• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AS TRUTH-PRESERVATION STEPHEN READ Abstract
LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE AS TRUTH-PRESERVATION STEPHEN READ Abstract

... What these proofs show is that, if we suppose that 3 represents implication (real implication), then an impossible proposition implies any proposition, and if ⊃ represents implication, even a false proposition implies any other. Neither proof shows that these are sound principles about implication. ...
Quadripartitaratio - Revistas Científicas de la Universidad de
Quadripartitaratio - Revistas Científicas de la Universidad de

slides - Computer and Information Science
slides - Computer and Information Science

... • If there are n different atomic propositions in some formula, then there are different lines in the truth table for that formula. (This is because each proposition can take one 1of 2 values—i.e., true or false.) • Let us write T for truth, and F for falsity. Then the truth table for p q is: ...
Syllogisms and Fallacies 101
Syllogisms and Fallacies 101

... It basically asserts two commonplaces, that peas are good for you and that you should eat what’s good for you. If both premises are true in this case, then the conclusion follows. The only way to establish a fallacy here would be to disprove one of the premises. Enthymeme: No snakes have fur because ...
Propositional Logic and Methods of Inference
Propositional Logic and Methods of Inference

... symbols of logic, which is the study of the rules of exact reasoning. Logic is also of primary importance in expert systems in which the inference engine reasons from facts to conclusions. A descriptive term for logic programming and expert systems is automated reasoning systems. ...
Logic and Proofs1 1 Overview. 2 Sentential Connectives.
Logic and Proofs1 1 Overview. 2 Sentential Connectives.

... The symbols ∀ (“for all” or “for every”) and ∃ (“there exists”) are quantifiers. There are a number of important subtleties involving quantifiers. The first subtlety is that, in the math that we will be using, a sentence is well formulated only if every variable is bound by a quantifier. In practice ...
Chapter 15 Logic Name Date Objective: Students will use
Chapter 15 Logic Name Date Objective: Students will use

... Propositions are statements that may be true or false. Propositions may be indeterminate - a proposition that is not certain. Notations used for propositions Letters such as p, q, and r are used to represent propositions. ...
logical axiom
logical axiom

... ponens”, which states that from formulas A and A → B, one my deduce B. It is easy to see that this rule preserves logical validity. The axioms, together with modus ponens, form a sound deductive system for the classical propositional logic. In addition, it is also complete. Note that in the above se ...
p q
p q

... Common phrasings for the biconditional • p if and only if q • p is necessary and equivalent for q • p is equivalent to q ...
Logic and Proof
Logic and Proof

... rise to contradiction (someone loves and does not loves Jill). • We must demonstrate that our specification does not draw the wrong inferences. • We must demonstrate that what we claim holds in the specification does hold. • The demonstration should be given as a proof, which is a systematic way to ...
Propositional Logic
Propositional Logic

... Reasoning about problems ...
CPS130, Lecture 1: Introduction to Algorithms
CPS130, Lecture 1: Introduction to Algorithms

... theorems are sometimes called lemmas or propositions and immediate consequences of theorems are sometimes called corollaries. Sometimes hypotheses are only implicitly stated; for example, they may be a basic property of the integers when proving something in that context. A valid argument is one suc ...
Notes - Conditional Statements and Logic.notebook
Notes - Conditional Statements and Logic.notebook

... A counterexample is one example that can  prove an entire statement false. Example: If a number is prime, then it is an odd  number. Counterexample:  ...
Mathematical Logic
Mathematical Logic

... Learning Objectives • Learn how to use logical connectives to combine statements • Explore how to draw conclusions using various argument forms • Become familiar with quantifiers and predicates • Learn various proof techniques • Explore what an algorithm is dww-logic ...
The Discovery of the Computer
The Discovery of the Computer

... expressed in a logical system is true or false, without producing all the possible theorems of the system. This so-called “decision problem” was answered by Alan Turing, who showed that it is not possible to decide if any theorem is true or false. In doing this, he discovered the computer. The story ...
ch1_Logic_and_proofs
ch1_Logic_and_proofs

... 2. Show that ~p is also true. 3. Then we have that p ^ (~p) is true. 4. But this is impossible, since the statement p ^ (~p) is always false. There is a contradiction! 5. So, q cannot be false and therefore it is true. ...
Intuitionistic Logic
Intuitionistic Logic

... disproof of p. But being able to disprove the possibility of a disproof of p isn’t itself a proof of p. Notice that the clauses for conjunction and disjunction (and, in quantification theory, ∃) are classical. The fragment of intuitionistic logic consisting just of ∧ and ∨ is identical to a similar ...
Part3
Part3

... Example: Suppose that two people play a game taking turns removing, 1, 2, or 3 stones at a time from a pile that begins with 15 stones. The person who removes the last stone wins the game. Show that the first player can win the game no matter what the second player does. Proof: Let n be the last ste ...
CS173: Discrete Math
CS173: Discrete Math

... • P: “you can take the flight”, q: “you buy a ticket” • P  q: “You can take the flight if and only if you buy a ticket” – This statement is true • If you buy a ticket and take the flight • If you do not buy a ticket and you cannot take the flight ...
Argumentations and logic
Argumentations and logic

... later realize that they had not settled it at all. Some propositions thought to be known to be true are not really known to be true. In fact, some of them are false. Some propositions thought to be known to be false are not really known to be false. In fact, some of them are true. Hypotheses excite ...
Sample Exam 1 - Moodle
Sample Exam 1 - Moodle

... CSC 4-151 Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Exam 1 May 7, 2017 ____________________ name For credit on these problems, you must show your work. On this exam, take the natural numbers to be N = {0,1,2,3, …}. 1. (6 pts.) State and prove one of DeMorgan’s Laws for propositional logic, using a t ...
p q
p q

... proposition p, axioms and proven theorems so that the truth of proposition q is obtained. Example: For all real numbers d, d1, d2, and x, if d=min{d1,d2} and xd, then xd1 and xd2. Proof. From the definition of min, it follows that dd1 and dd2. From xd and dd1, we may derive xd1 by the transi ...
Rhetorical Analysis
Rhetorical Analysis

... Syntax (choices in sentence lengths and structure—short, choppy sentences to deliver emphatic, powerful convictions? Or long, fluid sentences to deliver a ...
Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering
Mathematics for Computer Science/Software Engineering

... Heuristic justification for this definition: if p is true and q is false, then the statement ‘if p is true then q is true’ obviously cannot be true, and therefore must be false. On the other hand, if p is false, then the statement ‘if p is true then ...’ is an empty statement—it is saying nothing at ...
Geometry Notes 2.2 Logic Determining Truths Values
Geometry Notes 2.2 Logic Determining Truths Values

... Geometry Notes 2.2 Logic Determining Truths Values 1. __________________________ - a sentence that is either true or false A. _______________________ of a statement is either true or false (determining if it is true or false) B. Statements are represented by letters ___ and ____, ____ Example: p: A ...
< 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 32 >

Argument

In logic and philosophy, an argument is a series of statements typically used to persuade someone of something or to present reasons for accepting a conclusion. The general form of an argument in a natural language is that of premises (typically in the form of propositions, statements or sentences) in support of a claim: the conclusion. The structure of some arguments can also be set out in a formal language, and formally defined ""arguments"" can be made independently of natural language arguments, as in math, logic, and computer science.In a typical deductive argument, the premises are meant to provide a guarantee of the truth of the conclusion, while in an inductive argument, they are thought to provide reasons supporting the conclusion's probable truth. The standards for evaluating non-deductive arguments may rest on different or additional criteria than truth, for example, the persuasiveness of so-called ""indispensability claims"" in transcendental arguments, the quality of hypotheses in retroduction, or even the disclosure of new possibilities for thinking and acting.The standards and criteria used in evaluating arguments and their forms of reasoning are studied in logic. Ways of formulating arguments effectively are studied in rhetoric (see also: argumentation theory). An argument in a formal language shows the logical form of the symbolically represented or natural language arguments obtained by its interpretations.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report