and call-by-name operational equivalence. This approach was later extended, following a similar methodology, to consider other features of computations like nondeterminism (see [Sha84]), side-effects and continuations (see [FFKD86, FF89]). The calculi based on ...
PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK
PowerPoint file for CSL 02, Edinburgh, UK

... E.g. Nakata & Hayashi used “partial guessing functions”, which are rarely ...
Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation

Proof theory of witnessed G¨odel logic: a
Proof theory of witnessed G¨odel logic: a

Lesson 12
Lesson 12

... The relation of provability (A1,...,An |– A) and the relation of logical entailment (A1,...,An |= A) are distinct relations. Similarly, the set of theorems |– A (of a calculus) is generally not identical to the set of logically valid formulas |= A. The former is a syntactic issue and defined within ...
Algebraic Representation of Syntagmatic Structures
Algebraic Representation of Syntagmatic Structures

Finite Model Theory
Finite Model Theory

... infinite structures and most of model theory is based on methods that take infiniteness of structures for granted. In that context finite models are anomalies that deserve only marginal attention. Finite model theory arose as an independent field of logic from consideration of problems in theoretica ...
Chapter 2, Logic
Chapter 2, Logic

... resembling a horse but with a single horn projecting from the middle of its forehead’ we could confidently assert ‘any unicorn has four legs’ but should not think ourselves thereby committed to the existence of any unicorns, so we should reject the inference from ‘all unicorn have four legs’ to ‘som ...
A constructive approach to nonstandard analysis*
A constructive approach to nonstandard analysis*

... Intuitionisti~ arithmetic in all finite types, HA”, suffices to formalize elementary parts of constructive analysis (cf. the discussion in [7]). The theory contains function types, such as the type of all functions on natural numbers, and the type of functions on this type, and so on. In particular, ...
Sentences PPT Student Version
Sentences PPT Student Version

Document
Document

... SUBJECT and a PREDICATE (verb)…no matter how big or small it is. I ran. ...
Mathematical Logic Fall 2004 Professor R. Moosa Contents
Mathematical Logic Fall 2004 Professor R. Moosa Contents

A. Formal systems, Proof calculi
A. Formal systems, Proof calculi

(A B) |– A
(A B) |– A

... The relation of provability (A1,...,An |– A) and the relation of logical entailment (A1,...,An |= A) are distinct relations. Similarly, the set of theorems |– A (of a calculus) is generally not identical to the set of logically valid formulas |= A. The former is a syntactic issue and defined within ...
Tactical and Strategic Challenges to Logic (KAIST
Tactical and Strategic Challenges to Logic (KAIST

... This would be a good time to ask, “How do logicians think that the rational and practicable management of such systems should be brought about”? In shorter words, what is to be learned about these things from logic? The answer to date is “not much”. I’ll turn to that a section from now. First we’ll ...
Supplemental Reading (Kunen)
Supplemental Reading (Kunen)

Slide 1
Slide 1

... contradictions, equivalence, and logical proofs is no different for fuzzy sets; the results, however, can differ considerably from those in classical logic. If the truth values for the simple propositions of a fuzzy logic compound proposition are strictly true (1) or false (0), the results follow id ...
Week 3: Logical Language
Week 3: Logical Language

De Jongh`s characterization of intuitionistic propositional calculus
De Jongh`s characterization of intuitionistic propositional calculus

< 1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 38 >

Interpretation (logic)

An interpretation is an assignment of meaning to the symbols of a formal language. Many formal languages used in mathematics, logic, and theoretical computer science are defined in solely syntactic terms, and as such do not have any meaning until they are given some interpretation. The general study of interpretations of formal languages is called formal semantics.The most commonly studied formal logics are propositional logic, predicate logic and their modal analogs, and for these there are standard ways of presenting an interpretation. In these contexts an interpretation is a function that provides the extension of symbols and strings of symbols of an object language. For example, an interpretation function could take the predicate T (for ""tall"") and assign it the extension {a} (for ""Abraham Lincoln""). Note that all our interpretation does is assign the extension {a} to the non-logical constant T, and does not make a claim about whether T is to stand for tall and 'a' for Abraham Lincoln. Nor does logical interpretation have anything to say about logical connectives like 'and', 'or' and 'not'. Though we may take these symbols to stand for certain things or concepts, this is not determined by the interpretation function.An interpretation often (but not always) provides a way to determine the truth values of sentences in a language. If a given interpretation assigns the value True to a sentence or theory, the interpretation is called a model of that sentence or theory.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report