
Transportability and Generality in a Natural-Language
... the domain (the d a t a b a s e e x p e r t or D B E ) answers questions about the database and the linguistic expressions used to refer to the information it contains, and then end-users can use it to answer natural-language queries from the application. Figure 1 shows the major components of T E A ...
... the domain (the d a t a b a s e e x p e r t or D B E ) answers questions about the database and the linguistic expressions used to refer to the information it contains, and then end-users can use it to answer natural-language queries from the application. Figure 1 shows the major components of T E A ...
Rich Chapter 5 Predicate Logic - Computer Science
... These examples illustrate two points. The first is fairly specific. It is that, although class and superclass memberships are important facts that need to be represented, those memberships need not be represented with predicates labeled instance and isa. In fact, in a logical framework it is usually ...
... These examples illustrate two points. The first is fairly specific. It is that, although class and superclass memberships are important facts that need to be represented, those memberships need not be represented with predicates labeled instance and isa. In fact, in a logical framework it is usually ...
Completeness in modal logic - Lund University Publications
... ordered triple < W, R, V > where W and R are as before, and V is an assignment of the truthvalues 1 and 0 to each atomic formula at every world in W. A formula Φ is true in a model iff it has value 1 in every world in W for some valuation V. Φ is valid in a frame iff it is true in every model based ...
... ordered triple < W, R, V > where W and R are as before, and V is an assignment of the truthvalues 1 and 0 to each atomic formula at every world in W. A formula Φ is true in a model iff it has value 1 in every world in W for some valuation V. Φ is valid in a frame iff it is true in every model based ...
A really temporal logic
... TPTL, employs a novel quantifier construct for referencing time: the freeze quantifier variable to the time of the local temporal context. TPTL is both a natural language for specification and a suitable present a tableau-based decision procedure and a model-checking ...
... TPTL, employs a novel quantifier construct for referencing time: the freeze quantifier variable to the time of the local temporal context. TPTL is both a natural language for specification and a suitable present a tableau-based decision procedure and a model-checking ...
Chapter 2 Propositional Logic
... Why the greek letters in clause ii)? Well, it wouldn’t be right to phrase it, for example, in the following way: “if P and Q are wffs, then ∼P and (P →Q) are also wffs”. That would be too narrow, for it would apply only in the case of the sentence letters P and Q. It wouldn’t apply to any other sent ...
... Why the greek letters in clause ii)? Well, it wouldn’t be right to phrase it, for example, in the following way: “if P and Q are wffs, then ∼P and (P →Q) are also wffs”. That would be too narrow, for it would apply only in the case of the sentence letters P and Q. It wouldn’t apply to any other sent ...
Introduction to Syntax Level 1 Course
... Patterns, the sentence formula is arranged in the unmarked word order. • If we look at all the word order alternations of a sentence as a set of options (=a category), one of the members of this set is unmarked. • Unmarked word order is the word order which is most widely used, and which ...
... Patterns, the sentence formula is arranged in the unmarked word order. • If we look at all the word order alternations of a sentence as a set of options (=a category), one of the members of this set is unmarked. • Unmarked word order is the word order which is most widely used, and which ...
Scharp on Replacing Truth
... one often attempts to identify some feature of the liar sentence that is shared by other problematic instances of T (instances involving the Curry sentence, liar pairs, Yablo’s paradox, and so on), but not shared with the unproblematic instances of T (instances such as ‘snow is white’, ‘1+1 = 5’ and ...
... one often attempts to identify some feature of the liar sentence that is shared by other problematic instances of T (instances involving the Curry sentence, liar pairs, Yablo’s paradox, and so on), but not shared with the unproblematic instances of T (instances such as ‘snow is white’, ‘1+1 = 5’ and ...
Mathematical Logic. An Introduction
... An n-ary relation symbol is intended to denote an n-ary relation; an n-ary function symbol is intended to denote an n-ary function. A symbol set is sometimes called a type because it describes the type of structures which will later interpret the symbols. We shall denote variables by letters like x, ...
... An n-ary relation symbol is intended to denote an n-ary relation; an n-ary function symbol is intended to denote an n-ary function. A symbol set is sometimes called a type because it describes the type of structures which will later interpret the symbols. We shall denote variables by letters like x, ...
Using Existential Graphs for Automated Theorem Proving
... • In ATP, one tries to come up with procedures that check whether some statement (the conclusion, or theorem) logically follows from (is logically entailed by; is a logical consequence of) a set of statements = {1 , , n} (the premises, or axioms). • In this definition, ‘logically’ means ‘acc ...
... • In ATP, one tries to come up with procedures that check whether some statement (the conclusion, or theorem) logically follows from (is logically entailed by; is a logical consequence of) a set of statements = {1 , , n} (the premises, or axioms). • In this definition, ‘logically’ means ‘acc ...
3.6 First-Order Tableau
... interpretation A0 that is identical to A, except cA = a for the fresh constant c of the δ(c) descendant. The constant c does not occur in (φ1 , . . . , ψ, . . . , φn ), so A0 |= φ1 ∧ . . . ∧ ψ ∧ . . . ∧ φn and by construction A0 |= ψ 0 , for the δ(c) descendant ψ 0 . The case ψ = ¬∀xS .χ can be show ...
... interpretation A0 that is identical to A, except cA = a for the fresh constant c of the δ(c) descendant. The constant c does not occur in (φ1 , . . . , ψ, . . . , φn ), so A0 |= φ1 ∧ . . . ∧ ψ ∧ . . . ∧ φn and by construction A0 |= ψ 0 , for the δ(c) descendant ψ 0 . The case ψ = ¬∀xS .χ can be show ...