• Study Resource
  • Explore Categories
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
Advanced Microeconomics (ES30025)
Advanced Microeconomics (ES30025)

... These specify the order of play, the information and choices available to every player when it is his turn to play, the payoffs to the players, and (sometimes) the probability of moves by nature – see Figure 1: Note: Each ‘node’ represents a point in the game where a player needs to make a decision. ...
Evolutionary Game Theory and Population Dynamics
Evolutionary Game Theory and Population Dynamics

... In Chapter 8, we discuss populations with random matching of players in well-mixed populations. We review recent results concerning the dependence of the long-run behavior of such systems on the number of players and the noise level. In the case of two-player games with two symmetric Nash equilibria ...
The possible and the impossible in multi-agent learning
The possible and the impossible in multi-agent learning

... events that have positive probability under their actual joint behavior. This is the absolute continuity condition [2,15]. So far we have said nothing about what determines agents’ behavior, only what it means for them to learn. In game theory, a standard assumption is that behavior is rational: at ...
mechanism design
mechanism design

... v, ) (standard definitions apply; see book for details) with full performance (x, p). Then the expected payoff satisfy Vi() = Vi(0) + Ei[z(t) | ti=s] (dvi/ds) ds. Prepared for MICT PhD course, Department of Economics, UCL by Daniel Rogger, UCL PhD candidate ...
gameth1, October 4, 2001 - latest version
gameth1, October 4, 2001 - latest version

Solution Concepts
Solution Concepts

... is uncertain about others’ strategies. So this seems a bit different than mixed NE if one views a mixed strategy as an explicit randomization in behavior by each agent i. However, another view of mixed NE if that it’s not i’s actual choice that matters, but j’s beliefs about i’s choice. On this accou ...
REPEATED GAMES WITH PRIVATE MONITORING: TWO PLAYERS
REPEATED GAMES WITH PRIVATE MONITORING: TWO PLAYERS

Evolutionary game theory, interpersonal comparisons and natural
Evolutionary game theory, interpersonal comparisons and natural

... T. Grüne-Yanoff (&) Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, ...
Evolutionary game theory, interpersonal comparisons and natural
Evolutionary game theory, interpersonal comparisons and natural

... T. Grüne-Yanoff (&) Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, ...
The Population Dynamics of Conflict and Cooperation
The Population Dynamics of Conflict and Cooperation

... densities are 0; and the restriction of (1) to a face is again an ecological equation. If the fi are affine linear, we obtain – as simplest example – the Lotka-Volterra equation X ẋi = xi (ri + aij xj ) ...
PDF file of preprint
PDF file of preprint

... For much of its history, game theory has been pursuing an enormously ambitious research program. Its aim has been nothing less than to describe equilibrium outcomes for every game. This involves not only a specification of each player’s behaviour or choice of strategy, but also of what beliefs or exp ...
S - Webcourse
S - Webcourse

Prisoner`s Dilemma with Talk∗
Prisoner`s Dilemma with Talk∗

... Standard game theory tends to ignore the fact that in strategic situations people often have the opportunity to communicate before choosing their actions. When communication is included it is taken to be “cheap talk” that does not oblige the players in any way. However there are situations where com ...
Game Theory - Maskin Notes 2013
Game Theory - Maskin Notes 2013

1 Eon 5300: The in-class example of using the One-stage
1 Eon 5300: The in-class example of using the One-stage

... A strategy profile (a combination of strategies, one for each player) is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium if and only if no player has an incentive to deviate in a single stage or subgame and conform to his original strategy thereafter. In order to show that the OSDP can be a useful proof techniqu ...
locally
locally

pptx - Cornell
pptx - Cornell

... Strategies: the set of actions players can use. Payoffs: the amount each player gets for every possible combination of the players’ strategies. Solution or equilibrium concept: a way you reason that players select strategies to play, and then consequently how you predict the outcome of the game. ...
A note on pre-play communication
A note on pre-play communication

... Farrell, Lo, Rabin, Schlag and Vida and I all make assumptions designed to capture the idea that the meaning that messages have outside of a strategic encounter could determine how they are interpreted within game. All of the approaches make the constraints sufficiently weak so that agents can still m ...
Computing Stackelberg Strategies in Stochastic
Computing Stackelberg Strategies in Stochastic

... For computing approximate correlated equilibria of a stochastic game (without commitment), an algorithm called QPACE [MacDermed et al. 2011] is available. It turns out that if we allow for the type of signaling discussed in the previous section, then QPACE can be modified to compute an optimal strat ...
Homogeneous Product Oligopoly
Homogeneous Product Oligopoly

On the computational complexity of evolution
On the computational complexity of evolution

A Game Theory Approach to Policy-Making
A Game Theory Approach to Policy-Making

... no subgame perfect equilibria, due to the non-credibility of the threats. In terms of the welfare outcome, however, this equilibrium is obviously not optimal. One of the possible negative outcomes is inefficiency in the traffic flow. The other, more dangerous one is injury. This is because the pedes ...
Lecture 17
Lecture 17

Computing the Optimal Strategy to Commit to
Computing the Optimal Strategy to Commit to

... games. We give both positive results (efficient algorithms) and negative results (NP-hardness results). ...
Learning and Belief Based Trade - David Levine`s Economic and
Learning and Belief Based Trade - David Levine`s Economic and

... In addition, we show that not even self-confirming equilibrium is needed for the no-trade conclusion. Specifically, while the steady states of standard learning processes must be self-confirming equilibrium, there is no guarantee that even well-behaved learning procedures necessarily converge to a s ...
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 16 >

Prisoner's dilemma

The prisoner's dilemma is a standard example of a game analyzed in game theory that shows why two completely ""rational"" individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to do so. It was originally framed by Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher working at RAND in 1950. Albert W. Tucker formalized the game with prison sentence rewards and named it, ""prisoner's dilemma"" (Poundstone, 1992), presenting it as follows:Two members of a criminal gang are arrested and imprisoned. Each prisoner is in solitary confinement with no means of communicating with the other. The prosecutors lack sufficient evidence to convict the pair on the principal charge. They hope to get both sentenced to a year in prison on a lesser charge. Simultaneously, the prosecutors offer each prisoner a bargain. Each prisoner is given the opportunity either to: betray the other by testifying that the other committed the crime, or to cooperate with the other by remaining silent. The offer is: If A and B each betray the other, each of them serves 2 years in prison If A betrays B but B remains silent, A will be set free and B will serve 3 years in prison (and vice versa) If A and B both remain silent, both of them will only serve 1 year in prison (on the lesser charge)It is implied that the prisoners will have no opportunity to reward or punish their partner other than the prison sentences they get, and that their decision will not affect their reputation in the future. Because betraying a partner offers a greater reward than cooperating with him, all purely rational self-interested prisoners would betray the other, and so the only possible outcome for two purely rational prisoners is for them to betray each other. The interesting part of this result is that pursuing individual reward logically leads both of the prisoners to betray, when they would get a better reward if they both kept silent. In reality, humans display a systematic bias towards cooperative behavior in this and similar games, much more so than predicted by simple models of ""rational"" self-interested action. A model based on a different kind of rationality, where people forecast how the game would be played if they formed coalitions and then they maximize their forecasts, has been shown to make better predictions of the rate of cooperation in this and similar games given only the payoffs of the game.An extended ""iterated"" version of the game also exists, where the classic game is played repeatedly between the same prisoners, and consequently, both prisoners continuously have an opportunity to penalize the other for previous decisions. If the number of times the game will be played is known to the players, then (by backward induction) two classically rational players will betray each other repeatedly, for the same reasons as the single shot variant. In an infinite or unknown length game there is no fixed optimum strategy, and Prisoner's Dilemma tournaments have been held to compete and test algorithms.The prisoner's dilemma game can be used as a model for many real world situations involving cooperative behaviour. In casual usage, the label ""prisoner's dilemma"" may be applied to situations not strictly matching the formal criteria of the classic or iterative games: for instance, those in which two entities could gain important benefits from cooperating or suffer from the failure to do so, but find it merely difficult or expensive, not necessarily impossible, to coordinate their activities to achieve cooperation.
  • studyres.com © 2026
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report